REG - Resolute Mining Ltd - Initial Mineral Resource at La Debo
18/11/2025 07:00
For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
https://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20251118:nRSR9108Ha&default-theme=true
RNS Number : 9108H Resolute Mining Limited 18 November 2025
18 November 2025
Initial Mineral Resource Estimate at La Debo Project, Côte d'Ivoire
Resolute Mining Limited ("Resolute" or "the Company") (ASX/LSE: RSG), the
Africa-focused gold miner, is pleased to announce an initial Mineral Resource
Estimate ("MRE") at the La Debo Project in Côte d'Ivoire - a strategically
important jurisdiction for Resolute.
La Debo is one of Resolute's key exploration assets in Côte d'Ivoire. The new
MRE comprises 643 koz of contained gold which is 60% larger than historical
estimates. This has been achieved through exploration success at the G3S
prospect on the La Debo permit. The focus of future exploration is on
extending the high-grade mineralisation at G3S as well as drill testing
targets in the south-western half of the permit. In October 2025, Resolute was
granted two new exploration permits, Serihio and Okroyou, that are contiguous
to the south of the La Debo permit. Resolute plans to start exploration across
these permits in 2026 and sees potential for the resources at the La Debo
project to expand further. Depending on results, the MRE may be updated in
late 2026.
The Company has over 7 Moz of gold resource across three assets in Côte
d'Ivoire. Doropo is the most advanced project with an updated feasibility
study expected in December 2025. Following this and granting of the
exploitation permit, construction is planned to commence in 2026 with first
gold production in 2028. The Company's other exploration project in Côte
d'Ivoire is the ABC Project which has a current MRE of 2.2 Moz. An exploration
program consisting of approximately 25,000m of RC drilling has commenced and
will continue over the next six months.
Exploration remains central to Resolute's growth strategy and a key driver of
long-term shareholder value. The Company's ongoing exploration programs are
designed to expand resource potential, extend mine life, and unlock new
opportunities across its portfolio. In addition to the active exploration
campaigns in Côte d'Ivoire, the Company expects to announce updates on its
exploration and mine extension activities in Senegal before year-end,
reinforcing its commitment to sustained value creation through discovery and
development.
Highlights
• Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate for La Debo (G3N and G3S
prospects) of 17.6Mt grading 1.14 g/t Au for 643 koz of contained gold at
0.5g/t cut-off grade versus the historic resource of 400koz grading 1.3 g/t at
0.3 g/t cut-off
• The gold mineralisation at G3N and G3S is from surface with
consistent along strike and downdip grade continuity
• The Mineral Resources at the G3N and G3S prospects remain open down
dip with grades encountered so far increasing at depth at G3S
• Future exploration will focus on extending mineralisation at depth
at G3S as well as testing the strong gold anomaly at the G1 prospect area to
the southwest
Chris Eger, Managing Director and CEO commented:
"We are pleased to release an initial JORC resource for the La Debo project in
Côte d'Ivoire. The exploration team has done a great job adding over 250 koz
of contained gold to the historic resource.
The initial MRE of over 640koz of contained gold forms a strong foundation at
La Debo. We are confident of expanding the resources further and will continue
exploration over other prospects on the La Debo permit. Moreover, initial
exploration work is planned on the two newly granted exploration permits that
are only 15 km from the resource announced today.
I would like to highlight that Resolute now has three projects in Côte
d'Ivoire - two exploration (La Debo and ABC) and one development (Doropo) -
all of which have sizeable gold resources outlined. The country is a key
jurisdiction for the Company as we focus on progressing Doropo towards
construction.
Overall, today's result demonstrates Resolute's ability to create value
through exploration. With exploration projects in Côte d'Ivoire, Senegal and
Guinea, Resolute is well-positioned to continue building a diversified
pipeline of high-quality projects."
Côte d'Ivoire Portfolio
As shown on Figure 1, Resolute has three projects in Côte d'Ivoire - Doropo,
ABC and La Debo - which have a combined gold resources of over 7 Moz.
Doropo is a development project in the northeast of the country. An update of
the DFS is underway and is expected to be complete by year-end. Resolute is
awaiting granting of the Exploitation Permit after which construction
activities are expected to commence in H1 2026. First gold at Doropo is
targeted for 2028.
ABC is a greenfield exploration project in the western part of Côte d'Ivoire.
The Project consists of four exploration permits (Farako-Nafana, Kona, Windou
and Gbemanzo) with two further permit applications (Kato and Gouramba).
Currently there is a NI 43-101-compliant Inferred MRE of 2.16 Moz grading 0.9
g/t Au contained within the Kona permit. A first stage RC program of 10,000m
has commenced on the Farako-Nafana permit. On the Kona and Windou permits
15,000m of RC and diamond drilling has commenced.
Figure 1: Resolute's Projects in Côte d'Ivoire
The La Debo project is located 280 km west of Abidjan. In Q4 2024, Resolute
signed a JV agreement and can earn up to 100% of the project.
In 2016, an initial Preliminary Economic Assessment established a NI 43-101
compliant Inferred Mineral Resource of 400 koz at a grade of 1.3 g/t Au (at
0.5 g/t cut-off). After subsequent deeper Diamond drilling in 2022, the
resource was increased but was not reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Figure 2: La Debo Project Permits and Prospect Locations
Drilling
Resolute commenced exploration at La Debo in December 2024 with an RC and
diamond drilling program to confirm and expand the resources over the two main
prospect areas at G3N and G3S. Drilling continued throughout 2025 with a total
of 10,037m of RC drilling and 6,600m diamond drilling completed by Resolute to
date.
In parallel with the drilling program at G3N and G3S, an extensive auger
drilling program has been completed over the south-western half of the La Debo
permit to define targets where surface geochemistry is erratic. This program
has confirmed a strong gold anomaly at the G1 prospect area which will be
drill tested in early 2026.
The RC and diamond drilling program was successful proving the continuity of
the gold mineralisation and confirming the down dip extensions at both G3N and
G3S. Results at G3S were particularly encouraging with excellent down dip
intersections along the strike length. Select results from the program are as
follows.
LBDD0009 - 10.00m @ 4.88g/t from 142.00m
LBDD0024 - 14.00m @ 8.70g/t from 154.00m
LBDD0026 - 9.00m @ 13.40g/t from 155.00m
LBDD0028 - 16.00m @ 4.57g/t from 141.00m
LBRC0034 - 23.00m @ 5.76g/t from 22.00m
LBRC0035 - 5.00m @ 7.29g/t from 120.00m
LBRC0066 - 14.00m @ 4.40g/t from 42.00m
Details of the significant intersections from the drilling program are
attached as Appendix 1.
Figure 3. Prospects G3N and G3S
Mineral Resource Estimate
A Mineral Resources Estimate was undertaken on the G3N and G3S prospects
within the La Debo project area. The G3N and G3S MREs were developed using
wireframe constrained Ordinary Kriged ("OK") estimation methodology, within
Leapfrog Indicator wireframes representing a lower cut-off grade of 0.2 g/t Au
to form the mineralised envelope.
Gold mineralisation varies from approximately 10 to 50m in thickness (measured
across the zone from hanging wall to footwall) with a strike length of 1.6km
for G3N and 1.5km for G3S.
The global Mineral Resource is quoted above a cut-off of 0.5g/t.
La Debo Mineral Resource Estimate
Classification Tonnes Grade (g/t Au) Ounces (Au)
G3N (Inferred) 8,580,000 0.94 259,000
G3S (Inferred) 8,978,000 1.33 384,000
Total 17,559,000 1.14 643,000
Table 1: La Debo Mineral Resources at November 2025 (0.5g/t cut off)
The updated MRE of 643,000 oz is a 60% increase over the 400,000 oz resource
quoted by previous explorers. The G3N and G3S deposits remain open at depth
with G3S drill intersections showing the grade is increasing with depth.
Mineralisation
Gold mineralisation at La Debo is hosted within a sequence of sheared and
metamorphosed turbiditic sediments with some minor volcanics. Gold is
related to shears within the meta-sediments and volcanics and the intensity of
gold mineralisation correlates with quartz-tourmaline-pyrite veins or
disseminated pyrite and veinlets within a shear.
The style of mineralisation is typical of a Birimian orogenic gold deposit.
Geometry of the gold mineralisation is NNE to NE striking and steeply
south-easterly dipping. The zones vary between 3m and 20m wide.
Figure 4. G3S Cross Section
Figure 5. G3N Cross Section
Future Exploration
Future exploration at La Debo will be focused on extending the high-grade
mineralisation intersected at G3S. We plan to commence drilling in the first
half of 2026 to test the G3S extensions. Depending on results, the MRE at La
Debo may be updated in late 2026.
An extensive auger drilling program has been completed over the south-western
half of the La Debo permit to define targets where surface geochemistry is
erratic. This has confirmed a strong gold anomaly at the G1 prospect area
which will be drill tested in early 2026.
On the newly granted Serihio and Okroyou permits early-stage exploration
programs will commence in 2026.
Contact
Resolute Public Relations
Matthias O'Toole-Howes Jos Simson, Tavistock
motoolehowes@resolutemining.com (mailto:motoolehowes@resolutemining.com) resolute@tavistock.co.uk (mailto:resolute@tavistock.co.uk)
+44 207 920 3150
Corporate Brokers
Jennifer Lee, Berenberg
+44 20 3753 3040
Tom Rider, BMO Capital Markets
+44 20 7236 1010
Authorised by Mr Chris Eger, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
Summary of La Debo Resource Parameters
A summary of JORC Table 1 is provided below for compliance regarding the
Mineral Resources reported within and in-line with requirements of ASX Listing
Rule 5.8.1.
Geology and Geological interpretation
Mineralisation is currently interpreted to have a relatively simple geometry,
comprising mineralised shears dipping at approximately 60 degrees to the
east-south-east.
G3N shows an unbroken mineralised zone of approximately 1.5km striking at
030°. The mineralised zone dips at approximately 60° to the ESE and shows a
relatively tabular zone
Sampling and sub-sampling techniques
Reverse circulation samples were collected on 1m intervals by riffle split
(dry) or by scoop (wet) to obtain a 1-3kg sample.
Diamond drill core has been systematically cut lengthwise into half core with
a diamond saw. Half core samples were selected for analysis.
Sample preparation includes oven drying, crushing to 10mm, splitting and
pulverising to 85% passing - 75μm. These preparation techniques are deemed to
be appropriate to the material being sampled.
Reverse circulation and core field duplicates were inserted by the company at
a rate of 1:20 samples.
Sampling, sample preparation and quality control protocols are of industry
standard, with the intention of ensuring an unbiased representative sample was
collected.
Drilling techniques
Drill types used include reverse circulation with face sampling bit and core
drilling using HQ and NQ sized bits.
Classification criteria
Mineral Resources were classified in accordance with the Australasian Code for
the Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves
(JORC, 2012).
The deposit has been classified as Inferred Mineral Resource based on a
combination of quantitative and qualitative criteria which include geologic
continuity, confidence in volume models, data quality, sample spacing, lode
continuity, and estimation parameters (number of informing composites,
estimation pass number, kriging quality parameters, and minimum and average
distance composites). Even where the geological and statistical factors may
support a higher classification, the Inferred status recognised the need for
more comprehensive metallurgical understanding.
The input data is consistent in its coverage of the modelled zones and does
not favour or misrepresent the in-situ mineralisation. The definition of the
mineralised zones is based on a moderate level of geologic understanding from
good quality sample data. Validation of the block model shows good correlation
of the input data to the block estimated grades.
Sample analysis method
All samples were dispatched to MSA Yamoussoukro for sample preparation and
gold analysis by Chrysos Photon Assay. The analytical method is considered
appropriate for the style of mineralisation.
No geophysical tools were used to determine elemental concentrations.
Quality control (QC) procedures included the use of certified standards
(1:40), non-certified sand blanks
(1:40) and reverse circulation/core field duplicates (1:20).
Laboratory quality control data, including laboratory standards, blanks,
duplicates, repeats, grind size results and sample weights were also captured
into the digital database.
Analysis of the QC sample assay results indicates that an acceptable level of
accuracy and precision has been achieved.
Basis for selected cut-off grade
The cut-off grade of 0.5g/t is selected based on this being historically used
to define the Mineral
Resources at similar deposits in terms of grade, scale and proximity to
surface in the Resolute portfolio. Further economic analysis will determine if
a different cut-off grade is more appropriate for future La Debo Mineral
Resource calculations.
Mining and metallurgical methods and other material modifying factors
Basic metallurgical testwork has been performed with more extensive
investigations planned for future sampling campaigns. No mining modifying
factors are yet applied to the MRE.
Competent Persons Statement
The information in this report that relates to the Exploration Results,
Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr
Bruce Mowat, a member of The Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Bruce
Mowat has more than 5 years' experience relevant to the styles of
mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity
which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person, as defined in the
2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results,
Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves" (the JORC Code). Mr Bruce Mowat is a
full-time employee of the Resolute Mining Limited Group and holds equity
securities in the Company. He has consented to the inclusion of the matters in
this report based on his information in the form and context in which it
appears. This information was prepared and disclosed under the JORC Code 2012
except where otherwise noted.
The information in this announcement that relates to the Mineral Resource
estimate has been based on information and supporting documents prepared by Mr
James Woodward, a Competent Person who is a member of The Australasian
Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Woodward is a full-time employee
Resolute Mining Limited Group and has sufficient experience relevant to the
style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the
activity which has been undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person. Mr
Woodward confirms that the Mineral Resource estimate is based on information
in the supporting documents and consents to the inclusion in the report of the
Mineral Resource estimate and related content based on the information in the
form and context in which it appears.
Cautionary Statement about Forward-Looking Statements
This announcement contains certain "forward-looking statements" including
statements regarding our intent, belief or current expectations with respect
to Resolute's business and operations, market conditions, results of
operations and financial condition, and risk management practices. The words
"likely", "expect", "aim", "should", "could", "may", "anticipate", "predict",
"believe", "plan", "forecast" and other similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. Indications of, and guidance on, future
earnings, anticipated production, life of mine and financial position and
performance are also forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors
that may cause Resolute's actual results, performance and achievements or
industry results to differ materially from any future results, performance or
achievements, or industry results, expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements. Relevant factors may include (but are not limited
to) changes in commodity prices, foreign exchange fluctuations and general
economic conditions, increased costs and demand for production inputs, the
speculative nature of exploration and project development, including the risks
of obtaining necessary licences and permits and diminishing quantities or
grades of reserves, political and social risks, changes to the regulatory
framework within which Resolute operates or may in the future operate,
environmental conditions including extreme weather conditions, recruitment and
retention of personnel, industrial relations issues and litigation.
Forward-looking statements are based on Resolute's good faith assumptions as
to the financial, market, regulatory and other relevant environments that will
exist and affect Resolute's business and operations in the future. Resolute
does not give any assurance that the assumptions will prove to be correct.
There may be other factors that could cause actual results or events not to be
as anticipated, and many events are beyond the reasonable control of Resolute.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements, particularly in the current economic climate with the significant
volatility, uncertainty and disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Forward-looking statements in this document speak only at the date of issue.
Except as required by applicable laws or regulations, Resolute does not
undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any of the
forward-looking statements or to advise of any change in assumptions on which
any such statement is based. Except for statutory liability which cannot be
excluded, each of Resolute, its officers, employees and advisors expressly
disclaim any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the material
contained in these forward-looking statements and excludes all liability
whatsoever (including in negligence) for any loss or damage which may be
suffered by any person as a consequence of any information in forward-looking
statements or any error or omission.
Appendix 1: Recent Drilling Results
La Debo
Hole_ID North (WGS) East (WGS) RL Dip Azi EOH From To Width Au
(m) (WGS) (m) (m) (m) (m) (g/t)
LBDD0008 669911 815746 227 -61 316 215 173 179 6 5.87
LBDD0009 670243 815913 216 -61 317 215 142 152 10 4.88
LBDD0013 664961 815388 226 -60 314 227 169 188 19 2.57
LBDD0018 665446 815681 219 -59 316 241.55 183 208 25 1.22
LBDD0020 665550 815708 220 -59 316 203 134 149 15 3.28
LBDD0020 665550 815708 220 -59 316 203 156 167 11 3.02
LBDD0021 665451 815611 214 -60 317 170.4 115 139 24 2.76
LBDD0022 665752 815874 225 -61 316 208.1 146 161 15 3.97
LBDD0023 665567 815770 224 -60 316 252.1 198 203 5 5.19
LBDD0024 665781 815914 221 -59 315 213 154 168 14 8.7
LBDD0025 665859 815970 214 -61 314 204 140 152 12 2.61
LBDD0026 665898 816032 207 -60 315 230 155 164 9 13.4
LBDD0027 665699 815854 227 -60 317 225 164 177 13 2.38
LBDD0028 665829 815943 218 -60 315 212 141 157 16 4.57
LBDD0029 664975 815442 229 -61 316 255 199 213 14 3.37
LBDD0030 664929 815422 228 -61 316 281 224 230 6 4.31
LBRC0010 669598 815470 218 -60 315 144 111 120 9 3.91
LBRC0030 669975 815611 223 -60 317 78 11 40 29 1.17
LBRC0034 670361 815850 211 -60 315 100 22 45 23 5.76
LBRC0035 670291 815916 212 -61 315 200 120 125 5 7.29
LBRC0038 670655 816041 215 -60 316 110 31 63 32 0.94
LBRC0060 664969 815259 224 -60 313 140 63 82 19 1.76
LBRC0061 664925 815262 228 -61 312 180 134 137 3 8.74
LBRC0066 665822 815800 221 -61 314 72 42 56 14 4.4
LDD016 665786 815834 218 -60 318 145.7 94.4 120.4 26 1.49
LDD023 665001 815350 227 -60 314 183.2 122 130 8 3.39
LDD024 664934 815295 236 -61 312 195.2 126 151.5 25.5 1.4
LDD034 670558 816081 208 -59 316 171.2 117.3 132.8 15.5 1.62
LDD039 670229 815781 228 -61 317 105.3 65 73 8 5.81
LDD08 670591 816048 211 -60 319 120.4 77 104 27 0.93
LDD10 670280 815797 226 -61 319 81.4 18.6 36.3 17.7 2.38
LDD11 665582 815669 214 -61 318 156.4 80 92 12 2.57
LRC002a 664963 815164 239 -60 135 68 61 68 7 17.27
LRC002b 664965 815166 239 -60 135 100 68 92 24 9.68
LRC005 665119 815297 223 -60 135 119 101 119 18 3.54
LRC010 665655 815609 225 -60 135 100 26 48 22 5.38
LRC014 665964 815863 213 -60 135 106 57 106 49 2.49
LRC015 665756 815783 223 -60 315 100 83 96 13 2.3
LRC024 665467 815514 213 -60 315 85 4 32 28 1.42
LRC026 670789 816054 206 -60 135 69 9 39 30 1.56
LRC031 670646 815992 217 -60 135 93 17 40 23 4.96
LRC031 670646 815992 217 -60 135 93 46 93 47 1.6
LRC032 670611 816032 213 -60 315 73 47 66 19 1.56
LRC035 670257 815821 225 -60 315 112 46 51 5 5.04
LRC035 670257 815821 225 -60 315 112 62 88 26 1.85
LRC040 669910 815602 219 -60 315 107 50 61 11 10.19
LRC046 651736 804767 201 -60 320 100 11 51 40 0.98
LRC083 670305 815849 218 -60 315 114 62 79 17 2.72
LRC084 670329 815826 217 -60 315 78 6 33 27 1.09
LRC095 669656 815411 221 -60 315 120 38 51 13 2.03
LRC101 665704 815701 224 -60 315 72 24 45 21 1.75
LRC103 665512 815618 215 -60 315 150 73 90 17 1.53
LRC106 665563 815570 220 -60 315 78 11 30 19 1.37
LRC110 665816 815877 216 -60 315 144 101 114 13 2.05
LRC111 665843 815849 214 -60 315 114 65 85 20 1.63
LRC112 665861 815831 213 -60 315 72 32 44 12 2.18
LRC116 664981 815302 230 -60 315 150 88 108 20 1.56
LRC120 664878 815187 237 -60 315 150 36 57 21 1.3
LRC121 664896 815169 236 -60 315 120 0 30 30 2.74
LRC122 664909 815156 235 -60 315 114 0 5 5 10.17
LRC123 664933 815134 232 -60 315 72 7 14 7 13.39
LRC127 670714 816038 216 -60 315 102 1 20 19 1.7
LRC131 670633 816005 216 -60 315 50 1 20 19 1.79
LRC134 670396 815866 206 -60 315 66 9 19 10 2.56
LRC146 664942 815188 238 -60 315 108 43 46 3 9.04
LRC147 664917 815212 241 -60 315 114 28 71 43 1.05
LRC151 665245 815406 217 -60 315 121 8 15 7 6.54
LRC156 665798 815752 218 -60 315 70 1 23 22 3.17
LRC158 665880 815811 215 -60 315 50 0 22 22 1.27
LRC159 665940 815886 214 -60 315 61 13 42 29 2.36
LRC160 665997 815932 213 -60 315 73 18 37 19 3.36
LRC164 665608 815651 216 -60 315 139 32 64 32 0.96
LRC172 665916 815854 214 -60 315 42 13 37 24 2.07
LRC173 665738 815744 223 -60 315 72 46 71 25 1.09
LRC174 665651 815696 221 -60 315 96 69 81 12 2.81
LRC183 664965 815226 240 -60 315 84 34 63 29 1.88
LRC203 659975 806201 228 -60 315 151 62 90 28 1.08
Notes to Accompany Table:
• Grid coordinates are WGS84 Zone 29 North
• RC intervals are sampled every 1m by dry riffle splitting or
scoop to provide a 2-3kg sample
• Diamond core are sampled every 1m by cutting the core in half to
provide a 2-4kg sample
• Cut-off grade for reporting of intercepts is >0.5g/t Au with
a maximum of 3m consecutive internal dilution included within the intercept;
only intercepts >=3m and >25 gram x metres are reported
• Recent drill samples are analysed for gold by MSA Labs CPA-Au1
500g sample gamma ray analysis by photon assay instrument whilst prior drill
programs included fire assay aas techniques
La Debo
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
CRITERIA JORC CODE EXPLANATION COMMENTARY
Sampling techniques Sampling has been by diamond drill coring and reverse circulation chip.
· Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or Diamond core has been geologically logged and sampled to geological contacts
specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the with nominal sample lengths between 0.3m and 4.5m (most commonly 1m). Core
minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF selected for assay is systematically cut lengthwise into half core by diamond
instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad blade rock saw, numbered and bagged before dispatch to the laboratory for
meaning of sampling. analysis.
· Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity All core is photographed, wet and dry.
and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.
Reverse circulation chips are geologically logged and sampled on regular
· Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to lengths of 1m. Chip material selected for assay is systematically divided to a
the Public Report. 1/8 proportion using a rotary splitter attached to the cyclone sample recovery
system, numbered and bagged before dispatch to the laboratory for analysis.
· In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be
relatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m
samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire
assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there
is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of
detailed information.
Drilling techniques Diamond core drilling with standard inner tubes. HQ diameter to target depth
where possible with some smaller NQ intervals as tails. Core is marked and
· Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, oriented.
rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter,
triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other Reverse Circulation drilling with 4" or 4.5" hammer and 4" rod string to
type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.). target depth.
Drill sample recovery Diamond core recoveries are measured in the core trays and recorded as
recovered metres and recovered % as part of the geological logging process.
· Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries
and results assessed. RC recoveries are monitored by chip sample weight recording. Sample weights
have been analysed for cyclicity with no relationship between sample weight
· Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure and depth noted.
representative nature of the samples.
· Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and
whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.
Logging Diamond core has been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of
detail to support appropriate classification and reporting of a Mineral
· Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and Resource.
geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral
Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. Reverse circulation chip samples have been geologically logged to a level of
detail to support appropriate classification and reporting of a Mineral
· Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or Resource.
costean, channel, etc.) photography.
Total length of DD logged is 6,804m. Total length of RC logged is 9,849m.
· The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections
logged.
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation Historic core has been systematically cut lengthwise into half core with a
diamond saw.
· If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core
taken. RC samples representing a 1/8 split are taken directly from the rig mounted
cyclone by rotary splitter, sample weight is recorded, sample is bagged in pre
· If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and numbered plastic and sample tickets are inserted and bag is sealed for
whether sampled wet or dry. transport to preparation facility.
· For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of Generally, one of each of the two control samples (blank or CRM standard) is
the sample preparation technique. inserted into the sample stream every tenth sample. An industry standard,
documented process of sample mark-up, core splitting, bagging and ticketing
· Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to and recording is in place at the LaDebo site.
maximise representivity of samples.
All samples were submitted to external certified analytical laboratory, MSALAB
· Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in Yamoussoukro. The 3kg sample were considered appropriate samples size for
in situ material collected, including for instance results for field Photon Assays analysis.
duplicate/second-half sampling.
MSA prepares the samples by weighing, drying, and crushing the entire samples
· Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the to >70% passing 2mm, then prepared for PhotonAssay.
material being sampled.
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests Au assays are determined by Chrysos Photon assay at MSA labs in Yamoussoukro.
Laboratory and assay procedures are appropriate for Mineral Resource
· The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and estimation.
laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or
total. QAQC consisted of standards, blanks and laboratory duplicates (both coarse and
pulp). The QAQC sample results showed acceptable levels of accuracy and
· For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, precision.
etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument
make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their The assay data is considered to be suitable for Mineral Resource estimation.
derivation, etc.
· Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards,
blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels
of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.
Verification of sampling and assaying All aspects of the core sampling, assay procedures and QA/QC program have been
reviewed and were judged to be suitable for use in the estimation of Mineral
· The verification of significant intersections by either independent Resources.
or alternative company personnel.
Drill hole assay result data has been checked against the original hardcopy
· The use of twinned holes. laboratory assay reports for a representative number of holes.
· Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data Below detection limit values (negatives) have been replaced by background
verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. values.
· Discuss any adjustment to assay data. Un-sampled intervals have been retained as un-sampled (null or blank). All of
these intervals occur within the waste domain and have no material impact on
the estimate.
Location of data points Drill holes have been surveyed by contractor, SEMS Exploration staff using a
DGPS.
· Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar
and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Downhole surveys were undertaken by the drilling contractor using a
Mineral Resource estimation. ReflexSprintIQ tool with a reading taken every 30m downhole.
· Specification of the grid system used. Grid system is based on the UTM29N grid on the WGS84 (northern hemisphere)
projection.
· Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
A topographic surface has been generated from the satellite images of the
area.
Data spacing and distribution Data spacing is Generally 50x50m. This spacing is adequate to determine the
geological and grade continuity for reporting of a Mineral Resources.
· Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.
Drill samples were composited to 1m for use in the estimate.
· Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to
establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the
Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications
applied.
· Whether sample compositing has been applied.
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure Geological structures are interpreted to be steeply-dipping to the
south-southeast. Drilling intersects structures from the north and south
· Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of sides, generally dipping -60⁰ below horizontal, with azimuths at
possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the approximately 315⁰.
deposit type.
Drill orientation was designed perpendicular to the modelled mineralisation
· If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the dipped at about 60⁰ to the south-southeast.
orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a
sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. The drilling orientation is adequate for a non-biased assessment of the
orebody with respect to interpreted structures and interpreted controls on
mineralisation.
Sample security Labelling and submission of samples complies with industry standard.
· The measures taken to ensure sample security.
Audits or reviews The competent person audited the sample preparation laboratory in 2025. No
material issues were found.
· The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and
data.
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
CRITERIA JORC CODE EXPLANATION COMMENTARY
Mineral tenement and land tenure status The LaDebo Permit is held by Jofema Mineral Resources. Toro Gold Limited
is in a joint Venture with Jofema with Toro being the manager and sole funder
· Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including of the joint Venture. Toro Gold Limited is a company controlled by resolute
agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, Limited. The permit is in good standing.
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites,
wilderness or national park and environmental settings.
· The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with
any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
Exploration done by other parties Past exploration has been performed by Jofema with previous partners. Jofema
had undertaken soil geochemistry, surface mapping, on the entire Research
· Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. Permit. Pitting, Trenching, regional Auger drilling and RAB drilling have
identified gold anomalism which Jofema followed up with Diamond and Reverse
Circulation drilling
Geology Mineralisation is currently interpreted to be a standard Birimian orogenic
gold deposit style. Gold is related to shears within meta-sediments and
· Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. volcanics. Intensity of gold mineralisation appears to correlate with the
intensity quartz-tourmaline-pyrite veins or disseminated pyrite and veinlets
within a shear.
Geometry of the gold mineralisation is generally NNE to NE striking and
steeply south-easterly dipping. The zones vary between 3m and 20m wide.
Drill hole Information Easting, Northing and RL of the drill hole collars are based on the UTM29N
grid on the WGS84 (northern hemisphere) projection.
· A summary of all information material to the understanding of the
exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for The MRE has used drill hole collar RL derived from the topographical surface.
all Material drill holes:
Dip is the inclination of the hole from the horizontal. For example, a
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar vertically down drilled hole from the surface is -90°. Azimuth is reported in
degrees as the grid direction toward which the hole is drilled.
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of
the drill hole collar Down hole length of the hole is the distance from the surface to the end of
the hole, as measured along the drill trace. Intersection depth is the
o dip and azimuth of the hole distance down the hole as measured along the drill trace. Intersection width
is the downhole distance of an intersection as measured along the drill trace.
o down hole length and interception depth
Drill hole length is the distance from the surface to the end of the hole, as
o Whole length. measured along the drill trace.
· If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that
the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why
this is
the case.
Data aggregation methods Samples intervals in this document are all 1m and are not composited in the
drill intersections.
· In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques,
maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and Cut-off grade for reporting is >= 0.5g/t Au with maximum 3m consecutive
cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. interval dilution.
· Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade Top-cuts have not been used in the drill intersections.
results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations The assay intervals are reported as down hole length as the true width
should be shown in detail. variable is not known.
· The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values Gold assays are rounded to two decimal places.
should be clearly stated.
No metal equivalent reporting is used or applied.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths The intersection width is measured down the hole trace and may not be the true
width.
· These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of
Exploration Results. All drill results are downhole intervals only due to the variable orientation
of the mineralisation.
· If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill
hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.
· If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported,
there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. 'down hole length, true
width not known').
Diagrams A plan view is contained within this document. New cross-sectional
interpretations are included.
· Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of
intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported
These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
locations and appropriate sectional views.
Balanced reporting All significant assay results from Resolute work are provided in this report.
· Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not The report is considered balanced and provided in context.
practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or
widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration
Results.
Other substantive exploration data No other exploration data is considered meaningful and material to this
document.
· Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be
reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical
survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical
and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
Further work Further regional exploration work including Auger drilling and geological
mapping is underway over the rest of the permit to identified additional RC
· The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for and DD drill targets for additional resources. Geophysical exploration will be
lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). planned as part of the future exploration of the permit.
· Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions,
including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas,
provided this information is not commercially sensitive.
Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources
CRITERIA JORC CODE EXPLANATION COMMENTARY
Database Data has been compiled into a relational SQL database which includes
integrity
validation protocols which preclude the loading of erroneous data. The data is
· Measures taken to ensure that data has not been corrupted by, for managed using the DataShed© (MaxGeo) drill hole management software.
example, transcription or keying errors, between its initial collection and Validation checks are conducted using SQL and DataShed© relational database
its use for Mineral Resource estimation purposes. standards. Data has also been checked against original hard copies for 100% of
the data, and where possible, loaded from original data sources.
· Data validation procedures used.
Resolute completed the following basic validation checks on the data supplied
prior to resource estimation:
· Drill holes with overlapping sample intervals.
· Sample intervals with no assay data or duplicate records.
· Assay grade ranges.
· Collar coordinate ranges.
· Valid hole orientation data.
No significant issues were identified in the data.
Site visits Mr. James Woodward, a full-time employee of Resolute Mining Limited and a
Member of the AUSIMM, consents to act as the Competent Person (CP) for this
· Comment on any site visits undertaken by the Competent Person and the release. The CP visited the project site in September 2025. This included
outcome of those visits. company offices, core processing and sample storage facilities and several
drill hole sites. An audit of the 3(rd) party lab facility was also made. In
· If no site visits have been undertaken indicate why this the opinion of the CP, all processes are well managed and executed to a good
is the case. standard. No site related factors were identified that might materially reduce
the validity of the input data to the Mineral Resource Estimate.
Geological interpretation
· Confidence in (or conversely, the uncertainty of) the geological The geological logging data for key features coincident with mineralisation
interpretation of the mineral deposit. were used to validate the mineralisation model. Overall, the geology and
mineralisation data correlate as expected according to the prevailing
· Nature of the data used and of any assumptions made. geological interpretation.
· The effect, if any, of alternative interpretations on Mineral The mineralised volume has been constructed a lower cut-off of 0.2 g/t Au.
Resource estimation. For G3N and the southern domain of G3S, the mineralised domains were modelled
using an Indicator Interpolant method in Leapfrog software, guided by a
· The use of geology in guiding and controlling Mineral Resource sectional interpretation of the trend of mineralisation. The northern domain
estimation. of G3S was modelled using the Vein Modelling workflow in Leapfrog. Visual
checks of the mineralisation model against assay data saw iterative
· The factors affecting continuity both of grade and geology. adjustments to avoid overstating volume in areas of lower sample support.
There is a moderate level of confidence in the interpretation of the
mineralised zones.
The factors affecting continuity of both grade and geology are likely to be
associated with local complexity related to the understanding of fluid
pathways in the host rock. Knowledge of these is somewhat limited with the
current spacing of information.
Dimensions Gold mineralisation has been estimated across two separate zones, locally
called G3N and G3S.
· The extent and variability of the Mineral Resource expressed as
length (along strike or otherwise), plan width, and depth below surface to the G3N shows an unbroken mineralised zone of approximately 1.5km striking at
upper and lower limits of the Mineral Resource. 030°. The mineralised zone dips at approximately 60° to the ESE and shows a
relatively tabular zone which anastomoses into two zones at the southern
extent. Thickness varies from approximately 10 to 20m per zone along the
strike length, measured across the zones from hangingwall to footwall.
Mineralisation is defined to approximately 240m vertical depth from the
topography and is encountered from surface. The mineralisation is apparently
open to depth.
G3S shows a similar mineralised strike length of approximately 1.5km, striking
at 040°, albeit broken into northern and southern domains, separated by a
200m zone of minor anomalism not yet included in a coherent mineralised
domain. The northern domain consists of two stacked tabular zones, dipping at
approximately 65° to the SE, with a combined thickness of up to 30m measured
across the zones from hangingwall to footwall. The southern domain is modelled
as a single mostly tabular zone, also dipping approximately 65° to the SE,
with a thickness up to 30m measured across the zone. Mineralisation is defined
to approximately 220m vertical depth from the topography and is encountered
from surface. The mineralisation is apparently open to depth.
Estimation and modelling techniques Estimation of gold grade used an Ordinary Kriging (OK) workflow.
Mineralisation was constrained using wireframes constructed in Leapfrog Geo at
· The nature and appropriateness of the estimation technique(s) applied a lower cut-off grade of 0.2g/t. These wireframes defined domain codes for
and key assumptions, including treatment of extreme grade values, domaining, estimation. Drillholes were flagged with the domain code and composited using
interpolation parameters and maximum distance of extrapolation from data the domain code to segregate the data.
points. If a computer assisted estimation method was chosen include a
description of computer software and parameters used. Domain boundary analysis identified hard boundaries were appropriate for all
domains.
· The availability of check estimates, previous estimates and/or mine
production records and whether the Mineral Resource estimate takes appropriate Drillholes were composited to 1m intervals using Leapfrog Geo 2025.1 with
account of such data. residual lengths distributed evenly across all composites within the domain.
· The assumptions made regarding recovery of by- products. The influence of extreme gold assays was limited by top-cutting assays across
all domains. Top-cuts were determined using a combination of log probability,
· Estimation of deleterious elements or other non-grade variables of log histogram, and mean variance plots for each estimated domain and applied
economic significance (e.g. sulphur for acid mine drainage characterization). to the composites on a domain-by-domain basis.
· In the case of block model interpolation, the block size in relation Variography was undertaken on a domain-by-domain basis in Gaussian space,
to the average sample spacing and the search employed. using Supervisor software, v9. Back transformed variograms are applied to the
estimate.
· In the case of block model interpolation, the block size in relation
to the average sample spacing and the search employed. Drillhole data spacing averages 50m x 50m, with consistent spatial coverage
across the prospects.
· Any assumptions behind modelling of selective mining units.
The block model parent block size is 25m (X) by 25m (Y) by 10m (Z) with up to
· Any assumptions about correlation between variables. 16 sub-blocks per parent block in the X, Y and Z directions. The estimate was
performed at the parent block scale, and sub-blocks assigned the grade of the
· Description of how the geological interpretation was used to control relevant parent block. The parent block size is considered appropriate for the
the resource estimates. drillhole spacing throughout the deposit, and the sub-blocking results in
>99% of the domain volume replicated. The estimate is not localised to an
· Discussion of basis for using or not using grade cutting or capping. assumed SMU scale.
· The process of validation, the checking process used, the comparison Grade estimation used the following parameters:
of model data to drill hole data, and use of reconciliation data if available.
G3N:
Ø Pass 1 estimation has been undertaken using a minimum of 6 and maximum of
20 sample composites, using a search ellipsoid of 33m x 24m x 13m (equal to
variogram range) with the major direction aligned down-dip. Max samples per
drill hole = 2
Ø Pass 2: estimation required a minimum of 6 samples and a larger search of
45m x 35m x 15m. Max samples per drill hole = 2
Ø Pass 3: estimation required a minimum of 4 samples and a larger search of
100m x 100m x 30m. No max samples per drill hole.
G3S:
Ø Northern domain; Pass 1 used a minimum of 8 and maximum of 20 samples
within an ellipse at 42m x 36m x 11 (60% of the variogram range). A second
pass used a minimum of 6 samples, maximum of 20 and search 64m x 54m x 16m
(equal to variogram ranges). A 3(rd) pass used a broader search of 95m x 80m
x 25m.
Ø Southern domain; Pass 1 used a minimum of 10 and maximum of 20 samples
within an ellipse of 60m x 40m x 6m. A second Pass used a minimum of 6
samples, 6 and search of 60m x 40m x 6m. Pass 3 used minimum of 4 and maximum
of 12 samples and a broader search of 90m x 60m x 15m.
The mineral resource estimate has been validated using visual validation
tools, mean grade comparisons between the block model and declustered
composite grade means, and swath plots comparing the input composite grades
and the estimated block model grades by Northing, Easting, and RL. The
estimate is considered an appropriate representation of the volume and grade
distribution of the gold mineralisation.
Leapfrog Geo 2025.1and Datamine Supervisor v9 software were used for the
geostatistical analysis, estimation and validation processes.
No by-product recoveries were considered, and gold grade was the only
estimated variable.
Moisture Tonnages are estimated as dry tonnes.
· Whether the tonnages are estimated on a dry basis or with natural
moisture, and the method of determination of the moisture content.
Cut-off parameters A nominal lower cut-off grade of 0.2g/t Au was used to define the mineralised
domains to encompass the complete mineralised distribution and produce a model
· The basis of the adopted cut-off grade(s) or quality that reduces the risk of conditional bias that could be introduced where the
parameters applied. constraining interpretation and data selection is based on a significantly
higher grade than the natural geological grade
cut-off.
The cut-off grade for reporting (above 0.5g/t Au) is assumed to be the likely
cut-off grade for mining a deposit of similar grade, dimensions and proximity
to surface, as compared to other prospects and projects in the Resolute
portfolio. A more detailed economic analysis may alter the appropriate cut-off
parameters as the MRE is refined.
Mining factors or assumptions The shallow occurrence of the mineralisation and average grade profile suggest
that eventual extraction of the resources by open pit mining methods is a
· Assumptions made regarding possible mining methods, minimum mining reasonable assumption. At this stage, no detailed open pit optimisation work
dimensions and internal (or, if applicable, external) mining dilution. has been completed.
It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable The domaining approach incorporates an amount of edge dilution into the blocks
prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider potential mining of the model. No further steps to account of mining loss / dilution have yet
methods, but the assumptions made regarding mining methods and parameters when been included.
estimating Mineral Resources may not always be rigorous. Where this is the
case, this should be reported with an explanation of the basis of the mining
assumptions made.
Metallurgical factors or assumptions The assumption is made that the Mineral Resource displays metallurgical
properties amenable to the eventual economic extraction of gold. No specific
· The basis for assumptions or predictions regarding metallurgical metallurgical test work has yet been carried out.
amenability. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining
reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider potential
metallurgical methods, but the assumptions regarding metallurgical treatment
processes and parameters made when reporting Mineral Resources may not always
be rigorous. Where this is the case, this should be reported with an
explanation of the basis of the metallurgical assumptions made.
Environmental factors or assumptions The project area resides in an area of established agriculture, including
crops such as rubber, cocoa, coffee and plantains. Future mining would require
· Assumptions made regarding possible waste and process residue community engagement and compensation for lost crops. This process is well
disposal options. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining established and understood, with current exploration activities involving
reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider the regular community engagement by local specialists employed by the company. The
potential environmental impacts of the mining and processing operation. While likely scope of community related factors is not deemed a material risk to
at this stage the determination of potential environmental impacts, eventual development of the project.
particularly for a green fields project, may not always be well advanced, the
status of early consideration of these potential environmental impacts should
be reported. Where these aspects have not been considered this should be
reported with an explanation of the environmental assumptions made.
Bulk density Specific gravity values were measured based on the Archimedean Principle using
the immersion method for individual core samples. A total of 1,810
· Whether assumed or determined. If assumed, the basis for the measurements were available for the G3N zone and 1,273 for G3S. This data has
assumptions. If determined, the method used, whether wet or dry, the frequency been used as the basis of the block model bulk density.
of the measurements, the nature, size and representativeness of the samples.
No relationship between density and gold content was established.
· The bulk density for bulk material must have been measured by methods
that adequately account for void spaces (vugs, porosity, etc), moisture and An average bulk density was applied to each modelled oxidation zone, where
differences between rock and alteration zones within the deposit. 1.8t/m(3) was assigned to the oxidised zone, 2.2t/m(3) assigned to
transitional rock and 2.7t/m(3) was assigned to fresh rock.
· Discuss assumptions for bulk density estimates used in the evaluation
process of the different materials.
Classification The entire Mineral Resource is currently classified as Inferred based on the
confidence in the continuity of geology and mineralisation and
· The basis for the classification of the Mineral Resources into quality/confidence in the estimation and quality of assay data and bulk
varying confidence categories. density data.
· Whether appropriate account has been taken of all relevant factors The Mineral Resource estimate appropriately reflects the Competent Person's
(i.e. relative confidence in tonnage/grade estimations, reliability of input view of the deposit.
data, confidence in continuity of geology
and metal values, quality, quantity and distribution of the data).
· Whether the result appropriately reflects the Competent Person's view
of the deposit.
Audits or reviews No external reviews have been completed.
· The results of any audits or reviews of Mineral
· Resource estimates.
Discussion of relative accuracy/ confidence The Mineral Resource Estimate has been classified based on the quality of the
data collected, the density of the data, the confidence of the geologic and
· Where appropriate a statement of the relative accuracy and confidence mineralisation models, and the grade estimation quality. No relative
level in the Mineral Resource estimate using an approach or procedure deemed statistical or geostatistical confidence or risk measure has been applied.
appropriate by the Competent Person. For example, the application of
statistical or geostatistical procedures to quantify the relative accuracy of In a qualitative sense, the relative accuracy and confidence of the Mineral
the resource within stated confidence limits, or, if such an approach is not Resource Estimate is considered moderate, reflecting the current spacing of
deemed appropriate, a qualitative discussion of the factors that could affect information. The expectation is that broad properties such as global volume,
the relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate. shape and extent of mineralisation will remain consistent with additional
(closer spaced) data. But the grade distribution may improve or decline at a
· The statement should specify whether it relates to global or local local scale. This is consistent with the Inferred classification applied to
estimates, and, if local, state the relevant tonnages, which should be the MRE at this stage.
relevant to technical and economic evaluation. Documentation should include
assumptions made and the procedures used. No production data is available for comparison.
· These statements of relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate
should be compared with production data, where available.
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
. END DRLFIFILLALTLIE
Copyright 2019 Regulatory News Service, all rights reservedRecent news on Resolute Mining
See all newsREG - Resolute Mining Ltd - Initial Mineral Resource at La Debo
AnnouncementREG - Resolute Mining Ltd - Appendix 3Y - Adrienne Parker
AnnouncementREG - Resolute Mining Ltd - Mali Update
AnnouncementREG - Resolute Mining Ltd - September 2025 Quarterly Presentation
AnnouncementREG - Resolute Mining Ltd - September 2025 Quarterly Activities Report
Announcement