Potential Korean Conflict
I've turned "chicken" on South Korea today, in the light of recent developments and dumped my holding of Ishares Msci Korea (LON:IKOR) at a small profit.
I am particularly concerned about what might transpire this weekend, with the George Washington steaming into the Yellow Sea and the US about to embark on exercises with South Korea.
Whilst this article downplays the threat from the North, I find China's involvement and stance extremely troubling:
...Jia Qingguo, vice-dean of Peking University's School of International Studies, says China believes it needs a viable North Korea for as long as America sells weapons to Taiwan. ''If the US is a threat then North Korea has dual importance because if there is a military conflict then North Korea can be strategically very valuable because South Korea is an ally of the US,'' says Professor Jia. ''This is the logic … China-North Korea relations happen within this bigger contest.''
China has avoided apportioning any blame for this week's North Korean artillery bombardment that killed two marines and two civilians and wounded more than a dozen others, in what is said to be the first attack on South Korean civilians since the 1950-53 Korean War.
China's latest moves to draw closer to its wayward neighbour include reglorifying their joint exploits during the devastating Korean War, which many Chinese historians agree began with the North invading the South. It was ''a just war to defend peace against aggression from the United States'', said Vice-President Xi Jinping, who is expected to begin succeeding President Hu Jintao in 2012.
One of the legacies of that war is that North Korea and China never accepted the US-imposed ''northern limit line'', which closely hugs the North Korean coast in the Yellow Sea. The North claims a ''military demarcation line'' that more evenly divides the seas between two countries and which is much further to the south. It is instructive that the torpedoing of the Cheonan warship in March and this week's shelling of a South Korean island both occurred in territory claimed by both sides.
There is internal logic for the military's supreme command of North Korea claiming that this week's deadly bombardment was ''retaliation'' against South Korean military exercises in those disputed waters. It said those exercises were military provocation and ''a sinister attempt to defend the brigandish 'northern limit line' ''...
Whilst North Korea's shelling is unforgiveable, IMO, I don't see how these joint exercises with South Korea will improve matters and strike me as extremely dangerous. Bringing in the George Washington is understandable, as a show of support and to indicate that the shelling cannot be without consequences, but it seems to me that conducting exercises could really put the situation on a hair-trigger. I hope that US strategists know what they're doing and are simultaneously pursuing every diplomatic channel with China to try to avoid conflict. If not, this could have implications far wider that just between the Koreas.
In such times, I am very happy to retain my gold and oil related investment, as well as to husband the cash released by my Ishares Msci Korea (LON:IKOR) sale.
Mark
Disclaimer
This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

4 comments
Hi Mark,
Much as I disapprove of Wikileaks, it's a little disappointing (as a voyeur) that Wiki desn't seem to have anything interesting to say about the Koreas.......if I were a cynic (moi ?), I might wonder why there's so much attention on the possibility of a strike agst Iran- and a deafening silence about THIS area !
.....are we / they being 'softened up' for something ?
We still seem to be on a hair trigger: http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/11/29/koreas.crisis/?hpt=T2
Surpised at the lack of comment on this thread. If this does "kick off", the repercussions could be huge.
Interesting & positive, IMO, to see China urging negotiations:
Let's hope that this is settled peacefully but that's difficult without understanding what's really going on amongst the DPRK leadership and internal battles for supremacy.
Mark
Hi Mark,
I agree with the comment above. It could be very material indeed.
I commented elsewhere about the Chinese apparently viewing the situation as an "emergency"...and it is very difficult to read how things might develop. This is a new position for the Chinese, and perhaps flags the fact that risks are indeed rising?
With all these things, it is a good idea to remember the old saying - that truth is the first casualty of war! Accordingly I don't buy the line that the provocations have been one-sided. Indeed the South Koreans and the US have held frequent war games in the region.
What I do know though is that the South Korean stock markets have a lot further to fall in the event of war than the North Korean one..... ;-).....so I'm not surprised to see you reach your conclusions.
rgds
ee
Hi ee,
For general interest, I have also trimmed some other positions and am reasonably well cashed up, so able to take advantage of opportunities that may arise.
With instability of the Euro too, seems like a good time to "wait & see" to me, from the investment POV. ISTM that that story's also got a lot further to run before it's settled.
Cheers,
Mark