Picture of Tullow Oil logo

TLW Tullow Oil News Story

0.000.00%
gb flag iconLast trade - 00:00
EnergyHighly SpeculativeSmall CapValue Trap

REG - Tullow Oil PLC Tullow Oil PLC - FP Tullow Oil PLC - NP - Annual Financial Report & Accounts

 
RNS Number : 8367G
Tullow Oil PLC
06 March 2018

6 March, 2018

Tullow Oil PLC
Annual Report and Accounts

Tullow Oil plc ("Tullow" or the "Company")

Following the release on 7 February 2018 of the Company's preliminary full year results announcement for the year ended 31 December 2017 (the"PreliminaryAnnouncement"), the Company announces it has published its Annual Report and Accounts for this period (the "Annual Report and Accounts").

A copy of the Annual Report and Accounts is available to view on the Company's website: www.tullowoil.com

The Company's 2018 AGM will be held at the Company's registered address at 9Chiswick Park, 566 Chiswick High Road, London, W4 5XT on Wednesday 25 April 2018 at 12 noon. The Notice of Annual General Meeting 2018 will be sent separately to shareholders in the coming weeks, and will also be available to view on the Company's website. A separate announcement will be made when the Notice of Annual General Meeting is available.

In accordance with Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rule 6.3.5(2)(b), additional information is set out in the appendices to this announcement. This information is extracted in full unedited text from the Annual Report and Accounts.

The Preliminary Announcement included a set of condensed financial statements and a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company and its group.

In accordance with Listing Rule 9.6.1, a copy of the Annual Report and Accounts has been submitted to the Financial Conduct Authority via the National Storage Mechanism and will be available for viewing shortly at http://www.morningstar.co.uk/uk/nsm.

This document is also being submitted to the Irish Stock Exchange and the Ghana Stock Exchange, and therefore will shortly be available for inspection at the Irish Stock Exchange (28 Anglesea Street, Dublin 2, Ireland) and will be available to shareholders located in Ghana by contacting the Company's registrar: Central Securities Depository (Ghana) Limited, 4th Floor, Cedi House, PMB CT 465 Cantonments, Accra, Ghana (Telephone: +233 (0)302 689 313 or +233 (0)302 972 312544).

For further information, please contact:

Tullow Oil plc (London) (+44 (0) 20 3249 9000)

Investor Relations


Media Relations

Chris Perry


George Cazenove

Nicola Rogers


Anna Brog

Appendices

Appendix A: Directors' responsibility statement

The following directors' responsibility statement is extracted from the Annual Report and Accounts (page 108).

Directors' responsibility statement required by DTR 4.1.12R

We confirm that to the best of our knowledge:

the Financial Statements, prepared in accordance with the relevant financial reporting framework, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole;

the Strategic Report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face; and

the Annual Report and Financial Statements, taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and understandable and provide the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company's position and performance, business model and strategy.

By order of the Board

Paul McDade

Chief Executive Officer

6 February 2018

Les Wood

Chief Financial Officer

6 February 2018

Appendix B: A description of the principal risks and uncertainties that the Company faces

The following description of the principal risks and uncertainties that the Company faces is extracted from the Annual Report and Accounts (pages 44 to 49).

Principal Risks

On pages 44 to 49 we have identified the principal risks that we see as most relevant to Tullow at this time. There may be other risks that could emerge in the future. If these risks are not successfully managed, our cash flow, operating results, financial position, business and reputation could be materially adversely affected.

Strategic

Principal risks

Causes

Potential impact

Risk mitigation and assurance

2017 outcomes and ongoing actions

1. Strategy not fully achievable in sustained low oil price environment

Executive responsibility

Paul McDade

Chief Executive Officer

Link to KPI/scorecard

Strategic Financing

Safe, Sustainable
and Efficient Operations

Business Development and Growth

Low oil price environment due to global supply/demand balances and shift to alternative energy sources as a result of climate change

Inability to deleverage the business

Inability to monetise chosen assets

Capital committed to suboptimal projects

Overheads not matched to asset base

Portfolio not optimised to sustain long-term strategy

Robust planning of strategy

Business plan reviewed by the Executive Team and approved annually by the Board

Strict capital allocation process in line with the business plan

Track delivery through rigorous regular performance management and reporting

Board Strategy Day portfolio reviews

Improved Group capital allocation process and reporting

Optimised 2018 planned capital spend

Tested and retained options for increased EBITDA delivery

Improved focus on overheads

Focused on deleveraging options

Detailed portfolio review

2. Inability to progress major portfolio options

Executive responsibility

Les Wood

Chief Financial Officer

Link to KPI/scorecard

Strategic Financing

Reduction in market appetite for E&P assets

Uncertainty around projects

Inability to monetise chosen assets and deleverage balance sheet

Write-downs on acquired assets

Failure to exit mature assets with low returns

Exposure to decommissioning costs

Regular portfolio assessments by the Board

Meet relevant commercial and investment appraisal standards

Review all major acquisition or divestment proposals

Approval process for all major decisions and new country entry proposals

Implemented a new Corporate Centre Acquisition & Divestments role to increase deal expertise

Improved portfolio analysis

Biannual portfolio reviews with Business Delivery Teams

Portfolio reviewed by the Board

Executing current strategic portfolio plan

Focus on securing maximum value in current operations

Clear identification of level of commitments in new licences

Successful farm-down of Uganda and disposal of non-core/mature assets

3. Disruption to business due to community/political/ regulatory influence

Executive responsibility

Sandy Stash

EVP - Safety, Operations, Engineering & External Affairs

Link to KPI/scorecard

Safe, Sustainable
and Efficient Operations

Business Development and Growth

Fiscal pressures on Government as a result of reduced revenues due to low oil price

Local currency exchange rate challenges

Uncertainty arising from changes in Government leadership

Pace of national content requirements

Government inability to deliver infrastructure on time for projects and provide security for critical infrastructure

Significant variance to plans due to delayed regulatory approvals/lack of support

Regulatory and tax changes affecting profitability and viability of projects/operations

Inability to achieve community support for new projects due to opposition/loss of licence to operate

Unplanned costs due to community unrest/opposition

Significant security risk to Tullow employees and contractors

Inability to execute commercial transactions

Non-technical risk standard sets minimum requirements for stakeholder management

Country strategy papers and stakeholder engagement plans, supported by experienced staff to manage developments

Social investment projects mapped to business development plans

Plans to increase local content incorporated into contracting strategy

Fully embedded non-technical risk standard

Mapped and set out integrated solutions for complex risks

Negotiated TEN gas sales/delivery agreements and delivered TEN successfully

Negotiated settlement of tax disputes

Improved stakeholder strategy

Developed an approach and plan to obtain agreements with communities

Landscape level approach to development adopted

Financial

Principal risks

Causes

Potential impact

Risk mitigation and assurance

2017 outcomes and ongoing actions

4. Insufficient liquidity & funding capacity

Executive responsibility

Les Wood

Chief Financial Officer

Link to KPI/scorecard

Strategic Financing

Oil price downturn

Lack of capital discipline and unsuccessful portfolio management

Reduced asset quality limiting ability to raise debt

Reduced bank/DCM appetite for E&P sector

Significant unplanned cash outflows and elevated leverage

Inability to finance strategic objectives

Ability to raise further debt constrained

Inability to fund capital investment/projects

Prudent approach to diversified debt and equity, with a balance maintained through business planning and performance management processes

Board-approved funding policy targets in place

Optimisation of debt capital structure

Good relationships with banks and capital market investors

Regular funding and liquidity projections reported to management and periodic financing strategy review carried out

Financing standard in place to ensure optimal funding

$750 million Rights Issue enabled stepped reduction in debt

Completed $2.5 billion RBL refinancing and one year tenor extension of RCF

2017 year-end facility headroom and free cash of $1.1 billion; net debt of $3.5 billion

YE2017 Net Debt/EBITDAX 2.6x

Strength of assets retained of debt capacity despite fall in low oil price environment

5. Failure to manage oil price risk

Executive responsibility

Les Wood

Chief Financial Officer

Link to KPI/scorecard

Strategic Financing

Low oil price environment due to global supply/demand balances and shift to alternative energy sources as a result of climate change

Reduced cash flows, revenue, EBITDA, asset value and debt capacity

Insufficient funding to support investment programme

Board-approved hedge programme to protect against low oil prices

Programme monitored regularly and communicated to the Board

Hedging programme executed and approved in accordance with the policy

Regular review of hedge strategy, position and effectiveness

2017 Net hedge receipts of $110 million

Approximately 60 per cent of 2017 entitlement oil production hedged at an average floor price of $60.32/bbl

Operational

Principal risks

Causes

Potential impact

Risk mitigation and assurance

2017 outcomes and ongoing actions

6. Major process safety/equipment/EHS failure

Executive responsibility

Gary Thompson

EVP - West Africa

Mark MacFarlane

EVP - East Africa

Ian Cloke

EVP - New Ventures

Link to KPI/scorecard

Safe, Sustainable
and Efficient Operations

Inadequate maintenance of safety critical equipment on board Jubilee/TEN FPSOs

Loss of wells, subsea equipment or FPSO systems

Error in well design, equipment selection or programme

Ineffective standards and procedures, improper work practices or lack of training

Loss of rig position

Multiple fatalities

Serious environmental or asset damage

Serious financial/reputational damage

Significant loss of production, injection or export capacity and disruption to business operations

Independently verified safety cases to demonstrate risks reduced to ALARP and EHS management system in place

Minimum asset integrity, well integrity requirements, maintenance and planning requirements mandated

Analysis of key FPSO systems (power, gas, water, etc.) to support top quartile reliability and computerised maintenance management system (CMMS) to manage asset integrity

All wells designed, constructed and operated in accordance with appropriate standards and procedures

Comprehensive all-risk insurance package including business interruption and construction risk programmes

Third-party well assurance

Safety case verification by industry experts

Competency gaps/losses identified

Assurance against production operations standards

Assurance against Production Well Integrity Procedure

Original turret manufacturer and JV Partners input to Case to Operate, with external assurance

Asset Integrity and Reliability Plan in place

Well integrity management system, FPSO performance standards and assurance and verification criteria implemented

Insurance process in place

Frequent review of well engineering management system to ensure well control risk effectively addressed

Rig HSE case and third-party equipment audits carried out

Training and competency matrix and asset integrity and reliability plan in place

7. Inability to replenish exploration portfolio

Executive responsibility

Angus McCoss

Exploration Director

Link to KPI/scorecard

Business Development
and Growth

Lack of/under investment in portfolio high-grading activities

Lack of dedicated resources to identify new business activities

Failure to encourage entrepreneurial/ creative exploration innovation or demotivation of key staff

Failure to generate a quality drill-ready prospect queue

Loss of reputation and exploration value from share price

Sustained exploration failure results in poor or no drill-ready prospects and diminished future development options and production ramp-up

New opportunities are considered against existing portfolio to maintain diversity of prospects

Exploration portfolio is reviewed at least annually

An Exploration and Appraisal Values Controls Standard is in place

Exploration and Development Geosciences Executive team
works across the business on portfolio planning

Four new PSCs granted in Cte d'Ivoire supporting replenishment of the exploration portfolio in an oil-prone area

Major 3D seismic campaigns in Uruguay (block 15), Guyana (Orinduik and Kanuku licences) and Mauritania (C3 and C18), a 2D programme in Jamaica and an FTG survey in Zambia all complete in 2017 to create campaign options for 2018/19

Farm-down of Namibia PEL37 to manage risk exposure at drilling stage

Operational

Principal risks

Causes

Potential impact

Risk mitigation and assurance

2017 outcomes and ongoing actions

8. Major cyber or information security incident

Executive responsibility

Angus McCoss

Exploration Director

Link to KPI/scorecard

Safe, Sustainable
and Efficient Operations

External cyber-attack resulting in network compromise or disruptive/ destructive impact to Industrial Control Systems

Deliberate or accidental internal theft/loss of confidential information

Disruption to or halt of critical business systems resulting in stopped production, explosion or loss of life

Loss or theft of confidential information

Loss of competitive advantage and intellectual property

Reputational damage

Advanced Security Operations Centre (ASOC) provides global monitoring, analysis, alerting and incident response

Bespoke advanced security equipment used at key operations sites

Automated vulnerability scans matched with published threat information

Third-party specialists analyse vulnerabilities and provide network assurance activities

Second annual distribution of enterprise-wide information security awareness training and certification

Ongoing bespoke training for higher risk areas

Ongoing work to embed cyber security standards across TEN and Jubilee Industrial Control Systems

9. Failure to have a balanced, diverse workforce & attractive employee proposition

Executive responsibility

Claire Hawking

EVP - Organisation Strategy
& Company Performance

Link to KPI/scorecard

Organisation

Tullow culture and values not embedded

Staff do not support our current operating model

Lack of confidence in strategy and senior leadership

Diversity and localisation plans not effectively implemented

Ineffective staff development and reward programmes

Loss of key personnel/lack of succession and increased staff turnover

Lack of in-house skills and requirement to buy in short-term contractors increase costs

Negative relations with the Government due to failure to implement localisation plans

Reputational damage

Succession planning, localisation and diversity objectives are set and key targets monitored

Diversity plan approved by the Board

Periodic reporting to Executives of HR data

Staff engagement plan is agreed with HR, Communications and Executives, with key actions

Annual employee engagement survey and annual review of reward package

Further embedded organisation operating model with clear accountabilities

Embedded performance management framework

Implemented Action Plan from 2016 employee survey

Reviewed and revised reward packages aligned with Tullow's Remuneration Policy

Implementation of Diversity & Inclusion Plan

Set up Project LEAP, which focuses on talent development and agile working

Compliance

Principal risks

Causes

Potential impact

Risk mitigation and assurance

2017 outcomes and ongoing actions

10. Major breach of business or ethical conduct standards

Executive responsibility

Les Wood

Chief Financial Officer

Link to KPI/scorecard

Organisation

Insufficient staff understanding of compliance

Poor leadership behaviour

Insufficient 'speaking up' culture

Lack of compliance monitoring in Business Units and failure to adequately respond to non-compliance

Unethical behaviour

Breach of anti-corruption laws

Tullow investigated resulting in reputational damage/fines

Senior officers prosecuted under
anti-corruption laws

Strong oversight and leadership from the Board

E-learning training modules for Code of Ethical Conduct, with annual certification for all staff

Ethics & Compliance standards, policies and procedures in place

Dedicated Ethics & Compliance Advisers in key Business Units

Appropriate due diligence carried out in relation to service providers, contractors and other counterparties

Delivered a revised e-learning module across Tullow to promote the Code of Ethical Conduct. 100 per cent of staff completed the training

Achieved 100 per cent completion of the self-certification of compliance with the Code of Ethical Conduct

Received and investigated 60 'speak up' cases

Continued local fraud awareness training

Appendix C: Related party transactions

The following related party transactions are extracted from the Annual Report and Accounts (page 151).

The Directors of Tullow Oil plc are considered to be the only key management personnel as defined by IAS 24 - Related Party Disclosures.


2017 ($m)

2016 ($m)

Short-term employee benefits

6.7

8.9

Post-employment benefits

0.8

1.0

Amounts awarded under long-term incentive schemes

2.6

3.7

Share-based payments

2.5

2.6


12.6

16.2

Short-term employee benefits

These amounts comprise fees paid to the Directors in respect of salary and benefits earned during the relevant financial year, plus bonuses awarded for the year.

Post-employment benefits

These amounts comprise amounts paid into the pension schemes of the Directors.

Amounts awarded under long-term incentive schemes

These amounts relate to the shares granted under the annual bonus scheme that is deferred for three years under the Deferred Share Bonus Plan (DSBP) and Tullow Incentive Plan (TIP).

Share-based payments

This is the cost to the Group of Directors' participation in share-based payment plans, as measured by the fair value of options and shares granted, accounted for in accordance with IFRS 2 Share-based Payments.

There are no other related party transactions. Further details regarding transactions with the Directors of Tullow Oil plc are disclosed in the Directors' Remuneration Report on pages 78 to 100.

END


This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
END
ACSUGUQAWUPRGUQ

Recent news on Tullow Oil

See all news