Good morning! After a busy week for company updates, let's see what the newswire has lined up for us today.
The agenda is now complete, with something of a big-cap bias today. Please share any requests for backlog items in the comments below.
11.30am: that's a clean sweep, so I'm wrapping up today's report. Thank you for reading and I hope you enjoy the long weekend. We'll be back with you on Tuesday.
Companies Reporting
Name (Mkt Cap) | RNS | Summary | Our View (Author) |
Shell (LON:SHEL) (£146bn) | Ahead of exps. Q1 adj earnings of $5.8bn (+52% vs Q4 24). Divi unch, further $3.5bn buyback. | AMBER (Roland) Q1 results have received a boost from the group’s core oil and gas production business. Shell has a clear strategy and seems to be executing well. A stronger balance than BP has allowed it to maintain aggressive share buybacks. However, earnings forecasts have been trending lower and macro uncertainty remains. Without taking a stronger and more subjective view on commodity prices, I think I have to remain neutral at current levels. | |
Natwest (LON:NWG) (£42bn) | Q1 adj profit +36% to £1,252m. Q1 return on tangible equity of 18.5%. Net impairment charge of £189m.2025 income and returns are now expected to be “at upper end” of guidance. | AMBER/GREEN (Roland) [no section below] Today’s Q1 results are ahead of consensus expectations, according to Reuters. CEO Paul Thwaite now expects full-year results to be at the upper end of expectations. Based on guidance for FY25 RoTE of 15%-16%, this implies the remainder of the year might not be quite as profitable as Q1. One reason for this might be the bank’s view on the UK economy, highlighted by today’s higher impairment charge. On a more positive note, the UK government’s holding fell below 2% yesterday, so NatWest is now fully under private ownership again, for the first time since 2008. The shares aren’t as cheap as they were, but the fundamentals look strong to me and the c.6% yield seems safe enough. I’m happy to maintain our moderately positive view on this bank. | |
Standard Chartered (LON:STAN) (£26bn) | Q1 adj profit +11% to $1,357m ahead of exps. Tariff uncertainty. 2025/2026 guidance unchanged. | AMBER (Roland) [no section below] Today’s update seems broadly positive, but highlights the “increased global economic and geopolitical complexity” resulting from tariffs. I don’t see any specific concerns, but StanChart is less profitable than rival HSBC and has much smaller scale. The shares are up >40% in 12 months and now yield under 3%. I’m inclined to take a neutral view at this level. | |
Pearson (LON:PSON) (£7.8bn) | Adj rev +1%, all units trading in line. Exp H2 weighting to growth. 2025 guidance unchanged. | AMBER (Roland) [no section below] Pearson reports sales up 1% in its core Assessment & Qualifications business (61% of FY24 profit). Performance elsewhere is mixed and this strikes me as a slightly weak update. Full year sales and adjusted profit guidance are unchanged today, but their delivery appears to be dependent on a stronger H2 performance. I note that consensus has trended lower over the last year. The profitability of this group is average (10% ROCE) but its shares trade on a P/E of 17. I can’t get higher than neutral and would personally be inclined to caution. | |
Rotork (LON:ROR) (£2.6bn) | Revenue “modestly lower” in Q1, order intake up by “mid-single digit” YoY. April trading in line. Tariff surcharge applied where needed. Mgt exp “year of progress”. | AMBER/GREEN (Roland) [no section below] The industrial flow control specialist says it has three US plants which represent c.20% of total sales and can supply “the majority” of local demand, presumably minimising the impact of tariffs. | |
Gamma Communications (LON:GAMA) (£1.2bn) | Gamma has moved its listing from AIM to the Main Market. This process has now completed. | GREEN (Roland) [no section below] Entry into the FTSE 250 later this year looks likely for Gamma, as far as I can see. This could bring the stock into more mainstream active and passive funds - although checking the shareholder register, a number of major institutions are already present. Personally, I see this move to the Main Market as a mild positive, but not in itself a reason to buy or sell the stock. I’m happy to leave Megan's positive view in March unchanged. | |
Apax Global Alpha (LON:APAX) (£573m) | Q1 NAV -5.7% to €1.16bn. Total NAV return +0.5% at constant FX. Expect only minor tariff exposure. Average TTM EBITDA growth of 16% in the underlying private equity portfolio. Valuations “generally flat overall”. | AMBER (Roland) [no section below] This investment trust provides exposure to Apax private equity funds (focused on tech, services and internet/consumer) and a portfolio of debt investments. NAV fell in Q1, although this appears to have been largely driven by USD dollar weakness. This offset earnings growth in underlying PE funds and impacted the reported value of the trust’s USD debt investments. At 119p, the shares trade at a 40% discount to today’s reported Q1 NAVps of 200p and offer a 9.3% dividend yield. I haven’t looked at this trust in detail and am not familiar with the underlying Apax PE investments. I think the main risk in PE currently is that valuations could gradually drift lower as owners are forced into realisations. However, my initial impression is that Apax Global Alpha could offer value and may be worth further research. |
Shell (LON:SHEL)
+3.5% to 2,520p (£151bn) - Q1 Results - Roland - AMBER
Today’s results from oil and gas giant Shell appear to be 12% ahead of consensus estimates, according to figures commissioned by Shell:
Q1 2025 forecast adjusted earnings: $4,963m
Q1 2025 actual adjusted earnings: $5,577m
The group’s Q1 earnings were 27% below the Q1 2024 but were 52% higher than in Q4 2024. Market convention is to use year-on-year comparators, and in most cases I think this is more useful. But for a largely unseasonal commodity producer with heavy exposure to commodity pricing, I tend to think that sequential comparisons are more meaningful.
Checking through the detail of the consensus estimates, more than half the outperformance was driven by the group’s core upstream (oil and gas production) business. Refining, Integrated Gas (LNG) and marketing delivered smaller beats to analysts estimates.
In reality, I suspect the improved quarter-on-quarter performance is due to Shell’s heavy gas exposure. Courtesy of Trading Economics, we can see in this chart that natural gas prices strengthened in Q1 versus Q4, helping to offset weaker oil prices:
Shareholder returns: Shell has announced another $3.5bn quarterly share buyback today for Q2, while the group’s quarterly dividend has been left unchanged.
CEO Wael Sawan said earlier this year that the company’s dividend is sustainable down to an oil price of $40 per barrel, while buybacks can be sustained down to $50 per barrel, so these shareholder return plans are consistent with this.
Balance sheet: Q1 adjusted earnings of $5.6bn were converted into $5.3bn of free cash flow, according to the company. This was consumed by cash outflows on buybacks ($3.3bn) and dividends ($2.2bn) during the period.
As a result, Shell’s net debt rose by $2.7bn to $41.5bn as the company funded working capital movements and payments relating to the acquisition of Singapore LNG trader Pavilion Energy.
Gearing rose to 18.7% during the quarter, but this remains well below the figure of 25.7% reported by BP earlier this week. I don’t see Shell’s gearing as a concern; as well as being lower than at BP, in my view Shell also has a stronger record of financial discipline.
Outlook: Shell is maintaining its spending plans and reiterated guidance today for capital expenditure of $20bn to $22bn in 2025 (2024: $21bn).
As far as I can see, full-year earnings expectations are not changed significantly by today’s results. However, it may be worth noting that earnings have trended lower over the last year. Macroeconomic uncertainty and recent falls in energy prices could maintain pressure on forecasts, potentially.
Forecasts suggest modest valuation multiples, albeit in a sector where this is the norm (in the UK, at least - CEO Sawan hopes to close the valuation gap with US majors):
Roland’s view
Today’s results from Shell compare favourably to those of UK-listed rival BP, whose first-quarter results came in below expectations on Tuesday (see our coverage here).
In my view, Shell has generally been better run and benefited from a more consistent and coherent strategy than BP over the last 20 years. This has been reflected in the two companies' share price performances:
Stockopedia’s algorithms style Shell as a Contrarian stock, due largely to its weakening momentum:
I might normally be tempted to take a moderately positive view here, given Shell’s strong execution, reasonable valuation and rapidly-diminishing share count. However, given the erosion to earnings forecasts and external macro risks, I think a neutral view is more sensible at the moment.
See what our investor community has to say
Enjoying the free article? Unlock access to all subscriber comments and dive deeper into discussions from our experienced community of private investors. Don't miss out on valuable insights. Start your free trial today!
Start your free trialWe require a payment card to verify your account, but you can cancel anytime with a single click and won’t be charged.