(The following statement was released by the rating agency)
LONDON, December 06 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has affirmed SpareBank 1 SMN's (SMN),
SpareBank 1 SR-Bank's (SR) and Sparebanken Vest's (SV) Long-term Issuer Default
Ratings (IDR) at 'A-', Short-term IDRs at 'F2' and Viability Ratings (VRs) at
'a-'. The Outlooks on the Long-term IDRs are Stable.
Fitch has also affirmed SpareBank 1 Nord-Norge's (SNN) Long-term IDR at 'A',
Short-term IDR at 'F1' and VR at 'a'; and Sandnes Sparebank's (Sandnes)
Long-term IDR at 'BBB', Short-term IDR at 'F3' and VR at 'bbb'. The Outlook on
SNN's and Sandnes' Long-term IDRs is Stable. A full list of rating actions is at
the end of this rating action commentary.
KEY RATING DRIVERS- IDRS, VRS AND SENIOR DEBT
The affirmation of SNN's, SMN's, SR's, SV's (collectively Sparebanken) and
Sandnes' ratings, reflects Fitch's view that the banks' sound asset quality will
remain robust even in case of a house price correction.
The Sparebanken's ratings are based on individually strong regional franchises,
sound asset quality, and healthy profitability underpinning internal capital
generation. The ratings also take into account the banks' reliance on wholesale
funding, sharp rises in property prices over recent years, potentially creating
overheating of the market, and relatively concentrated loan books by geography
and by industry sector.
Sandnes' ratings are based on its sound performance, which provides a buffer
against increasing loan impairment charges (LICs), an established but regionally
concentrated franchise, and acceptable asset quality. The latter is affected by
a relatively large portfolio of impaired but still performing loans. The ratings
also factor in the bank's small volume of equity compared with similarly rated
peers.
Improved profitability through margin enhancements has been successful in 2013,
and Fitch expects the high capital requirements introduced in Norway will
continue to support the industry's efforts to reprice the loan book. LICs took
up a modest 5% to 15% of pre-impairment operating profits in 9M13, and Fitch
expects they will remain manageable for the Sparebanken and Sandnes in 2014.
The Sparebanken's sound asset quality underpins the ratings and is supported by
a benign Norwegian operating environment. Fitch expects the banks will maintain
strict underwriting practices and further build buffers to withstand a
correction in house prices. Nevertheless, a sharp fall in the property market
represents a downside risk for the banks. Fitch does not expect such a scenario
to lead to significant deterioration of the quality of the banks' retail
portfolios, although the banks' corporate exposures would be more sensitive to a
correction and possible subsequent economic downturn including a drop in private
consumption.
Sandnes' non-performing loans represented a low 0.7% of gross loans at
end-September 2013. However, it has a relatively significant legacy portfolio in
its SME business, where non-performing plus impaired (but still performing)
loans represented a more material 3.2% at end-September 2013. As the bank is
working out these exposures, changing the business towards less risky business
sectors, Fitch expects the stock of impaired loans to continue to reduce.
Similar to most Nordic peers the Sparebanken and Sandnes rely on wholesale
funding to varying degrees. The Sparebanken have maintained access to domestic
and international funding markets, in particular for covered bonds through
SpareBank 1 Boligkreditt (S1B; a joint funding vehicle of Alliance member banks)
and Sparebanken Vest Boligkreditt (unrated). However, they would be affected by
a prolonged dislocation of the debt capital markets, and Fitch believes that the
banks will retain significant liquidity portfolios to mitigate this risk.
The Sparebanken's capital adequacy ratios, excluding Basel II transitional
floors, compare well with those of international peers, but lag those of their
larger Nordic peers partly due to higher risk weights. Leverage is low in a
European context, with tangible common equity/tangible assets generally between
6%-10% at end-September 2013.
SNN
SNN's VR is currently one notch higher than the other rated Sparebanken. This
reflects its lower dependency on the wholesale markets as part of its funding
structure, wider lending margins due to lower competition, and the presence of a
strong and stable public sector in the region. SNN's asset quality also benefits
from a higher proportion of retail lending than its Alliance partners. However,
its smaller size has led to slightly higher loan concentration as a proportion
of Fitch core capital as well as the proportion of impaired loans to gross
loans. Credit growth in 2012 and 9M13 was relatively high, which could put
pressure on reported capital ratios if it continues.
SMN
SMN's ratings are driven by Fitch's expectation that the bank's asset quality
will remain sound, backed by the diversified economy in mid-Norway. SMN raised
additional capital in 3Q13, although Fitch expects the bank to improve capital
ratios further via retained earnings. Capitalisation and leverage is slightly
weaker than the other rated Alliance banks, although it compares well with
similarly rated peers in an international context.
SR
SR's ratings reflect its strong position in the prosperous western Norway and
Fitch's expectation that asset quality will remain sound. SR is the largest of
the Sparebanken and maintains strong profitability, aided by tight cost control.
Capitalisation is adequate, in Fitch's view, and improving year on year.
Property prices in SR's region have increased more strongly than the national
average, making the bank's asset quality more sensitive to a potential price
correction. The bank is also more sensitive to the oil economy than other
Sparebanken and more reliant on wholesale funding, which makes it more sensitive
to a prolonged dislocation of international wholesale funding markets or a
change in sentiment toward Norwegian issuers.
SV
SV's ratings are underpinned by its sound risk profile and capitalisation.
Around three-quarters of SV's lending related to retail, mainly mortgage,
lending, making the bank sensitive to a house price correction. SV left the
Sparebank 1 Alliance in 2004 and set up jointly owned companies (offering
leasing, insurance and brokerage) with other savings banks. These companies are
now profitable and should continue to improve earnings. Wholesale funding
dependence is significant although the bank has diversified its funding base
through Sparebanken Vest Boligkreditt (its wholly-owned covered bond vehicle).
The higher loan/deposit ratio at SV, compared with the rated Alliance banks, is
driven by the consolidation of its covered bonds issuer, while the Alliance
banks only have minority stakes in S1B.
SANDNES
Sandnes' ratings reflect its established, but regionally concentrated retail and
SME franchise in economically prosperous municipalities around Sandnes in
south-west Norway. The ratings also factor in its reliance on wholesale funding,
working-out of troubled legacy assets and small absolute size of capital. Fitch
considers the bank's property management portfolio, which shows a significant
proportion of exposures in high loan-to-value buckets, as a key risk, which
could put pressure on the bank's ratings. Fitch's expectation is that management
will continue its risk reducing strategy, which should lead to fewer borrower
concentrations in more volatile sectors, and underwriting standards will remain
conservative. Sandnes currently uses the standardised approach to calculate its
capital requirements for both retail and corporate exposures, which leads to
risk weights higher than peers and therefore slightly lower reported capital
ratios. Leverage is relatively low in a European context, with a tangible equity
to tangible assets ratio of 6.7% at end-September 2013, but higher than most
Sparebanken. The bank's small absolute volume of capital makes it vulnerable to
shocks.
RATING SENSITIVITIES - SPAREBANKEN'S VRS, IDRS AND SENIOR DEBT
The Stable Outlooks on the Sparebanken's ratings reflects Fitch's view that
rating action is currently not expected. It factors in Fitch's expectation that
house prices are likely to stabilise or moderately fall in the near term; while
capital ratios and funding structures are strengthening and growth plans are
limited, providing a stronger buffer against unexpected shocks.
An upgrade is currently unlikely given the already high ratings, geographical
concentration and structural reliance on wholesale funding.
The Sparebanken's ratings coul