How can you profit from stocks at risk of a 'short squeeze'?
Identifying stocks that are overvalued and betting that they’ll fall in price is one of the most extreme brands of value investing out there, and for short sellers that were active ahead of the the 2008 market crash it was also one of the most profitable. But while tireless research into overstretched stocks can produce sizeable returns when they collapse, getting it wrong or seeing the market turn against you can lead to a dreaded short squeeze. Despite being a byword for panic for canny individual investors a short squeeze can actually be a useful indicator of not only when to sell, but when to buy as well. Let’s investigate.
What is a short squeeze anyway?
A short squeeze typically unfolds when a stock that’s being shorted by investors unexpectedly rises in price, rather than falls. After borrowing shares from a broker to then sell in the market, a rising price not only creates an instant paper loss but as other shorters scramble to buy back stock to cover their positions (either to stem losses or meet margin calls), the price can rocket.
At this point it hardly matters if the stock remains grossly overvalued or destined to eventually fall for as the squeeze tightens short sellers will feel the heat. Deciding to exit the trade then comes down to individual risk appetites, time horizons and financial clout.
What happens when the shorts get it wrong?
A good example of shorts getting burned occurred last year with supermarket delivery group Ocado. With it’s sole Waitrose contract, Ocado IPO’d in 2010 at a 180p flotation price that some analysts felt was a bit much even then. By March 2013 it was one of the most heavily shorted stocks in the market, with around 15% of its shares out on loan - a huge number. But that same month Ocado bagged a delivery deal with Morrisons that triggered a relentless rerating that saw its price rise by 200% through the year. The massive price hike was magnified by this big unwinding of short positions, leaving just under 4% of Ocado’s stock on their books at the end of the run.
What tools are there to spot when the shorts may be shaken out?
Researchers who have studied the mechanics of short squeezes have suggested that it’s possible for short sellers to spot the warning signs early. Not only that, but a short squeeze indicator can also give long-only investors the chance to trade on the price rallies that can occur during a shorting shakeout. For both sets of investors, a short squeeze can be the first sign that a company has turned a corner, that its fortunes might be changing and that sentiment towards it is warming. While short sellers are famously smart sellers, they do occasionally get it wrong and rising prices can be justified. So what do you look for?
Hedge funds and researchers tends to focus on three key signals for signs of high short squeeze risk:
- The percentage level of Short Interest in a stock.
- High share price volatility
- The Short Interest Ratio (otherwise known as Days to Cover).
As we’ve discussed previously, analysing short interest - or the percentage of shares sold short in relation to the overall number of shares outstanding - can shine a light on the companies that short sellers love to hate. But the level of short interest can also offer an indication of how severe a squeeze could be if the share price started to climb. With larger numbers of traders leaping to cover their positions, stocks with high levels of short interest can be prone to more extreme squeezes.
In addition, heavily shorted stocks with relatively high medium- and long-term price volatility (often found with smaller shares) are also more susceptible to the types of large price movements that can trigger a short squeeze. In these cases, heavily shorted, highly volatile shares that are falling in price frequently see very sharp price run-ups with the potential to panic short sellers out of the trade and trigger a short squeeze.
As well as short interest and price volatility, potential short squeezes can also be identified by using a signal called Days to Cover, which predicts when short sellers are likely to step in to cut their losses. It works by analysing how long it would theoretically take for a company’s shorted shares to be covered if all the sellers decided to unwind their positions at once. That’s worked out by dividing the number of shorted shares outstanding with the stock’s average daily trading volume. If, for example, a company had 10 million shares held short and an average daily trading volume of 2 million, then the Days to Cover would be 5 (5 days for all those shorts to be covered). Analysts use the ratio to measure the sentiment around a stock - the higher the Days to Cover, the more likely that short sellers will act to stem their losses and the more extreme a short squeeze is likely to be.
How can you access short interest data on the web?
Of course, these sorts of data points are generally only available to smart money institutional funds but the great news is that in the coming weeks we’ll be will be introducing Stockopedia’s own Short Interest Rank and Short Squeeze Indicator. These tools will blend the best of the above ratios to help investors get a detailed insight into which stocks are being short sold and when those positions are coming under pressure. With this insight it will be possible to get a much more informed view when opening a short position or, for long-only investors, see the moments when previously shorted stocks could be about to rally.
Not only this, but we’ll be merging our Short Interest Rank, Insider Rank and Institutional Best Ideas Rank into an overarching ‘Smart Money Ranking’ for every stock in Europe, and later the world. If you want to be one of the first to on the list to test out our new Ownership features and piggy back the smart money - please sign up here.
Disclaimer
This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

8 comments
If you look at the PE difference between AIM and FTSE normalized by sector/style weights, I'd expect most of it to disappear (you can check easily by picking a couple of sectors, filtering for comparable quality, and comparing at that level).
Here is some up-to-date recalculations by me of median PERs by index:
AIM 17.015
FLEDGLING 14.33
FTSE100 16.78
FTSE250 16.69
NONE 18.78
SMALLCAP 15.99
So AIM is now looking relatively expensive.
Apologies for the typos. So "it is a questionable strategy [to short] any high PE stock" was the sentence I was looking for. Thanks.
Given the PE ratios of Google, Amazon and Tesla, you could also consider them to be story stocks with even more over-blown PEs than any UK equivalent. I cannot see the wisdom of shorting them myself, because it is difficult to predict the magnitude to which these companies could fundamentally change the way that most of us do things. Think of Cisco, Dell and Microsoft in the 1990s they underwent monster rises in stock price.
My feeling is that AIM is now seeing a lot of institutional money come back into it's stocks. This is due to the fact that institutions are very underweight AIM stocks, and investor demand is likley to rise with govt. changes on ISA rules and stamp duty. Many are decent companies but a large rump are not. Therefore the institutions are buying the best quality companies that have strong brands, growing sales and stable/growing earnings. The fact that ASOS is by far the biggest company explains a lot as to why it keeps motoring upward. Other higher quality larger MktCap AIM50 stocks will also likely benefit as well IMO.
Rick
"My feeling is that AIM is now seeing a lot of institutional money come back into it's stocks."
Well well ;) Back in August http://wp.me/p2eZvw-tk I posted that AIM seemed on a PE of about 9, whilst the FTSE100 and FTSE250 were around 15-16. That's a mighty discount compared to the rest of the market, and makes is look ripe for a re-rating. Plus, if the bull market continues, then they'll likely be an increasing appetite for risk; especially for small companies where good growth opportunities can be identified.
So, yes, I wouldn't be surprised to see that AIM has a cracking 2014. We seem to be thinking alike ;)
Best wishes.
This will be a very interesting feature.
For the brave, and in the same vein as Ocado (LON:OCDO), is Blinkx (LON:BLNX). It has high relative strength (RS6m is 55%), a monster PE of 37, very high short interest, and is on Goldman Sachs conviction buy list. This has probably got another Ocado short squeeze written all of it.
No position, as I don't have the courage of my convictions.
Interesting points Mark,
The thing about Ocado (LON:OCDO), the more that the "clever" hedge fund managers short this stock the more it goes up. Using "value" as a reason to short is not a strong strategy as proved by Julian Robertson (of Tiger Fund fame), who was the second largest money manager in the 1990s and famously blew up his fund in the Dot.com bubble by shorting the overvalued tech stocks of the day.
What you don't know can sometimes kill you in investing. So shorting a strong trend in motion can be a recipe for disaster as ASOS shorts have so far found.
Blinkx is another case in point. Selling online/mobile video advertising is potentially a massive growth industry, which is difficult to value at the moment. So in a bull market it is a questionable strategy any high PE stock who's business you do not understand.
Is this just the investor mentality of the "bottom fisher" in reverse? This is also a statistically proven losing strategy.
Shorting stocks in a down trend with weakening fundamentals and a poor balance sheet would appear to be a far more sensible strategy to me .... am I missing something?
Rick
It's also worth noting that there was a phase when Whitney Tilson was shorting Netflix. It was in a growth pahse with high momentum. He eventually had to close his short with a big loss. The moral is clear: don't short high-momentum story stocks. At least wait until there is a clear sign of weakness in the fundamentals. Even story stocks can have have price slumps - but it's difficult to tell whether that's a permanent breakdown in momentum, or a buying opportunity.
"So in a bull market it is a questionable strategy any high PE stock who's business you do not understand."
I take it you meant "it is a questionable strategy [to short] any high PE stock". Yes. The thing about these story stocks is that because they're unproven businesses, you get to use your imagination about what valuation levels should be. Although these story stocks can be obviously overvalued, I think that there are many momentum investors who already know this, but still see a profitable trading strategy in them.
"Shorting stocks in a down trend with weakening fundamentals and a poor balance sheet would appear to be a far more sensible strategy to me .... am I missing something?"
Nope. That seems spot-on to me. Jim Chanos - whom I consider an investing genius - is a value investor who often shorts companies that other value investors are buying. Whilst value investors are saying "look how cheap it is", he might short them because he discerns them as value traps, where the company is facing structural problems, accounting shenanigans, and so forth.
Great points. What I have learnt over many years is that you just can't call the top in glamour stocks that have great businesses behind them. They can go to the moon. Where's the top for ASOS ? Nobody ever knows. It's this whole truth that Bill O'Neil's CANSLIM system gets its genius from, and where we are trying to build the QM ranking philosophy from. High Quality, High Momentum stocks can perform very well, irrespective of Value - our backtesting has backed this up.
One of the best shorting books I have read is this one by O'Neil himself - http://amzn.to/1dK3RFe - which basically says 'wait till it breaks'. This kinda thing...