100

Daily Stock Market Report (Tue 19th May 2026) - CURY, IGG, DPLM, LUCE, DOCS, CWK, DCC

Good morning!

President Trump has delayed fresh strikes on Iran for at least a few days, but “possibly maybe forever”. Gulf states including Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE asked him to let talks continue.

The oil market has reflected the uncertainty: yesterday afternoon Brent Crude reached a low of $104 around 1pm, before jumping to $109.50 yesterday evening.

Interestingly, Trump met with Chinese leader Xi Jinping last week and discussed the possibility of lifting sanctions on companies that buy Iranian oil - this would be welcome news as China previously bought the majority of Iranian oil.

How does any of this apply to our daily company analysis? Honestly I think that for most companies, it’s not too relevant. Iran-related "macro uncertainty" is expressed primarily via oil and gas prices. Oil and gas prices are an important input for many companies, and they do have ripple effects throughout the economy, but frankly I think that most healthy companies are not so energy-intensive that they can't absorb a c. 50p increase in the price of diesel. Plenty of companies are still trading "in line" despite all of the negative headlines.

I think of the rise in energy prices as just another tax on business, and one that could be ended sooner than expected, whenever the conflict ends. In the meantime, consumers still need to consume. Life goes on.

Overnight market movements:

  • The FTSE is set to open up 0.4% at 10,330
  • S&P 500 is down 0.3% at 7,383
  • Brent crude at $110
  • Natural gas at 122p per therm

We're finished for today, thank you. Spreadsheet accompanying this report: link.


Companies Reporting

Name (Mkt Cap)RNSSummaryOur view (Author)

Standard Chartered (LON:STAN) (£43bn | SR88)

Standard Chartered targets - 18% RoTE in 2030

New medium-term targets: RoTE >15% in 2028, building to ~18% in 2030. High-teens EPS CAGR and 5-7% income CAGR from 2025-2028.

Fresnillo (LON:FRES) (£25bn | SR88)

AGM Statement

2025: silver production was in line with guidance, while gold was ahead of guidance. “The longer-term outlook is positive. We anticipate that at least one of our advanced prospects will join our development portfolio in the coming two to three years.”

Diploma (LON:DPLM) (£8.9bn | SR75)

Half Year Results

Organic revenue growth 15%. Adjusted EPS growth 36% to 109.2p. Upgrade to FY26 guidance: organic revenue growth to be 12% (previously 9%) and operating profit growth to be over 30%, which is a 6% upgrade to consensus.AMBER/GREEN = (Roland)
A very strong set of half-year figures with another upgrade to full-year guidance. My impression is that this business is another indirect beneficiary of the AI data centre boom in the US. I also note continued strong contributions from acquisitions and impressive overall profitability.
I am a long-term fan of this business and can’t really fault today’s update, but the outlook for next year suggests slower growth. When paired with a demanding valuation, this means that I’m leaving my previous moderately positive view unchanged today.

IG group (LON:IGG) (£5.2bn | SR93)

AGM trading update

SP +9%
Q1 organic total revenue up 19% year-on-year. ​”2026 guidance upgraded to organic total revenue growth of 10-15%... ahead of prior guidance of high single-digits… Medium-term outlook upgraded to at least 10% organic total revenue compound growth per annum.”
GREEN = (Graham - I hold)
I'm a happy holder and excited about what IG might achieve next. The Strategic Review in particular is very interesting, and could accelerate returns for shareholders - e.g. a US listing could, I think, result in a sharply improved valuation. Why buy IBKR at over 30x earnings when IG Group is available at less than 15x?

DCC (LON:DCC) (£5.1bn | SR95)

Results for the year ended 31 March 2026

Adjusted continuing operating profit up 3.6% to £634m. Actual profit after tax from continuing operations of £286.9m (2025: £307m). Changing name to DCC Energy Plc. “...our performance keeps us on track to deliver our £830 million operating profit ambition by 2030”.GREEN = (Roland - I hold)
This Irish energy distribution group recently received a half-hearted takeover approach in April, but as Mark discussed, it fell well short of a reasonable price – the shares are now trading comfortably above the price offered.
Today’s results highlight the appeal of the core energy business, with adjusted operating profit up 3.5% to £554m. While I recognise some risks around DCC’s efforts to expand its lower-carbon offerings, the shares continue to look too cheap to me at current levels, even without factoring future growth prospects. This is a long-term holding for me and I am biased, but I continue to view this business as fundamentally undervalued by the market, so I’m leaving my positive view unchanged today.

Cranswick (LON:CWK) (£2.8bn | SR64)

Preliminary Results

Revenue +9.5%. Adjusted PBT +11.2% (£220m). Actual PBT +18.8% (£215.8m). "Trading in the early part of the current financial year has been in line with the Board's expectations.”
Shore Capital updated estimates:
- FY27E adj EPS: 312.5p (+1.8% vs 307.1p previously)
- FY28E adj EPS: 327.9p (+1.7% vs 322.4p previously)
AMBER/GREEN = (Roland) [no section below]
Not many companies can report 36 years of unbroken dividend growth, as food producer Cranswick does today. In a competitive and somewhat capital-intensive sector, I see this company as an excellent operator. Today’s results flag up continued investment in expanded facilities and reassure on profitability, with a return on capital employed of c.17%. This is consistent with mid-teens results in recent years and shows the company’s ability to expand by deploying capital at attractive rates of return. This is one of the factors that has driven the 140% share price growth over the last decade. Today’s upgrade from house broker Shore Capital is described as conservative and it probably is. But there are a number of potential headwinds out there and my feeling is that Cranswick’s share price is probably about right at the moment. For these reasons, I’m leaving my moderately-positive view unchanged.

Currys (LON:CURY) (£1.39bn | SR89)

Performance continues to strengthen (full year trading update)

LfL sales +4% for the 16-week period since “Peak” and for the full year. "Recent trading has been very solid; we've not yet seen an impact from the Middle East conflict, and our energy costs are well hedged for the coming year.”GREEN = (Roland)
A strong finish to FY26 suggests CEO Alex Baldock will leave on a high later this year, when he is due to become CEO of Boots. Shareholders may be sad to see him leave, but my impression is that he will leave behind a business that is genuinely better than the one he inherited and could continue to perform well. A FY27 P/E of 10 seems reasonable and I’m happy to maintain our positive view today following yet another earnings upgrade.

SSP (LON:SSPG) (£1.19bn | SR30)

2026 Half Year Results Announcement

Sales +6.2%. Net debt/EBITDA at 2.2x, expected to reduce by full-year. Adjusted operating profit +9.3% at actual FX rates to £50m, +17.8% at constant FX rates. Full year outlook: “The Group as a whole is currently trading solidly… our expectations for FY26 EPS remain within the market consensus range of 13.6p - 14.8p…”

Renew Holdings (LON:RNWH) (£703m | SR91)

Acquisition of EDES

£9m acquisition of Electricity Distribution Engineering Services Ltd, which is “a provider of high voltage engineering design services to the energy distribution market for both underground and overhead lines”.

Discoverie (LON:DSCV) (£662m | SR46)

Acquisition of 3Gmetalworx

Cash consideration of $67.5m, funded from DSCV’s existing debt facilities. 3Gmetalworx is “a North American-based designer and manufacturer of electromagnetic shielding products for the electronics industry.” DSCV buys a 90% stake, with management at 3G retaining 10%.

Dr Martens (LON:DOCS) (£622m | SR74)

FY26 Results

Revenue down 1.4% at constant currencies, but adjusted PBT up 61% to £55m. Without adjustments, actual PBT for the year is £32.7m (2025: £8.8m). “...our business is now well setup to deliver both our FY27 objectives and medium‑term targets."

AMBER ↑ (Graham)
I’m upgrading this turnaround story to neutral, as I think there are signs of a real recovery. One feature of the results that stands out to me is a material increase in margins (up by 120 basis points to 66.2%). This is a very high margin to start with, and the company is clearly intent on protecting it - a good sign of responsible management, in my view. The StockRanks call it "Contrarian", which makes sense.

Hilton Food (LON:HFG) (£486m | SR77)

AGM Trading Update

On track to achieve 2026 adjusted profit before tax in the range £60m-£65m.

Thor Explorations (LON:THX) (£473m | SR100)

First Quarter 2026 Financial & Operating Results

Q1: 15,417 ounces of gold sold (Q1 2025: 22,750) with an average gold price of US$4,820 (Q1 2025: US$2,720). Net cash $178m. Production guidance for FY 2026 of 75,000 - 85,000 oz with an AISC guidance of US$1,000 - $1,200.

C&C (LON:CCR) (£404m | SR82)

Final Results

Net revenue down 5.7%, adjusted operating profit down 6.6% (€70.5m). “Significant simplification activity was delivered across the business.” Outlook: Trading performance since the period end has been in line with expectations… we currently expect to meet full-year financial objectives.”

Avacta (LON:AVCT) (£387m | SR32)

Preliminary Full Year 2025 Results

“Increased momentum and strengthened position as a pure-play oncology biopharmaceutical company by focusing on the Company's unique proprietary pre|CISION® peptide drug conjugate platform, with significant progress in R&D programs.” Operating loss of £30.7m and after interest expense the loss before tax was £36.8m. Cash runway into early Q1 2027.

Luceco (LON:LUCE) (£378m | SR95)

Q1 2026 Trading Update

Organic revenue growth 11%. “...the strength of Q1 trading and sustained Energy Transition momentum mean expectations for full-year 2026 Adjusted Operating Profit now exceed £40m, with the potential for further significant outperformance dependent on Demand Flexibility.”GREEN ↑ (Graham)
Maybe Luceco is a higher-quality business than I’ve been giving it credit for? Especially with its foray into EV chargers. I’m upgrading it thanks to the upward trend in EPS forecasts that has been maintained today. This isn’t my typical GREEN: I’m simply noting the very strong momentum in the business. And it's a little expensive for what it is, but perhaps not yet excessively so. I wouldn’t upgrade it, if it was already at 20x earnings (currently at 14x).

Mears (LON:MER) (£343m | SR98)

Thurrock Council - £240m Contract Award

Mears will deliver all repairs, compliance and planned investment works. Contract valued at £24m/yr over five years, with an option to extend for a further five years.

Forterra (LON:FORT) (£315m | SR68)

AGM Trading Update

Trading conditions remain challenging, with LFL revenue -11%. Domestic brick despatches 11% in Q1. Outlook: elevated uncertainty means the range of full-year outcomes is greater than previously anticipated.

Victorian Plumbing (LON:VIC) (£258m | SR88)

Half-year Results

Revenue +10.5%, adj pre-tax profit down 20% to £9.4m. Outlook: expects full-year revenue and adj PBT in line with market expectations.

Empire Metals (LON:EEE) (£255m | SR5)

Execution of SPA for Eclipse Mining Lease

Sold Empire’s 75% interest in the Eclipse ML for A$750,000.

Winvia Entertainment (LON:WVIA) (£250m | SR47)

Final Results

Net revenue £170.3m (FY24: £38.1m), operating profit £12m (FY24: £5.9m). Net cash increased to £29.9m (2024: net debt £36.6m). Outlook: Q1 trading “strong”, on track to meet full-year expectations.

Capricorn Energy (LON:CNE) (£228m | SR98)

No intention to make an offer for Deltic Energy

Further to its announcement of 22 April 2026, Capricorn Energy confirms that it does not intend to make an offer for Deltic.

Jadestone Energy (LON:JSE) (£172m | SR70)

2025 Full-Year Results

Revenue +3% to $408m, with adj EBITDAX +20% to $153m and loss after tax of $110.7m. Production +6% to 19,829 boe/d. Stag field remains shut in. 2026 guidance unchanged (18-21k boe/d).

Crest Nicholson Holdings (LON:CRST) (£170m | SR46)

Revised date for the half year results

Remains in discussions with lenders regarding covenant relaxation. This is expected to conclude by mid-July 2026. Results are delayed to allow time for “the covenant reset process” and for audit review. H1 results now expected on 16 July 2026.

Regional REIT (LON:RGL) (£144m | SR46)

Q1 2026 Trading Update & Dividend Declaration

Sales proceeds of £12.6m in Q1. All were “close to” Dec 25 valuations. LTV reduced to 39.4% (2025: 40.4%). Completed 26 new lettings/renewals, adding £1.1m to rent roll at 9.8% above ERV.
Q1 portfolio occupancy 75.6% vs 78.9% one year earlier. Q1 dividend of 2.0p per share.

EKF Diagnostics Holdings (LON:EKF) (£116m | SR67)

AGM statement & positive Q1 trading update

Trading for the year ended 31 Dec 26 was in line with expectations. Currently on track to deliver FY26 revenue and adj EBITDA in line with expectations.

Topps Tiles (LON:TPT) (£67m | SR66)

Interim Financial Report

Pro forma revenue -0.2% with pre-tax profit down 74% to £0.5m. LFL revenue has turned positive during the first seven weeks of the second half. Outlook: expect full-year profit growth in line with market expectations.

Frenkel Topping (LON:FEN) (£62m | SR79)

Proposed Second Extension of Long Stop Date

Deadline for the completion of the takeover scheme has been extended from 29 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, subject to court approval. The reason for this is that change of control approval may not be obtained before 29 May 2026.PINK

Water Intelligence (LON:WATR) (£43m | SR70)

Q1 Trading Update

FY26 guidance is unchanged. Revenue +9%, with US B2B insurance and property management +16% and non-US +38%. Adj EBITDA +8% to $4.4m.

Novacyt SA (LON:NCYT) (£32m | SR25)

Launch of Yourgene Insight DPYD assay

Yourgene® Insight DPYD is a simple-to-use genotyping test that can identify cancer patients with Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency, which can cause severe and sometimes lethal side effects in patients being treated with chemotherapeutic drug 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU).

Tortilla Mexican Grill (LON:MEX) (£28m | SR80)

Update on FY25 Results and Current Trading

FY24/FY25 accounting adjustments: operating expenditure in France totalling up to £2.5m has been identified which was not expensed through the income statement during the relevant period. FY25 adj EBITDA now expected to be c.£1.5m, c.£2.5m lower than previously indicated.

Artisanal Spirits (LON:ART) (£22m | SR11)

AGM Statement

“Solid start to the financial year”, trading in line with expectations with FY26 guidance unchanged. Growth in US and Asia is helping to offset a slower start in Europe.

IXICO (LON:IXI) (£15m | SR18)

Interim results for six months ending 31/03/2026

Revenue +23%, gross margin improved to 53% (H1 25: 50%), EBITDA loss reduced to £0.5m. Order book +38% to £18.1m. Outlook: remain focused on delivering guidance for 15% revenue growth in full year.

EMV Capital (LON:EMVC) (£13m | SR25)

Final Results for the year ended 31 Dec 25 & Phantom Carried Interest Scheme

Fair value of investments +9% to £14.6m, with revenue +17% and group losses reduced to £0.6m (2024: £3.7m). PCI is a new long-term incentive scheme.

React (LON:REAT) (£11m | SR39)

Interim Results

Revenue +9%, adj EBITDA +7% to £1.5m. Net H1 net loss of £72k (1H25: £280k loss). Strong contribution from Aquaflow acquisition, stable workload, but decision cycles remain extended.

Graham's Section

IG group (LON:IGG)

Up 9% at £17.13 (£5.7bn) - AGM Trading Update - Graham - GREEN =

(At the time of writing, Graham has a long position in IGG.)

I should say up front that this is no ordinary holding for me - it’s 19% of my portfolio, a long-term holding, and a multibagger.

3-year chart:

64bd83a6-1ecb-4299-a911-7d8bacd8dac9.png

Today’s AGM update keeps the good news flowing:

  • Q1 organic revenue up 19% year-on-year to £331.2m (total revenue £340m)

  • Q1 organic first trades up 63% year-on-year, active customers up 12%

“​IG is establishing a powerful challenger position in stock trading and crypto” - ever since they created it, I’ve held the view that their share dealing product is excellent (a quality product offering excellent value), although it doesn’t create the rich profits that spread betting and CFDs can do with a smaller customer base.

Guidance:

​2026 guidance upgraded to organic total revenue growth of 10-15% on the 2025 base of approximately £1,100 million, ahead of prior guidance of high single-digits, with EBITDA margins sustained in a mid-40s percent range

So let’s provisionally call that an upgrade of c. 5% on revenues.

Medium-term guidance also improved:

​Medium-term outlook upgraded to at least 10% organic total revenue compound growth per annum beyond 2026 on the 2025 base, with EBITDA margins sustained in a mid-40s percent range

Looking back on prior updates, the company previously guided for “mid-to-high single-digit percentage annual organic total revenue growth” in the years following May 2026, i.e. 5% to 9% growth.

With new guidance for growth of 10%+, let’s call this a guidance upgrade of 3%+ on revenues for 2027 and beyond.

This is a business that thrives on financial volatility - one of the reasons I like having it in my portfolio. It’s a natural hedge, if you will. Because while the US-Iran conflict has inflicted enormous human costs, it has also triggered a surge in trading: IG notes that Q1 saw “elevated commodity market volatility driving higher activity among existing customers”.

The conflict began in late February/early March, and it’s pretty clear that April and May must have been strong too, considering the raised guidance for the year and for the medium-term. Indeed:

IG has continued to trade well in the first seven weeks of Q2 2026, with underlying commercial momentum continuing to build. First trades remained strong and the organic active customer growth rate has accelerated beyond 12% year-on-year.

Quarterly Divisional performance

Let’s quickly review the major sources of revenue:

  • The core business “OTC derivatives” saw a 26% year-on-year surge in revenues (£250.6m)

  • The much smaller “stock trading & investments” business grew 38% organically, or 79% if you include the acquisition of FreeTrade (£19.6m).

  • Exchange traded revenues were solid, up 7% year-on-year (£40.7m).

Meanwhile, lower interest rates were a drag on interest income (£26.6m).

Graham’s view

Personally, I’m comfortable with this being a very large position in my portfolio. At some point, I may need to trim it, but that time has not arrived yet.

The company’s success has been supported by a positive environment for trading platforms (see the likes of Plus500 (LON:PLUS)), but also by the company’s own strong execution and position.

The most recent wins have been on the marketing front - which caused the surge in “first trades” in Q1, and the upgrade of medium-term guidance:

Marketing efficiency is accelerating active customer growth, multi-product adoption is strengthening, and customer income retention is trending higher.

I have typically used multiple IG products at the same time, so I know all about “multi-product adoption” and how they package multiple account types together. It’s very smooth.

Indeed, they recently came back to Ireland with their share dealing product, having left us for a few years. I’ve witnessed first-hand some of their marketing strategies - including dropping free FTSE-100 shares into new customer accounts! A nice touch.

The ongoing Strategic Review is also very interesting. As I’ve said before, I think Breon Corcoran is going to consider some radical structural changes. He has done this successfully in the past - watch this space.

…the Board is conducting a strategic review which is evaluating routes to maximise shareholder value, including, but not limited to, acquisitions to accelerate growth, IG's domicile and listing venues to unlock capital and enhance strategic flexibility, and potential combinations of parts of the Group with other industry participants. The Group will present the outcome of the review at a Strategy Update in autumn 2026.

A simple change such as a US listing would be one way to boost the valuation - I’m sure that US investors would be very interested. Many of them will already know IG Group personally, e.g. due to its ownership of tastytrade.

Because the valuation is still not excessive, at least to my eyes, despite the company’s success. I can't imagine the stock trading at this multiple in the US:

ca536702-d83b-4417-b2e5-514aaf436314.png

Interactive Brokers (NSQ:IBKR), for example, trades on a P/E multiple of 32.7x, with forecast EPS growth in a similar ballpark.

Indeed, with enormous returns and margins, IG enjoys a QualityRank of 99, and is a Super Stock:

1c0affe3-3e59-48a9-acb1-4e6932ba6421.png

So what could go wrong?

  • Flat, boring markets would slow down trading activity (e.g. VIX below 15)

  • The company might overpay for a major acquisition, or get involved in a merger that doesn’t work.

  • Regulators might start to pick on the industry again. It has been 7 years since the last major overhaul.

Personally, I’m a very happy holder here, and excited about what IG might be able to achieve next.


Luceco (LON:LUCE)

Up 1% at 238p (£383m) - Q1 2026 Trading Update - Graham - GREEN ↑

It’s a very nice Q1 trading update from this company, upgrading expectations.

I think of it as a lighting company, but it also provides EV charge points. It refers to itself more broadly as “the leading designer and manufacturer of residential and commercial electrification products and systems”.

Key points:

  • Q1 revenue +11% organically to £68m

  • Core products +6%, and EV charging growth of 80%

The Middle East conflict hasn’t been a problem yet:

Luceco is maintaining its disciplined approach to pricing, working with our customers to pass through higher commodity costs. The direct impact of disruption linked to the conflict in the Middle East has been immaterial to date, and the Group remains well placed to manage its operations with appropriate resilience and contingency measures.

Net debt is £66m, with a leverage multiple of 1.4x (perfectly normal). They are open to doing "selective bolt-on acquisitions”.

Outlook: Q1 was ahead of management’s expectations, and they upgrade the full year forecast.

While the Board remains mindful of the broader economic backdrop, including the impact of the conflict in the Middle East, the strength of Q1 trading and sustained Energy Transition momentum mean expectations for full-year 2026 Adjusted Operating Profit now exceed £40m, with the potential for further significant outperformance dependent on Demand Flexibility.

They helpfully provide a consensus figure for adjusted operating profit: £38.3m. So they should beat this by at least 4%.

Estimates: the new EPS forecast from Longspur Research is 17.2p, putting the shares on a P/E multiple of just below 14x at the current share price.

Graham’s view

I’m torn on this one. I’ve always been hesitant to get too excited about anything that I consider to be a lighting business, as performance tends to be volatile.

But maybe Luceco is a higher-quality business than I’ve been giving it credit for? Especially with its foray into EV chargers.

More information on Demand Flexibility is available here.

In January, Mark noted the same themes as I have: very strong EV growth, with more modest growth from the other segments.

On balance, I am going to upgrade this to GREEN today, due to the upward trend in EPS forecasts that has been maintained today:

673a6d7e-9da3-4731-b1e2-aa6631f77727.png

However, I do want to add some disclaimers:

  • The stock is a little expensive for what it is. In general I would not be positive on a lighting company trading at 14x earnings.

  • The balance sheet is fine, but not strong enough for any major acquisitions or shareholder distributions.

  • The EV charging segment is probably still very small within the context of the group as a whole (c. 10% roughly?).

So this isn’t my typical GREEN. I’m simply noting the very strong momentum in the business, and taking our stance on Luceco up by one notch, while it lasts (which might only be 6-12 months). I wouldn’t do this if the stock was already at 20x earnings.

My view is consistent with the StockRanks:

7ddaef02-5d5f-40b2-a626-e8801fcb2a1d.png


Dr Martens (LON:DOCS)

Up 4% to 66.6p (£645m) - Preliminary Results - Graham - AMBER ↑

This is one of the higher-profile 2021 IPOs:

3f2c941d-49e2-410d-bade-9532671b9b1b.png

The shares have been in a 50p - 100p range for the last two years - maybe it’s bottomed out?

FY26 results:

  • Revenue £765m (-1.4% at constant FX), in line with guidance.

  • Adjusted PBT £55m (+58.9% at constant FX)

  • Actual PBT £32.7m (last year: £8.8m).

CEO Ije Nwokorie says “our focus on execution is paying off: we are improving the quality of revenues whilst strengthening margins, cash generation, the Balance Sheet and overall model resilience”.

Ije Nwokorie has an interesting CV. He was Chief Brand Officer for Dr Martens in 2024. He was previously a Senior Director at Apple, and before that spent 11 years at Wolff Olins (a name I remember for eliminating the vowels from Aberdeen - they did that after he left them).

Since taking over in January 2025, he has led the strategy to “stabilise, pivot and scale”. “Pivot” is still happening (to a more customer-centric model), but during the current financial year they will also enter the “scale” phase of the strategy.

Here’s what that means:

This does not mean volume at any cost. It means scaling higher-quality revenues and operational leverage, underpinned by a more resilient model. The desire for our brand is strengthening and we will leverage this momentum, increasing brand investment and delivering our improved retail strategy.
The retail strategy is centred on moving from a transactional one-size-fits-all model to a tiered retail estate which repositions retail as a growth engine, with investment in high potential stores.

The financial results for FY26 are indeed much improved on the prior year, which makes me inclined to think that this is more than just management-speak and might have real strategic substance.

The Outlook is very encouraging, too:

We achieved significant PBT growth in FY26 and plan to deliver further strong PBT growth in FY27, driven by operational leverage. Over the last two years we have put in the hard work to set the business up for growth, and as we look forward there are significant benefits as a result, including the quality of our revenue base through reduced discounting, the strength of our wholesale order books, the benefit from pricing, continued tight management of costs and the improvement in speed of execution from our new market model… our business is materially more resilient than it was previously and this underpins our confidence in our medium-term targets.

Graham’s view

I’m going to upgrade this to neutral, as I think there are signs of a real turnaround, and I don’t want us to be negative on it.

As an aside, I think the balance sheet looks ok: net debt (excluding leases) has reduced year-on-year from £94m to £70m, and guidance is for this to reduce further to £50m. Including lease liabilities, net debt is expected to finish next year at c. £200m (currently £213.5m).

Indeed, the company is comfortable paying an unchanged 2.55p full-year dividend.

One feature of the results that stands out to me is a material increase in margins (up by 120 basis points to 66.2%). This is a very high margin to start with, and the company is clearly intent on protecting it - a good sign of responsible management, in my view.

This could be a really interesting recovery - for now, I think a neutral stance makes sense.

The StockRanks call it "Contrarian", which makes sense:

428e6de7-a440-4bd8-bba6-f031d2c18436.png


Roland's Section

Currys (LON:CURY)

Up 11% at 140p (£1.54bn) - Performance continues to strengthen - Roland - GREEN =

While I think Currys’ habit of giving unconventional titles to its RNS announcements is a little annoying, I can’t fault the content of today’s update, which includes an upgrade to full-year profit guidance for the year ended 2 May 2026.

Today’s figures underline a strong finish to the year for the retailer:

  • Like-for-like sales +4% for both the full year and the 16-week period since the festive peak season. It’s good to see this has been maintained despite the tougher consumer environment.

  • Full year adjusted pre-tax profit expected to be around £191m, +18% vs £162m in FY25 (previously guided to £180-190m)

  • £74m of cash returned to shareholders during the year

  • Year-end net cash of more than £170m (FY25: £184m)

CEO Alex Baldock notes that the company has not yet suffered any adverse effects from geopolitical events:

Recent trading has been very solid; we've not yet seen an impact from the Middle East conflict, and our energy costs are well hedged for the coming year.

Trading across the group’s two geographic regions was positive, although it looks like operating margins came under greater pressure in the UK than the Nordics.

  • UK & Ireland: “adjusted EBIT expected to grow slightly” versus last year.

UK&I trading is said to have been “robust”, with market share gains and growth in services and business sales.

While Currys did face higher operating costs due to minimum wage growth and other factors, the company says that the impact was offset by sales growth and stable gross margins. In other words, price rises and/or volume growth led to higher gross profits, allowing operating profit to remain flattish.

Currys’ rejuvenated mobile offering, iD Mobile, saw particularly strong growth, with customer numbers up 18% to 2.6m.

  • Nordics: “adjusted EBIT showing strong growth YoY”. Gross margins were said to be “broadly stable” with costs “tightly controlled”.

The company has been gaining market share and expanding into new categories:

Recent growth driven by market share gains and very strong performance in Kitchens and new categories such as computing components.

Outlook & Estimates

Today’s upgrade continues a long run of increases over the last year:

d0c3ca52-d689-4c08-8028-c04a823cd886.png

With thanks to broker Panmure Liberum and Research Tree, we have access to updated forecasts this morning:

  • FY26E adj EPS: 13.2p (+3.1% vs 12.8p previously)

  • FY27E adj EPS: 13.8p (unch)

  • FY28E adj EPS: 14.7p (unch)

Leaving outer year forecasts unchanged at this point is understandable – there’s still considerable uncertainty about the macro outlook.

Recent share price weakness means that Currys is trading on a FY27E P/E of 10x after this morning’s gains:

b405b275-4990-4aa2-a9e5-6e0843fcb485.png

Roland’s view

I recently heard a well-known investor suggest that one test of a CEO is how the business performs after they leave – have they built a strong, well-functioning organisation? Tesco has performed very well following the departure of Dave Lewis, for example, but there are plenty of examples where the departure of a successful CEO coincides with the start of a period of weaker performance.

Currys CEO Alex Baldock is already working his notice, having announced his decision to leave in March. He’s since been appointed as the next chief executive of Boots, where he will take charge in the autumn.

Baldock has done a sterling turnaround job at Currys and the retailer’s shares fell on the day his departure was announced. Today’s trading update suggests he will be leaving on a high, but shareholders may be anxious lest the group’s improved performance falters following his departure.

I can’t be sure, but my impression is that Baldock has done much of the heavy lifting required to reshape and improve underperforming parts of Currys’ business. In my view, he is likely to leave behind a business that is genuinely better than it was before and should continue to function well.

Areas of notable improvement include a revamped mobile offering and the company’s consumer credit offering, which is now said to be making a useful contribution to group profits:

… we saw UK&I credit adoption climb +180bps YoY to 21.9%, more than double the adoption of four years ago, and we generated £1.1bn of UK&I sales on credit, making us one of the UK's leading brokers of retail credit. As well as additional sales, credit makes a direct profit contribution and as credit scales, we can use some of this profit to invest in the customer offer, driving further sales. We are now in that virtuous circle with credit. [FY25 results]

Mark maintained our positive view on Currys in March, suggesting that the business was still showing good fundamental momentum despite some share price weakness. The StockRank has also remained positive:

227dbfd2-751e-499b-9ed9-c32eacee29ef.png

Today’s update supports Mark’s conclusions and I see no reason to change our positive view today. The only caveat I’d add is that this will always be a low-margin, cyclically sensitive business – it’s not a stock for which I’d want to pay a high P/E multiple.


Diploma (LON:DPLM)

Up 4.8% at 6,940p (£9.3bn) - Half Year Results - Roland - AMBER/GREEN =

I have something of a soft spot for well-run distribution businesses. Diploma is a stock I wish I’d bought, well, almost anytime in the last 20 years:

fb464017-333a-4fd3-84ca-b9410fd3f3c1.png

Diploma supplies a huge range of technical products and value-added services to a range of industries. It’s expanded steadily for many years through a mixture of organic growth and bolt-on acquisitions – this is a market that naturally lends itself to consolidation.

Diploma’s share price has risen at a compound average of 21% per year since May 2006! That’s an incredible performance.

Let’s take a look at today’s half-year results

H1 results summary

Today’s figures cover the six months to 31 March. The headline numbers look very impressive to me and include a further upgrade to full-year revenue and profit guidance.

  • Revenue up 17% to £851.1m

  • Organic revenue growth: +15% (H1 25: +9%)

  • Adjusted operating profit up 33% to £208.9m

  • Statutory operating profit up 18.4% to £165.1m

  • Adjusted earnings up 36% to 109.2p

  • Interim dividend up 5% to 19.1p per share

  • Leverage: 0.8x net debt/EBITDA

Acquisition adjustments: Diploma’s adjusted operating profit for H1 is 26.5% (£43.8m) higher than its reported operating profit for the same period. I feel this is worth understanding.

The company’s policy on adjustments is fairly clear – everything relating to acquisitions is adjusted out. Here’s how this stacked up in H1:

  • Inventory fair value adjustments: £4m

  • Employee costs: £1.2m

  • Amortisation of acquired intangibles: £32.4m

  • Other operating expenses: £6.2m

I accept that it’s now normal to ignore the amortisation charge on acquired intangibles (even though they were probably paid for in cash), but personally I don’t think it’s appropriate to ignore post-acquisition remuneration/deferred consideration or operating expenses relating to the restructuring and integration of acquired businesses.

After all, acquisitions are a consistent part of Diploma’s business model – the company has done 57 deals since 2019 at a total cost of £1.6bn. In my view, this means that the costs associated with acquisitions should also be seen as a regular operating expense.

Investors can make their own choices on adjustments. My preference is generally to rely on statutory profits as I often find these correlate most closely to free cash flow.

That’s true here – my sums show free cash flow to equity of £100.5m in H1, a perfect match with reported net profit of £100.6m.

The good news is that however you look at Diploma’s profits, they rose ahead of revenue over the same period, resulting in an improvement in margins.

Profitability: even sticking with reported profits, the most conservative measure, my sums give an operating margin of 19.4% for H1, up from 19.1% for the same period last year.

Looking at returns on capital, my sums give me a very respectable trailing 12-month return on capital employed (ROCE) of 19.8%, based on average capital employed over the period.

Diploma reports a more heavily adjusted and favourable “return on adjusted trading capital employed” figure of 22.7% for H1, up from 19.1% in H1 25.

The important thing here, regardless of which measure we choose, is that Diploma is clearly able to deploy capital at attractive and sustainable rates of return, generating value for its shareholders.

Trading commentary

Diploma’s operations are grouped into three segments. Organic revenue growth was positive across all three, but there was one standout winner:

127ec67a-09c7-48ca-87f9-26088a75f6ff.png

  • Controls (adj op profit +45% to £165.7m): “[...] excellent execution in favourable market conditions”. Management cite sectors including aerospace, defence and data centres. It looks to me like this business is among the indirect beneficiaries of the AI data centre boom.

  • Seals (adj op profit unch. at £42.5m): conditions are said to remain challenging in a number of international markets, notably the UK, where construction, oil and gas and agriculture are all highlighted, together with infrastructure project delays.

  • Life Sciences (adj op profit +18% to £25.9m): organic growth remained positive despite “challenging healthcare markets”. Recent acquisitions added 14% to revenue during the period and have strengthened the group’s footprint in the Nordics, UK and Ireland.

Outlook

Diploma has provided upgraded full-year guidance today, based on improved expectations for both organic growth and the contribution from acquisitions:

  • Organic revenue growth: 12% (previously 9%);

  • Acquisitions have added 6% to growth so far (previous guidance 3%);

  • Guidance for an (adjusted) operating margin of c.25% is unchanged, implying operating profit growth of c.30%;

  • This implies a 6% upgrade to consensus operating profit, which the newswire tells me was previously £428m.

I estimate a new consensus operating profit of £454m. I estimate this could drop out to give a revised adjusted earnings per share forecast of 235p – about 5% ahead of previous consensus of 224p.

As with Currys earlier, this is the latest in a string of upgrades for Diploma over the last year:

688296f6-3365-48d8-8578-f7ea36d26606.png

Roland’s view

Diploma’s share price is up by c.5% as I write, so my revised earnings estimate (also up 5%) gives an unchanged forward P/E of around 29x.

2790b7b1-aaa5-4da7-9b20-0ed9fad6758d.png

The shares are obviously not cheap, but very strong profit growth in recent years means Diploma’s P/E rating has actually moderated since 2020:

1dbd9d6a-0568-4923-a004-dc5a6527dc24.png

Taking a longer-term view, I estimate the current P/E is probably roughly in-line with the stock’s 10-year average.

Should I buy the shares at current levels and tuck them away for another decade? Perhaps I should, but I just can’t bring myself to do that.

Using today’s results, I estimate a trailing 12-month free cash flow yield of under 3%.

Another measure I like to use, the EBIT/EV yield, is just 3.2%.

Continued strong growth may allow Diploma shares to grow into these valuations. But for me, the price is just a little too steep. I also note that ahead of today, earnings growth was expected to slow to just 4% next year.

I think this is an excellent business with strong management. But rightly or wrongly, I’m going to leave my view unchanged at AMBER/GREEN today. I think this is a fair reflection of the quality and valuation of this business.

This view is also reflected in Diploma’s StockRank and High Flyer styling, which flag up the poor value metrics on offer here:

4d648979-7d89-4c8f-a1fd-075ec489fac8.png


DCC (LON:DCC)

Up 1.9% at 6,060p (£5.2bn) - Results for the year ended 31 March 2026 - Roland - GREEN =

(At the time of writing, Roland has a long position in DCC.)

This Irish energy distribution group recently received a half-hearted takeover approach in April, but as Mark discussed, it fell well short of a reasonable price – the shares are now trading comfortably above the £58 per share offered.

29c2630f-28b5-46b3-9f44-00af31b95e8f.png

Today’s results highlight the appeal of the core energy business, in my view, with adjusted operating profit up 3.5% to £554m.

bf8a7e6f-5496-4f61-a3ca-dd22b234ca1f.png

Source: DCC FY26 results

Dividend: there’s also a welcome 5% dividend increase while maintaining 2x dividend cover. DCC reminders investors that it has achieved 32 years of unbroken dividend growth at a compound annual rate of 12.7%.

Energy review: the core Energy Products business supplies gas, road fuels and products such as heating oil to customers in a range of markets. Performance was robust last year, with profits up on improved margins, despite slightly lower volumes:

01ab469c-acb8-4293-b12e-e01d628b33a7.png

The main area of weakness was the Energy Services unit, where adjusted operating profit fell by 68% to just £16m.

This unit provides sustainable solutions (e.g. solar) and related energy management services for (mostly) business customers. Management notes that in a tough business environment, “discretionary sustainability spend” fell sharply last year, but they expect a recovery over time and are continuing to position for this.

Energy Services consists of a number of businesses that have (largely) been acquired in more recent years as DCC has positioned itself for a lower-carbon future. Last year’s weakness reflects my main concern about this business – that low–carbon solutions will not prove as profitable or predictable as the core gas and fuel oil supply business.

Outlook

Management also confirms that the final part of the DCC Technology business is now up for sale, with a buyer expected to be found by the end of calendar 2026. This will complete the simplification of this business to an energy-only operation, reflected in today’s name change announcement.

There’s no explicit FY27 guidance today, but CEO Donal Murphy does reiterate guidance for a 2030 adjusted operating profit of £830m.

Roland’s view

It’s long been clear that the Energy unit is DCC’s most profitable, capable of delivering double-digit returns on capital and strong cash flows.

Using FY26 profit from the Energy business alone, I estimate DCC trades with an EBIT/EV yield of over 9%. Adding in the discontinued Technology business (now up for sale) makes this even cheaper.

Looking further ahead, if the company can achieve its goal of £830m in operating profit by 2030, then I think it’s fair to suggest DCC shares could trade at a materially higher valuation.

I recognise that I am biased, as this is one of my larger, long-term shareholdings. But I continue to view DCC as fundamentally undervalued by the market, so I’m leaving my positive view unchanged today.

Disclaimer

This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

62 comments


Avatar for Jeremy Rea

FAO Roland, 

I suspect you may have a typo in your DCC write up.

"Management also confirms that the final part of the DCC Technology business is now up for sale, with a buyer expected to be found by the end of calendar 20256."

I know some company management can be slow moving, but taking eighteen thousand years to sell something!? ;-)

1
Avatar for Graham Neary

thanks Jeremy, I've fixed that! G

1
Avatar for littledavesab

After swearing off junior miners about 15 years ago I found Thor Explorations (LON:THX) interesting to have a look at.   Has some cash, some decent (but reducing)production.   Interrogated RNS's using Claude - saves a lot of time.  - selected extracts follow:  We (Claude with prompts) managed to go from an initially optimistic view and crediting management for"building Nigeria's first large-scale commercial gold mine from scratch is not a small feat, and he has done it with a relatively modest balance sheet and no major disasters along the way. "    and "as a gold bull, the unhedged nature of Thor's production is important — the company's unhedged gold production uniquely positions it for rapid earnings growth and outsized margin expansion if gold prices rise further"

Pushing Claude further:  RNS announcements scanned 6,   Positive phrases found 47, Negative / cautionary phrases 8,   Sentiment ratio ~6:1 pos/neg

Total commitments 14, Already delivered 3, Watch: slipped once 2, Pending — due soon 9

The single most important thing to watch    
The Douta FID has already slipped once — from H1 to H2 2026. This is a government-dependent milestone (the mining convention) so another slip is possible. If the FID slips to 2027, first gold at Douta moves from early 2028 to potentially 2029, which materially changes the growth story. Watch every RNS for the phrase "mining convention" — its absence from an update is itself a signal.

However the cash position is worth noting 24.7m in Q1 2025 and has reached $177.9m by Q1 2026, so I asked Claude if they can be self financing or...

The self-financing question is genuinely interesting. Your instinct is right that they're working towards it, and at current gold prices the maths is plausible. Thor intends to fund construction using existing cash reserves and project financing, and states it is in discussions with potential funding parties, with a comprehensive financing strategy to be communicated alongside the Douta Investment Decision. That last phrase is important — they haven't yet told shareholders how much will be debt versus equity versus purely internal, and that announcement is the one that matters most for existing shareholders. Investegate

The key tension to watch: the self-financing story depends on gold staying elevated throughout an 18-month construction period. If gold weakens, Segilola cash flow shrinks, the buffer disappears, and some form of project financing (debt or equity) becomes necessary. The company's stated position is that its financial position supports planned exploration programmes and potential development decisions at Douta and Segilola underground whilst providing returns to shareholders — but note the word "potential" — it's deliberately hedged. The 26 May investor webinar would be an ideal moment to press them directly on what financing scenarios they've stress-tested

>  My end view - its interesting but a reminder how complicated investing in miners is.   I can understand why some would just stick to following charts or trading sentiment.   Would need to be stacked up against similar research on similar stocks before going further.   Stockrank info positive however at 100 !

4
Avatar for AcornInvestor

* should say "reasonable quantity", not quality 

0
Avatar for AcornInvestor

Fantastic report today thanks Graham and Roland, with quality companies big enough to trade in reasonable quality and focus on the good Greens not the rubbish Reds.

5
Avatar for Martin Verlaine

IG is after the recent rise one of my larger holdings ( I would never go near 20% for one holding, personally)  and I have resisted top slicing given I have liked acquisitions such as Tasty. Not sure the time has arrived given the rating is still, on a comparable basis quite low,  to top slice although I can understand why some would and the yield is now much lower.  I originally bought into this after meeting and liking the management and its tech ( then) was top notch. I had an account with them and in truth only left because I consolidated with one provider. Frankly, I suggest that most are leaving HL given the charges for ISAs are trebling for no Fund investors ( like me) and with this type of volume of transfers given the antiquated processes endowed by HMRC rules it is hardly unexpected that capacity constraints arise. IG charge very little and at some stage buyer beware arises on low cost services. 

HL were always pretty dire on ISA transfers so no surprise this has not changed. Likely some blame on both sides.  

1
Avatar for Albertos

Princes (LON:PRN)

13% down on CEO exit? Seems a bit excessive. One man does not make an organisation.

Anyway, bought a few to see how it pans out. 

Any thoughts?

A.

2
Avatar for bohenie

Its smells fishy to me - the news breaking at mid-day to escape early scrutiny and the CEO not actually retiring (he's 54) and so soon after the IPO - I can understand the Mkt reacting negatively Oh and whilst one man should not make an organisation - One man often does. Just look at Volex (LON:VLX) and Next (LON:NXT)

0
Avatar for planetx

Oops here 

Dear Dave san,

OHGI informed that they are obliged to set the new prices from new orders.

When we receive your next order, they will estimate the best prices considering all conditions at the time.

As the economic situation is changing rapidly, they are not able to release the new prices now which won’t be effective soon.

The current elements that they are facing are as below -

• Soaring prices of aluminum and brass materials

• Rising prices of resin materials (naphtha) due to unstable crude oil imports

• Shortages of paints, thinners, and other solvents at painting and plating companies

• Price increases for components used in polishing processes

• Price increases for auxiliary materials (inner boxes, outer boxes, plastic bags)

• Freight rate increases due to the introduction of surcharges

• Price increases for pad printing inks and solvents

Please be advised the above in advance.

We will anyway present the best prices for any new order.



12
Avatar for Lochinver

Have you read the guardian article today about how the Orang-utans are being steadily wiped  out by palm oil plantations in Borneo and Sumatra, which i believe you are an advocate of and investor in ? It would be interesting to get your comments.

0
Avatar for sevenccc

I think you have that the wrong way round Lochinver. Planetx seems pretty hostile to the palm oil boys on my reading of his posts. No doubt he'll chastise you gently in his usual Yorkshire direct style in due course.

3
Avatar for planetx

Rinse and repeat this round the world in every bit if every supply chain . 
received this yesterday from a Japanese bicycle bell

1
Avatar for ezlifeme

Re Transfers - They are all alike and they play on you just accepting (like annual insurance auto renew).

Just before I retired recently I consolidated several defined contribution workplace pensions into one fund. They were all decent amounts. One was transferred within 48 hours, this let me use it as an example to another where they "stole" my fund immediately to run their own business and transferred the amount 20 working days later, despite me chasing daily. I am sure if the markets had crashed in that time they would have paid quickly.

I complained to the FCA  and was paid compensation for the uninvested period although never given a breakdown or explanation of the amount paid. The FCA wouldn't push them to explain their calculation. I complained again via the FCA stating that the failing should be accepted and the FCA "Ought" to ensure they changed practice in future as it seemed an unfair practice that could affect many others. That follow up resulted in an "unsolicited, without prejudice" (GO AWAY), final offer.  

MOTTO - Always fight the "HOLDING" letter you receive in reply from large organisations.       Anything for an ezlifeme

11
Avatar for Mark Carter

Some cracking results from quality companies today: CWK, DPLM, IGG (I hold). After a disasterous day in the market for me yesterday, these shares have been snatched victory from the jaws of defeat. 

DPLM still powering ahead. I did some heavy top-slicing yesterday due to its position size in my portfolio and valuation. It's a hard decision to make. It's a question of trying to balance risk and reward, not knowing if you'll rewarded or punished before the fact. 

My decision not to take profits on III, for example, meant I gave up a substantial chunk of my gains. 

CWK is on a fwd PE of 16.8. Not cheap, but a hold at these levels, IMO. It's rare to find high-quality shares in the bargain bucket. 

IGG has a P/FCF of around 10 (I'm not sure, this site seems to be acting up at the moment). That's cheap, has good returns on capital and has quite a good growth record. So  I'm not surprised that the shares are up. On the subject of stockbrokers ...

There's a guy called Michael on YT who seems to be a regular trader. He's consistently rated IGG as his favourite platform.

I do use IG as a platform. They used to have custody fees, which put me off. They've been scrapped, so they're back in my good books again.

Hargreaves have introduced custody fees, so I'm looking to jettison them soon.

Recently, I've opened accounts with IB (InteractiveBrokers), Lightyear and Trading212 to spread my risks in case of default and just explore them generally. I'm not especially comfortable with nominee accounts. If something goes wrong, the shares are pooled. When you think about it, it's a bit primitive in these days of technology where it should be cheap to have the shares with title.

Lightyear doesn't do AIM shares, which makes it a little limiting. Its stock screener isn't great, but you can filter on 10-year revenue, dividend and EPS growth, which is useful. You can also filter on ROE and a few other stats. Like I say, it isn't great, but it has some merit.

Trading212 seems generally OK. No stock screener of any worth, but it's a site that I've heard a lot of people talking about positively.

IB has a long pedigree and get a good rating. I'm likely to move my Hargreaves shares over to them. IB is often cited as a platform that it difficult to understand, but I've played around with it, and it seems straightforward enough to me. I just want to buy and sell shares, nothing fancy, and it seems well up to the job.

AJ Bell has custody fees, so they're a "no" from me. 

I think there are some gotchas that folks need to watch out for: custody fees, any transfer fees for moving out of a platform, and an ability to transfer shares. Moving from IB to Lightyear is apparently seamless and cost-free. Moving from IB to Trading212 seems a little fraught, from what I can gather. Moving from IB to IG is seamless and cost free, but with a few technical caveats.

Some of the problems seem to stem from where the company is domiciled and some particular mechanisms through which the shares are held. 

So, something to think about when a choose a platform in the first place. It's not something that is widely discussed
11
Avatar for Bouden54

I use AJ Bell and the custody fees (they call them 'account charges') are £3.50 a month for the ISA account - not sure what the other platforms charge but that seems incredibly cheap to me

16
Avatar for Revs8

The AJBell fees are trivial if your trades are of any significance. £3.50 per trade. 

Annual custody fees are capped. I have done comparisons and they are as cheap as it gets. Only other contender is Interactive Investors. 

My only gripe with AJBell is the 0.5% FX charge for trading in or out of US stocks. ii allow you to hold USD so only one transfer in and out charge (0.75% I believe). Although it still didn't make sense to switch because AJBell are so cheap on all the other charges. 

I've also checked the AJBell prices offered compared with Trading View and they are spot on the current price. I have heard that other platforms do not always give the best price.

When you compare the platform charges to bid ask spreads and tax they are often insignificant. There are many other factors that are often more important. 

11
Avatar for SCI20

I have just received my annual statement of cost and charges from AJB on my pension account. The portfolio is currently 40% ETFs, 32% equities, 28% bonds & cash. Total fees are 1.25% pa over a period of significant outperformance. I recognise the fees are on the high side but this is a product of applying more momentum trades. Ed highlights the importance of momentum in his post today and given the volatility and unpredictability of markets it does seem to me that having an active approach is essential.  I would be interested to hear what others think. is 1.25% excessive (I want to be at under 1%)  or a necessary by product of being agile? 

1
Avatar for Bouden54

Not sure why your fees would be anywhere near that high with AJ Bell. I am charged £3.50 per trade and £3.50 per month account charge - basically de minimis for a reasonable sized portfolio. If anything it's pesky stamp duty that really eats into my returns!I know they do charge extra for funds, which I never hold myself, but for individual shares they are certainly not expensive. 

2
Avatar for SCI20

Transaction charges account for 1.1%. 

0
Avatar for Bouden54

OK that makes sense - you seem to trade quite a lot! Possibly one of the spread betting platforms might be more cost effective if you're a frequent trader? Platforms are more designed for buy and hold investors rather than traders. As well as trading fees you also need to consider stamp duty and bid/offer spreads  

0
Avatar for bohenie

I gave up comparing platform fees long ago - Yes, I’m sure I could go elsewhere and ‘save’ money but more important is the performance of my investments.   £3.50 or even £9.99 per deal makes little difference if invested successfully - and if there is a query - I can talk to real people in the UK call centre. Ive had the odd instance where the online platform has not been working and they put me through to the dealing desk yet apply the much lower online fee.  As has been said already - the  stamp duty of 0.5% is more concerning esp when ETFs can be bought tax free.  The one thing I have often wondered - do some platforms offer better prices than others.  HL try to make out they do - but has this been tested and confirmed?  

5
Avatar for ACounsell

Agree regarding AJ Bell. Their service is excellent and well worth the charges. Even with a few funds and investment trusts in my holdings as well as individual stocks, corporate bonds and gilts the overall charge is  around 0.5% of the portfolio value. Pretty sure that if you got a wealth manager to handle your investments in would be significantly higher than this.  I accept that there is a risk element of 'all eggs in one basket' but AJ Bell looks to be a pretty well run company and the financial metrics are strong.  

2
Avatar for Thatmanrobert

Exit transfers period as well at HL if trading actively and coverage range which is well covered for investors by St Jamess Place (LON:STJ) and comes with a human moat/front

0
Avatar for EdmondJ

At least with AJ Bell it is possible to speak with someone which is particularly important where a SIPP is concerned. With IG and after 24 hours I am now in a WhatsApp queue given an 'aim to reply within 12 hours' response. 

1
Avatar for planetx

House Builders  - dead men walking ?

Not posted for ages .

Is there ANY hope for housebuilders ? 

Looks to be as good as finished for them,  I  did call it a year or so ago but there were counter points of cyclical upside etc but honestly looks a mathematical fact the sector is screwed .

As is of the course the British economy and the pound and the country as a whole,  with the possible ex eption of filtronic !

Housebuilders  cannot build a house for below the price they can sell it .

Their balance sheets are proppped up by inflated land values that need to deflate so that houses become sellable 

Hard to see the government doing anything to support and why ahould they 

All construction costs increasing very quickly now .

i had a japanese supplier remove all export pricing yesterday citing  basically they have lost control of all input pricing .

Sector looks  like there is no positive outcome .


Great to be back spreading the good news .



35
Avatar for Rusty2

"Hard to see the government doing anything to support and why ahould they"

Yet the government promised loads of new houses. I suppose they will just get rid of Starmer and blame him. 

4
Avatar for Crusty

Stamp duty has a lot to answer for. Certainly stops us downsizing; which stops someone moving to larger house: which stops new-build selling etc. 

18
Avatar for Mark Carter

Govt's are in a pickle wrt house prices. They want them high because people hate being underwater with their equity; and they want them low, so people can afford them. Try squaring that circle!

They need to make more land available, scrap stamp duty, and reduce red tape. The fees on planning permissions seem to just go up and up. They need to sort that out. Simplify!

They also need to stop stuff like mandating "social housing". That's commie-talk. "The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design," and all that jazz (Friedrich Hayek).

I fear that Labour view socialism as something akin to violence: if it's not working then you're not using enough of it.

Although to be fair, what that orange pillock on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean is doing is certainly making things 10 times worse than they would be otherwise. 

Let's see if this post puts me on the naughty step. We're all card-carrying capitalists here so I think I might get away with it.

Update: One thing I'll add is that landlords seems to be getting nervous about new legislation protecting renters. So we could see landlord properties entering the market. I'm guessing that this will be a net negative for renters, despite the extra protections they'll be afforded. If unemployment spikes and interest rates stay high, then we may see a housing slump. Landlords dumping their properties on the market will only steepen the problem. I hasten to add that it is purely speculation at this point, though.

16
Avatar for Bouden54

One way to square that circle is for the government to offer some sort of contribution for first time buyers on a low income, or possibly just exemption from stamp duty.  

1
Avatar for philg2

I have two friends who separately have rented their existing property for over 10 years and both have been served notice in the past 2 months. One landlord owned 7 properties and the other 9. On supply and demand, rents are only going to go one way. 

4
Avatar for GN100

Don't show US immigration your post if you want an easy passage!!

'what that orange pillock on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean is doing is certainly making things 10 times worse than they would be otherwise'.

1
Avatar for littledavesab

On top of the Renters Rights bill,  Landlords will also be hit by 2%  personal tax increase wef  April 2027 .    Dont think many have spotted that yet.

3
Avatar for Bouden54

It would need some sort of government intervention/stimulus programme to kickstart the sector. Actually surprised the government has not done anything given housebuilding is such a central pledge of their manifesto - perhaps the next PM will announce something? This seems the easiest way to get the economy moving due to the powerful multiplier effects.

In terms of land values, yes these would need to adjust down to make housebuilding profitable (assuming build costs remain high and house prices stagnant).  Not an expert on the sector but my understanding is many HBs hold land options which allows the price to be adjusted down in this scenario. I'm not sure how this would affect their NAVs.

5
Avatar for planetx

Many cant allow the NAV to drop as then banking covenants probably get nervous

big stack of cards 

4
Avatar for The Boon Fund

So your point.... that all housebuilders are finished.... 

Implies we won't need any new housing built in the future?

Or is your point actually more nuanced. By "finished" you mean "very difficult, almost impossible conditions for the next 1-2 years" but after it might normalise.

------------

My counter-argument, long-term, on the inflation point:

If there is inflation, then there will be wage growth.

House prices (in most part of the country) tied to wages, given the mechanisms of rent, mortgage affordability criteria, and demand outstripping supply structurally.

Therefore house prices will keep up with inflation at least, over a 5-15 year period. Might not in a 0-5 year period with increasing inflation, I accept.

Land banks can be sat on till property values catch up to make the margins work.

Housebuilders can also just pay less for new land going forwards, to preserve margins. Easy to do so; for major plots of land, its a "cartel" of housebuilders out there. Quite incestuous too, with people moving around companies, all good friends/acquaintances in a tight/close industry.

11
Avatar for doctor dave

Great to hear from you planetx. Must be approaching "buy" territory sometime in the next year, then? 

2
Avatar for Epitychia

It is strange to me that a housebuilder can sell a poor quality house for £400k and still not make a profit! 

What is going on? 

10
Avatar for Martin Verlaine

If you look at the macro conditions for House builders it is universally bleak. The sector needs Gov't support to sell a lot of their houses at anything approaching a decent margin-will Rachel from accounts deliver? 

The messiah ( Andy Burnham) says a sustained programme of social housing is one of his major policies and in truth this is correct. The current Labour incumbent has an incoherent building policy as his targets are hopeless unsustainable and Housebuilders just will not build on land if there is no margin. I commented on the accident prone Vistry and one does wonder about its liquidity. Yes we have been here before and at some stage there will be a reckoning i.e the share prices will fall to a level where there is a profitable trade to be had When that is I could not say but my view is the next few weeks will be uncomfortable for the sector 

2
Avatar for grumpy5

Luceco (LON:LUCE) worth some comment please Graham. A classic play on a picks & shovels approach to AI. High SR, another upward nudge to forecasts. I hold.

15
Avatar for iwright7

Worth noting that Luceco (LON:LUCE) passes the difficult to pass Richard Driehaus and William O'Neil CAN-SLIM Growth screens, but is a modest 47 V Rank.    Too cheap for growth?

8
Avatar for Bouden54

Not sure if I would class Lucecco as an AI picks and shovels play - the big growth right now seems to be EV chargers, while their core product is lighting and electric switches.

4
Avatar for EdmondJ

Another bullish update from IG Group IGG and 7% initial rise in the shares to an all-time high. One wonders if there will be any inflection point at all wrt the terrible customer service with complaints spilling onto Trustpilot, some clients saying they cannot understand how a regulated company is allowed to act like this. I opened an account but having also tested IG customer 'service' myself am reticent to transfer an ISA.

IG Reviews | Read Customer Service Reviews of ig.com

Raxa ShahGB•1 review9 hours ago

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

ISA transfer


I opened an account on 13 March requesting an ISA transfer from my current provider. On 14 April, i received an email stating that IG have received a valuation from my current provider. However , this was over 4 weeks ago and the transfer is still pending and I have no updates from IG regarding the transfer. Since requesting the transfer over 2 months ago, I do not know the status of the transfer. This is somewhat disappointing to say the least. Think twice before you move to IG!!

UsefulShareMoreno/MarkPH•5 reviews14 hours ago

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

I have absolutely bad experience with…

I have absolutely bad experience with IG. I have few other investment platforms but IG, I will avoid at all cost.

very bad customer service, nobody seems to be keen to resolve your query. agents give false reassurance. takes a long time to have 1 issue resolved.

my story is I have been chasing for my account to be credited with referral reward. IG says in 60 days you will be rewarded but we are now heading to 80 days and still no reward.

I have chased with them. Agents confirmed that I met all the criteria and I will get the reward, but it has been two weeks and still no reward.

I will make a formal complaint and ask them into writing their explanation for failing with everything they promised.

UsefulShareNickGB•46 reviews15 hours ago

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

IG are a dreadful company.

IG have simply the worst customer service I have experienced in 50 years with any company.

Their customer service/support ranges from abysmal to non-existent.Their Chat Line and WhatsApp functions are totally useless as they are run by robots.No human contact is possible.

I am in the middle of transferring shares from Hargreaves Lansdown to IG.The form was sent over a month ago to IG and they have repeatedly advised me that they are progressing the transfer but HL were not responding.

I find out from Hargreaves Lansdown that they only received the transfer form a couple of days ago.In other words IG have been repeatedly lying to me for over a month.

I have emailed the Chief Executive Officer Breon Corcoran three times but he refuses point blank to engage with me.Similarly their Help Desk and Compliance division do not respond at all.

Their no fee share dealing is great (lots of other companies do it also) but their customer support is utterly attrocious.They are uncaring apathetic lazy and completely dysfunctional.This rotten behaviour from a major FTSE company is simply astonishing.

It is apparent that no fees dealing from IG also comes with zero customer service.

10
Avatar for The Boon Fund

As a marketer, I rarely trust any reviews on Trustpilot. Why?

It is either:

  • Really disgruntled customers, and every business has them. Especially one like IG, where they are so lean cost that the "edge cases" will definitely not be dealt with quickly.
  • "Nudged" glowing 5 star reviews driven by the mechanisms of the Trustpilot plans for businesses.
  • Most happy customers, unless they received exceptional service, don't immediate think "I know! My ISA transferred within the time frame successfully. I've gotten what I expected. I'll take my own initiative to go on Trustpilot to leave a 4 or 5 star review"
18
Avatar for EdmondJ

Have you actually tried to ring them and succeed to get through?

4
Avatar for The Boon Fund

I have not had to ring them because I'm a happy IG customer for 6+ years, and not in the edge case of when things go wrong.

I'm not claiming that they are brilliant when things go wrong. I fully expect them not to be great. But I accept it because of the low cost.

6
Avatar for Rusty2

But is it IG group (LON:IGG) that is the problem? When l did a transfer from HL, it was terrible. I blame the problems on HL, they just tried to delay it as long as possible. No updates from and them and they refused to give me a contact.

5
Avatar for boringchess

Indeed when I did my transfer out of HL it was awful and 100% their fault. They even closed the transfer as 'finished' after transferring a portion of my money and when I asked them what was going on with the transfer they said "What transfer? We don't have a record of one". Eventually I managed to get them to relinquish their hold of my money but they made it as hard and slow as they could, somewhat suspiciously almost exactly as the new quarter rolled around they finally became helpful and made the transfer happen...

As for IG, I am a small time shareholder now having heavily sliced a large position I had that had been on a hell of a run, guess I should have held on.

3
Avatar for EdmondJ

Again, the test piece is whether one can get to speak with anyone in a financial services organisation, when an issue ultimately arises (which inevitably it will). A year or so ago this was possible at IG, now it is a chat bot or e-mail takes some days to reply if at all. So I think one has to question, does such an organisation merit allocating significant capital to? Otherwise IG's share dealing platform is fine though has no special edge for execution on rivals. If one was to end up with a time-consuming problem, one's got oneself to blame given IG's shortcomings are being made clear. Also raises a general question as to how signifcant is customer service to long-term financial success of a business? IG is pulling in funds with its various cash-back offers and saturation media advertising but will that reach an inflection point given it has cut back on service? These seem perfectly reasonable questions both for signing up to IG services and appraising its shares. 

5
Avatar for Epitychia

Yup had a short side spreadbet with IG. Company went bust and IG  would not close the short because the liquidation was not finished. Continued to charge short fees. This went on for FOUR years. 

Eventually closed the short after i threatened to complain to FCA. 

I dont do any short side spreadbetting anymore, a big loss of profits for IG. 

4
Avatar for ctoman

Diploma (LON:DPLM) - looks like another set of great results - looking at the long term graph it's what Vectorvest (a sort of US Stockopedia) would call a ruler stock - i.e. going up in a straight line.

59976524-ce54-44a6-a3a5-f65d22871390.png

7
Avatar for abtan

Diploma (LON:DPLM)

For any Diploma fans out there, I really enjoyed this 13 minute presentation from the CEO from a couple of months ago:

https://www.redeye.se/video/ev...


For anyone interested in Nordic market (+ a few other countries e.g. Australian) serial compounders, you might also like some of the other presentations from that event:

https://www.redeye.se/events/1...

You will need an account, but this is free to setup.

A

1
Avatar for ctoman

Tortilla Mexican Grill (LON:MEX) - doesn't look good with accounting issues in the French business - quite odd given that the previous CEO was an accountant - though he did depart rather swiftly a few months ago. I'm thinking there could be quite a hit on the SP today...even though the UK business looks as though its on a roll.

1
Avatar for marc_brotherton

IG group (LON:IGG) delivered a strong first quarter and upgraded guidance

17
Avatar for Eric Ford

DccDCC (LON:DCC) figures today has a ranking of 95 and has had a bid approach

2
Avatar for eggbaconandbubble

Good morning!

I'm surprised you have never featured  Lancashire Holdings (LON:LRE) in your Daily Stock Market report. It's a FTSE 250 constituent with a very handsome yield circa 15+% . The special divis that provide the yield now seem to be a certain fixture going forward. As an insurance/re-insurance company  the Health Trend/Bankruptcy Risk must rank well and the share price has remained within in a reasonable range for several years. I hold.


51
Avatar for Graham Neary

eggbaconandbubble, I was putting customer money into Lancashire Holdings over 10 years ago, in my old job! I'd be very happy if we received lots of requests to cover stocks like this. Glad to know there are a few who are interested!

50
Avatar for spmarriott

I hold and am interested in coverage if possible. Thank you 

8
Avatar for Simon

Lancashire Holdings (LON:LRE) gets a plus one from me Graham. I always value your analytical of financial stocks.

4
Avatar for Subparstockpicks

Was just looking at this the other day, I'd be very happy if you started covering it! 

0
Avatar for FREng

Why is Stockopedia quoting the imminent final dividend in dollars ?  Lancashire Holdings (LON:LRE)

1
Avatar for eggbaconandbubble

The divi is paid in the dollar amount and arrives in sterling at the exchange rate on that day. ie. one doesn't know the exact amount until it arrives. I hope that makes sense!

7
Avatar for Threepeat

Yes please

And coverage of another non life insurer on the rise after the California fires Conduit Holdings (LON:CRE)

2
Get the free newsletter