REG - Power Metal Res. - Completion of East Hawkrock Drill Programme

Power Metal ResourcesAnnouncement

Yesterday 07:00

For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
https://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20260428:nRSb1006Ca&default-theme=true

RNS Number : 1006C  Power Metal Resources PLC  28 April 2026

Power Metal Resources PLC

("Power Metal" or the "Company")

28th April 2026

Uranium Joint Venture

Fermi Exploration: Completion of East Hawkrock Drill Programme

Structural and Hydrothermal Framework Identified

HIGHLIGHTS:

·     East Hawkrock diamond core drilling programme completed with nine
holes and a total of 2,120.4 metres drilled.

 

·     Drilling confirmed a highly favourable geological setting for
hosting unconformity-related uranium mineralisation, including:

o  structurally complex basement rocks;

o  deep palaeoweathering profiles; and

o  evidence for hydrothermal fluid systems with elevated radioactivity.

 

·     Comprehensive laboratory analysis underway, with results
anticipated in late Q2/early Q3 2026 in order to guide future exploration.

 

Sean Wade, Chief Executive Officer of Power Metal Resources PLC commented:

"We are pleased to report the completion of our maiden drilling programme at
East Hawkrock. While these initial holes did not intersect economic uranium
mineralisation, the campaign has successfully validated our underlying
exploration model.

We now await the comprehensive laboratory analysis, which will be instrumental
in refining our understanding of the system and guiding our future exploration
strategy."

DRILL PROGRAMME SUMMARY

The maiden winter diamond drill programme, comprising nine NQ core diameter
(47.6mm) holes for a total of 2,120.4 metres drilled, was designed to test
multiple geophysical and radiometric anomalies across the Small Lake and Joint
Lake target areas (Figure 1). The programme ran from 1 March - 22 April 2026.
The programme was terminated earlier than expected due to warmer weather
impacting ground stability of proposed drilling locations.

While these initial, first-pass exploratory holes did not encounter economic
uranium mineralisation, the campaign confirmed the presence of the critical
structural and hydrothermal elements consistent with unconformity-related
uranium systems within the Athabasca Basin.

System Validation & Hydrothermal Activity

Drilling across the property intersected multiple factors indicative of a
highly favourable geological setting. The basal sandstone units consistently
displayed strong evidence of hydrothermal fluid circulation, marked by
pervasive "brick-red" hematite alteration, intermittent core bleaching, and
elevated background radioactivity of up to 280 counts per second ("CPS"). This
indicates the passage of highly oxidising, acidic fluids-the primary transport
mechanism for uranium. Furthermore, holes such as EHR26-01 and EHR26-05
exhibited a transition into a coarse basal conglomerate unit, representing a
high-energy depositional environment that serves as a highly permeable
regional aquifer for basinal fluids.

Small Lake Target Area

Drilling at Small Lake penetrated the overlying sandstones to reveal a
deformed basement package of foliated pelitic and biotite gneisses. While
graphitic units have yet to be encountered in the Small Lake Area-suggesting
these units are either absent, very thin, heavily fractured, or overprinted
with later alteration-the presence of structural fracturing, moderate folding,
and thick palaeoweathered profiles confirms a highly active structural
setting. The upper basement sequences universally exhibited pronounced
palaeoweathered profiles, extending up to 53 metres deep in EHR26-007,
dominated by intense chlorite, clay, and hematite alteration. These
palaeoweathering profiles are inferred to be important in the generation of
unconformity-related uranium deposits.

Joint Lake Target Area

At Joint Lake, drilling targeted an interpreted fold structure and linear
conductive features. Beneath the unconformity, drilling intersected
structurally deformed amphibolite hosting clay-chlorite-carbonate fault zones
and up to 3% disseminated pyrite. This disseminated pyrite generated a
false-positive for massive graphite and is interpreted as the source of the
local conductive anomaly, prompting a strategic decision to cancel one planned
hole in the area. While there is scope for such geology to host uranium, it is
not as favourable as the target graphitic units.

Note: Detailed, hole-by-hole geological logging and sedimentological data have
been appended to this release for technical reference (see Appendix B:
Drillhole Summaries, located beneath the Appendix A: Drill Collar Table).

 

DRILL PROGRAMME DETAILS AND NEXT STEPS

As shown in Figure 1, diamond drill holes ("DDHs") EHR26-01 and EHR26-02 were
drilled in the Joint Lake Target Area, to the southwest of the property, while
DDHs EHR26-03 to EHR26-007 were drilled in the Small Lake Target Area, to the
north and northeast of the Property. The drill collar coordinates are provided
in Table 1 below.

The drill programme was carried out by Team Drilling Ltd, with technical
services provided by Axiom Exploration Ltd, and helicopter support from Access
Helicopters Ltd. The drilling campaign was staged out of Points North Landing
in north-eastern Saskatchewan.

A full discussion on previous work on the property, the combined geophysical
and radon targeting and target rationale was announced on 27 March 2026 and is
available at the following link:

https://polaris.brighterir.com/public/power_metal_resources/news/rns/story/rgo810x
(https://polaris.brighterir.com/public/power_metal_resources/news/rns/story/rgo810x)

Next Steps

Samples have been submitted for geochemical assay, short-wave infrared "SWIR"
(for clay mineralogy) investigation, petrophysical (to constrain geophysical
models) and petrographic (to understand mineral assemblages and timing)
studies. The samples are either at their respective laboratories or in transit
to them for analysis. Analytical work is currently underway across several
facilities; Geochemical samples are being tested at the Saskatchewan Research
Council Geoanalytical Laboratories, whilst SWIR samples are being processed by
the Axiom Exploration Group in Saskatoon. Petrographic samples are being cut
by Vancouver Petrographics prior to analysis at Saint Mary's University's
Mineral Imaging & Analysis Laboratory (Department of Earth Science);
finally, petrophysical samples are undergoing analysis at the Rock Mechanics
Laboratory at the University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.

The results of this analysis will be reviewed internally and reported to the
market in due course. The analysis and review are expected to be complete in
late Q2, early Q3 2026.

 

Figure 1 - Drill collar locations for the Winter 2026 programme on the East
Hawkrock Property. Drill holes EHR26-04 and EHR26-04A are omitted; both
terminated at shallow depths and share a collar location with EHR26-04B.

 

FURTHER INFORMATION

Technical Review

Although these first-pass exploratory holes did not encounter economic uranium
mineralisation, and radioactivity was largely background;  multiple critical
factors indicative of a geological situation respective for unconformity
related uranium elsewhere are observed from this first pass drilling
programme.

The basal units of the Athabasca Sandstones themselves offer a source of
porosity for late stage fluid movement; Holes such as EHR26-01 and EHR26-05
exhibit a transition into a basal conglomerate or coarse basal conglomerate
unit containing larger pebbles (up to 2-3 cm). This basal unit represents a
high-energy depositional environment directly overlying the palaeosurface,
serving as a highly permeable regional aquifer for basinal fluids.(1) This
permeability and the potential for movement of uraniferous fluids is
highlighted by the slight elevation in CPS readings of upto 120 CPS directly
above or within the unconformity structure in holes EHR26-01, EHR26-03,
EHR26-04B.

Furthermore, the presence of bleaching and hematite alteration is a common
component of the alteration in the sandstones above unconformity related
deposits. While the upper sandstones display pervasive diagenetic hematite,
the basal 20 to 40 metres exhibit distinct hydrothermal overprinting.

Drillholes EHR26-02, EHR26-03, EHR26-04B, and EHR26-07 all record zones of
strong, pervasive "brick-red" hydrothermal hematite alternating with zones of
core bleaching. This indicates the passage of highly oxidising, acidic
fluids-the primary transport mechanism for uranium.(2 3)

The property area has been established as an area of structural complexity,
with highly deformed, strongly foliated pelitic and biotite gneisses were
successfully intersected in drillholes EHR26-04B and EHR26-06. These
metasedimentary units represent the primary structural targets in the basin,
additionally, the presence of pyrite, which has been noted in EHR26-002,
EHR26-004B, and EHR26-005 has acted as a reductant in other Athabascan Uranium
Mineralisation Systems.(4)

However, the disseminated pyrite in amphibolite generated a false-positive for
massive graphite in the Joint Lake Area, and while there is scope for such
geology to host uranium, such geology is not as favourable as the target
graphitic units. Additionally, the programme graphitic units are yet to be
encountered in the Small Lake Area, suggesting these units are either absent,
very thin, heavily fractured or overprinted with later alteration.

In summary, the maiden diamond drilling programme intersected encouraging
geology consistent with established unconformity-related uranium systems
within the Athabasca Basin. While these initial, first-pass holes did not
intersect economic uranium mineralisation or highly elevated radiometric
anomalies, the structural and hydrothermal framework identified retains
promise. Further commentary on the property's prospectivity and future
exploration vectors will be provided following a comprehensive analysis of the
drilled geology and integrated geophysical data.

 

Appendix A: Table of Drill Collars on the East Hawkrock Property

 Drill Hole ID  UTM Northing  UTM       Elevation  Downhole Depth (m)  Hole Azimuth  Hole Dip

                              Easting   (m)
 EHR26-01       6530268       533411    341.12     242.9               135           -60
 EHR26-02       6529853       533536    325.28     299                 357           -60
 EHR26-03       6532679       536364    331.131    299                 248           -60
 EHR26-04       6532573       535750    325        30.6                0             -60
 EHR26-04A      6532573       535750    325        16.9                0             -60
 EHR26-04B      6532573       535750    325        299                 0             -60
 EHR26-05       6532452       536366    324.9      305                 45            -60
 EHR26-06       6532747       537317    335.293    290                 335           -70
 EHR26-07       6532992       537798    351.63     338                 337           -60

Table note: NAD83 Zone 13N, Hole Numbers EHR26-01, EHR26-04, EHR26-04A were
abandoned before their target depths.

Table 1 : Drillhole Collar Locations from the 2026 Drilling Programme on the
East Hawkrock Property

Appendix B: Drillhole Summaries

EHR26-01

Drillhole EHR26-01, which was planned as JL-C, was completed to a total
downhole depth of 242.9 metres (210.4 metres true vertical depth), testing the
overlying sedimentary sequence. Due to challenging drilling conditions, it did
not intersect the unconformity, and thus the linear conductive feature at
depth remains untested.

The sandstone intersected by EHR26-01 is characterised by dominant planar
bedding and pervasive diagenetic hematite alteration. Encouragingly, core
logging indicates the drillhole was approaching the highly prospective basal
unconformity. From 235.4 metres downhole (203.9m TVD) to the end of the hole,
there is a distinct increase in pebble size and frequency, marking a
transition towards a basal conglomerate unit that overlies the basement and
target conductive feature. This sedimentological shift is accompanied by
moderate hematite alteration and a subtle but distinct elevation in background
radioactivity, reaching up to 110 CPS.

While the regional unconformity and underlying metamorphic basement were not
intersected within this specific interval, the lithological progression and
positive radiometric signature at the base of the hole provide valuable
structural vectoring data and confirm the fertility of the lower sedimentary
package in this area.

 

EHR26-02

Drillhole EHR26-02, which was planned as JL-B, was successfully completed to a
total downhole depth of 299.0 metres (258.9 metres true vertical depth),
targeting an interpreted fold structure within the Joint Lake Area. Drilled at
an inclination of -60 degrees, the hole successfully intersected the regional
unconformity at 218.5 metres downhole (189.2 metres TVD) beneath a sequence of
sandstone. Notably, the lower sandstone displayed pervasive hydrothermal
hematite alteration and trace bleaching, indicating significant fluid
movement.

Beneath the unconformity, the drillhole intersected a basement sequence of
granitic gneiss and structurally deformed amphibolite. The basement exhibited
strong palaeoweathering and structural weakness, including minor shearing and
clay-chlorite-carbonate fault zones within the amphibolite, accompanied by up
to 3% disseminated and fracture-hosted pyrite.

The presence of disseminated pyrite within the amphibolite is considered to be
the source of the weak conductive anomaly, and while the structural complexity
and alteration were welcomed, the lack of graphite associated with the
amphibolite; and the structural continuity between the JL-B and JL-A targets,
resulted in the cancellation of the planned JL-A drillhole.

 

EHR26-03

Drillhole EHR26-03, which was planned as SL-B, was successfully completed to a
total downhole depth of 299.0 metres (258.9 metres true vertical depth).
Drilled at an inclination of -60 degrees, the hole was designed to test a
coincident gravity and magnetic low below Small Lake. This geophysical
signature was interpreted to represent a principal structural corridor hosting
graphitic metasedimentary units, further supported by its location within an
area of anomalous radon.

The drillhole intersected the regional unconformity at 201.5 metres downhole
(174.5 metres TVD) beneath a thick sandstone sequence. Encouragingly, the
lower sandstone displayed clear signs of fluid movement, exhibiting
intermittent bleaching and zones of strong, pervasive hydrothermal hematite
alteration just above the unconformity. This was accompanied by a subtle
elevation in background radioactivity, peaking at 120 counts per second (cps).

Beneath the unconformity, the hole intersected a structurally fractured
basement sequence of granitic gneiss and pegmatite, rather than the targeted
graphitic units. The uppermost basement features a pronounced, 24-metre-thick
palaeoweathered profile with strong pervasive hematite, chlorite, and clay
alteration.

While the specific graphitic source of the combined geophysical anomalies was
not directly intersected, the presence of local fracturing, moderate folding,
and hydrothermal alteration confirms an active structural setting.

 

EHR26-04, EHR216-04A and EHR26-04B

Due to challenging drilling, hole EHR26-04 was terminated at 30.6 m, with the
follow-up hole EHR26-04A terminated at 16.9 m. Both of these holes terminated
in the upper Athabascan Sandstones.

Drillhole EHR26-04B successfully tested the targeted geophysical anomalies,
reaching a total depth of 299.0 metres (approximately 257.6m true vertical
depth). Drilling penetrated the thick Athabascan Sandstone sequence before
intersecting the unconformity at 207.5 metres. Encouragingly, the basal
sandstone (186.0-203.0m) exhibits strong patchy hematite.

Beneath the unconformity, the hole intersected a highly deformed basement
package of strongly foliated pelitic and biotite gneisses. This
metasedimentary sequence is interpreted to explain the coincident conductive
and magnetic low targets. This upper basement geology of pelitic and biotite
gneisses features a pronounced palaeoweathered profile containing strong to
intense, pervasive hematite, chlorite, and clay alteration extending down to
256.5 metres. Background radioactivity peaked slightly at 120 cps deep in the
basement alongside trace disseminated pyrite.

 

EHR26-05

Drillhole EHR26-05 was completed to a total downhole depth of 305.0 metres
(approximately 264.1 metres true vertical depth)). This drillhole was
specifically designed to test for graphitic units, with a coincident gravity
high interpreted to represent a deep-seated basement source implying
significant structural control.

The drillhole penetrated a thick overlying sandstone sequence before
intersecting the unconformity at 203.6 metres downhole (176.3m TVD).
Encouragingly, the lower sandstone profile exhibits a progressive increase in
alteration, transitioning from moderate to strong hematite. This basal
sandstone unit returned distinctly elevated radioactivity ranging from 150 to
280 counts per second (cps) alongside trace bleaching. Beneath the
unconformity, the drillhole intersected a 6.5-metre-thick sequence of strongly
foliated, heavily weathered pelitic gneiss exhibiting moderate to strong
hematite and chlorite alteration. Below this palaeoweathered profile, the
basement transitioned into a thick sequence of relatively unaltered granitic
gneiss. At depth (281.7 to 288.8 metres; 244-250.1 m TVD) EHR26-05 intersected
dark garnet pelite with minor faulting and disseminated pyrite mineralisation.

 

EHR26-06

Drillhole EHR26-06 was completed to a total downhole depth of 290.0 metres
(251.1 m TVD). This hole was specifically designed to test a strong basement
Electromagnetic (EM) target situated within a structurally complex zone,
interpreted to represent multiple linear structural trends.

The drillhole penetrated the overlying sandstone sequence, successfully
intersecting the regional unconformity at 199.0 metres downhole (172.3m TVD).
The lower sandstone profile had a zone of weak bleaching was recorded from
156.2 metres, which transitioned sharply into strong, pervasive hematite
alteration extending directly down to the unconformity.

Beneath the unconformity, the drillhole successfully validated the structural
interpretation by intersecting an alternating, highly deformed basement
sequence. The basement is characterised by packages of strongly foliated
pelitic gneisses (199.0m to 231.2m and 240.2m to 262.6m) interspersed with
intervals of granitic gneiss. These pelitic metasediments exhibit strong
tectonic foliation accompanied by moderate to strong pervasive chlorite, clay,
and hematite alteration. No significant radioactivity was encountered.

 

EHR26-07

Drillhole EHR26-07 was successfully completed to a total downhole depth of
338.0 metres (approximately 286.7 metres true vertical depth, averaging a
-58.0 degree inclination). Following 32.0 metres of overburden, the drillhole
penetrated a thick sandstone sequence before intersecting the regional
unconformity at 219.4 metres (186.1m TVD).

This hole, in additional the previously planned holes, was drilled to test an
inferred gravity and magnetic low, and faulting associated with it. A sister
hole was planned to the northwest, to test the conductive high and magnetic
low, but was postponed due to warming weather causing ground instability
risks.

The lower Athabasca Sandstones displayed clear evidence of significant fluid
movement. The basal section (198.0m to 219.4m) featured strong to intense
banded and pervasive hematite, alongside intermittent intervals of
hydrothermal hematite and trace bleaching.

Notably, the unconformity itself is marked by a sharp, structurally faulted
contact with strong, structurally controlled hematite-clay brecciation and
alteration within a meter scale fault system. Beneath this fault structure,
the basement comprises weakly foliated granitic gneiss. A pronounced,
53-metre-thick palaeoweathered profile extends below the unconformity,
characterised by pervasive hematite, chlorite, and clay alteration before
transitioning into fresh granite at 274.6 metres.

 

GLOSSARY

 Term                            Definition
 Basal Conglomerate              A coarse-grained sedimentary rock composed of rounded rock fragments (pebbles
                                 or cobbles) located at the very bottom (base) of a sedimentary basin.
 Basement Rock                   The thick, ancient foundation of metamorphic and igneous rocks that forms the
                                 continental crust, sitting beneath younger sedimentary rock layers.
 Bleaching                       The removal of colour-often the removal of red iron oxides-from rocks via
                                 chemical reduction during the passage of active hydrothermal fluids.
 cps (Counts Per Second)         A standard unit of measurement used to quantify the level of background
                                 radioactivity detected in the rock core.
 Diagenetic                      Relating to the physical and chemical changes that occur as loose sediment is
                                 gradually compressed and cemented into solid sedimentary rock.
 Disseminated Pyrite             Fine particles of the sulphide mineral pyrite (iron sulphide) scattered
                                 diffusely throughout a rock body, rather than being concentrated in solid
                                 veins.
 Electromagnetic (EM) Anomaly    A zone identified by geophysical surveys where the rock conducts electricity
                                 better than surrounding areas, often indicating the presence of graphite,
                                 water, or sulphide minerals.
 Garnet Pelite / Pelitic Gneiss  A highly deformed metamorphic rock originally formed from fine-grained
                                 mudstones or siltstones, subjected to intense heat and pressure.
 Graphitic Units                 Rock layers containing significant amounts of graphite (carbon), which act as
                                 strong electrical conductors and are key structural targets in uranium
                                 exploration.
 Hematite Alteration             The chemical modification of a rock resulting in the addition or formation of
                                 hematite (an iron oxide), typically turning the rock a distinct 'brick-red'
                                 colour.
 Hydrothermal Fluid              Hot, naturally occurring, mineral-rich water that circulates through faults
                                 and fractures in the Earth's crust, capable of transporting and depositing
                                 metals like uranium.
 Palaeoweathering Profile        A geological record of ancient weathering, that occurred on a land surface
                                 before it was subsequently buried by younger sediments.
 Petrographic                    The detailed macroscopic and microscopic description and systematic
                                 classification of rocks and their mineral assemblages.
 Petrophysical                   Relating to the physical and chemical properties of rocks and how they
                                 interact with fluids, often used to calibrate and refine regional geophysical
                                 models.
 SWIR (Short-Wave Infrared)      An analytical laboratory technique used to identify and map specific
                                 alteration minerals, particularly clays, based on how they absorb and reflect
                                 infrared light.
 True Vertical Depth (TVD)       The absolute vertical distance from the surface straight down to a specific
                                 point in a drillhole, as opposed to the total drilled length of a hole angled
                                 into the ground.
 Unconformity                    A buried erosional surface separates two rock masses of significantly
                                 different ages, representing a gap in the geological record. These different
                                 rock types may have different properties, which can influence mineralising
                                 fluids in different ways.

 

REFERENCES

1 Kyser, K., Hiatt, E., Renac, C., Durocher, K., Holk, G., & Deckart, K.
(2000). Diagenetic fluids in paleo- and meso-Proterozoic sedimentary basins
and their implications for long protracted fluid histories. In K. Kyser (Ed.),
Fluids and Basin Evolution (Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course
Series, Vol. 28, pp. 225-262).

2 Jefferson, Charles W. & Thomas, David & Gandhi, S & Ramaekers, P
& Delauney, G & Brisbin, D & Cutts, C & Portella, P &
Olson, R. (2007). Unconformity-associated uranium deposits of the Athabasca
Basin, Saskatchewan and Alberta.

3 Hoeve, J., & Quirt, D. (1984). Mineralization and alteration associated
with the unconformity-type uranium deposits in Saskatchewan. In Proterozoic
Unconformity and Stratabound Uranium Deposits (pp. 103-121). IAEA.

4 Alexandre, P., Kyser, K., Polito, P., & Thomas, D. (2005). Alteration
mineralogy and stable isotope geochemistry of Paleoproterozoic basement-hosted
unconformity-type uranium deposits in the Athabasca Basin, Canada. Economic
Geology, 100(8), 1547-1563.

 

QUALIFIED PERSON STATEMENT

The technical information contained in this disclosure has been read and
approved by Mr Nick O'Reilly (MSc, DIC, MIMMM QMR, MAusIMM, FGS), who is a
qualified geologist and acts as the Qualified Person under the AIM Rules -
Note for Mining and Oil & Gas Companies. Mr O'Reilly is a Principal
consultant working for Mining Analyst Consulting Ltd which has been retained
by Power Metal Resources PLC to provide technical support.

 

 

This announcement contains inside information for the purposes of Article 7 of
the Market Abuse Regulation (EU) 596/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic
law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 ("MAR"), and is
disclosed in accordance with the Company's obligations under Article 17 of
MAR.

 

 

For further information please visit https://www.powermetalresources.com/
(https://www.powermetalresources.com/)  or contact:

 Power Metal Resources plc
 Sean Wade (Chief Executive Officer)                                             +44 (0) 20 3778 1396

 SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP (Nomad and Joint Broker)
 Ewan Leggat/Jen Clarke                                                          +44 (0) 20 3470 0470

 Tamesis Partners LLP (Joint Broker)
 Richard Greenfield/Charlie Bendon                                               +44 (0) 20 3882 2868

 BlytheRay (PR Advisors)

 Tim Blythe/Megan Ray/Alastair Roberts                                           +44 (0) 20 7138 3204

 

NOTES TO EDITORS

Power Metal Resources plc - Background

Power Metal Resources plc (AIM: POW, OTCQB: POWMF) is a London-listed metals
exploration company which finances and manages global resource projects and is
seeking large scale metal discoveries.

The Company has a principal focus on opportunities offering district scale
potential across a global portfolio including precious, base and strategic
metal exploration in North America, Africa, Saudi Arabia, Oman and Australia.

Project interests range from early-stage greenfield exploration to later-stage
prospects currently subject to drill programmes.

Power Metal will develop projects internally or through strategic joint
ventures until a project becomes ready for disposal through outright sale or
separate listing on a recognised stock exchange thereby crystallising the
value generated from our internal exploration and development work.

Value generated through disposals will be deployed internally to drive the
Company's growth or may be returned to shareholders through share buy backs,
dividends or in-specie distributions of assets.

 

This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
 or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.

RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
.   END  DRLEAKLXALLKEFA



            Copyright 2019 Regulatory News Service, all rights reserved