Norway asks supreme court to overturn environmental verdict against oilfields (updated)

Var Energi ASA

24/08/2026 11:08

Two lower courts backed environmental groups
Government says sufficient climate considerations were made
Cancelling permits could hit energy security, government argues
Updates with start of case, adds interviews with Greenpeace leader in paragraphs 4-5, attorney general in paragraphs 9-10
By Terje Solsvik and Gwladys Fouche
OSLO, Aug 24 (Reuters) - Norway's government on Monday asked the country's supreme court to overturn a lower-court ruling that invalidated permits for three oilfields, in a closely watched case that could reshape how the country approves new petroleum projects.

        The case pits environmental groups against Norway's oil industry, provider of half the country's export revenue, as well as the government whose policy is to prolong the extraction of crude and natural gas for decades to come.
Two lower courts have ruled in favour of Greenpeace and Young Friends of the Earth since the two groups first brought the case to trial in 2023, finding that Norway failed to properly assess the environmental impact from the three fields.
"If we win this round, it could change Norwegian oil politics forever," Haldis Tjeldflaat Helle, leader of Greenpeace Norway, told Reuters outside the court.
"It means that Norwegian politicians will have to actually assess how many lives will be lost, how many forest fires will be created and how much ice will melt due to Norwegian oil."

     The case concerns Equinor's EQNR.OL Breidablikk and Aker BP's AKRBP.OL Tyrving and Yggdrasil fields, of which the first two are already in production while the third is due to come on stream next year.
The green campaigners argue that the government failed to consider the climate impact of the burning of the fields' oil and gas, known as Scope 3 emissions, and that efforts to rectify this at a later stage were invalid.
     
ENERGY SECURITY AT STAKE, GOVERNMENT SAYS
But the lower courts have declined to order a halt to production while the legal process is ongoing, and have also suggested that the government could seek to remedy regulatory shortcomings.
"The government's position is of course that the licences are valid," Fredrik Sejersted, Norway's attorney general, told Reuters ahead of the hearing.
 "If they should be overturned then it will be quite complicated," he said. "Legally, politically and for energy security in Europe."

     Norway produces around 2% of global oil and became Europe's largest supplier of natural gas after Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, making it a crucial provider of energy.
The supreme court hearing is set to run for four days, and a verdict in the case is expected sometime later this year.

 (Reporting by Terje Solsvik and Gwladys Fouche; Editing by Stephen Coates and Louise Heavens)
 ((terje.solsvik@thomsonreuters.com; +47 918 666 70))