For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
http://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20240216:nRSP4183Da&default-theme=true
RNS Number : 4183D Sylvania Platinum Limited 16 February 2024
16 February 2024
Sylvania Platinum Limited
("Sylvania", the "Company" or the "Group")
Results of Updated Mineral Resource Estimates for Northern Limb Mineral Assets
Sylvania (AIM:SLP), the platinum group metals ("PGM") producer and developer
with assets in South Africa, is pleased to announce the updated Mineral
Resource Estimates ("MRE") for its Volspruit Project located on the Northern
Limb of the Bushveld Complex in South Africa.
The results include revised MREs for the Volspruit North and Volspruit South
ore bodies, including for rhodium ("Rh") and ruthenium ("Ru"), both of which
had previously not been assayed. The MRE is in line with the JORC (2012)
Standard as a whole.
Highlights
Volspruit North
· Volspruit North JORC MRE (Indicated):
o 16.42 million tonnes ("Mt") at a 4E (4E includes platinum ("Pt"),
palladium ("Pd"), Rh and gold ("Au")) grade of 2.52 grams per tonne ("g/t");
o 1.33 million 4E ounces at a grade of 2.52 g/t;
o 21.94 million pounds ("lb") of copper ("Cu") at a grade of 0.07%;
o 61.50 million lb of nickel ("Ni") at a grade of 0.18%;
o The MRE represents a 10% increase in the indicated tonnage from the
previously reported MRE (October 2022) resulting from a more defined
geological modelling exercise that has also resulted in the 4E grade improving
by 4%; and
o The addition of Rh estimates has improved the overall grade by
approximately 7%.
Volspruit South
· Volspruit South JORC MRE (Inferred):
o 10.60 Mt at 4E grade of 2.11 g/t;
o 14.83 million lb of Cu at a grade of 0.06%;
o 46.96 million lb of Ni at a grade of 0.20%;
o This MRE is the first one completed since the mineralised zones have been
redefined and, as expected, it reports approximately a third of the tonnages
at almost double the grades previously reported by Integrated Geological
Solutions (Pty) Ltd ("IGS") in 2012.
Next Steps
The Company has embarked on a Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") of the
Volspruit Project in order to assess what value the addition of the Volspruit
South resources, and the Rh and Ru resources might add to the overall project.
Metallurgical test work is being undertaken on fresh core that was drilled
during the course of the 2023 calendar year. Based on the results of the
scoping study and metallurgical test work that is expected during Q4 FY2024 a
decision will be made on progressing the project to a pre-feasibility study
phase during FY2025.
Jaco Prinsloo, CEO of Sylvania, commented:
"I am pleased to announce the successful completion of the Mineral Resource
Estimate update at our Volspruit Project, facilitated by Earthlab Technical
Division, a South African geological consulting company. The exploration
results align with our strategic goals, emphasising the importance of
exploration assets as a key driver for Sylvania Platinum's growth strategy.
"The updated geological model reveals a notable 10% increase in the Volspruit
North MRE compared to the October 2022 publication, accompanied by improved
overall grades. These enhancements result from a more constrained geological
model based on interpreted mineralised zones.
"Our commitment to meeting investment and workstream requirements for existing
Mining Rights remains steadfast, with specialist teams actively working on
authorisations, including the Water Use Licence, Environmental Impact
Assessment update, and finalisation of the amended Social and Labour Plan.
"The previously declared Measured Resources for Volspruit North were
downgraded to the Indicated category as a result of the short-range
variability between closely spaced boreholes being highlighted during the reef
redefining exercise. This serves to demonstrate that while our understanding
of the resource is improving, we are also able to identify where future
efforts will need to be focussed. Resources for Volspruit South are
currently categorised as Inferred due to structural complexity and sparse
drilling data.
"In conclusion, the updated Mineral Resource Estimates demonstrate the
positive impact of our optimisation efforts at the Volspruit Project. We are
optimistic about the future value these results will bring to our stakeholders
and are committed to further exploration activities in FY2024 to unlock
additional value from our existing mining rights. We anticipate sharing
further updates in the near future."
Further Information
The Volspruit PGM-Ni-Cu Project located within the Northern Limb of the
Bushveld Igneous Complex in South Africa is covered by approved Mining Rights
held by Sylvania.
Volspruit Project
The Company initiated a Mineral Resource Estimate update with the assistance
of Earthlab Technical Division ("Earthlab"), a mining and exploration
consulting company, at the Volspruit Project. The primary objective was to
apply the revised definition of the mineralised zones to the historic borehole
core to better define the Volspruit North resource estimate and redefine the
Volspruit South resource estimate. Statistical regression techniques were
utilised to estimate the Rh and Ru content of both ore bodies.
The newly defined geological model shows an increase of 10% on the previously
published MRE in October 2022 for Volspruit North as well as an improvement of
the overall grades. These improvements are the result of the more constrained
geological model defined by the interpreted mineralised zones. The historical
MRE for Volspruit South was reduced significantly in terms of tonnage,
however, the improvement in the overall grade warrants the remodelling and
highlights the fact that mineralised zones do exist within the larger
low-grade ore body that had previously been modelled.
Rh and Ru values were estimated for both ore bodies after statistical analysis
proved a strong relationship between Pt, Pd and Au, and Rh and Ru values. This
allowed for regression methods to be utilised to estimate these missing
values. It should be noted that regression techniques are commonly utilised
and are based on a smaller set of samples that have been analysed for the
missing elements to which a relationship is then established. The improvement
to the overall grades is in line with expectations.
We continue to meet the investment and workstream requirements relating to the
permits under the existing Mining Right, with specialist technical teams
currently working on the authorisations. These authorisations include the
Water Use Licence for the mining and on-site processing of the ore, updating
of the Environmental Impact Assessment and the finalisation of the amended
Social and Labour Plan ("SLP") which will update the Local Economic
Development ("LED") project that is included in the Mining Right held by the
Company.
Mineral Resource Estimate
Tables 1 and 3 show the Volspruit North and Volspruit South mineral resource
tons and grades respectively in g/t of Pt, Pd, Rh, and Au, summed up as 4E
grade, as well as Ru in g/t and Cu and Ni as percentages. The tons and the
metal content are reported on a 100% attributable basis for all the PGMs and
Base Metals (Tables 2 and 4). The tables furthermore divide the tons, ounces,
and contained base metals into two Resource Classifications for Volspruit
North and one Resource Classification for Volspruit South as per the JORC Code
(2012). The categories in decreasing confidence levels are Measured, Indicated
and Inferred categories. No Measured resources have been declared.
A significantly large proportion of the 4E oz (93%) of Volspruit North reports
to the Indicated category. The Inferred Mineral Resources are attributed to
faulting resulting in areas of structural complexity and less geological
confidence as well as limited drilling closer to the Nyl River. The previously
declared Measured resources were downgraded to the Indicated category as a
result of short-range variability being observed between the closely spaced
boreholes. This serves to highlight that whilst our understanding of the ore
body continues to improve through these relogging exercises, areas requiring
additional information are being highlighted allowing us to focus future
drilling programmes.
At this stage, the entire Volspruit South resource reports to the Inferred
category due to the high structural complexity observed in the area coupled
with sparse drilling data.
Table 1: Volspruit North Mineral Resources and grades at a 100% attributable
basis
Mineral Resource Class Tonnage (t) Pt (g/t) Pd (g/t) Rh (g/t) Ru (g/t) Au (g/t) 4E (g/t) Cu (g/t) Ni (g/t)
Indicated 16,418,975 1.09 1.22 0.16 0.05 0.05 2.52 0.07 0.18
Inferred 1,225,236 1.07 1.17 0.15 0.05 0.06 2.45 0.07 0.18
Total 17,644,211 1.9 1.22 0.16 0.05 0.05 2.52 0.07 0.18
Table 2: Volspruit North Mineral Resources and metal content at a 100%
attributable basis
Mineral Resource Class Tonnage(t) Pt (oz) Pd (oz) Rh (oz) Ru (oz) Au (oz) 4E (oz) Cu (lb) Ni (lb)
Indicated 16,418,975 576,117 646,494 83,842 26,333 28,447 1,334,900 21,944,617 61,489,452
Inferred 1,225,236 42,249 46,015 5,949 1,907 2,229 96,442 1,908,803 4,712,494
Total 17,644,211 618,366 692,509 89,791 28,240 30,676 1,431,342 23,853,420 66,201,946
Table 3: Volspruit South Body Mineral Resources and grades at a 100%
attributable basis
Mineral Resource Class Tonnage (t) Pt (g/t) Pd (g/t) Rh (g/t) Ru (g/t) Au (g/t) 4E (g/t) Cu (g/t) Ni (g/t)
Inferred 10,597,928 1.08 0.87 0.11 0.05 0.05 2.11 0.06 0.20
Total 10,597,928 1.08 0.87 0.11 0.05 0.05 2.11 0.06 0.20
Table 4: Volspruit South Mineral Resources and metal content at a 100%
attributable basis
Mineral Resource Class Tonnage (t) Pt (oz) Pd (oz) Rh (oz) Ru (oz) Au (oz) 4E (oz) Cu (lb) Ni (lb)
Inferred 10,597,928 367,832 298,062 37,052 16,851 15,876 718,822 14,829,588 46,964,037
Total 10,597,928 367,832 298,062 37,052 16,851 15,876 718,822 14,829,588 46,964,037
Notes relevant to all Mineral Resource tables:
· Rounding of numbers may lead to computational discrepancies;
· Mineral Resources are reported as in-situ, without any dilution
from immediate hanging wall or footwall waste;
· A 10% geological loss factor has been applied to the tonnages;
· A cut-off grade of 1.2g/t (4E) was applied at a sample level; no
cut-off grade was applied at the block model level.
CONTACT DETAILS
For further information, please contact:
Jaco Prinsloo CEO Lewanne Carminati CFO +27 11 673 1171
Nominated Adviser and Broker
Liberum Capital Limited +44 (0) 20 3100 2000
Richard Crawley / Scott Mathieson
Communications
BlytheRay +44 (0) 20 7138 3205
Tim Blythe / Megan Ray sylvania@BlytheRay.com (mailto:sylvania@BlytheRay.com)
CORPORATE INFORMATION
Registered and postal address: Sylvania Platinum Limited
Clarendon House
2 Church Street
Hamilton HM 11
Bermuda
SA Operations postal address: PO Box 976
Florida Hills, 1716
South Africa
Sylvania Website: www.sylvaniaplatinum.com
(http://www.sylvaniaplatinum.com/)
About Sylvania Platinum Limited
Sylvania Platinum is a lower-cost producer of platinum group metals (PGM)
(platinum, palladium and rhodium) with operations located in South Africa. The
Sylvania Dump Operations (SDO) comprises six chrome beneficiation and PGM
processing plants focusing on the retreatment of PGM-rich chrome tailings
materials from mines in the Bushveld Igneous Complex. The SDO is the largest
PGM producer from chrome tailings re-treatment in the industry. Additionally,
the Thaba JV comprises chrome beneficiation and PGM processing plants, which
will treat a combination of run of mine (ROM) and historical chrome tailings
from the JV partner, adding a full margin chromite concentrate revenue stream.
The Group also holds mining rights for PGM projects in the Northern Limb of
the Bushveld Complex.
For more information visit https://www.sylvaniaplatinum.com/
(https://www.sylvaniaplatinum.com/)
The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to
constitute inside information for the purposes of Article 7 of Regulation (EU)
no.596/2014 as amended by the Market Abuse (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations
2019.
For the purposes of MAR and Article 2 of Commission Implementing Regulation
(EU) 2016/1055, this announcement is being made on behalf of the Company by
Jaco Prinsloo.
In accordance with the AIM Rules - Note for Mining and Oil & Gas
Companies, the information contained in this announcement has been reviewed
and signed off by Mr. Deon du Plessis, a qualified professional Geologist
(Pr.Sci.Nat. - 400050/05) and Fellow with the Geological Society of South
Africa (FGSSA - 963338), who has over 21 years' relevant experience within the
mining sector.
ANNEXURE
GLOSSARY OF TERMS - Results of Optimisation Studies for Northern Limb Mineral
Assets The following definitions apply throughout the announcement:
Mineral Resource Estimate - The process of subjecting known geological
evidence and knowledge required for the estimation of Mineral Resources, and
must include sampling data of a type, and at spacings, appropriate to the
geological, chemical, physical, and mineralogical complexity of the mineral
occurrence, for all classifications of Inferred, Indicated and Measured
Mineral Resources. A Mineral Resource cannot be estimated in the absence of
sampling information. Any adjustment made to the data for the purpose of
making the Mineral Resource estimate, for example by cutting or factoring
grades, should be clearly stated and described in the Public Report.
MRE
3E PGMs 3E ounces include the precious metal elements platinum, palladium and gold
4E PGMs 4E ounces include the precious metal elements platinum, palladium, rhodium
and gold
A comprehensive technical and economic study of the selected development
option for a mineral project that includes appropriately detailed assessments
of applicable Modifying Factors together with any other relevant operational
factors and detailed financial analysis that are necessary to demonstrate at
the time of reporting that extraction is reasonably justified (economically
mineable). The results of the study may reasonably serve as the basis for a
final decision by a proponent or financial institution to proceed with, or
finance, the development of the project. The confidence level of the study
will be higher than that of a Pre-Feasibility Study.
Feasibility Study
A geological loss is an area or volume with no reef or ore developed due to
disruption by a geological feature. Geological loss is expressed as a
percentage by which a Mineral Resource is discounted and is based on the
geological condition of an orebody. There are two types termed "Known" and
"Unknown" losses. Mineral Resources are discounted by the total geological
losses. A Known geological loss is known/expected before mining takes place,
and is often indicated by remote sensing, or is the extension of a feature,
which has been exposed by current mining activities. These types of geological
features are in general occurrences of a linear type of features (examples
include faults, dykes, shear zones, and other localised features). Unknown
geological losses are generally associated with those features which have not
been determined by various
geophysical techniques.
Geoloss
An 'Indicated Mineral Resource' is that part of a Mineral Resource for which
quantity, grade (or quality), densities, shape and physical characteristics
are estimated with sufficient confidence to allow the application of Modifying
Factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the
economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from
adequately detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing gathered
through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches,
pits, workings and drill holes, and is sufficient to assume geological and
grade (or quality) continuity between points of observation where data and
samples are gathered. An Indicated Mineral Resource has a lower level of
confidence than that applying to a Measured Mineral Resource and may only be
converted to a Probable Ore Reserve.
Indicated
An 'Inferred Mineral Resource' is that part of a Mineral Resource for which
quantity and grade (or quality) are estimated on the basis of limited
geological evidence and sampling. Geological evidence is sufficient to imply
but not verify geological and grade (or quality) continuity. It is based on
exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate
techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill
holes. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that
applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to an Ore
Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral
Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued
exploration.
Inferred
Joint Ore Reserves Committee - The Australian Code for Reporting of
Exploration Results, Mineral
Resources and Ore Reserves ('the JORC Code') is a professional code of
JORC practice that sets minimum standards for Public Reporting of Exploration
Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves.
A 'Measured Mineral Resource' is that part of a Mineral Resource for which
quantity, grade (or quality), densities, shape, and physical characteristics
are estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the application of Modifying
Factors to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic
viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from detailed and
reliable exploration, sampling and testing gathered through appropriate
techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill
holes, and is sufficient to confirm geological and grade (or quality)
continuity between points of observation where data and samples are gathered.
A Measured Mineral Resource has a higher level of confidence than that
applying to either an Indicated Mineral Resource or an Inferred Mineral
Resource. It may be converted to a Proven Ore Reserve or under certain
circumstances to a Probable Ore Reserve.
Measured
PGM-Ni-Cu Platinum Group Elements, Nickel and Copper
Resource Classification Defined as classes or categories as per the JORC Code (2012) in decreasing
confidence levels as Measured, Indicated and Inferred.
An order of magnitude technical and economic study of the potential viability
of Mineral Resources. It includes appropriate assessments of realistically
assumed Modifying Factors together with any other relevant operational factors
that are necessary to demonstrate at the time of reporting that progress to a
Pre-Feasibility Study can be reasonably justified.
Scoping Study
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
. END MSCQKABPPBKKPBD