For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
https://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20251126:nRSZ9940Ia&default-theme=true
RNS Number : 9940I Oracle Power PLC 26 November 2025
26 November 2025
Oracle Power PLC
("Oracle" or the "Company")
Gold Results Continue to Expand the Footprint at Northern Zone Gold Project
Oracle Power PLC (AIM: ORCP), an international project developer, is pleased
to announce assay results from the first six drillholes of the recently
completed vertical Grade Control ("GC") drilling programme at the Northern
Zone Intrusive Hosted Gold Project ("Northern Zone" or the "Project"), located
25km east of Kalgoorlie in Western Australia (refer to Figure 1 for location).
Assay results from a further 15 drillholes are still to be assayed, with
results expected in the near term. In addition, drilling is progressing on a
new ~40-hole drilling programme, with 12 holes completed to date.
Highlights
· The Company continues to expand the gold mineralisation footprint at
the Northern Zone.
· Assay results from the first six holes of a 21-hole programme have
been received.
· Significant results from the first batch of results from
pre-Christmas drilling include:
o 9m @ 1.33 g/t Au from 56m,
(NZAC146)
o 3m @ 4.39 g/t Au from 45m,
(NZAC149)
o 3m @ 1.89 g/t Au from 48m,
(NZAC150)
o 5m @ 1.75 g/t Au from 61m (EOH),
(NZAC150)
o 4m @ 0.83 g/t Au from 47m,
(NZAC151)
· Targeted drilling continues, with the current campaign 12 holes into
a further 40-hole programme with results to be reported in the next six to
eight weeks.
Naheed Memon, CEO of Oracle, commented:
"As highlighted before, we planned to undertake two drill programmes before
the end of the year to add to our gold footprint in the top 50-60 metres at
our Northern Zone gold project, and to enhance the MEGA Resources mining
operations scenario for 2026. The results from this first batch of assay
results continue to expand the lateral footprint of the Northern Zone and we
continue to achieve the goal of making the project bigger in the oxide zone.
"Everything is going to plan as we expand the mineralised footprint of the
Project and define the high-grade gold zone hosted within a large lower-grade
porphyry host. The reported results continue to meet and exceed expectations,
with the new high-grade zone being delineated on the eastern margin of the
Project, now looking to move northwards.
"The second shallow drill programme is well underway with more samples now in
for assay, and we expect to report these assay results over the next six to
eight weeks."
Results from the GC programme (Tables 1-3) continue to successfully intersect
the mineralised host porphyry over an expanding footprint, consistently
supporting the broader gold mineralisation model. Five drillholes on the
eastern extension intersected significant gold mineralisation (see Figure 2),
with the footprint expanding northwards. A key SW-NE cross-section derived
from 3D Leapfrog software is illustrated in Figure 3. The interpretation
illustrates gold grade shells, derived from all the significant intercepts
announced by the Company to April 2025. The Leapfrog model will be updated
once all pending assays are received.
Northern Zone is hosted within a porphyry unit (Tonalite-Trondhjemite
Intrusion, TTI), with high background gold and horizontal gold mineralised
units within the TTI unit. The Northern Zone Project sits within the Canon
Shear or fault zone, with further drilling required to define the limits of
mineralisation identified to date. The horizontal mineralisation makes
drilling to date perpendicular to the gold mineralisation, and no water in
drilling to a depth of 60 metres makes the TTI also suitable for drilling with
the techniques the Company has utilised to date.
The Northern Zone JV will continue advancing its understanding of the
Kalgoorlie Project before proceeding with a maiden Mineral Resource Estimate
(MRE), but this drilling will be used by Mega Resources in their mine planning
for our joint plans to start mining in the first half of 2026.
**ENDS**
END
For further information on Oracle, visit the Company's website at
http://www.oraclepower.co.uk (http://www.oraclepower.co.uk) or contact:
Oracle Power PLC
Naheed Memon -
CEO
+44 (0) 203 580 4314
Strand Hanson Limited (Nominated Adviser & Broker)
Rory Murphy, Matthew Chandler, Rob
Patrick
+44 (0) 20 7409 3494
St Brides Partners Limited (Financial PR)
Susie Geliher, Isabel de
Salis
+44 (0) 20 7236 1177
This announcement contains inside information for the purposes of Article 7 of
EU Regulation No. 596/2014, which forms part of United Kingdom domestic law by
virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, as amended by virtue of
the Market Abuse (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019.
Competent Person's Statement
The information in this announcement that relates to exploration results,
exploration targets, mineral resources or ore reserves is based on information
compiled by Mr Edward Mead, who is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of
Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Mead is a director of Riversgold Limited and a
consultant to the Company through Doraleda Pty Ltd. Mr Mead has sufficient
experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of
deposit under consideration and to the activity that he is undertaking to
qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the
`Australasian Code for Reporting Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and
Ore Reserves' (the JORC Code). Mr Mead consents to the inclusion of this
information in the form and context in which it appears in this announcement.
Figure 1: Location of Northern Zone Gold Project in relation to the Kalgoorlie
Golden Mile/Fimiston "Super Pit".
Figure 2: GC drill collar plan and most recently reported significant drill
intercepts, with gold grade contours from all drilling results up to April
2025. Contours are expected to be updated once all pending assays are
received.
Figure 3: Cross-section of 3D Leapfrog software model. The interpretation
illustrates gold grade shells, derived from all the significant intercepts
reported [by the Company] to April 2025. The Leapfrog model is expected to be
updated once all pending assays are received. The model is constrained via a
25m buffer to all the Riversgold/Oracle drill hole traces that have been
drilled at Northern Zone since 2021. Refer to Figure 2 for the location of the
section line.
Table 1: Northern Zone Significant Intercepts from all Grade Control drill rig
drillholes
Hole ID From (m) To (m) Width (m) Au g/t Intercept
NZAC146 56 65 9 1.33 9m @ 1.33 g/t Au from 56m, NZAC146
NZAC149 45 48 3 4.39 3m @ 4.39 g/t Au from 45m, NZAC149
including 47 48 1 11.78 Including 1m @ 11.78 g/t Au from 47m, NZAC149
NZAC150 48 51 3 1.89 3m @ 1.89 g/t Au from 48m, NZAC150
NZAC150 61 66 5 1.75 5m @ 1.75 g/t Au from 61m (EOH), NZAC150
including 64 66 2 3.49 Including 2m @ 3.49 g/t Au from 64m (EOH), NZAC150
NZAC151 47 51 4 0.83 4m @ 0.83 g/t Au from 47m, NZAC151
Table 2: Northern Zone Drill Collar Locations
Hole id MGA_E MGA_N Elevation (m) Total Depth (m) Dip ((o)) AZM_MGA Date
NZAC146 381899.8 6592682.5 356.7 66 0 -90 20/10/25
NZAC147 381912.2 6592694.9 356.8 63 0 -90 21/10/25
NZAC148 381919.8 6592682.5 356.7 66 0 -90 22/10/25
NZAC149 381932.2 6592 694.9 356.8 60 0 -90 22/10/25
NZAC150 381939.8 6592682.5 356.8 66 0 -90 23/10/25
NZAC151 381952.2 6592694.9 356.7 66 0 -90 23/10/25
Table 3: Northern Zone assay results above 0.3 g/t Au from all GC drillholes
Hole ID Depth From Depth To Width Au ppm
NZAC146 56 57 1 3.46
NZAC146 57 58 1 1.71
NZAC146 58 59 1 1.50
NZAC146 59 60 1 1.39
NZAC146 60 61 1 0.76
NZAC146 62 63 1 1.01
NZAC146 63 64 1 1.28
NZAC146 64 65 1 0.65
NZAC148 47 48 1 0.44
NZAC148 60 61 1 0.43
NZAC149 42 43 1 0.98
NZAC149 45 46 1 1.35
NZAC149 47 48 1 11.78
NZAC150 48 49 1 2.04
NZAC150 49 50 1 3.33
NZAC150 50 51 1 0.30
NZAC150 61 62 1 0.50
NZAC150 62 63 1 0.66
NZAC150 63 64 1 0.59
NZAC150 64 65 1 4.26
NZAC150 65 66 1 2.72
NZAC151 47 48 1 2.01
NZAC151 48 49 1 0.52
NZAC151 50 51 1 0.59
JORC INFORMATION
The following Tables are provided to ensure compliance with the JORC Code
(2012 Edition) requirements for the reporting of Exploration Results at
Northern Zone.
Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section applies to all succeeding sections)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling techniques Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific Every metre drilled was placed on the ground.
specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals
under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF 6m composites were collected using a scoop method of sampling the coarse
instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad reject sample for the first 24m.
meaning of sampling.
1m sampling using a rifle splitter was trialed on the clays, from 24m, with
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the sampling deemed to create a high degree risk of smearing. The clays are not
appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. wet, but have a damp characteristic. A large metal scoop was used to sample
between 70-90% of material from each metre drilled, to total between 2-3kg
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public samples.
Report.
Standard reference material, sample duplicates and blanks, were undertaken at
In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively 25m sample intervals.
simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from
which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other Samples were sent to the laboratory for crushing, splitting and analysis.
cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold
that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation Analysis was undertaken by Jinnings laboratories (Kalgoorlie) for gold assay
types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. by 50g fire assay.
Drilling techniques Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, Australian Surface Drilling completed the program using a face sampling hammer
auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard on an Atlas Copco grade control rig.
tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is
oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
Drill sample recovery Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results Drill recovery was routinely recorded via estimation of the comparative
assessed. percentage of the volume of the sample bag by the company geologist.
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of The sample recovery was deemed excellent for representative assays.
the samples.
The cyclone was cleaned or checked every 6m.
Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
material.
Logging Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged All holes have been geologically logged for lithology, mineralisation and
to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, weathering. As well as whether dry, damp or wet.
mining studies and metallurgical studies.
Logging is quantitative for presence of quartz veins. All other logging is
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, qualitative.
channel, etc) photography.
A brief description of each drilling sample was recorded and a permanent
The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. record has been collected and stored in chip trays for reference.
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. 1m sampling using a rifle splitter was trialed on the clays, from 24m, with
sampling deemed to create a high degree risk of smearing. The clays are not
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether wet, but have a damp characteristic. A large metal scoop was used to sample
sampled wet or dry. between 70-90% of material from each metre drilled, to total between 2-3kg
samples.
For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample
preparation technique. Standard reference material, sample duplicates and blanks, were undertaken at
25m sample intervals.
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples. Samples were sent to the laboratory for crushing, splitting and analysis.
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ The use of fire assay with 50g charge for all AC drilling provides a level of
material collected, including for instance results for field confidence in the assay database. The sampling and assaying are considered
duplicate/second-half sampling. representative of the in-situ material.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being The sample size of 2-3 kilograms is appropriate and representative of the
sampled. grain size and mineralisation style of the deposit.
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory Jinnings (Kalgoorlie) were used for all analysis of drill samples submitted by
procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. Riversgold. The laboratory techniques below are for all samples submitted to
Jinnings and are considered appropriate for the style of mineralisation
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the defined within the Northern Zone Project area:
parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and
model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. Samples above 3Kg were riffle split.
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, Pulverise to 95% passing 75 microns
duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of
accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. 50-gram Fire Assay (FA50A) - Au Duplicates, Standards and Blanks were used for
external laboratory checks by RGL
Verification of sampling and assaying The verification of significant intersections by either independent or Intercepts were reviewed by 2 company personnel.
alternative company personnel.
The use of twinned holes.
Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data
storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Location of data points Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and The collar position of each hole has been marked out with a Garmin Inreach
down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Explorer+ hand held GPS, and will be picked up by Spectrum Surveys
Mineral Resource estimation. (Kalgoorlie) using a DGPS.
Specification of the grid system used.
Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
Data spacing and distribution Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. The holes were drilled on a nominal Northeast-Southwest 20m spacing on
traverses 15-20m apart.
Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the
degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource
and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.
Whether sample compositing has been applied.
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible Based on logging of diamond core the drill holes appear to be orientated
structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit perpendicular to strike and dip of the main mineralised structures.
type.
An interpreted fault though the middle of the mineralisation may have caused
If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of some displacement.
key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias,
this should be assessed and reported if material.
Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample security. Company personnel delivered samples to Jinnings Kalgoorlie where they were
submitted for assay.
Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. Data reviews will be conducted on completion of further drilling
Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or The Northern Zone Project is comprised of one granted prospecting licence
material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, (P25/2651) which covers an area of 82 hectares, and is held in the name of
overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or Riversgold (Australia) Pty Ltd 80/100, Oracle Gold (WA) Pty Ltd 20/100.
national park and environmental settings.
The JV documents are to be formalised by December 2025. Oracle will be
The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known required to contribute pro-rata or dilute.
impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
Exploration done by other parties Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. The majority of previous exploration in the area was by Northern Mining during
2007 to 2012 under the Blair North project, multiple small resource areas were
identified at the George's Reward area to the south of P25/2651. Numerous gold
intersections were recorded.
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. The deposit sought is (Intrusion Related Gold System (IRGS) style of mineral
deposit.
Northern Zone is hosted within a porphyry unit (Tonalite- Trondhjemite
Intrusion, TTI), with high background gold and horizontal gold mineralised
units within the TTI unit. The Northern Zone Project sits within the Canon
Shear or fault zone, with further drilling required to define the limits of
mineralisation identified to date.
Drill hole Information A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration Refer to Tables and Figures within the body of the release.
results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material
drill holes:
easting and northing of the drill hole collar
elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the
drill hole collar
dip and azimuth of the hole
down hole length and interception depth
hole length.
If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the
information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why
this is the case.
Data aggregation methods In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum Intersections are weighted average grades based on a 0.001 g/t Au cut-off with
and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off unlimited waste zones but with a targeted grade of 0.4-0.6g/t Au.
grades are usually Material and should be stated.
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and
longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation
should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be
shown in detail.
The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be
clearly stated.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration The diamond drilling program in 2023 confirmed the apparent widths of
Results. mineralisation as being perpendicular to foliation and veining. Step out RC
drilling to be the same as the diamond drilling. Mineralisation has been
If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is determined from structural logging to be horizontal and vertical drilling is
known, its nature should be reported. therefore true width drilling.
If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should
be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true width not
known').
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts See body of the announcement for relevant diagrams and photos.
should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should
include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and
appropriate sectional views.
Balanced reporting Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, The reporting of exploration results is considered balanced by the competent
representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be person.
practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.
Other substantive exploration data Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported See body of the announcement.
including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey
results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical
and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
Further work The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions · Follow up phases of drilling to further test strike to be undertaken.
or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).
· Complete a maiden MRE
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the
main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this
information is not commercially sensitive.
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
. END DRLDBBDBLXDDGUU
Copyright 2019 Regulatory News Service, all rights reserved