105
Archived articleThis is an archived article from 2025 - please note that any content within the article may be out of date.

QVM Portfolio Update - a new all-time high and Alliance Pharma out

Well January has kicked off with a bang, and it’s about to get busier. A tsunami of trading statements is upon us until the end of January, before full year reporting season hots up in late February. Already, we’ve seen several announcements from NAPS portfolio holdings, and one takeover bid now needs decisive action. So let’s dive in.

As I shared in the New Year piece, we’re taking a new direction with this more active version of the NAPS - working title the “QVM Portfolio”. It’s going to respond dynamically to company and market events. Will it outperform the “do-nothing” NAPS? Only time will tell. As of now, the portfolios are the same - but today they diverge.

And what a good start to the year!

The portfolio hits a new high

Alliance Pharma received a takeover bid at a 40.9% premium, the gold miners surged 10-15% and good news from other companies have pushed the valuation higher by 5% since January 1st. This is a new record high valuation, finally breaking out of a drawdown that’s lasted since September 2021.

902b21fd-ac8b-4fa3-b07c-43a638187397.png

Company Updates - what’s been happening?

The team on the daily stock market report have been doing an outstanding job, but here’s a little more colour from me on some of the holdings.

Currys (LON:CURY) - profit ahead of expectations

Trading statement positive

Curry’s was the dog of the portfolio, down 13% on continued retail depression post Reeves budget, but has saved itself with an excellent announcement today. They are guiding profit “ahead of expectations” which we always like and talking more automation and cost savings. They are guiding profit up from £140m to £145-155m for the full year. It’s close to its 1 year high, which is remarkable given the retail climate.

Journeo (LON:JNEO) - contract win and small beat

Contract win & Trading statement positive

Last week, Journeo secured a contract for the Stoke-on-Trent Bus Service Improvement Plan (BSIP), worth £1.4 million. While not hugely significant in the grand scheme of things, it’s a significant portion of the overall £10 million allocated by Stoke to the plan. The BSIP is a national initiative with £1.2 billion of government funding, so Journeo taking a 14% share of this Stoke contract quite promising. There's a nice regulatory tailwind here.

Beyond that the Trading Statement yesterday was solid, with revenue up 9%, and profit before tax expected to hit £5 million, slightly above expectations.

They are still sitting on their £12m cash warchest - we want some action there.

MTI Wireless Edge (LON:MWE) - $1m Israeli contracts

Contract win

MTI Wireless Edge is a tiddler, but it secured three new contracts yesterday from an Israeli “local system house” worth $1 million. These were follow on orders to be delivered throughout the year. The CEO mentioned a growing trend of outsourcing for antenna solutions, which is positive. Nonetheless, eps growth is forecast to be very flat, and this contract isn’t going to shift the needle.

Metals Exploration (LON:MTL) - Condor gold acquisition completes

Acquisition closes

Metals Exploration completes its takeover of Condor Gold today. This brings exposure to new exploration and production regions for the company, at a time when its Runruno mine in the Phillipines is depleting. The deal has been approved and the shares start trading tomorrow. Darren Bowden, CEO is giving a live presentation on Investor Meet Company Thursday evening. Given the lack of broker research this presentation should offer shareholders valuable insights. I'll be on the call.



The Alliance Pharma Takeover - Time to Sell?

But the big mover for the portfolio is Alliance Pharma (LON:APH).  A takeover bid came in from major shareholder DBAY Advisors at 62.5p a 40.9% premium to the 44.4p close on the 9th January. If you haven’t read up on takeovers, you can learn more in Mark’s excellent piece in the Academy.

Shareholders have a few options.

  1. You can sell some or all of your position now.
  2. You can wait to receive full proceeds from the takeover:
  • either receiving 62.5p in cash
  • or receiving unlisted "rollover shares".

These rollover shares would make you a shareholder in an unlisted, private company post-takeover. This comes with risks: limited liquidity, no clear dividend policy, and no certainty around when you might benefit from equity upside.

My view is why bother?

Ok, the shares are being bid in the market for 61.1p - a slight discount to the takeover price. If you wait you might pick up a 6-8% annualised return. But the NAPS has historically delivered 13% annualised, plus dividends. We believe we can do better reinvesting the capital.

So that's what we'll do - we'll sell to the merger arbitrageurs and move on. 

QVM Rule #1: Sell all on a Recommended Takeover Bid.

What now? Replacement Candidates

So now need to find a replacement stock for the portfolio. Sticking with our rules-based process, we’ll replace Alliance Pharma with another high-ranked healthcare company. The top ranked Healthcare stocks aren’t quite up to scratch:

  1. Beximco Pharmaceuticals (LON:BXP) - it’s dual-listed, which means its primary listing is on a foreign exchange. It was excluded from the NAPS on this basis, and it’s an immediate no.
  2. Integrated Diagnostics Holdings (LON:IDHC) - it’s foreign-currency denominated. I don’t want to deal in dollars on LSE. It’s another no.

I’ve been burned in weird listings too many times on the UK stock exchange… so:

QVM Rule #2: Avoid all dual-listed and foreign currency denominated stocks.

Enter SDI group

So this brings us to the next highest-ranked stock in healthcare - SDI (LON:SDI) - a once high flyer that has struggled recently. For a long time, many viewed it as the heir to Judges Scientific - as an acquisitive rollup company in the healthcare space. But it's not been as successful in choosing self-managing companies to acquire. The big question is whether they can turn things around?

Well, that's not a question for me to answer. Just like the NAPS, the QVM Portfolio is going to load up on high-ranked stocks, and let the weighing machine of the market do its work. SDI has a really horrible chart, and the only smooth trend is downward. I don't like the technicals but it trades far below its long term P/E, and maybe the bearishness is overdone. Mark seemed to think so recently in the DSMR with an Amber/Green rating.

It enters the portfolio today.

QVM and NAPS - starting to diverge

This QVM Portfolio will diverge gradually from the NAPS. The portfolio will maintain a very high exposure to high-ranked Stocks, but the rules will not be set in stone. We’ll be selling on profit warnings and takeover bids, and using stop losses, but the buy rules are going to be subject to change as we move through the year. And I’m not ruling out some significant changes towards much more dynamic buy rules. So stay tuned as this evolves.

Here are the movers year to date before the latest changes:

Ticker

Gain %

Stock Rank™

Mkt Cap £m

Sector

APH

34.0

73

330

Healthcare

MWE

24.4

89

45

Technology

SRB

17.3

99

96

Basic Materials

SHEL

8.4

96

163123

Energy

MTL

7.0

98

106

Basic Materials

SUP

4.0

98

213

Industrials

SEPL

3.8

99

1183

Energy

SRAD

3.3

98

181

Industrials

JNEO

3.1

92

48

Technology

TCAP

2.3

99

1956

Financials

YU.

1.9

97

311

Utilities

HIK

1.0

94

4426

Healthcare

VOD

0.9

96

17147

Telecoms

IMB

0.5

99

21682

Consumer Defensives

OCN

-0.4

98

453

Industrials

CURY

-2.9

98

929

Consumer Cyclicals

IPF

-3.1

98

276

Financials

MPE

-5.2

99

497

Consumer Defensives

KGF

-5.4

96

4159

Consumer Cyclicals

BPM

-6.8

98

257

Financials

Disclaimer

This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

28 comments


Avatar for Nonns

I’m probably being a bit dense but how does qvm differ from naps? I must have missed the defining difference.

0
Avatar for Rusty2

It is covered in the above article. QVM includes buying a new stock, when one is taken over, stop losses and profit warnings were mentioned. Not sure if this has happened or not.

0
Avatar for Nonns

Yes but are their other criteria or is it still essentially an initial naps selection just with the added response rules to certain events?

0
Avatar for Rusty2

Yes same as NAPS but reacts to events and may replace certain stocks. NAPS just runs for 12 months, with no changes.

2
Avatar for Nonns

Thank you that’s helpful.

0
Avatar for Lindsey Wright

Im a little late in setting up my NAPS and healthcare has changed quite abit..... is animal health included in healthcare for the purposes of NAPS/SNAPS.

0
Avatar for Rusty2

Yes animal healthcare is in the  Health sector: https://www.stockopedia.com/se...

CVS (LON:CVSG) is one. ECO Animal Health (LON:EAH) also.

0
Avatar for Lindsey Wright

thanks

0
Avatar for GeriatricDave

Would NAPS or QVM work on the Australian mkt given it is heavily biased towards Banks and big mining companies? Are there exit strategies if a company falls a lot in stockrank?

0
Avatar for Edward Croft

Alliance Pharma delisted today.    The decision made to switch into SDI (LON:SDI) on the bid has been a good one.  After an initial drawdown, it's risen very sharply in the last few weeks - now showing a 28% gain. 

2
Avatar for ISAallowance

Well, the outcome of the decision to switch into SDI (LON:SDI) has been a good one.  Difficult to say the decision itself was a good one based on a single outcome.

Also worth noting that the bid for Alliance Pharma (LON:APH^E25) did in fact get increased after the sale, although only a small amount, from 62.5 to 64.75p.

1
Avatar for Tim Boucher

Any insights on Journeo (LON:JNEO)? SP down 10%+ this year, and has continued the slide since start Jan despite the ahead of expectations RNS on Jan 14. Looks to be relentless sell pressure (several RNSs on large holders reducing stakes), or is there something more fundamentally wrong that I'm missing?

0
Avatar for Edward Croft

I have JNEO down 6.5% YTD - which seems pretty normal - though underperforming the FTSE significantly.  I don't have any more insight on JNEO than in the last update in this article.  

JNEO isn't a terrifically exciting company, Graham/Roland don't love it - as they think there aren't strong growth opportunities.  But it does have a nice solid, tailwind of government subsidies in its sector - do look at the BSIP and ZEBRA schemes. 

It's small, illiquid and prone to swings in price.   25% of the market cap is in cash.  Strip that out and it's a cheap stock.

 I may be writing a piece on stop losses for the QVM portfolio, as at some point one of the ailing positions will nudge towards my "half annualised volatility" rule of thumb there.    JNEO annualised volatility is almost 50%.  So it's far away from any stop loss trigger at the mo. 

8
Avatar for Tim Boucher

Thanks for the reply Ed - that annualised volatility rule is an interesting line of thought, I'll look forward to the piece!

2
Avatar for Paul Walton

A month in my NAPS active portfolio with a bias towards best trend, has performed a credible 9.32% since 05/01/2025 with Tpximpact Holdings (LON:TPX) having to be sold this week. Good Energy (LON:GOOD) will have to be replaced also

c503b816-ee8a-487d-a1f0-426bccc5bef5.png

The 'leave alone' NAPS has performed admirably (2.81% gain) with the replacement for Alliance Pharma (LON:APH) Hikma Pharmaceuticals (LON:HIK) increasing 13% in the meantime

d0ffcb0e-4393-427e-b2a2-9224901a3ac0.png

3
Avatar for Steve Watson

Thanks for the update Ed, really interesting. Please forgive me if I have missed them, but have you published a full list of the rules that you will be managing this new portfolio to, or will they develop over time, similar to the way the NAPs portfolio changed its SR to VM and QM components over the years? 

1
Avatar for Edward Croft

Steve - no I haven't published the new rules.  They are going to organically evolve based on research.   To be clear - it will still be a highly "factor exposed" portfolio (i.e. high ranked, good, cheap, strong stocks), but I'm keen to introduce more tactical rules based on market events. 

If the research I'm doing is anything to go by, then it's likely to include a more opportunistic element based upon significant "ahead of expectations" announcements in high-ranking stocks.  I also anticipate that some holdings may end up being held longer term.  

The goal I'm setting myself is to minimise discretionary action.  I've a codename for this alternative portfolio as the "RIPS" portfolio.  The "rank inflection point system".   I was originally anticipating it would be based upon large StockRank jumps, but my unfinished research on that was inconclusive that jumps added any extra value.   

Now, with all the text analysis tools out there, I believe that news analysis holds the key.  That's ironic, as it's what all the serious investors do out there anyway.  But what I'm seeking is a rules-based solution that actually doesn't rely on me reading the news.  I am quite hopeful that our platform development will get us there over time. 

12
Avatar for GeriatricDave

RIPS I would prefer RIPAS = Rest in peace and Sleep at night portfolio!

0
Avatar for Andy Sav

I'm liking this new approach and have high hopes on its performance. Just wondering, you mention sell rules, and I'm guessing I'm jumping the gun here; do you think the sell rules will be similar to what you have mentioned before i.e a drop in stock rank to below 80  with a % drop depending on Risk Rating of Stock i,e Speculative etc (something like that, from memory). Thanks

2
Avatar for Edward Croft

Regarding the sell rules-I am not ready to disclose them fully. We are doing quite a lot of work and research into the news. I am seeking to develop news based triggers - let's just say that some are in the research phase.

There are obvious ones. For example in this article selling on a recommended takeover bid. On a hostile bid, more discretion may be required, I read somewhere that 17% of takeover bids receive another offer. But that's more likely in a hostile bid situation.

Another one from our research is selling immediately on a profit warning.
But there are other more subtle cues.

There is also the question of more market based sell rules. Stop losses and market timing overlays.  There is lots to do and to back up with data.




19
Avatar for Andy Sav

Thank Ed 

0
Avatar for Francis Mills

I have been mulling rules around selling in a NAPS portfolio I have in the Australasia market, I have an article discussing its progress here. There are 2 virtues though of the NAPS-based portfolio that I think would be hard to go against: firstly, the hands-off style, least intervention; secondly, minimizing unnecessary brokerage costs. For me therefore selling should be based more on trigger points, perhaps, a % loss threshold or a fall to e.g. 3% of portfolio value. I see the sense though of responding to highly negative news, some fundamental change for the business.

The danger though of news and events is that you are moving back to sentiment, stories and emotions, that sliding scale, the issues for which the Q, V and M Ranks were meant to counter.

0
Avatar for davidallen77

I probably would of gone with Spire Healthcare (LON:SPI) but SR is not high enough for naps

1
Avatar for Saltash Bob

Thanks Ed, for the NAPs advice today, keeping me on the straight and narrow, although it took a great deal of mental anguish parting company with my recently beloved shareholding in high ranking BXP declared by you a no-no in place of Alliance Pharma. However, closer inspection of institutional shareholder information, soon showed me that you and Graham in his report, were not alone in thinking SPI the much better long term bet. Things do seem to be progressing well for your list of favourites lately, well done.

3
Avatar for Wheeler1

Thanks Ed - will review. Started my NAPS a couple of weeks ago. Hybrid approach to SLs. Using them for unfamiliar (to me) more speculative sectors such as gold miners but not for rest. 

1
Avatar for Funderstruck

Thanks Ed for the comprehensive up date;  i certainly  prefer the Active approach  and in the words of Dr, David Paul's mantra 'to get & stay wealthy it is imperative to minimise losses'

13
Avatar for John Doonan

The loss of David continues to be a real blow to us VV orphans!

4
Avatar for Jeff Hunter

That is very sad news I didnt know he had passed a really nice guy 

2
Get the free newsletter