(Read this story in a pdf: http://reut.rs/1wZNTEQ)
By Norihiko Shirouzu
IKEDA, Japan, Jan 14 (Reuters) - When Daihatsu Motor Co
launched the Mira e:S minicar in 2011, the Toyota affiliate
thought it had found a model for emerging markets. The Mira e:S
- e for eco, S for smart - was capable of going 30 kilometers on
a liter of gasoline (72 mpg) for a sticker price of just 795,000
yen, or $6,637. And indeed, the car was a hit, super-charging
Daihatsu's earnings.
A number of improvements - in manufacturing, engineering,
procurement - went into the car. But the real secret to success,
says Kosuke Shiramizu, Daihatsu's chairman at the time, lay in
taking something out of the company's business model: the
vaunted Japanese "keiretsu" system.
Shiramizu, now a Daihatsu advisor, says Daihatsu shaved off
roughly $1,000 in the manufacturing costs of the car by
dismantling its keiretsu - an informal but close interlocking
business relationship between a manufacturer and its suppliers,
cemented by cross-shareholdings and personnel exchanges.
The automotive keiretsu system, pioneered by parent Toyota
Motor Corp. and widely adopted by rivals, was acclaimed across
the world in the 1980s and 1990s as an ingredient in Japan Inc's
success. Keiretsu, pundits preached, defused adversarial
relationships between assembler and supplier, allowing them to
share information and create better product quality. Hence
Japanese automakers were able to leap ahead with vehicles such
as the Toyota Corolla, the legendarily sturdy and reliable
family car.
Today, after two decades of stagnation in Japan, the
dramatic shift in growth to emerging markets and revolutions in
automotive technology, Shiramizu says the days of the keiretsu
are numbered. Companies, he says, are competing for price and
value by using market mechanisms instead of relationship-based
arrangements. While analysts have been predicting the system's
demise for years, Daihatsu, along with Nissan Motor Co 7201.T
have gone further than any Japanese automaker in scrapping it.
"The Toyota way is the high-cost way," says Shiramizu, 74,
in an interview at Daihatsu headquarters in the Osaka suburb of
Ikeda. "Keiretsu doesn't work anymore. If we stick with it,
Daihatsu won't survive. Toyota might face a similar fate, too."
TOYOTA WATCHING
As Shiramizu reforms the way Daihatsu develops and buys
components, Toyota 7203.T , which has maintained a 51-percent
majority stake in Daihatsu 7262.T since 1998, is watching
Shiramizu's experiment with interest, he says.
That's because Akio Toyoda, the 58-year-old founding family
scion who became Toyota president in 2009, has struggled to deal
with the global auto market's seismic shift toward emerging
markets.
In China, Toyota lags rivals such as General Motors Co
GM.N and Volkswagen AG VOWG_p.DE . Toyota lacks no-frills
cars such as the Wuling Hong Guang, a 43,800-yuan ($7,050)
workhorse van GM designed and sells jointly with its Chinese
partners. Toyota's cheapest model is the 69,800-yuan Yaris
subcompact car.
In India, Toyota's "strategic volume car", the Etios, has
failed to ignite demand, chiefly because of its relatively high
price tag of 570,000 rupees ($9,118), even as rivals such as
Suzuki Motor Corp. 7269.T sell cars for as little as 240,000
rupees.
"Daihatsu could potentially offer Toyota a number of
important lessons on how to effectively use suppliers to come up
with a viable low-cost small car for markets like India," says
Shiro Sakamaki, a Daiwa Securities analyst in Tokyo.
And not just lessons but actual cars. Struggling to crack
the no-frills end of India's car market, Toyota earlier this
year called on Daihatsu for help in designing affordable cars
that could be sold under the Toyota name and through Toyota's
sales channels in India - an arrangement similar to one the two
companies have in Indonesia.
Shiramizu, who became advisor to Daihatsu's board and
technical executive after stepping down as chairman three and a
half years ago, says his parts procurement reform isn't meant to
be a template for Toyota. But it is being taken seriously there,
he says.
"Mr. Toyoda is carefully aware of what we're doing,"
Shiramizu says, when asked whether Toyoda is considering a
similar reform. "He views our parts procurement reform as one
experimental way."
Toyota has been making early moves towards a post-keiretsu
system on its own. Toyoda, for example, has told affiliated
group suppliers, such as Toyoda Gosei 7282.T and Toyota
Boshoku 3116.T , not to always count on business from Toyota.
He has given them the green light to do business with Toyota's
Japanese and foreign competitors, according to two board members
who spoke on condition of anonymity. Toyota has also begun
encouraging the company's keiretsu suppliers working on similar
technologies to merge or combine resources in order for them to
better compete with major global suppliers such as Robert Bosch
GmbH ROBG.UL and Continental AG CONG.DE
Ryo Sakai, a Tokyo-based Toyota spokesman, declined to
comment. "As a matter of policy, we do not disclose details of
our individual dealings with suppliers or our purchasing
strategies in general."
<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Read this story in a PDF: http://reut.rs/1wZNTEQ
Industry's past, future collide in Detroit ID:nL1N0UO1Z8
TAKE-A-LOOK: Detroit auto show ID:nL1N0UR0LT
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>
COMPETITIVE SHIFTS
Two major shifts over the past two decades in the
competitive landscape have been working against Japanese car
makers and their keiretsu systems.
First, Western rivals dramatically closed the gap with the
Japanese. That was partly due to the fact cars have become
easier to design and manufacture, because they are less
mechanical and are controlled more electronically. Competition
thus shifted to who could offer more value to the customer: the
highest fuel economy, the sexiest look, and the most compelling
functions for the lowest price.
The other competitive shift came from the emerging world.
Keiretsu worked beautifully for Toyota because an
overwhelming majority of the finely engineered cars it made were
sold in the high-priced developed markets of the United States,
Europe and Japan.
That began changing in the early 2000s, with the rise of
emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, India, China,
Indonesia, South Africa and Turkey. These economies already
collectively buy half of the automobiles sold worldwide today.
They will account for an estimated two-thirds of overall global
demand by 2020, when sales are expected to reach 100 million
cars annually.
For Daihatsu, whose business is mostly in the lower end of
the market both in Japan, as well as markets in Southeast Asia,
the keiretsu system was especially onerous. As it began buying
more components from Toyota-group suppliers such as Denso
6902.T and Aisin Seiki 7259.T over the years, it was also
stuck with Toyota's lofty quality standards. Shiramizu says
Toyota's specs are often too high for vehicles that some
Daihatsu officials describe as "sandals," as opposed to the
dress shoes that Toyota makes.
"Do we need parts and cars that withstand the desert heat in
Arizona?" Shiramizu asks.
Consumers in Daihatsu's key markets outside Japan -
Indonesia and Malaysia - are also used to driving under brutal
road conditions, which often force them to replace parts
quickly. They don't expect parts to last for five to 10 years,
so they are more willing to sacrifice durability for price, he
says.
FOREIGN PRESSURE
Shiramizu is an unlikely scourge of the Toyota tradition. A
career Toyota man, he was known inside the company as "the
emperor" because of his command of the business - and his
imperious temper. He reached the high post of executive vice
president before being sent over to run Daihatsu as chairman in
2005. But there, he says, he came to see the keiretsu as a
high-cost, inefficient burden. Shiramizu said his mantra at
Daihatsu was: dissolve the keiretsu, or die.
Shiramizu's reform began in 2009 with a decision to
terminate a routine redesign of its Mira mini-car in order to
recast it as a strategic car: the Mira e:S. Shiramizu says the
trigger was "gaiatsu," or foreign pressure, which he says
threatened to kill the special category of vehicles in Japan -
called "kei," or light, cars - that Daihatsu specialized in.
Washington and Detroit have considered "kei" cars such as
the Mira to be a trade trade barrier limiting global automakers'
business in Japan. The Japanese government offers a low annual
vehicle tax rate for kei cars - micro-mini vehicles powered by
engines sized at 660 cubic centimeters or less - which Detroit
doesn't make. They account for 40 percent of the Japanese auto
market. But the United States, a key trading partner and ally,
was unhappy that kei cars were becoming increasingly
indistinguishable from other low-cost economy cars with bigger
engines in Japan. The redesign of the Daihatsu micro-mini, along
with its new model name "e:S," was aimed at making its "kei"
cars a unique category - high on fuel economy and light on the
wallet.
An effort to come up with a car priced at $8,000 or lower
was "way way long overdue" for Daihatsu, Shiramizu says. The
American trade pressure was simply the last straw, he says.
By resetting the Mira's design direction, Shiramizu
unleashed the program of keiretsu destruction that is still
playing out inside Daihatsu.
His first move was to send agents of change - manufacturing
engineers like Saburo Yagi, Fumiaki Fukunaga, and Yoshiki Inoue
- into the company's procurement office.
Until then, Daihatsu's purchasing office was staffed by
non-technical types with little knowledge on how components are
designed and produced and, says Shiramizu, "no ability to assess
true cost." Instead of attacking costs, those purchasing
managers put a priority on their relationships with suppliers -
getting wined and dined and showered with gifts in the process,
Shiramizu says.
"ACCOUNT SYSTEM"
Shiramizu then initiated another move: abolishing the
"account" system that governed procurement deals. The status
quo, he says, made it almost impossible for new,
non-Toyota-group suppliers to do business with Daihatsu, even
when they offered better quality and price.
Under the account system, only existing suppliers with
Daihatsu accounts could supply parts to Daihatsu. These
so-called account holders tended to be a more financially stable
group of suppliers. Any aspiring new supplier had to ask an
account holder to sell through its account. Shiramizu says the
system tended to inflate costs because account holders charged a
fee - often 10 percent - for letting newcomers use their
accounts.
Those back-to-back moves took down the two biggest obstacles
preventing Daihatsu from looking beyond the Toyota group for
parts.
Most important, it allowed Shiramizu to deploy his new
procurement leaders in the hunt for lower-cost parts across
Japan - and beyond to China, Indonesia and India.
Inoue, who was plucked out of the production engineering
division by Shiramizu, and his team focused on China. The team
quickly found Chinese suppliers of windshields, mirrors,
speakers, and aluminum wheels at savings up to 50 percent.
One of the team's most critical findings was not a new
supplier, however. It was the discovery that some account
holders were slapping a hefty margin on components they procured
cheaply in China.
Shiramizu was furious. By February 2010, Inoue's team had
found two new suppliers, one near Shanghai and the other in the
Hebei provincial town of Qinhuangdao, capable of supplying
aluminum wheels for as cheaply as 150 yuan to 200 yuan a piece -
roughly half the price Toyota Tsusho 8015.T charged for a
comparable wheel from a different supplier. Daihatsu last year
bought approximately 1.3 billion yen worth of aluminum wheels in
China without going through middlemen.
"We have too many middlemen skimming off," Shiramizu says.
"Getting rid of those middlemen is the shortest cut to cost
savings."
Akitomo Inagaki, a spokesman for Toyota Tsusho, told Reuters
his company strives to provide "customised services" that
emphasise "timely delivery, safe instalment and sound
maintenance of equipment we handle".
"We don't see ourselves as a stereotypical trading company,"
he said.
ON-TIME DELIVERY
This experience quickly led to an all-out drive to weed out
the middlemen from an array of contracts. A key target was
Toyota Tsusho, a main provider of manufacturing equipment
Daihatsu used to produce cars in Japan, Indonesia and Malaysia.
Daihatsu's procurement specialists went factory to factory
in Japan, and enlisted Komatsu Ltd 6301.T , Trinity Industrial
Corp 6382.T , Toshiba Machine Co 6104.T , Meidensha Corp
6508.T and Toyota affiliate JTEKT Corp 6473.T as direct
suppliers, cutting out Toyota Tsusho.
Buying directly from those suppliers has made the job of
procurement specialists more complex. They have to ensure that
the logistics for parts delivery are sound, making sure
equipment orders are delivered to plants on time. It's worth it,
Daihtsu officials say. For example, the company says it saved
about 10 percent on milling machines it bought from JTEKT Corp
6473.T , which cost up to 30 million yen a piece.
Inagaki, the Toyota Tsusho spokesman, said that if companies
such as Daihatsu has the resources to allow them to do all the
logistics for safe and prompt delivery then they might not need
a trading company like Toyota Tsusho . "But in many cases, few
companies possess such capabilities on their own," he said.
Daihatsu's new procurement system was crucial to the success
of the Mira e:S, Shiramizu says, describing the car's redesign
as the start of a much broader initiative to help Daihatsu
adjust to rapid changes in the global market and industry.
"We still need to shave off another 100,000 yen to 200,000
yen to bring down the car's retail price even lower, into the
500,000-yen to 600,000-yen range, if we are to survive," he
says.
The ultimate $5,000 car would ensure Daihatsu's - and
perhaps Toyota's - success in emerging markets, he says.
MAKE AT HOME
Shiramizu stepped down as chairman in June 2011 and the Mira
e:S launched in Japan later that year. Still, lessons from the
car's redesign set off a wave of other moves now being pursued
by the talent Shiramizu trained.
In one such initiative, Daihatsu opened an office in
Shanghai. Its 20-person staff now searches across China for
low-cost parts, an effort that netted 3 billion yen worth of
parts by 2013.
The push last year went into hyper-drive when the China team
discovered factory hubs in the eastern China province of
Zhejiang for dirt-cheap generic auto parts - or, as one Daihatsu
executive puts it, "fakes."
Daihatsu discovered those generic parts in a roundabout way:
on parts shelves of dealers and repair shops in Indonesia that
stock them for penny-pinching everyday drivers.
A quality engineer who took note of the rampant use of those
parts in Indonesia told Shiramizu of his discovery, and a major
push to search for usable parts ensued.
The results have been mixed: Designs by the generic parts
producers are often robust, but the production quality is
unreliable, according to Daihatsu officials. Daihatsu isn't
giving up on China, but the officials say it is turning out to
be a time-consuming effort.
So how will Daihatsu realize a $5,000 car?
One solution being pursued now is to produce on its own many
of the core, high-ticket parts Daihatsu currently buys from
Toyota suppliers. Those include air-conditioning and steering
systems, drive shafts and wire harnesses.
"Toyota suppliers aren't going to like it," one official
says, "but our basic philosophy is to go 'in house' - and that
means no more middlemen."
(Reporting By Norihiko Shirouzu. Additional reporting by Aditi
Shah in New Delhi and Maki Shiraki in Tokyo.)
((Norihiko.Shirouzu@thomsonreuters.com;))
Keywords: DAIHATSU TOYOTA/