31
Archived articleThis is an archived article from 2022 - please note that any content within the article may be out of date.

SIF Folio: iEnergizer could deliver 6% yield and 20% growth

The recent stock market wobble has combined with growing caution economic growth to cut the results of my SIF folio share buying screen to just eight stocks. Most of them are already portfolio members, or else are unsuitable for some reason.

By disabling individual screening rules, I can see that valuation and weakening momentum are the main roadblocks. Disabling either my earnings yield or 1yr relative strength rules increases the number of qualifying stocks from eight to over 30.

In search of new ideas, I’ve turned to the relaxed version of my screen. This offers a wider range of stocks, due to slightly more relaxed valuation criteria.

My rules stipulate that I shouldn’t buy from the relaxed screen unless I’ve been unable to buy a stock from the main screen for at least four weeks. For this reason, I won’t add a new stock to the portfolio this week. But I might be able to line up a potential purchase for some time in the near future.

iEnergizer (LON:IBPO)

The company I’ve chosen to look at is £746m AIM stock iEnergizer, an outsourcing group based in India. iEnergizer’s services are divided into two segments:

  • Business process outsourcing (63% of FY21 revenue): providing services such as call centres, technical support and back-office services. Sectors include healthcare, banking, insurance and gaming.
  • Content delivery (37% of FY21 revenue): outsourced provision of eLearning and digitisation services

It’s a fairly sizable business, with revenue of $200m and $60m of profit last year. I’m not sure if the company has much of a following among UK investors, but the shares have been a multibagger for investors who have spotted the opportunity in recent years:

WZVQwXxLweG6Gek9u7lpumFUWnmg_HUwYcwUa5cz_dw71Z9OUsrjziv4so405HBZM20ToQOM4pJ8Dws8WLO5FFdB13UnqFV6XZW1ABDGWAx1vedD8_AhKWXm09nIefOSWxYdELhm3V-CtExRLg

These share price gains have been backed by solid profit growth:

VPnTtfJGhhUeNghujp35gcerYUaKcCnkjgfFPBurjS7sSn3UXT24A5QrQtVjkXP7wlftsdezPUq-jMEBj379JCo6nv5y0W1rM7HQRiUxLmV72fIH9WJw0GrxjgRaZ71txQWpEem93HGflLRuBg

And the business appears to have gained the support of a number of well-known institutions:

UK4xqw9qjvCf2-TK75XcyiXYYwa0u8VURxhYQ0O6YrXL1osrKc7a2p4oocggGBkG39MoxAR6rRcmbgop3SVles2hZPThsRqULIH1iLGwsuxRELXH2ryO_1tYqeWH-m0yANr7vnvsU7-o-ygLgg

The elephant in the room here is the presence of controlling shareholder and founder/CEO Anil Aggarwal, who effectively retains complete control over the business. iEnergizer’s free float is small, at 17%. Although liquidity does not seem too bad, I’d guess it could be a problem during a sell-off.

iEnergizer is well-rated by Stockopedia’s algorithms and has strong quality and momentum scores.

51yOT-9lGFwNQ5HvswmEDDFTAtGRLGF1RKby3vCih6W-iTAtTXm9AWJ0YWOALnYQNx7qkKLQHnKqug3MfI5UYNCjWfx0GxsO5DhYJy3TB9zMa2sFTfH0bTW_TZ_nAHoxB37apJFbdraftA9Wmw

p4KoOoStjZ4A609dj1nfwK363V51SEGWbPuUvcgOb5rynz39S4N8emHYS-EE_8kA3B8BfA-75pfk1uVzVdIaWMXN06ZF-vtnbB_a5LS5F8C1eDg_LYlk9NH3AzUPIfm6SVaa68pDW48j0GD1zQ

I think the stock could be worth a closer look.

Value: better than it seems?

ValueRank: 46

iEnergizer’s ValueRank of 46 and High Flyer rating suggests the shares may not be especially affordable. The valuation chart on the StockReport looks rather mixed:

SV7C6UAzApKeFixceP-hc8dz42QTkqb1gsRVH9v7uBZoCsa4J3q92PKv7qqdqpVcdDJVy-KgmPp9ZFFvrngNMUuoz-HWmkvcRycbzH8bpRci3rSAu8NIdUeQv90Tw6x90IDXH1FXRcrq6LcpQA

Cash flow: As this is a service business, I think the main metric to focus on here is price/free cash flow. For a growing business, a price/free cash flow ratio of 12.6 seems very affordable to me, implying an 8% free cash flow yield.

My sums suggest underlying earnings per share broadly in line with Stockopedia’s estimates, so I’m happy to rely on this figure.

Earnings: The second valuation number that interests me is the price/earnings ratio for the same period. This comes in slightly higher, at 15.3. This implies earnings were slightly lower than free cash flow per share.

I think this can largely be explained by non-cash charges such as depreciation and amortisation, which appear to be greater than cash capital expenditure.

iEnergizer’s free cash flow has historically tracked ahead of its earnings, according to Stockopedia:

xlghkrYJGyJzs2CS_HDhz_Vl9JYOyC4W72T4sNCziPKB4X6dO7Agqi2IO-hpvpICCXudkALxLXNGzxNjA_09xha-nl0Ge7huWT4ZCWV_wzd_gWazi1Sq4pgrvVuXDVH9yHaBfLxGbYEo_zfo5Q

Debt: Strong cash generation has allowed the company to maintain a fairly strong balance sheet.

03PpXv0NiAFVXLc8T1AucE6naQxxVeyDF1Ufz7jRgnhx8fb45zoqg8mA8pBRI0iyy4kEbfU170I4z3HNxpPCBS9M3eGM4RwAXIZWyrLQvaVFlTlDpbEQ3yOHnQOgLAvVR7wXojHQQuqm3l9eAw

Last year’s sudden increase in debt was due to a new credit facility being taken out to repay existing debt and fund a large special dividend of $127m (49.4p per share).

Although I’m not a fan of using borrowed cash to fund dividends, iEnergizer’s debt levels remain comfortable, in my view. Net debt of $111m at the end of September represented leverage of 1.4x EBITDA.

Dividend yield: Last year’s ordinary dividend (excluding the special payout) gives the stock a trailing yield of 4.7%. For the year ended 31 March, broker forecasts suggest a yield of 5.2%. However, the company’s results have not yet been published, so we can’t be sure.

This level of income looks potentially attractive to me, as it appears to be supported by strong cash generation.

My view: I think iEnergizer looks reasonably valued when measured against earnings and free cash flow generated by the business.

Quality: very profitable

QualityRank: 85

iEnergizer scores highly for quality, thanks largely to its strong profitability:

ZLsilmz4OQ7tUnFyW24E4RdNb_fADbL_5n_f0wrm98x6AU5UIDmuVeWCt1Nfi04Ni1IC-ydT6O-bam_K5iuoAbqtF183jdrmTiRTOfakCBTS51BPcU3RtYZFqIw36dam2freFBsTVO0NEt3LhA

These are excellent figures in my view. Profitability seems to have steadily improved in recent years, although I’m not sure how much further these numbers are likely to rise.

LvbUQFfnTUVd_zVgcftOr-ymjxicILTRAf9ZEhla__ze6hW4msQRJCDxE6tKzpUrG3HVrfloD8_ng_wEKmCGJXENsi-GVg-jpP9rUtbvU3tJYjeTVleL8NEJ5VqHZzCbRw97uheRKs8iVvutiQ

The stock’s high quality score is also supported by a solid F-Score rating, showing improving fundamental health across a range of nine criteria:

OCjojCBLFC-DjopOjns-svSkekFQSyMzxTEEICCeBShqZ117qakSgXPmrjDwiupvobGkuTBsoLuiFXwTFDhvBoQKSi23SrtuhP93mg0ADljm0BVquk5dORSZytj-a0A2KO4XbXFuGsjwq9Rb-Q

My view: iEnergizer appears to enjoy high profitability and excellent cash generation. Based on these figures, I’ve no concerns about the quality credentials of this business.

Momentum: very promising

MomentumRank: 91

I’ve already touched on iEnergizer’s strong track record of share price and profit growth. The question is whether these attractions will remain intact in more uncertain economic conditions.

As usual, I’m going to split the MomentumRank into its two core factors in order to take a closer look at this situation.

Price momentum: iEnergizer’s technical momentum appears to be quite strong. Based on technical factors such as moving averages and relative strength, iEnergizer scores well:

QtCd53PwX5QbFoKkQzG_ZI8geBJEAtivO50Dl8YafYsAhh6mBflKQxOPcGIedh8pfCvWkkH9tjPD-AnM_zD_mM2kvMooY9tgH5Xj2B-aFALiCgf3frfXNrMSooMaWgpQxmm9ru1ITgtO_IAhdg

Earnings estimates: The company’s most recent trading update was on 21 February and guided for “another record year significantly above last year’s numbers”.

This statement appears to have triggered a material upgrade to FY22 and FY23 earnings forecasts from iEnergizer’s house broker:

MOTKKfju5CiG1t5n6oKAaB5rVvVa4x1zYMCU9n0H2EH3E2LD-xaw9sp3jvQOfMNnuVRXeGBnDrM-VoUownQGIIrPYTlq0qKFhjMusME90Mc9DhCUfOhUl35ViPHc3lR6sh_1NT6gWEmwJgBhTg

Much has changed in the world since 21 February, so I’ll be interested to see an updated outlook statement from the company in June, when iEnergizer’s results for the year ended 31 March are expected.

Current broker forecasts suggest earnings growth of 30% in FY22 and 20% in FY23. Based on these forecasts, the shares currently trade on 12 times forecast earnings, with a potential dividend yield in excess of 6%:

QbjjEfJxsZwSvQFJFU7GfIqnZlUlfYqZUJNONrgWhpBliujtYk4p1m2wQmMRotb6NgNcPaKGwKJIXTQNLy-yLDyeYGbEqZqe2nGsgzrQv_oIHlrpWlyplKLdpTPzvgNvTKcjL5vALZGORqhRnQ

My view: iEnergizer shares do not look overly expensive to me and appear to be enjoying strong momentum. If this can be maintained, then I think the stock could have significant upside potential from current levels.

My verdict

My rules don’t allow me to add iEnergizer to SIF today. But I’ve been impressed by the profitability and growth of this business. I’d certainly consider adding this stock to SIF if the opportunity arose.

I estimate that a 12% share price drop would be required for the shares to qualify for my main buying screen today. That’s around 350p – a level the shares saw briefly in May and in March. I don’t think it’s too hard to imagine a repeat over the coming months, so perhaps a patient approach will allow me to secure a better entry point.

If I do get a chance to add iEnergizer shares to SIF, I’ll report my decision here before I make any virtual or real trades. For now I will watch and wait, ahead of June’s full-year results.

I’d be interested to hear more from subscribers with experience or opinions on this business. I haven’t researched iEnergizer itself in much detail – that’s not part of my SIF process. What am I missing? Are there risks I’ve overlooked?

Disclaimer

This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

10 comments


Avatar for TheRaven

Today's news - good or bad? Share price down,  unlike Go Ahead Group.

0
Avatar for Brothersinarms

I seem to remember the founder doing a placing to himself at an 80% discount to the market price a few years ago.  Bargepole for me since then.

1
Avatar for Benson

Like other contributors I have held these shares on 2 occasions in the past On both occasions they were difficult to buy and to sell ie 3 to 4 weeks on each occasion!   But on both occasions my profit was 100%  so perhaps I am prejudiced and it was a much smaller company? For all of the important issues pointed out previously it still seems a well managed business capable of finding new areas of expansion 

0
Avatar for Cuddlesticks

I previously held but sold as I didn't like the ownership concentration both in light of the large dilution (albeit a few years ago) but also due to poor transparency.  Being domiciled in Guernsey interims and annual reports are light in detail and there is little in the way of investor presentations or engagement/communication. 'Less is more' seems to be their approach re transparency.

Whilst the underlying business appears to be strong and growing, I don't see a coherent strategy or if they're simply opportunistic around delivering services to a small number of key clients. In FY21, 49% of revenue was from 5 customers and there are sizeable provisions and rebates which makes me question how robust revenues are and whether there are multiple customer disputes, potentially increasing the risk of losing a cornerstone customer. In summary, while the high level financials look good governance concerns keep me out of this one.

11353cb20b9ad204c4cc046c38229d49dff384cd1652870740.png
4
Avatar for bryaz

With ref to alsatia it is possible to hold delisted shares certainly in a sipp i currently hold a company that delisted a couple of years ago. As for IBPO  there was a fund raising which was a bit underhanded i think it was in 2015.I do currently hold this stock

2
Avatar for Alsatia

I have just sold my shares in IEnergiser.  I have received a Corporate Action Notice regarding a possible suspension and delisting.  IEnergizer Limited has announced the appointment of Strand Hanson Limited as the company’s Nominated Advisor.  Arden Partners plc will continue to act as Joint Corporate Broker.  Given the timing of the completion of the recommended takeover of Arden Partners plc, the London Stock Exchange plc has agreed that subject to initial due diligence being undertaken, Strand Hanson Limited has until 5pm on 27 July
2022 to complete its full due diligence.  

 There is a risk that if Strand Hanson Limited does not continue to act as nominated adviser following completion of its full due diligence and the Company has not found an alternative nominated adviser, the Company's AIM securities may be suspended pursuant to AIM Rule
1. If within one month of that suspension, the Company has failed to appoint a replacement nominated adviser, the admission of its AIM securities will be cancelled.

As I understand it if the shares are delisted they are no longer eligible for inclusion in an ISA or SIPP. 

I would think this scenario would deter most investors from buying these shares, at least until the situation becomes clearer at the end of July or even later.

7
Avatar for Roland Head

Hi Alsatia,

Thanks for flagging this up. I have to admit that I saw the "Appointment of Nominated Adviser" RNS but didn't read it. It looked routine and I didn't make the connection with Arden.

I agree that I certainly wouldn't want to end up holding an unlisted stock. I'm not sure how likely this is to happen with iEnergizer (LON:IBPO) but there does appear to be a theoretical risk. 

My guess is that it's not a big risk. iEnergizer has a £750m market cap, is highly profitable and has been listed for over 10 years. However, as outside investors we can't ever be quite certain, so I think such risks are always worth considering.

Regards,

Roland

5
Avatar for LittonOwl

WRT New Nominated Advisor - Would have thought if this had been a genuine risk of this there would've been quite a sharp share price reaction on the day of the RNS (27 April 2022), with those 'in the know' heading quickly for the exits. As it happens the SP finished slightly positive on both the day of the announcement and the following day.

1
Avatar for BnB

Hi Roland. You've identified the most obvious risk embedded in the whim of the largest shareholder. From an operational point of view I would highlight that India is losing competitive advantage in outsourcing to eastern Europe and Latin America because of spiralling wages on the sub-continent. This has to hit margins or quality of service (less able employees). Secondly, business process outsourcing is threatened as more and more processes are conducted via automation in the form of UX, AI and digital assistants. Finally the accelerating trend towards onshoring is not supportive.

Perhaps those risks are reflected in the lowly rating next to IT outsourcers like Infosys. And the operating numbers are certainly very attractive. But I rejected after some consideration because I perceive this is not a long term winner, even if it could be good to run with for a short period.

7
Avatar for Roland Head

Hi BnB,

Thank you for your comments. I agree that we may now have passed peak outsourcing, especially to India - but I think it's still a sizable business.

I'd guess that to become a long-term winner, iEnergizer (LON:IBPO) may need to focus on moving up the value chain. Without more in-depth research, I'm not sure to what extent this might be happening  (or not). 

Roland

2
Get the free newsletter