90
Archived articleThis is an archived article from 2024 - please note that any content within the article may be out of date.

SIF Folio Q3 review: fully invested despite uncertain outlook

As we head into the final quarter of the year, it is perhaps harder than usual to ignore the external factors that could affect the market over the coming months – and in some cases already are affecting investors’ behaviour.

Close to home, investment news headlines are being dominated by talk of potential tax changes in this month’s Autumn Budget. UK consumer spending and economic growth also seem a little uncertain.

Further afield, November’s US presidential election and the growing geopolitical risks in the Middle East and Ukraine may be relevant.

We don’t yet know how these factors (and others) might affect corporate results. So far, the combination of stable earnings forecasts and weaker share prices has meant that my rules-based SIF portfolio has remained well populated with new stocks, especially small caps.

I haven’t seen a repeat of the shift to cash that my rules-based system has enforced in the past.

That might still happen. Or I could instead find myself long and wrong on UK equity.

For now, however, let’s take a look at the state of the portfolio after the third quarter, when SIF comfortably outperformed the wider UK market.

SIF Q3 performance review

As a quick recap for recent subscribers, the SIF Folio is a rules-based portfolio. I select shares to buy from the results of this stock screen.

The SIF folio tracked here is a model portfolio, but I also make all the same trades in a portion of my own personal portfolio.

The overall focus of the screen is on value and momentum, alternatively described as growth at a reasonable price. Typical holding time is nine months – this is a trading strategy, not a long-term buy and hold approach.

You can find a more detailed explanation of the SIF system here and a full archive of past coverage here.

Performance

The portfolio’s performance has recovered from the decline in May/June that I discussed in my half-year update.

SIF was up by 12% for the year-to-date at the end of September, versus a gain of 6.6% for its FTSE All-Share index benchmark.

This is a satisfactory result, in my view, but much could still change in the final quarter of 2024.

AD_4nXclS2kDFdBVyoSOFx_YGUBmd47MIRQuQSVaedGElqRChS_XDCZxRJpG61H-l8Nw0zzYvJ32jtaRtjKuQ0tf5RgZVmd9ZqT-4dteMkCdJ_6uljLhVCb3VZG8w2awrgSdySnD3Z2W_IbQM0oPNv1Bu88cry_i?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

On a longer-term view, here’s how the portfolio has performed against the wider market since its inception in April 2016:

AD_4nXd9yeiL0kK_lOrP-nXTQ3TXdfYqQN-zmhuKlIdRqpjFMNhTYTXntV7ZIbppTSEV-iOVLJcVltlQwyY1AZBcbBXvOvX_icbr_a7oL-hmAva0Reyh3dXJ8E2Gh92FbNd_Cy_ltY4KVFegcVi4qxz0hKFyZKSN?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

The portfolio has gained 97% since its inception in April 2016, equivalent to 8.3% annualised. This includes estimated costs but excludes dividends.

Including dividends, my records suggest the portfolio has delivered a total return of 132%, or 10.4% annualised.

SIF doesn’t target income specifically, but my screening rules do require all companies to pay a dividend. I do this because I believe regular dividends provide benefits for investors, including enforcing greater capital allocation discipline on company management.

SIF portfolio review

I added five new stocks to the portfolio and sold seven during the third quarter.

This left SIF with 16 open positions at the end of September, in line with my target number of holdings. (Follow these links for details of my Q1 trades and Q2 trades.)

Here’s a snapshot of the SIF portfolio on 2 October 2024, after my June trades were completed:

AD_4nXfaUyeUL311BwGjsdh3PU6vb-Sr2DayNJTzuPPvhjhkF3j_gXXPY9T9Ullm7XPY3alWDxt5a00b1tljpu1ZzXoXRjGIvP9hTZks9cpF_0CLUCb9tHs7sMHxL6c2YP3sV87B-oSVITX1-diqTDsjigBqtDXW?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

Stocks sold in Q3

I sell shares from SIF by following a set of rules, not by making a discretionary decision.

After an initial holding period of nine months, stocks must pass all of the rules in my selling screen in order to stay in the portfolio. In other words, they must appear in the results of the screen.

Stocks will also be sold if they fall more than 25% below my purchase price or issue a profit warning.

Here’s a review of the stocks I sold during the second quarter, including the profit or loss achieved on each holding.

Galliford Try Holdings (LON:GFRD)

This construction group had recovered from its pandemic-era lows by the time I added it to SIF. But my purchase in April 2023 came just ahead of a terrific run that saw both earnings forecasts and the share price rise steadily.

AD_4nXeAks3C9mEfAKRdWsgLUq0xxlEuVsu6I_spucG71RE73AYTpAu2y33296E5c_cCyYK2sE_zTb4ynQW9JUgnF8_-GLRnYJwGcSuYE96MRvi0nJmyyab7u34OD7U7Ekd61vBXduRzVJD0ZV2CpF9OM-5Kprc2?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

AD_4nXfjCEgX9Z8Jaz77QDOZuSCP2rVxu2QlIOafqCTTPvHXzjW0KI6ZAsVCzFYzrLk3YCYYypMB9WsMnO5p07q1EZcCOTyXva2CetNaRfj1DY_2dmPSZH1loDvpBu7OB3C0XynN0kITNxmJjK7O6CZDc4_3Mvg?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

Trading still appears to be positive and the company has continued to announce regular new contract wins. But this remains an ultra-low margin business in a sector that’s prone to periodic problems.

I would also argue that the forecast P/E of 13 is not especially cheap for a business of this kind, especially as earnings growth is expected to slow over the coming year.

This combination has lifted the stock’s PEG ratio, causing Galliford to drop out of my screening results in July. I admit I was quite relieved when this finally happened and I was able to lock in a handsome 80%+ return, including a 13% contribution from dividends.

Bought: 178p on 14 April 23

Sold: 303p on 30 July 24

Total return (inc. dividends & costs): +83%

Zotefoams (LON:ZTF)

Did I sell Zotefoams too soon?

I suspect the answer will depend on whether the company’s potentially ground-breaking ReZorce product is a commercial success. ReZorce is intended to be a recyclable replacement for liquid paperboard (e.g. Tetra Pak) in food and beverage cartons.

AD_4nXe81V4jb8QCdaTrHbxWFJ7N1sK25UUEhadkUBJlkBDcqou-Yq7gJ9WP7OkTYW3W1FQhizySJzh5oxPDRpDVyTnu2DwF-qOWxgMgUw1gg0QSY120KO7Ch1euivPYAyfKS79zQTaSxt-qXZiGblnQu4KxP3M?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

Recent newsflow looks promising to me, with a large trial underway. But commercial adoption could still take a while and may face unforeseen obstacles.

In the meantime, current profits do depend quite heavily on the firm’s Nike (NYQ:NKE) contract.

The sportswear giant’s flagging sales (Q3 sales fell by 10%) leave me wondering about Zotefoam’s near-term growth prospects. Brokers are bullish, however, so the shares might still be attractive on a longer-term view than mine.

AD_4nXfoEY7LHHrcvDOJJHYJJH32KNbQk1vQ4HE_8Y-RtRrm3cN6lnMMQ-oSe2hcLmzIbNlAuqIVNbDXplbq6QUKmcEarKnEnWciV3vJz1Sug8VzYsp_G_qd7jmNT6FvLd-zR6YXwTasjQLjMrJW_Jfw6CjmmklZ?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

I’ll continue to watch Zotefoam’s progress with interest.

Bought: 284p on 26 October 23

Sold: 467p 30 July 24

Total return (inc. dividends & costs): +66%

Vesuvius (LON:VSVS)

I added this FTSE 250-listed metal flow engineering specialist to SIF in June, but had sold by early August. My decision was made after I decided (along with the wider market) that the evasively-worded outlook statement in the half-year results was really a profit warning.

Stockopedia’s research has found that it often pays to sell quickly after a profit warning. Sure enough, Vesuvius’s share price has continued to drift lower:

AD_4nXcahczwRBa4kw0E6cTf_SHu2qpDUbnTPXvcgaepTP0Kb_ZN1TjAGv3MJpa7dwe11iRnTJgRnAvBKDwyGAOuCy4LMMkwWo4yW9ei2STJq4F8R4Yn5gL7xWTN0GSiEcIN17AZg-Naa3AEz_n72vLmGZxz_d8q?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

Broker consensus estimates have also been falling steadily:

AD_4nXflna7ZUy_IM40OEZwkwNyVQeEvTstmu7SZ6fQtHmqhankm4oB4tLoGmE-vf0fHTizbYhGzBGuMwVO-U6fKHhIHyUq6quDPJEElhjVag5c7RtN7oD_Y_xaROjw_VuOFRh5EhrkZVpY3LBPILVN6jCPRVY3G?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

I think Vesuvius remains a leading player in its sector, but I have no idea about the near-term outlook for the business.

Bought: 462p on 28 June 24

Sold: 410p on 6 August 24

Total return (inc. dividends & costs): -12%

PayPoint (LON:PAY)

I have followed this payments business intermittently for a number of years and had previously owned the stock, so I’ve been interested to see signs of momentum and real growth returning to this small cap.

In my view, the main difficulty for anyone analysing the business is the sheer number of moving parts. I find it hard to be sure of the precise profit contribution made by each element of the business.

However, this has always been a cash-generative and high margin business, and remains so today, as far as I can see.

AD_4nXe1SK1CBwD6hcUAEX8Z601vBnp6uXo7JUOujw9KLUOE7voXt-3pG6YKUpFKFk7pKAobqRCW0MmAD2jGwfsHmwkG_AfBhSWOoHpikxY3pWqyyx7-yjkVvvaWYoR2dinvUFlPknElSllDCr7Uzn5Pq4nLuwM1?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

With profits expected to continue rising, the stock’s sub-10 forecast P/E and generous yield still look tempting to me:

AD_4nXf4Hwsqx_M1jYiCaVgBoGiK1bG0JkGNwO5JsDnXqbA2D4HVm2HpAESBj3NcBvYMNmHU_yuHpYjxOsyA5CAirU1i5qJ9HUjUNr-AfZWyNUp3eSiESkinCND2jYmTK3lBGWsz0E-pbc0Iirf3Eoy8YR0RPBU?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

Although it doesn’t quite qualify for my screen, I think PayPoint is probably still worth a closer look.

Bought: 561p on 14 November 23

Sold: 703p on 27 August 24

Total return (inc. dividends & costs): +30%

Centamin (LON:CEY)

Egyptian gold miner Centamin only has one producing asset, the Sukari mine, but it’s a good asset that’s generated a lot of surplus cash for shareholders over the years.

Against a backdrop of record gold prices, South African sector heavyweight AngloGold Ashanti has now decided it would like to consolidate Sukari into its portfolio of mines.

The South African firm recently made a 163p offer for Centamin shares, valuing the business at c.£1.9bn.

AD_4nXfSBLstiRdEXQnUxfsWZUJLpjm0rGYPHnctKJgJik7Dn2mnqqhSw3KwPPF7RiQN9Sl7UROqVFWcnPyFG3TMX6YhHCORyuB6aITerBFPrKIcumT1WyAri06BPnT00_kakyABVZ0sWY7WIaNfgdc5n14j2bM?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

I expect the takeover to complete, so I opted to sell the shares for 155p in late September, generating a respectable 75% total return.

Bought: 91p on 8 August 23

Sold: 155p on 24 September 24

Total return (inc. dividends & costs): +75%

Ocean Wilsons Holdings (LON:OCN)

This quirky, family-controlled group owns a stake in a Brazilian shipping services group Wilson Sons, alongside a somewhat complex $300m+ investment portfolio.

It’s been a perennial value stock, often trading below book value with an attractive dividend yield. For me, the attractive part of the business is Wilson Sons, due to its hard-to-replace infrastructure assets and established market share.

Ironically, it’s the possible disposal of the Wilson Sons business that’s provided a catalyst for the shares over the last year:

AD_4nXc1gPGanfDt1dtjR2K7pKZq8dRLA6eAXNAWbGFGhiwDzPJTtkGgWmC0zkOyC_Tji1fRB0Yl62rS5Kd_x2rtg7S-NbpLgCPlqWm6ULfODcv5Kh9A_Odqh9Gd0YStB8XJWA--uK4mU3g62ZQMc0CzQ0GFRnFE?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

Ocean Wilson’s recent results highlighted a strong showing from the Wilson Sons business and a slightly less impressive performance on the investment side.

However, the shares now trade comfortably above net asset value and the dividend yield has dropped below 5%. Earnings forecasts have also flattened out.

AD_4nXfk_cYj3ERQMKeSUtJMFKjGG_D_cXNA9pDsy23ihbVQgmwTOhFPhVL8m36OH2pS00FMIr_XUccPEMr6a-Z3gS3VCXEP4vmfkBkQ--P7DlvjZ4x4Wfo2yuJjElgiwxHo2lE1EAPlK7D2Lrby5PEX7hNYFuiM?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

I think the shares are probably still quite affordably priced, but they’re certainly not as cheap as they were when I added them to SIF at the end of 2023.

The strategic review is still ongoing and there’s not yet any decision on whether the company will sell the Wilson Sons business. As SIF is not a long-term portfolio, I’m happy to have closed the trade at a comfortable profit and moved on.

Bought: 1,095p on 6 December 23

Sold: 1,360p on 24 September 24

Total return (inc. dividends & costs): +30%

Airtel Africa (LON:AAF)

This African mobile group is one of the largest operators on the continent, rivalling Vodafone’s African operations in scale. Unlike Vodafone, Airtel Africa has also consistently generated high margins and attractive returns on capital employed.

AD_4nXfF7qrew-B87XEIITn4Jr0HhDmmOfAAw39H9kiJ5m4mn0ayQUdBzPDm-tNw0ckOG1Re_uuCEIENUKAXnHfOL_5qXyGddX0kmjxnPYWaNUTwwlJleU0ekyn6evVHLO3hF9sfOLOiTk38TcmFT8VHVRNaxQXx?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

However, the group’s finances and geographical exposure aren’t without risk, in my view, and net debt levels remain material at c.$3bn.

Some risks were highlighted by last year’s results. Airtel Africa’s mobile services revenue rose by 19.4% in constant currency terms last year, but the group’s reported revenue fell by 5%.

This was largely due to the group’s exposure to the devaluations of the Nigerian Naira and Malawian Kwacha last year.

These currency crashes resulted in Airtel suffering derivative and foreign exchange losses of $807m for the year ended 31 March 2024, leading to a full-year net loss of $165m.

AD_4nXeq1ldgm64lazqYrHG6lRJKtIKKUl1GY38pur5EdQbINJQxz2gzWmNIL4ZJymuNOAiyD0CCI37yc7Zvmdee7RJX47pv0NQ5BwbX3N68iS6YgVxbjErBlBSWab6k8Zyz1oTZeC2rZI8LAHlKUYxnjIgXFB22?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

Fortunately, the underlying business has always been cash generative since its 2019 listing on the London market. The shares still support a dividend yield of nearly 4%.

On balance, I think this could be an interesting business to research for investors who want exposure to Africa and are comfortable with the founding Bharti family’s controlling shareholding:

AD_4nXc5YHmc2pxuti30xR4LZSFAJf8gJj98_jMmh8C2ky5dy29EBfugw8MnTexJgW8jYDE_IGsABVZ2fjFxVBIR_pTFobA8qtdQLLLwD_SvqmiGRcKPYg1gZ5InB9HKLDCGvcBBoynIjGQdyyhw50wkgJBT51E?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

SIF’s Airtel Africa position closed broadly at breakeven. Given the downward drift in earnings forecasts, I’m not too unhappy with this outcome:

AD_4nXeTFN7XQNoQVmYQ1zRF3iOSBEmVE4jRiSiGCQ3uALDAxIms5bsvUdOJgYQv1M_Xu62l1Our6yDrdTeK-PIhNJcwOOdCkZu64aQ706T0D5bkP-bKwQXgz4W86NMJ8MLNC7Ip-4xb2iy-9Kb9zUHODUf5vImb?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

Bought: 122p on 18 December 23

Sold: 119p on 24 September 24

Total return (inc. dividends & costs): -1%

Note: You can see a spreadsheet showing all completed SIF trades since inception here. E&OE.

New stocks added in Q3

I added the following companies to SIF over the last three months, selecting from shares that qualified for my buying screen.

Card Factory (LON:CARD)

The high street greeting card retailer has been covered extensively in the SCVR and was one of SIF’s top performers – until recently…

AD_4nXdrMHw6QSYcD2yl-p_KQ_TwbCH_a8YckzubQ4VO2YAxt3-_huubC7rlgjOt7pg3qUb1WPmTfQ_eDCDyyb-GOtoiiCE3xyEBDOOB5XlAq-wZOpBMevnT1i7Afi_2J7OAl0r198LC-kUTbCjRI5XTNOZRA65U?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

The firm’s recent half-year results warned of a second-half weighting but left full-year expectations unchanged. Paul discussed the numbers here.

SIF’s position has dropped to a loss, but I’ve continued to hold the shares as they haven’t (yet) triggered either of my rules for an immediate sale – a profit warning or a 25% drawdown.

Unchanged consensus forecasts confirm that Card Factory’s brokers have left full-year estimates unchanged and have not slipped a profit warning through the back door:

AD_4nXduBPAif7C4Zyyr8guessPTIto6DeszLJlc5dcmLG6bL4DENC9VALKVPoXi7XVHhIt-rfFon4rREnw_huLf6uMQnAJLFAzOwboNEDG0oZim5CX501RP0j783SGvf0hJBR8LyDaQ7U1nb7Rgirm6qHknFaPp?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

I added CARD to SIF at 110p on 23 July 24.

Frp Advisory (LON:FRP)

This small cap business advisory group specialises in insolvency. It’s performed well since IPO in 2020:

AD_4nXdchwhtbWh0i-kTGfo0Cc9R-nDNYF7gYeTALMHmnBK3Aku2vi3ldtkBZCwCOhZVsyKYxAd7jObAY0NNgyMQLLzl1gbZjy48WqoxRCobSqH_IDTLDEON975doyMyHPDqG8BvA1nMn0vWlb7Vxv7f0LDAVqky?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

Last year’s results were ahead of original expectations and the company’s brokers have pushed through a steady stream of earnings upgrades over the last year:

AD_4nXcdUgAyRT8u8VoJLytdYX7xEZymick-Zs6Dd3KDatmGWjUmePRN0Iwnr9UWupjBI0TCUv2XcWCN3ztf-yM9ZrbwKJkNHbI_CGQL4pqkn8CJiYuWwCBSdnNNqRfNNDZap9j3cng9JnhN9lQKD5WPvRMdbLQX?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

The stock still doesn’t look too expensive to me, for a business with a net cash balance sheet that’s generating 30% returns on equity:

AD_4nXdjtF4l4puBgfe_IdhmqVxmDSapzVTw-d8fFCz96KiI7qMAjqQU-YGm4m9wBhBsIy8LHqkaSUn0R0w3Ds8i8lMQLjQvzmyqwb4qT4ykPG7vPwxSUaIsnalr1EKVrI12EVxYevbDnaR3FbB7HRCODZf-6ys4?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

However, as always with this type of consultancy business, it’s worth remembering that key assets walk out the door every night, and acquisitions can sometimes misfire.

More generally, I don’t have any feel of the near-term outlook for this business, beyond a vague recent AGM statement:

The short and medium-term outlook for our business remains positive and we are confident of continued progress.

I added FRP to SIF at 134p on 6 August 24.

Epwin (LON:EPWN)

Epwin produces UPVC windows, doors and building products such as fascias.

Housing market conditions are relatively depressed at the moment, but the company’s trading has remained relatively strong in my view and its valuation still seems reasonable to me, at less than 10 times forecast earnings.

AD_4nXeFGhFgGFMWOG5iMOyaRM25YjNeGqXEhqD3Z9LqRtyTdKi3YP59WaDex3BawbmkSVLoysBPtMMpQ3r7hps2aYToz2qLV3tuRdjRbgT-lAjJFHB3Q5PycioK460V1DuGTFAuD7KaxCg8WXR5uahyc6-O2W6p?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

Importantly, Epwin’s balance sheet seems to have remained in relatively decent health over the last couple of years.

Balance sheet strength is a priority for me at this point in the cycle. Sound finances provide some protection against permanent equity losses and should support stronger returns for shareholders when market conditions do improve.

As with all my SIF purchases, Epwin was selected from the results of my buying screen. But I do also see this sector as a possible UK macro play at the moment – a theme I discussed recently here.

Time will tell how well this turns out!

I added EPWN to SIF at 85p on 13 August 24

Morgan Advanced Materials (LON:MGAM)

I only added shares in this FTSE 250 materials specialist to SIF in late August, but I’m unsure as to whether I should perhaps have sold them already under my profit warning rule, which stipulates an immediate sale if guidance is cut.

My confusion is due to a vague outlook statement in August’s half-year results.

We are cautious on demand in a number of our end-markets and now expect revenue in our second half to be in line with that in our first half. Nevertheless, we are well-positioned with our market leading differentiated positions and expect constant-currency* full-year revenue growth to continue to be towards the top end of our financial framework at 4-7%.

The company also said that full-year margins are expected to be in line with previous guidance. However, management chose not to explicitly confirm whether full-year earnings are still expected to be in line with expectations. This seems slightly evasive to me.

I don’t have access to any broker notes here, so I am left guessing. But I think there could be some read across from Vesuvius (see above) and I can see that broker consensus has edged lower since the start of August:

AD_4nXenvgqlsM9Aux8bUqgVGbtq9IY7wWZnSPjY6_qOWJc9guKgSTgqwDk8sLu4gn0darBEMN6sBJNUTEmjRfd8vVIkaoiVyoV3a2h-a859eTgzZj375bDA28tiwex_dQNzaDbqopXiYA8D7EqMq62mbF8IUJKJ?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

SIF’s holding in Morgan Advanced Materials is now sitting at a double-digit loss, as the share price has dropped c.14% since my purchase.

The company normally issues a trading update in early November, so I may review the situation at that time.

I added MGAM to SIF at 310p on 20 August 24.

Hilton Food (LON:HFG)

This food production group describes itself as a multi-protein producer. Its core business is in meat production, while seafood is of growing importance.

Hilton Food was a reliable performer for investors for many years, but suffered a profit setback in 2022, since when profits have been rebuilding.

AD_4nXdGbYLnaGXMkcdyD_eTmEioXyuyXe3bGMFLNMU7xzsQPuZLrabhJlerm7zwApqDnJvhiukfZAIU-HOFNaFn4eb-TAfGxpQFPeRrOHlqJ7UhFg18VL6Gw8m-GjdCnLOkmAPEKGorhUibohlEL66oTIaCggYi?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

Bears will point to Hilton Food’s structurally low margins and dependence on large trade buyers, such as supermarkets.

I can’t argue with these risks, but I would also point out that the business is currently quite cash generative and has a track record of generating double-digit returns on capital employed (far higher than most supermarkets).

AD_4nXffAxlQB4L20KzkQaHl9sO6tQopmfCDXgYB16AnuRObeWaFwFHCfkHwyP4adohFvLq_km8s7YB0B_iiUtRApNRCcMSyrqxpQ5QDytMzYtIE1qtcv7A6d0lJFAubwwEaeIKl09Agl2kxNDBONFNROqme1sX6?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

In my view, these shares could still offer decent value at current levels if trading remains on track. Stockopedia’s algorithms also have a fairly positive view, at present:

AD_4nXe2kk_tCHYidNZGeLPkmFwWjsmWeyHNgWiKEZ8WovDGW4kCJZVpMWTapFytnYzhvR0sIu1ZiC9sUqzY1sC3I5KhyA67ejbDs1P73XbUW_O62coPsKlllP72XLKE3tjnlaSe0c30XpaQqJNHWDmZN1m1pDY8?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w

I added HFG to SIF at 891p on 11 September 24.

Cash weighting/position sizing

In H1 I wondered if I’d overcommitted by cutting the target number of holdings for SIF from 20 to 16 (with a proportionate increase in position size).

I contemplated reversing this decision in Q3, but I have decided not to do so, at least for the time being.

The level of cash in the portfolio increased from 14% at the end of H1 to 27% at the end of September. I will leave things unchanged in Q4 and see how the picture looks at the end of the year.

AD_4nXfosan_dVk2eJI_iMk2i9oYLR--1juUytNB0O7P1LDcXRhrd0UpgU1WGob5QkhSwYPked932uR8P6DrWuybc9cty9tTBGw9tIrdaIYLWn68FmAYVH7zc7HxLAiyUUEAKQDou9aPokjXP2dNWoA0yahUsi5y?key=IBEiOhfmUoavhXhcFwGM3w


Final thoughts

We’re heading into what could be an uncertain final quarter of the year. However, SIF is essentially fully invested, and my screen is continuing to find plenty of affordable growth opportunities.

Poor investor sentiment towards UK equities, especially small caps and AIM stocks, may help to explain the value I can see in the market, reflected in my screen results.

However, the growth side of my rule set still requires a positive outlook for sales and earnings in order for a stock to qualify as a possible buy.

My guess is that the next few months could see an increase in volatility. However, on a longer-term view, I think there are still some attractive opportunities in today’s market.

I’ll be back at the start of 2025 with a review of Q4 and a round-up of SIF’s performance over the whole of 2024.

In the meantime, please let me know what you think, as always, in the comments below!

Disclosure: Roland owned all shares listed in the SIF folio at the time of publication.

Disclaimer

This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

11 comments


Avatar for Velo

Hi Roland,

As always, fascinating content in your updates. Well done on the continuing returns and success from the SIF screens.

Hope I’m not too late in asking you a couple of queries on the ‘enabled/disabled’ SIF screening metrics. Over the years I have collected a couple of your screens and saved 4 of them in my screen lists ie., Currently -

SIF BUY SCREEN

SIF HOLD SCREEN

SIF RELAXED SCREEN

SIF SELL SCREEN.

When accessed they display the same stocks, as clicking your latest updates where you’ve highlighted: “click here” when referring to buy and sell screens. So all good. 

However, I noticed on your ‘click here’ links within your update that some of them have a couple of your chosen metrics unticked, thus displaying ‘disabled’ when hovering over them.

For instance there are two disabled metrics in the SIFF Buy screen:

- Index includes FTSE250 has been disabled/unticked

And -

- Net Debt has been disabled/unticked too.

When I open my saved SIF Buy screen it displays the same 16 selections as your latest links to the linked screener in your update - So all good.

However, thinking I must have meddled once too often with the settings I ticked ‘INDEX includes FTSE250’ and suddenly the screen now only displays 9 stocks.

- Then I also enabled the ‘Net Debt’ metric with a tick, and the screen reduced the selection yet again, down to 6 stocks.

Does that mean you have left those two metrics disabled to garner a higher amount of selections,and perhaps only enable them in say, a bear market?

(Apologies if perhaps you’ve touched on them in previous updates, that I’ve maybe missed?) 

PS. Can’t count the number of times I’ve been fortunate to have the odd well performing stock (and sold too soon) - ONLY to discover they are still performing well in the latest SIF screen! The latest being  Cairn Homes (LON:CRN)

- So taking more notice of the SIF screens for the commencement of my next new folio build, to commence closer to this month-end.

Regards,

4
Avatar for Roland Head

Hi Velo,

Many thanks for your comment. In answer to your questions:

Net debt rule: I stopped using the net debt rule several years ago now. This was mostly due to the impact of IFRS 16 rules (2019/20 onwards) that include lease obligations in statutory net debt, but also to various other anomalies that can affect this comparison with profits. 

I find it more appropriate to check borrowings manually when considering a company, but my broad rule of thumb that net financial debt (ex leases) should be less than four times net profit remains unchanged.

I should have deleted this rule from the screen when I decided to stop using it - I have now done so.

FTSE 250: I can't find a FTSE 250 rule in any of my current live screens, so I'm not sure how this has come about. I don't remember including it at any point in the past either, as the SIF approach has always been an all-cap approach with only a minimum (£50m) size limit.

SIF Hold screen - I am not 100% certain, but I think this was a previous name for the SIF Sell screen (see below). 

Screen list: for clarity, the screens I use are:

- SIF Buy screen - this is the original screen I use to select stocks to buy for SIF. It has been largely unchanged since 2016

- Stock in Focus screen (relaxed) - this is a modified version of the buy screen with less demanding valuation metrics. I use it during extended dry spells  - i.e. typically during strong growth markets. I haven't used it for quite a while!

- SIF Sell screen - this is the screen I use to consider whether to sell after the standard nine month holding period.  To remain in the portfolio for a further month,, a share must pass all of these test and appear in the screen's results.

I hope this helps to clear up any confusion. Let me know in the comments if you have any other questions.

Finally, I should point out that these screens are not intended as recommendations or any kind of advice to trade in stocks. Please DYOR! 

Regards,

Roland

7
Avatar for Velo

Hi Roland,

Thanks for replying.

When accessing the SELL screen in your reply, it actually comes up on screen titled instead as: Stock In Focus Screen (Relaxed) - and displays 25 stocks.

The designated ‘Relaxed’ screen in your reply actually displays 55 stocks.

Went back into the Q3 SIF update article, and clicked the Sell link within the body of the text, and it lists the Sell screen there with 55 stocks showing.

So is the Sell screen link in your reply correct, and simply mis-titled when it opens, or an error?

- - - - - - -

Think I recall messing about experimenting with the FTSE250 Index. So that issue may well have been my self-imposed error.

Dumped the old Hold screen - then found another screen I’ve failed to monitor, called SIF International. Left that as is, though :)

Regards

4
Avatar for Roland Head

Sorry Velo, it looks like my copy and paste efforts went rogue.

The correct links are: 

Stock in Focus Screen (relaxed) 

and 

SELL - Stock in Focus (SIF)

The relaxed screen has easier valuation criteria but is otherwise the same. I use it when the main buy screen has not provided any opportunities for at least four weeks (e.g. during strong bull markets).

The number of stocks you mention for each screen sounds about right at the moment.

The international screen is a discontinued effort - I did try running a version of SIF with international stocks for a while, but it didn't seem to work very well and wasn't as popular, so I decided to focus on the UK.

Roland

6
Avatar for Velo

Thanks for the clarification Roland.

Had to be sure my personal preferences/ prejudices weren't the  direct cause as for instance I had increased the F-Score from 4 to 5 on the Sell screen as I've never had much luck with F-Score 4 stocks, so 6 is my preferred all purpose minimum rating. 

Love the sheer number of S/Ranked 90+ stocks that show up on this methodology, without the need to insert a rule to select only S/R 90+ stocks.

2
Avatar for PastPerformance

Hi Roland,

Congratulations on your results to date, and thank for the excellent concise commentary.  One question I have is whether the selections are fully ‘automated’  based on your screen results, or is there still an element of ‘selection’ / manual filtering from the screen results?  I ask because you mention somewhere selecting from the screener. 

I also agree with your comments on momentum.  I like both value and growth, but find anecdotally that both perform best where the momentum backdrop is favourable.
thx

Jonny

5
Avatar for Roland Head

Hi Jonny,

Thanks for commenting. It's probably fair to say that my selections are semi-automated, rather than fully automated.

In short, the process I use is to sort the screen results by StockRank and then scan down the list, looking for a suitable buy.

In doing this I will manually filter out any obvious sector duplicates of existing SIF shares (e.g. I would not have two oil producers).

I'll also filter out most overseas-based or dual-listed companies, although I'll sometimes make an exception for US or Irish stocks.

Beyond this, I don't apply too much discretion. I regularly add stocks I would not choose to buy. For example,  I am not a fan of outsourcers but do currently hold Serco (LON:SRP).

I don't do any in-depth research prior to making a decision, but I do take a quick look at the StockReport and consider my existing knowledge (if any) of a company before buying. 

Excess debt might cause me to pass on a stock, as would a special situation that doesn't show up in the numbers, such as the company being involved in a major acquisition or takeover. 

In general, I only want to buy middle-of-the-road companies that are operating normally.

However, the point of the system is to overcome prejudice and bias and select stocks consistently, based on fundamentals and QVM factors alone. For me, it's important to stay close to this and I think I do, on the whole.

I hope this is some help!

Roland

9
Avatar for The Ox 2906

Very interesting and good to see your methods and hear your thinking. It’s not the buying and selling it’s the sitting which makes the money, to loosely paraphrase Charlie Munger!

13
Avatar for Howard Adams

Hi Roland

An interesting read as usual. Thank you for doing it. Congratulations on such a steady and highly acceptable annualised gain from the inception.

I would be interested to hear from you as to which of your rules (or processes) do you feel might have played a strong part in your positive performance, and which might have been weaker contributors.

Obviously you embedded these type of thoughts into your design before implementation, but have any turned out to be quite surprising to you?

Regards

Howard

11
Avatar for Roland Head

Hi Howard,

Thank you for your kind words. 

You ask an interesting question. What I would say is that one reason for the portfolio's relative success is simply that I've followed a consistent process and resisted the temptation to deviate from this or chase short-term trends. 

What this has meant (I think) is that when conditions have been right for this strategy, I've done well. When conditions have been poor and few stocks have qualified for my screen, the downside has been limited by my willingness to hold more cash and wait for opportunities to return. 

In terms of which rules have had the most impact, I think it's hard to separate the different factors and attribute success to them individually. 

However, when I think about the stocks that have delivered the best returns (e.g. c.50% and above), I would say that in general it's the combination of strong value and momentum that has delivered these relatively quick gains.

As a value investor by nature it pains me to say this, but where growth/momentum has failed to deliver, a cheap valuation has often made no difference during the relatively short periods I hold in SIF. 

In addition, what's probably surprised me the most is probably the way in which momentum can drive strong price gains in relatively short periods. I have probably underestimated this in the past.

Of course, past performance is no guarantee of future returns. 

Now that interest rates and the cost of capital have risen significantly, I think we could be entering a slightly different period for the markets. Company boards may decide to allocate capital differently and this could have an as-yet unknown knock-on effect on  investment returns.

I don't know whether my rules will continue to work as well as they have done. But I'm looking forward to finding out!

Regards,

Roland

18
Avatar for Howard Adams

Hi Roland

Thanks for a thoughtful response. As I have read your pieces from the outset, I also think that your dedication to follow a systematic process has paid off.  But what I applaud you for are your initial rules set. Without your intelligent selection of those I am not sure you would have achieved the results you have. 

I look forward to others to comment on the thread and see what they have to say.

Regards

Howard

9
Get the free newsletter