RCS - Silver Tiger Metals - Silver Tiger Announces Updated Mineral Resource
12/09/2023 14:15
For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
http://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20230912:nRSL1403Ma&default-theme=true
RNS Number : 1403M Silver Tiger Metals Inc 12 September 2023
Silver Tiger Announces Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the El Tigre
Silver-Gold Project
HALIFAX, NS / ACCESSWIRE / September 12, 2023 / Silver Tiger Metals Inc.
(TSXV:SLVR)(OTCQX:SLVTF) ("Silver Tiger" or the "Corporation") is pleased to
announce an Updated Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") for its 100% owned,
high-grade silver-gold El Tigre Project (the "Project" or "El Tigre") located
in Sonora, Mexico. This Updated MRE was based on information and data supplied
by Silver Tiger, and was undertaken by Yungang Wu, P.Geo. and Eugene Puritch,
P.Eng., FEC, CET of P&E Mining Consultants Inc. of Brampton, Ontario.
The Updated MRE includes the newly-discovered Sulfide and Black Shale Zones,
Veins and Pit-Constrained Resources (Figure 1).
The Updated MRE includes the newly-discovered Sulfide and Black Shale Zones,
Veins and Pit-Constrained Resources (Figure 1).
Highlights Include:
· Increase of 84% in Indicated Silver Equivalent ("AgEq") Ounces
from initial September 2017 Mineral Resource, with 3% increase in AgEq grade;
· Increase of 257% in Inferred AgEq Ounces from initial September
2017 Mineral Resource, with an 13% increase in AgEq grade;
· Pit-constrained El Tigre Indicated Mineral Resources of 61.4
Million ounces (Moz) AgEq grading 44 g/t AgEq contained in 43.0Million tonnes
("Mt");
· Pit-constrained El Tigre Inferred Mineral Resources of 20.0 Moz
AgEq grading 54 g/t AgEq contained in 11.5 Mt;
· Out-of-Pit El Tigre Indicated Mineral Resources of 20.8 Moz AgEq
grading 279 g/t AgEq contained in 2.3 Mt;
· Out-of-Pit El Tigre Inferred Mineral Resources of 69.8 Moz AgEq
grading 235 g/t AgEq contained in 9.2 Mt;
· Out-of-Pit Indicated Mineral Resources, at a cut-off grade of 263
g/t AgEq (3.5 gpt AuEq), contains 12.8 Moz ounces AgEq grading 484 g/t AgEq
within in 0.8 Mt;
· Out-of-Pit Inferred Mineral Resources, at a cut-off grade of 263
g/t AgEq (3.5 gpt AuEq), contains 32.4 Moz ounces AgEq grading 400 g/t AgEq
within in 2.5 Mt; and
· The El Tigre Project Mineral Resource is amenable to both open
pit and bulk underground mining methods;
Indicated Mineral Resources are estimated at 46.4 Mt grading 25 g/t silver,
0.39 g/t gold, 0.01% copper, 0.03% lead, and 0.06% zinc (0.77 g/t AuEq). The
Updated Mineral Resource Estimate includes Indicated Mineral Resources of 37.2
Moz of silver, 575 koz of gold, 9.4 Mlb of copper, 35.5 Mlb of lead, and 64.3
Mlb of zinc (1.1 Moz AuEq).
Inferred Mineral Resources are estimated at 20.9 Mt grading 78.4 g/t silver,
0.56 g/t gold, 0.04% copper, 0.13% lead, and 0.22% zinc (1.79 g/t AuEq). The
Updated Mineral Resource Estimate includes Inferred Mineral Resources of 52.6
Moz of silver, 374 koz of gold, 18.1 Mlb of copper, 59.7 Mlb of lead, and
103.4 Mlb of zinc (1.2 Moz AuEq).
Preliminary Economic Assessment
As previously announced, Silver Tiger expects to deliver its PEA during
September 2023.
Glenn Jessome, President and CEO, stated: "I would like to thank our technical
team and our external consultants for delivering this positive Mineral
Resource Estimate. The discovery of the Shale and Sulphide Zones, increased
tonnage in the Veins and further delineation of the Open Pit has greatly
increased the Mineral Resource and grade since our last published Technical
Report. We have now delineated approximately 37.2 million ounces of silver and
575 thousand ounces of gold in the Indicated category, and 52.6 million ounces
of silver and 374 thousand ounces of gold in the Inferred category." Mr.
Jessome further stated: "With this successful MRE being complete, we now turn
our attention to economics. As previously announced, we expect to deliver our
PEA in Q4 2023. This coming milestone will see Silver Tiger transition from an
explorer to a developer. This transition could significantly increase
shareholder value."
A Technical Report is being prepared on the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate
in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 ("NI-43-101"), and will be
available on the Company's website and SEDAR within 45 days of the date of
this release. The effective date of this Updated Mineral Resource Estimate is
September 12, 2023.
Figure 1: Isometric View of Mineralized Domains used in 2023 updated Mineral
Resource Estimate.
Mineral Resource Estimate Methodology - El Tigre Project
A total of 482 drill holes (124,851 metres) and 3,160 surface and adit channel
samples (6,473 metres) were used in the Mineral Resource Estimate. Historical
underground chip samples from the El Tigre Mine, totaling 16,319, were used to
define the vein limits only and not grade estimation.
P&E Mining Consultants Inc. ("P&E") collaborated with Silver Tiger
personnel to develop the mineralization models, estimates, and reporting
criteria for the Mineral Resources at El Tigre. Mineralization models were
initially developed by Silver Tiger and were reviewed and modified by P&E.
A total of twenty-three individual mineralized domains have been identified
through drilling and surface sampling. The outlines of the halos and veins
below surface from 0 to 100 m were influenced by the selection of mineralized
material above 0.3 g/t AuEq, whereas 1.0 g/t AuEq was applied for the veins
>100 m below surface that demonstrated lithological and structural zonal
continuity along strike and down-dip.
Mineralization wireframes were used as hard boundaries for the purposes of
grade estimation. A 5 m x 5 m x 5 m three-dimensional block model was used for
the Mineral Resource Estimate. The block model consists of estimated Au, Ag,
Cu, Pb and Zn grades, estimated bulk density, classification criteria, and a
block volume inclusion percent factor. Au and Ag equivalent block grades were
subsequently calculated from the estimated metal grades.
Sample assays were composited to a 1.5m standard length. Au, Ag, Cu, Pb and Zn
grades were estimated using Inverse Distance Cubed weighting of between 1 and
12 composites, with a maximum of 2 composites per drill hole. Composites were
capped prior to estimation by mineralization domain. Composite samples were
selected within an anisotropic search ellipse oriented down the plunge of
identified high grade trends.
A total of 5,699 bulk density analyses were provided in the drill hole
database. The bulk density ranged from 1.6 (dump) to 3.02 t/m (3) in the
mineralized wireframes.
Classification criteria were determined from observed grade and geological
continuity as well as variography. Indicated Mineral Resources are informed by
2 or more drill holes within 50 m; Inferred Mineral Resources are informed by
1 or more drill holes with a search radius sufficient to populate the
wireframes. No Measured Mineral Resources were calculated.
P&E is of the opinion that the Mineral Resource Estimates are suitable for
public reporting and are a reasonable representation of the mineralization and
metal content of the El Tigre Deposit.
Table 1: El Tigre Project 2023 Mineral Resources Statement ((1-10))
Deposit Tonnes Average Grade Contained Metal
Au Ag Cu Pb Zn AuEq AgEq Au Ag Cu Pb Zn AuEq AgEq
(M) (g/t) (g/t) (%) (%) (%) (g/t) (g/t) (koz) (koz) (Mlb) (Mlb) (Mlb) (koz) (koz)
Indicated:
South Zone In Pit 43.0 0.39 14 0.01 0.02 0.59 44 535 20,049 1.8 7.0 14.3 818 61,381
South Zone Out-of-Pit 1.8 0.28 200 0.18 0.59 1.02 3.83 287 16 11,453 7.2 23.1 40.1 219 16,403
North Zone Out-of-Pit 0.5 0.72 158 0.04 0.41 0.80 3.36 252 13 2,777 0.4 4.9 9.7 59 4,435
Out of Pit Total 2.3 0.38 191 0.15 0.55 0.97 3.72 279 29 14,231 7.6 28.0 49.8 278 20,838
Vein (S & N) Total 45.3 0.39 24 0.01 0.04 0.06 0.75 56 564 34,280 9.4 35.0 64.1 1,096 82,219
Low Grade Stockpile 0.1 0.9 177 0.02 0.22 0.50 3.41 255 3 588 0.1 0.5 0.2 11 847
Tailings 0.9 0.27 78 1.30 98 8 2,345 39 2,948
Total Indicated 46.4 0.39 25 0.01 0.03 0.06 0.77 58 575 37,212 9.4 35.5 64.3 1,147 86,014
Inferred:
South Zone In Pit 11.5 0.47 17 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.72 54 176 6,396 0.8 3.7 4.3 267 20,045
South Zone Out-of-Pit 5.5 0.61 170 0.09 0.22 0.39 3.23 242 107 30,072 10.7 26.9 46.8 571 42,821
North Zone Out-of-Pit 3.7 0.74 132 0.08 0.35 0.64 3.00 225 89 15,813 6.6 29.0 52.3 360 26,981
Out of Pit Total 9.2 0.66 155 0.09 0.27 0.49 3.14 235 197 45,885 17.3 55.9 99.0 931 69,801
Vein (S & N) Total 20.8 0.56 78 0.04 0.13 0.23 1.80 135 373 52,282 18.1 59.6 103.4 1,198 89,847
Low Grade Stockpile 0.0 0.46 146 0.02 0.17 0.09 2.52 189 0 83 0.1 1 108
Tailings 0.1 0.27 79 1.31 98 1 254 4 323
Total Inferred 20.9 0.56 78 0.04 0.13 0.22 1.79 135 373 52,619 18.1 59.7 103.4 1,204 90,277
1. Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves, do not have
demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be
materially affected by environmental,
permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other
relevant issues.
1. The Inferred Mineral Resource in this estimate has a lower level of
confidence than that applied to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be
converted to a Mineral Reserve.
It is reasonably expected that the majority of the Inferred Mineral Resource
could be upgraded to an Indicated Mineral Resource with continued exploration.
1. The Mineral Resources in this news release were estimated in accordance
with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), CIM
Standards on Mineral Resources
and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines (2014) prepared by the CIM Standing
Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by the CIM Council and CIM Best
Practices (2019).
1. Historically mined areas were depleted from the Mineral Resource model.
2. Approximately 74.7% of the Indicated and 22.3% of the Inferred
contained AgEq ounces are pit constrained, with the remainder out-of-pit. See
tables 2 and 3 for details of the split
between pit constrained and out-of-pit deposits.
1. The pit constrained AuEq cut-off grade of 0.14 g/t was derived from
US$1,800/oz Au price, US$24/oz Ag price, 80% process recovery for Ag and Au,
US$5.30/tonne process cost and
US$1.00/tonne G&A cost. The constraining pit optimization parameters were
$1.86/t mineralized mining cost, $1.86/t waste mining cost and 50-degree pit
slopes.
1. The out-of-pit AuEq cut-off grade of 1.5 g/t AuEq was derived from
US$1,800/oz Au price, US$24/oz Ag price, $4.00$/lb Cu, $0.95 $/lb Pb, $1.40
$/lb Zn, 85% process recovery for all
metals, $50/t mining cost, US$20/tonne process and US$4 G&A cost. The
out-of-pit Mineral Resource grade blocks were quantified above the 1.5 g/t
AuEq cut-off, below the constraining
pit shell within the constraining mineralized wireframes and exhibited
sufficient continuity to be considered for cut and fill and long hole mining
1. No Mineral Resources are classified as Measured.
2. AgEq and AuEq calculated at an Ag/Au ratio of 75:1.
3. Totals may not agree due to rounding
Table 2: AuEq Cut-off Sensitivities - Pit Constrained Mineral Resource (1)
Cut-off Tonnes Average Grade Contained Metal
Pit Constrained (AuEq) Au Ag Cu Pb Zn AuEq AgEq Au Ag Cu Pb Zn AuEq AgEq
(g/t) (M) (g/t) (g/t) (%) (%) (%) (g/t) (g/t) (koz) (koz) (Mlb) (Mlb) (Mlb) (koz) (koz)
Indicated 0.50 16.8 0.64 29 0.003 0.01 0.02 1.04 77.77 344 15,615 1.0 3.9 6.7 561 42,045
0.45 19.2 0.60 26 0.003 0.01 0.02 0.97 72.45 372 16,275 1.1 4.3 7.5 598 44,820
0.40 22.3 0.56 24 0.002 0.01 0.02 0.89 66.91 403 16,979 1.2 4.7 8.5 639 47,929
0.35 25.6 0.53 21 0.002 0.01 0.02 0.82 61.83 433 17,681 1.3 5.1 9.5 679 50,956
0.30 30.0 0.48 19 0.002 0.01 0.02 0.75 56.37 466 18,488 1.4 5.6 10.8 725 54,368
0.25 34.5 0.45 17 0.002 0.01 0.02 0.69 51.71 495 19,159 1.6 6.1 12.1 764 57,336
0.20 38.7 0.42 16 0.002 0.01 0.02 0.64 47.93 518 19,659 1.7 6.6 13.2 795 59,618
0.14 43.0 0.39 15 0.002 0.01 0.02 0.59 44.40 535 20,049 1.8 7.0 14.3 818 61,381
0.10 45.8 0.37 14 0.002 0.01 0.01 0.56 42.25 543 20,215 1.9 7.2 15.0 829 62,183
0.05 48.4 0.35 13 0.002 0.01 0.01 0.54 40.25 548 20,320 1.9 7.4 15.6 836 62,673
Inferred 0.50 5.4 0.75 31 0.005 0.02 0.02 1.19 88.89 131 5,371 0.6 2.9 2.1 206 15,443
0.45 5.9 0.72 29 0.005 0.02 0.02 1.12 84.22 136 5,511 0.6 3.0 2.3 214 16,037
0.40 6.6 0.67 27 0.004 0.02 0.02 1.05 78.62 144 5,662 0.6 3.1 2.6 223 16,762
0.35 7.5 0.63 24 0.004 0.02 0.02 0.97 72.64 152 5,829 0.7 3.2 2.9 234 17,568
0.30 8.6 0.58 22 0.004 0.02 0.02 0.89 66.57 160 5,999 0.7 3.4 3.4 246 18,413
0.25 9.8 0.53 20 0.004 0.02 0.02 0.81 60.87 168 6,204 0.8 3.5 3.8 256 19,221
0.20 10.7 0.50 18 0.003 0.02 0.02 0.76 57.18 173 6,324 0.8 3.6 4.1 263 19,715
0.14 11.5 0.47 17 0.003 0.01 0.02 0.72 54.10 176 6,396 0.8 3.7 4.3 267 20,045
0.10 11.8 0.47 17 0.003 0.01 0.02 0.71 53.06 177 6,415 0.8 3.7 4.4 268 20,124
0.05 12.0 0.46 17 0.003 0.01 0.02 0.70 52.14 177 6,422 0.8 3.7 4.5 269 20,167
1. See Table 1 notes for assumptions
Table 3: AuEq Cut-off Sensitivities - Out-of-Pit Mineral Resource (1)
Cut-off Tonnes Average Grade Contained Metal
Out of Pit (AuEq) Au Ag Cu Pb Zn AuEq AgEq Au Ag Cu Pb Zn AuEq AgEq
(g/t) (M) (g/t) (g/t) (%) (%) (%) (g/t) (g/t) (koz) (koz) (Mlb) (Mlb) (Mlb) (koz) (koz)
South Zone-Indicated 5.0 0.4 0.46 426 0.46 1.39 2.45 8.27 620 6 5,291 3.9 11.8 20.9 103 7,699
4.5 0.5 0.45 398 0.42 1.28 2.29 7.71 579 7 5,849 4.2 12.9 23.1 114 8,514
5
4.0 0.6 0.43 369 0.38 1.18 2.12 7.15 536 8 6,479 4.6 14.2 25.6 126 9,422
215.6
3.5 0.7 0.40 339 0.35 1.07 1.91 6.56 492 9 7,218 5.1 15.6 27.9 140 10,462
3.0 0.8 0.38 310 0.31 0.96 1.71 5.97 447 10 8,015 5.5 17.0 30.3 154 11,570
2.5 1.0 0.35 279 0.27 0.84 1.50 5.36 402 11 8,894 5.9 18.4 32.7 171 12,798
2.0 1.3 0.32 244 0.23 0.72 1.28 4.66 350 13 9,992 6.5 20.4 35.9 191 14,334
1.5 1.8 0.28 201 0.18 0.59 1.02 3.83 287 16 11,453 7.2 23.1 40.1 219 16,403
1.0 2.8 0.26 147 0.13 0.43 0.74 2.86 214 24 13,409 8.2 27.0 45.9 260 19,517
South Zone-Inferred 5.0 0.8 0.80 375 0.21 0.50 0.86 6.60 495 20 9,224 3.5 8.4 14.5 163 12,192
4.5 1.2 0.66 345 0.17 0.46 0.79 5.99 449 25 12,898 4.5 11.8 20.3 224 16,780
4.0 1.4 0.68 325 0.17 0.46 0.78 5.71 429 30 14,409 5.0 14.0 23.7 253 18,993
3.5 1.6 0.70 300 0.15 0.45 0.77 5.38 404 37 15,999 5.6 16.3 28.1 287 21,495
3.0 2.4 0.60 269 0.14 0.36 0.62 4.75 356 47 20,765 7.5 18.8 33.0 368 27,564
2.5 3.0 0.70 235 0.12 0.31 0.54 4.34 326 68 22,922 8.3 20.7 36.3 422 31,684
2.0 3.8 0.67 210 0.11 0.27 0.48 3.91 293 82 25,649 9.3 22.8 39.9 478 35,825
1.5 5.5 0.61 170 0.09 0.22 0.39 3.23 242 107 30,072 10.7 26.9 46.8 571 42,821
1.0 10.4 0.48 116 0.06 0.17 0.29 2.28 171 162 38,814 14.4 39.1 65.7 767 57,529
North Zone-Indicated 5.0 0.1 1.98 382 0.08 0.56 1.08 7.83 587 5 1,018 0.1 1.0 2.0 21 1,564
0
4.5 0.1 1.76 359 0.07 0.57 1.09 7.31 548 6 1,151 0.2 1.2 2.4 23 1,755
4.0 0.1 1.59 332 0.07 0.54 1.05 6.74 505 6 1,302 0.2 1.5 2.8 27 1,984
59
3.5 0.2 1.38 297 0.06 0.53 1.01 6.03 452 7 1,522 0.2 1.9 3.9 31 2,322
3.0 0.2 1.16 259 0.05 0.53 1.02 5.30 398 8 1,805 0.3 2.5 4.9 37 2,769
2.5 0.3 1.00 226 0.05 0.53 1.04 4.70 352 9 2,060 0.3 3.3 6.5 43 3,211
2.0 0.4 0.85 192 0.04 0.47 0.93 4.02 301 11 2,404 0.3 4.1 8.0 50 3,784
1.5 0.5 0.72 158 0.04 0.41 0.80 3.36 252 13 2,777 0.4 4.9 9.7 59 4,435
1.0 0.9 0.57 116 0.03 0.31 0.61 2.52 189 16 3,349 0.5 6.2 11.9 72 5,433
North Zone-Inferred 5.0 0.4 2.12 339 0.04 0.13 0.23 6.83 512 26 4,171 0.3 1.1 1.9 84 6,304
4.5 0.4 2.05 324 0.04 0.15 0.23 6.58 493 29 4,544 0.3 1.4 2.2 92 6,909
4.0 0.5 1.91 301 0.03 0.16 0.23 6.12 459 33 5,228 0.4 1.9 2.8 106 7,975
3.5 0.9 1.54 264 0.03 0.16 0.21 5.25 393 43 7,328 0.6 3.0 3.9 145 10,905
3.0 1.5 1.12 203 0.07 0.41 0.82 4.42 332 54 9,756 2.4 13.6 27.1 212 15,913
2.5 1.9 1.06 187 0.06 0.37 0.73 4.07 305 64 11,318 2.6 15.6 30.4 247 18,490
2.0 2.5 0.95 166 0.05 0.35 0.67 3.64 273 75 13,114 2.9 18.7 36.1 287 21,560
1.5 3.7 0.74 132 0.08 0.35 0.64 3.00 225 89 15,813 6.6 29.0 52.3 360 26,981
1.0 4.7 0.65 115 0.07 0.31 0.55 2.62 197 100 17,524 7.6 32.4 57.7 400 29,979
1. See Table 1 notes for assumptions
Qualified Persons
Dave Duncan P. Geo., VP Exploration of Silver Tiger, Charles Spath, P. Geo.,
VP of Technical Services of Silver Tiger, and Eugene Puritch, P.Eng., FEC,
CET, President of P&E Mining Consultants are the Qualified Persons as
defined under National Instrument 43-101. Mr. Duncan, Mr. Spath and Mr.
Puritch have reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information in
this press release.
About Silver Tiger and the El Tigre Historic Mine District
Silver Tiger Metals Inc. is a Canadian company whose management has more than
25 years' experience discovering, financing and building large epithermal
silver projects in Mexico. Silver Tiger's 100% owned 28,414 hectare Historic
El Tigre Mining District is located in Sonora, Mexico. Principled
environmental, social and governance practices are core priorities at Silver
Tiger.
The El Tigre historic mine district is located in Sonora, Mexico and lies at
the northern end of the Sierra Madre silver and gold belt which hosts many
epithermal silver and gold deposits, including Dolores, Santa Elena and Las
Chispas at the northern end. In 1896, gold was first discovered on the
property in the Gold Hill area and mining started with the Brown Shaft in
1903. The focus soon changed to mining high-grade silver veins in the area
with production coming from 3 parallel veins the El Tigre Vein, the Seitz
Kelley Vein and the Sooy Vein. Underground mining on the middle El Tigre Vein
extended 1,450 metres along strike and was mined on 14 levels to a depth of
approximately 450 metres. The Seitz Kelley Vein was mined along strike for 1
kilometre to a depth of approximately 200 meters. The Sooy Vein was only mined
along strike for 250 metres to a depth of approximately 150 metres. Mining
abruptly stopped on all 3 of these veins when the price of silver collapsed to
less than 20¢ per ounce with the onset of the Great Depression. By the time
the mine closed in 1930, it is reported to have produced a total of 353,000
ounces of gold and 67.4 million ounces of silver from 1.87 million tons
(Craig, 2012). The average grade mined during this period was over 2 kilograms
silver equivalent per ton.
For further information, please contact:
Glenn Jessome
President and CEO
902 492 0298
jessome@silvertigermetals.com (mailto:jessome@silvertigermetals.com)
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT:
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that
term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts
responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
This News Release includes certain "forward-looking statements". All
statements other than statements of historical fact included in this release,
including, without limitation, statements regarding potential mineralization,
Mineral Resources and Reserves, the ability to convert Inferred Mineral
Resources to Indicated Mineral Resources, the ability to complete future
drilling programs and infill sampling, the ability to extend resource blocks,
the similarity of mineralization at El Tigre to Delores, Santa Elena and
Chispas, exploration results, and future plans and objectives of Silver Tiger,
are forward-looking statements that involve various risks and uncertainties.
Forward-looking statements are frequently characterized by words such as
"may", "is expected to", "anticipates", "estimates", "intends", "plans",
"projection", "could", "vision", "goals", "objective" and "outlook" and other
similar words. Although Silver Tiger believes the expectations expressed in
such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there can
be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual
results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in
such statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from Silver Tiger's expectations include risks and uncertainties
related to exploration, development, operations, commodity prices and global
financial volatility, risk and uncertainties of operating in a foreign
jurisdiction as well as additional risks described from time to time in the
filings made by Silver Tiger with securities regulators.
SOURCE: Silver Tiger Metals Inc.
This information is provided by Reach, the non-regulatory press release distribution service of RNS, part of the London Stock Exchange. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
. END NRAGSGDCLDBDGXDRecent news on Silver Tiger Metals
See all newsRCS - Silver Tiger Metals - Silver Tiger Provides Update
AnnouncementRCS - Silver Tiger Metals - Silver Tiger Provides Update
AnnouncementRCS - Silver Tiger Metals - Silver Tiger Announces PEA With NPV of US$287M
AnnouncementRCS - Silver Tiger Metals - Silver Tiger Announces Filing of Technical Report
AnnouncementRCS - Silver Tiger Metals - Silver Tiger Announces Updated Mineral Resource
Announcement