REG - East Star Resources - Talovskoye IP Survey Results
15/05/2025 07:00
For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
https://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20250515:nRSO7288Ia&default-theme=true
RNS Number : 7288I East Star Resources PLC 15 May 2025
15 May 2025
East Star Resources Plc
("East Star" or the "Company")
Talovskoye IP Survey Results
Another priority 2025 drill target demonstrating strong geophysical anomalies
Drill rig expected to mobilise to Talovskoye & Rulikha in two weeks
Further to the 24 April and 13 May 2025 announcements, East Star Resources Plc
(LSE:EST), which is exploring for copper and gold in Kazakhstan, is pleased to
announce the results of the induced polarisation ("IP") survey from the
Talovskoye high priority drill target area in East Kazakhstan.
This target area contains two distinct IP anomalies:
1. (Western Target) A large, deep, high chargeability anomaly reaching
amplitudes of up to 45mV/V. This anomaly is approximately 400 x 400m in size,
located approximately 100m below surface, and is open at depth
2. (Eastern Target) A small, narrow, near surface, high chargeability
anomaly associated with the historic Talovskoye Deposit. This response is open
to the north and shows potential to be associated with high-grade pipes,
similar to those mined in the past. The flanks and surface of the anomaly
contained historical drill results into unmined areas including:
· DH_5: 8.1m @ 1.0% Cu, 0.5% Pb and 0.5% Zn from 28.7m and 5.9m @ 0.6% Cu
and 3% Zn from 48.8m
· DH_6: 13m @ 0.75% Cu, 0.5% Pb and 0.1% Zn from surface
· DH_7: 4.3m @ 2.0% Cu, 0.2% Pb and 1.0% Zn from 52.9m
East Star has begun drilling preparation with the rig expected to mobilise to
the Rulikha and Talovskoye targets in the next two weeks.
Alex Walker, East Star CEO, commented:
"The Talovskoye target area is hosted within the Talovskaya suite, which is
the same geological unit that hosts the high-grade Irtyshsky mine (30Mt @ 2.2%
Cu, 5.1% Zn 0.7% Pb and 0.4 g/t Ag) 39km to the southeast, along the Irtysh
shear zone. The Eastern Target sits within the boundaries of the historic
mining operations and has mineralisation consistently reported in drill
results along the flanks and at the surface of the anomaly. The larger Western
Target anomaly shows both scale and shape, consistent with regional VMS
deposits with potential for a large depth extent. We look forward to drilling
the high impact Talovskoye and Rulikha targets in the coming weeks."
Figure 1 IP Survey over Talovskoye (110m depth slice) and the untested Western
Target (250m depth slice)
Next Steps
The East Star geological team will be on site within a week to site drill
collar locations and confirm access routes and logistics for both Talovskoye
and Rulikha.
The drill rig used in the Verkhuba Deposit drill programme in December 2024 is
currently located at the Verkhuba site. The drilling contractor has been
notified that East Star intends to drill the Rulikha and Talovskoye target
areas prior to recommencing work at Verkhuba. Mobilisation of the drill rig is
expected to commence in the next two weeks, with drilling to commence shortly
after.
Survey Details
The Talovskoye IP Survey was conducted as a 100m pole-dipole in an east-west
and then southwest to northeast line direction on 200m line spacing and a
1,300m line length at a frequency of 0.125Hz. Measurements were carried out in
a profile-based configuration using a three-electrode forward and reverse
setup (AMN-MNA), with simultaneous recording on 32 channels and electrode
spacing of 100 m.
Smart Geophysics from Kazakhstan conducted the survey using GDD GRx8-32
receivers and the GDD Tx4 transmitter. Quality control and interpretation were
conducted by Mitre Geophysics Pty Ltd, based in Australia.
East Star Resources Plc
Alex Walker, Chief Executive Officer
Tel: +44 (0)20 7390 0234 (via Vigo Consulting)
SI Capital (Corporate Broker)
Nick Emerson
Tel: +44 (0)1483 413 500
Vigo Consulting (Investor Relations)
Ben Simons / Peter Jacob
Tel: +44 (0)20 7390 0234
About East Star Resources Plc
East Star Resources is focused on the discovery and development of copper and
gold in Kazakhstan. East Star's management are based permanently on the
ground, supported by local expertise. The Company is pursuing three
exploration strategies:
· A Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide (VMS) discovery with a maiden JORC
MRE of 20.3Mt @ 1.16% copper, 1.54% zinc and 0.27% lead, in an
infrastructure-rich region, amenable to a low capex development
· Copper porphyry and epithermal gold exploration, with multiple
opportunities for Tier 1 deposits, initially supported by an initial US$500k
grant from BHP Xplor in 2024.
· Sediment-hosted copper exploration with Getech where the initial
targeting strategy is at no cost to East Star.
Visit our website:
www.eaststarplc.com (http://www.eaststarplc.com)
Follow us on social media:
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/east-star-resources/
(https://www.linkedin.com/company/east-star-resources/)
X (formerly Twitter): https://twitter.com/EastStar_PLC
(https://twitter.com/EastStar_PLC)
Subscribe to our email alert service to be notified whenever East Star
releases news:
www.eaststarplc.com/newsalerts (http://www.eaststarplc.com/newsalerts)
The person who arranged for the release of this announcement was Alex Walker,
CEO of the Company.
This announcement contains inside information for the purposes of Article 7 of
Regulation 2014/596/EU which is part of domestic UK law pursuant to the Market
Abuse (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations (SI 2019/310) ("UK MAR"). Upon the
publication of this announcement, this inside information (as defined in UK
MAR) is now considered to be in the public domain.
Competent Person Statement
Scientific or technical information in this disclosure related to exploration
was reviewed by Dr Tremain Woods, a full-time employee of Discovery Ventures
Kazakhstan Ltd, a 100% owned subsidiary of East Star Resources PLC. Dr Woods
is a member in good standing with the Geological Society of South Africa. He
has sufficient experience that is relevant to the commodity, style of
mineralisation or type of deposit under consideration and activity which he is
undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person under the JORC code (2012
Edition).
Table 2 - JORC Code, 2012 Edition
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling techniques · Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or · Samples were taken from diamond drill core through sulphide or
specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the oxide mineralised intervals.
minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF
instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad · Sampling intervals ranged from 0.1 m to over 1.0m
meaning of sampling.
· Sample quality was ensured by a GKZ standard calculations to
· Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity ensure results from X-ray spectral analyses were representative
and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.
· Core samples were prepared by the geological expeditions by
· Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to cutting the core in half, crushing and milling the samples (the size fractions
the Public Report. aren't recorded but noted as standard fractions), then analysed with X-ray
spectral techniques
· In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be
relatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m · No core is available for verification sampling
samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire
assay'). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there
is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of
detailed information.
Drilling techniques · Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary · Drilling was conducted using standard NQ sized diamond drilling
air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple technique
or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type,
whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). · Various drilling campaigns were conducted by geological
expeditions as detailed above
· The drill holes purpose ranged from geochemical sampling using
KGK techniques (these holes are not included in the data for this
announcement) to deeper stratigraphic holes. Only selected holes with assay
data through the Talovskoye deposit were included in this announcement
· It's unclear if the core was orientated
Drill sample recovery · Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and · Core recovery was an average of 42%, the total range was from 17
results assessed. - 66% recovery
· Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative · Recovery logs are unavailable for drill hole data base, so the
nature of the samples. relationship between recovery and grade has not been evaluated.
· Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and
whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.
Logging · Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and · Geologists from the various companies and expeditions completed
geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral logging
Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.
· The logging was approved by the committee for geology
· Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or
costean, channel, etc) photography. · Sections and plan maps were available to verify geology and
structure
· The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.
· East Star geologists were able to confirm the geology at surface
with geological mapping at a scale of 1:2000 in 2024
· No details of geotechnical logging were captured in the reports
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation · If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core · Half core samples were collected for processing
taken.
· Sub sampling techniques aren't clearly recorded in the reports
· If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and available
whether sampled wet or dry.
· For all sample types, the nature, quality, and appropriateness of the
sample preparation technique.
· Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to
maximise representivity of samples.
· Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the
in-situ material collected, including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
· Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the
material being sampled.
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests · The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and · The samples were analyzed using X-ray spectral analysis, which
laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or requires finely powdered, homogeneous samples to ensure accurate detection of
total. elements (Cu, Pb, Zn, Au and Ag).
· For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, · It's unclear if Au and Ag analyses were conducted on all samples
the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and analysed
model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.
· The preparation was tailored to produce a sample compatible with
· Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, the X-ray spectrometer, typically involving pressing the powdered sample into
duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of a pellet or fusing it into a glass bead for analysis, though the reports do
accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established. not specify these steps
· X-ray spectral techniques were commonly used in historical
exploration in the soviet era. The techniques have been subsequently replaced
by modern analytical techniques. However, they are generally viewed as having
produced accurate results. The quality of the data has only been evaluated as
reported historically by East Star geologists and have been represented as
such in this announcement
Verification of sampling and assaying · The verification of significant intersections by either independent · Sampling data has been compared between reports
or alternative company personnel.
· No verification sampling of the historical assays has been
· The use of twinned holes. conducted
· Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data
verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
· Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Location of data points · Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar · Drill hole location have not been confirmed, the hole locations
and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in are digitised from hand drawn sections and maps in historical reports
Mineral Resource estimation.
· The drill holes are evaluated against available SRTM topography
· Specification of the grid system used. (30 m accuracy)
· Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
Data spacing and distribution · Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. · Historical drilling for the Talovksoye deposit was spaced at less
than 100 m, drill hole spacing does not seem to be regular
· Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish
the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral · 16 holes were drilled in the vicinity of the Talovksoye deposit
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.
· Significant intercepts are reported for results only noted
· Whether sample compositing has been applied. potentially economic intercepts of copper, lead and zinc
· A historical resource for Talovksoye was completed in 1992, only
P1+P2 resources were declared. However, the lack of drilling was noted as a
limitation of the historical work and an additional 9,250 m of drilling was
recommended
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure · Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of · Drill holes seem randomly orientated, but generally towards the
possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the west. The volcaniclastic and volcanic lithologies seem to strike NW, dipping
deposit type. 70° to the W. Although this has not been verified by East Star
· If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the · It's unclear if any relationship exists between mineralisation ad
orientation of key mineralized structures is considered to have introduced a drilling orientation
sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.
Sample security · The measures taken to ensure sample security. · Not applicable
Audits or reviews · The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. · East Star resources has sampled the top of the Talovskoye
Deposit, the samples did prove the existence of mineralisation. However, no
physical materials were available to verify the drill results.
· East Star plans to further verify the Talovskoye Deposit which is
located close to the IP targets in future work programmes.
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status · Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including · The Talovksoye deposit is located in the eastern part of exploration
agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, license 1799-EL (the "License"). The license was issued to Rudny Resources
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, Limited on 28 July 2022 for initial period of 6 years with a possibility of
wilderness or national park and environmental settings. further five years extension subject to reduction of the license area by 40%
· The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with · East Star resources have servitude for exploration from the local
any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. Akim (administrative head), and local landholders, over some areas within the
Licence and the license can be explored under these agreements. Additional
agreements will be required for the Talovskoye deposit
· Some other areas within the Licence are restricted in access due to
hydrogeological constraints. Additional permission will be required to gain
access to drill within these areas. However, the IP survey was not conducted
on these areas
· There are no known legal or security impediments to obtaining a
mining license
Exploration done by other parties · Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. · Table of previously completed exploration
Principal author, year Period Exploration Results
1948 1948 Prospecting and exploration at Talovskoye and Openyshevskoye deposits by Identified polymetallic deposits in Rudny Altai, including early recognition
Priirtysh Geological Exploration Party. of Rulikha and Talovskoye potential.
1950-1954 1950-1953 Prospecting and exploration by Shemonaikha Party of Altai Expedition, focusing Confirmed polymetallic mineralization in the Rulikha area, establishing a
on geological mapping and initial drilling. foundation for further exploration.
1955-1963 1954-1962 Geological mapping, drilling, and reserve calculation by Shemonaikha GRP. Delineated Rulikha deposit's geological structure; reserves calculated as of
Consolidated report in 1957 calculated reserves for Rulikhinskoye. 01.01.1957, confirming VMS-polymetallic mineralization (Cu, Pb, Zn).
1968 1968 Geological structure and mineral resource assessment of M-44-57-B, G; Provided regional geological context, supporting Rulikha's placement within
M-44-58-A-v sheets. the Aleysk anticlinorium.
1965-1970 1965-1969 Geological prospecting by Shemonaikha GRP, including geophysical surveys and Refined geological and geophysical understanding of Rulikha, identifying
drilling. ore-hosting structures.
1971 1968-1971 Geological and geophysical work by Priirtyshskaya Party at Rulevsky site. Further delineated Rulikha's mineralization, confirming its association with
Talovskaya-Gerikhovskaya formation contact.
1979 1979 General prospecting at Buzanikhinsky area, adjacent to Rulikha. Identified additional mineralization potential near Rulikha, supporting
regional prospectivity.
1983 1978-1982 Detailed prospecting by Minsk GRP at Rulikhinsko-Vydrikhinsky area; drilling Confirmed extent of Rulikha mineralization, refined ore zone boundaries, and
and geophysical surveys. identified vein-type ores.
1983 1979-1983 Detailed prospecting by Ubin GRP at Talovsko-Rulevsky area, focusing on Positive assessment of Talovskoye; Rulikha flanks showed limited economic
Talovskoye and Rulikha flanks. potential but warranted further study.
1992 1989-1992 Deep drilling (6,785 m), geophysical logging (6,607 m gamma), 737 geochemical Negative assessment for Rulikha deep horizons (to 1000 m); vein-type ores in
samples, 16 core samples; X-ray spectral analysis for Cu, Pb, Zn, Co, Mo. borehole No. 323 (3.60-5.84% Zn) uneconomic. Talovskoye deemed promising with
P1/P2 resources, recommended for further drilling (9,250 m).
1948 1948 Prospecting and exploration at Talovskoye and Openyshevskoye deposits by Identified polymetallic deposits in Rudny Altai, including early recognition
Priirtysh Geological Exploration Party. of Rulikha and Talovskoye potential.
ESR 2024 Drilling of six verification and in-fill holes, topography survey, development MRE report
of lithological model
Geology · Deposit type, geological setting, and style of mineralisation. · Talovksoye is Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide (VMS) deposit. Historical
reports do not clarify the type of VMS deposit
· The mineralization at Talovskoye is lenticular massive and
disseminated sulphides hosted in volcaniclastic units sub horizontal units
· Mineralisation occurs as base metal rich units
· The area has seen post depositional deformation in the form of
folding and faulting
Drill hole Information · A summary of all information material to the understanding of the · Not applicable
exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for
all Material drill holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of
the drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.
· If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that
the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why
this is the case.
Data aggregation methods · In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, · Not applicable
maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and
cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.
· Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade
results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations
should be shown in detail.
· The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values
should be clearly stated.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths · These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of · Not applicable
Exploration Results.
· If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole
angle is known, its nature should be reported.
· If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there
should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. 'down hole length, true width
not known').
Diagrams · Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of · Relevant diagrams have been included in the body text
intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported
These should include but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
locations and appropriate sectional views.
Balanced reporting · Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not · Not applicable
practical, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths
should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.
Other substantive exploration data · Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be · The Measurements are carried out in a profile-based configuration
reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical using a three-electrode forward and reverse setup (AMN-MNA), with simultaneous
survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of recording on 32 channels. Electrode spacing of 50 m (1 line) and 100 m (10
treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical lines), according to technical specification
and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
· Two separate surveys were conducted - E-W orientated survey totalling
4.3 line kms and a NE-SW survey totalling 3.9 line kms. The NE-SW survey was
chosen as it is most likely perpendicular to the strike of theTalovskaya Suite
· The survey was completed using GDD Instrumentation (Canada). GDD Tx4
transmitter and GDD GRx8-32 receivers were used for the survey
· Results were verified by the Geophysical Contractor - Smart
Geophysics Limited. The results were sent to Mitre Geophysics for processing,
interpretation and modelling
Further work · The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral · East star is planning to model historical drill results at the nearby
extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). Talovskoye deposit
· Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, · East Star is planning a drill programme to test the chargeability
including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, anomalies
provided this information is not commercially sensitive.
Geology
· Deposit type, geological setting, and style of mineralisation.
· Talovksoye is Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide (VMS) deposit. Historical
reports do not clarify the type of VMS deposit
· The mineralization at Talovskoye is lenticular massive and
disseminated sulphides hosted in volcaniclastic units sub horizontal units
· Mineralisation occurs as base metal rich units
· The area has seen post depositional deformation in the form of
folding and faulting
Drill hole Information
· A summary of all information material to the understanding of the
exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for
all Material drill holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of
the drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.
· If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that
the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why
this is the case.
· Not applicable
Data aggregation methods
· In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques,
maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and
cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.
· Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade
results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations
should be shown in detail.
· The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values
should be clearly stated.
· Not applicable
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths
· These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of
Exploration Results.
· If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole
angle is known, its nature should be reported.
· If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there
should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. 'down hole length, true width
not known').
· Not applicable
Diagrams
· Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of
intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported
These should include but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
locations and appropriate sectional views.
· Relevant diagrams have been included in the body text
Balanced reporting
· Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not
practical, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths
should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.
· Not applicable
Other substantive exploration data
· Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be
reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical
survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical
and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
· The Measurements are carried out in a profile-based configuration
using a three-electrode forward and reverse setup (AMN-MNA), with simultaneous
recording on 32 channels. Electrode spacing of 50 m (1 line) and 100 m (10
lines), according to technical specification
· Two separate surveys were conducted - E-W orientated survey totalling
4.3 line kms and a NE-SW survey totalling 3.9 line kms. The NE-SW survey was
chosen as it is most likely perpendicular to the strike of theTalovskaya Suite
· The survey was completed using GDD Instrumentation (Canada). GDD Tx4
transmitter and GDD GRx8-32 receivers were used for the survey
· Results were verified by the Geophysical Contractor - Smart
Geophysics Limited. The results were sent to Mitre Geophysics for processing,
interpretation and modelling
Further work
· The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral
extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).
· Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions,
including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas,
provided this information is not commercially sensitive.
· East star is planning to model historical drill results at the nearby
Talovskoye deposit
· East Star is planning a drill programme to test the chargeability
anomalies
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
. END UPDZZGMKRDGGKZMRecent news on East Star Resources
See all newsREG - East Star Resources - Holding(s) in Company
AnnouncementREG - East Star Resources - Holding(s) in Company
AnnouncementREG - East Star Resources - Commenced Drilling in Kazakhstan East Region
AnnouncementREG - Official List - Official List Notice
AnnouncementREG - Stock Exch Notice - Admission to Trading - 13/06/2025
Announcement