229
Archived articleThis is an archived article from 2023 - please note that any content within the article may be out of date.

Small Cap Value Report (Mon 16 Jan 2023) - KLR, AMS, RWA, SHI, MRK, GHT, SUP, STCM, TPT, QTX, BDEV, JSG, CREO, IQE, QXT, AT., MPAC

Good morning from Graham & Paul. Today's mammoth report is now complete!

To start you off today, I spent some time over the weekend catching up on 11 company announcements we missed in last week's SCVRs. These are all short sections below.

Podcast transcript - here's the written version of this weekend's podcast. The audio version is here, and on podcast platforms. No mystery shares this week, but dozens of shares discussed, and lots of macro news/views too.

Graham's 2023 watch list

We thought that it would be a nice idea for Graham to write up his watchlist ideas for 2023 small caps, like I did the weekend before last. So he's been working on this today, and Graham's article is now published here.


Explanatory notes -

A quick reminder that we don’t recommend any stocks. We aim to review trading updates & results of the day and offer our opinions on them as possible candidates for further research if they interest you. Our opinions will sometimes turn out to be right, and sometimes wrong, because it's anybody's guess what direction market sentiment will take & nobody can predict the future with certainty. We are analysing the company fundamentals, not trying to predict market sentiment.

We stick to companies that have issued news on the day, with market caps up to about £700m. We avoid the smallest, and most speculative companies, and also avoid a few specialist sectors (e.g. natural resources, pharma/biotech).

A key assumption is that readers DYOR (do your own research), and make your own investment decisions. Reader comments are welcomed - please be civil, rational, and include the company name/ticker, otherwise people won't necessarily know what company you are referring to.



Paul's Section:

Today's news 

Iqe (LON:IQE) (49p [down 18% at 09:47] - mkt cap £395m) - it’s down a lot today, but in reality this has only reversed a spike up that happened in the last 10 days, in this somewhat frenzied market - reinforcing the point I made in my weekend podcast, that big rises at the moment look indiscriminate, and don’t necessarily mean a company is trading well. So it’s dangerous buying into price rises right now, unless you’ve got the safety of a positive recent trading update. I’m thinking that unusual spikes up might be good opportunities to top slice some profits, and thereby have a war chest for buying any unreasonable dips. But each to their own, and market timing is very difficult to get consistently right - some people have a flair for it, but most of us don’t.

Trading update for FY 12/2022 today. Revenue c.£166m, short of £173m forecast shown on StockReport. Hit by “small number of doubtful debts”, and one contract seeing slippage into Q1 of 2023. Reported 8% revenue gain all comes from favourable forex, growth is flat at constant currency.

Vague about profitability, saying it’s “largely resilient to the challenging macro environment”.

Outlook for 2023 - expects some destocking by customers in H1. Confident in strategy to diversify & longer term growth targets. Excited by pipeline.

My opinion - I’m not keen on this update. It’s all rather vague, dodges telling us what profitability has been, and the outlook sounds soft for 2023. The valuation looks inflated to me, for a capital-intensive business that doesn’t seem to make any meaningful profits any more. Bulls need to be sure that a big increase in profits is in the pipeline, otherwise why on earth are you valuing this company at almost £400m? Very poor free cashflow historically too - with capex exceeding operating cashflow most years.

Quixant (LON:QXT) (172p [up 3% at 09:34] - mkt cap £114m) - FY 12/2022 trading update. Strong demand, positive trading in Q4. Revenues $120m (up 38% vs LY) - a new record, and ahead of expectations of $115m. Adj PBT - forecast is $10.1m expecting to beat this slightly. Supply chain issues continuing, but partial recovery in gross margins as component prices stabilised. Net cash of $12.9m, up slightly over last 6 months. Inventories being reduced. Outlook - strong order book, good visibility, should see further revenue growth in 2023. Macro headwinds, but resilient end markets and “strategic positioning”.

My opinion - a confident-sounding update, and note that broker forecasts have been rising in stages for the last 6 months. Valuation looks about right, at 15x forecast earnings, with a modest 1.4% dividend (scope to increase that, I think). Could be upside on the shares, if it’s able to return to pre-covid peak EPS of about 20p (note that it reports in US dollars, so you need to convert into sterling, to avoid overpaying accidentally!). No dilution during the pandemic, with share count stable at 66-67m shares for years. Overall, I’ll give this a thumbs up, although it doesn’t madly excite me.

Ashtead Technology Holdings (LON:AT.) (330p [down 1% at 11:14] - mkt cap £264m) - I don’t know anything about this share, but Roland covered it here in Sept 2022. It sounds interesting, and is a rare case of a 2021 float that’s actually done well! Broker consensus forecasts have been steadily rising over the last year. Services to global offshore energy sector looks a nice place to be, with the proliferation of wind farms an ongoing theme.

Trading update today says - strong trading continued in Q4 of FY 12/2022. FY revenues up 30% on LY, to £72.5m. Slight benefit from acquisitions, but organic growth was the bulk at +28% (6% of which is from favourable forex). Strong pricing & utilisation have enhanced gross margins. Profit guidance: EBITDA “modestly ahead” of market consensus (they forgot to include a footnote specifying the figure), and EBITA (ie adj operating profit) “comfortably ahead” of mkt exps. Sounds good, in the context of mkt exps that have been rising, so to beat a raised number is a lot more impressive than meeting/beating a lowered forecast number, as with plenty of other companies right now.

Outlook - nothing specific, just “continued progress” expected, and a positive tone. No cautionary words.

My opinion - a new share for me, so I’ve only done the quickest desktop review, but I like what I see. Forecast for FY 12/2022 shows a big rise in profits, and a strong operating margin - suggesting in-demand niche services, with pricing power. Forward PER of 15 seems reasonable, and cheap if this rate of growth can be sustained. The last balance sheet was OK, but isn’t strong, at just £18m NTAV, with some debt. So I hope the company prioritises debt reduction/elimination rather than divis.

Overall, thumbs up from me - looks worthy of further research.

MPAC (LON:MPAC) (270p [up 5% at 11:17] - mkt cap £55m) - FY 12/2022 trading update, is in line with market expectations (but no footnote), with an “encouraging outlook” for 2023. Says H2 improved on H1 (good, as H1 was weak), with supply chain issues & costs sounding well managed in H2, giving improved margins & profits in H2. Order intake rose “significantly” in H2, although Dec 2022 order book of £69m is down on £78m a year earlier. Increasing pipeline it says (no numbers). Higher year end net debt (no figure provided) due to working capital increases, expecting to “largely unwind” in H1 2023.

My opinion - no strong view either way. The profit warning mid-year was a big one, with profit forecasts slashed, and the growth story unravelling. As supply chains normalise, and maybe some pent-up demand might come through, I could see this share doing OK in future, but that depends on lots of unknown factors, so it’s just educated guesswork really, as with most shares! No divis here I see for a long time. Strange balance sheet, showing a large pension surplus, that needs careful scrutiny. This share looks primed to rise, if it’s able to report good trading updates in 2023, and it looks well set up for that - because last year’s soft H1 is this year’s easy comparative to beat.


Backlog items from last week

Keller (LON:KLR) (750p - £546m mkt cap) - I’ve only looked at this large contracting business once before, here in June 2022, and was quite impressed with its value characteristics (low PER, good divis, and sound balance sheet).

FY 12/2022 update last week disclosed that it has discovered fraud at its Australian unit, Austral. The profit impact on its H1 results is said to be c.£6m (it reported total profit of £50m for H1). So significant, but not massive. Trading in the rest of the group has been strong, and FY 12/2022 adj operating profit guidance is now slightly below £109m, little changed from previous consensus of £111m.

Expectations for 2023 are unchanged. Year end net debt as expected at 1.3x EBITDA (no figure provided). Final divi raised 5%, total for the year now 37.7p, a nice yield of 5.0%.

Outlook comments sound upbeat, with talk of a substantial order book, and confidence in prospects.

My opinion - news of this internal fraud has knocked about 10% off the share price, which looks about right given the likely impact on results. Liberum’s revised forecasts are little changed, and the share looks to be priced attractively on a low PER of 7.5, and a 5% yield. It seems cash hungry, with net debt rising a lot, seemingly being sucked into working capital. Needs more work on balance sheet & cashflow analysis, but looks superficially cheap on a PER/yield basis.

Advanced Medical Solutions (LON:AMS) (254p - mkt cap £551m) - FY 12/2022 trading update last week. Both revenues & profits are In line with market expectations. Confident of meeting 2023 market expectations. Talks about “particularly significant” progress with regulatory approvals, new products, and hopes to expand in the USA.

My opinion - shares look fully valued as things stand, with a forward PER of 24x, which seems a lot given that EPS hasn’t gone anywhere for the last 5 years. It’s a high margin, quality business, sitting on a decent cash pile on its strong balance sheet. The key area would be to assess growth potential for new & existing products. Could be worth doing more investigation.

Robert Walters (LON:RWA) (500p - mkt cap £374m) - FY 12/2022 update last week says conditions became more difficult in Q4, but still showing growth over LY, and profits expected to hit a new record - but “slightly below current market expectations”. Net cash very healthy, at £96.4m.

My opinion - together with SThree (LON:STEM) this is one of my favourite staffing groups. It’s modestly rated on a fwd PER of 9.5, lovely divi yield of 4.9%, and a bulletproof balance sheet.

On the downside earnings forecasts are now starting to drop, so it’s probably seen peak earnings for now. So 2023 could be a bumpy ride, but I don’t see much risk to the divis, which are 2.4x covered. Fine for long-term holders I think, but more nervous short-term traders might be a bit nervous about the outlook as economies slow. So, as with lots of things, how you view it depends on your investing timeframe. It’s a quality business though, and reasonably priced, so I like it still.

SIG (LON:SHI) (35p - mkt cap £414m) - large & complicated. Turnaround plan seems to be working, with an in line update for FY 12/2022. Guidance: revenues £2.74bn, underlying operating profit c.£80m (almost double 2021). Took a £5m hit from insolvency of one of its largest customers, Avonside. Net bank debt is £159m (up by £30m in the year). Leverage is 1.8x on pre-IFRS 16 basis, which doesn’t look worrying (debt did previously worry me). The bank debt is almost entirely a E300m 2026 bond, costing 5.25%. Covenants would need checking.

My opinion - looking at the historic performance, this doesn’t look a very good business at all. Performance now seems to be improving, with broker forecasts improving in the last year. So maybe the turnaround could generate decent results? Might be worth doing more research work to understand what’s happening here. £2.7bn revenues is a lot, so each 1% gross margin improvement is £27m extra on the bottom line. It generated nice free cashflow, pre-pandemic.

Marks Electrical (LON:MRK) (98p - mkt cap £103m) - this share has risen 75% from the low in Oct 2022. Update last week was for the 9 months to Dec 2022. Impressive revenue growth of +22% vs LY. “On track to achieve its full year targets”. It all sounds bullish, but is light on details. Broker profit forecasts have been in a gentle downtrend trend, quietly lowered by c.16% to 4.6p over the last year - managing expectations downwards very skilfully!

My opinion - I admire the entrepreneurial, penny-pinching style of management here - essential in such a low margin, competitive sector. Nearly 19x forward earnings is too high for me. So I suspect the current bull run might have got a bit ahead of itself. There again, larger competitor AO World ran to a ludicrous over-valuation, and remained over-priced for years, before coming back down to earth with a bump. As the new kid on the block, with a better, more efficient business model than AO, maybe MRK could also get into a bull run where people don’t worry much about the valuation? The fact that it’s generating decent sales growth, in a time of challenged consumer disposable income, is impressive. So I can see some merit in this share. Let’s see how things pan out longer term. Maybe tempting to bank some profits after such a good recent run, so there’s ammunition to buy on any dips?

Gresham Technologies (LON:GHT) (180p - mkt cap £150m) - this software company is looking interesting. Strong Q4 performance. Figures slightly ahead of previously upgraded guidance.

New FY 12/2022 guidance: revenue up 31% to £48.6m (includes an acquisition, organic growth is still good, at 16% up). Cash EBITDA (a good figure, as it deducts capitalised development spend) of £4.3m (up 76% vs LY). Good recurring revenues (annualised £28.0m at year end). Cash of £6.3m, and no debt. Figures have benefitted from forex gains (not clear how much). Great visibility - over £42m of FY 12/2023 revenues already under contract. Confident outlook.

My opinion - I think this looks like a breakthrough year in 2022, with Gresham finally delivering a decent level of profitability, after years or erratic performance and limited profitability even in good years. Recurring revenue contracts with some large banks, could be very good business. Intriguing, and worth further investigation, if you understand software companies.

Supreme (LON:SUP) (115p - mkt cap £134m) - trading update last week says its “in line with current market expectations” for FY 3/2023. Strong Q3 (Oct-Dec), with revenue & gross profit up 30% vs Q3 LY. Vaping products are selling well. Lighting division recovering. Batteries division “consistent performance”. Confident outlook for FY 3/2024.

My opinion - looks interesting, on a forward PER of 10.3. This update glosses over the reality that forecasts are now much lower than they were a year ago! As a reminder, it issued a profit warning which I reported on here in July 2022, when orders for the lighting division suddenly dried up. There’s also the ethical consideration of supplying vaping products, which get people addicted to nicotine. On the numbers alone though, it’s looking decent value, and I like the history & approach of entrepreneurial management (57% shareholder). Could be a recovery stock for 2023 maybe, providing no more banana skins are hit.

Steppe Cement (LON:STCM) (44p - mkt cap £96m) - what a bizarre company, selling cement in Kazakhstan. I’ve never looked at it before, because I normally avoid AIM-listed companies that operate abroad, as so many have turned out to be dodgy in the past. However, I will consider overseas companies on AIM if they’ve been listed for a long time, and pay divis. STCM passes those two tests, having been listed here since 2005, and having paid patchy divis since 2014 - the eye-opening one is a whacking great 5.0p interim divi paid very recently (2 Dec 2022). The full year forecast divis are 7.0p, a yield of almost 15%. If that’s sustainable, then it would surely drag the share price higher in future? The history shows a share price that has oscillated sideways for the last 10 years, so what has changed to make things better, and cause a big dividend to have just been paid? See 2 big Director buys on 12 Oct 2022. The last balance sheet looks solid.

My opinion - only for adventurous investors, but the numbers do look intriguing.

Topps Tiles (LON:TPT) (50p - mkt cap £98m) - trading update for Q1 (Oct-Dec 2022) from last week. Everything is in line with expectations (profit, balance sheet, and cashflow, but no figures provided).

LFL sales were up 5.1% (total sales up 10.2% thanks to an acquisition). Expecting more of an H2 weighting to profits this year than usual - reasons given are higher gas expense in H2 expected, timing of accruals (???), and benefit of supply chain costs easing in H2.

Gaining market share.

My opinion - looks reasonably priced, at 12x expected EPS of c.4.2p. I’m intrigued by the expectation of improved profitability in H2, which could have nice read across for other companies.

Quartix Technologies (LON:QTX) (275p - mkt cap £133m) - trading update for FY 12/2022 issued last week - in line with expectations for 9.7p adj EPS (PER of 28x). However, forecasts for FY 12/2023 are guided down to 9.0p (previously 11.1p). Prices are falling (4.7%) not rising, and customer churn is another headwind at 12.8% (increased). So my concern is that Quartix has to generate a lot of new business, just to stand still. This is maybe why EPS has actually fallen over the last 7 years. Which, as I always point out, does raise a big question mark over why the shares are on a growth company rating of 31x 2023 forecast earnings? Balance sheet - negligible asset backing, with NTAV of £2.6m at June 2022 - it has minimal fixed assets, so doesn’t need asset backing, and pays out profit/cashflows in divis historically - a nice business model, I’m not criticising it, just reporting the facts.

France doing well, expanding. Other European countries (aside from main UK market) very small, but growing strongly. USA is a concern, with hardly any growth, and operational problems, and a review of the US expansion plan.

Accounting policy change will boost profit by c.£0.4m.

My opinion - I like the company and management, but just cannot see how the valuation makes any sense, given where things are. Shares still look far too expensive, especially after a profit downgrade for 2023. There needs to be some seriously positive newsflow, to justify the existing price, let alone take it any higher.

Barratt Developments (LON:BDEV) (455p - mkt cap £4.53bn) - trading update for H1 (6m to Dec 2022). “Strong operating performance” in H1 due to big opening order book. But “marked slowdown”, due to known factors (economic & political turmoil, higher mortgage rates, reduced consumer confidence). “Strong net cash position” of £965m, so no danger to the business from a downturn, in my view. Some stats -

Net reservation rate has fallen heavily in the last 12 weeks, to 0.3 (from 0.69 LY).

Forward order book at 31 Dec 2022: £2.54bn (LY: £3.79bn). In terms of number of houses, this is 10,511 now, vs 14,818 LY - a huge drop.

Full year completions could be between 16,000 to 17,475 houses, depending on whether or not usual spring seasonal uplift occurs.

These factors will “undoubtedly impact trading in the second half”.

Construction activity is being slowed down, to reflect slowing orders.

Average selling price up 14.6% in H1 vs H1 LY, to £330k.

Retrenching on land acquisitions, with 3,293 plots no longer proceeding. Strict financial hurdles on new sites. Running down land bank now (not replacing all the land used) in FY 6/2023.

My opinion - it’s quite stark to see how much the forward order book has shrunk, so obviously there’s going to be a big drop in future profits (after a time lag). Therefore we’ve definitely seen peak earnings for a while. The big question is, how much will house prices actually fall by? Nobody really knows, we’ll just have to see what happens. Mortgage rates are coming down, I’ve just checked the latest deals, and with a 20% deposit you can get a 3-year discounted rate of 3.29% with Loughborough B Soc. Or a 4.53% 5-year fixed rate, with Yorkshire B. Soc. These are well down on the recent spike up in mortgage rates. I spoke to an estate agent last week, who told me that buyers are holding off, and waiting until Feb/Mar, to see where mortgage rates settle. So it seems to me that this could just be a temporary phenomenon, but we don’t know for sure either way. Other opinions are equally valid, because we’re all guessing.

Profit forecasts for housebuilders have dropped a lot already, as have share prices. They’re underpinned by bulletproof balance sheets too, with net cash. Barratt has already bounced +40% from its recent low of 325p, and is now 455p. But it’s now trading at par with NTAV, so is hardly over-priced. It all depends what the future holds. I’m inclined to sit tight with my personal position in MJ GLEESON (LON:GLE)

Johnson Service (LON:JSG) (102p - mkt cap £447m) - update for FY 12/2022 last week reassures, with performance in line with expectations. Net bank debt modest at £14m. Share buyback ongoing. Energy - almost two thirds of usage for 2023 is now fixed in price (don’t know at what level). Cost inflation a “challenge” but actions taken to mitigate it. Nothing said about outlook for 2023.

My opinion - profitability looks to have recovered back to pre-covid levels, but EPS less so - since the share count has risen from 372m in 2019, to 439m now, 18% more shares to spread earnings over. PER is about 14, which looks about right to me. Forecasts for 2023 have come down a fair bit, now at 7.1p EPS. Bulls must be hopeful that it’s going to beat expectations in 2023 and beyond, because on current earnings forecasts the valuation doesn’t excite me.

Creo Medical (LON:CREO) (23p - mkt cap £41m) - this looks extremely high risk. It’s burned through a lot of cash, and is now running out. Cash was £26m at June 2022, now down to only £13m, implying it’s going to need a fresh fundraise in H1 2023 - good luck with that, as the market seems to have little appetite to pour fresh money into jam tomorrow companies right now. I’d steer well clear of this, no matter how exciting the story is, it’s uninvestable until a refinancing has been done - not just a top-up either, but a proper refinancing to take it through to profitability. Although it does say the heavy development spend & launch phase is “coming to an end”. Company confirms it needs more cash -

“the Board is considering a number of options to ensure that the Group is sufficiently funded to meet its stated growth ambitions.”




Disclaimer

This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

56 comments


Avatar for LeoInvestorUK

Regarding MPAC (LON:MPAC), since I presented this at Mello Stockslam and have been positive about it in various other places I feel I should disclose that I sold my remaining holding today due to revenue recognition concerns following an approximate £15.5m reduction in the forecasts for cash published today. I was also concerned to hear that the FREYR QCP contract appears to have been delayed another 6 months. I have gone into more detail publicly elsewhere.

30
Avatar for AnonymousUser1822519

Tungsten West (LON:TUN) is looking like a multibagger candidate. Price jumped up 20 percent this morning on updated feasibility study but has since pulled back to 9 percent up. Stockopedia's price target is 100p. Expecting it to head in that direction in the next year or two. I bought in last week before todays RNS so in good profit already.

2
Avatar for Silver Moon

That wouldn't be the Drakelands Mine at Hemerdon by any chance? It was only a couple of years ago when my Wolf Minerals investment got severely stung. Wolf became QBS Flywheel Ltd and my money got lost along the way although I suspect mining never ceased, the ore being taken to Plymouth for processing. Naturally I am somewhat sore still. Unfortunately Google Earth's view hasn't been updated in recent years.

3
Avatar for AnonymousUser1822519

That's the one. I just checked out a wiki of Wolf minerals, they went into liquidation I see! Not sure why TUN have acquired the Mine unless they saw something that Wolf Minerals didn't. Perhaps mine survey tech has advanced considerably since when Wolf had ownership. 

It's alwas a good idea to postion size according to the risk though. Wouldn't want new buyers to follow the same ending as Wolf.

2
Avatar for Silver Moon

There's a very small free float and I would expect a cash-call being on the cards as the runway appears to be of less than one year. I think after liquidation in 2018 Wolf became a shell company until 2021. Personally I suffered a one for 66 share dilution followed by a one for 5 when QBS Flywheel surfaced. I must have some shares today somewhere.  I wouldn't touch Tungsten west with a barge-pole and I say good luck to anybody who buys.

2
Avatar for yiannos1

Although I am not a holder of Tungsten , it is clear that they will not need a fundraise as there is already an agreement for a 30m investment from a venture capital firm and with no dilution for existing shareholders( royalty fees ). This figure is more than enough for operations to begin.

However , the key issue is the remaining two important licenses that have not been granted.  Without them operations cannot commence , and thus the collapse of the share price from its listing. 

2
Avatar for Rusty2

If anyone is wondering why Luceco (LON:LUCE) is up nearly 10%, it was tipped in SCSW apparently.

17
Avatar for Lochinver

Will be very interesting to hear LUCEs update later  this week 

2
Avatar for The Boon Fund

I've always looked at Iqe (LON:IQE) ij the past and scratched my head.

Can someone explain in a few bullet points whwre the value is in this company? I look at the Financials and can't see the Financials driving the value. The macro for chipmaking is currently very bad. Is there a key value driver here to justify the £400m+ market cap? M&A, patents, etc?

8
Avatar for SundayTrader

A few bullet points re Iqe (LON:IQE)

  • It is not a chipmaker, it makes the wafer needed for compound semi-conductor chips. These are a niche product needed for various high-performance tasks.  The biggest chunk of revenues comes from mobile phones.
  • The market for compound semi-conductor chips is expected to grow at double-digit rates for some time to come.
  • It supplies about 50% of the world market for such wafer, and nearer 100% of the traded market.
  • It has a high reputation for quality - critical in this business. Its wafer is specified by end-users such as Samsung and Apple.
  • Gross margins are currently growing, as the market demands more complex wafers which are sold at a better price.
  • The bear case is, as Paul has rightly pointed out, that the company has a poor track record of profitability.  The current valuation is pinning its hopes on the efforts of the new CEO who came in last year, replacing the founder/entrepreneur who previously occupied the role.
17
Avatar for The Boon Fund

Thanks SundayTrader! That's really informative. But cutting-edge mobile customers seems to be a very difficult place to be a supplier... you only have two choices, Apple or Samsung...!

No wonder they can't turn a profit. Their customers have really squeezed them for margin, given that they know there's n-one else for Iqe (LON:IQE) to bring their products to.

2
Avatar for davidjhill

Not really - their customer list is pretty big and far from reliant on either Apple or Samsung. Secondly both of those two have relatively little choice but to use Iqe (LON:IQE) so their pricing power is actually fine. But photonics are also used much much more widely than mobile phones.

Nonetheless the previous CEO for me was far too tech focused and not nearly enough commercial which has held the shares back significantly imo. He also took a lot of compensation for what I consider to be a frankly weak performance. Neither of those things sat well with investors understandably.

He has now moved aside for a very commercial CEO who knows the market well. He has already started to do the right things but it is unsurprising it will take 12-18 months before investors see those fruits. I'm neutral until I see that change start to bear fruit.

6
Avatar for The Boon Fund

That's interesting insight, thank you!

2
Avatar for MichaelFBS

Thank you for the prodigious output from both you since the New Year. Extraordinary. So much that I havent yet had time to read/listen to it all.

Regards

Michael

18
Avatar for Snazzytime

Inland Homes (LON:INL)

Recently appointed CEO scarpers after just 5 weeks.

Short RNS reads;

Inland Homes announces that the recently appointed Chief Executive Officer, Donagh O'Sullivan has resigned from the Group with immediate effect by mutual agreement. Accordingly, he has stepped down from the Board

Snazzy

19
Avatar for Shrubby

The good news about stockopedia is that it works and mostly we get sense. This morning I logged in to Interactive Investor to discover they'd changed their platform over the weekend and it doesn't work .......

Anyone recommend an alternative online broker to put the wisdom on this site to good use ??

Don't know where Abrdn (LON:ABDN) shares are this morning, but they've just shot themselves in the foot...pah !

14
Avatar for ridavies

Hello Shrubby.  I agree on Interactive Investor.  Where are the current changes in SPs, the % changes?.  All very useful quick checks.

Where are the Buy / Sell quotes so quickly available?

Oh dear! Gone, gone, gone!!!!!!  Why unless they have gone somewhere and I cant find them.  

11
Avatar for Mikex1

If you put your portfolio into a Watch List (which they haven't changed), SPs and quotes still available.

2
Avatar for peterg

With regards to Interactive Investor web changes, I seem to be in a minority, at least amongst those posting here and elswhere, but I'm happy with the changes.

In answer to your question about where are current changes in SP etc,  click on the 3 vertical dots to the left of Group By, and open the Column configurator. Then choose the ones you want

6
Avatar for G Morris

Telephoned them. Very helpful and gave instructions on how to reconfigure layout,   said to contact back if any problems.

2
Avatar for G Morris

Three dots on left of screen can give option to bring up daily change on Interactive Investor screen. Use them and looking at changing  with other news regarding the parent company  ABDN today, through one of it's charities  been sponsering the Resolultion Foundation that's pushing for a cap  of £100,000 on ISA's.  Sorry for off topic but talk of killing own economic model.

5
Avatar for Silver Moon

Shrubby, only a few minutes ago I told my spouse about this, and said Abrdn just could not keep its fingers out of the works already having messaged ii with my complaint.  If enough ii account holders do the same soon enough it may save us the trouble of moving.

6
Avatar for Brookeda

Good idea I will send them a mail later. 

2
Avatar for Roger Lawson

Yes a horrible software update at II. When a transaction completes you don't get all the details reported such as stamp duty,. commissions etc. A horribly complicated transaction report which you can't even print out sensibly. A really amateurish "downgrade". 

11
Avatar for MichaelFBS

I can’t believe this about the confirmation, that was something good about the old system but printing out Roger!  This is the 21st century :-)

Meant in jest in case lost in the typing.

Regards

Michael.

4
Avatar for Defender122

Sorry I don’t know too much about ii  pc platform, but their new app works great on my iPhone.

 



2
Avatar for MichaelFBS

Oh dear I am yet to use it yet (just a quick look) but from the comments here it sounds a disaster.  I hope it will not force me to move.  Transferring SIPPS is a nightmare. 

Why do these companies fiddle and do they ask the user before fiddling? Certainly not this one.

4
Avatar for Silver Moon

So you bought or sold some shares on your iPhone did you? When I did on my desktop the confirmation pop-up didn't tell me the prices! Now I have to wait until ii can put out the contract notes for me to find out.  Roger Lawson points out something  else - no commission or Stamp Duty if applicable.

2
Avatar for andrewdb

On Barratt Developments (LON:BDEV)

"But it’s now trading at par with NTAV, so is hardly over-priced."
Not sure about that

I am not aware of how many houses BDEV need to sell to keep the lights on but...  I remember Stanley Gibbons backed by assets that they valued at 100m, until they tried to sell some.
and I remember buying a house in the late 80s for 78k and in the early 90s it was worth ~60k

So
If you are a long term holder, suggest closing your eyes for a few years, I sold my house for 112k in 97
Otherwise I would wait until BDEV is at an appropriate discount to NTAV (or you think the housing market has reached a low)

I think (unless interest rates drop rapidly) that the cost of a mortgage will be rising v. quickly and by a lot over the next year, house prices are set at the point where a sale is made, so that price is likely to fall.

9
Avatar for jonno

Further canny business by Avingtrans (LON:AVG), which is trading in line; it is to pay £825k for an additional £5.3m revenue and assets of £750k.  I have no doubt that these figures will over time improve significantly, once management at Avingtrans applies its skillset.

I hold.

"In addition, the Board is delighted to announce that Avingtrans' business unit, Ormandy Group, which designs, manufactures and services off-site plant, heat exchangers and other HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning) products, has acquired the business and assets of Hevac Limited ("Hevac"), a heating ventilation and air conditioning solutions provider based in Elland, Yorkshire and the business and assets of HeatExchangeSpares.com ("HES") a plates and gaskets supplier, based in Watford (together the "Acquisitions"). The total consideration for the Acquisitions is expected to be £825k which will be funded from the Group's existing cash resources. In the latest reported financial year, ended December 2021, the combined businesses and assets generated £5.3m of sales and a loss before tax of £0.3m. Gross assets acquired total £750k."

11
Avatar for TheFloatingInvestor

Not strictly small cap but I think its interesting.

I have been crunching some numbers on overlooked sectors and thought I would share. These are the FTSE 350 indices of sectors that I picked up that appear to be trading significantly below pre covid levels. I like to forget about what happened during and after COVID and use a pre covid high point (within a couple of months of the COVID crash) to assess where trading is.

A note of warning, you need to check out the company constituents  that appear in these sectors, these ones taken from I.G, But gives an idea of possible overlooked and unloved sectors.

FTSE 350 Household Goods and Home Construction - Down (42%)

FTSE 350 Healthcare equip and services - Down (35%)

FTSE 350 Mining - Down (32%) (Not reflective of sector gains due to companies inc.)

FTSE 350 Travel and Leisure - Down (31%)

FTSE 350 Food Producers - Down (26%)

FTSE 350 Real Estate Investing Trusts- Down (26%)

FTSE 350 Software and Computers - Down (24%)

FTSE 350 Financial Services - Down (21%)

There may be others, but these are a snap shot of underperformers, some of which I think are starting to build some momentum from lows.

For clarity I currently hold Home Goods and Construction(I.G), Mining (GIGB), Travel and Leisure(I.G), and REIT(I.G).

24
Avatar for thirty fifty twenty

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) at 312p is a near 40% discount to NAV which has grown c.10% a year for c.20 years.  today they announce a buy back of only £1m against MV of £120m. however the shares are tightly held and average daily volume is only 20,000 shares.  So a £1m buyer in the market is a significant support.  director reckon that discount should be <20%.

B.P. Marsh & Partners (LON:BPM) 2 biggest investments are in. insurance (benefits from. hardening rates?) and financial advice (currently growth area?)

chat is excellent long  term tend.  i hold. 

14
Avatar for Martin_576

A HUGE weekends work - the SCVR really makes the subscription essential for me

94
Avatar for Paul Scott

Marvellous! Make sure you tell the boss!!  ;-)

48
Avatar for gmtrader

The building sector is something I am interested in. The share price of builders tend to be about 12 months ahead of actual events so it is possible they have bottomed now, but I am guessing they may have 1 more leg down when results of actual profits come out and show a drop in their profits. So I am going for a 6 month period where I hope that will be the bottom.

Looking at the recent rise in this sector, it seems to be in tandem with the recent rise of the indices. The indices look to have broken out of downward trends, except the FTSE which has remained strong but could be in for a small drop now after hitting new highs since 2018 and is only about 60 points of all time highs. The US indices are at a point where they could go either way but there are indicators showing a break in the downward trend, so maybe a drop before they continue to rise further. I can see FTSE hitting new all time highs later in the year, possible hitting 8300 or higher. First though, we need to see the results of companies in the next 6 months which should show the negative effects of inflation. We have not really seen the effect of customers credit crunch yet which leaves me to believe there is a little more pain to come before we see the next bull run. No one knows for sure what will happen and this is only my take on things. If we get one more leg down then I will be a buyer and if I am wrong and it continues up from here, then it is just a confirmation that the downtrend has ended and the next bull run has started. Either way, by the end of 2023 I think investors will be feeling a lot happier.

27
Avatar for BnB

Last week in the SCVR, I commented briefly on Robert Walters (LON:RWA) after the firm issued a moderate-sized profit warning. The general gist of my comment was that I could see a good entry for a high quality business, but I cautioned that a better price, 10% - 20% below the current level of GBP 500, might loom in the near future. I’m grateful to Paul for picking up on this update this morning.

Doing some research this weekend, I noted that many cyclical stocks have enjoyed an excellent start to the new year. And this on top of a big bounce from the October lows, amounting to a 40% - 50% rise in many beaten up names from the autumn. However, when we look at RWA and its fellow recruiters like Pagegroup (LON:PAGE) and Hays (LON:HAS) I note that the bounce is no greater than 10%.

Something doesn’t add up. Recruitment is a leading indicator of macro conditions. RWA et al will be recovering from a downturn well ahead of smokestack industrials and autos, yet the stocks are lagging. One plausible explanation might be that those more capital-intensive names had simply been more heavily oversold. But this got me thinking. What if, as some economists are now predicting, the general tightness in the global labour market persists and the re-opening in China fundamentally improves the macro environment in Europe and Asia such that the recession in Europe is more shallow than formerly feared and no material slowdown afflicts China and its satellites from Japan to Malaysia to Australia? Wouldn’t that be extremely positive for a recruiter whose biggest markets are in Asia and Europe?

Operationally, Asia, which represents a huge 45% of revenues, saw a difficult quarter which amounted for much of the miss, but that was a period severely handicapped by the Chinese lockdown and fears of a global recession. The shift in China’s pandemic policy and its multi-faceted about-turn in economic stimulus has rewritten the macro not just for its own economy but also for its Asian satellites and its trade partners in Western Europe. In short I expect to see a loosening of hiring restrictions. And the UK business, a basket case still deeply mired in recessionary concerns, yet fallen to only 15% of revenues, can be safely ignored.

As for management, I have a very high opinion of Robert Walters himself, whom I met as young professional many years ago, and against whose business I’ve competed over decades. There is no shadow of a doubt that RW will steer his eponymous ship through any choppy waters in 2023 and I expect to see an aggressive buyback of shares should weakness persist, just as occurred in 2016 and 2019.

I’m coming round to the view that, absent a general sell-off which sinks all boats, today’s price is rather attractive. Excluding the exceptional circumstances of the pandemic, the last slowdown in 18/19 saw the firm valued at an EV/EBITDA of 6x and a PER of 12x. Today the firm sits on multiples of 4x and 9x respectively and pays a nearly doubled dividend. Furthermore, the relative appeal of RWA compared to other quality cyclicals is at a particular high today.

What could go wrong? There is a counter-argument that, historically, the lows in share price have arisen up to 12 months after peak earnings – and my thesis depends on the realisation of my hunch that Asia will rebound and earnings will hold up. If we go into a global recession, then all bets are off and a price below GBP 400 is in prospect. Nevertheless, that would still represent a better performance in those circumstances than I would expect for the more volatile cyclicals to which I have compared the stock today. The other possible negative outcome would be that trading picks up at RWA but stays depressed at its more UK-focused rivals like Hays with the result that the market keeps a negative rating on the whole sector and RWA’s rating stays depressed. We’ve seen that occur with the fall in SThree (LON:STEM)’s rating despite continued strong performance. Finally, revenues in permanent recruitment, which makes up two thirds of RWA's mix, come with a lag of about two months to account for wavering decisions and notice period expiries. Any revenue-based recognition of an improvement in prospects will come with a built-in lag of about a quarter.

My conclusion? I’m opening a one third position at today’s levels, leaving cash in reserve for the dual eventualities of a general sell-off that delivers a price around GBP 450, or a lowered outlook on the 9th March TU - a date which might come too soon for management to be confident of a rebound in Asia. And another thought. I think anyone who is minded to take profits on cyclicals that have probably risen too far too fast, but who wishes to remain fully invested in case of more benign market conditions, could possibly re-purpose those profits into RWA at a greater margin of safety yet retain excellent potential upside.

90
Avatar for carvalio

BnB thank you for that (and all your previous) balanced well written informative comment about recruiters. I don't have anything to add, but I really enjoy reading them.

27
Avatar for Michael C

BnB - I agree with all you say about Robert Walters (LON:RWA) but net cash has fallen in 12 months by £30.2m (24%) from £126.6m to £96.4m, and only £3.5m of that is accounted for by the share buybacks in Q4. I don't have time to research this right now and neither you nor Paul have mentioned the fall in net cash  so I think I need to know the reason before buying.

6
Avatar for BnB

The most benign explanation I can think of is that there has been a shift in the perm/ctr mix, described in the TU as a "notable uptick in contract recruitment" that would result in a substantial call on cash to fund extra contractors. Each new contract adds a cash requirement that is approximately twice its gross monthly value and usually takes about a year to become cash neutral. I could easily see this adding GBP 10m to the working capital requirement, based on current ctr t/o in the region of GBP 400m. But I would expect a slowdown in remittances to account for a substantial balance. Across the contract book this could mean clients stretching payments out beyond another month end, which would make a big difference to cash flow. Within perm this would entail a slowing of fee payments during uncertain times.

All of the above would be quite normal for recruitment and it tends to take a quarter where such phenomena prevail for the credit control function to get its act in gear. If I'm right then you would expect to see a reversal in the next six months - unless contractor numbers go ballistic, which I do not expect.

11
Avatar for Michael C

Replying to BnB and myself I have done a little research and I am reassured.  My conclusion is that a big chunk of the cash has been spent on buy-backs, cash is generally managed sensibly and the more I learn about this business the more confident I am that this is to be expected. See spreadsheet below.

My only remaining question is why the Stocko figures for net debt (minus because the business usually operates with net cash) are so different from the figures in the annual accounts for 2019-2021 inclusive. The figure for 2018 is about the same but the subsequent 3 years are very different. I have used RNS and annual accounts figures in my spreadsheet.

PS: Does anyone know how to format a spreadsheet so that it will fit in a comments box?

Robert Walters RWA LSE

Buy-Backs
Change in net cash
DATE
Cost £m Average price Net cash £m Total Excluding Buy-Backs
31/12/21 FY/21

126.6


07/04/22 Q1/22 4.70 6.62 105.9 -20.7 -20.7 *
06/07/22 Q2/22 8.00 6.05 81.6 -24.3 -16.3
11/10/22 Q3/22 6.60 4.90 93.5 11.9 18.5
10/01/23 Q4/22 3.50 4.97 96.4 2.9 6.4
Totals 22.8

-30.2 -12.1








Net Cash


Stockopedia
From accounts Change Positive cash flows from operations?

FY/18 74.2
74.3
Yes

FY/19 10.3
85.8 11.5 Yes

FY/20 91.7
155.5 69.7 Yes

FY/21 126.6
126.6 -28.9 Yes

Q4/22 16.5
96.4 -30.2 tbc

* shares bought back in Q1/22 were bought by the Group's Employee Benefit Trust and are therefore not included as a cash cost to the company - I'm not entirely sure that's right but don't have time to get to the bottom of it.

5
Avatar for Robert W

You can copy and paste as a picture into the thread.  

Re debt discrepancy: IFRS 16?

2
Avatar for Silver Moon

Good morning BnB, 

My note to Self: RWA is at 518 pence/share, up 3.6% after Paul’s SCRVR came out. I hold Robert Walters (LON:RWA) in 2 folios, bought at 516 and 562 pence/share although previously I had sold a batch in 2019 at 609 pence and another in 2022 at 808 pence. So, to buy more now as the man said, what could possibly go wrong?  A 4.7% dividend, probably to go ex-dividend next April or May and the company carrying no debt. Stocko says it’s a Mid-Cap Speculative Contrarian. On this basis I sold the EMIS (LON:EMIS) which has been pending being taken over for so long that I am fed up in missing new opportunities in my ISA and have bought Robert Walters (LON:RWA) with the proceeds just now.

Silver

6
Avatar for Tortoise investor

"Recruitment is a leading indicator of macro conditions."

Are you sure? There will be others' far more knowledgeable than me on this site who may have a counter view but I thought the general economists' view is it is a lagging indicator as firms are slow to adjust staffing cutbacks to falling demand - they tend not to predict it in advance. This IMF economist says here for example: 'Because unemployment follows growth with a delay, it is considered a lagging indicator of economic activity.' Admittedly unemployment isn't quite the same as recruitment but they surely closely follow. 

Your view on that is pretty key for deciding whether now is the time to invest in recruiters. I'd personally want to pay very cheaply for recruiters right now to allow for the risk they lag behind wider economic conditions. Although I think there is also a general view that we're not expecting high unemployment so maybe recruiters won't be terribly affected and we also know in some sectors, like hospitality and retail, there are significant problems with workforce recruitment. 

9
Avatar for BnB

Yes, unemployment is a lagging indicator but recruitment trends looks to the future. You might just have to trust me on this although there's an article in the FT on Robert Walters (LON:RWA) last week that makes the same claim. Think from your own experience how quickly the FD imposes a hiring freeze whenever bad news looks to be around the corner! At the far end of a recession, departments are running on fumes so hiring picks up very quickly, particularly in skill-scarce occupations like IT and engineering - if it has fallen much at all!

However if you're cautious on recruiters today I think you're sensible. But they are not all alike and RWA is Asia-focused, which is the basis for my shift in confidence. And note I only bought a one third position this morning. I'm cautious too. You can probably wait 6-12 months for the whole  sector to start to move upwards decisively

7
Avatar for MrContrarian

My morning smallcap tweet: It Ain't Half Shot Mum

Amigo Holdings (LON:AMGO) MJ Hudson (LON:MJH) Spectral MD Holdings (LON:SMD) Ashtead Technology Holdings (LON:AT.) Invinity Energy Systems (LON:IES) Totally (LON:TLY) Quixant (LON:QXT) Iqe (LON:IQE) Zenova (LON:ZED) Tekmar (LON:TGP) Intelligent Ultrasound (LON:IUG) Ondo InsurTech (LON:ONDO) Poolbeg Pharma (LON:POLB) Quadrise Fuels International (LON:QFI) Ilika (LON:IKA), MPAC (LON:MPAC), Avingtrans (LON:AVG)

◄Amigo (AMGO)► unable to secure a commitment from a cornerstone investor to underwrite the whole of the capital raise. "A number of investors have expressed possible interest in making a minority investment. Amigo is therefore assessing whether there is sufficient interest for a syndicate of such investors to be formed in order to support a £45m Capital Raise." Will wind-up co if unable to succeed. [SP=3.9 Cap=19m]

◄MJ Hudson (MJH)► confirms indications of interest for certain divisions of the business. Trading weak. [SP=13 Cap=27m]

◄Spectral MD (SMD)► guides FY-Dec rev above mkt exp, EBITDA loss and cash materially ahead. Cites strong execution of Burn clinical studies and related development activities as well as the expansion of the current BARDA contract. [SP=31.3 Cap=43m]

◄Ashtead Technology (AT.)► guides FY-Dec rev up c.30% and adj EBITDA modestly ahead of mkt exp. [SP=334.68 Cap=267m]

◄Invinity Energy Systems (IES)► MoU with Dawsongroup to develop UK battery rental offering.Dawsongroup has purchased a 0.22 MWh Invinity VS3 as a demonstrator. [SP=39 Cap=46m]

◄Totally (TLY)► wins £10m PA contract to provide national NHS 111 contingency services, initially for 1 year with a 1 yr option. [SP=35 Cap=68m]

◄Quixant (QXT)► guides FY-Dec rev £120m, slightly ahead of market expectations (rev $115.2m and adj pretax $10.1m). Adj pretax also slightly ahead of market expectations.Order book strong. [SP=169.58 Cap=111m]

◄IQE (IQE)► guides FY-Dec rev c. 8% up. Provisions for a small number of doubtful debts and the 're-phasing' of rev from one contract from Q4 to Q1 2023. Constant currency revenue is expected to be broadly in line. [SP=59.64 Cap=480m]

◄Zenova (ZED)► Big Battery (USA's largest lithium battery supplier) places a first order for the FX500 mini extinguisher. Expects more substantial orders in the near future. [SP=11.5 Cap=11m]

◄Tekmar (TGP)► a preferred partner given another 14 days for alternate debt or equity financing proposals. Does not prevent an offer being made for the Company by a third party. [SP=17 Cap=10m]

◄Intelligent Ultrasound (IUG)► guides FY-Dec rev up 33% despite reseller markets in Europe and Asia down 19% to £1.7m, largely due to impact of Covid-19 on the Chinese market. In line? [SP=8.48 Cap=27m]

◄Ondo InsurTech (ONDO)► contract with insurer Topdanmark to expand roll-out to 20,000 new customers in Denmark. COO says "this deal shows our commitment to roll out LeakBot across more of our customer base". [SP=6.02 Cap=4m]

◄Poolbeg Pharma (POLB)► strategic expansion of POLB 001 into oncology. "Scientific findings indicate POLB 001 has the potential to dampen the pro-inflammatory cytokine release syndrome affecting patients receiving CAR T cell therapies." [SP=9.55 Cap=48m]

◄Quadrise Fuels International (QFI)► projects update. "Whilst we are frustrated with the delays that we have faced in progressing some of our projects, we remain confident that these will be overcome soon." [SP=1.7 Cap=24m]

◄Ilika (IKA)► MoU with Cirtec Medical to collaborate in the manufacturing and commercialisation of miniature Stereax solid-state batteries. [SP=35 Cap=55m]

In line: MPAC, AVG

102
Avatar for Tortoise investor

Amazing commentary from you both at the moment - really going above and beyond in providing so many updates.

This is a bit off topic but I know you have passionately argued that company disclosure around takeovers should be dramatically improved with much more transparency. There's a Bill before the House of Lords at the moment called the Financial Services and Markets Bill which might provide a legislative vehicle for change (assuming legislation, rather than regulator guidance, is required). Maybe Lord Lee might like to raise it as part of this?  It's going into Committee from 25 January. Usually in the Lords they raise issues at Committee stage through dummy amendments and then push them to a vote at Report stage. 

Presumably an amendment could be along the lines of 'Any publicly listed company must inform shareholders of a formal takeover offer within 7 days of receiving that offer'. Or something like that  - I am sure Parliamentary draftsmen would help Lord Lee if he was interested and the Government will usually refine amendments if it is prepared to accept them.   

I'd contact Lord Lee myself but I have an interest in this Bill through my work so it could be perceived as a bit of a conflict of interest - but thought I'd flag the potential opportunity in case.

38
Avatar for Paul Scott

Morning Patrick,

Nice idea. I think the wording of any legislation would have to be quite loose, otherwise companies would dodge having to declare anything. So rather than "formal takeover offer" (which would have to be disclosed anyway), the wording would need to be something that required disclosure of all credible takeover approaches which result in negotiations starting.

That way, speculative or disruptive type takeover approaches could be ignored. To my mind, the key trigger point needs to be when negotiations start, with a credible third party - i.e. someone who can demonstrate the financial firepower to get a deal done. That should be the point when it has to be disclosed to the market.

A lot of companies do this already, when they receive a bid approach, but it should be mandatory I think. The current set up is absurd, where serious negotiations on a bid can go on for months, with nothing being said to the market, thus creating a false market in the shares.

We're only told the truth when someone leaks it to Sky News! Bonkers.

Regards, Paul.

23
Avatar for Roger Lawson

Judging what is a "credible" takeover offer is not at all easy. And any bidder would not want disclosure until they have had discussions, done some due diligence, etc,. This is not as simple a matter as you make out. From my experience of running companies you often get "approaches" about a deal and you would not want to disclose them (even if potentially credible) because it would demoralise your staff. 

8
Avatar for Funnymoney

Yes, but why 7 days? If somebody makes an offer they should put that in writing accompanied by a statement of the means with which they can finance that offer. That should be a public statement. Why should the directors have advanced knowledge that they may be losing their company? I think we have just accepted that the way things are done at the moment is the right way, rather than asking the question: what is in the best interests of shareholders?

5
Avatar for MichaelFBS

I agree. I cannot remember where I learnt it (maybe it was Middlesex Poly before I dropped out in year to. I was doing accounting) but in the law module it was emphasised how directors were stewards of the company on behalf of the shareholders. I genuinely think that with few exceptions (Buffett) that has been forgotten.

As an aside I would add Tim Cook at Apple (NSQ:AAPL). I was screening for reduced share count over the weekend and was amazed to see that in the universe of US shares Apple had bought back more shares in %age terms (and probably $ terms as well) than any other company. Share count is now 61% of the total 10 years ago. No wonder Berkshire Hathaway (NYQ:BRK.A) is still a buyer.  Won’t be long and they will own the company.

Regards

Michael. 

9
Avatar for Monty Carlo

Is this not the concern of the Takeover Panel, which is an independent regulatory body, rather than primary legislation?

The Takeover Code is quite a comprehensive piece of work that has evolved over many decades. It allows for market participants to seek the opinion of the Panel as to whether action is required - a far more flexible and rapid approach than anything that could ever be achieved through the courts?

Whilst I understand the frustration expressed by those who traded shares while a potential approach was under wraps, surely the inverse is also true - if every vague approach has to be declared properly before the potential acquiror has a chance to complete their due diligence and declare a formal, firm bid you end up with umpteen spurious announcements, most of which fall away?

This is potentially worse?

If companies have to declare even vague approaches that are not firm bids (and directors need time and advice to ascertain whether a bid approach is credible & viable or not, whilst acquirors need time to get their financing ducks in a row) then the potential bidders can't be held accountable & you've just written a charter for pump & dump merchants to exploit?

The current world is not perfect, but the alternatives can be far worse if we are not very careful.

The Takeover Code (known as the "Blue Book" in the City) is worth a skim through - you soon realise why Directors hire a corporate finance adviser.

9
Avatar for Equity Development

 In a Trading Update today, MPAC (LON:MPAC) reports performance for the year to 31 December 2022 in line with expectations, with a strong FY22 closing order book; the outlook for FY23 is “encouraging”. We have raised our FY22 (adj.) EBITDA outlook by 8% and FY23 by 13%.

Reflecting resilient demand in the core Healthcare and Food & Beverage segments, order intake in the second half of FY22 was significantly above first half levels, leading to a healthy year-end closing order book of £69.0m (H1 22: £62.6m). In addition, Service order intake and contribution to revenue continued to grow. Mpac adds that, inclusive of modified specifications, the development and installation of the clean energy project for FREYR remains on track for completion in Q2 23.

Mpac was required to adjust its operations to meet the impact of the worldwide disruption of supply chains and related macro-economic factors. The response was good management of components sourcing and stock levels, in addition to alternative routes of sourcing. This resulted in the ability to better meet customers’ expectations and, in H2, improve profitability. The exercise required additional working capital – in areas such as inventory build - and adapting to lengthened project build timing, for which we estimate Mpac has ample balance sheet resources. We expect the pressure on working capital to unwind in H1 23, with estimated FY22 year-end net debt of £4.2m reverting towards an estimated 31 December 2023 net cash position of £5.3m.

Our fair value for Mpac remains 485p/share, indicative of a FY24 EV/EBITDA multiple of 7.9x compared to 4.6x at current EV.

https://www.equitydevelopment.co.uk/research/trading-update-fy22-in-line-and-fy23-encouraging

14
Avatar for thirty fifty twenty

SIG (LON:SHI) a big plus here is that the ex CEO of Grafton (LON:GFTU) is joining a CEO in early February. the profit and share price performance of Grafton was exceptional over c.14 years he was in charge.  It seems reasonable to conclude that he must see great business potential in SIG (LON:SHI) as he is unlikely to need the money or hassle to risk his reputation. 

he also used to own shares in Grafton bought with personal money so i am expecting a decent RNS worth surveyor share but in coming weeks. 

chart downtrend now looks firmly broken.  i hold. 

11
Avatar for JASVFS

Thank you for your comment on Steppe Cement Paul, I never thought of myself as an adventurous investor so that made me smile this morning, (we hold).  I'd appreciate your take on Tekmar's interesting update too,  more loyal than adventurous could this be read as promising?

5
Avatar for Paul Scott

Morning JASVFS - re Steppe Cement (LON:STCM) - I don't think a cement seller in Kazakhstan, listed on AIM, is likely to be seen as a blue chip!  ;-)

Thanks for flagging the Tekmar (LON:TGP) update. It seems to just be extending the time period for an interested party to complete due diligence. I don't like this bit though, which suggests dilution could happen around 10p (share price currently 17p) -

The proposal being considered represents a strategic investment from a global institutional investor in the energy sector, which would provide funding for the Company to follow an ambitious plan for growth, both organically and by acquisition and would not result in an offer being made for the Company's shares but would represent new capital investment, at or around the share price at the time exclusivity was granted in November 2022, and would allow the Company to retain its admission to trading on AIM.

Regards, Paul.

9
Avatar for illiswilgig

Tekmar (LON:TGP) (I hold a little - probably not for long) I'm with Paul on this one. Don't like the look of this mornings announcement at all.

Looks like a massively discounted placing with an institutional investor - which will significantly dilute existing shareholders as well. Though can't be more than the 30% limit? Which would only allow them to raise 3m? Why bother? Why wouldn't existing shareholders fund a placing if the growth opportunity is so good? 

I like the business but not the balance  sheet.  Shareholder communications has not been good and I lack faith in the management. Kicking myself for not selling my small holding at recent highs.  Expecting to sell some today at much lower prices,

cheers

Mark

9
Get the free newsletter