18
Archived articleThis is an archived article from 2011 - please note that any content within the article may be out of date.

Naked Trading: A Robbie Burns Inspired Quant Investing Screen

In Brief

This is a mixed-criteria GARP screen inspired by the enjoyable best-seller by Robbie Burns, "The Naked Trader: How Anyone Can Make Money Trading Shares". His approach combines a focus on fundamentals:

"My investment strategy has always been quite simple: find excellent companies and hold them until the value comes out".

While he does appear to use a fair amount of technical analysis in order to time the entry, he appears sceptical about pure TA:

"I strongly believe charts are very important to look at.. but I also believe it’s simply crazy to buy and sell shares on the basis of looking at a chart and nothing else at all".

 In the book, Robbie seems to ally himself most closely to the investor type that he calls the Medium Term Trader, i.e. an investor that buys and holds shares for:

"anything between 3 months and 2 years, does some careful research, sticks to stop losses, takes profits when it’s sensible to do so... & prefers smaller companies (with growth prospects) to FTSE 100 ones".

Background 

Robbie Burns is a journalist and writer. Formerly working with BSkyB, ITV, Channel 4, he left full-time work in 2001 to trade and run his own businesses. While at BSkyB, Robbie broadcast a diary of his share trades which became his website, www.nakedtrader.co.uk. He published the first edition of the Naked Trader in 2005, following up with the third edition in September 2011. As Alistair Blair of the Investors Chronicle notes, "The Naked Trader by Robbie Burns sounds awfully like one of those 'How anyone can make money trading shares' books that wouldn't get a mention in this column. It really does say exactly that on the cover. But hey - to ignore the fact that this promise sells books would be very naive. It's what's inside that counts".

The book does cover a lot of very useful material, including an excellent chapter discussing the top 20 mistakes that investors make, backed with real-life examples (these range from not using stop losses, to buying lots of penny shares and/or tipped shares). He also lists in the book 20 "proven" investing  techniques which range from fairly trivial examples like "Find something cheap", to the more interesting ideas such as buying shares that have recently done a share split (he gives the example of Greggs for this) or which are moving from AIM to Main Market ("whenever you see an announcement that an AIM share is planning to move to the main market, it’s... probably one of the best buy signals there is!"). The Naked Trader is unfortunately devoid of any systematic backtesting type analysis so the only evidence for some of these ideas is frankly Robbie's say-so but that's not to say that they aren't sensible ideas.

While the Naked Trader book lacks the kind of analytical rigour of, say, David Dreman's "Contrarian Investment Strategies", that's also part of its appeal. It's written much more as a candid expose of the lessons learnt from practical trading, without any pretensions to be an academic work. As one Amazon reviewer puts it, it's "free from the usual financial mumbo-jumbo jargon found in most stuffy financial books". Given the unashamedly populist/laddish tone, it's also a book that might be read by a larger audience than most investing texts - hopefully, that will go some way to correcting the awful national obsession with speculating on residential property, that most unproductive asset class beloved by seemingly all Brits!

Does "Naked Investing" work?

Between 2002 and 2005, Robbie Burns wrote a column for the Sunday Times, 'My DIY Pension', featuring share buys and sells made in his pension, and apparently doubled the money from £40,000 to £80,000 over this period. By mid-2011 he had turned this into £250,000. Robbie is said to have made a tax-free gain of well over £1,000,000 from trading shares since 1999, making a profit every year, even during market downturns. His public trades - detailed on his website - have made to date £978,286 (split between Share Buys: £815,731, Spread Shorts: £155,594 & Big Brother Bets: £6,961). Without knowing for certain the initial investment amount, it's hard to know the exact compound annual return he's achieved but turning, say, 50,000 into 1 million over 12 years amounts to a CAGR of 27.8% which isn't too shabby. It is worth pointing out that this is a portfolio return, which may or may not be matched by a simplified quantitative "Naked Trader screen", especially given that there a number of qualitative criteria involved in his system that can't really be modelled (as discussed below).

Investing Criteria

Burns declares himself against strict rules - "I'm not really one for rules. I've always hated authority, so rules and me don't often get along". While he does list some 30 rules of thumb in an appendix, they are mostly qualitative ones, such as "Understand as fully as you can everything about a company before you buy it". Having said that, on page 130 of the 3rd edition, he lists a number of stock selection criteria, with the most quantitative being:

a) Dividends, profits and turnover are rising

b) It has a full listing - "I tend to favour shares that have a market cap of between £50m and £900m because they have a lot more room for growth than, say, a FTSE 100 share".

c) It is liquid - "A spread of 3% is about as much as I’ll allow. 4% max".

d) It is priced at under 15x profits to market cap. He also says it must look cheap, using slightly wider PE based criteria - "Personally, I quite like lower P/E ratios (provided all the other signs on a share are good)... in the region of 12–20". For simplicity, we specify that PE must be less than 20x but sort in PE order ascending. 

f) The chart looks positive and is in an upward trend - the measure here seems to be 1 year absolute strength (although he also talks about the three year profile too). He is keen on shares trending upwards and breaking new highs. "Don’t buy shares trending downwards and breaking new lows".

g) Debt is under three times its full-year profits: "My rule of thumb is not to buy anything with net debt more than three times the full-year pre tax profit, or what the likely pre-tax profit might be next year".

Let us know in the comments below if you think we've missed anything from a quant perspective. 

Qualitative criteria

In addition, he lists a range of other more qualitative criteria, which can't be filtered quantitatively and could only be assessed based on a detailed analysis of the company, e.g. "there are no question marks, I understand what the company does, demand for its products is likely to grow". One other criterion - there is still growth to come - could potentially be quantified by referring to analyst forecasts, although given the poor forecasting record by analysts, company growth prospects are probably better assessed on a case by case basis. He also does a quick and dirty textual analysis of the annual report to see how frequently it uses words like "challenging" or "difficult" as opposed to "exceeding expectations" or "positive" .

How can I apply these screen criteria?

Although Robbie's approach isn't ideally suited to quantitative screening, we've done our best to replicate the key filtering criteria in order to create a Naked Trader-eque Screen. We'll be tracking its performance shortly on Stockopedia Premium. It's worth recognising that Burns seems sceptical about the value-added of systematic investing - "If only stock market investing was that easy! Don’t waste time on magic formulas and systems... You’re better off doing your own research and developing your own investing style". It will be interesting to see how this simplified Naked Trader-eseque quant screen compares over time with his own declared returns on the website.

From the Source:

The third edition of Robbie Burns' Naked Trader is now available on Amazon. It is a quick read, packed full of ideas (some quite introductory, others far less so) and - once you get past the tone which sometimes grates - it is very very entertaining and educational.

Further Reading

Disclaimer

This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

11 comments


Avatar for Howard Gilbert

I recently re-read Ed 3 but I see that Robbie just brought out Edition 5, if anyone wants to read the latest edition. If you are new to the stock markets he does give a lot of good advice and warnings to help the reader avoid losing their investments through reckless behaviour and lack of planning and preparation.

2
Avatar for mmarkkj777

Personally, I believe tips should be treated with a large pinch of salt, unless they are accompanied with a sensible rationale. Even then we should use this a starting point to do further investigation.

2
Avatar for William K

Yes, of course it's impossible to avoid tips! And some tipped shares do indeed do very well. Statistically that is inevitable. I think the key point Robbie Burns made was to avoid buying shares just after they'd been tipped in the Sunday papers because the dealers would mark up the price on Monday. The underlying message from Burns appears to be that a tip should be seen as an indication to do one's own research and not a blind recommendation to buy. Incidentally the tips in Investor Chronicle need to be examined in great depth - by their own admission most of their tips underperform the market. (Having said that, their sell tips are usually pretty accurate.)

3
Avatar for Rusty2

I thought that maybe the case, I noticed IC tips were marked up before the market opened. I agree their tips have not performed very well. I found their sell tips to be too late usually. I have not subscribed to IC for a few years. If I did follow their tips I would certainly use a stop loss.

1
Avatar for William K

Good article. Thanks., And a fair summary of the 2014 edition of Naked Trader (3rd edition). It was the first book I read on investing - trading - speculating. (The second book was Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham - I probably should have read that first). I enjoyed the Robbie Burns. book because of its simplicity and freedom from jargon. (The jokey style wore a bit thin after a while although that might be down to my lack of a sense of humour...)
Now - three years after reading the book - I still use what I think are Robbie Burns' most applicable rules:
1. Always use a stop loss
2. Avoid firms with total debt greater than profit x 3.
3. Avoid penny shares and tipped shares
4. Avoid spreads greater than 3%
5. Buy on the uptrend - never on a downtrend
6. Don't blindly follow technical analysis
These are pretty good rules for a beginner because they're easy to understand and follow.

2
Avatar for Rusty2

But many shares get tipped so how can you avoid them? Also some tipped shares do very well, 2 I can think of are Ab Dynamics (LON:ABDP) and Burford Capital (LON:BUR) have done well over the years, ABDP spread can be quite high. Bioventix (LON:BVXP) has a wide spread also, one I have held for some years but yes generally I avoid wide spreads. I thought Burns did some bottom fishing? I think he changed his rules in later books.

0
Avatar for Mattrose1

Add to the criteria - Exchange Market Size to be greater than £5000.

0
Avatar for Valley Exile

It worries me that a site which trades on the value of the information it provides, can't put the effort in to ensure that this Guru screen is not complete, or up-to-date. The Fourth Edition of this book is markedly different in approach (i.e. terms of its approach to AIM shares) and was published in 2014. It makes me wonder how current all the other Guru screens are, especially where the authors are still alive and updating there work.

1
Avatar for Tom Firth

Hi,

Please check out our FAQ on this particular point here:

http://help.stockopedia.com/knowledgebase/articles/831816-why-are-some-of-the-rules-on-your-guru-screens-out

In short, we are not looking to replicate the very latest version of a Guru strategy, nor are we trying to track the actual trading performance of a given Guru. We are simply trying to track the results of a given set of rules at a given point in time for experimental & educational purposes only (i.e. in order to illustrate different approaches). As such, it is important we don't update the rules after the screen setup so as to not invalidate the results we've seen to date (hindsight bias).  However, should you wish to tweak the rules and try the strategies out for yourself, it is very easy to create a duplicate of the screen using the grey 'Duplicate' button at the top of the screen.


Please do let us know via the Green Feedback Button if you have any questions on this.

Tom

7
Avatar for Murakami

Thanks, it's an interesting book - I really enjoyed it. It's quite anecdotal and he doesn't present muchevidence for many of his statements, but there's a fair amount of truth/ hard-earned experience in there plus some great war stories. Given the qualitative elements, the screen is an imperfect prism, that's for sure, but hopefully helpful to some investors as a starting point and as you can see, it's outperforming the market materially, up almost 20% (vs. 7% for the FTSE) based on the model portfolio since we started tracking it in December. 

FWIW, I think our quarterly-rebalanced performance testing is a bit more systematic than his anecdotal "scores out of 10" but we definitely have a quantitative bias in our thinking. Unashamedly so, given the academic evidence in suppport of this! :-)

Incidentally, we're up for modelling anything (research papers, popular books) with the data-set if people find it helpful - someone suggested "Phil Town's Rule One" so we're having a look at adding that at the moment. Let us know via Help -> Feature Suggestions if you think we're missing an interesting approach.

2
Avatar for SparksTrader

I applaud Stockopedia for taking on NT's trading strategy despite admitting qualitative shortfalls.
NT's book in itself is refreshing and free from the usual mumbo-jumbo and he makes an interesting comment regarding ratios in general on page 33. in his initial book, when describing different types of investors:
"Mr Accountant
Loves poring over every detail of a company’s accounts and takes great joy in
PEG ratios and acid tests and all that. Thing is, he’s misses the point of the
market which largely ignores all that. If you look at all the ratios and the
small things, you’d never buy a single share. Missed loads of good
opportunities.
Chances of success: 4/10"

1
Get the free newsletter