June 2025 Quarterly Activities Report
RNS Number : 8916S
Resolute Mining Limited
29 July 2025
29 July 2025
Q2 2025 Activities Report
For the Quarter ending 30 June 2025 ('Q2', 'June Quarter' or 'the Quarter')
Highlights
· Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) increased to 2.02 from 1.86 at the end of June 2025 with six recordable injuries during the Quarter
· Appointment of Gavin Harris as Chief Operating Officer effective from 1 July 2025 and Rob Cicchini as Project Director of the Doropo Project effective from 15 July 2025
· Group gold production of 75,962 ounces (oz) (Q1 2025: 75,497oz) similar to Q1 with strong performance at Mako offsetting lower production at Syama
· All-In Sustaining Costs (AISC) of $1,668/oz (Q1 2025: $1,708/oz) in line with Group guidance
· Quarterly gold sales of 80,797oz at an average realised price of $3,261/oz (Q1 2025: 64,322oz at $2,840/oz)
· Quarterly Capital Expenditure (excluding exploration) of $17.6 million (Q1 2025: $24.9 million) in line with expectations consisting of $9.6 million non-sustaining $8.0 million sustaining capital
· Quarterly operating cash flow generation of $84.6 million (Q1 2025: $75.4 million) (operating cash flow, before capital expenditure, exploration and working capital) due to higher realised gold price and gold ounces sold
· Net cash of $110.4 million (Q1 2025: $100.3 million), including cash and bullion of $157.3 million and drawn overdraft balances of $47.0 million; Group available liquidity of $212.4 million following $25.0 million payment for acquisition of Doropo and ABC Projects on 1 May 2025
· Unaudited H1 2025 EBITDA of approximately $211.2 million and cash generation of $97.9 million before interest and debt payments and working capital movements
· Continued progress in Senegal to extend the Mako Mine with exploration success at adjacent Tomboronkoto and Bantaco Projects
· Acquisition of development-stage Doropo Gold Project and exploration-stage ABC Project in Côte d'Ivoire from AngloGold Ashanti Plc which closed on 1 May 2025
· Initial Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) at Bantaco Project totalling approximately 266koz of contained gold comprising Bantaco West prospect of 5.8Mt grading 0.97 g/t Au for 179koz, and Bantaco South prospect of 2.2Mt grading 1.2g/t Au for 87koz
· Remain on track for production guidance of 275-300 koz at a Group AISC of $1,650 - 1,750/oz
· Capital expenditure guidance ($109 - 126 million) is on track
Note: Unless otherwise stated, all dollar figures are United States dollars ($).
Resolute Mining Limited (Resolute, the Company or the Group) (ASX/LSE: RSG), the Africa-focused gold miner, is pleased to present its Quarterly Activities Report for the period ended 30 June 2025.
Chris Eger, Chief Executive Officer, commented,
"I am pleased to report that Resolute has continued to deliver in Q2, including advancing our strategic growth initiatives at both Syama and Mako, diversifying the asset base with the acquisition of Doropo and generating robust operating results at our operations, thereby generating strong cash flow with an increase in the net cash position to over $110 million.
I am very happy with our operating results at Mako in Senegal which continues to exceed expectations in terms of operations and progress on life extension initiatives. In Mali we continue to see supply chain disruptions as a result of a complicated political landscape which impacted gold production. Both sites have demonstrated good cost discipline, and we are continuing our work on further cost efficiencies in a number of areas including working capital. As a result, we remain on target for Group production and cost guidance.
During the Quarter we closed the acquisition of the both the Doropo and ABC Projects from AngloGold Ashanti marking the beginning of a new chapter for Resolute. These high-quality assets provide a foundation for significant future growth as well as further diversification into Côte d'Ivoire, a well-regarded and established mining jurisdiction that leverages our existing presence in the region. The licensing process is underway, and our discussions with the local government and Prime Minister have been constructive and engaging, including how the development of Doropo can meaningfully contribute to the socioeconomic advancement of the region. We look forward to continuing these discussions with the aim of delivering value for all stakeholders.
Another key development to highlight is the initial MRE at the Bantaco Project in Senegal where over 266koz of Inferred gold resources have been estimated across both the Bantaco West and South Prospects. This is a crucial step in the potential extension of the Mako operations. It creates additional optionality and flexibility for Resolute with favourable development conditions including our established stakeholder relationships in the region and proximity to existing mining infrastructure.
Finally, this Quarter saw a small increase in our Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR). Safety remains an upmost priority, and we will continue to learn from incidents to implement more robust controls to push the Company above industry standards."
Webcast and Conference Call
Resolute will host a conference call for investors, analysts, and media on 29 July 2025, to discuss the Company's Quarterly Activities Report for the period ending 30 June 2025. This call will conclude with a question-and-answer session.
Conference Call: 6:00pm (AEST, Sydney) / 9:00am (BST, London)
Webcast registration link: https://brrmedia.news/RSG_Q2_2025
Those wishing to ask questions as part of the Q&A should use the conference call facility (please join five minutes prior to the start time).
Conference call details:
| Dial in number(s) | USA Toll Free: 866 580 3963 Sydney: +61 (0) 2 8014 9383 South Africa Toll Free: 0 800 980 512 UK-Wide: +44 (0) 33 0551 0200 UK Toll Free: 0808 109 0700 |
| Password (if prompted) | Quote Resolute Mining Q2 2025 when prompted by the operator |
| Group Summary | Units | June 2025 Quarter | March 2025 Quarter | H1 2025 YTD | H1 2024 YTD |
| Mining | |||||
| Ore Mined | t | 1,374,517 | 1,345,796 | 2,720,313 | 3,322,848 |
| Mined Grade | g/t | 2.03 | 1.97 | 2.00 | 2.08 |
| Processing | |||||
| Ore Processed | t | 1,557,787 | 1,550,187 | 3,107,974 | 2,976,436 |
| Processed Grade | g/t | 1.82 | 1.79 | 1.80 | 2.07 |
| Recovery | % | 84 | 84 | 84 | 86 |
| Gold Poured | oz | 75,962 | 75,497 | 151,460 | 167,140 |
| Sales | |||||
| Gold Sold | oz | 80,797 | 64,322 | 145,120 | 157,321 |
| Average Realised Price | $/oz | 3,261 | 2,840 | 3,076 | 2,170 |
| Financials | |||||
| Total Capital Expenditure | $m | 17.6 | 24.9 | 42.4 | 44.3 |
| Net Cash | $m | (110.4) | (100.3) | (110.4) | (96.9) |
| AISC | $/oz | 1,668 | 1,708 | 1,688 | 1,442 |
| Summary | Units | June 2025 Quarter | March 2025 Quarter | H1 2025 YTD | H1 2024 YTD | |
| Mining | Sulphide | |||||
| Ore Mined | t | 447,538 | 512,485 | 960,023 | 1,283.498 | |
| Mined Grade | g/t | 2.44 | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.62 | |
| Oxide | ||||||
| Ore Mined | t | 286,431 | 221,846 | 518,277 | 446,856 | |
| Mined Grade | g/t | 1.35 | 1.41 | 1.38 | 1.62 | |
| Processing | Sulphide | |||||
| Ore Processed | t | 576,049 | 587,009 | 1,163,058 | 1,121,004 | |
| Processed Grade | g/t | 2.22 | 2.35 | 2.29 | 2.71 | |
| Recovery | % | 76 | 77 | 76 | 79 | |
| Gold Poured | oz | 31,461 | 36,143 | 67,605 | 76,637 | |
| Gold Sold | oz | 32,767 | 30,733 | 63,500 | 72,008 | |
| Oxide | ||||||
| Ore Processed | t | 395,432 | 429,183 | 824,614 | 752,275 | |
| Processed Grade | g/t | 0.95 | 1.03 | 1.00 | 1.32 | |
| Recovery | % | 81 | 84 | 83 | 85 | |
| Gold Poured | oz | 9,563 | 12,091 | 21,654 | 27,422 | |
| Gold Sold | oz | 9,563 | 12,091 | 21,654 | 27,422 | |
| Cost | Combined | |||||
| Total Capital Expenditure | $m | 16.6 | 23.8 | 40.4 | 36.0 | |
| AISC | $/oz | 2,134 | 1,835 | 1,972 | 1,463 | |
| Summary | Units | June 2025 Quarter | March 2025 Quarter | H1 2025 YTD | H1 2024 YTD |
| Mining | |||||
| Ore Mined | t | 630,549 | 611,465 | 1,242,013 | 1,592,494 |
| Mined Grade | g/t | 2.05 | 1.76 | 1.91 | 1.87 |
| Processing | |||||
| Ore Processed | t | 586,307 | 533,995 | 1,120,302 | 1,103,157 |
| Processed Grade | g/t | 2.00 | 1.78 | 1.89 | 1.91 |
| Recovery | % | 93 | 92 | 92 | 93 |
| Gold Poured | oz | 34,938 | 27,263 | 62,201 | 63,081 |
| Gold Sold | oz | 38,467 | 21,498 | 59,965 | 57,891 |
| Financials | |||||
| Total Capital Expenditure | $m | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 8.4 |
| AISC | $/oz | 972 | 1,274 | 1,104 | 1,256 |
| Bantaco West MRE | |||
| Classification | Tonnes | Grade (g/t Au) | Ounces (Au) |
| North Domain (Inferred) | 3,233,000 | 0.94 | 98,000 |
| South Domain (Inferred) | 2,525,000 | 1.00 | 81,000 |
| Total | 5,758,000 | 0.97 | 179,000 |
| Bantaco South MRE | |||
| Classification | Tonnes | Grade (g/t Au) | Ounces (Au) |
| Inferred | 2,225,000 | 1.22 | 87,000 |
| Total | 2,225,000 | 1.22 | 87,000 |
| Resolute Matthias O'Toole Howes, Corporate Development and Investor Relations Manager Matthias.otoolehowes@resolutemining.com +44 203 3017 620 | Public Relations Jos Simson, Tavistock resolute@tavistock.co.uk +44 207 920 3150 Corporate Brokers Jennifer Lee, Berenberg +44 20 3753 3040 Tom Rider, BMO Capital Markets +44 20 7236 1010 |
| June 2025 - Quarter to date | Units | Syama Sulphide | Syama Oxide | Syama | Mako | Group Total | ||
| UG Lateral Development | m | 968 | - | 968 | - | 968 | ||
| UG Vertical Development | m | 57 | - | 57 | - | 57 | ||
| Total UG Development | m | 1,025 | - | 1,025 | - | 1,025 | ||
| UG Ore Mined | t | 447,538 | - | 447,538 | - | 447,538 | ||
| UG Grade Mined | g/t | 2.44 | - | 2.44 | - | 2.44 | ||
| OP Operating Waste | BCM | - | 1,218,046 | 1,218,046 | 85,018 | 1,303,064 | ||
| OP Ore Mined | BCM | - | 164,882 | 164,882 | 229,365 | 393,247 | ||
| OP Grade Mined | g/t | - | 1.35 | 2.01 | 2.05 | 2.03 | ||
| Total Ore Mined | t | 447,538 | 296,431 | 743,969 | 630,549 | 1,374,518 | ||
| Total Tonnes Processed | t | 576,049 | 395,432 | 971,481 | 586,307 | 1,557,788 | ||
| Grade Processed | g/t | 2.22 | 0.95 | 1.70 | 2.00 | 1.82 | ||
| Recovery | % | 76 | 81 | 78 | 93 | 84 | ||
| Gold Recovered | oz | 31,174 | 9,883 | 41,057 | 34,857 | 75,914 | ||
| Gold in Circuit Drawdown/(Addition) | oz | 287 | (320) | (33) | 81 | 48 | ||
| Gold Produced (Poured) | oz | 31,461 | 9,563 | 41,024 | 34,938 | 75,962 | ||
| Gold Bullion in Metal Account Movement (Increase)/Decrease | oz | 1,306 | - | 1,306 | 3,529 | 4,835 | ||
| Gold Sold | Oz | 32,767 | 9,563 | 42,330 | 38,467 | 80,797 | ||
| Achieved Gold Price | $/oz | - | - | - | - | 3,261 | ||
| Cost Summary | ||||||||
| Mining | $/oz | 578 | 724 | 612 | 192 | 419 | ||
| Processing | $/oz | 693 | 1,114 | 792 | 367 | 596 | ||
| Site Administration | $/oz | 193 | 387 | 238 | 117 | 182 | ||
| Site Operating Costs | $/oz | 1,464 | 2,225 | 1,642 | 676 | 1,197 | ||
| Royalties | $/oz | 388 | 388 | 388 | 203 | 305 | ||
| By-Product Credits + Corp Admin | $/oz | (3) | (3) | (3) | - | 64 | ||
| Total Cash Operating Costs | $/oz | 1,849 | 2,610 | 2,027 | 879 | 1,566 | ||
| Sustaining Capital + Others | $/oz | 100 | 402 | 170 | 30 | 106 | ||
| Inventory Adjustments | $/oz | (13) | (227) | (63) | 63 | (4) | ||
| All-In Sustaining Cost (AISC) AISC is calculated on gold produced (poured) | $/oz | 1,936 | 2,785 | 2,134 | 972 | 1,668 |
| June 2025 - Year to date | Units | Syama Sulphide | Syama Oxide | Syama | Mako | Group Total | ||
| UG Lateral Development | m | 2,499 | - | 2,499 | - | 2,499 | ||
| UG Vertical Development | m | 57 | - | 57 | - | 57 | ||
| Total UG Development | m | 2,556 | - | 2,556 | - | 2,556 | ||
| UG Ore Mined | t | 960,023 | - | 960,023 | - | 960,023 | ||
| UG Grade Mined | g/t | 2.45 | - | 2.45 | - | 2.45 | ||
| OP Operating Waste | BCM | - | 3,113,827 | 3,113,827 | 566,066 | 3,679,893 | ||
| OP Ore Mined | BCM | - | 285,740 | 285,740 | 448,893 | 734,633 | ||
| OP Grade Mined | g/t | - | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.91 | 1.70 | ||
| Total Ore Mined | t | 960,023 | 518,277 | 1,478,300 | 1,242,013 | 2,720,313 | ||
| Total Tonnes Processed | t | 1,163,058 | 824,614 | 1,987,672 | 1,120,302 | 3,107,974 | ||
| Grade Processed | g/t | 2.29 | 1.00 | 1.75 | 1.89 | 1.80 | ||
| Recovery | % | 76 | 83 | 79 | 93 | 84 | ||
| Gold Recovered | oz | 65,268 | 21,878 | 87,146 | 63,049 | 150,195 | ||
| Gold in Circuit Drawdown/(Addition) | oz | 2,337 | (224) | 2,113 | (848) | 1,265 | ||
| Gold Produced (Poured) | oz | 67,605 | 21,654 | 89,259 | 62,201 | 151,460 | ||
| Gold Bullion in Metal Account Movement (Increase)/Decrease | oz | (4,105) | - | (4,105) | (2,236) | (6,341) | ||
| Gold Sold | Oz | 63,500 | 21,654 | 85,155 | 59,965 | 145,119 | ||
| Achieved Gold Price | $/oz | 3,076 | ||||||
| Cost Summary | ||||||||
| Mining | $/oz | 530 | 587 | 544 | 275 | 433 | ||
| Processing | $/oz | 633 | 965 | 714 | 409 | 589 | ||
| Site Administration | $/oz | 163 | 334 | 205 | 131 | 174 | ||
| Site Operating Costs | $/oz | 1,326 | 1,886 | 1,463 | 815 | 1,196 | ||
| Royalties | $/oz | 330 | 324 | 329 | 169 | 266 | ||
| By-Product Credits + Corp Admin | $/oz | (3) | (3) | (3) | - | 68 | ||
| Total Cash Operating Costs | $/oz | 1,653 | 2,207 | 1,789 | 984 | 1,530 | ||
| Sustaining Capital + Others | $/oz | 115 | 492 | 206 | 34 | 135 | ||
| Inventory Adjustments | $/oz | 30 | (183) | (23) | 86 | 23 | ||
| All-In Sustaining Cost (AISC) AISC is calculated on gold produced (poured) | $/oz | 1,798 | 2,516 | 1,972 | 1,104 | 1,688 |
| Hole_ID | North (WGS) | East (WGS) | RL (m) | Dip | Azi (WGS) | EOH (m) | From (m) | To (m) | Width (m) | Au (g/t) |
| BADD0001 | 1414923 | 794169 | 163 | -52 | 128 | 218 | 96 | 105 | 9 | 1.73 |
| BADD0004 | 1412809 | 801448 | 163 | -52 | 125 | 209 | 137 | 155 | 18 | 3.6 |
| BADD0005 | 1410817 | 799918 | 154 | -51 | 124 | 212 | 77 | 107 | 30 | 2.26 |
| BARC00018 | 1411406 | 800244 | 122 | -51 | 125 | 156 | 79 | 84 | 5 | 6.16 |
| BARC00034 | 1412553 | 801283 | 120 | -50 | 125 | 162 | 60 | 70 | 10 | 9.88 |
| BARC00037 | 1412789 | 801471 | 104 | -50 | 125 | 150 | 103 | 108 | 5 | 7.07 |
| BARC00041 | 1410807 | 799949 | 150 | -51 | 125 | 150 | 53 | 65 | 12 | 1.33 |
| BARC00042 | 1410917 | 799923 | 146 | -50 | 125 | 186 | 77 | 84 | 7 | 2.17 |
| BARC00056 | 1414917 | 794182 | 155 | -50 | 130 | 116 | 92 | 105 | 13 | 1.49 |
| BARC00068 | 1414575 | 793417 | 140 | -51 | 132 | 150 | 2 | 25 | 23 | 1.04 |
| BARC00070 | 1410706 | 800131 | 126 | -51 | 125 | 198 | 47 | 65 | 18 | 1.1 |
| BARC00078 | 1414127 | 792912 | 122 | -49 | 130 | 150 | 6 | 23 | 17 | 1.19 |
| BARC00084 | 1411206 | 800497 | 120 | -52 | 125 | 150 | 30 | 36 | 6 | 2.77 |
| BARC00085 | 1413969 | 792809 | 114 | -50 | 130 | 150 | 35 | 49 | 14 | 1.82 |
| BARC00094 | 1411059 | 800151 | 126 | -50 | 125 | 192 | 111 | 114 | 3 | 24.8 |
| 145 | 152 | 7 | 4.29 | |||||||
| BARC00112 | 1415155 | 794239 | 131 | -49 | 130 | 220 | 115 | 126 | 11 | 2.31 |
| BARC00113 | 1415085 | 794314 | 137 | -49 | 130 | 160 | 8 | 32 | 24 | 0.9 |
| BARC00122 | 1414837 | 794180 | 143 | -49 | 130 | 150 | 36 | 53 | 17 | 1.38 |
| BARC00123 | 1414781 | 794084 | 164 | -51 | 130 | 180 | 117 | 140 | 23 | 1.41 |
| BARC00125 | 1414749 | 794122 | 153 | -50 | 130 | 110 | 21 | 34 | 13 | 1.37 |
| BARC00126 | 1414710 | 794023 | 159 | -52 | 130 | 200 | 87 | 109 | 22 | 1.49 |
| BARC00137 | 1414651 | 793400 | 171 | -52 | 130 | 174 | 112 | 122 | 10 | 2.38 |
| BARC00138 | 1414604 | 793314 | 128 | -51 | 130 | 200 | 5 | 19 | 14 | 1.32 |
| BARC00143 | 1414479 | 793292 | 130 | -49 | 130 | 80 | 1 | 15 | 14 | 1.27 |
| BARC00146 | 1414515 | 793330 | 132 | -50 | 130 | 100 | 4 | 40 | 36 | 1.09 |
| BARC00153 | 1414440 | 793149 | 121 | -52 | 130 | 168 | 33 | 41 | 8 | 2.02 |
| BARC00154 | 1414219 | 792857 | 120 | -50 | 130 | 200 | 38 | 56 | 18 | 1.96 |
| 85 | 93 | 8 | 2.07 | |||||||
| BARC00162 | 1414089 | 792924 | 112 | -52 | 130 | 90 | 8 | 18 | 10 | 2.16 |
| BARC00164 | 1414141 | 792794 | 114 | -52 | 130 | 210 | 112 | 128 | 16 | 1.21 |
| BARC00170 | 1414001 | 792846 | 116 | -52 | 130 | 156 | 30 | 42 | 12 | 1.96 |
| BARC00181 | 1410858 | 799847 | 144 | -51 | 126 | 276 | 123 | 138 | 15 | 1.15 |
| 176 | 188 | 12 | 1.63 | |||||||
| BARC00187 | 1410812 | 799837 | 150 | -52 | 126 | 155 | 148 | 155 | 7 | 3.65 |
| BARC00189 | 1410858 | 799940 | 158 | -52 | 126 | 200 | 57 | 74 | 17 | 1.05 |
| 80 | 95 | 15 | 1.02 | |||||||
| BARC00193 | 1410755 | 799926 | 159 | -51 | 126 | 150 | 59 | 86 | 27 | 0.99 |
| BARC00194 | 1410821 | 800000 | 146 | -50 | 126 | 220 | 0 | 16 | 16 | 2.71 |
| 39 | 55 | 16 | 1.03 | |||||||
| BARC00195 | 1410725 | 799969 | 145 | -53 | 126 | 126 | 37 | 47 | 10 | 2.45 |
| BARC00197 | 1410689 | 799856 | 147 | -52 | 126 | 162 | 91 | 106 | 15 | 1.15 |
| BARC00198 | 1410891 | 799958 | 139 | -50 | 126 | 174 | 58 | 67 | 9 | 2.55 |
| 140 | 153 | 13 | 1.26 | |||||||
| BARC00200 | 1410768 | 800065 | 138 | -52 | 126 | 200 | 177 | 197 | 20 | 2.28 |
| BARC00203 | 1415219 | 794320 | 129 | -49 | 130 | 180 | 72 | 89 | 17 | 1.03 |
| CRITERIA | JORC CODE EXPLANATION | COMMENTARY | ||
| Sampling techniques | · Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. · Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. · Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. · In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. | Sampling has been by diamond drill coring and reverse circulation chip. Diamond core has been geologically logged and sampled to geological contacts with nominal sample lengths between 0.3m and 4.5m (most commonly 1m). Core selected for assay is systematically cut lengthwise into half core by diamond blade rock saw, numbered and bagged before dispatch to the laboratory for analysis. All core is photographed, wet and dry. Reverse circulation chips are geologically logged and sampled on regular lengths of 1m. Chip material selected for assay is systematically divided to a 1/8 proportion using a rotary splitter attached to the cyclone sample recovery system, numbered and bagged before dispatch to the laboratory for analysis. | ||
| Drilling techniques | · Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.). | Diamond core drilling with standard inner tubes. NTW diameter (57.1 mm) to target depth where possible with some smaller NQ2 intervals as tails. Core is marked and oriented. Reverse Circulation drilling with 4" or 4.5" hammer and 4" rod string to target depth. | ||
| Drill sample recovery | · Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. · Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. · Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. | Diamond core recoveries are measured in the core trays and recorded as recovered metres and recovered % as part of the geological logging process. RC recoveries are monitored by chip sample weight recording. Sample weights have been analysed for cyclicity with no relationship between sample weight and depth noted. | ||
| Logging | · Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. · Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography. · The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. | Diamond core has been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate classification and reporting of a Mineral Resource. Reverse circulation chip samples have been geologically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate classification and reporting of a Mineral Resource. Total length of DD logged is 2,100m. Total length of RC logged is 37,360m. | ||
| Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation | · If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. · If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry. · For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. · Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. · Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. · Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. | Historic core has been systematically cut lengthwise into half core with a diamond saw. RC samples representing a 1/8 split are taken directly from the rig mounted cyclone by rotary splitter, sample weight is recorded, sample is bagged in pre numbered plastic and sample tickets are inserted and bag is sealed for transport to preparation facility. Generally, one of each of the two control samples (blank or CRM standard) is inserted into the sample stream every tenth sample. An industry standard, documented process of sample mark-up, core splitting, bagging and ticketing and recording is in place at the Mako site. All samples were submitted to external certified analytical laboratory, MSA Bamako. The 3kg sample were considered appropriate sample size for PhotonAssay analysis. MSA prepares the sample by weighing, drying, and crushing the entire sample to >70% passing 2mm, then into jarred up for PhotonAssay. | ||
| Quality of assay data and laboratory tests | · The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. · For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. · Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established. | Au assays are determined by Chrysos Photon assay at MSA labs in Bamako. Laboratory and assay procedures are appropriate for Mineral Resource estimation. QAQC consisted of standards, blanks and laboratory duplicates (both coarse and pulp). The QAQC sample results showed acceptable levels of accuracy and precision. The assay data is considered to be suitable for Mineral Resource estimation. | ||
| Verification of sampling and assaying | · The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. · The use of twinned holes. · Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. · Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | All aspects of the core sampling, assay procedures and QA/QC program have been reviewed and were judged to be suitable for use in the estimation of Mineral Resources. Drill hole assay result data has been checked against the original hardcopy laboratory assay reports for a representative number of holes. Below detection limit values (negatives) have been replaced by background values. Un-sampled intervals have been retained as un-sampled (null or blank). All of these intervals occur within the waste domain and have no material impact on the estimate. | ||
| Location of data points | · Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. · Specification of the grid system used. · Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | Drill holes have been surveyed by Mako Mine staff surveyors using a Leica GS14, GS15, and GS18 dGPS. Downhole surveys were undertaken by the drilling contractor using a Reflex DeviGyro tool with a reading taken every 3m downhole. Grid system is based on the UTM28N grid on the WGS84 ellipsoid. Survey heights are based on PRS097 (with independent checks on AusPos) and are orthometric (i.e. msl). A topographic surface with 1m resolution has been generated from a Lidar survey of the area. | ||
| Data spacing and distribution | · Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. · Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. · Whether sample compositing has been applied. | There is no Resource estimate on the various prospects to date | ||
| Orientation of data in relation to geological structure | · Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. · If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. | Geological structures are interpreted to be steeply-dipping to the north-west. Drilling intersects structures from the north west, generally dipping -60⁰ below horizontal. Drilling primarily targeted shears within volcanics and metasediments. The drilling orientation is adequate for a non-biased assessment of the orebody with respect to interpreted structures and interpreted controls on mineralisation. | ||
| Sample security | · The measures taken to ensure sample security. | Labelling and submission of samples complies with industry standard. | ||
| Audits or reviews | · The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. | The competent person audited the sample preparation laboratory in 2024. No material issues were found. | ||
| CRITERIA | JORC CODE EXPLANATION | COMMENTARY | ||
| Mineral tenement and land tenure status | · Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. · The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. | The Bantaco Permit is held by SNEPAC SARL. Toro Gold Limited is in a joint Venture with SNEPAC with Toro being the manager and sole funder of the joint Venture. Toro Gold Limited is a company controlled by Resolute Limited. The permit is in good standing. | ||
| Exploration done by other parties | · Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. | Past exploration has been performed by Ashanti Gold, and Randgold Resources on a previously held Research Permit which was relinquished prior to being held by SNEPAC SARL. Randgold had undertaken soil geochemistry, surface mapping and RAB drilling on the Research Permit. Ashanti Gold undertook RAB and diamond drilling. Subsequently SNEPAC carried out surface geochemistry, auger drilling and RC drilling on the current permit. | ||
| Geology | · Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. | Mineralisation is currently interpreted to be a standard Birimian orogenic gold deposit style. Gold is related to shears within volcanics and meta-sediments. Intensity of gold mineralisation appears to correlate with the intensity of pyrite development and exhibits lateral and vertical continuity through the mineralised zone. Geometry of the gold mineralisation is generally NNE to NE striking and vertical to steep westerly dipping. The zones vary between 4 and 30m wide. | ||
| Drill hole Information | · A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth o Whole length. · If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. | Easting, Northing and RL of the drill hole collars are based on the UTM28N grid on the WGS84 ellipsoid. Survey heights are based on PRS097 (with independent checks on AusPos) and are orthometric (i.e. msl). . Dip is the inclination of the hole from the horizontal. For example, a vertically down drilled hole from the surface is -90°. Azimuth is reported in degrees as the grid direction toward which the hole is drilled. Down hole length of the hole is the distance from the surface to the end of the hole, as measured along the drill trace. Intersection depth is the distance down the hole as measured along the drill trace. Intersection width is the downhole distance of an intersection as measured along the drill trace. Drill hole length is the distance from the surface to the end of the hole, as measured along the drill trace. | ||
| Data aggregation methods | · In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. · Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. · The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. | Sample intervals in this document are all 1m and are not composited in the drill intersections Top-cuts have not been used in the drill intersections. The assay intervals are reported as down hole length as the true width variable is not known. Gold assays are rounded to two decimal places. No metal equivalent reporting is used or applied. | ||
| Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths | · These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. · If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. · If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. 'down hole length, true width not known'). | The intersection width is measured down the hole trace and may not be the true width. All drill results are downhole intervals only due to the variable orientation of the mineralisation. | ||
| Diagrams | · Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. | A plan view is contained within this document. A table of intercepts is also included in this document. | ||
| Balanced reporting | · Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. | All significant assay results from Resolute work are provided in this report. The report is considered balanced and provided in context. | ||
| Other substantive exploration data | · Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. | No other exploration data is considered meaningful and material to this document. | ||
| Further work | · The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). · Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. | Future exploration may involve the drilling of more drillholes, both diamond core and reverse circulation, to further extend the mineralised zones and to collect additional detailed data on knownmineralised zones. Geophysical exploration is also planned as part of the future exploration of the permit. | ||