REG - Artemis Resources Ld - Osborne JV Exploration Update
22/08/2022 07:00
For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
http://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20220822:nRSV6963Wa&default-theme=true
RNS Number : 6963W Artemis Resources Limited 22 August 2022
22 August 2022
Artemis Resources Limited
(ASX/AIM: ARV, FRA: ATY, US: ARTTF)
Osborne JV Exploration Update
Artemis Resources Limited ("Artemis" or the "Company") (ASX:ARV, AIM:ARV,
Frankfurt: ATY, US OTCQB: ARTTF) is pleased to provide an update on the maiden
drill program at the Osborne Nickel Prospect, a joint venture project owned
100% by Artemis with GreenTech Metals Ltd (ASX:GRE) ("GreenTech"), the project
manager, earning up to 51%.
Artemis and its JV partner and Project Manager GreenTech announced on 30 June
2022 that it had commenced the first reverse circulation ("RC") drill hole
designed to test the shallowest portion of the Osborne nickel sulphide target.
The drill program to test the Osborne nickel target consisted of two holes for
a total 598.5m, including 198.5m core drilling. Drilling successfully
intersected the modelled electromagnetic (EM) conductor in the first RC drill
hole with sulphides visually observed in RC chips over a 7m interval from 173m
depth. In consultation with technical consultant Newexco, a decision was
taken by GreenTech to utilise the second RC drill hole as a pre-collar for a
diamond drill 'tail'. The diamond drill core provided greater detail of the
host rocks and the nature of the sulphide mineralisation associated with this
conductive horizon.
RC samples from the first drill hole were sent to the ALS laboratory in Perth
for multi-element analysis. Although the nickel and copper potential of the
sulphides was initially confirmed by handheld pXRF analyser, no significant
nickel or copper results were reported in the laboratory analyses. Similarly,
no significant nickel or copper mineralisation was identified in the drill
chips and core from the second drill hole using a pXRF analyser. Following a
review of all the drilling and geophysical data, Newexco has recommended that
further geophysical interpretation be undertaken prior to any follow-up drill
programs at Osborne.
Competent Person Statements
The information in this document that relates to Osborne exploration results
at the Osborne Nickel Project is based on information compiled by Adrian
Black, a Competent Person who is a Member of the AIG (1364). Mr Black is a
consultant to Greentech Metals Ltd and its subsidiary companies and has
sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and
types of deposits under consideration and to the activity which has been
undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of
the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources
and Ore Reserves (JORC Code).
Thomas Reddicliffe, BSc (Hons), MSc, a Director and Shareholder of the
GreenTech, is a Fellow of the AUSIMM, and has sufficient experience which is
relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under
consideration to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition
of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral
Resources and Ore Reserves'. Thomas Reddicliffe consents to the inclusion in
the report of the information in the form and context in which it appears.
Table 1: Drill Hole Details
Hole ID GDA94/50 GDA94/50 RL Depth Dip Azi Notes
Easting_m Northing_m m m Deg Deg
22OSBRC001 493185 7691903 48 250 -67.7 199.2 RC only. Visual sulphides encountered from 173m downhole
22OSBRC002 493196 7692029 48 348.5 -74.7 192.1 RC pre-collar - 150m
Diamond 'tail' - 198.5m
Figure 1. Drill Holes at Osborne
For further information on the Company, please visit
www.artemisresources.com.au (http://www.artemisresources.com.au) or contact:
Artemis Resources Limited via Camarco
Alastair Clayton
WH Ireland Limited
(Nominated Adviser and Broker)
Jessica Cave / Antonio Bossi / Megan Liddell (Corporate Finance) Tel: +44 20 7220 1666
Harry Ansell / Daniel Bristowe (Corporate Broking) Tel: +44 20 7220 1648
Camarco (Public Relations) Tel: +44 20 3781 9244
Gordon Poole / James Crothers Email: artemis@camarco.co.uk (mailto:artemis@camarco.co.uk)
Emily Hall / Rebecca Waterworth
About Artemis Resources
Artemis Resources (ASX/AIM: ARV; FRA: ATY; US: ARTTF) is a Perth-based
exploration and development company, led by an experienced team that has a
focus on delivering shareholder value from its Pilbara exploration projects -
the Greater Carlow gold-copper project in the West Pilbara and the Paterson
Central gold-copper project in the East Pilbara.
Appendix - Assay Results for drill hole 22OSBRC001
Sample No From_m To_m Co_ppm Cu_ppm Ni_ppm Pb_ppm S_% Zn_ppm
GTM6001 150 151 42 111 258 5 0.03 148
GTM6002 151 152 44 69 239 3 0.03 158
GTM6003 152 153 44 112 270 6 0.03 126
GTM6004 153 154 45 73 354 3 0.02 122
GTM6005 154 155 61 205 358 <2 0.07 132
GTM6006 155 156 47 331 173 2 0.05 166
GTM6007 156 157 49 127 135 4 0.16 170
GTM6008 157 158 55 104 218 2 0.03 124
GTM6009 158 159 42 74 209 2 0.01 117
GTM6010 159 160 47 58 327 10 0.02 133
GTM6011 160 161 45 101 148 3 0.02 132
GTM6012 161 162 45 107 122 2 0.02 142
GTM6013 162 163 66 255 329 <2 0.82 1370
GTM6014 163 164 30 347 189 7 0.86 182
GTM6015 164 165 35 90 107 8 0.13 145
GTM6016 165 166 52 136 176 2 0.16 185
GTM6017 166 167 46 126 159 4 0.13 201
GTM6018 167 168 45 138 146 <2 0.15 192
GTM6019 168 169 57 275 301 3 0.48 268
GTM6020 169 170 53 71 292 3 0.04 163
GTM6021 170 171 49 93 202 <2 0.08 154
GTM6022 171 172 51 78 367 <2 0.09 154
GTM6023 172 173 60 74 424 <2 0.11 193
GTM6024 173 174 60 35 423 4 0.17 196
GTM6026 174 175 65 24 542 3 0.05 235
GTM6027 175 176 53 41 483 3 0.51 298
GTM6028 176 177 54 61 595 <2 1.02 296
GTM6029 177 178 54 68 562 3 1.12 309
GTM6030 178 179 58 174 433 4 2.5 290
GTM6031 179 180 40 37 178 <2 0.26 189
GTM6032 180 181 47 65 160 6 0.05 150
GTM6033 181 182 39 122 75 2 0.11 150
GTM6034 182 183 35 40 32 3 0.13 138
GTM6035 183 184 52 205 126 3 0.23 156
GTM6036 184 185 47 119 131 <2 0.07 149
GTM6037 185 186 47 158 130 <2 0.07 135
GTM6038 186 187 50 168 175 <2 0.08 126
GTM6039 187 188 48 132 187 3 0.1 127
GTM6040 188 189 49 206 160 5 0.12 134
GTM6041 189 190 52 31 318 6 0.02 176
GTM6042 190 191 41 26 501 <2 0.02 142
GTM6043 191 192 52 34 542 4 0.11 248
GTM6044 192 193 51 78 699 3 0.18 129
GTM6045 193 194 59 44 793 6 0.16 164
GTM6046 194 195 63 28 948 4 0.15 156
GTM6047 195 196 25 22 141 11 0.04 90
GTM6048 196 197 23 27 102 11 0.04 87
GTM6049 197 198 44 21 513 7 0.06 119
GTM6050 198 199 40 59 57 <2 0.06 122
GTM6051 199 200 64 61 747 2 0.19 133
GTM6052 200 201 19 20 60 14 0.03 82
GTM6053 201 202 29 35 68 11 0.06 90
GTM6054 202 203 25 28 64 12 0.05 75
GTM6055 203 204 23 24 58 11 0.11 95
GTM6056 204 205 24 27 43 8 0.2 88
GTM6057 205 206 27 43 88 8 0.18 114
GTM6058 206 207 26 38 30 8 0.15 105
GTM6059 207 208 39 20 99 5 0.05 128
GTM6060 208 209 36 11 93 5 0.04 127
GTM6061 209 210 17 64 27 5 0.24 112
GTM6062 210 211 20 129 41 5 0.54 97
GTM6063 211 212 8 60 41 8 0.17 87
GTM6064 212 213 12 28 75 8 0.09 109
GTM6065 213 214 8 40 14 5 0.15 130
GTM6066 214 215 7 93 9 8 0.21 142
GTM6067 215 216 10 71 15 9 0.18 123
GTM6068 216 217 12 66 19 10 0.13 133
GTM6069 217 218 35 58 170 6 0.04 122
GTM6070 218 219 23 63 145 8 0.11 105
GTM6071 219 220 10 73 26 8 0.24 116
GTM6072 220 221 14 49 21 9 0.08 132
GTM6073 221 222 35 76 96 8 0.13 118
GTM6074 222 223 83 44 807 5 0.02 94
GTM6076 223 224 35 21 317 9 0.02 108
GTM6077 224 225 10 14 78 9 0.02 52
GTM6078 225 226 12 40 62 10 0.04 79
GTM6079 226 227 35 212 117 2 0.44 147
GTM6080 227 228 26 23 213 9 0.02 65
GTM6081 228 229 84 29 824 2 0.01 95
GTM6082 229 230 40 37 345 6 0.06 86
GTM6083 230 231 72 48 727 5 0.02 93
GTM6084 231 232 74 77 727 5 0.09 107
GTM6085 232 233 85 30 934 2 0.01 96
GTM6086 233 234 73 37 740 6 0.01 86
GTM6087 234 235 81 26 787 2 0.01 89
GTM6088 235 236 64 32 609 7 0.02 147
GTM6089 236 237 15 68 48 7 0.06 107
GTM6090 237 238 18 85 67 5 0.16 146
GTM6091 238 239 17 69 52 3 0.12 144
GTM6092 239 240 17 61 40 4 0.1 141
GTM6093 240 241 33 105 83 4 0.1 157
GTM6094 241 242 51 246 336 6 0.17 214
GTM6095 242 243 59 162 277 4 0.05 183
GTM6096 243 244 29 43 94 7 0.02 110
GTM6097 244 245 34 45 75 3 0.02 157
GTM6098 245 246 33 42 82 4 0.04 165
GTM6099 246 247 57 79 166 7 0.07 161
GTM6100 247 248 51 84 173 7 0.14 163
GTM6101 248 249 46 126 183 11 0.17 120
GTM6102 249 250 59 93 404 6 0.03 102
GTM6103 249 250 68 109 509 5 0.05 119
JORC Code, 2012 Edition - Table 1 report template
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling techniques · Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or · Samples were collected at one metre intervals in calico bags from a
specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the cyclone and cone splitter attached to a Reverse Circulation (RC) drill rig.
minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF The remainder of the sample (reject) was collected in green mining bags.
instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad
meaning of sampling. · Samples assessed as prospective for nickel mineralisation were taken
in pre-numbered calico bags as single-metre consecutive interval. A typical
· Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity composite sample weighs between 2 and 3kg.
and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.
· A Bruker S1 Titan portable XRF was used to determine prospective
· Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to intervals.
the Public Report.
· Certified Reference Materials (CRM) and blank material were
· In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be alternatively inserted approximately every 25 samples.
relatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m
samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire · Samples were analysed by ALS Global in Perth using a 4-acid digest
assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there with MEICP-61 finish for 34 elements.
is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed
information.
Drilling techniques · Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary · Two Reverse Circulation (RC) drill holes, the second with a NQ
air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or diamond core tail added, were completed on tenements E47/3719 using a face
standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, sampling percussion hammer with 140mm bits. Equipment used was a Austex ED250
whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). drill rig fitted with a Sullair Compressor on board booster and auxiliary unit
fitted with an Atlas Copco Y1260 compressor.
· Holes were drilled at dip angles of -68° and -75° and (magnetic)
azimuth angles of 199° and 192° in order to orthogonally intercept the
modelled EM plates
Drill sample recovery · Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and · The geologist visually assessed and recorded drill sample recoveries
results assessed. during the program, and these were overall very good.
· Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative · RC holes were collared with a well-fitting stuff box to ensure
nature of the samples. material loss to the outside return was minimised. Drilling was undertaken
using an auxiliary compressor and booster to keep the hole dry and lift the
· Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and sample to the sampling equipment. Drill cyclone and splitter were cleaned as
whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of required and after each hole to minimise down hole or cross-hole
fine/coarse material. contamination.
· There were issues with air circulation which resulted in intervals of
the holes being drilled and returning wet samples.
· No relationship between sample recovery and grade has been
undertaken.
Logging · Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and · All drill holes have been geologically logged for lithology,
geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral weathering, alteration, mineralisation and other features of the samples using
Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. sieved rock chips from the reject material.
· Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or · Data was entered in an appropriate database and is of detail suitable
costean, channel, etc) photography. for incorporation (if required) into a mineral resource estimation.
· The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. · All drill holes were logged in full.
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation · If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core · The sample preparation technique carried out in the field is
taken. considered industry best standard practice and was completed by the geological
consultant.
· If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and
whether sampled wet or dry. · RC samples are collected via a cone splitter. Geological logging of
RC chips is completed at site with representative chips being stored in drill
· For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the chip trays.
sample preparation technique.
· Consecutive single metre sample splits were collected and placed into
· Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to a pre-numbered calico bag.
maximise representivity of samples.
· The samples were then sent to ALS Global for sample preparation and
· Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the analysis. Where they will be sorted, dried and pulverised (up to 3kg) to
in situ material collected, including for instance results for field achieve 85% passing 75μm to produce a homogenous representative for analysis.
duplicate/second-half sampling.
· Individual samples were assayed for a suite of 34 elements including
· Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the nickel related analytes as per the laboratory's procedure for a 4-acid
material being sampled. digestion followed by Inductively Coupled Atomic Emission Spectral analysis.
· The sample sizes are considered to be appropriate to correctly
represent base metal sulphide mineralisation and associated geology based on
the style of mineralisation (massive and disseminated sulphides), the
thickness and consistency of the intersections and the sampling methodology.
· The NQ core from the second drill hole was not split, sampled or
assayed as field analysis using a Pxrf revealed no mineralisation that
warranted the laboratory analysis of core samples.
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests · The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and · Assaying was completed by a commercial registered laboratory with
laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or standards and duplicates reported in the sample batch. In addition, nickel
total. Certified Reference Materials (CRM) were inserted into the batch by the
geological consultant at a rate of 1:50 samples.
· For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc,
the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and · No geophysical tools were used to determine any reported element
model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. concentration.
· Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, · Select intervals were measured/estimated on a metre basis using a
duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of Bruker S1 Titan portable XRF with a reading time of 60 seconds per sample.
accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.
Verification of sampling and assaying · The verification of significant intersections by either independent · Assay, sample ID and logging data are matched and validated using
or alternative company personnel. filters in the drill database.
· The use of twinned holes. · Assay results are provided by the laboratory to GreenTech in a csv
file format and then validated and entered into the database managed by an
· Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data external contractor.
verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
· Primary geological and sampling data were recorded on hard copy and
· Discuss any adjustment to assay data. digitally and were subsequently transferred to a digital database where it was
validated by experienced database personnel assisted by the geological
consultant.
· There has been no validation and cross checking of laboratory
performance at this stage.
· Twinned holes have not been used in this program.
Location of data points · Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar · Drill hole collars were initially located and pegged using a handheld
and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in GPS with an expected accuracy of +/-3m for easting, northing and elevation.
Mineral Resource estimation.
· The rig was aligned using compass and gyro
· Specification of the grid system used.
· All drill holes were surveyed using a north seeking gyro and downhole
· Quality and adequacy of topographic control. records taken every 5m at the completion of each hole by the drill contractor.
· The grid system used is GDA94, MGA zone 50.
Data spacing and distribution · Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. · Drill holes were completed at a select geophysical target on tenement
E47/3719
· Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish
the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral · The spacing and distribution of holes is not relevant to this
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. drilling program which is at the exploration stage rather than definition
drilling.
· Whether sample compositing has been applied.
· The drilling to date at the Project is not sufficient to establish
the degree of geological and grade continuity to support the definition of
Mineral Resource and Reserves and the classifications applied under the 2012
JORC code.
· The RC portions of the drill holes were sampled at 1 metre intervals
down hole.
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure · Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of · The drill holes were planned to intersect the modelled geophysical
possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the target zones at a near perpendicular orientation. However, the orientation of
deposit type. key structures may be locally variable and any relationship to mineralisation
has yet to be identified.
· If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the
orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a · No orientation-based sampling bias has been identified in the data to
sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. date.
Sample security · The measures taken to ensure sample security. · All samples collected during the program were transported by Newexco
the geological consultant to an independent third-party commercial transport
contractor who delivered the samples to ALS Global laboratory in Perth for
submission and analysis.
· Sample security was not considered a significant risk to the project,
however only employees of Newexco were involved in the sampling and sample
custody in a remote area. No specific measures were taken o ensure sample
security beyond the normal chain of custody for sample submission.
Audits or reviews · The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. · No formal audits or reviews have been conducted on sampling technique
and data to date.
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status · Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including · GreenTech Metals Ltd, is the operating entity of a Joint Venture with
agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, Artemis Resources Ltd who holds E47/3719.
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites,
wilderness or national park and environmental settings. · The tenement is in good standing with no known impediments.
· The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with
any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
Exploration done by other parties · Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. · The region has a long history of mining (Radio Hill) and exploration
and has been explored for nickel and gold. Andover is currently the focus of a
few companies following the success of Azure Minerals.
· Prior to Greentech's involvement there has been limited work over the
prospect, with historic exploration being restricted to airborne geophysics,
ground geophysics and ground truthing by Legend Mining and Fox Resources
· Historical exploration results and data quality have been considered
during the planning of this drill program.
Geology · Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. · The Osborne prospect is interpreted to be located on the southern
margin of the Andover Mafic intrusive Complex.
· The prospect is overlain by strongly altered schistose and
crystalline ultramafic intrusive rocks; probably mostly pyroxenites and
peridotite. There is minor dolerite (?) and gabbro layers within this
sequence.
Drill hole Information · A summary of all information material to the understanding of the · Drill hole collar locations are shown in the maps and tables included
exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for in the body of the ASX release.
all Material drill holes:
· Two Reverse Circulation (RC) drill holes, the second with an added NQ
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar diamond core tail of 199.5m have been completed during the current nickel
exploration program for a total of 599.5 metres. The drill and sample programs
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the were conducted in July 2022.
drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.
· If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that
the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why
this is the case.
Data aggregation methods · In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, · No data aggregation methods were used.
maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and
cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.
· Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade
results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations
should be shown in detail.
· The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values
should be clearly stated.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths · These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of · No significant mineralisation was encountered. Drill holes were
Exploration Results. planned as perpendicular as possible to intersect the target EM plates so
downhole lengths are usually interpreted to be near true width.
· If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole
angle is known, its nature should be reported.
· If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there
should be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true width
not known').
Diagrams · Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of · Refer to figures and tables in the body of the ASX release.
intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported
These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
locations and appropriate sectional views.
Balanced reporting · Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not · No significant mineralisation was encountered
practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or
widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration
Results.
Other substantive exploration data · Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be · Ground Fixed Loop Electromagnetic survey data from 2007 has been used
reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical to assist targeting drillholes
survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical o Loop Size: 550 x 500m
and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
o Line Separation: 100m
o Station spacing 50m
o System: CRONE 3D PEM
o Current/Frequency: 20A, 5 Hz.
Further work · The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral · No further work is planned as the drill target is considered to have
extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). been adequately tested.
· Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions,
including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas,
provided this information is not commercially sensitive.
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
. END DRLPBMTTMTMTTJTRecent news on Artemis Resources
See all newsREG - Artemis Resources Ld - Quarterly Activities Report
AnnouncementREG - Artemis Resources Ld - Directorate Change
AnnouncementREG - Artemis Resources Ld - Gold Review in West Pilbara
AnnouncementREG - Artemis Resources Ld - Listing of Share Options
AnnouncementRCS - Artemis Resources Ld - Update on Karratha Gold Project
Announcement