REG - Thor Mining PLC - Drilling Results, Kelly’s Prospect
15/12/2022 07:00
For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
http://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20221215:nRSO8172Ja&default-theme=true
RNS Number : 8172J Thor Mining PLC 15 December 2022
15 December 2022
This announcement contains inside information for the purposes of Article 7 of
the UK version of Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 which is part of UK law by
virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, as amended ("MAR"). Upon
the publication of this announcement via a Regulatory Information Service,
this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.
Thor Mining PLC
("Thor" or the "Company")
Kelly's Prospect
Drilling Results and a Correction to a Prior Result
Ragged Range, WA
The directors of Thor Mining Plc ("Thor") (AIM, ASX: THR, OTCQB: THORF) are
pleased to provide drilling results from the Kelly's Prospect, Ragged Range,
located in the Eastern Pilbara, Western Australia.
Project highlights:
§ Drilling has returned anomalous gold and copper values associated with
felsic and dacitic porphyry intrusions into the Euro Basalt at the Kelly's
Prospect, Ragged Range.
§ Best intercepts to date:
· 8m @ 1.31% Cu and 0.1g/t Au from 4m (22RRRC056), including
3m @ 2.9% Cu and 0.17g/t Au
· 1m @ 0.91 g/t Au from 40m (22RRRC049)
· 4m @ 0.1g/t Au, 0.3% Cu, 0.9% Pb, 0.2% Zn from 133m (22RRRC058)
§ QAQC Error: On 12 December 2022, the Bureau Veritas Kalgoorlie laboratory
reported to Thor that the 12.2g/t Au sample from drillhole 22RRC052 as
announced to the market (ASX/RNS: THR 4 November 2022) was an erroneous result
based on the laboratory making a sample swap with an internal standard. The
assay has subsequently reported <0.01g/t Au.
Photo 1: RC Chips from 22DDRC056 at Kelly's Ridge Prospect, Ragged Range
Nicole Galloway Warland, Managing Director of Thor Mining, commented:
"Disappointingly, due to a testing error at the Bureau Veritas laboratory, the
high-grade gold result announced in November was erroneous. Thor is
undertaking an investigation into the laboratory error to ensure that the
highest standard of procedure and reporting is provided going forward.
"These latest drill results are encouraging; however, further work is required
to fully explain why the high-grade gold and copper in surface rock chips is
not repeated in very shallow drill intersections."
The Ragged Range Project, located in the prospective Eastern Pilbara Craton,
Western Australia, is 100% owned by Thor Mining (covering E46/1190, E46/1262,
E46/1355, E46/1340 and E46/1393 - Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Figure 1: Location Plan.
Kelly's Prospect
This small reconnaissance program included six holes along Kelly's Ridge, two
below the historic Kelly's copper workings and two at the Kelly's NE Prospect
(Figure 2).
Drilling at Kelly's Ridge was designed to test below the high-grade rock
chips, returning up to 15g/t Au and 535g/t Ag along the 1km silicified ridge
at the contact between the Boobina Porphyry and Euro Basalt, as well as
testing below and along strike of the historic drillhole (DDHK2(1)) that
intersected 1.5m @ 22.97g/t gold, located at the porphyry-basalt contact
(Figure 3). The recent drillholes appear to have stopped too short to fully
test the targeted contact, with follow-up drilling proposed angled from the
west to east.
The 4m @ 12.2g/t Au intercept from 192 to 196m in drillhole 22RRRC052 has been
assayed in one-metre intervals and report 193 to 194m 0.15g/t Au with 1.6% Zn
and 0.13% Pb and 194 to 195m reports 0.02g/t Au with 0.35% Zn (Figure 3). This
type of zinc and lead metal association is to be expected in areas with
high-grade gold results and observations of quartz sulphide material in these
two metre intervals is very encouraging.
Beneath the historic Kelly's copper workings, copper was intercepted with
anomalous gold and silver warranting further review.
At the Kelly's NE Prospect, high-grade gold (up to 7.2g/t Au) and copper (up
to 13.6 % Cu) identified in rock chips (ASX/RNS: THR 7 December 2022) was
tested by two drillholes, 22RRRC057 and 22RRC058. Wide intersections of
low-grade copper were intersected in the first hole from shallow depth with
moderate grade intercepts in the second hole both at surface and at depth.
Surprisingly the tenor of gold with the copper is subdued, from assays
received to date, compared to the surface rock chips.
Significant results received to date include (greater than 0.1% Cu and 0.1 g/t
Au):
Kelly's Ridge
· 22RRRC049: 1m @ 0.91 g/t Au from 40m
· 22RRRC052: 1m @ 0.15g/t Au and 1.6% Zn
from 196m
Kelly's Mine
· 22RRRC056: 8m @ 1.31% Cu and 0.1g/t Au
from 4m (22RRRC056), including
3m @
2.9% Cu, 0.17g/t Au and 39g/t Ag from 7m
Kelly's NE
· 22RRRC057: 4m @ 0.13% Cu from 20m
· 22RRRC058: 19m @ 0.15% Cu from 8m,
including
3m @
0.24% Cu from 24m, and
3m @ 0.29% Cu, 0.12g/t Au, 8.5g/t Ag, 1.1% Pb, and 0.25% Zn from 133m
(Refer to Table A for Collar information and Table B for Significant Results)
QAQC Error
On 12 December 2022, Bureau Veritas Kalgoorlie laboratory reported to Thor
that the 4m composite sample 194m to 198m at 12.2g/t Au (final assay) from
drillhole 22RRC052 and announced to market (ASX/RNS: THR 4 November 2022) was
an erroneous result based on the laboratory making a sample swap with a
standard (Figure 3). The information for this error, which was supplied by
email from the Bureau Veritas Kalgoorlie Laboratory to Thor, is stated as:
"We found the cause of the elevated Au in this sample to be due to a sample
swap with an internal standard from a second batch that was assayed in the
same fire as the third batch of RRRC0052 containing RRRC003867. Unfortunately,
due to human error at the QAQC stage this swap was not picked up during the
initial assays resulting in the erroneous result being reported."
Based on the location down the hole of the intercept (contact between Euro
Basalt and Porphyry), the position of the intercept relative to the historic
drill intercept 1.52m @ 22.97g/t Au DDHK2 and the high-grade nature of the
historic intercept, plus visible sulphide-rich quartz chips; there was no
reason for Thor to question this assay result.
Thor considers this is not an acceptable practice by the laboratory, for the
original Au error but also the delay in reporting the error to Thor.
Bureau Veritas is re-assaying the full sample batch (relating to 22RRC049 to
22RRC052) to ensure accuracy and integrity of data. We anticipate these
results in January 2023.
Next Steps
The following activities and results at Ragged Range are anticipated over the
coming weeks:
1. Review Kelly's rock-chip and drilling data
2. Continue regional exploration, including
reconnaissance sampling over ground in the northern portion of tenure for
prospective lithium-caesium-tantalum enriched (LCT) pegmatites
Figure 2: Kelly's Prospect, highlighting drill collars and high-grade gold and
copper in rock chips.
Figure 3: Kelly's Ridge cross section A-A', showing drill collars, historic
drill intercept and high-grade rock chip-only a small portion of assay results
received to date.
Figure 4: Kelly's Ridge cross section showing 22RRRC0051 and 22RRRC052.
Table A: Kelly's Prospect Drill Collar Information (MGA94 Z50)
Hole ID Easting Northing RL EOH Dip Azi_TN Prospect /Comments
22RRRC049 797810 7586934 409 174 -55 230 Kelly's Ridge
22RRRC050 797813 7586935 409 204 -65 227 Kelly's Ridge
22RRRC051 797791 7586973 410 131 -55 230 Failed hole at 131m
22RRRC052 797793 7586974 410 205 -65 231 Kelly's Ridge
22RRRC053 797697 7587096 408 162 -54 231 Kelly's Ridge
22RRRC054 797662 7587132 407 174 -55 230 Kelly's Ridge
22RRRC055 798131 7587427 405 70 -55 253 Kelly's NE
22RRRC056 798100 7587520 402 72 -55 250 Kelly's NE
22RRRC057 797265 7587652 403 174 -55 215 Kelly's Copper Workings
22RRRC058 797180 7587725 403 204 -55 270 Kelly's Copper workings
Table B: Kelly's Prospect Significant Drill Intercepts
Hole ID Depth From Interval Au Cu Ag Pb Zn Comment
DESCRIPTION (m) (m) g/t % g/t ppm ppm
22RRRC049 40 1 0.91 NS 0.02 4 96
22RRRC050 NSI
22RRRC051 NSI - Hole failed
22RRRC052 196 1 0.15 0.008 11 1320 15900
197 1 0.008 4 231 3480
22RRRC053 NSI
22RRRC054 NSI
22RRRC055 NSI
22RRRC056 0 12 0.14 0.9 11 41 120
including 7 3 0.17 2.9 39 121 94
22RRRC057 20 4 0.01 0.13 0.4 7 40
22RRRC058 8 19 0.01 0.15 0.7 9 45
and 133 3 0.12 0.31 8.5 10626 2453
and 139 1 0.01 0.17 1.2 59 174
and 169 1 0.01 0.16 1.2 25 142
Notes:
NSI = no significant intercept,
Assays pending = assays still in process at the laboratory
Cu% = copper %
Au g/t = gold in grams per tonne
1ppm = 0.0001%
References:
1. DDHk2, drilled by Hawkstone 1969, Open File Annual
Report
This announcement is authorised for release to the market by the Board of
Directors.
For further information, please contact:
THOR MINING PLC
Nicole Galloway Warland, Managing Director
+61 8 7324 1935
nicole@thormining.com
Competent Persons Report
The information in this report that relates to exploration results is based on
information compiled by Nicole Galloway Warland, who holds a BSc Applied
geology (HONS) and who is a Member of The Australian Institute of
Geoscientists. Ms Galloway Warland is an employee of Thor Mining PLC. She has
sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and
type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which she is
undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of
the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources
and Ore Reserves'. Nicole Galloway Warland consents to the inclusion in the
report of the matters based on her information in the form and context in
which it appears.
Updates on the Company's activities are regularly posted on Thor's website
www.thormining.com (http://www.thormining.com/) , which includes a facility to
register to receive these updates by email, and on the Company's twitter page
@ThorMining.
About Thor Mining PLC
Thor Mining PLC (AIM, ASX: THR; OTCQB: THORF) is a diversified resource
company quoted on the AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange, ASX in
Australia and OTCQB Market in the United States.
The Company is advancing its diversified portfolio of precious, base, energy
and strategic metal projects across USA and Australia. Its focus is on
progressing its copper, gold, uranium and vanadium projects, while seeking
investment/JV opportunities to develop its tungsten assets.
Thor owns 100% of the Ragged Range Project, comprising 92 km(2) of exploration
licences with highly encouraging early stage gold and nickel results in the
Pilbara region of Western Australia.
At Alford East in South Australia, Thor is earning an 80% interest in copper
deposits considered amenable to extraction via In Situ Recovery techniques
(ISR). In January 2021, Thor announced an Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate
of 177,000 tonnes contained copper & 71,000 oz gold¹.
Thor also holds a 30% interest in Australian copper development company
EnviroCopper Limited, which in turn holds rights to earn up to a 75% interest
in the mineral rights and claims over the resource on the portion of the
historic Kapunda copper mine and the Alford West copper project, both situated
in South Australia, and both considered amenable to recovery by way of
ISR.²³
Thor holds 100% interest in two private companies with mineral claims in the
US states of Colorado and Utah with historical high-grade uranium and vanadium
drilling and production results.
Thor holds 100% of the advanced Molyhil tungsten project, including measured,
indicated and inferred resources⁴, in the Northern Territory of Australia,
which was awarded Major Project Status by the Northern Territory government in
July 2020. Thor executed a $8m Farm-in and Funding Agreement with
Investigator Resources Limited (ASX: IVR) to accelerate exploration at the
Molyhil Project on 24(th) November 2022.(6)
Adjacent to Molyhil, at Bonya, Thor holds a 40% interest in deposits of
tungsten, copper, and vanadium, including Inferred resource estimates for the
Bonya copper deposit, and the White Violet and Samarkand tungsten
deposits.⁵ Thor's interest in the Bonya tenement EL29701 is planned to be
divested as part of the Farm-in and Funding agreement with Investigator
Resources Limited.(6)
Notes
(1)
www.thormining.com/sites/thormining/media/pdf/asx-announcements/20210127-maiden-copper.gold-estimate-alford-east-sa.pdf
(http://www.thormining.com/sites/thormining/media/pdf/asx-announcements/20210127-maiden-copper.gold-estimate-alford-east-sa.pdf)
(2)
www.thormining.com/sites/thormining/media/pdf/asx-announcements/20172018/20180222-clarification-kapunda-copper-resource-estimate.pdf
(http://www.thormining.com/sites/thormining/media/pdf/asx-announcements/20172018/20180222-clarification-kapunda-copper-resource-estimate.pdf)
³
www.thormining.com/sites/thormining/media/aim-report/20190815-initial-copper-resource-estimate---moonta-project---rns---london-stock-exchange.pdf
(http://www.thormining.com/sites/thormining/media/aim-report/20190815-initial-copper-resource-estimate---moonta-project---rns---london-stock-exchange.pdf)
(4)
www.thormining.com/sites/thormining/media/pdf/asx-announcements/20210408-molyhil-mineral-resource-estimate-updated.pdf
(http://www.thormining.com/sites/thormining/media/pdf/asx-announcements/20210408-molyhil-mineral-resource-estimate-updated.pdf)
(5)
www.thormining.com/sites/thormining/media/pdf/asx-announcements/20200129-mineral-resource-estimates---bonya-tungsten--copper.pdf
(http://www.thormining.com/sites/thormining/media/pdf/asx-announcements/20200129-mineral-resource-estimates---bonya-tungsten--copper.pdf)
(6)
https://thormining.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20221124-8M-Farm-in-Funding-Agreement.pdf
(https://thormining.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20221124-8M-Farm-in-Funding-Agreement.pdf)
1 JORC Code, 2012 Edition - Table 1
1.1 Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling techniques · Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or Reverse circulation drill samples were collected utilising a PVC sampling
specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the spear on the drill cutting piles to collect a 4m composite sample weighing
minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF approximately 3kg. Equal portions were taken from each pile to ensure
instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad representative samples and every metre was sampled. In addition, 1m samples
meaning of sampling. were collected directly off the cyclone (1/8 split), which can be assayed as
required to replace the 4m composite sample results. In zones of visual
· Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity interest during drilling, these 1m splits were submitted for analysis instead
and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. of the 3m composites.
· Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to
the Public Report.
· In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be
relatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m
samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire
assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there
is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed
information.
Drilling techniques · Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary Reverse circulation drilling (5 ¼
air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or
standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, inch diameter)
whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
Drill sample recovery · Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and Sample recovery was good. Each drill cutting pile size is logged and any
results assessed. deviation from expected is raised with the driller, and if undersize, to check
for blockages. No sample biases are expected, and no relationship is known to
· Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative exist between sample recovery and grade.
nature of the samples.
· Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and
whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.
Logging · Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and All chip samples are qualitatively geologically logged (lithology, structure,
geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral alteration, veining, mineralisation, weathering, colour and other features).
Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. No mineral resource estimation, mining studies or metallurgical studies have
been conducted at this stage, but samples have been logged in sufficient
· Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or detail to use for this function.
costean, channel, etc) photography.
During the logging process representative samples are stored in chip trays for
· The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. future reference. The RC chip trays are photographed and electronically
stored.
Sub- sampling techniques and sample preparation · If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core Drill samples were taken dry with a PVC spear as described in "Sampling
taken. Techniques" above. The sample sizes are as per industry standard for RC
drilling.
· If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and
whether sampled wet or dry.
· For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the Sampling is carried out using standard protocols and QAQC procedures as per
sample preparation technique. industry practice.
· Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to Field QAQC procedures for drilling involved the use of a certified standard,
maximise representivity of samples. blank and field duplicate sample submitted every 20 samples (i.e., 17 samples
and 3 QAQC samples). These are routinely checked against originals.
· Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the
in situ material collected, including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
All samples were sent to Bureau Veritas Laboratories in, which is an ISO 9001
· Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the accredited laboratory. Sample preparation includes sorting and drying,
material being sampled. followed by LM5 pulverising (PR303).
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests · The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and The assay method is considered 'industry standard' and appropriate for
laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or exploration.
total.
· For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc,
the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and Drill samples were assayed at Bureau Veritas Laboratories in by lead
model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. collection fire assay with a 40g charge and AAS finish for gold with a
detection limit of 0.01ppm (FA001)
· Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of
accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.
Internal certified laboratory QAQC was undertaken including check samples,
duplicates, blanks and internal standards
Handheld pXRF readings
readings are taken on -2mm sieved samples on every drill metre, using an XTL5
Niton with a 40 second reading time.
Instrument is calibrated at start of each day, along with QAQC of 1 standard
and 1 blank. External instrument calibration completed annually.
All drill samples are measured for magnetic susceptibility at 1m intervals
using a hand-held magnetic susceptibility meter.
Verification of sampling and assaying · The verification of significant intersections by either independent All significant intersections have been verified by a company geologist and
or alternative company personnel. alternative company geologist.
· The use of twinned holes. There are no twinned drillholes.
· Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data All drilling data is collected in a series of templates in excel including
verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. geological logging, sample information, collar and survey information.
· Discuss any adjustment to assay data. All data is digitally recorded in the company's electronic database, managed
by external database company utilising Datashed5 software.
No adjustments have been made to the assay data.
Location of data points · Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar Drill collars were surveyed using a handheld Garmin 62s GPS with an accuracy
and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in of +/-3m. Grid system is MGA94 zone 50 (GDA). Drill rig alignment at the
Mineral Resource estimation. collar was conducted using a north seeking gyro. Topographic control using the
GPS is suitable for early- stage exploration.
· Specification of the grid system used.
· Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
Data spacing and distribution · Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Data spacing for preliminary exploration is deemed sufficient to test
geochemical anomalies and mapped structural features. Sufficiently anomalous
· Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish assays and any other zones of interest will be assayed in more detail using
the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral the 1m samples collected off the cyclone.
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.
· Whether sample compositing has been applied.
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure · Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of Orientational bias is not applicable to RC drilling at this stage but samples
possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the and drill lines were orientated approximately perpendicular to the assumed
deposit type. strike of gold mineralisation.
· If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the
orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a
sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.
Sample security · The measures taken to ensure sample security. All samples taken from Newman to Bureau Veritas, via registered express
freight company.
Sample Security levels are considered appropriate for RC Drilling.
Audits or reviews · The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. None undertaken. Thor's sampling procedure conforms to industry standard
practice and each assay program is reviewed internally for any discrepancies.
1.1 Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status · Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including Exploration results are reported on E46/1393 in Western Australia held 100% by
agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, Pilbara Goldfields Pty Ltd, Thor Mining PLC.
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites,
wilderness or national park and environmental settings.
· The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with
any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
Exploration done by other parties · Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. Sporadic surface geochemistry over tenure carried out by Great Southern Mines
up to 1997.
CRAE explored are in 1994.
1966 - 1974 - the area was explored by Conwest, Cominco and Hawkstone drilling
2 holes DDHK1 and DDHK2 with a copper focus.
Keely Copper Mine was worked between 1955 - 1970 intermittently.
Geology · Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. Yet to be determined
Drill hole Information · A summary of all information material to the understanding of the Tables, plans and sections summarising significant drill results are included
exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for in the report
all Material drill holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of
the drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.
· If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that
the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why
this is the case.
Data aggregation methods · In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, All aggregate drill intercepts are length weighted and there was no internal
maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and dilution incorporated. No metal equivalents have been reported.
cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.
· Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade
results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations
should be shown in detail.
· assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent
· The values should be clearly stated.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths · These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of All results are assumed to be true width but is not definitively known at this
Exploration Results. stage.
· If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole
angle is known, its nature should be reported.
· If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there
should be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true width
not known').
Diagrams · Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of Appropriate maps and sections are included in the report.
intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported
These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
locations and appropriate sectional views.
Balanced reporting · Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not All results have been reported
practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or
widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration
Results.
Other substantive exploration data · Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be No meaningful or material information has been omitted from this release.
reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical
survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical
and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
Further work · The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral It is anticipated that follow up and reconnaissance geochemistry (rockchip,
extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step- out drilling). soil & stream) and drilling will be undertaken over tenure , including
Sterling and Kelly's prospects.
· Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions,
including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas,
provided this information is not commercially sensitive.
( )
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
. END DRLTABFTMTABMMTRecent news on Thor Energy
See all newsREG - Thor Energy PLC - Quarterly Activities and Cash Flow Report
AnnouncementREG - Thor Energy PLC - Completion of Stage 1 Earn-In Commitment - Molyhil
AnnouncementREG - Thor Energy PLC - 3D Model Shows Alford East Copper Mineralisation
AnnouncementREG - Thor Energy PLC - Half-year Report
AnnouncementREG - Thor Energy PLC - High Grade Uranium and Vanadium Assays Results
Announcement