By Arriana McLymore and Greg Bensinger
Feb 5 (Reuters) - Amazon.com AMZN.O has begun rolling
out a new artificial intelligence assistant that is meant to
address shoppers’ product questions, but the feature raises as
many questions as it answers.
Rufus, as the software is known, will help users, according
to Amazon, by guiding them to the toaster ovens or dinosaur toys
that best fit their needs. Yet Amazon has a history of steering
customers towards products that most benefit Amazon, either
because they are more profitable or are backed by advertising
dollars.
Amazon is combating an antitrust lawsuit by the Federal
Trade Commission which alleges the Seattle firm operates a
“pay-to-play” system, giving top billing for the products on
which marketers were willing to spend the most. And the agency
noted that Amazon frequently pushes its private-label brands to
the top of search results, even when other goods may be higher
quality or at a better price. The company has denied the claims
and said it will contest the suit in court.
Like for other generative AI services, the algorithm behind
Rufus is a closely-held secret and Amazon declined to discuss
how it operates. It offered some clues, including a press
release, that said it is trained using Amazon’s product catalog,
reviews, information from the web and question and answer
sections.
But Michael Pachter, a Wedbush Securities analyst, said
Amazon would be turning money away if it didn’t ostensibly open
Rufus’ results up to advertisers. “You’ll most likely get
sponsored results,” he said. “Advertising drives retail and
Amazon is no different – why do you think they are generating
tens of billions of dollars in advertising a year?”
The company on Thursday reported a 27% jump in ad sales in
last year’s fourth quarter to $14.7 billion.
At least initially, Rufus doesn’t appear to be influenced by
advertising. Gil Luria, a D.A. Davidson senior software analyst,
said that was likely necessary to build trust with consumers.
“If they lose your faith in how they answer, you're not going to
ask them anymore," Luria said.
ADVERTISING AND CONSUMER CHOICES
Yet the company has time and again allowed advertising to
creep into its recommendations. Consumers may have once believed
that an “Amazon’s Choice” designation indicated a review or
testing process, but Amazon used to grant that badge to
marketers who were willing to pay for it. Europe’s top antitrust
enforcer Margrethe Vestager said Amazon’s ability to limit
access to the “Amazon’s Choice” label was one reason for her
objection to the company’s planned takeover of Roomba-maker
iRobot. Amazon walked away from the deal last month.
And Amazon previously allowed marketers to place products in
customers’ online baby registries without their knowledge, a
Wall Street Journal investigation found. It has since ended the
practice.
Amazon.com search results included nine sponsored listings
on average, a study by Profitero from 2020 to 2021 found, twice
the amount as Walmart and four times that of Target.
Jim Tierney, Chief Investment Officer of Concentrated US
Growth Equities at AllianceBernstein, said he saw real promise
in Rufus "if you actually have some kind of an AI conversational
shopper.”
“That just means more engagement and more conversion, which
means more revenues and more units (sold)," Tierney said.
But Amazon offered few clues in rolling out Rufus to select
customers. In a call with investors, CEO Andy Jassy said Rufus
“lets customers discover items in a very different way than they
have been able to on e-commerce websites.”
Amazon in a blog post showed how the software might respond
to a query about a particular pickleball paddle’s worthiness for
beginners. “This paddle is a great option for beginners,” the
software replied, according to a screenshot. “The large sweet
spot helps beginner players get the ball over the net
consistently.” In another example it displayed Tyrannosaurus Rex
toys for a query about best toys for a “dinosaur obsessed 5-year
old.”
The company said Rufus is trained using Amazon’s product
catalog, reviews, information from the web, and question and
answer sections.
However Rufus evolves, Luria said Amazon has an edge over
Google GOOGL.O and Microsoft's MSFT.O AI applications
because it has a rich trove of purchasing and personalized data
that’s quite an advantage at the checkout counter.
<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AI chip demand forces Huawei to slow smartphone production
-sources urn:newsml:reuters.com:*:nL8N3EN0B8
Meta to deploy in-house custom chips this year to power AI drive
- memo urn:newsml:reuters.com:*:nL1N3EL3YY
Nvidia's new China-focused AI chip set to be sold at similar
price to Huawei product urn:newsml:reuters.com:*:nL1N3EG09N
Amazon posts AI-fueled cloud, ecommerce growth, shares jump
urn:newsml:reuters.com:*:nL4N3EM4VQ
Investors punish Microsoft, Alphabet as AI returns fall short of
lofty expectations urn:newsml:reuters.com:*:nL4N3EL2WA
Microsoft touts AI strength, but shares dip as market digests
costs urn:newsml:reuters.com:*:nL4N3EK4UO
Google parent Alphabet ad revenue disappoints, CapEx up; shares
sink 6% urn:newsml:reuters.com:*:nL4N3EK4UY
ANALYSIS-Megacap stocks keep lifting US market, but worries over
their dominance grow urn:newsml:reuters.com:*:nL1N3EL24X
INSIGHT-China bets on open-source chips as US export controls
mount urn:newsml:reuters.com:*:nL8N3CQ02E
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>
(Reporting by Arriana McLymore in New York and Greg Bensinger
in San Francisco, Editing by Nick Zieminski)
((arriana.mclymore@thomsonreuters.com; 917-667-8733; Reuters
Messaging: Twitter: @Arriana
greg.bensinger@thomsonreuters.com; Reuters Messaging:
@gregbensinger))