September 2025 Quarterly Activities Report
RNS Number : 0428F
Resolute Mining Limited
28 October 2025
28 October 2025
Q3 2025 Activities Report
For the Quarter ending 30 September 2025 ('Q3', 'September Quarter' or 'the Quarter')
Highlights
● Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) decrease to 1.95 from 2.02 at the end of September 2025 with five recordable injuries during the Quarter
● Group gold production of 59,857 ounces (oz) (Q2 2025: 75,962oz) as expected due to first full Quarter of stockpile processing at Mako and the impact of rainy season at both sites
● All-In Sustaining Costs (AISC) of $2,205/oz (Q2 2025: $1,668/oz) due to the combined impact of lower gold production and increased government royalties on higher realised gold prices
● Quarterly gold sales of 63,483oz at an average realised price of $3,404/oz (Q2 2025: 80,797oz at $3,261/oz)
● Quarterly capital expenditure (excluding exploration) of $26.5 million (Q2 2025: $17.6 million) in line with expectations consisting of $18.8 million non-sustaining and $7.7 million of sustaining capital
● Quarterly operating cash flow generation of $67.8 million (Q2 2025: $84.6 million) (operating cash flow before capital expenditure, exploration and working capital) with higher realised gold prices offsetting lower gold sales
● Net cash of $136.6 million (Q2 2025: $110.4 million), including cash and bullion of $168.2 million and drawn overdraft balances of $31.6 million; Group available liquidity of $244.5 million
● Unaudited EBITDA of $292.8 million for the nine months ending 30 September 2025
● Further progress at Bantaco with infill-drilling at Bantaco South Prospect confirming the continuity of the mineralisation along strike and down dip
● Updated Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) at the Doropo Project of 114.2 Mt grading 1.19g/t for 4.36 Moz of contained gold (vs previous MRE of 84.2 Mt grading 1.25g/t for 3.40 Moz)
● Positive government engagement in Bamako in October with the Resolute delegation, led by CEO Chris Eger, meeting the Prime Minister of Mali and the Minister of Mines
● Group production in line with original guidance, at lower end. Year-end guidance narrowed to 275-285 koz from 275-300 koz reflecting a combination of increased guidance at Mako and lower guidance at Syama; Group AISC revised to $1,750 - 1,850/oz (from $1,650 - 1,750/oz) due to impact of higher royalties and lower production at Syama
o Syama production guidance revised to 177-183 koz (from 195-210 koz) consisting of 37-40 koz oxide and 140-143 koz sulphide; Syama AISC revised to $1,900-2,050/oz (from $1,700-1,800/oz) due to higher royalties that, year-to-date, have added approximately $125/oz
o Mako guidance increased to 98-102 koz (from 80-90 koz), Mako AISC is maintained at $1,300-1,400/oz with stronger production offsetting higher royalties
● Capital expenditure guidance ($109 - 126 million) is on track
Note: Unless otherwise stated, all dollar figures are United States dollars ($).
Resolute Mining Limited (Resolute, the Company or the Group) (ASX/LSE: RSG), the Africa-focused gold miner, is pleased to present its Quarterly Activities Report for the period ended 30 September 2025.
Chris Eger, Chief Executive Officer, commented,
"2025 continues to be a transformational year across the business as we optimize our producing assets and execute on building a diverse Africa-focused gold producer.
In Mali we have made key management changes at both Syama and in Bamako. Our new COO, Gavin Harris, has spent considerable time on site at Syama leading operational initiatives which are already delivering value. Earlier this month, I was in Mali to meet the Prime Minister and Minister of Mines to help establish a stronger line of communication and to discuss the supply chain challenges facing the industry which have continued to impact performance at Syama. We have made considerable progress on the Syama Sulphide Conversion Project which remains on budget and on track for commissioning in mid-2026. During the Quarter, the CCIL tanks were commissioned, and the pebble crusher is due to be commissioned shortly. Both will immediately add operational flexibility to the current operation. The flotation circuit will be commissioned in January 2026 when we plan to start treating high-grade sulphide material. The last components of the project are the secondary crushing circuit, ball mill and the roaster upgrades all of which are due to be completed and commissioned by the end of Q2 next year. From this point on we will be ramping up to process 100% sulphide material at Syama. Once operational, this will create a strong foundation where annual production is expected to be in excess of that originally guided for 2025.
Elsewhere in the Company we have made great progress on the Mako Life Extension Project in Senegal. Drilling and technical work has further increased our confidence in two key satellite deposits, Tomboronkoto and Bantaco. We believe they will provide a meaningful extension to the Mako operation within the next two to three years. The other major achievement this year was the acquisition of the Doropo and ABC projects in Côte d'Ivoire. The development of Doropo remains on track with the next key milestone being the updated DFS in Q4 this year. During the Quarter we increased community engagement activities which are being well received and in September, an update of the Doropo MRE was announced showing an increase of over 1 Moz to 4.4 Moz, a 28% increase in contained gold with only a 5% reduction in grade. These high-quality projects represent the next phases of organic growth for Resolute. Our focus is on progressing Doropo towards construction and it becoming the Company's newest mine.
Elsewhere in Côte d'Ivoire, exploration activities at the ABC Project started with targets outlined on the Farako-Nafana permit. A 10,000m drill program to test these targets is due to start next month. At our other advanced exploration project, La Debo, we are updating the Mineral Resource Estimate and expect to release this before the end of 2025.
It has been a stable Quarter on the operational front; the lower production is in line with management expectations reflecting the rainy season and the transition to stockpile processing at Mako. Mako has continued to show strong performance with the first full Quarter of stockpile processing exceeding expectations. At Syama we continued to experience supply chain issues which have had a meaningful impact on gold production so far in 2025. While we are cautiously optimistic that we are addressing these issues, at this stage the situation in Mali continues to be unpredictable.
Following the performance this quarter, we have updated guidance for both assets while maintaining our original Group production guidance, narrowed to 275-285 koz - we currently expect to be at the lower end of this range. At Mako, we have increased guidance to 98-102koz (from 80-90 koz). At Syama, we have revised guidance to 177-183 koz (from 195-210 koz).
Although Mako and Syama continue to demonstrate strong cost discipline, we have revised Group AISC to $1,750-1,850/oz. This increase is primarily driven by higher royalties resulting from the year-to-date rise in gold prices, which has added approximately $100/oz at the Group level.
I remain very pleased with the strong cash flow generation across the business with the net cash position increasing by $26 million over the Quarter to $136 million. The strengthening of our balance sheet and solid liquidity position provides a credible platform to advance our organic growth initiatives including the Mako Life Extension Project in Senegal, the Syama Sulphide Conversion Project in Mali and our new Doropo project in Côte d'Ivoire.
Moving into final quarter of 2025, I am confident of a stable end to the year and that the Company is well-positioned for positive performance in 2026. The Company's strong cash flow will be used to drive key strategic initiatives that ultimately create value for all stakeholders."
Webcast and Conference Call
Resolute will host a conference call for investors, analysts, and media on 28 October 2025, to discuss the Company's Quarterly Activities Report for the period ending 30 September 2025. This call will conclude with a question-and-answer session.
Conference Call: 8:00pm (AEDT, Sydney) / 9:00am (GMT, London)
Webcast registration link: https://brrmedia.news/RSGQ3_2025
Those wishing to ask questions as part of the Q&A should use the conference call facility (please join five minutes prior to the start time).
Conference call details:
| Dial in number(s) | UK-Wide: +44 (0) 33 0551 0200 UK Toll Free: 0808 109 0700 Australia Toll Free: 1 800 681 584 USA Toll Free: 866 580 3963 South Africa Toll Free: 0 800 980 512 |
| Password (if prompted) | Quote Resolute Mining Q3 when prompted by the operator |
| Group Summary | Units | September 2025 Quarter | June 2025 Quarter | September 2024 Quarter | Nine Months 2025 YTD | Nine Months 2024 YTD |
| Mining | ||||||
| Ore Mined | t | 672,177 | 1,374,517 | 1,368,297 | 3,392,489 | 4,691,145 |
| Mined Grade | g/t | 2.10 | 2.03 | 2.06 | 2.02 | 2.10 |
| Processing | ||||||
| Ore Processed | t | 1,520,742 | 1,557,787 | 1,529,134 | 4,628,717 | 4,505,571 |
| Processed Grade | g/t | 1.48 | 1.82 | 2.00 | 1.70 | 2.05 |
| Recovery | % | 82 | 84 | 85 | 83 | 86 |
| Gold Poured | oz | 59,857 | 75,962 | 85,043 | 211,318 | 252,182 |
| Sales | ||||||
| Gold Sold | oz | 63,483 | 80,797 | 95,242 | 208,603 | 252,563 |
| Average Realised Price | $/oz | 3,404 | 3,261 | 2,493 | 3,175 | 2,292 |
| Financials | ||||||
| Total Capital Expenditure | $m | 26.6 | 17.6 | 26.6 | 68.9 | 71.0 |
| Net (Cash)/Debt | $m | (136.6) | (110.4) | (145.6) | (136.6) | (145.6) |
| AISC | $/oz | 2,205 | 1,668 | 1,452 | 1,834 | 1,444 |
| Summary | Units | September 2025 Quarter | June 2025 Quarter | September 2024 Quarter | Nine Months 2025 YTD | Nine Months 2024 YTD | |
| Mining | Sulphide | ||||||
| Ore Mined | t | 490,154 | 447,538 | 554,221 | 1,450,177 | 1,837,719 | |
| Mined Grade | g/t | 2.25 | 2.44 | 2.50 | 2.38 | 2.58 | |
| Oxide | |||||||
| Ore Mined | t | 182,023 | 286,431 | 111,098 | 700,299 | 557,954 | |
| Mined Grade | g/t | 1.70 | 1.35 | 1.40 | 1.46 | 1.58 | |
| Processing | Sulphide | ||||||
| Ore Processed | t | 614,262 | 576,049 | 622,620 | 1,777,320 | 1,743,624 | |
| Processed Grade | g/t | 2.08 | 2.22 | 2.63 | 2.22 | 2.68 | |
| Recovery | % | 75 | 76 | 78 | 76 | 79 | |
| Gold Poured | oz | 31,833 | 31,461 | 42,878 | 99,438 | 119,515 | |
| Gold Sold | oz | 37,419 | 32,767 | 47,776 | 100,919 | 119,784 | |
| Oxide | |||||||
| Ore Processed | t | 349,494 | 395,432 | 352,933 | 1,174,109 | 1,105,208 | |
| Processed Grade | g/t | 0.91 | 0.95 | 1.06 | 0.97 | 1.23 | |
| Recovery | % | 79 | 81 | 84 | 82 | 84 | |
| Gold Poured | oz | 8,085 | 9,563 | 10,113 | 29,740 | 37,535 | |
| Gold Sold | oz | 8,085 | 9,563 | 10,113 | 29,740 | 37,535 | |
| Cost | Syama combined | ||||||
| Total Capital Expenditure | $m | 26.0 | 16.6 | 22.6 | 42.5 | 39.6 | |
| AISC | $/oz | 2,358 | 2,134 | 1,533 | 2,092 | 1,487 | |
| Summary | Units | September 2025 Quarter | June 2025 Quarter | September 2024 Quarter | Nine Months 2025 YTD | Nine Months 2024 YTD |
| Mining | ||||||
| Ore Mined | t | - | 630,549 | 702,978 | 1,242,013 | 2,295,472 |
| Mined Grade | g/t | - | 2.05 | 1.82 | 1.91 | 1.85 |
| Processing | ||||||
| Ore Processed | t | 556,986 | 586,307 | 553,581 | 1,677,288 | 1,656,739 |
| Processed Grade | g/t | 1.18 | 2.00 | 1.89 | 1.66 | 1.92 |
| Recovery | % | 91 | 93 | 93 | 92 | 93 |
| Gold Poured | oz | 19,939 | 34,938 | 32,052 | 82,140 | 95,132 |
| Gold Sold | oz | 17,979 | 38,467 | 37,353 | 77,944 | 95,244 |
| Financials | ||||||
| Total Capital Expenditure | $m | 0.6 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 12.4 |
| AISC | $/oz | 1,415 | 972 | 1,125 | 1,180 | 1,212 |
| Doropo Mineral Resource Estimate | ||||||
| September 2025 (0.3g/t Au cut-off, $3,000/oz pit shell, JORC 2012) | October 2023 (0.3g/t Au cut-off, $2,000/oz pit shell, CIM 2014) | |||||
| Classification | Tonnes | Grade (g/t Au) | Ounces (Au) | Tonnes | Grade (g/t Au) | Ounces (Au) |
| Measured | 1,550,000 | 1.57 | 78,000 | 1,510,000 | 1.60 | 77,000 |
| Indicated | 95,200,000 | 1.18 | 3,601,000 | 75,340,000 | 1.25 | 3,027,000 |
| Inferred | 17,440,000 | 1.21 | 680,000 | 7,370,000 | 1.23 | 292,000 |
| Total | 114,190,000 | 1.19 | 4,360,000 | 84,220,000 | 1.25 | 3,396,000 |
| Resolute Matthias O'Toole Howes, Corporate Development and Investor Relations Manager Matthias.otoolehowes@resolutemining.com +44 203 3017 620 | Public Relations Jos Simson, Tavistock resolute@tavistock.co.uk +44 207 920 3150 Corporate Brokers Jennifer Lee, Berenberg +44 20 3753 3040 Tom Rider, BMO Capital Markets +44 20 7236 1010 |
| September 2025 - Quarter to date | Units | Syama Sulphide | Syama Oxide | Syama | Mako | Group Total | ||
| UG Lateral Development | m | 580 | - | 580 | - | 580 | ||
| UG Vertical Development | m | 17 | - | 17 | - | 17 | ||
| Total UG Development | m | 597 | - | 597 | - | 597 | ||
| UG Ore Mined | t | 490,154 | - | 490,154 | - | 490,154 | ||
| UG Grade Mined | g/t | 2.25 | - | 2.25 | - | 2.25 | ||
| OP Operating Waste | BCM | - | 1,301,480 | 1,301,480 | - | 1,301,480 | ||
| OP Ore Mined | BCM | - | 88,327 | 88,327 | - | 88,327 | ||
| OP Grade Mined | g/t | - | 1.70 | 2.10 | - | 2.10 | ||
| Total Ore Mined | t | 490,154 | 182,023 | 672,177 | - | 672,177 | ||
| Total Tonnes Processed | t | 614,262 | 349,494 | 963,756 | 556,986 | 1,520,742 | ||
| Grade Processed | g/t | 2.08 | 0.91 | 1.66 | 1.18 | 1.48 | ||
| Recovery | % | 75 | 79 | 76 | 91 | 82 | ||
| Gold Recovered | oz | 30,915 | 8,042 | 38,957 | 19,256 | 58,213 | ||
| Gold in Circuit Drawdown/(Addition) | oz | 918 | 43 | 961 | 683 | 1,644 | ||
| Gold Produced (Poured) | oz | 31,833 | 8,085 | 39,918 | 19,939 | 59,857 | ||
| Gold Bullion in Metal Account Movement (Increase)/Decrease | oz | 5,586 | - | 5,586 | (1,960) | 3,626 | ||
| Gold Sold | oz | 37,419 | 8,085 | 45,504 | 17,979 | 63,483 | ||
| Achieved Gold Price | $/oz | - | - | - | - | 3,404 | ||
| Cost Summary | ||||||||
| Mining | $/oz | 466 | 1,041 | 583 | 194 | 453 | ||
| Processing | $/oz | 711 | 1,335 | 838 | 705 | 794 | ||
| Site Administration | $/oz | 211 | 464 | 262 | 184 | 236 | ||
| Site Operating Costs | $/oz | 1,388 | 2,840 | 1,682 | 1,083 | 1,483 | ||
| Royalties | $/oz | 464 | 476 | 466 | 170 | 370 | ||
| By-Product Credits + Corp Admin | $/oz | (4) | (4) | (4) | - | 155 | ||
| Total Cash Operating Costs | $/oz | 1,848 | 3,312 | 2,145 | 1,253 | 2,008 | ||
| Sustaining Capital + Others | $/oz | 212 | 46 | 179 | 29 | 129 | ||
| Inventory Adjustments | $/oz | 243 | (782) | 35 | 134 | 68 | ||
| All-In Sustaining Cost (AISC) AISC is calculated on gold produced (poured) | $/oz | 2,303 | 2,576 | 2,358 | 1,415 | 2,205 |
| September 2025 - Year to date | Units | Syama Sulphide | Syama Oxide | Syama Total | Mako | Group Total | ||
| UG Lateral Development | m | 3,080 | - | 3,080 | - | 3,080 | ||
| UG Vertical Development | m | 73 | - | 73 | - | 73 | ||
| Total UG Development | m | 3,153 | - | 3,153 | - | 3,153 | ||
| UG Ore Mined | t | 1,450,177 | - | 1,450,177 | - | 1,450,177 | ||
| UG Grade Mined | g/t | 2.38 | - | 2.38 | - | 2.38 | ||
| OP Operating Waste | BCM | - | 4,415,307 | 4,415,307 | 566,066 | 4,981,373 | ||
| OP Ore Mined | BCM | - | 374,067 | 374,067 | 448,893 | 822,960 | ||
| OP Grade Mined | g/t | - | 1.46 | 1.46 | 1.91 | 1.70 | ||
| Total Ore Mined | t | 1,450,177 | 700,299 | 2,150,476 | 1,242,013 | 3,392,489 | ||
| Total Tonnes Processed | t | 1,777,320 | 1,174,109 | 2,951,429 | 1,677,288 | 4,628,717 | ||
| Grade Processed | g/t | 2.22 | 0.97 | 1.72 | 1.66 | 1.70 | ||
| Recovery | % | 76 | 82 | 78 | 92 | 83 | ||
| Gold Recovered | oz | 96,183 | 29,920 | 126,103 | 82,305 | 208,408 | ||
| Gold in Circuit Drawdown/(Addition) | oz | 3,255 | (180) | 3,075 | (165) | 2,910 | ||
| Gold Produced (Poured) | oz | 99,438 | 29,740 | 129,178 | 82,140 | 211,318 | ||
| Gold Bullion in Metal Account Movement (Increase)/Decrease | oz | 1,481 | - | 1,481 | (4,196) | (2,715) | ||
| Gold Sold | oz | 100,919 | 29,740 | 130,659 | 77,944 | 208,603 | ||
| Achieved Gold Price | $/oz | - | - | - | - | 3,175 | ||
| Cost Summary | ||||||||
| Mining | $/oz | 509 | 710 | 556 | 256 | 439 | ||
| Processing | $/oz | 658 | 1,066 | 752 | 481 | 647 | ||
| Site Administration | $/oz | 179 | 369 | 222 | 144 | 192 | ||
| Site Operating Costs | $/oz | 1,346 | 2,145 | 1,530 | 881 | 1,278 | ||
| Royalties | $/oz | 373 | 365 | 371 | 169 | 295 | ||
| By-Product Credits + Corp Admin | $/oz | (4) | (4) | (4) | - | 93 | ||
| Total Cash Operating Costs | $/oz | 1,715 | 2,506 | 1,897 | 1,050 | 1,666 | ||
| Sustaining Capital + Others | $/oz | 146 | 371 | 198 | 32 | 133 | ||
| Inventory Adjustments | $/oz | 99 | (345) | (3) | 98 | 35 | ||
| All-In Sustaining Cost (AISC) AISC is calculated on gold produced (poured) | $/oz | 1,960 | 2,532 | 2,092 | 1,180 | 1,834 |
| Hole_ID | North (WGS) | East (WGS) | RL (m) | Dip | Azi (WGS) | EOH (m) | From (m) | To (m) | Width (m) | Au (g/t) |
| BADD0022 | 1415324 | 794256 | 118 | -51 | 134 | 290 | 232 | 245 | 13 | 1.57 |
| BADD0024 | 1410778 | 799985 | 140 | -51 | 123 | 111 | 22 | 54 | 32 | 2.79 |
| BADD0026 | 1410734 | 799915 | 133 | -52 | 120 | 178 | 78 | 97 | 19 | 0.95 |
| BADD0028 | 1410682 | 799908 | 132 | -51 | 125 | 161 | 84 | 96 | 12 | 1.97 |
| BADD0030 | 1410793 | 800141 | 128 | -51 | 127 | 224 | 36 | 46 | 10 | 4.56 |
| BADD0031 | 1410857 | 799972 | 141 | -53 | 125 | 311 | 24 | 68 | 44 | 1.49 |
| BADD0032 | 1410893 | 800015 | 136 | -53 | 127 | 238 | 177 | 180 | 3 | 11.03 |
| BADD0038 | 1410746 | 799859 | 139 | -50 | 122 | 182 | 72 | 82 | 10 | 1.67 |
| BADD0038 | 1410746 | 799859 | 139 | -50 | 122 | 182 | 95 | 107 | 12 | 1.82 |
| BADD0041 | 1410878 | 799910 | 145 | -51 | 123 | 157 | 101 | 123 | 22 | 1.8 |
| BADD0042 | 1410763 | 799915 | 144 | -52 | 124 | 140 | 79 | 95 | 16 | 1.18 |
| BADD0043 | 1410846 | 799995 | 141 | -51 | 128 | 158 | 1 | 13 | 12 | 1.49 |
| BADD0043 | 1410846 | 799995 | 141 | -51 | 128 | 158 | 18 | 29 | 11 | 1.38 |
| BADD0044 | 1410880 | 799985 | 137 | -50 | 124 | 153 | 19 | 32 | 13 | 2.1 |
| BADD0045 | 1410678 | 799874 | 134 | -52 | 123 | 188 | 109 | 139 | 30 | 1.96 |
| BADD0050 | 1410827 | 799860 | 148 | -52 | 125 | 240 | 117 | 130 | 13 | 2.4 |
| BADD0051 | 1410788 | 799830 | 150 | -52 | 124 | 245 | 49 | 52 | 3 | 5.51 |
| BADD0051 | 1410788 | 799830 | 150 | -52 | 124 | 245 | 151 | 173 | 22 | 0.9 |
| BADD0053 | 1410743 | 799820 | 143 | -53 | 120 | 239 | 146 | 169 | 23 | 1 |
| BADD0055 | 1410787 | 799849 | 149 | -50 | 124 | 205 | 136 | 152 | 16 | 1.69 |
| BADD0057 | 1410834 | 800088 | 128 | -51 | 118 | 176 | 123 | 139 | 16 | 3.79 |
| BARC00484 | 1410613 | 799870 | 135 | -50 | 125 | 186 | 69 | 84 | 15 | 1.8 |
| BARC00494 | 1410579 | 800022 | 132 | -49 | 125 | 147 | 49 | 52 | 3 | 6.52 |
| BARC00501 | 1410845 | 799907 | 147 | -51 | 125 | 144 | 86 | 121 | 35 | 2.29 |
| BARC00503 | 1410692 | 800107 | 129 | -52 | 125 | 204 | 79 | 106 | 27 | 2.5 |
| BARC00503 | 1410692 | 800107 | 129 | -52 | 125 | 204 | 117 | 129 | 12 | 1.3 |
| BARC00507 | 1410665 | 799896 | 132 | -50 | 125 | 156 | 83 | 100 | 17 | 1.63 |
| BARC00510 | 1410869 | 800005 | 139 | -49 | 125 | 160 | 10 | 26 | 16 | 1.43 |
| BARC00512 | 1410745 | 799953 | 142 | -50 | 125 | 114 | 41 | 78 | 37 | 2.76 |
| BARC00514 | 1410706 | 799864 | 136 | -51 | 125 | 174 | 148 | 157 | 9 | 2.88 |
| BARC00515 | 1410829 | 800101 | 126 | -48 | 125 | 150 | 101 | 118 | 17 | 1.54 |
| BARC00516 | 1410724 | 799805 | 142 | -52 | 124 | 173 | 157 | 173 | 16 | 2.05 |
| BARC00525 | 1410814 | 799888 | 148 | -51 | 125 | 170 | 87 | 103 | 16 | 1.66 |
| BARC00525 | 1410814 | 799888 | 148 | -51 | 125 | 170 | 109 | 144 | 35 | 2.21 |
| BARC00526 | 1410745 | 799984 | 137 | -49 | 125 | 102 | 30 | 63 | 33 | 1.41 |
| BARC00527 | 1410802 | 799907 | 150 | -50 | 125 | 94 | 65 | 76 | 11 | 2.47 |
| BARC00527 | 1410802 | 799907 | 150 | -50 | 125 | 94 | 82 | 94 | 12 | 1.89 |
| BARC00527A | 1410800 | 799907 | 147 | -51 | 125 | 162 | 97 | 112 | 15 | 1.98 |
| BARC00534 | 1410783 | 799931 | 146 | -48 | 126 | 138 | 51 | 93 | 42 | 1.32 |
| BARC00538 | 1410876 | 799948 | 144 | -50 | 125 | 120 | 66 | 89 | 23 | 1.18 |
| BARC00539 | 1410898 | 799924 | 144 | -50 | 125 | 132 | 76 | 90 | 14 | 2.39 |
| BARC00539 | 1410898 | 799924 | 144 | -50 | 125 | 132 | 94 | 111 | 17 | 1.64 |
| BARC00543 | 1410859 | 799890 | 147 | -51 | 125 | 144 | 124 | 133 | 9 | 2.92 |
| BARC00544 | 1410798 | 800146 | 128 | -49 | 126 | 150 | 21 | 38 | 17 | 1.78 |
| BARC00545 | 1410829 | 799976 | 142 | -51 | 125 | 120 | 28 | 43 | 15 | 1.81 |
| BARC00548 | 1410755 | 800008 | 139 | -52 | 125 | 80 | 1 | 19 | 18 | 2.5 |
| BARC00550 | 1410826 | 800020 | 141 | -52 | 125 | 60 | 27 | 36 | 9 | 2.22 |
| BARC00554 | 1410795 | 800103 | 125 | -49 | 125 | 132 | 77 | 86 | 9 | 2.87 |
| BARC00557 | 1410740 | 799997 | 137 | -50 | 125 | 156 | 47 | 76 | 29 | 1.6 |
| BARC00558 | 1410766 | 799952 | 143 | -52 | 125 | 150 | 41 | 70 | 29 | 1.58 |
| BARC00573 | 1414174 | 792865 | 106 | -52 | 130 | 114 | 1 | 13 | 12 | 1.52 |
| BARC00573 | 1414174 | 792865 | 106 | -52 | 130 | 114 | 64 | 72 | 8 | 2.78 |
| BARC00575 | 1414200 | 792876 | 109 | -50 | 130 | 126 | 56 | 68 | 12 | 1.86 |
| BARC00578 | 1414263 | 792854 | 110 | -50 | 130 | 126 | 71 | 105 | 34 | 1.16 |
| BARC00581 | 1414266 | 792883 | 111 | -50 | 130 | 132 | 44 | 62 | 18 | 1.41 |
| BARC00582 | 1414234 | 792794 | 108 | -50 | 130 | 187 | 135 | 141 | 6 | 3.03 |
| BARC00585 | 1414165 | 792853 | 105 | -50 | 130 | 108 | 2 | 17 | 15 | 1.28 |
| BARC00585 | 1414165 | 792853 | 105 | -50 | 130 | 108 | 72 | 93 | 21 | 1.11 |
| BARC00600 | 1415035 | 794300 | 131 | -50 | 130 | 84 | 32 | 64 | 32 | 1.89 |
| BARC00604 | 1415123 | 794312 | 131 | -51 | 130 | 90 | 28 | 51 | 23 | 0.7 |
| BARC00611 | 1414970 | 794294 | 131 | -52 | 130 | 72 | 8 | 19 | 11 | 2.22 |
| BARC00614 | 1414892 | 794192 | 135 | -51 | 130 | 114 | 47 | 64 | 17 | 1.24 |
| BARC00618 | 1414882 | 794178 | 136 | -50 | 130 | 120 | 57 | 78 | 21 | 1.15 |
| BARC00620 | 1414706 | 794112 | 164 | -51 | 130 | 84 | 18 | 33 | 15 | 1.08 |
| BARC00623 | 1414732 | 794113 | 168 | -53 | 130 | 120 | 20 | 32 | 12 | 4.13 |
| BARC00640 | 1414816 | 794162 | 157 | -51 | 130 | 114 | 38 | 50 | 12 | 1.48 |
| CRITERIA | JORC CODE EXPLANATION | COMMENTARY | ||
| Sampling techniques | ● Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. ● Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. ● Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. ● In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. | Sampling has been by diamond drill coring and reverse circulation chip. Diamond core has been geologically logged and sampled to geological contacts with nominal sample lengths between 0.3m and 4.5m (most commonly 1m). Core selected for assay is systematically cut lengthwise into half core by diamond blade rock saw, numbered and bagged before dispatch to the laboratory for analysis. All core is photographed, wet and dry. Reverse circulation chips are geologically logged and sampled on regular lengths of 1m. Chip material selected for assay is systematically divided to a 1/8 proportion using a rotary splitter attached to the cyclone sample recovery system, numbered and bagged before dispatch to the laboratory for analysis. | ||
| Drilling techniques | ● Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.). | Diamond core drilling with standard inner tubes. NTW diameter (57.1 mm) to target depth where possible with some smaller NQ2 intervals as tails. Core is marked and oriented. Reverse Circulation drilling with 4" or 4.5" hammer and 4" rod string to target depth. | ||
| Drill sample recovery | ● Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. ● Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. ● Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. | Diamond core recoveries are measured in the core trays and recorded as recovered metres and recovered % as part of the geological logging process. RC recoveries are monitored by chip sample weight recording. Sample weights have been analysed for cyclicity with no relationship between sample weight and depth noted. | ||
| Logging | ● Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. ● Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography. ● The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. | Diamond core has been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate classification and reporting of a Mineral Resource. Reverse circulation chip samples have been geologically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate classification and reporting of a Mineral Resource. Total length of DD logged is 2,100m. Total length of RC logged is 37,360m. | ||
| Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation | ● If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. ● If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry. ● For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. ● Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. ● Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. ● Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. | Historic core has been systematically cut lengthwise into half core with a diamond saw. RC samples representing a 1/8 split are taken directly from the rig mounted cyclone by rotary splitter, sample weight is recorded, sample is bagged in pre numbered plastic and sample tickets are inserted and bag is sealed for transport to preparation facility. Generally, one of each of the two control samples (blank or CRM standard) is inserted into the sample stream every tenth sample. An industry standard, documented process of sample mark-up, core splitting, bagging and ticketing and recording is in place at the Mako site. All samples were submitted to external certified analytical laboratory, MSA Bamako. The 3kg sample were considered appropriate sample size for PhotonAssay analysis. MSA prepares the sample by weighing, drying, and crushing the entire sample to >70% passing 2mm, then into jarred up for PhotonAssay. | ||
| Quality of assay data and laboratory tests | ● The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. ● For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. ● Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established. | Au assays are determined by Chrysos Photon assay at MSA labs in Bamako. Laboratory and assay procedures are appropriate for Mineral Resource estimation. QAQC consisted of standards, blanks and laboratory duplicates (both coarse and pulp). The QAQC sample results showed acceptable levels of accuracy and precision. The assay data is considered to be suitable for Mineral Resource estimation. | ||
| Verification of sampling and assaying | ● The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. ● The use of twinned holes. ● Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. ● Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | All aspects of the core sampling, assay procedures and QA/QC program have been reviewed and were judged to be suitable for use in the estimation of Mineral Resources. Drill hole assay result data has been checked against the original hardcopy laboratory assay reports for a representative number of holes. Below detection limit values (negatives) have been replaced by background values. Un-sampled intervals have been retained as un-sampled (null or blank). All of these intervals occur within the waste domain and have no material impact on the estimate. | ||
| Location of data points | ● Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. ● Specification of the grid system used. ● Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | Drill holes have been surveyed by Mako Mine staff surveyors using a Leica GS14, GS15, and GS18 dGPS. Downhole surveys were undertaken by the drilling contractor using a Reflex DeviGyro tool with a reading taken every 3m downhole. Grid system is based on the UTM28N grid on the WGS84 ellipsoid. Survey heights are based on PRS097 (with independent checks on AusPos) and are orthometric (i.e. msl). A topographic surface with 1m resolution has been generated from a Lidar survey of the area. | ||
| Data spacing and distribution | ● Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. ● Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. ● Whether sample compositing has been applied. | There is no Resource estimate on the various prospects to date | ||
| Orientation of data in relation to geological structure | ● Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. ● If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. | Geological structures are interpreted to be steeply-dipping to the north-west. Drilling intersects structures from the north west, generally dipping -60⁰ below horizontal. Drilling primarily targeted shears within volcanics and metasediments. The drilling orientation is adequate for a non-biased assessment of the orebody with respect to interpreted structures and interpreted controls on mineralisation. | ||
| Sample security | ● The measures taken to ensure sample security. | Labelling and submission of samples complies with industry standard. | ||
| Audits or reviews | ● The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. | The competent person audited the sample preparation laboratory in 2024. No material issues were found. | ||
| CRITERIA | JORC CODE EXPLANATION | COMMENTARY | ||
| Mineral tenement and land tenure status | ● Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. ● The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. | The Bantaco Permit is held by SNEPAC SARL. Toro Gold Limited is in a joint Venture with SNEPAC with Toro being the manager and sole funder of the joint Venture. Toro Gold Limited is a company controlled by Resolute Limited. The permit is in good standing. | ||
| Exploration done by other parties | ● Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. | Past exploration has been performed by Ashanti Gold, and Randgold Resources on a previously held Research Permit which was relinquished prior to being held by SNEPAC SARL. Randgold had undertaken soil geochemistry, surface mapping and RAB drilling on the Research Permit. Ashanti Gold undertook RAB and diamond drilling. Subsequently SNEPAC carried out surface geochemistry, auger drilling and RC drilling on the current permit. | ||
| Geology | ● Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. | Mineralisation is currently interpreted to be a standard Birimian orogenic gold deposit style. Gold is related to shears within volcanics and meta-sediments. Intensity of gold mineralisation appears to correlate with the intensity of pyrite development and exhibits lateral and vertical continuity through the mineralised zone. Geometry of the gold mineralisation is generally NNE to NE striking and vertical to steep westerly dipping. The zones vary between 4 and 30m wide. | ||
| Drill hole Information | ● A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth o Whole length. ● If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. | Easting, Northing and RL of the drill hole collars are based on the UTM28N grid on the WGS84 ellipsoid. Survey heights are based on PRS097 (with independent checks on AusPos) and are orthometric (i.e. msl). . Dip is the inclination of the hole from the horizontal. For example, a vertically down drilled hole from the surface is -90°. Azimuth is reported in degrees as the grid direction toward which the hole is drilled. Down hole length of the hole is the distance from the surface to the end of the hole, as measured along the drill trace. Intersection depth is the distance down the hole as measured along the drill trace. Intersection width is the downhole distance of an intersection as measured along the drill trace. Drill hole length is the distance from the surface to the end of the hole, as measured along the drill trace. | ||
| Data aggregation methods | ● In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. ● Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. ● The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. | Sample intervals in this document are all 1m and are not composited in the drill intersections Top-cuts have not been used in the drill intersections. The assay intervals are reported as down hole length as the true width variable is not known. Gold assays are rounded to two decimal places. No metal equivalent reporting is used or applied. | ||
| Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths | ● These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. ● If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. ● If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. 'down hole length, true width not known'). | The intersection width is measured down the hole trace and may not be the true width. All drill results are downhole intervals only due to the variable orientation of the mineralisation. | ||
| Diagrams | ● Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. | A plan view is contained within this document. A table of intercepts is also included in this document. | ||
| Balanced reporting | ● Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. | All significant assay results from Resolute work are provided in this report. The report is considered balanced and provided in context. | ||
| Other substantive exploration data | ● Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. | No other exploration data is considered meaningful and material to this document. | ||
| Further work | ● The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). ● Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. | Future exploration may involve the drilling of more drillholes, both diamond core and reverse circulation, to further extend the mineralised zones and to collect additional detailed data on known mineralized zones. Geophysical exploration is also planned as part of the future exploration of the permit. | ||