2024 in Review - winners and losers across the StockRank spectrum
There’s no better way to close out a year than with a good review. You can envy the stocks that doubled, while cursing the commenters that kept you out. You can mock the stocks that halved, while forgetting they’re still in your kids ISAs. And, of course, you can dream how much better off you’d be, if only you’d not gone to cash in your mid-year panic.
So let’s dig into the stocks and stats and cut ourselves some slack. Investing is joy, regret and humour all at the same time. A tragedy and a comedy, with the endless promise of doing just a little bit better next year.
The numbers tell a story
2024 turned out to be remarkably... normal. From the 1st January to the 20th December, 90+ StockRank stocks returned 11% before dividends, which is right on their long term average. Add an average yield of 3.9%, and they generated a 15% total return. That’s good going in what were tough UK markets (the average price of all UK listed shares above a £10m market cap fell by 2% this year).

Good stocks climbed a wall of worry, while junk stocks took a battering. If you want to know why I never buy stocks at less than a 50 StockRank - the chart above explains it well. I really don’t fancy losing up to 32% in any year.
As they say, there are lies, damned lies and statistics. So let’s review a few more. If you picked a 90+ ranked share in 2024 you had a 57% chance of picking a winner. That’s not bad at all, but it’s also not great. In 2014 picking winners in the 90+ bucket was like shooting fish in a barrel. I drew 19 out of 20 winners that year. Let’s hope for a repeat in 2025.

We can line up the returns of all shares with a starting StockRank of 80 and visualise the distribution of winners and losers. As you can see below, there were a few shares with higher ranks that lost more than 50% in the year, but many more that gained 50-150%.

Contrast with stocks that had a starting StockRank of 50 or below. If you bought these you really were playing with fire. Two-thirds of these "story stocks" lost you money. Sure, a few stories paid off big, but the odds were stacked against you.

You have to own enough stocks
Every year, someone will write in to cancel their subscription with the comment "I bought a 90+ ranked stock, and it fell 30%" Well, this may be a painful outcome, and I do empathise but it’s not unusual for a single stock portfolio. Just look how many dots are below the zero line at all levels of StockRank in the chart below. Individual stocks are very volatile!

Private investors often get greedy and buy just enough stocks to count on one hand. Not a good idea. The best way to have picked up the returns to the StockRanks was to have owned a minimum of 10 high-ranked stocks - and better 20.
The biggest high StockRank winners
There have been some fabulous returns in high-ranked shares this year. Six shares have more than doubled, giving out a string of “ahead of expectations” announcements through the year. The NAPS Portfolio (the model portfolio I run annually) managed to pick two of them in Metals Exploration and Greencore which is a great result.

Of the top 20, there were some notable themes:
- Four gold miners soared with the rising gold price - Pan African Resources having its day in the sun, Serabi Gold, Griffin Mining and Metals Exploration. Three of the six “doublers” were gold miners.
- Three large caps - Rolls Royce , International Consolidated Airlines, and Barclays.
- Two companies supplying own brand goods to supermarkets - BAKK and GNC.
- Construction and building materials back in vogue - Cairn Homes, Galliford Try, Keller, Morgan Sindall, Alumasc.
- And a broad tail of Software (Eleco, Cohort), Marketing Services (System 1, Nexxen International) and more.
And as I say almost every year, so many of these high ranked stocks were rather ignored at the start of the year. We’re terribly biased against solid companies, that plod along making profits, at cheap valuations. People want excitement so buy stocks like Avacta instead. Honestly, it beats me. The tortoise wins the race, every time.
Digging through the losers…
Sadly, there have been plenty of dogs among the high StockRank shares in 2024. Digging through the losers, we find plenty of broadly owned, past favourites in this list. ShoeZone, Serica Energy, Sanderson Design and Sylvania Platinum. Some of these names subscribers have made a lot of money on in the past.

Sylvania Platinum has been one of the most broadly owned stocks in the community after ten-bagging from 2017 to 2021. The decline has been painful, but Keelan Cooper does believe better times are ahead for the PGM sector.
Ingenta was picked in the NAPS Portfolio at the start of the year, and seemed popular with some smart private investors at an event in February. But it’s a tiny microcap, and the lack of liquidity can really hurt when things aren’t going your way. Caveat Emptor.
The magnetism of multibagging
Of all the tragedies that befell private investors in 2024, it was the lust for microcap multibaggers. The returns have been pretty dismal. AIM has gone back into a downtrend, and sub £50m market cap stocks kept declining. Sticking with higher ranked, stocks was the way to go across all size groups, but especially in large caps. The chart below illustrates it.

But the real reason we all love a microcap is the volatility. When they go, they really go. There were 23 stocks that doubled in 2024 (above a starting market cap of £10m). Nearly half of those were to be found in the sub £50m space, and not a single one in large caps. Your odds of finding a microcap multibagger might have been dismal, but that’s why you had a go.

The ones that got away…
So let’s cap this piece off with a final bit of FOMO. Below are the 23 stocks that have more than doubled in 2024, colour coded by their starting StockRank - with low ranks in red, mid ranks in amber and high ranks in green.

Yes the very biggest winners in the year had very low starting StockRanks. It’s the same almost every year. Lottery stocks really do sometimes payoff. That’s where nose to the ground fundamental research really can pay off. I always think that the lower the StockRank the greater the opportunity for a talented stock market researcher who has done their daily due diligence.
In that vein, the daily stock market reporting team managed to hustle out some big winners in 2024 in their annual watchlists that didn’t come from the 80+ StockRank set. CMC Markets (StockRank 71), Trustpilot (StockRank 54) and Beeks Financial Cloud (SR 30). And finally, well done to all those who toughed it out in N Brown - Deep Value investing really does work - but the journey to the payoff can be such a tough one!
Please do let us know your best, conviction ideas among the 80+ StockRank set for 2025 below, and which of the same stocks you absolutely think subscribers should avoid.
*PPS - I do recommend downloading the 175 page ebook “Investing with the StockRanks” as a read through the New Year. It’s packed full of insights and strategies about how to make the most of the good, cheap, strong stocks that the StockRanks find in every market cycle.
Disclaimer
This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.


22 comments
Please do let us know your best, conviction ideas among the 80+ StockRank set for 202
8 picks from the USA
A few hours after your note Windward (LON:WNWD) would easily have made the cut for performance. At Jan 1st 2024 it was a Stockrank of 34 and a price of 81p. As yesterday closed it was 208p after the bid news, a 156% rise ( the Stockrank is still only 42).
Excellent article and what you say about the FOMO bug that presses DIY investors to continually dabble in the AIM and small cap market hoping to cash in on some new service or product is all too true and afflicted me. However recent trialling of your Naps method and backdating equal value imaginary purchases of the two current top ranked stocks in all 10 categories, to 1st October, around the time of my joining with the exception of BT and Vodophone which I swapped for Helios underwriting and Siemens Energy, shows a 3 month gain of over 15% even allowing for the dreadful final week of FTSE falls in the week just behind us, when the worst daily loss was only 0.3% compared with my actual investment portfolio, which dropped over 1.3% not least because I had decided on Novo Nordisk being a good bet, through "fear of missing out" rather than any appreciable stock or value rank attributed to it.
Thanks Ed, great conclusions, very interesting. It would be super amazing if you guys would start discussing more European stocks. I know the UK is an interesting market but so is Poland, Germany, Sweden etc. And there it's much harder without guidance to understand what's going on in the companies due to language barriers etc.
My top stocks for 2025:
TP Icap (LON:TCAP)
Jet2 (LON:JET2)
Polar Capital Holdings (LON:POLR)
Epwin (LON:EPWN)
Yu (LON:YU.)
Quilter (LON:QLT)
Time Finance (LON:TIME)
Alumasc (LON:ALU)
Synectics (LON:SNX)
3i (LON:III)
Games Workshop (LON:GAW)
All high stockranks.
Re Metals Exploration (LON:MTL) l did not select that in my NAPs, spread was too wide, but picked Serabi Gold (LON:SRB) instead.
Hi Rusty, I hold Serabi Gold (LON:SRB) , having held at a loss then doubling down, now up 124% compared to the 161% shwon in Ed's chart. I think your selection for 2025 will ecel if only one were to sit on cash and buy those companies when the FTSE All-share is on the floor as it was in January 2024 and take it from there. Right now the future of the FTSE can be no more than a stab in the political dark.
An interesting analysis. If I analyse my own portfolio I have 28 stocks of which 21 (75%) have a SR> 80. In addition all but 1 are a QM and VM score of >80. So whilst momentum is the major selection metric for me I have feet in both the Quality and Value camps.
None are a conviction stock, but I am as confident as I can be that approach will work again in 2025!
Are these charts based on mcap, stock rank etc at the start of the year or the end ? eg a stock rank starting at 30 might finish the year at 70
Yes - all based on the cap and rank at the start of the year.
So that won't take into account the spread on those stocks, some of which can be wide.
I think I recall spread was taken into consideration during the early NAPS, could very well be wrong.
Yes it was some years.
Rusty, you're not taking the spread from Stockopedia are you? MMs typically offer prices well inside the stated price. Alternatively, putting a limit order at the mid-price in the end of day auction is often successful, bypassing the spread entirely.
No, l'm using actual prices. Spreads can be wider as well, especially if there is bad news or you can't sell at all.
Do you use a specific broker for that please Andy ? I think that HL offer ' kill or fill ' which I have never successfully used as yet ....Many thanks in advance
IG
How do you do that on lG?
Last time l bid for shares, l only got 1, the dealing cost was more than the share.
Don't think I've ever had a partial fill - just leave the mid-priced limit order for the required shares on the Exchange shortly before EOD. In recent times had success with this on Good Energy, Sylvania Platinum, McBride and Steppe Cement, among others, although looking at my trading history a larger number were filled at the mid-price pre-market close.
Thanks. So just before the close, ie 16.30, you place the limited bid?
no, think most were left earlier, a few hours - the time was dictated more by my dog needing a walk than any trading methodology.
Another fabulous article Ed. The content coming from you and the team this year really has been excellent.
Please do let us know your best, conviction ideas among the 80+ StockRank set for 2025
Seeing as you ask, 8 of my 16 individual stocks have an overall StockRank over 80. This was a surprise to me because I don’t usually look at the overall StockRank, rather I look at the individual QVM rankings, so reviewing the 8 below 80 has now become a task for me over the festive period (fortunately my to do list is clear). Anyway, here are the 8 that are above 80. I like them all but have no clue which will perform best in the year ahead.
I wish you, the Stockopedia team and my fellow subscribers a happy, healthy and prosperous new year.
Cheers
Simon
Thanks Ed, still really useful even after a decade. I don’t know how labour intensive the NAPs/SNAPs are for you and your team, but if you can keep them going in some form, they are very interesting. Merry Christmas.