Fitch Downgrades 14 Turkish Banks; Outlook Negative
(The following statement was released by the rating agency)
Link to Fitch Ratings' Report(s): Fitch Downgrades 14 Turkish Banks; Outlook
Negative
https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10083250
Fitch Ratings-London-July 19: Fitch Ratings has downgraded the support-driven
Long-Term Foreign Currency Issuer Default Ratings (LTFC IDRs) of 12
foreign-owned Turkish banks and their subsidiaries, and two state-owned
development banks, Turkiye Ihracat Kredi Bankasi A.S. (Turk Eximbank) and
Turkiye Kalkinma Bankasi A.S. (TKYB).
The agency has also downgraded the Long-Term Local Currency IDRs of 22 banks and
their subsidiaries. The Outlooks on all banks' Long-Term IDRs are Negative.
Viability Ratings (VRs) are not affected as a result of these rating actions. A
full list of rating actions is available at www.fitchratings.com or via the link
above.
The rating actions follow the downgrade of Turkey's sovereign rating on 12 July
2019 (see "Fitch Downgrades Turkey to 'BB-'; Outlook Negative" at
www.fitchratings.com). In Fitch's view, the dismissal of Turkey's central bank
governor heightens doubts about the authorities' tolerance for a period of
sustained below-trend growth and disinflation that Fitch considers consistent
with a rebalancing and stabilisation of the economy, and highlights a
deterioration in Turkey's institutional independence and economic policy
coherence and credibility.
The downgrades of the foreign-owned Turkish banks' LTFC IDRs to 'B+' from 'BB-'
reflects increased risk of government intervention in the banking sector in case
of a marked deterioration in Turkey's external finances. We continue to view the
risk of intervention that would prevent banks from servicing their FC
obligations to be slightly higher than that of a sovereign default, and this
result in these ratings being capped one notch below the sovereign LTFC IDR.
The one-notch downgrades of the support-driven LTFC IDRs of state-owned
development banks TKYB, to 'BB-', and Turk Eximbank, to 'B+', reflect Fitch's
view of the increased risks to the ability of the Turkish authorities to provide
timely and sufficient support in foreign currency (FC) given the increased
potential for stress in the country's external finances. Turk Eximbank is rated
one notch below Turkey, while TKYB is equalised with the sovereign rating due to
its small size and high, albeit reduced, proportion of Turkish
treasury-guaranteed funding.
The VRs of all banks under review, and of other Fitch-rated Turkish banks, are
unaffected following the sovereign downgrade. This reflects our view that VRs
are already in the 'b' category and therefore capture higher systemic risk: the
highest Turkish bank VRs of 'b+' are still one notch below the sovereign
ratings.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
IDRS, SUPPORT RATINGS AND SENIOR DEBT RATINGS OF FOREIGN-OWNED BANKS
Turkiye Garanti Bankasi A.S. (Garanti BBVA; LTFC IDR B+/Negative)
Yapi ve Kredi Bankasi A.S. (YKB; LTFC IDR B+/Negative)
Turk Ekonomi Bankasi (TEB; LTFC IDR B+/Negative)
QNB Finansbank A.S. (LTFC IDR B+/Negative)
ING Bank A.S. (LTFC IDR B+/Negative)
Kuveyt Turk Katilim Bankasi (Kuveyt Turk; LTFC IDR B+/Negative)
Alternatifbank A.S. (Alternatifbank; LTFC IDR B+/Negative)
Turkiye Finans Katilim Bankasi (TFKB; LTFC IDR B+/Negative)
Burgan Bank A.S. (Burgan Bank Turkey; LTFC IDR B+/Negative)
ICBC Turkey Bank A.S. (LTFC IDR B+/Negative)
BankPozitif Kredi ve Kalkinma Bankasi (BankPozitif; LTFC IDR B+/Negative)
Denizbank A.S. (LTFC IDR B+/Negative)
The foreign-owned banks' LTFC IDRs and FC senior debt ratings are downgraded by
one notch to 'B+', one notch below the sovereign LTFC IDR. This reflects our
view that in case of a marked deterioration in Turkey's external finances, the
risk of government intervention in the banking sector would be higher than that
of a sovereign default.
In Fitch's view, Turkey's high external funding requirement creates a
significant incentive to retain market access and avoid capital controls.
Nevertheless, if there were a marked deterioration in Turkey's external finances
some form of intervention in the banking system that might impede the banks'
ability to service their FC obligations would become more likely, in Fitch's
view.
Nine foreign-owned banks now have FC IDRs and FC senior debt ratings at the
level of their VRs, but also underpinned by shareholder support. The FC IDRs of
Alternatifbank, Burgan Bank Turkey and BankPozitif remain driven solely by
shareholder support. Fitch's view of support for all foreign-owned banks is
based on their strategic importance, to varying degrees, for their parents,
integration, roles within their respective groups and, for some, common
branding.
All foreign-owned banks' LT LC IDRs are also downgraded by one notch. Their LT
LC IDRs are one notch above their LTFC IDRs, reflecting our view of a lower
likelihood of government intervention that would impede the banks' ability to
service obligations in local currency.
IDRs, SUPPORT RATINGS AND SENIOR DEBT RATINGS OF STATE-OWNED COMMERCIAL BANKS
AND DEVELOPMENT BANKS
T.C. Ziraat Bankasi A.S. (Ziraat; LTFC IDR B+/Negative)
Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. (Halk; LTFC IDR B+ /Negative)
Turkiye Vakiflar Bankasi A.S. (Vakifbank; LTFC IDR B+ /Negative)
Vakif Katilim Bankasi A.S. (Vakif Katilim; LTFC IDR B+/Negative)
Turkiye Sinai Kalkinma Bankasi A.S. (TSKB; LTFC IDR B+/Negative)
Turkiye Ihracat Kredi Bankasi A.S. (Turk Eximbank; LTFC IDR B+ /Negative)
Turkiye Kalkinma ve Yatirim Bankasi A.S. (TKYB; LTFC IDR BB-/Negative)
TKYB's LTFC IDR has been downgraded by one notch to 'BB-' from 'BB'. The bank's
ratings remain equalised with the sovereign, reflecting its small size and still
largely treasury-guaranteed funding base.
Turk Eximbank's LTFC IDR has also been downgraded by one notch, to 'B+' from
'BB-'. The bank's ratings reflect Fitch's view of the high propensity of the
government to provide support given Turk Eximbank's ownership, policy role and
high level of state-related funding. However, Turk Eximbank is rated one notch
below the sovereign due to its larger (than TKYB) balance sheet and volumes of
foreign funding and risks to the ability of the authorities to provide support
in FC.
The Support Rating Floors (SRFs) of the state-owned commercial banks (Ziraat,
Vakifbank, Halk, Vakif Katilim), and of privately owned development bank TSKB,
have been affirmed at 'B+' despite the sovereign downgrade.
This reflects a degree of rating compression at lower rating levels, and also
considers the high government propensity to support these banks given their
majority state ownership (except for TSKB), systemic importance (Ziraat,
Vakifbank, Halk), policy roles (Ziraat, Halk, TSKB), significant state-related
funding, state guarantees in the case of TSKB, and the recent record of support.
The one-notch difference between the sovereign rating and those of these banks
reflects the limited ability of the authorities to provide support in FC.
The authorities have shown a strong commitment to support the state banks, as
indicated by capital increases in September 2018 and April 2019.
The LTFC IDRs of Halk and Vakif Katilim have been affirmed following the
affirmation of their SRFs, which drive their LTFC IDRs.
The LTLC IDRs of the state-owned commercial banks and the development banks have
been downgraded to 'BB-' and are equalised with the sovereign rating, reflecting
the stronger ability of the sovereign to provide support in LC.
The Negative Outlooks on the banks' Long-Term IDRs mirror those on the sovereign
ratings. For Ziraat, Vakifbank and TSKB, which have VRs at the level of their
SRFs, the Outlooks on the LTFC IDRs also reflect the potential for their VRs to
be downgraded if there were further deterioration in the operating environment
or increases in risk appetite that place greater-than-expected pressure on
financial metrics (Ziraat and Vakifbank only) .
LONG-TERM LOCAL CURRENCY IDRS AND SUPPORT RATING FLOORS OF AKBANK AND ISBANK
Akbank TAS (LTFC IDR 'B+'/Negative)
Turkiye Is Bankasi (LTFC IDR 'B+'/Negative)
The LTLC IDRs of Akbank and Isbank have been downgraded to 'B+' from 'BB-' and
are now in line with their LTFC IDRs. The LTLC IDRs are underpinned by potential
state support and the downgrades reflect the sovereign downgrade.
Both the banks' LTLC IDRs and LTFC IDRs are now in line with their VRs. The
Negative Outlooks on their IDRs reflect the potential for further deterioration
in the operating environment, which could place greater pressure on the banks'
financial metrics.
The affirmation of the 'B' SRFs of Akbank and Isbank, two notches below the
sovereign LTFC IDR (at the level of the domestic systemically important bank
(D-SIB) SRF for Turkish banks), reflects their systemic importance, but also
their private ownership and the Turkish authorities' limited ability to provide
support in FC, if needed.
SUBORDINATED DEBT RATINGS
The subordinated notes ratings of YKB, Kuveyt Turk, Garanti and Alternatifbank
are notched down once from their IDRs and have been downgraded by one notch in
line with the downgrades of their anchor ratings. The notching in each case
includes one notch for loss severity and zero notches for non-performance risk
(relative to the anchor ratings).
SUBSIDIARY RATINGS
Ak Yatirim (LTFC IDR 'B+' /Negative)
Ak Finansal Kiralama (LTFC IDR 'B+' /Negative)
Alternatif Finansal Kiralama AS (LTFC IDR 'B+'/Negative)
Deniz Finansal Kiralama (LTFC IDR 'B+'/Negative)
Joint-Stock Company Denizbank Moscow (LTFC IDR 'B+'/Negative)
Garanti Faktoring (LTFC IDR 'B+'/Negative)
Garanti Finansal Kiralama (LTFC IDR 'B+'/Negative)
Is Finansal Kiralama (LTFC IDR 'B+'/Negative)
QNB Finans Finansal Kiralama A.S. (LTFC IDR 'B+'/ Negative)
Yapi Kredi Finansal Kiralama (LTFC IDR 'B+'/ Negative)
Yapi Kredi Faktoring (LTFC IDR 'B+'/ Negative)
Yapi Kredi Yatirim Menkul Degerler (LTFC IDR 'B+'/Negative)
Ziraat Katilim Bankasi (LTFC IDR 'B+' /Negative)
Subsidiary ratings are equalised with those of parent banks, reflecting their
strategic importance to, and integration within, their respective groups. The
downgrades of the LT IDRs of the subsidiaries of foreign-owned banks
(Alternatifbank, Denizbank, Garanti, QNB Finansbank and YKB), and of the LTLC
IDRs of the subsidiaries of Akbank, Isbank and Ziraat, mirror the rating actions
on their respective parents.
RATING SENSITIVITIES
FOREIGN-OWNED BANKS
The LT IDRs, Support Ratings and senior debt ratings of foreign-owned banks
could be downgraded if Fitch believes the risk of government intervention in the
banking sector has increased materially. The Negative Outlooks on these banks
reflect the potential for a further deterioration in Turkey's external finances,
which could increase the risk of such intervention. A sovereign downgrade would
be likely to lead to downgrades of these banks.
STATE-OWNED COMMERCIAL AND DEVELOPMENT BANKS
The IDRs and senior debt ratings of Ziraat, Halk, Vakifbank, Vakif Katilim,
TSKB, Turk Eximbank and TKYB could be downgraded if Fitch concludes that the
ability of the sovereign to provide support has weakened. However, the ratings
of Ziraat, Vakifbank and TSKB would only be downgraded if their 'b+' VRs were
also lowered.
AKBANK AND ISBANK
The LTFC IDRs and senior debt ratings of Akbank and Isbank are sensitive to any
changes to their VRs. The banks' LTLC IDRs are underpinned by state support at
the 'B+' level, and so would only be downgraded if both our assessment of
support weakened and the VRs were downgraded.
SUBORDINATED DEBT RATINGS
Subordinated debt ratings are primarily sensitive to changes in banks' anchor
ratings, namely the Long-Term IDRs for YKB, Garanti, Kuveyt Turk and
Alternatifbank.
These ratings are also sensitive to a change in notching from the anchor ratings
due to a revision in Fitch's assessment of the probability of the notes'
non-performance risk or of loss severity in case of non-performance.
SUBSIDIARY RATINGS
The ratings of these entities are sensitive to changes in the Long-Term IDRs of
their parents.
Contact:
For the respective analytical contacts, see the associated Rating Action Report.
Committee Chairperson
Mahin Dissanayake
Senior Director
+44 20 3530 1618
Media Relations: Louisa Williams, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 2452, Email:
louisa.williams@thefitchgroup.com.
Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com
Applicable Criteria
Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 12 Oct 2018)
https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10044408
Non-Bank Financial Institutions Rating Criteria (pub. 12 Oct 2018)
https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10044407
Short-Term Ratings Criteria (pub. 02 May 2019)
https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10073011
Additional Disclosures
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
https://www.fitchratings.com/site/dodd-frank-disclosure/10083196
Solicitation Status
https://www.fitchratings.com/site/pr/10083196#solicitation
Endorsement Policy
https://www.fitchratings.com/regulatory
ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS.
PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK:
HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING
DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S
PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND
METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF
CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE,
AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF
CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE
AVAILABLE AT HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/SITE/REGULATORY. FITCH MAY HAVE
PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD
PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED
IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS
ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.
Copyright © 2019 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its
subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824,
(212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or
in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and
maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast
information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and
underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch
conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it
in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification
of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are
available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's
factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains
will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the
requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is
offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of
relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its
advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as
audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports,
engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties,
the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources
with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the
issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports
should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any
third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on
in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete.
Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the
information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and
other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the
work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial
statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings
and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking
and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature
cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current
facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that
were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or
warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or
any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the
report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security.
This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and
methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore,
ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual,
or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The
rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk,
unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or
sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals
identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible
for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes
only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute
for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer
and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be
changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch.
Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a
recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the
adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular
investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to
any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other
obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from
US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In
certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular
issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a
single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000
(or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or
dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to
use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed
under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act
of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular
jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and
distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to
three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd
holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which
authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit
ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who
are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001
Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the
"NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on
Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on
behalf of the NRSRO (see https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory), other
credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and
therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf
of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit
ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO