Picture of TS Financial Holding Co logo

2887 TS Financial Holding Co News Story

0.000.00%
tw flag iconLast trade - 00:00
FinancialsConservativeLarge CapNeutral

Fitch Revises Outlook on Taishin Holdco and Taishin Securities to Stable; Affirms Taishin Group

(The following statement was released by the rating agency)


Fitch Ratings-Shanghai/Taipei-September 05: Fitch Ratings has revised the 
Outlook on Taiwan-based Taishin Financial Holding Co., Ltd.'s (TFHC) and Taishin 
Securities Co., Ltd.'s (TSS) ratings to Stable from Negative. The Outlook on 
Taishin International Bank Co., Ltd. (TIB) remains Stable. The ratings of all 
three entities are affirmed. A full list of rating action is provided at the end 
of this commentary.

KEY RATING DRIVERS 

IDRS, NATIONAL RATINGS AND VIABILITY RATING

The Outlook revision on TFHC reflects our expectation that its common-equity 
double-leverage ratio (DLR) of 147% at end-1Q19 - or an estimated 117% excluding 
its investment in Chang Hwa Bank - is unlikely to rise significantly in absence 
of future M&A activities. We do not expect TFHC to make additional capital 
injections into TIB, as TIB has already strengthened its capitalisation to meet 
Basel III requirements. This should enable TFHC to keep its common-equity DLR 
stable. TFHC's Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) is affirmed at one notch 
below that of TIB to reflect TFHC's high common-equity DLR. 

The affirmation on TIB reflects the bank's well-established consumer-banking 
franchise, strong presence in digital banking, stable profitability and 
improving capitalisation, which support its solid financial profile. The bank 
has a strong presence in credit cards, wealth management and consumer loans 
thanks to its targeted customer acquisition and penetration strategy. It is also 
a leading player in digital banking, driven by the bank's commitment to fintech 
investments. This helps TIB expand its client base for further business 
opportunities and sustain its strong consumer franchise.  

We expect TIB to continue pursuing higher loan growth relative to the sector 
average in the next year or two, as it focuses on further growth in SME and 
mortgage loans. However, the bank's loan mix remains largely unchanged, with 
corporate and retail loans (mainly mortgages and home equity) making up 44% and 
56%, respectively, of total loans at end-1Q19; we expect the credit quality of 
its corporate-loan portfolio to stay stable, notwithstanding challenges from 
US-China trade tensions, which will also impact Taiwan's growth prospects. TIB's 
mortgage loan-to-value ratio remained consistently below 40% over 2015-1H19. Its 
impaired-loan ratio (based on Stage 3 under IFRS 9) was 1% at end-1Q19, in line 
with the peer average.

TIB's profitability should remain stable in 2019-2020, with its operating 
profit/risk-weighted assets ratio reaching around 1.1%, despite a slowing 
economy and heightened external uncertainties. This is likely to be driven by a 
pick-up in fee income from its expanding retail client base, enhanced wealth 
management product offerings and strengthened market position in overseas 
syndication loans. We believe credit costs will be contained, backed by the 
bank's focus on creditworthy borrowers and strict loan-to-value ratios on 
mortgages. 

We expect stable Fitch Core Capital ratio in 2019-2020, compared with 11.2% at 
end-2018, or about 12% if adjusted for Taiwan's higher capital charges for 
mortgages relative to other developed markets. This should be supported by 
stable profitability and a lower dividend payout to TFHC. TIB's capitalisation 
continued to strengthen and its common equity Tier 1 ratio reached 9.6% as of 
end-2018 (8.7% at end-2017), meeting Basel III standards plus a 200bp Pillar 2 
buffer for overseas expansion, as required by the local regulator. TIB has a 
stable liquidity profile, as it is funded mostly by customer deposits, and we 
expect it to continue to benefit from Taiwan's ample liquidity. Its liquidity 
coverage ratio remained healthy at 131% at end-2018, higher than that of most 
domestic peers. 

The ratings and Outlook on TSS are aligned with that of its parent, TFHC. This 
reflects its small size, making it easier for TFHC to provide support, together 
with obligatory support from TFHC under the framework of Taiwan's Financial 
Holding Company Act and high integration between TSS and the group.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR 

TIB's Support Rating and Support Rating Floor reflect a moderate probability of 
state support, if needed, in light of its moderate systemic importance, with a 
deposit market share of about 3%.

SUBORDINATED DEBT 

TIB's subordinated bonds are anchored from its National Long-Term Rating and are 
rated one notch below to reflect their subordinated status, the absence of a 
going-concern loss-absorption feature and limited loss severity. The bonds' 
ratings have thus been affirmed due to the affirmation of TIB.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

IDRS, NATIONAL RATINGS AND VIABILITY RATING

TIB's IDRs, National Ratings and Viability Rating are sensitive to changes in 
Fitch's assessment of its ability to maintain the strength of its 
consumer-banking franchise, which would also directly affect our assessment of 
its financial profile. Downward rating pressure may arise if there is a 
noticeable deterioration in TIB's profitability, which in turn would impair its 
ability to maintain sufficient capital buffers relative to its risk appetite.  

Significant changes in TIB's ratings would affect the ratings of TFHC and TSS to 
a similar extent. Notching between TFHC and TIB could widen to two notches if 
the common-equity DLR at TFHC deteriorates extensively, this is likely to be 
driven by M&A, which are opportunistic in nature and are not factored into our 
base case. Conversely, TFHC's ratings may be equalised with those of TIB if TFHC 
significantly increases its core capitalisation or reduces its common-equity DLR 
to consistently below 120%. This could be triggered by a final court ruling on 
the decade-long legal dispute on TFHC's control of Chang Hwa Bank. 

A widening of the notching between TFHC and TSS could arise from a significant 
change in TSS's size relative to that of its parent that limits TFHC's capacity 
to provide support.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR 

TIB's Support Rating and Support Rating Floor are sensitive to changes in 
assumptions around the propensity or ability of the Taiwan government to provide 
timely support.

SUBORDINATED DEBT 

Any rating action on TIB could trigger similar action on its debt ratings, as 
the subordinated debt ratings are broadly sensitive to the same considerations 
that might affect TIB. 

The rating actions are as follows: 

TFHC 

Long-Term IDR affirmed at 'BBB'; Outlook revised to Stable from Negative 

Short-Term IDR affirmed at 'F3'

National Long-Term Rating affirmed at 'A+(twn)'; Outlook revised to Stable from 
Negative

National Short-Term Rating affirmed at 'F1(twn)'

Viability Rating affirmed at 'bbb'

TIB

Long-Term IDR affirmed at 'BBB+'; Outlook Stable

Short-Term IDR affirmed at 'F2'

National Long-Term Rating affirmed at 'AA-(twn)'; Outlook Stable

National Short-Term Rating affirmed at 'F1+(twn)'

Viability Rating affirmed at 'bbb+'

Support Rating affirmed at '3'

Support Rating Floor affirmed at 'BB+'

Subordinated (Basel II Tier 2 capital) debt rating affirmed at 'A+(twn)'

TSS

Long-Term IDR affirmed at 'BBB'; Outlook revised to Stable from Negative

Short-Term IDR affirmed at 'F3'

National Long-Term Rating affirmed at 'A+(twn)'; Outlook revised to Stable from 
Negative

National Short-Term Rating affirmed at 'F1(twn)'

Contact: 

Primary Analysts

Janet Lu (TIB and TFHC)

Associate Director

+886 2 8175 7613

Fitch Australia Pty Ltd, Taiwan Branch 

Suite 1306, 13F, 205, Tun Hwa North Road 

Taipei City, Taiwan

Rowena Chang (TSS)

Associate Director

+886 2 8175 7602

Secondary Analysts

Sophia Chen, CFA, CPA (TIB and TFHC)

Director

+886 2 8175 7604

Carol Liu (TSS)

Associate Director

+86 21 6898 8001

Committee Chairpersons 

Parson Singha, CFA (TIB, TFHC)

Senior Director

+662 108 0151

Mark Young (TSS)

Managing Director

+44 20 3530 1318

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of ESG credit 
relevance is a score of 3 - ESG issues are credit neutral or have only a minimal 
credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they 
are being managed by the entity. 

TIB has an ESG Relevance Score of 4 for Group Structure due to its parent TFHC's 
ongoing legal dispute with the Taiwan government over the control of Chang Hwa 
Bank that affects the group's strategic planning, which has a negative impact on 
the credit profile, and is relevant to the rating in conjunction with other 
factors. For more information on our ESG Relevance Scores, visit 
www.fitchratings.com/esg

Note to editors: Fitch's National ratings provide a relative measure of 
creditworthiness for rated entities in countries with relatively low 
international sovereign ratings and where there is demand for such ratings. The 
best risk within a country is rated 'AAA' and other credits are rated only 
relative to this risk. National ratings are designed for use mainly by local 
investors in local markets and are signified by the addition of an identifier 
for the country concerned, such as 'AAA(twn)' for National ratings in Taiwan. 
Specific letter grades are not therefore internationally comparable.

Media Relations: Yee Man Ko, Hong Kong, Tel: +852 2263 9953, Email: 
alanis.ko@thefitchgroup.com; Wai-Lun Wan, Hong Kong, Tel: +852 2263 9935, Email: 
wailun.wan@thefitchgroup.com.

Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com

Applicable Criteria 

Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 12 Oct 2018)

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10044408

National Scale Ratings Criteria (pub. 18 Jul 2018)

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10038626

Non-Bank Financial Institutions Rating Criteria (pub. 12 Oct 2018)

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10044407

Short-Term Ratings Criteria (pub. 02 May 2019)

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10073011

Additional Disclosures 

Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form 

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/dodd-frank-disclosure/10088386

Solicitation Status 

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/pr/10088386#solicitation

Endorsement Policy 

https://www.fitchratings.com/regulatory

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. 
PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK:  
HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING 
DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S 
PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND 
METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF 
CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, 
AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF 
CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE 
AVAILABLE AT HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/SITE/REGULATORY. FITCH MAY HAVE 
PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD 
PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED 
IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS 
ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Copyright © 2019 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its 
subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, 
(212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or 
in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and 
maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast 
information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and 
underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch 
conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it 
in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification 
of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are 
available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's 
factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains 
will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the 
requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is 
offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of 
relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its 
advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as 
audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, 
engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, 
the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources 
with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the 
issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports 
should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any 
third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on 
in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. 
Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the 
information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and 
other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the 
work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial 
statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings 
and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking 
and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature 
cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current 
facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that 
were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. 

The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or 
warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or 
any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the 
report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. 
This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and 
methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, 
ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, 
or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or   a report. The 
rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, 
unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or 
sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals 
identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible 
for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes 
only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute 
for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer 
and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be 
changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. 
Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a 
recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the 
adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular 
investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to 
any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other 
obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from 
US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In 
certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular 
issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a 
single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 
(or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or 
dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to 
use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed 
under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act 
of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular 
jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and 
distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to 
three days earlier than to print subscribers. 

For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd 
holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which 
authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit 
ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who 
are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange 
Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the 
"NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on 
Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on 
behalf of the NRSRO (see https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory), other 
credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and 
therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf 
of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit 
ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO

Recent news on TS Financial Holding Co

See all news