Picture of Hummingbird Resources logo

HUM Hummingbird Resources News Story

0.000.00%
gb flag iconLast trade - 00:00
Basic MaterialsHighly SpeculativeSmall CapValue Trap

REG - Hummingbird Res. - Dugbe Gold Project Feasibility Study Results

For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
http://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20220613:nRSM7064Oa&default-theme=true

RNS Number : 7064O  Hummingbird Resources PLC  13 June 2022

Hummingbird Resources plc / Ticker: HUM / Index: AIM / Sector: Mining

13 June 2022

 Hummingbird Resources plc

("Hummingbird" or the "Company")

Dugbe Gold Project Feasibility Study Results

Pre-Tax NPV5% of US$690 million, Pre-Tax IRR of 26.35% & AISC of
US$1,005/oz over a 14-year LOM

Hummingbird Resources plc (AIM: HUM) is pleased to announce that Pasofino
Gold Ltd ("Pasofino") (TSXV: VEIN) has released the results of the Dugbe Gold
Project Feasibility Study ("FS"), which is located in Southern Liberia. The FS
was prepared by Pasofino's lead engineers, DRA Global (South Africa), in
accordance with Canadian Securities Administrators' National Instrument
43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101").

For the full Pasofino release details and graphics, please follow the link
here
(https://www.pasofinogold.com/news/news-details/2022/Pasofino-Gold-Announces-Feasibility-Study-Results-for-the-Dugbe-Gold-Open-Pit-Project-in-Liberia/default.aspx)
.

Highlights:

·      Strong financial metrics

o  Pre-tax NPV5% of US$690 million ("M") (US$530M post-tax), 26.35% IRR
(23.6% post-tax) at a base gold price of US$1,700 ounce ("oz").

·      Fast capital payback of approximately 3.5 years from start of
production

o  Life of mine ("LOM") All In Sustaining Cost ("AISC") of US$1,005/oz and
US$29/t cash cost(( 1  (#_ftn1) )) .

o  Pre-production capital requirement of US$397M excluding owners' costs for
a 5Mtpa processing plant.

·      Large Mineral Reserve with potential for expansion

o  2.27Moz gold produced over a 14-year LOM.

o  Average annual production of 200,000oz for the first five years.

o  2.76Moz of Mineral Reserves.

o  Additional 67 thousand oz ("koz") of Inferred Mineral Resources within the
FS pit and immediate sidewalls, which have not been included in the Mineral
Reserves.

·      Simple project with economies of scale

o  LOM strip ratio of 4.21:1, highlighted by a low 3.56:1 ratio in the first
five years.

o  Simple (Gravity-CIL) process flow sheet, which enhances project economics.

o  Low power costs of US$0.175/kWh, with opportunities for long-term savings
with alternative renewable energy sources.

·      ESG

o  Environmental and social impact assessment ("ESIA") process nearing
completion, with submission to the EPA expected in June 2022.

·      Infrastructure-Ready Project

o  Only 76km by road from the Port of Greenville to the Dugbe Project, which
was repaired and improved as part of the FS process.

o  All build and operational cargo to be transported through the operating
Port of Greenville.

o  Government supported berthing rights at the Port of Greenville for the
Project.

o  Tuzon and Dugbe F deposits are 4km apart, serviced by a central processing
plant.

o  LNG power generation hybridised with solar PV power generation to produce
an estimated    levelised cost of energy of US$ 175.10/MWh.

Dan Betts, CEO of Hummingbird Resources, commented:

"We are delighted to receive the results from the robust FS that has been
conducted by Pasofino. The FS has been conducted to a high standard and has
seen a complete remodelling of the Resource base, to now showcase a
significant 2.76Moz Reserve base, long LOM of 14 years with upside given the
material exploration potential available and a low AISC profile of USD1,005/oz
to underpin a gold mine of material value. We look forward to now working with
Pasofino to conduct a strategic review of our options to best realise the
maximum value of Dugbe for all stakeholders."

 

Pasofino Earn-In Update

Pursuant to NI 43-101, the FS will be filed by Pasofino at www.sedar.com
(http://www.sedar.com) within 45 days of this news release. Subject to the
filing by Pasofino of the FS under Pasofino's profile at www.sedar.com
(http://www.sedar.com) , and final administrative documentation, Hummingbird
has confirmed that the FS has been carried out to the agreed standards and
will satisfy the technical requirements to allow Pasofino to earn its 49%
economic interest in the Project (prior to the issuance of the Government
of Liberia's 10% carried interest). Further, both Pasofino and Hummingbird
will have the right to exercise the option to consolidate ownership by
converting Hummingbird's 51% ownership of the Project for a 51% shareholding
in Pasofino, such that Pasofino would own 100% of the Project (prior to the
government of Liberia's 10% carried interest), subject to the receipt of all
required approvals including the TSX Venture Exchange.

Mineral Resource Statement

Reasonable Prospects for Eventual Economic Extraction

For both deposits, reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction were
established based on open pit mining satisfied by means of a conceptual pit
shell. All blocks outside the pits were excluded from the Mineral Resource
Estimate. Key parameters used for the pit shells were: Gold price of
US$1700/oz Au, overall slope angle of 55 degrees, dilution of 10%, recovery of
90%, mining costs of US$1.93 per tonne for waste and US$ 2.24 and US$ 2.84
per tonne for Tuzon and Dugbe F respecti

Combined Mineral Resource Estimate Statement

The combined statement for both deposits is provided in Table 1 subdivided
using a 0.5g/t Au grade category and reported above a lower 'marginal' cut-off
grade. Within the 0.5 g/t Au grade category, the Measured and Indicated
tonnage is 75.2Mt grading 1.37g/t Au containing 3.31Moz gold plus an Inferred
tonnage of 14.9Mt at 1.23g/t Au containing 588 thousand ounces ("koz") gold.
Although not shown as a grade category in Table 1, above a 1.0g/t Au cut-off,
the combined Measured and Indicated part of the MRE is 2.88Moz of gold
contained in 56.6 million tonnes ("Mt") grading 1.58 grams per tonne ("g/t"),
mostly hosted within the HG domain at Tuzon.

Table 1. Mineral Resource Estimate effective 17 November 2021

                                                                                                           Classification  Tonnage (Mt)  Grade (Au g/t)  Contained Gold (koz)
 Subtotal above 0.5 g/t Au                                                       Tuzon deposit             Measured        -             -               -
                                                                                 Indicated                                 53.2          1.40            2,396
                                                                                 Measured & Indicated                      53.2          1.40            2,396
                                                                                 Inferred                                  7.5           1.13            270

                                                                                 Dugbe F deposit           Measured        1.2           1.44            56
                                                                                 Indicated                 20.8            1.28          860
                                                                                 Measured & Indicated      22.1            1.29          916
                                                                                 Inferred                  7.4             1.34          317

                                                                                 Subtotal                  Measured        1.2           1.44            56
                                                                                 Indicated                 74.0            1.37          3,256
                                                                                 Measured & Indicated      75.2            1.37          3,312
                                                                                 Inferred                  14.9            1.23          588
 Subtotal MRE for material between the  marginal cut-off grade and 0.5 g/t Au    Tuzon deposit             Measured        -             -               -
                                                                                 Indicated                                 5.8           0.43            81
                                                                                 Measured & Indicated                      5.8           0.43            81
                                                                                 Inferred                                  2.0           0.44            29

                                                                                 Dugbe F deposit           Measured        -             -               -
                                                                                 Indicated                 0.2             0.45          3
                                                                                 Measured & Indicated      0.2             0.45          3
                                                                                 Inferred                  0.01            0.44          0.2

                                                                                 Subtotal                  Measured        -             -               -
                                                                                 Indicated                 6.0             0.43          84
                                                                                 Measured & Indicated      6.0             0.43          84
                                                                                 Inferred                  2.1             0.44          29
 Total MRE - the above subtotals combined                                        Tuzon deposit             Measured
                                                                                 Indicated                                 59.0          1.31            2,477
                                                                                 Measured + Indicated                      59.0          1.31            2,477
                                                                                 Inferred                                  9.5           0.98            300

                                                                                 Dugbe F deposit           Measured        1.2           1.44            56
                                                                                 Indicated                 21.0            1.28          863
                                                                                 Measured + Indicated      22.2            1.29          919
                                                                                 Inferred                  7.40            1.33          318

                                                                                 TOTAL                     Measured        1.2           1.44            56
                                                                                 Indicated                 80.0            1.30          3,340
                                                                                 Measured + Indicated      81.2            1.30          3,396
                                                                                 Inferred                  16.9            1.13          617

Notes:

1.   The effective date of the Mineral Resource Estimate is 17 November
2021.

2.   The marginal cut-off grades for Tuzon are 0.34g/t Au for fresh material
and 0.39g/t Au for weathered material. The marginal cut-off grades for Dugbe F
are 0.36g/t Au for fresh material and 0.40g/t Au for weathered material.

3.   Rounding errors may be evident when combining totals in the table but
are immaterial.

4.   The Qualified Person is Mr. Martin Pittuck (CEng, MIMMM).

5.   The Mineral Resource has been classified under the guidelines of the
Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) and undertaken
within the context of the Canadian Securities Administrators' National
Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101).

6.   Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and have no demonstrated
economic viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially
affected by environmental, permitting, legal, marketing or other relevant
issues.

7.   Mineral Resource estimates are stated within conceptual pit shells that
have been used to define Reasonable Prospects for Eventual Economic Extraction
(RPEEE). The pit shells used the following main parameters: (i) Au price of
US$1700/ounce; (ii) plant recovery of 90%; and (iii) mean specific gravity of
2.78t/m(3) for mineralised gneiss and 2.64t/m‑(3) for pegmatite in fresh
rock and 2.1t/m(3) for oxide material.

Mineral Reserve Estimate

The Mineral Reserve Estimate (MRev) has been prepared as part of the Dugbe FS
completed by DRA, using the CIM definitions and guidelines adopted in May 2014
(CIM, 2014) and procedures for classifying the reported Mineral Reserves were
undertaken within the context of the Canadian Securities Administrators'
National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101")-Table 2.

The Mineral Reserves were derived from the MREs and the block models presented
in the Mineral Resource section. The Mineral Reserves are based on the
Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources that have been identified as being
economically extractable and which incorporate mining losses and dilution. A
summary of the Mineral Reserves by deposit is shown in the table below.

Though not considered for the Mineral Reserve Estimate there are Inferred
Mineral Resources within the FS pit and in immediate proximity to it. This
material comprises 1.7 Mt at an average grade of 1.25 g/t Au containing
67 koz and may be converted to Indicated Mineral Resources with a relatively
small number of additional drillholes. If this is realised, they may then
contribute additional material to future Mineral Reserve Estimates.

Table 2. Mineral Reserve Estimate effective 1 May 2022

                                                              Classification  Tonnage (Mt)  Grade (Au g/t)  Contained Gold (koz)
 Total Mineral Reserve above 0.5g/t cut-off  Tuzon deposit    Proven
                                             Probable                         48            1.35            2,087
                                             Subtotal                         48            1.35            2,087

                                             Dugbe F deposit  Proven          1             1.34            45
                                             Probable         17              1.15          629
                                             Subtotal         18              1.16          674

                                                              Proven          1             1.34            45
                                             Probable         65              1.29          2,716
                                             TOTAL            66              1.30          2,760

Notes:

8.   The effective date of the Mineral Reserve is 1 May
2022.

9.   Mineral Reserves are defined within pit designs guided by pit shells.

10.  Mineral Reserves are reported at 0.50g/t cut-off grade and a metal price
of US$1,600/oz Au.

11.  Figures are rounded to the appropriate level of precision for the
reporting of Mineral Reserves. Due to rounding some columns or rows may not
compute as shown.

12.  The Mineral Reserves are stated as diluted dry metric tonnes. Estimated
dilution applied to Dugbe F is 10.1% and Tuzon 6.9%, while estimated losses
were 6.3% for Dugbe F and 5.0% for Tuzon.

13.  The Qualified Person is Mr Frikkie Fourie (B.Eng, Pr.Eng, MSAIMM).

14.  The Mineral Reserves have been classified under the guidelines of the
Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) .

Capital Cost Estimate

The project capital has been derived predominantly from tendered costs and
rates from the market, as well as relevant database costs from recent
projects, and is summarised in Table 3. Capital is within the accuracy of a
Class 3 Association of the Advancement of Cost Engineering ("AACE") estimate
of (+20 %/-15%).

Table 3. Capital Summary

 DIRECT                             TOTAL US$ M
 Process Plant                      129
 Process Plant Infrastructure       37
 General Site Infrastructure        77
 Tailings Storage Facility          19
 Access Road                        36
 Port Infrastructure                8
 Mining                             22
 Sub-Total:  Base Estimate Cost     326
 INDIRECT
 General Indirect Costs             71
 SUB TOTAL: PRE PRODUCTION CAPITAL   397

 OWNER'S COST
 Owner's Cost                       37
 TOTAL COST                         435

Note: Rounding may cause totals to differ.

Operating Cost Estimate

The operating costs over life of Project include mine operations, process
plant, TSF and general and administrative ("G&A") costs. Total LoM average
operational costs are estimated to be approximately US$154 million per annum
equivalent to a unit rate of US$29.47t RoM. An overview of operational costs
is presented in Table 4.

Table 4. LOM operating expenditure (columns may not add up due to rounding)

 DESCRIPTION            LOM (US$ M)  LOM (US$/t)
 Processing (Incl TSF)  700          10.71
 Mining                 764          11.52
 G&A                    100          1.51
 Other                  378          5.71
 TOTAL                  1,953        29.47

Economic Outcomes

Table 5 summarises the robust economics for the Project resulting from
detailed engineering across all disciplines.

Table 5. Economic outcomes summary

 DESCRIPTION                       UNITS     VALUE

 Production LoM                    years     14
 Production LoM                    months    159
 Total Ore Tonnes                  M tonnes  66.27
 Total Au Ounces Recovered         M Oz      2.27
 LoP Average
       Throughput                  t/a       5.00
        Au Grade                   g/t       1.30
        Au Recovery                %         83.01
        Au Ounces Recovered        Oz/a      171,594
 Initial Capital Cost              M US$     435
 SIB Capital Cost                  M US$     98
 Operating Cost
    LoP Average                    M US$/a   147
    LoP Unit Cost                  US$/t     29

 NPV                               M US$     690
 IRR                               %         26.35
 Payback Period (undiscounted)     years     3.3
 AISC                              US$/Oz    1,005
 AISC per ton                      US$/t     34

 NPV                               M US$     530
 IRR                               %         23.6
 Payback Period (undiscounted)     years     3.3
 AISC                              US$/Oz    1,005
 AISC per ton                      US$/t     34

Qualified Persons Statement

Scientific or technical information in this disclosure (other than information
that relates to mining, processing and related infrastructure results) was
reviewed by Mr Martin Pittuck, a full-time employee of SRK Consulting UK Ltd.
Mr Pittuck is a member in good standing with the Institute of Materials,
Minerals and Mining, a Fellow of the Geological Society of London and is a
Chartered Engineer; he has sufficient experience that is relevant to the
commodity, style of mineralisation under consideration and activity which he
is undertaking to qualify as a Qualified Person under National Instrument
43-101.

Scientific or technical information in this disclosure that relates to
processing and related infrastructure results was reviewed by Mr Robin Welsh,
a full-time employee of DRA Global. Mr Welsh is a Professional Engineer in
good standing with the Engineering Council of South Africa and has sufficient
experience that is relevant to the project under consideration which he is
undertaking to qualify as a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101.

Scientific or technical information in this disclosure that relates to
metallurgy and processing results was reviewed by Mr Marius Phillips, a
full-time employee of DRA Global. Mr Phillips is a Chartered Professional
Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining & Metallurgy and has
sufficient experience that is relevant to the project under consideration
which he is undertaking to qualify as a Qualified Person under National
Instrument 43-101.

Scientific or technical information in this disclosure that relates to mining
results was reviewed by Mr Frikkie Fourie, an independent consultant for DRA
Global. Mr Fourie is a Professional Engineer in good standing with the
Engineering Council of South Africa, is a Member of the South African
Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and has sufficient experience that is
relevant to the project under consideration which he is undertaking to qualify
as a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101.

Scientific or technical information in this disclosure that relates to
tailings storage facility results was reviewed by Mr Guy Wiid, a permanent
employee for Epoch Resources. Mr Wiid is a Professional Engineer in good
standing with the Engineering Council of South Africa, and a Chartered
Engineering good standing with the American Society of Civil Engineers and has
sufficient experience that is relevant to the project under consideration
which he is undertaking to qualify as a Qualified Person under National
Instrument 43-101.

Scientific or technical information in this disclosure that relates to
environmental, social and governance results was reviewed by Ms Fiona
Cessford-Le Roux, a full-time employee of SRK UK. Ms Cessford-Le Roux is a
Chartered Environmentalist in good standing with and a fellow of the
Institute of Materials, Minerals & Mining of the United Kingdom She has
sufficient experience which is relevant to the project under consideration
which she is undertaking to qualify as a Qualified Person under National
Instrument 43-101.

Scientific or technical information in this disclosure that relates to
financial results was reviewed by Mr Juan Kotzee, an independent consultant
for DRA Global. Mr Kotzee is a Financial Accountant, and has sufficient
experience that is relevant to the project under consideration which he is
undertaking to qualify as a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101.

Noris Del Bel Belluz, Group Technical Services Manager for the Hummingbird,
and is a qualified person, according to the Australasian Code for Reporting of
Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves ("JORC Code, 2012
Edition") and "Qualified Person" as defined by Part 1 of NI 43-101 Standards
of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (30 June, 2011 Edition).

About The Dugbe Gold Project

The 2,559 km(2) Dugbe Gold Project is in southern Liberia and situated within
the southwestern corner of the Birimian Supergroup which is host to the
majority of West African gold deposits. To date, two deposits have been
identified on the Project; Dugbe F and Tuzon discovered by Hummingbird in 2009
and 2011 respectively. The deposits are located within 4 km of the Dugbe Shear
Zone which is thought to have played a role in large scale gold mineralization
in the area.

A large amount of exploration in the area was conducted by Hummingbird up
until 2012 including 74,497 m of diamond coring. Pasofino drilled an
additional 14,584 metres at Tuzon and Dugbe during 2021. Both deposits have
Mineral Resource Estimates dated 17 November 2021. Following the completion of
the Definitive Feasibility Study in June 2022 a Mineral Reserve Estimate was
declared, based on the open-pit mining of both deposits over a 14-year Life of
Mine.

In addition, there are many gold prospects within the Project including the
Bukon Jedeh area acquired in late 2020. Here artisanal mining has extracted
gold since the 1930's and includes currently active open pits over 20 m deep
working fresh bedrock. At the DSZ target on the Tuzon-Sackor trend Pasofino
has discovered a broad zone of surface gold mineralisation in trench and
outcrop along strike from Tuzon. At this and several of the other prospects no
drilling has been carried out to date.

In 2019, Hummingbird signed a 25-year Mineral Development Agreement ("MDA")
with the Government of Liberia providing the necessary long-term framework and
stabilisation of taxes and duties. Under the terms of the MDA, the royalty
rate on gold production is 3%, the income tax rate payable is 25% (with credit
given for historic exploration expenditures), the fuel duty is reduced by 50%,
and the Government of Liberia is granted a free carried interest of 10% in the
Project.

For further information, please visit  www.hummingbirdresources.co.uk
(http://www.hummingbirdresources.co.uk/)   or contact:

 Daniel Betts, CEO                  Hummingbird Resources plc  Tel: +44 (0) 20 7409 6660

 Thomas Hill, FD

 Edward Montgomery, CSO & ESG
 James Spinney                      Strand Hanson Limited      Tel: +44 (0) 20 7409 3494

 Ritchie Balmer                     Nominated Adviser
 James Asensio                      Canaccord Genuity Limited  Tel: +44 (0) 20 7523 8000

 Thomas Diehl                       Broker
 Bobby Morse                        Buchanan                   Tel: +44 (0) 20 7466 5000

 Ariadna Peretz                     Financial PR/IR            Email: HUM@buchanan.uk.com

 James Husband

 

 

Notes to Editors:

Hummingbird Resources  (AIM: HUM) is a leading multi-asset,
multi-jurisdiction gold production, development and exploration Company and
member of the  World Gold Council  ("WGC"). Hummingbird's vision is to
continue to grow its asset base, producing profitable ounces, while continuing
to focus on its Environmental, Social & Governance ("ESG") policies and
practices.  The Company currently has two core gold projects, the
producing Yanfolila Gold Mine in  Mali, and the Kouroussa gold development
project in  Guinea .  Further, the Company has a controlling interest in
the Dugbe Gold Project in Liberia that is being developed by Pasofino Gold
Limited through an earn-in agreement.

 

(( 1  (#_ftnref1) )) Cash costs per payable ounce and AISC per payable ounce
are non-IFRS financial measures. Please see "Cautionary Note Regarding
Non-IFRS Measures". AISC per payable ounce includes all mining costs,
processing costs, mine level G&A, royalties, sustaining capital and
closure costs. Cash costs per payable ounce includes all mining costs,
processing costs, mine level G&A and royalties.

This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
 or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.

RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
.   END  MSCFJMATMTIBBBT

Recent news on Hummingbird Resources

See all news