Market making needs long term thinking
Last week's letter referred to the need for ongoing step change innovation to maintain the health of an economy and the fact that this activity frequently is best undertaken within small companies aspiring to become much larger companies. Software Radio Technology (LON:SRT) last week exemplified both the underlying wealth creating potential of such companies from the standpoints of shareholders and the overall UK economy, and also the fragility of the UK's capital market processes for supporting such companies. Incidentally, I have previously congratulated SRT on seeking to create a level playing field in terms of communicating with both private and institutional investors. Visit www.softwarerad.com and click on its webcast for a good illustration of how AIM companies can approach investor relations.
On 21st June, final results to March 2011 were announced showing sales of £9.2 million (2010: £3.6 million) and pre-tax profit of £1.9 million (2010: £386,000 loss).
On the morning of 24th June, the share price dropped 26% from 39p to 29p on the back of a sell recommendation from Tom Bulford, editor of Red Hot Penny Shares. He had built up a strong following during the past 18 months, based on an initial recommendation of SRT at 6p and accordingly a desire to take some profit at 38p was not surprising.
The reason that shareholders want their investments to be listed is so that they can easily trade shares at a reasonably predictable price range at a time of their choosing. At the heart of the UK's capital market process lies marketmaking. It is conducted in a way which is counterproductive to long term investing because of the inherent volatility of an activity undertaken with too little capital, too few people and inadequate knowledge about the underlying business of the stocks being traded. This is illustrated by the following:
- I know of one marketmaker where one employee is allocated £1 million of capital to service 100 smallcaps.
- the CEO of one very nice AIM listed engineering company, with sales at the time of our conversation of c.£40 million and operating profit of £3 million, saw the share price drop 20% on the back of a sale of 2,000 shares. The CEO offered to meet the various marketmakers to explain the business and was turned down by all of them!
The purpose of investment is to make a return on one's capital. Ultimately this can only be driven by companies which themselves create wealth for the economy as a whole, for example net exporters. Building such companies requires a long term mindset during the period from start-up through to becoming properly established businesses and yet right at the heart of the UK's capital market process lies marketmaking, which is generally run with a short term mindset. However, the good news is that nature abhors a vacuum and I think that there are at least two solutions beginning to emerge, namely:
AIM listed XCAP Securities (LON:XCAP) - an interview with one of the founders can be seen on Stockopedia by clicking here. XCAP's strategy appeals to me as a long term investor because properly capitalised marketmaking is its core activity, on to which it has bolted the co mplementary activities of i) investment services with a focus on private investors and ii) corporate finance.
AIM listed Share (LON:SHRE) , which has developed its own trading platform, Sharemark. This platform seems to me to have the potential for offering the following benefits to capital market participants, including private investors:
- Shares get traded on it at a single price, ie, investors can choose to trade with no spread.
- Companies can select the periodicity of auctions (eg weekly, monthly, quarterly) appropriate to the needs of their investors and thus provide time for supply and demand to build.
- It will provide greater visibility of supply and demand to marketmakers,
- It enables private investors to participate directly in the share price formation process and hence focus a lot more capital and eyes on a single smallcap, with the great advantage that the private investors are acting as principals and not as agents - this potential introduction of long term capital to marketmaking is, I believe, a vital part of the solution to the problem described above - re the problem, Oscar Wilde's definition of a cynic as 'a man who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing' springs to mind!
- Companies' shares can be dual traded eg AIM listed Brainjuicer (LON:BJU) and Share are tradable on both Sharemark and AIM.
Imagine a world where Tom Bulford could recommend to his followers that they patiently consider taking a profit on a particular stock using the Sharemark facility rather than all needing to head for an exit before the next man via the existing marketmaking process!
Disclaimer
This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

3 comments
Well, you'll be pleased to hear that with the power of ShareSoc's membership and Board behind me, and accompanied by Murakami of Stockopedia, who has been very supportive and most helpful, we've actually taken some action on the issue of wide spreads leading to poor liquidity, and met with the LSE on Wednesday. I have to say that the meeting was surprisingly fruitful and a further meeting is likely in a few weeks time. The LSE itself is starting to appreciate the problem and is making plans for improvement. Can't say more at this stage, but certain beneficial moves may occur before the end of this year. We're on the case.
[plug]If you haven't joined ShareSoc yet, please do so! Though we've already passed the 1,000 member mark, the more people joins us and back us, the more effective our campaigns can be. Associate membership is free (but donations are always welcome!).[/plug]
Mark
The way I see the position is that if an institutional investor wishes to sell a sizable line of shares, there is enough commission involved for brokers to quietly place the stock and the vendor will want the placing done with the minimum of price disruption. Where a small sale is involved, it is uneconomic for human intervention to find a purchaser - this leads to the need for an automated process to match buyers and sellers of smaller shareholdings, which is what I believe Sharemark is capable of doing, particularly as it is owned by a stockbroker in contrast to previous matched bargain trading platforms which have suffered from not having ready access to a sizable number of private investors
I am not really sure i follow - if the Herd following a tipster all rush to sell when he says so, surely, in an illiquid stock, the sp will take a pounding whatever the trading system? A short term surplus of sellers should always cause the price to go down. i don't really see that market makers can be blamed for the illiquidity (save for putting off people from trading by ludicrously wide spreads. That is a big problem which could be solved by regulation saying, for example, that any mm could never have a spread of more than, say 5%).