Fitch Affirms Shinhan Entities; Card's Outlook Revised to Negative
(The following statement was released by the rating agency)
Fitch Ratings-Seoul-September 11: Fitch Ratings has affirmed South Korea-based
Shinhan Bank's (SHB) Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'A' with a Stable
Outlook. Fitch has simultaneously affirmed Shinhan Card Co., Ltd.'s (SHC)
Long-Term IDR at 'A-' but the Outlook has been revised to Negative from Stable.
The rating actions follow their parent Shinhan Financial Group's (SFG) decision
to acquire a 59.2% stake in Orange Life Insurance Co., Ltd. (formerly ING Life
Insurance Korea, Ltd.) for about KRW2.3 trillion on 5 September 2018. Fitch
believes the acquisition will enhance the group's business model, franchise and
earnings in the medium to longer term but at the cost of weaker capitalisation
and higher leverage. A full list of rating actions is at the end of this
commentary.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The different Outlooks on SHB and SHC mainly reflect Fitch's belief of a strong
regulatory bias in Korea towards prioritising the protection of the creditors or
depositors of an operating bank over the creditors of the rest of the holding
company's units. Deploying capital or liquidity directly from the operating bank
to support the other parts of the group, including the holding company, would be
quite onerous in Korea. The Korean regulator has not been hesitant in pressuring
holding companies to strengthen their operating banks' capitalisation at the
parents' cost by issuing debt to inject into the subsidiaries, which often
increased the risk of the bank holding companies' creditors through a higher
common-equity double-leverage ratio.
On the other hand, we think SHC's credit profile is more directly linked to that
of the parent. SHC's ratings are driven by potential support from its parent,
whose credit strength is assessed as greater than SHC's standalone credit
profile. That said, SFG's ability or flexibility to support the credit card
company is weakening as the acquisition is financed mostly by additional Tier 1
capital and senior unsecured debt.
Fitch forecasts the common-equity double-leverage ratio of the bank holding
company could rise to as much as 140% after the acquisition from 126% currently.
We also estimate the group's Fitch Core Capital ratio, which measures its
consolidated capital, will be cut by about 1.1 percentage points. Fitch does not
consider Korea's additional Tier 1 capital to be the same as common equity or
high-quality loss-absorbing capital because the principal absorbs losses only
when the issuer becomes insolvent. We also deduct equity interests in affiliated
insurance businesses from Fitch Core Capital because they relate to life
assurance operations first and foremost and would not be available to absorb
losses in banking operations.
SFG's leverage and capitalisation could further weaken if the parent were to buy
out the remaining minority shareholders of Orange Life and/or inject capital
into its subsidiaries to support growth. The group injected KRW500 billion into
its brokerage arm in 3Q16 to improve its competitiveness.
IDRS, VIABILITY RATING AND SENIOR DEBT - SHB
The bank's IDRs, Viability Rating and senior debt ratings are underpinned by the
bank's strong local franchise and diversified business model as well as its
stable management, which has built a high degree of credibility among major
constituencies by consistently executing strategy to deliver steady performance
through the economic cycle.
Fitch expects SHB's financial profile to remain steady for the next two years,
underpinned by a sound risk-control framework and a stable operating
environment. Fitch believes Korea's high household debt is not a near-term issue
yet as we anticipate a gradual policy rate hike and a steady local property
market over the next few years.
The bank's performance in 1H18 was slightly better than we expected. However, we
anticipate increasing headwinds for the banking system because of rising
uncertainty from global trade tensions.
SFG's acquisition of the life insurer could negatively affect SHB's
capitalisation if it is pressured to pay more dividends in support of its
parent's financial obligation. Nevertheless, we expect SHB's capitalisation to
remain broadly steady in the medium term, mainly because of the local
regulator's position on the safeguarding of operating banks against the risk of
deterioration in preparation for a bail-in regime, which has been delayed in
Korea since 2016.
Fitch believes SHB is somewhat insulated from developments in the other parts of
the group, although the credit risk of the bank cannot be completely de-linked
from the overall credit strength of the group.
SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR - SHB
The bank's Support Rating and Support Rating Floor reflect Fitch's continued
belief of an extremely high probability of support from the Korean government
(AA-/Stable), if required. This is based on SHB's systemic importance as one of
the country's largest commercial banks, holding 13% of the banking system's
total loans and 16% of deposits.
SUBORDINATED DEBT - SHB
SHB's Basel III-compliant Tier 2 debt is rated two notches below the bank's IDR.
This reflects Fitch's poor recovery expectations due to the notes' subordinated
status and because they are to be fully and permanently written off upon hitting
the point of non-viability.
Fitch uses the support-driven IDR or Viability Rating, whichever is higher, as
the anchor rating for Korea's systemically important banks' Tier 2 instruments,
including those of SHB. This is because the Tier 2 instruments will be
non-performing or will reach a point of non-viability when the issuing bank
becomes insolvent or defaults. This is similar to the point at which senior debt
is considered to be in default. However, Fitch expects the government to provide
pre-emptive support to avoid insolvency. SHB's notes have minimal
non-performance risk relative to its senior unsecured debt.
For more details on Fitch's approach to rating Basel III-compliant Tier 2 notes,
see Fitch:
Korean Basel III Terms Become More Creditor Friendly /a , dated 26 September
2014.
IDRS AND SUPPORT RATING - SHC
SHC's IDRs and Support Rating reflect Fitch's belief that its parent SFG would
provide support to SHC, if needed. Fitch sees SHC's credit card operation as an
integral part of SFG's commercial-banking franchise, which has become more
retail-based in the past few years. The group's business model and competitive
position would be altered significantly without SHC in light of its 20%-30%
contribution to SFG's profit for several years.
Fitch believes the local regulator would favour support of SHC by SFG, similar
to its actions during Korea's credit card crisis in 2003, due to the strong
synergies with SHC in the retail banking operation and the importance of the
credit card industry to Korea's economy. The country's credit card transaction
volume reached over 70% of private consumption in 2017. SHC is the largest
credit card company with about 20% of Korea's total domestic credit card
transactions in 2017.
The Negative Outlook on the Long-Term IDR reflects the weakening ability or
flexibility of SFG to support the credit card company.
RATING SENSITIVITIES
IDRS, VIABILITY RATING AND SENIOR DEBT - SHB
The bank's IDRs, Viability Rating and senior debt ratings are sensitive to a
change in Fitch's assumptions about its management, risk appetite and
capitalisation.
The ratings could be downgraded if there is a significant increase in the bank's
risk appetite, including rapid growth or weakened loan quality, leading to
erosion of its capitalisation. Downgrade action could also be triggered,
contrary to our expectation, if there is any sign of significant weakening in
the bank's capitalisation (or increase in the bank's dividend burden) due to
developments in other parts of the group.
Downside to the IDR is limited to one notch, as SHB's Support Rating Floor is
'A-'.
The ratings are unlikely to be upgraded in the near term in light of the
weakening financial flexibility of its parent, SFG.
SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR - SHB
The Support Rating and Support Rating Floor may be sensitive to any change in
Fitch's assumptions about the propensity or ability of the Korean authorities to
provide timely support to the bank. This might arise if there is a change in the
authorities' ability to provide support.
Furthermore, global regulatory initiatives aimed at lowering implicit government
support available to banks may cause downward pressure on the ratings. The local
regulator may revise its resolution framework to add a bail-in feature. However,
it remains to be seen how strong the language will be and how feasible it will
be to enforce a bail-in in practice. The timeline for this change remains
unclear as the revision has already been delayed since late 2016.
SUBORDINATED DEBT - SHB
The ratings on the Basel III-compliant Tier 2 securities are sensitive to the
same considerations that might affect SHB's Long-Term IDR, which is driven by
its Viability Rating.
IDRS AND SUPPORT RATING - SHC
SHC's IDRs and Support Rating are sensitive to any change in assumptions around
the propensity or ability of SFG and SHB to provide timely support.
The ratings could be downgraded if there is no sign of a noticeable and
significant improvement in SFG's capitalisation and common-equity double
leverage in a few years. Fitch may also take rating action if there is a change
in SHB's IDRs or SHC's relationship with SFG and SHB.
Given the Negative Outlook, a rating upgrade is improbable for the foreseeable
future.
The rating actions are as follows:
SHB
Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR affirmed at 'A'; Outlook Stable
Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR affirmed at 'F1'
Viability Rating affirmed at 'a'
Support Rating affirmed at '1'
Support Rating Floor affirmed at 'A-'
Long-term senior unsecured debt affirmed at 'A'
Subordinated Basel III compliant Tier 2 debt affirmed at 'BBB+'
SHC
Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR affirmed at 'A-'; Outlook revised to Negative
from Stable
Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR affirmed at 'F1'
Support Rating affirmed at '1'
Contact:
Primary Analysts
Heakyu Chang (SHB)
Senior Director
+82 2 3278 8363
Fitch Australia Pty Ltd, Korea Branch
9F Kyobo Securities Building
97, Uisadang-daero, Yeongdeungpo-Gu
Seoul 07327, South Korea
Matt Choi (SHC)
Associate Director
+82 2 3278 8372
Secondary Analysts
Matt Choi (SHB)
Associate Director
+82 2 3278 8372
Jonathan Lee (SHC)
Managing Director
+886 2 8175 7601
Committee Chairperson
Wee Siang Ng, CFA
Senior Director
+65 6796 7230
Summary of Financial Statement Adjustments - Fitch also considered SHB's
risk-weighted assets before the capital floor charge, which is harsher than for
international peers because of stricter capital deduction requirements under
Korea's regulatory framework.
Media Relations: Wai-Lun Wan, Hong Kong, Tel: +852 2263 9935 , Email:
wailun.wan@fitchratings.com.
Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com
Applicable Criteria
Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 22 Jun 2018)
https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10034713
Non-Bank Financial Institutions Rating Criteria (pub. 22 Jun 2018)
https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10034715
Additional Disclosures
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
https://www.fitchratings.com/site/dodd-frank-disclosure/10043926
Solicitation Status
https://www.fitchratings.com/site/pr/10043926#solicitation
Endorsement Policy
https://www.fitchratings.com/regulatory
ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS.
PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK:
HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING
DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S
PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND
METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF
CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE,
AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF
CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE
AVAILABLE AT HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/SITE/REGULATORY. FITCH MAY HAVE
PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD
PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED
IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS
ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.
Copyright © 2018 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its
subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824,
(212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or
in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and
maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast
information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and
underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch
conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it
in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification
of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are
available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's
factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains
will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the
requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is
offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of
relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its
advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as
audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports,
engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties,
the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources
with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the
issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports
should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any
third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on
in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete.
Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the
information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and
other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the
work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial
statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings
and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking
and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature
cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current
facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that
were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or
warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or
any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the
report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security.
This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and
methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore,
ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual,
or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The
rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk,
unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or
sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals
identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible
for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes
only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute
for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer
and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be
changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch.
Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a
recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the
adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular
investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to
any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other
obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from
US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In
certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular
issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a
single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000
(or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or
dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to
use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed
under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act
of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular
jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and
distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to
three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd
holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which
authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit
ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who
are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001
Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the
"NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on
Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on
behalf of the NRSRO (see https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory), other
credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and
therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf
of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit
ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO