REG - Thor Energy PLC - Uranium Drilling
09/12/2024 07:00
For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
https://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20241209:nRSI2350Pa&default-theme=true
RNS Number : 2350P Thor Energy PLC 09 December 2024
9 December 2024
Thor Energy
("Thor" or the "Company")
Uranium Drilling - Groundhog, Colorado USA
Narrow, High-Grade Extends Known Mineralisation 100m to the North and 300m to
the East
Thor Energy PLC ("Thor") (AIM, ASX: THR, OTCQB: THORF) is pleased to report
downhole gamma logging results (eU(3)O(8)) from a recently completed drilling
programme at the Groundhog Project in Colorado, USA, nine (9) Reverse
Circulation ("RC") drillholes totalling 979m were completed at Groundhog Mine
Prospect. Drilling was designed to test areas along strike of uranium and
vanadium mineralisation from Thor's successful 2022 and 2023 drilling
programs.
Highlights:
· Shallow, narrow, high-grade uranium mineralisation intersected
with uranium grades from downhole gamma logging up to 0.16% (0.5m @ 1574ppm)
eU(3)O(8) in 24WBRA009 at 114m extends the known mineralisation 100m to the
North.
· Shallow, narrow, high-grade uranium mineralisation intersected
with uranium grades from downhole gamma logging up to 0.06% (0.6m @ 643ppm)
eU(3)O(8) in 24WBRA007 at 109m extends the known mineralisation 300m to the
East.
· Shallow, narrow, high-grade uranium mineralisation intersected
with uranium grades from downhole gamma logging up to 0.11% (0.3m @ 1062ppm)
eU(3)O(8) in 24WBRA001 at 83m.
· Drill programme halted due to heavy early-season snow. Thor has
permits to continue drilling across the Wedding Bell Project in 2025,
including Rimrock Mine Prospect, Groundhog and Section 23 prospects.
Alastair Clayton, Executive Chairman, commented: "These Saltwash-style Uranium
deposits typically pinch and swell over relatively small distances, so we are
pleased to have extended the known mineralised footprint by so much. On the
flip side, we are ideally targeting high-grade horizons of several meters in
width, so the intersections indicated in gamma logging from this programme are
narrower than we had hoped. With the Colorado winter arriving early, we will
look to outline our next steps once the thaw begins in Spring."
Figure 1: Groundhog Drillhole Location Plan. Extensional holes highlighted in green.
Table A: Drill Collar
Drillhole Easting Northing Elevation (m) Total Depth (m) Azimuth Inclination
24WBRA001 688092 4223970 2091 104 360 -80
24WBRA002 688093 4223969 2091 104 90 -80
24WBRA003 688092 4223968 2091 104 180 -80
24WBRA004 688092 4223969 2091 104 270 -80
24WBRA005 688144 4224065 2088 102 360 -90
24WBRA006 688135 4224093 2091 104 360 -90
24WBRA007 688788 4223957 2095 116 360 -90
24WBRA008 688128 4224077 2091 113 360 -90
24WBRA009 688117 4224206 2116 130 360 -90
1. WGS84 Zone 12
Table B: Drillhole Results (100ppm Cutoff)
Drillhole Name Interval (m) EU308 % eU308 ppm Depth (m)
24WBRA 001 0.8 0.06 619 82
including 0.3 0.11 1062 83
24WBRA 002 0.5 0.02 162 82
24WBRA 003 0.5 0.02 216 81
24WBRA 004 No grade above 100ppm
24WBRA 005 1.4 0.013 132 79
including 0.6 0.018 180 79
Hit workings at 279 ft
24WBRA 006 0.6 0.01 110 58
and 0.5 0.02 202 91
and 0.6 0.01 147 94
24WBRA 007 0.6 0.06 643 109
24WBRA 008 0.6 0.01 116 90
24WBRA 009 1.4 0.05 450 114
including 0.5 0.16 1574 114
and 0.5 0.04 426 116
The Board of Thor Energy Plc has approved this announcement and authorised its
release.
For further information on the Company, please visit the website
(https://thorenergyplc.com/) or please contact the following:
Thor Energy PLC
Alastair Clayton, Executive Chairman
Rowan Harland, Company Secretary
Tel: +61 (8) 6555 2950
Zeus Capital Limited (Nominated Adviser and Joint Broker)
Antonio Bossi / Darshan Patel
Tel: +44 (0) 203 829 5000
SI Capital Limited (Joint Broker)
Nick Emerson
Tel: +44 (0) 1483 413 500
Yellow Jersey (Financial PR)
Dom Barretto / Shivantha Thambirajah / Bessie Elliot
thor@yellowjerseypr.com (mailto:thor@yellowjerseypr.com)
Tel: +44 (0) 20 3004 9512
About Thor Energy Plc:
The Company is focused on uranium, energy metals and recently Hydrogen and
Helium that are crucial in the shift to a clean energy economy.
The Company notes that for the relevant market announcements noted above, it
is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects this
information and that all material assumptions and technical parameters
underpinning any estimates continue to apply and have not materially changed.
For further information on Thor Energy and to see an overview of its projects,
please visit the Company's website at www.thorenergyplc.com.
1. JORC Code, 2012 Edition - Table 1
1. Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling techniques · Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random Reverse circulation drill samples were collected off the cyclone at 5ft (1.5m)
chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate intervals and split to 3kg
to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or
handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting An pXRF (Olympus Vanta Series C) and scintillometer reading was taken for each
the broad meaning of sampling. sample.
· Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample All the holes were electric-logged (e-logged), on a call-out basis, by Hawkins
representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or CBM Logging Inc. from Cody Wyoming. Hawkins followed industry standards for
systems used. probing holes on uranium properties. They calibrate their gamma probes at
the Department of Energy test pits located in Casper, Wyoming. Logs run were
· Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are natural gamma, single point resistivity (SPR), self-potential (SP), deep and
Material to the Public Report. medium induction resistivity (DIR and MIR), and selected holes had directional
surveys done. First-pass logging speeds were 35 ft (10.7m)/minute and for
· In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done gamma reruns, logging rates were 15 ft (4.6m)/minute. On first-pass runs
this would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to gamma readings were taken every 0.3 ft (10cm), and for reruns, every 0.1 ft
obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for (3.0cm).
fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where
there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities
or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of
detailed information.
Drilling techniques · Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole Track mounted reverse circulation rig (hole diameter 6 inches).
hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core
diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit
or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
Drill sample recovery · Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample Sample recovery was good with no variation within mineralised zones. Each
recoveries and results assessed. drill cutting pile size is logged and any deviation from expected was raised
with the driller, and if undersize, to check for blockages.
· Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure
representative nature of the samples. No sample biases expected, and no relationship is known to exist between
sample recovery and grade.
· Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery
and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential
loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
Logging · Whether core and chip samples have been geologically All chip samples are qualitatively geologically logged (lithology, structure,
and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral alteration, veining, mineralisation (based on scintillometer cps for each
Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. interval), weathering, colour and other features).
· Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in No mineral resource estimation, mining studies or metallurgical studies have
nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. been conducted at this stage, but samples have been logged in sufficient
detail to use for this function.
· The total length and percentage of the relevant
intersections logged. During the logging process representative samples are stored in chip trays for
future reference. The RC chip trays are photographed and electronically
stored.
Sub- sampling techniques and sample preparation · If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half Samples were collected as described in the above sampling technique section.
or all core taken.
· If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary
split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. No assays reported. Physical samples yet to assayed.
· For all sample types, the nature, quality and All holes e-logged by Hawkins CBN Logging inc.
appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.
· Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling
stages to maximise representivity of samples.
· Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is
representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance
results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.
· Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size
of the material being sampled.
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests · The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying No Assays Reported
and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial
or total. All the holes were electric-logged (e-logged), probes are calibrate at the
Department of Energy test pits located in Casper, Wyoming. Logs run were
· For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF natural gamma, resistivityand conductivity. All holes had diectional surveys
instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including done. The logging speed was 30ft (9.1m)/minute. Sample intervals were every
instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and 0.1ft (3 cm).
their derivation, etc.
Handheld pXRF readings
· Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg
standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether readings are taken on -2mm sieved samples on every drill metre, using an
acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been Olympus vanta Series C with a 40 second reading time.
established.
Instrument is calibrated at start of each day, along with QAQC of 1 standard
and 1 blank. External instrument calibration completed annually.
Verification of sampling and assaying · The verification of significant intersections by either independent All significant intersections have been verified by an onsite geologist.
or alternative company personnel.
There are no twinned drillholes.
· The use of twinned holes.
All drilling data is collected in a series of templates in excel including
· Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data geological logging, sample information, collar and survey information.
verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
All data is digitally recorded in the company's electronic database, managed
· Discuss any adjustment to assay data. by external database company utilising Datashed5 software.
Location of data points · Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar Drill collars were surveyed using a handheld Garmin 64 GPS with an accuracy of
and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in +/-3m. Grid system is WGS84 UTM zone 12. All holes were vertical
Mineral Resource estimation.
Topographic control using the GPS is suitable for early- stage exploration.
· Specification of the grid system used.
· Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
Data spacing and distribution · Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Data spacing for preliminary exploration work is deemed sufficient on a
first-pass basis to assess areas of potential. Such areas of potential may
· Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish be further assessed by more detailed work.
the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications
applied.
· Whether sample compositing has been applied.
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure · Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of Orientational bias is not applicable to the drilling at this stage but samples
possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the and drill lines were orientated approximately perpendicular to the assumed
deposit type. strike of mineralisation. The vertical holes were oriented approximately
perpendicular to the very gently NE dipping stratabound mineralization.
· If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the
orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a
sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.
Sample security · The measures taken to ensure sample security. Samples are kept in a secure facility.
Sample Security levels are considered appropriate for RC Drilling.
Audits or reviews · The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and None undertaken. Thor's sampling procedure conforms to industry standard
data. practice and each assay program is reviewed internally for any
discrepancies.
1.1 Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status · Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including Mineral rights are held by the U.S. Government, who transfers those rights to
agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, holders of valid mining claims located on open ground through the General
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, Mining Law of 1872, as amended by other Federal, State and County
wilderness or national park and environmental settings. regulations. Claim holders, with a few exceptions that don't apply to this
project, must make annual payments to the government to maintain their
· The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any rights. Holder of valid claims can transfer their rights to others.
known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. Surface ownership is also by the U.S. and managed by the Bureau of Land
Management.
Thor's property position consists of 199 unpatented mining claims (approx.
1,663Ha), leased from underlying owners.
As long as Thor meets its' contractual obligations and keeps the claims in
good standing with the US, then the security of tenure should be good.
Depending on the location of the drill holes, the license to operate in the
area is a function of permitting at differing levels of government (Local,
State and Federal). The holes were in San Miguel County. In addition to the
normal State and Federal permitting San Miguel imposes its own set of
regulations. To date, Thor has met those permitting requirements.
Exploration done by other parties · Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. There are no systems of consistent data archiving for mineral exploration or
exploitation done under the Mining Law on Federal or on other lands within the
State of Colorado. Furthermore, with some exceptions, there was not, nor is
not, a requirement that explorers provide copies of their data to governmental
agencies. That data was retained by private entities. It now exists in a
piecemeal manner, with the data having been discarded, abandoned or available
by vendors that managed to acquire and store some of it over the years.
Thor's properties have bountiful surface evidence of historic drill
exploration, and in some cases, mining exploitation, which appears to be
mostly from the 1950's through the early 1970's. There are several mines
located in the western portion of the property. Unpublished reports list
these mines as producing, in aggregate, over 700,000 lbs (318,181 kg) of
uranium. To the author's knowledge, very little of the historic drilling or
mining data is available to Thor, and certainly not enough to help guide an
exploration program. Antecdotal evidence suggests that some of the work on
the property was done by Union Carbide (now defunct), the largest company that
worked in the Uravan Mineral Belt.
Geology · Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. According to the USGS Bulletin 1693 (Cox, D.P., and Singer, D. A., eds.,
1986), the Deposit Model for the project is Sandstone Uranium - Tabular
subtype.
Drill hole Information · A summary of all information material to the understanding of the Tables, plans and sections summarising significant drill results are included
exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for in the report
all Material drill holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the
drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.
· If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that
the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why
this is the case.
Data aggregation methods · In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, Gamma data was aggregated to determine equivalent uranium oxide grades (%
maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and eU3O8), thicknesses and base of mineralization. Uranium grades and thicknesses
cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. were based on a method originally devised by the AEC, which is a manual
graphic method based on the shape of the gamma curve on an e-log. It
· Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade consists of, for a single peak, determining the cps for the peak, and using
results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such one-half that value to determine the upper mineralization boundary.
aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations Successive cps picks on 0.5 ft (15.2cm) intervals are taken until the last
should be shown in detail. interval drops below the one-half peak value. This is the lower
mineralization boundary. These boundary values, plus the intervening 0.5 ft
· assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent (15.2cm) interval values, are used, in conjuction with parameters such as hole
diameter, whether or not the hole is dry or water-filled, if the hole is
· The values should be clearly stated. probed in an open or cased or through drill steel, gamma detector dead time
and tool specific K factors, to arrive at a grade in %eU3O8, thickness and the
base of mineralization, of each peak. Slight modifications to the method are
made if more than one peak occurs close together.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths · These relationships are particularly important in the reporting All results are assumed to be true width but is not definitively known at this
of Exploration Results. stage.
· If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill
hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.
· If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported,
there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true
width not known').
Diagrams · Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of Appropriate maps and sections are included in the report.
intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported
These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
locations and appropriate sectional views.
Balanced reporting · Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not All results have been reported
practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or
widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration
Results.
Other substantive exploration data · Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be No meaningful or material information has been omitted from this release.
reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical
survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical
and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
Further work · The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral The drill results suggest that several areas of potentially economic
extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step- out drilling). mineralization could be investigated in greater detail. A couple of these
areas have had historic mining in the vicinity. Maps of where they mined are
· Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, scarce, so any delineation work needs to be cognisant of that mining
including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas,
provided this information is not commercially sensitive.
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status
· Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including
agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites,
wilderness or national park and environmental settings.
· The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any
known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
Mineral rights are held by the U.S. Government, who transfers those rights to
holders of valid mining claims located on open ground through the General
Mining Law of 1872, as amended by other Federal, State and County
regulations. Claim holders, with a few exceptions that don't apply to this
project, must make annual payments to the government to maintain their
rights. Holder of valid claims can transfer their rights to others.
Surface ownership is also by the U.S. and managed by the Bureau of Land
Management.
Thor's property position consists of 199 unpatented mining claims (approx.
1,663Ha), leased from underlying owners.
As long as Thor meets its' contractual obligations and keeps the claims in
good standing with the US, then the security of tenure should be good.
Depending on the location of the drill holes, the license to operate in the
area is a function of permitting at differing levels of government (Local,
State and Federal). The holes were in San Miguel County. In addition to the
normal State and Federal permitting San Miguel imposes its own set of
regulations. To date, Thor has met those permitting requirements.
Exploration done by other parties
· Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.
There are no systems of consistent data archiving for mineral exploration or
exploitation done under the Mining Law on Federal or on other lands within the
State of Colorado. Furthermore, with some exceptions, there was not, nor is
not, a requirement that explorers provide copies of their data to governmental
agencies. That data was retained by private entities. It now exists in a
piecemeal manner, with the data having been discarded, abandoned or available
by vendors that managed to acquire and store some of it over the years.
Thor's properties have bountiful surface evidence of historic drill
exploration, and in some cases, mining exploitation, which appears to be
mostly from the 1950's through the early 1970's. There are several mines
located in the western portion of the property. Unpublished reports list
these mines as producing, in aggregate, over 700,000 lbs (318,181 kg) of
uranium. To the author's knowledge, very little of the historic drilling or
mining data is available to Thor, and certainly not enough to help guide an
exploration program. Antecdotal evidence suggests that some of the work on
the property was done by Union Carbide (now defunct), the largest company that
worked in the Uravan Mineral Belt.
Geology
· Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.
According to the USGS Bulletin 1693 (Cox, D.P., and Singer, D. A., eds.,
1986), the Deposit Model for the project is Sandstone Uranium - Tabular
subtype.
Drill hole Information
· A summary of all information material to the understanding of the
exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for
all Material drill holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the
drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.
· If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that
the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why
this is the case.
Tables, plans and sections summarising significant drill results are included
in the report
Data aggregation methods
· In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques,
maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and
cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.
· Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade
results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations
should be shown in detail.
· assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent
· The values should be clearly stated.
Gamma data was aggregated to determine equivalent uranium oxide grades (%
eU3O8), thicknesses and base of mineralization. Uranium grades and thicknesses
were based on a method originally devised by the AEC, which is a manual
graphic method based on the shape of the gamma curve on an e-log. It
consists of, for a single peak, determining the cps for the peak, and using
one-half that value to determine the upper mineralization boundary.
Successive cps picks on 0.5 ft (15.2cm) intervals are taken until the last
interval drops below the one-half peak value. This is the lower
mineralization boundary. These boundary values, plus the intervening 0.5 ft
(15.2cm) interval values, are used, in conjuction with parameters such as hole
diameter, whether or not the hole is dry or water-filled, if the hole is
probed in an open or cased or through drill steel, gamma detector dead time
and tool specific K factors, to arrive at a grade in %eU3O8, thickness and the
base of mineralization, of each peak. Slight modifications to the method are
made if more than one peak occurs close together.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths
· These relationships are particularly important in the reporting
of Exploration Results.
· If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill
hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.
· If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported,
there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true
width not known').
All results are assumed to be true width but is not definitively known at this
stage.
Diagrams
· Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of
intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported
These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
locations and appropriate sectional views.
Appropriate maps and sections are included in the report.
Balanced reporting
· Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not
practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or
widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration
Results.
All results have been reported
Other substantive exploration data
· Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be
reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical
survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical
and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
No meaningful or material information has been omitted from this release.
Further work
· The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral
extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step- out drilling).
· Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions,
including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas,
provided this information is not commercially sensitive.
The drill results suggest that several areas of potentially economic
mineralization could be investigated in greater detail. A couple of these
areas have had historic mining in the vicinity. Maps of where they mined are
scarce, so any delineation work needs to be cognisant of that mining
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
. END DRLUWSVRSWUURAARecent news on Thor Energy
See all newsREG - Thor Energy PLC - Quarterly Activities and Cash Flow Report
AnnouncementREG - Thor Energy PLC - HY-Range Exploration and Corporate Update
AnnouncementRCS - Thor Energy PLC - Investor Webinar
AnnouncementREG - Thor Energy PLC - HY-Range Project Maiden Prospective Resource
AnnouncementREG - Thor Energy PLC - Half-year report
Announcement