121

Daily Stock Market Report (Wed 6th May 2026) - RFX, TBCG, SEE, DGE, NXT, JDW, RCH

Good morning!

In overnight news, President Trump has paused US plans (announced on Sunday) to provide a safe escort for ships through the Strait of Hormuz. The decision has come after reported clashes between US and Iranian forces.

Stocks surged to all-time highs following the news, with the S&P 500 closing up by 0.8% at 7,259 and South Korea’s Kospi index gaining 6% to a new record as investors redoubled bets on AI. Correction: the tech-heavy Nasdaq index also closed at new highs last night:

b8fbd775-380d-4d0e-b0a5-63d59b2bc5c9.png

Oil prices fell, with Brent Crude down by around 1.5% to $108. However, UK Natural Gas rose by 2.6% as fears of shortages continued. Elsewhere, Norway has announced that it will reopen three gas fields that were closed in the late 1980s.

Markets are expected to open higher this morning, while oil has continued to fall:

  • FTSE 100 to open up by 1% at c.10,325

  • German Dax to open up 0.7% at c.24,555

  • S&P 500 to open up by 0.3% at c.7,280

  • Brent Crude down 1% at $107.5

I'm happy to report that I'm joined by Dr James Fox once again for today's report.

Today's report is now complete - see you in the morning!

Spreadsheet accompanying this report: link.


Companies Reporting

Name (Mkt Cap)RNSSummaryOur view (Author)

Diageo (LON:DGE) (£32.9bn SR62)

Q3 Trading Statement

Q3 sales up 2.3% (0.3% organic), with YTD sales down by 2.2%. Weakness in North America, where net sales fell by a “high-single-digit” amount. FY26 guidance unchanged.AMBER ↑ (Roland)
Today’s quarterly update shows sales ahead of expectations, with a return to modest growth. Full-year guidance remains unchanged though, suggesting Q4 is not expected to erase the group’s difficult H1. The main drag on results remains North America, where Diageo’s sales slowdown deepened in Q3. I am confident of a turnaround but would like to see some progress with debt reduction before turning positive. To reflect this, I’m moving our view up to neutral today.

Next (LON:NXT) (£15.2bn SR61)

Trading Statement

Full price sales up 6.2% in Q1, versus a forecast of 4.0%. Sales forecast for the remainder of the year is unchanged. FY27 pre-tax profit guidance is increased by £8m to £1,218m (EPS guidance +5.6p to 792.9p).
Guidance is based on the assumption the impact of events in the Middle East neither worsens nor improves.
GREEN = (Roland) [no section below]
This is another exemplary update from Next, which beat sales forecasts in Q1 and has upgraded profit expectations accordingly. With the group’s usual prudence and clarity, assumptions for the impact of the Middle East conflict are made explicit and have been extended to include a continuation of the current situation. Sales guidance for the remainder of the year is unchanged, but I don’t think it’s unreasonable to speculate that further upgrades may be possible.
Graham was GREEN on Next in March. There’s been no significant change in valuation since then, so I’m happy to remain fully positive today.

Smith & Nephew (LON:SN.) (£9.9bn | SR54)

First Quarter 2026 Trading Update

Q1 underlying revenue up 3.1%, with group growth in line with management’s expectations. New $500m share buyback announced.
FY26 guidance unchanged, with trading profit expected to rise by c.8%.

Kingfisher (LON:KGF) (£4.8bn | SR99)

Directorate Change

CEO Thierry Garnier has resigned to take up a senior leadership role at a company outside of Kingfisher’s markets. He has a 12-month notice period and will remain in role while the search for a successor is undertaken.

Renishaw (LON:RSW) (£3.5bn | SR74)

Trading Statement

Revenue for the nine months to 31 March rose by 9.5%. Q3 was “a record quarter” with revenue up 14%. Substantial expansion of order books for semiconductor & electronics manufacturing and aerospace & defence. Full-year expectations in line with recent guidance for adj pre-tax profit of £145m to £165m.

TBC Bank (LON:TBCG) (£2.6bn | SR82)

Q1 2026 Results

Net profit up 14.5% to GEL365m, with net asset value up 2.6% to GEL6.5bn. Q1 return on equity of 23.4%, +0.2% YoY. Remain confident of strong economic growth in Georgia and Uzbekistan in 2026.GREEN = (James - I hold) Despite conflict impacting the broader region, it was more of the same from TBC Group. The Georgian business delivered first-quarter numbers that are hard to fault – 15% profit growth, a 23.4% return on equity, and loan book expansion of 12%. The Uzbek business continues to drag with loan book recalibration following regulatory changes negatively impacting profitability. Investors will also be concerned by rising NPLs across the business. Despite this, the headline numbers remain strong and the valuation metrics are incredibly compelling.

Trainline (LON:TRN) (£892m | SR72)

Results for the twelve months ended 28 Feb 2026

Net ticket sales up 7% to £6.3bn, with revenue up 2% to £453m. Adj EPS up 23% to 23.6p per share. FY27 outlook: greater competition and fare freeze to weigh on growth. Net ticket sales of £6.2bn to £6.45bn, w/ revenue of £440m to £455m.

Biopharma Credit (LON:BPCP) (£785m | SR97)

Statement Re Alphatec Prepayment

Confirms that it has received a payment of $37.1m from Alphatec, consisting of $35m in principal and $2.1m of prepayment fees and accrued interest. The company earned a 11.93% net IRR on its ATEC investment.

Target Healthcare Reit (LON:THRL) (£648m | SR95)

Net Asset Value, Corporate Update, And Dividends.

EPRA NTAV per share up by 1% to 120.6p, mainly due to a LFL valuation uplift of 0.8% driven by rent reviews. Total accounting return of 2.3% for the quarter, with adj EPRA EPS of 1.6p and fully covered quarterly dividend of 1.508p per share.

J D Wetherspoon (LON:JDW) (£637m | SR28)

Trading Update Announcement

LFL sales up 3.4% in the 13 weeks to 26 April, with YTD LFL sales up 4.3%. Outlook: higher costs may result in “profits slightly below market expectations”.BLACK (AMBER/RED =) (Roland) [no section below]
Wetherspoon’s share price has risen slightly this morning despite today’s profit warning. This might reflect the broader market jump at the prospect of an end to the Middle East conflict or it may signify that investors have already priced in the downside here following earlier downgrades. Year-to-date sales growth of around 4% suggests to me that volumes may have been broadly flat, although this information isn’t disclosed.
However, I’m struck by today’s report that the company has spent £26m on share buybacks so far this year at an average price 15% above the current share price. I would argue this cash might have been better used to help reduce net debt, which is expected to end the year between £740 and £760m, incurring £47m of interest costs. If today’s update was in line I would have upgraded to AMBER, but given the further downgrade to profit guidance I am going to leave our moderately negative view unchanged, reflecting the StockRanks' Value Trap styling.
Intuitive Investments (LON:IIG) (£531m | SR55)Extension of PUSU DeadlinePreparations for a possible offer are continuing. The deadline for Acceler8 Ventures to make a firm offer has been extended to 5pm on 3 June 2026.TAKEOVER

Guardian Metal Resources (LON:GMET) (£418m | SR26)

Pilot Mountain Pre-Feasibility Progress Update

Strong progress across all PFS workstreams, with all required drilling now completed. The PFS is being supported by a US Department of War Defense Production Act Title III investment of $6.2m in a GMET subsidiary.

Foresight Solar Fund (LON:FSFL) (£351m | SR48)

Q1 2026 Trading Update and Net Asset Value

NAV per share unchanged at 99.2p on 31 March. Lower irradiation in Jan/Feb led to below-budget generation, but performance improved in March. Power prices increased during the period. Recent government policy changes are not expected to affect Foresight’s dividend for 2026.

Vanquis Banking (LON:VANQ) (£304m | SR71)

1st Quarter Results

Net receivables up 29% to £2,802m, with net interest margin down 2.2% to 15.6%. CET1 was down by 0.6% to 15.9%, reflecting deployment of capital to support lending growth. £3m provision for FCA Motor Finance redress is unchanged.
Outlook: all financial guidance remains unchanged for 2026 and 2027

Animalcare (LON:ANCR) (£230m | SR51)

Final Results

Revenue up 20%, with adj pre-tax profit up 62.7% to £10.9m. No dividend proposed following the announcement of a recommended acquisition on 16 April 2026.TAKEOVER

Capricorn Energy (LON:CNE) (£224m | SR98)

Extension of PUSU Deadline

Potential bidder Alamadiyaf al-Masiyyah continues to report progress regarding its funding arrangements. Deadline for a firm offer has been extended to 5pm on 3 June 2026.TAKEOVER

Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) (£204m | SR18)

Q3 FY2026 Quarterly KPIs

Reported production of 1.28m units in Q3 FY26, representing 122% quarter on quarter growth with over six million vehicles on the road now using Seeing Machines technology. Business guided to positive EBITDA for Q3 and H2, with production volumes rising again in Q4.AMBER ↑ (James) Today’s update offers the inflection points that bulls had been hoping for. The increase in production volume is very impressive, and with the European General Safety Regulation mandating DMS fitment across new vehicles from July, the catalyst is really coming into view. That doesn’t counteract all of our concerns - debt refinancing remains an issue - but there’s definitely cause to look at this stock with greater optimism. At 36.2x forward earnings, it’s not cheap, but multiples can compress quickly beyond an inflection point.

Reach (LON:RCH) (£180m | SR68)

Trading Update

Q1 revenues fell 6.9% year on year as digital revenues dropped 8.1% due to lower search and referral traffic. Print revenues also declined 6.6%. Reach said it was on track to meet full-year market expectations despite this difficult first quarter. AMBER = (Roland)
While the decline in print revenue appears to be largely as expected, changes to Google algorithms have created new challenges for online publishers in recent months. As a result, the slump in digital revenue seen during the final quarter of last year continued into Q1. I am inclined to be cautious about the opportunity here, but with the stock trading on a P/E of <3 and offering a potential 12% dividend yield with cash flow support from 2027, I am not sure I can justify a negative view. To reflect this situation and today’s in line guidance, I am leaving our neutral view unchanged.

Smiths News (LON:SNWS) (£161m | SR98)

Interim Results

Revenues of £515.7m and adjusted operating profit of £18.3m for the first half of FY26 – both below FY25. Results on track to meet market expectations of £37.2m adjusted operating profit. Growth supported by strength in newer verticals, including recycling. Secured 96% of publisher contracts through to 2029 following renewal with the Guardian group.

Hostelworld (LON:HSW) (£128m | SR21)

AGM Statement

Reiterated full-year guidance ahead of AGM at noon, 6 May, with new chair Marieke Bax noting that intra-European travel demand was holding up and offsetting softness in long-haul bookings from Asia, which are impacted by the Middle East conflict.

Ramsdens Holdings (LON:RFX) (£124m | SR96)

Trading Update

Upgraded profit before tax guidance for FY26 to a range of £28.5m to £31.5m, well ahead of the prior consensus of £24.1m, driven by a gold price running around 40% ahead of last year and a 50% increase in the weight of gold purchased. Record pawnbroking lending also contributed to the changed guidance.
Cavendish upgraded forecasts:
- FY26E adj EPS: 63.2p (53.2p prev.)
- FY27E adj EPS: 44.7p (37.6p prev.)
GREEN = (Roland)
The price of gold has remained strong, despite falling from the record high levels seen earlier in the year. Ramsdens’ gold purchase business is booming and pawnbroking demand has also risen.
On the downside, the company flags up the risk that currency demand could fall if summer holiday travel is disrupted and warns of growing volatility in gold. Broker forecasts also suggest profits will peak this year.
I’m conscious of these risks, but at this stage I think it’s fair to remain positive given the chain of earnings upgrades, Ramsdens’ underlying business growth and the reasonable valuation.

Jubilee Metals (LON:JLP) (£89m | SR36)

Operational and Production Update 9m FY2026

Jubilee Metals reported a 28.7% increase in saleable copper production to 2,177 tonnes for the nine months to March 2026. Full-year copper production is under review pending confirmation of progress at the Molefe Mine expansion.

Brave Bison (LON:BBSN) (£83m | SR42)

Major Contract Win

MiniBMA, the marketing training business acquired by Brave Bison in August 2025, has signed a deal to put more than 1,000 Omnicom Oceania employees through its programme.

Zanaga Iron Ore (LON:ZIOC) (£42m | SR25)

Completion of DRI Process Plant Costing

Zanaga Iron Ore Company announces completion of development programme for its Republic of Congo iron ore project, confirming improved economics including a Stage One NPV of $2.54bn.

Energypathways (LON:EPP) (£18m | SR11)

NSTA decision to offer Gas Storage Licence

EnergyPathways Irish Sea to be awarded a Gas Storage Licence by the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) as part of its MESH project – expected to be Britain’s largest integrated energy storage facility.

Chesterfield Special Cylinders Holdings (LON:CSC) (£18m | SR73)

Property Lease Renewal

Chesterfield Special Cylinders announces lease of three acres of land adjacent to existing freeholding site in Sheffield – the lease is extended from less than 20 years to 125 years.

Portmeirion (LON:PMP) (£13m | SR62)

Preliminary Results & Directorate Change

In 2025, Portmeirion Group generated £91.1m in revenue – down £0.1m on 2024. The company reported a basic earnings per share loss of 25.3p, following a 8.04p profit the prior year. The group also announced the appointment of Michael Scheepers as CEO.

Roland's Section

Ramsdens Holdings (LON:RFX)

Up 8.5% at 418p (£135m) - Trading Update - Roland - GREEN =

The UK’s remaining listed pawnbroker has proved to be an excellent way to play the gold price over the last couple of years:

6d13b621-f2c2-4404-a4c9-38251a68e4b2.png

Today we have another upgrade from this well-regarded small cap. This continues a long-running trend that’s seen FY26 earnings estimates double over the last 18 months:

fddec52e-6ac0-4981-acf1-c88b0d7cc640.png

Here are the main points from this morning’s update, which covers the period since 1 October 2025.

Unsurprisingly, the gold price is the main factor behind today’s upgrade:

b7b2916d-8c45-4b76-8617-4b78b4dc61b2.png

While gold is below the highs seen earlier this year, Ramsdens says the price of the yellow metal remains 40% above the same period last year.

The combination of continued high prices, Ramsdens’ marketing efforts and UK macroeconomic conditions has driven strong growth in gold purchase volumes and pawnbroking:

  • The weight of gold purchased during the year to date is 50% above the same period last year.

  • Jewellery retail revenue is 25% ahead, year-on-year, with “slightly improved” gross margins.

  • Strong demand has seen the pawnbroking loan book rise by 24% to £14.1m since the end of September 2025.

Currency slowdown? The main risk flagged up today is that demand for foreign exchange could slump if jet fuel shortages reduce international travel over the peak summer period.

Ramsdens says total currency exchanged so far this year is “marginally back on last year”, but the commission earned has fallen by 9% as customers increasingly migrate online and towards lower margin currency cards.

New stores: Five new stores have opened recently and are said to be trading well. The company expects two further stores to open in May and expects to open between 10 and 12 stores in total during FY26.

Outlook

Ramsdens warns that the gold price has become volatile and the geopolitical environment remains uncertain. However, as things stand the Board believes pre-tax profit is now likely to be significantly ahead of previous guidance:

  • FY26 pre-tax profit to be “at least £28.5m” (previously “at least £24m”).

  • If the favourable gold price continues and summer currency volumes are in line with last year, FY26 pre-tax profit could be up to £31.5m (previously £28m).

With thanks to house broker Cavendish on Research Tree, we have updated earnings forecasts today. Interestingly, Cavendish has now chosen to upgrade its FY27 forecasts, in addition to FY26:

  • FY26E adj EPS: 63.2p (+18.8% versus 53.2p previously)

  • FY27E adj EPS: 44.7p (+18.8% versus 37.6p previously)

I think it’s worth emphasising that these forecasts show a drop in profits next year. This reflects an expected decline in profits from precious metal purchases, with continued growth in the remainder of the business.

Roland’s view

I see Ramsdens as a well-run business with attractive economics; returns on capital are notably high:

5ef52dd0-7399-47ad-9415-4a1482968c1e.png

The valuation also remains reasonable, in my view, with the possible caveat that if FY26 does mark a peak in earnings from gold, the shares could look more expensive as we roll into FY27:

edd533b0-6aac-499c-a26b-e3d723538d75.png

The potential for earnings to fall next year may explain why Ramsdens’ share price has only risen by <10% this morning, despite a 19% increase to FY26 and FY27 earnings estimates.

In effect, the stock is now slightly cheaper than it was yesterday!

Of course, predictions for the gold price in 2027 are subject to a very high level of uncertainty. I would expect further changes – up or down – to Ramsdens’ FY27 earnings estimates in the coming months.

Graham took a positive view on Ramsdens’ following March’s upgrade. Given the size of today’s upgrades and the stock’s current valuation, I don’t see any reason to change our view today. It looks like earnings expectations are still catching up with the strong gold price.

I’d also note that the algorithms continue to have a favourable view of this business, with Super Stock styling and a high StockRank:

7d969fd4-08fc-41b9-8644-5f770c5a76bc.png


Diageo (LON:DGE)

Up 4.9% at 1,548p (£34.6bn) - Q3 FY26 Trading Statement - Roland - AMBER ↑

I have been looking for an opportunity to turn more positive on this FTSE 100 drinks group. Is today’s quarterly update – which highlights an unexpected return to quarterly sales growth – the excuse I need?

Q3 & YTD trading highlights

The main takeaway from this morning’s update is that third-quarter sales rose by 2.3%, or by 0.3% on an organic basis. Volumes also rose by 0.4% during the quarter.

This result appears to be ahead of company-compiled consensus forecasts available on Diageo’s website, which suggested organic sales would fall by 2.3% in Q3.

Year-to-date sales performance is still negative, but a return to top-line growth is a key target for the business. It’s also the kind of early result from turnaround boss Sir Dave Lewis that could help to improve market sentiment towards this unloved stock.

I’ve pasted in the financial summary from today’s update to save retyping:

c2d627ed-1658-42ad-866a-7813939e494d.png

Source: Diageo Q3 26 statement

Geographic split: US slowdown

Diageo isn’t out of the woods yet, though. Today’s update was achieved despite a deepened sales slump in the group’s largest market, North America, which accounts for nearly 40% of group sales.

76ee0d3e-2d6a-45b6-9d40-c3f881d90b5f.png

Source: Diageo Q3 26 presentation

Today’s commentary reflects a mixed performance across the world, especially in spirits. Ready-to-Drink (RTD) and Guinness are more consistent positive themes, with sales up nearly everywhere:

  • North America (Q3 -9.4% / YTD -7.6%): volumes fell by 9.9%, with price/mix growth limited to 0.5% by “the need for a more competitive offer” – i.e. price cuts. Spirit sales fell by 15.4%, driven by tough comparatives and a double-digit decline in tequila. Diageo Beer Company USA sales rose by 9.1%, led by Smirnoff RTD and Guinness.

  • Europe (Q3 +8.8% / YTD +4.3%): sales growth was driven by Guinness in the UK and Ireland and by spirits in the Middle East, Central and Eastern Europe. Price rises contributed 2.6% in Q3, with volumes up 6.3%.

  • Asia Pacific (Q3 -0.7% / YTD -8.2%): sales remained negative, with volumes down by 4.6%. However, performance improved significantly relative to H1. The main drag remained sales of white spirits in China, which “declined double-digit”. This offset low-single-digit gains in sales of international premium spirits. Price/mix rose by 3.8%, reflecting a more favourable product mix. Once again, Guinness contributed to the recovery, with organic sales up by a “double-digit” amount.

  • Latin America and Caribbean (Q3 +16.2% / YTD +7.7%): volumes rose by 10.5% in Q3, with price/mix contributing 5.6%. It looks like there may be some element of restocking here, with “buy-in ahead of the FIFA World Cup and Easter timing”. Brazil delivered double-digit volume growth, offsetting a high-single-digit sales decline in Mexico. Spirits were a winner in this region, with “double-digit scotch growth”. RTDs also performed well, led by Smirnoff Ice in Brazil.

  • Africa (Q3 +17.1% / YTD +12.7%): this region only accounted for 8% of net sales, but saw significant growth with volumes up 20% in Q3, offsetting some weakness in pricing due to a change in product mix. South Africa, Tanzania and Uganda are flagged up, with growth in both spirits (Kenya Cane) and beer (Serengeti). There was also strong growth in RTDs.

Outlook

Although there’s the obligatory caveat about the Middle East, Diageo’s FY26 guidance is unchanged today. That’s reassuring, given that we are less than two months from the year end on 30 June.

While we are mindful of continued geopolitical uncertainty, including the impact of the ongoing conflict in the Middle East on energy, supply and distribution; we are reiterating our fiscal 26 guidance.

After cutting expectations with his maiden update in February, CEO Lewis has given investors the stability they hope for by remaining in line today:

3a05dbf3-61b7-4ec5-91df-6cf6ce7689ba.png

As a reminder, full-year guidance is for a 2.3% decline in organic sales, paired with modest growth in operating profit, aided by $300m of cost savings.

Consensus forecasts prior to today suggest FY26E adj EPS of 161 cents per share, putting Diageo on a P/E of around 12x.

Roland’s view

Diageo is clearly still having problems in North America. Dave Lewis acknowledges this today, promising action:

North America remains our biggest challenge, where market conditions are soft and our offer needs to be more competitive. Actions are already underway to address this.

Despite this, I am struggling to see any reason to be negative on Diageo when it’s trading on 12x earnings and offering a 3%+ dividend yield.

This is a world-leading business with a large portfolio of some of the world’s most valuable and recognised brands.

While patterns of alcohol consumption may be changing, this is ultimately a consumer goods group – Diageo’s brands cover the spectrum from premium to value and include a good number of ‘nolo’ options, including the spectacularly successful Guinness 0.0%.

My feeling is that Diageo may have lost touch with this reality and become complacent during the boom years for spirits premiumisation. I believe it should be possible for the business to reshape its product range to meet current demand more successfully. In my view, the shake-up promised by Lewis is likely to reprioritise marketing and should lead to a gradual recovery in performance.

I was AMBER/RED in February following Diageo’s profit warning and dividend cut.

I don’t think there’s any reason to maintain this negative view following today’s update. Indeed, I think there’s a good chance an AMBER/GREEN view could be justified.

The main reason I’m not turning positive today is that I’d like to see some progress on debt reduction before relaxing too much; Diageo’s net debt to EBITDA multiple was 3.4x at the end of December 2025. That’s a little above my comfort level, even for a business of this type.

To reflect this mix of views, I’m moving up to neutral (AMBER) today, with the hope that I’ll be able to turn more positive later this year. Diageo is on my watch list.


Reach (LON:RCH) 

Down 7.4% at 52p (£165m) - Trading Update - Roland - AMBER =

Today’s trading update from this media group has met with a downbeat reception despite being billed as an inline update.

7eb97ab8-41ec-4e38-85cd-c8c8eb2fa8b4.png

What seems to have happened is that online traffic has been hit by another Google update that’s resulted in a loss of volumes. This continues a trend first reported in July 2025 – my understanding is that there has been more than one such update to Google’s algorithms, putting some pressure on sites that rely on Google traffic.

The increased prominence of AI snippets (culled from other publishers' websites) at the top of Google Search results is unlikely to help either – increasingly, people are finding they don’t need to click through.

The impact of these trends is reflected in the company’s share price, which has fallen by 34% since the company’s half-year results were published on 24 July 2025:

9099d217-c81b-4e30-9779-0ef11cdda670.png

Q1 trading - weak: while Reach doesn’t report user volumes, today’s revenue update makes it clear that both digital and print revenues suffered in Q1:

  • Digital revenue down 8.1%;

  • Print revenue down 6.6%;

  • Group revenue down 6.9%.

Print: Of course, it’s important to remember that print revenues are expected to be falling – print revenue fell by 4.6% last year and Reach’s strategy is to manage the print decline by growing the digital user base to offset the loss of print revenue.

My impression is that print performance in Q1 was largely as expected.

Cost savings are also underway to help support results – the company has previously guided for a 5-6% reduction in adjusted operating costs this year.

Digital: the main concern for me is that digital revenue isn’t rising. The 8.1% decline in digital revenue extends the 7.8% decline reported during the final quarter of last year.

Clearly, the company’s online efforts are not (yet) delivering tangible results. It’s not clear to me how much of this decline is due to Google changes and how much reflects wider factors (including the relative appeal of Reach content versus alternatives such as YouTube).

Outlook

CEO Piers North has left full-year guidance unchanged today, but I would argue that the weak start to the year could mean a greater H2 weighting to profits than previously expected.

Arguably, that increases the risk of a profit warning later this year. Consensus forecasts have been stable for some time though, so it’s possible that the current expectations may be supportable:

b82cad00-90df-4900-beef-b70d6beddd89.png

Pension cash windfall? One other factor to consider is the company’s pension scheme recently purchased a buy-in for its remaining uninsured members. According to March’s results, this has reduced Reach’s total expected scheduled pension contributions by £8.6m.

In an updated note today, house broker Panmure Liberum suggests that this could lead to a significant improvement in free cash flow in 2027 and 2028, potentially providing full cash support for the current dividend.

Roland’s view

The market already knows that Reach is ex-growth and has priced the shares accordingly. If forecasts are maintained – or even if they decline slightly – it’s possible to argue the stock is already too cheap:

e92aa4fa-6759-450f-80c3-a816bc4f117b.png

The forecast dividend of 7.3p is covered by forecast earnings of c.21p, but is not expected to be covered by free cash flow this year. This suggests a further rise in net debt for 2026; net debt (excluding leases) rose from £14.2m to £34.9m last year.

However, this situation is expected to reverse from 2027. Today’s update from PanLib suggests free cash flow could support the dividend from 2027 onwards, potentially underpinning a very attractive 10%+ yield.

It’s also possible that digital performance will strengthen as Google changed bed in and publishers adapt (as they usually do, over time).

I am inclined to be cautious about the opportunity here, but given the low valuation and in line nature of today’s update, I am going to leave Graham’s previous neutral view unchanged today.


James's Section

TBC Bank (LON:TBCG)

Down 1% at 4,654p (£2.62bn) – Q1 Results – James – GREEN =

(At the time of writing, James has a long position in TBCG.)

When I started writing, the stock was up 5%, then down 4%, and now it’s closing in on parity. Clearly, the market hasn’t made its mind up yet, but I have, and I’m reassured.

Personally, TBC Bank is a top-10 holding, sitting between Credo Technologies and Alphabet, and representing one of my largest UK-listed investments:

b277ce57-4c98-4cf4-856e-20ab8d38846b.png

Headline numbers hold up

The company has been caught in the crossfire of two concerns, both outside of its control - Georgian political risk following the post-election protests of 2024/2025, and the US-Iran conflict.

However, today’s numbers confirm that neither is hurting the underlying business. Group net profit came in at GEL 365m, up 15% year on year with ROE at 23.4%. The Georgian business remains the core driver, with 24.1% ROE on 14% earnings growth and 24% growth in net interest income.

As always, banks thrive when the local economy is performing, and the Georgian economy continues to be exceptional. The country’s actual GDP growth in Q1 came in at 9.1%, well above TBC Capital’s own 7.4% full-year forecast.

Countries in which we operate, Georgia and Uzbekistan, are not immune to the fallout from this conflict. However, so far, the economic impact has been relatively muted, and, for now, we still expect to see strong economic growth in both countries in 2026, with a 7.4% real GDP growth forecast for Georgia and 7.9% for Uzbekistan.

Some signs of trouble

Investors should also have their eyes on the figures lurking beneath the headline numbers. Operating expenses rose 20% year on year. Staff costs were up 27% and the cost-to-income ratio climbed from 37.2% to 40.2%. NPLs also rose 36% year on year, with CIB Georgia NPLs more than doubling - that’s something to watch carefully.

What’s more, the Uzbek business continues to drag. Management guided for the Uzbekistan reset at the FY25 results and framed it as a deliberate recalibration following regulatory changes in the country. Net income fell 4% there year on year, ROE slumped to 10.9%, and the loan book is down nearly 10% quarter on quarter.

However, management suggests the pipeline is more encouraging than the numbers suggest. Auto loans and collateralised MSME lending are set to be launched around mid-year.

The former should tie in with the company’s majority investment in OLX Uzbekistan (no longer part of the OLX Group), a classifieds marketplace operating across a wide variety of sectors, including autos, with strong reach across the country.

James’ View

I bought shares in TBC and peer Lion Finance (which reports tomorrow) shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine four years ago. Both performed incredibly well, and I cashed out before the 2024 election - assuming the disruption would be worse for business than it has proven to be. Stayed invested and I’d be up 500% and 1,000% respectively.

As alluded to, I’m back in TBC, and unsurprisingly, it’s the metrics that garnered my interest. Away from the operational challenges, the numbers still look great. The stock trades at 5.6x forward earnings, with a price-to-earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratio in the region of 0.4. These figures point to a vast discount to the sector average globally.

c35a2c13-7b6c-4a4a-9392-87c21e4143a8.png

Profitability metrics are also unmatched. The ROE figure (23.4%) sits far ahead of anything we’d see in the UK, albeit significantly below Lion Finance at 28.1%. Total returns are notably lifted by a dividend yield of 6.4% on a forward basis, with coverage in the region of 2.8x.

13533948-4957-415c-8029-e32768aec9ec.png

These figures, coupled with 15% net profit growth in the first quarter, continue to support my bull case. The company also boasts a strong StockRanks at 82. I’m staying GREEN.

46ce268d-8f79-44ff-a361-36d414c109e6.png


Seeing Machines (LON:SEE)

Up 8.2% at 4.48p (£203m) - Q3 FY2026 KPI Update - James - Amber ↑

Roland left this at RED in January, concerned that a loss-making growth story was trading expensively and that a looming debt refinancing made the risk-reward unattractive. The business had also announced that a customer had made an accelerated lump sum royalty payment of $14.1m, having previously been expected over the next four years. Roland wondered if this was a bailout in disguise.

Today’s update doesn’t resolve all of those concerns, but it does guide towards the inflection point that bulls had been waiting for. Seeing Machines, which makes the driver and occupant monitoring systems (DMS/OMS) that are fitted into cars by manufacturers, earns a royalty every time a device is deployed.

1f2848f7-77d7-419f-b386-8cb07facd7c4.png

Production volumes soar

As such, the latest production volumes are clearly encouraging. The business said that production volumes hit 1.28m units in the third quarter, up 122% on the previous quarter and up 259% year on year.

11d6a605-bc7a-476e-9b67-65cd0aad0d58.png

Source: Seeing Machines Q3 KPI Update

Of course, production figures don’t always mean sales. But Seeing Machines said that Q3 royalty revenue would be higher than royalty revenue for the entire first half of the financial year. The company expects to deliver positive adjusted EBITDA in Q3 and H2 FY2026.

This appears to reflect Seeing Machines’ main catalyst: the European General Safety Regulation, which mandates DMS fitment across new vehicles from July 2026. That deadline is coming quickly into view.

Q3 delivered a clear inflection point for Seeing Machines. Importantly, Q3 Royalty Revenue was higher than Royalty Revenue for the entire first half of the financial year, demonstrating the operating leverage in our Automotive model as production programs scale. The Company expects to deliver positive Adjusted EBITDA in Q3 and H2 FY2026.

Management reported that there are now more than 6.1m vehicles on the road with Seeing Machines driver and occupant monitoring systems, marking an increase of 88% from 12 months ago. While we don’t have the full picture, this points to a truly impressive uptake from its client base.

The aftermarket Guardian business is a slight concern. Unit sales fell to 1,610 in Q3 from 3,764 in Q2, though management says some expected sales have shifted into Q4 and early performance there is encouraging. ARR grew 5% to $14.7m. It is a smaller and slower-moving piece of the business but worth monitoring.

The step-change in quarterly volumes is significant and we believe this marks the beginning of a new phase of higher, more consistent production volumes as we move through the end of FY2026 and into FY2027.

James’ View

The debt refinancing - approx $62m convertible note with Magna International maturing in October - and valuation concerns that Roland raised in January haven’t gone away.

c1860393-a3fb-4e4e-9dfe-3ff436198745.png

And some of those concerns are reflected in the company’s poor StockRanks - just 18. The business trades around 36.2x forward earnings and with a price-to-sales ratio of 4.6 on a trailing basis.

fdc2e326-f83b-4360-b859-169ceac2e0df.png

However, I think there’s some cause to look at Seeing Machines a little differently now. It’s currently trading around 2x forward sales, and that doesn’t look overly stretched for a business that’s apparently approaching inflection point. Those of us familiar with companies near inflection point will also be acutely aware of how quickly a 36.2x multiple can compress.

I'm not ready to go GREEN - the refinancing and Guardian softness keep me cautious - but the inflection promise is real enough to move off RED. AMBER feels right here. Watch Q4 closely.

Disclaimer

This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

37 comments


Avatar for Mark Carter

Roland, thanks for covering the larger caps like Diageo and Next.

4
Avatar for ken mitchell

I agree with Roland. The money wasted on  the  J D Wetherspoon (LON:JDW) buybacks at an average 15% higher then the share price today shows yet again the folly imo of buying back shares ahead of using that money more wisely, and as Roland pointed out the money wasted by J D Wetherspoon (LON:JDW) could have been spent reducing the big debt pile. Calling buybacks that result in a lower share price a “reward to shareholders” as so many commentators do, is ridiculous.

Also the claim that the real test of the success or otherwise of buybacks is when  the share price is higher eventually, is equally wrong. . If future newsflow and Company updates are good, then a higher share price is likely anyway. 

Real rewards are from dividends and specials where shareholders get real money, and not from supposedly rewarding buybacks when they don’t. 

A few Companies buyback sensibly and only go for them when believing their shares are good value, and when the shares aren’t good value opt for special dividends instead. Outperforming Next (LON:NXT) is the classic example of how to do buybacks this way but so often Companies buyback regardless of whether or not they are done at bargain prices. 

16
Avatar for bsharman

Hi Ken. You seem to have a real problem with buybacks! I don't think that it is buybacks that are the problem per se, but when the buybacks are not undertaken strategically to maximise shareholder value for the long term. Here is what Gemini says : 

Core Arguments in Favour of Buybacks

  • Long-Term EPS Accretion: By reducing the total number of shares in circulation, every future pound of profit is divided among fewer owners.
    • Example: If a company reduces its share count by 10% through buybacks, its Earnings Per Share (EPS) will naturally rise by ~11%, even if total profit remains flat.
  • Superior Tax Efficiency: Unlike dividends, which are taxed as immediate income, buybacks are generally more tax-efficient.
    • Shareholders who do not sell defer any tax liability until they choose to exit their position, often benefiting from lower capital gains rates.
  • Operational Flexibility: Dividends are often seen as a "sticky" commitment; cutting them can cause a massive sell-off. Buybacks offer management the flexibility to return cash when it is available and pause during leaner times without the same market penalty.
  • Signalling Undervaluation: When management buys back shares, it is a public signal that they believe the current market price does not reflect the company's true "intrinsic value". 

Academic and Sector Success Stories Research and historical data frequently show that active "buyback" companies can outperform pure dividend-payers over long cycles:

  • The "Buyback Anomaly": Studies indicate that companies initiating large buyback programmes often see significant "abnormal returns" (outperformance) in the months and years following the announcement.
  • Sector Proof Points: Proponents point to companies like AutoZone or Apple.
    • AutoZone has reduced its share count by over 90% since the late 1990s, driving a compound annual growth rate in EPS that far outpaced its actual net income growth.
  • Total Shareholder Yield: Combining buybacks with dividends often produces higher total returns than focusing on dividends alone. S&P 500 Buyback Indices have historically outperformed the broader S&P 500 by an average of 5.5% per year over multi-decade periods. 

Also the claim that the real test of the success or otherwise of buybacks is when the share price is higher eventually, is equally wrong. . If future newsflow and Company updates are good, then a higher share price is likely anyway.

Buybacks reduce the number of shares in issue. The valuation of a business depends on the EPS - which when all things being equal will increase if the number of shares decreases even if the earnings remain the same. If earnings increase as the share count decreases then this should lead to a greater uplift in valuation than if no buyback was happening. I think buybacks are a good thing if the business is fundamentally undervalued, but agree it may take longer to filter through to shareholder returns than the instant gratification of a dividend.

9
Avatar for timarr

I don't think that it is buybacks that are the problem per se, but when the buybacks are not undertaken strategically to maximise shareholder value for the long term

There's nothing fundamentally wrong with buybacks as long as they're a) undertaken at a level where the shares are underpriced compared to fair value and b) the company in question has a decent moat such that future earnings are highly likely to be higher than current earnings. The problem is that all too often buybacks are undertaken when neither of those things is true. 

Estimating fair value - or intrinsic value as Warren Buffett calls it - is as much art as science. But broadly if a company is trading at a significant discount to tangible net asset value or a low price to free cash flow ratio then it's probably discounted. More difficult is where intangible assets are involved - how valuable is the Coca Cola brand for example? 

The bigger problem is often that companies buy back shares and then earnings fall. This happens a lot and always seems to me to be a strong indication of a poor or self-interested management. They shouldn't be buying back shares without good visibility of future earnings.

The Next (LON:NXT) approach is to buy back shares when trading below the company's own estimate of fair value and to pay special dividends when not. The company is an incredible compounding machine and the effect of buybacks has been to enormously increase the earnings per share for remaining shareholders. But it is an incredibly rare example of how buybacks can be made to work.

The J D Wetherspoon (LON:JDW) buyback is a classic example of buying back shares for want of something better to do. Earnings are not entirely consistent - in part due to factors outside of the company's control - and making buybacks while carrying a fairly heavy debt load is not an obviously sensible use of shareholder funds. They'd be better off paying down the debt.

Telecom Plus (LON:TEP) is another example - they've recently announced they'll buyback shares if the market cap is below fair value. We will have to see how this works in practice but in theory, if executed well, this will be accretive to earnings. TEP's earnings are more stable than JDW's, although subject to volatility, and they have far lower debt.  Done well this ought to work but everything depends on execution.

Another buyback case has been investment trusts where many trusts have bought back huge numbers of shares to reduce their discounts to NAV and have no success in doing so at all. My conclusion there is that in many cases the NAV discounts are often illusory - the underlying assets are simply not worth what the asset valuations suggest. In particular illiquid assets without market based valuations don't offer a sound basis for buybacks. Usually the companies would be better off paying out dividends or investing in more assets, which is what investors actually expect them to do.

One other point to note - institutions prefer dividends because they're tax free for them. Individuals (outside of ISAs and SIPPs) should prefer buybacks because of lower or deferred capital gains. So where a company has a large insider holding shares such as with JDW buybacks are more likely. With TEP it's more complex: the company still has a growth runway, but is constrained by dividends. I believe this is a hidden dividend cut but for good reasons. Anyway, I hold TEP, so I will live to eat my words no doubt.

Anyway - buybacks are complex. But what isn't in investing?

timarr

28
Avatar for rmillaree

J D Wetherspoon (LON:JDW)

To be fair to spoons they have probably traditionally traded on p/e of 15 plus for most of their listed life. Its perhaps only in thne last 18 months or so that they have been on a p/e of closer to ten at times - thats perhaps not a real 10 * as the earnings forecasts have been dropping so the reality is a perfact 10 was a not sop good 12. Nonethless they can certainly say shares are trading on more modest rating than they normally do and the wouldnt be wrong.  I dont like companies going ott ref debt - but personally it think its perhaps just at then edge of accepetable levels particularly if they think freehold spending will taper off soemtimes soon and the cash will come rolling in - one thing temporary higher debt does is slighly mask true earning potential - thats when  you can  have a super sweet spot if you can grow profits ignoring finance costs - and you can pay debt down at a  decent lick too at the same tim e reducing finance costs . Perhaps not a surprise that ZIGUP (LON:ZIG) shares took a nice jump upwards withn that jump having held through the recent market woes as soon as they announced they had reached inflexion poinmt ref their debt 9start of december) - hopefully spoons as some stage too may have good news in that regard  too - thats one thing with their estate size remaining fairly static capital spend should be manageable - at present i think being selective about where and when you open sites is uber sensible - times may yet get worse before they improving. 

 

4
Avatar for bsharman

Excellent reply thanks Timarr. One point I would make is that it would always be better to have fewer shares in issue. If earnings are expected to fall then the board should not be buying back but if they do and in the future earnings rise again then those earnings would be spread over fewer shares, and therefore over the long term would have a positive impact (unless a completely terminal declining business) - I'd like to see some of the academic studies on buybacks v dividends or perhaps a topic for a stockopedia deep dive at some point! 

2
Avatar for ken mitchell

I agree that that was a superb post on buybacks by timarr. 

As for academic studies on them, isn’t it better to focus on real examples about their effectiveness or not as timarr did?  

1
Avatar for bsharman

Not really Ken as these are good examples but anecdotal. The effectiveness of buybacks should be measurable based on empirical data over many years and the market as a whole, not just a handful of hand picked examples. 

2
Avatar for timarr

The effectiveness of buybacks should be measurable based on empirical data over many years and the market as a whole, not just a handful of hand picked examples.

The academic research in the area has yielded mixed results with the rough conclusion being "it depends ..."

See: https://www.researchgate.net/p...

"Using a sample of over 9,000 buyback announcements from 31 non-U.S. countries, we find support for the results of studies based on U.S. data: On average, share repurchases are associated with significant positive short- and long-term excess returns. However, excess returns depend on the likelihood of undervaluation and the efficiency and liquidity of equity markets. In contrast to findings in U.S. markets, we do not find that these long-term excess returns are simply a compensation for takeover risk or have become less significant in recent years."

To summarise: buybacks, around the world, are correlated with positive, long-run excess returns. The global nature of the study makes it highly unlikely this is due to sample bias. 

However, the researchers also observe: "The positive short- and long-run excess returns are more pronounced for small, beaten-up value stocks, suggesting undervaluation as a main factor driving the buyback announcement and subsequent returns"

Or to be less academic about it, when the buyback is driven by management correctly believing that their company is undervalued then the buyback tends to correlate with improved share price performance.  When a share is undervalued to start with a buyback often signals a turnaround - but whether the buyback makes a difference or is simply a signalling mechanism is impossible to tell.

Basically, undervalued companies starting buybacks is a buying signal. Otherwise they don't seem to make much difference. Arguably the Telecom Plus (LON:TEP) buyback meets this criterion, while the J D Wetherspoon (LON:JDW) one didn't.

timarr

13
Avatar for abtan

Hi timarr

Thanks for the article on buybacks.

One thing that I thought was missing from the analysis you linked to (unless I missed it - hard to focus when it's gone midnight) was whether bought back shares are actually cancelled or held in treasury. 

I've found in my short investing history that many US-based companies buyback their own shares, hold them in treasury and then give them to management as remuneration i.e. they come back onto the market. 

That sort of defeats the point of doing the share buyback in the first place. 

2 of the examples cited in the research paper - Teledyne Technologies (NYQ:TDY) and Berkshire Hathaway (NYQ:BRK.A) - actually cancelled their shares, and of course the share price of both has done every well over the long term.

An example closer to home that tells the opposite story is Frasers (LON:FRAS) . They've bought back a lot of their own shares - I think more than 50% now - but hold them in treasury and plan to give them to staff if targets are met. 

That would be a lot of shares to flood the market all of a sudden and honestly I'm not sure how the market would react to this. Thinking logically (I think!) surely the share price would crash?

As you might recall I'm a big fan of share buybacks...as long as they are cancelled and can't come back onto the market. Mathematically if you're investing in good companies then the benefits should show up in the share price...eventually.

A

3
Avatar for Shark trader

the site has been really unresponsive the last few weeks. keep seeing this when trying to connect. this was at 3pm today. its not my internet connection as other websites work perfectly well

ac27de38-c2a3-47b2-8e82-a62987a5d896.png

11
Avatar for iain1234

Is it really Tumps ramblings on imminent agreements over the Iran war that's helped the FTSE up 2% ? I cant believe the market is so naïve after all the stuff he's spouted or is there something else I'm missing? 

17
Avatar for PitBullCH

It is, and they are - will be amazed if he doesn't come back in 2 days and spout some more BS to kick the can further down the road.

6
Avatar for Mark Carter

At this point it seems that he's creating such chaos so that his son can get the right trades in beforehand.

2
Avatar for carmensfella

One month to go until: MELLO 2026

The line up is building and we have already announced so many great speakers, companies, fund managers and more. 

Brave Bison (LON:BBSN) Cab Payments Holdings (LON:CABP) Itaconix (LON:ITX) Pathos Communications (LON:NEWS) Merchants Trust (LON:MRCH) Brunner Investment Trust (LON:BUT) all announced recently. 

Until tomorrow night Stockopedia user can get 30% off their tickets with code M26BHSpecial as an extended bank holiday offer. 

2
Avatar for The Boon Fund

The North America (and Europe) problems for Diageo (LON:DGE) seem pretty grim to me....

Although maybe they will find growth elsewhere to offset, from non-spirits, Emerging Markets, and non-alcoholic. But its tough - they don't have a big moat around all these three, with strong competitors.

In Spirits, they have a moat with some strong brands. But here, the problem is that there are few levers to pull.

  • Can't increase/decrease product quality, as its all been set years ago and maturing for years already.
  • Big glut of stock, that can't just sit around forever.
  • Competitors also have big glut of stock. All it takes is for one of them to go distressed and start liquidating into the market, at lower prices.
  • GLP-1 usage on the rise; this damps the amount of alcohol consumed per pax, so each "customer" of Diageo is going to buy less over time. So to get growth, they need to grow their "customer base"; but the TAM of drinkers worldwide has probably peaked.

I'd say probably on the cards, given there are some parts of the group in Growth, and Spirits is challenged.... plus structurally they are quite different parts of the business... is that inevitably, Diageo might be broken up at some point. No idea if this would be value enhancing. Just flagging up a possibility?

3
Avatar for PitBullCH

Is a strong brand really a moat ?

1
Avatar for The Boon Fund

Yes, to me, there's loyalty to brands. There's trust in big brands, especially "Western/foreign" brands in Emerging Markets where local brands may be seen in lacking safety, quality.

But I also accept that there's varying opinions whether Brand Value is real or not or somewhere in-between.

3
Avatar for rmillaree

Is a strong brand really a moat ?

i would say on Practical level the likes of Guiness and Coke are unlikley to run a cropper anytime soon.

is that a moat or not ? facts are Guiness  and coke sales have proved their brand "power" for over 100 years and are perhaps as strong as ever. It might not be a moat to you - but if they have commanded  say 20% of their marketplace niche for say 50 years plus thats a pretty stong indicator  that they have something that others cant match or dislodge.

like anything though the future might not be the same as the past - many well known brands have gone by the wayside so nowt is certain in life.

I would say Guiness and Coke are probably right at the top table of elite brands - perhaps many popular current brands might not be as safe as houses as these elite names in the brand world. If we look at beer sales for example certainly in the uk it all seems  to be names that were not so popular 20 years ago are oftne the default choice now - in that regard though Diageo Carlsberg and the like probbaly still often dictate what choice of beer we can have - aint so easy to find a pint of McEwans nowadays in most parts of the country and i doubt anyone misses not have fosters as an option when they go down their local :)

 

4
Avatar for The Phoenix

Agreed although you will see coke discount diet and zero brands in supermarkets its vary rare to see the original coca cola brand discounted certainly in the canned form.

0
Avatar for Yellowstone Advisory

We still have a few places available for the next Yellowstone Private Investor Evening on 13 May This is a chance to meet management teams and fellow private investors face to face in a relaxed environment. Listen to company presentations and then take the opportunity to ask your questions over drinks and canapes. The following companies will be presenting:

Central Asia Metals (LON:CAML): Gavin Ferrar, CEO

Light Science Technologies Holdings (LON:LST): Simon Deacon, CEO

Fevara (LON:FVA): Joshua Hoopes, CEO and Gavin Manson, CFO

Bow Street (LON:BOW): David Page, Executive Chair and Nick Wong, CFO

Doors open at 5.15pm and the event starts at 5.30pm in EC1

Register here.

#CAML #FVA #LST #BOW

0
Avatar for Revs8

What news did I miss that caused a surge in UK equities at 8.50am? 

4
Avatar for Tim Boucher

Same surge across European markets as well at 09:50 BST - likely related to rumours that the White House thinks it is close to a memo of understanding with Iran to end the war. Fingers crossed, but we'll see - I'm a bit surprised that the markets still think there is any truth or actual facts coming from Washington these days!

27
Avatar for JSchoffer

Welcome back Dr.Fox! Would be great to get your thoughts on the US tech earnings from last week - Alphabet (NSQ:GOOG) seems to be ahead in terms of making returns from AI spending, but keen to see if you saw anything intriguing across the board. 

8
Avatar for Roland Head

Morning JSchoffer,

Thanks for your comment.  I'm afraid these reports are restricted to UK stocks, so we're not in a position to cover US earnings here currently. 

Roland

7
Avatar for Dr James Fox

Hi JSchoffer. Thank you. As Roland said, we don't include non-UK securities in the DSMR, but as a personal note,  it's been an incredible week or so, hasn't it. Alphabet, as you allude to, was clearly a highlight -- so much to like on in the earnings report and the note on non-marketable securities tripling in value. I'm quite heavily exposed to the picks and shovels, but plenty of earnings/market reactions caught me out -- likes of Sterling Infrastructure (NSQ:STRL) won bigger than I anticipated, but 'some' semi companies struggling to justify their valuations. 

2
Avatar for gmtrader

Just need to look at the chart of the semiconductors to see they have gone parabolic. Final stage of a bull run imo. 

3
Avatar for bohenie

J D Wetherspoon (LON:JDW) Not the usual punchy TU from Tim today - He has spent £25m already this year buying in shares at an average price of 680p and the price is today 580p

9
Avatar for bohenie

Oh - and I expect he's not very happy about Ryanair campaign to have airport pubs banned from selling alcohol outside normal pub hours. JDW has a number of airport pubs and  new ones soon to open at Manchester and H'row

5
Avatar for rmillaree

J D Wetherspoon (LON:JDW)

i kinda trust the J D Wetherspoon (LON:JDW) top brass to tell us how it is normally - but they havent covered themselves in glory last 12 months - to be fair to them they have been clobbered by rates ni and minimum wage increases.

Ref rates stuff and ongoing predictions i was wandering if they would tactically prefer to be struggling if thats needed to convince power that be to see sense ref rates etc - i thought they might have been over cautious ref outlokm - as things stand though its probably another downgrade today - i am sure they will lay on thick ref their increased costs with their next formal update (year end results)

 "As many hospitality operators, including Wetherspoon, have reported, there have been substantial increases in costs, which may result in profits slightly below market expectations."

Ref buybacks - its pretty simples really - if later news after buybacks is bad rather than good then at least in the now it will look silly having bought back shares  - the reality is long term performance is  what matters most - so what might look silly now - may look ok in 5 years time if the shares are back above the 1000p long term - they certainly do kind of have egg on their face right now in that regard. I do trust the board - albeit they seem to be out of kilter ref their projections at present so not covering themselves in glory.

Do we see any pickup for them in the medium term -  probably not whilstb teh current lot are in power - compaied like J D Wetherspoon (LON:JDW) are an easy source ref raising extra revenues whilst they leave the likes of facebook google and uber alone - pretty sad. I certainly think at present there is a case for changing  vat rate on eat out food (in preimises) 10%  - that would require making up shortfall elsewhere though - eating establishments are often the lifeblood of a vibrant loacal community.

I was kinda hoping debt would have started to drop by now but for whatever reason (share buyback and freehold reversions mostly) that aint happened yet - they are getting but though and at some stage they wont need to keep splashing the same cash on buying back freeholds at same levels. at present i think them concentrating on better quality units makes sense - eg closing less suitable locations and trying to give each location abiolity to max out sales - eg increaisng beer gardens for them is imho always no brainer money well spent their new beer garden in the Milecastle in newcastle must have cost a  fortune but that will pay dividends if and when we get a  summer this year. Ditto if they are adding accommodation onto sites (as they have done at that newcaslle branch)  - adding acom will no doubt increase beer and food sales everything else being equal.

so whilst the trend here is very poor i havent lost any of my confidence in the J D Wetherspoon (LON:JDW) plan of attack  - even if its very much not paying dividends at present (ref profits they do still pay a divi)

4
Avatar for Lord Gnome

The hot money that brought about yesterday’s mercurial rise in Vanquis Banking (LON:VANQ) has already departed. What on earth were they expecting? A good, solid, steady-as-you-go update was obviously not what they were anticipating. Vanquish wide open as a bid target at this late stage in recovery. 

8
Avatar for gmtrader

Ramsdens Holdings (LON:RFX) another upgrade in forecasts and broker upgrade price target to 587p from 550p. While I see Ramsdens Holdings (LON:RFX) as a alternative gold play, I see it as a barometer on how the general public are doing financially. When people are finding money tight, they pawn items.

20
Avatar for snowdrop

Not the guys paying full price in Next?

1
Avatar for gmtrader

Obviously not those guys. Next is a business on the next level that constantly grows. Exceptional company.

4
Avatar for iwright7

Ramsdens Holdings (LON:RFX) is one of Ed’s Jump shares. Not only has Ramsdens delivered its 3rd consecutive profit upgrade in 3 months, each Jump has exceeded the prior upgrade's magnitude. The day close Jump in March was +8.6%, in April +10.1% and todays has yet to confirmed, but looks like being >10%.

The 3-Rule Jump Setup

  • The company says it’s trading “ahead of expectations”
  • The share price jumps 10% or more on the day
  • The StockRank is above 75 (SR = 96)

The market narrative around RFX centres on the gold price, but the non-gold segments are independently strong: pawnbroking loan book at record £14m (+18% since September FY25 year-end), jewellery retail revenues +25% y/y, and 10–12 new stores are on track. 

At 6.2× FY26E P/E it seems that the market is in disbelief!    Role the on next H1 price  catalyst in early June.

25
Avatar for gmtrader

Good morning. Do you mean the DOW is not hitting new highs and not the Nasdaq?

3
Avatar for Roland Head

Morning gmtrader,

My apologies for the error. Both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq indices closed at new highs last night.

I've corrected the preamble to reflect this. 

Roland

5
Get the free newsletter