Small Cap Value Report (1 Dec 2014) - PRV, ACSO, BON

1st Dec '14 by Paul Scott

6 comments 18928 reads

Good evening. I'm back from Vegas now, but the overnight flight meant that I was too jet-lagged to be able to write a coherent report earlier today. We don't want any gaps in the series, so I'm catching up this evening having had a long afternoon nap!

Oil

I'm always looking for bargains, and it strikes me that the extraordinary collapse in the price of oil might be starting to throw up some buying opportunities? So I'll be suspending my usual rule of not looking at any resource stocks, and might consider the odd one - but only if the investing case is compelling, and low risk - so producers, with cash on the Balance Sheet, will be my starting point. One has to assume that most of the cash-strapped junior explorers are not worth even glancing at.

Lower energy costs will certainly help in particular the US consumer, as they are heavy users of oil for heating & in vehicles, which is taxed lightly compared with Europe - so the benefit of the big drop in oil price is already putting more disposable income into consumer pockets in the US. I might start looking at some US stocks when time permits. Amongst all those thousands of stocks, there must be some undiscovered bargain small caps!

Historically the US economy has always boomed on the back of cheap energy, so it probably will do again. Maybe the apparently expensive US stock market isn't so wildly priced, given the upside on economic growth, on what is still the world's biggest & most entrepreneurial economy?

I did some reading on holiday, and one phrase which stuck in my mind from some investing guru (can't remember which) is that when a share, or a market as a whole, breaks into new highs, then you have to stop and consider that something significant has changed - and that betting against such a move could prove a mistake. On the other hand this is something like the 3rd longest bull market in history, so it must be nearer the end than the beginning?

So lots to ponder. I'm mainly a bottom up stock picker, but it also makes sense to monitor big macroeconomic themes & trends, and at least have a rough idea of where we are in the business cycle, and invest accordingly.

Porvair (LON:PRV)

Share price:…

Unlock with Email

Unlock with Google

Already have an account?
Login here

Mrx9000

2nd Dec '14

What do you make of the C21 statement this morning Paul?

pammiekins

Paul - agree not many small oil companies fitting your bill - however Amerisur is one:

(ref.SharesMagazine)
Amerisur is active in Colombia and Paraguay where it has substantial proven reserves and also a large amount of exploration upside with varying degrees of risk and reward. In Colombia it has 1P reserves of 19.8mmbo and 2P of 32.8mmbo, with net mean resources of 235mmbo from unrisked management estimates. It would not be wrong to say that the Platanillo field is the gift that keeps on giving as the company has drilled and completed 14 new wells and 3 sidetracks in the last 27 months, all being successful. In addition to that there is an ongoing drilling campaign on Platanillo with success in the U and T sands possibly to be followed by the B and N sands where oil has already been tested and I expect the latter, a proven stratigraphic trap to add to the reserves this year. With the PUT-12 block directly to the east of Platanillo being of the same geology but five times the size of it, the company are suggesting that mapping currently indicates 200-480 mmbo of potential resource, again net unrisked management estimates. Amerisur also has a 100% WI in the Fenix block in the Middle Magdalena Basin to the North of Colombia. In Paraguay there is massive, possibly transformational potential with an extensive acreage position comprising two E&P and three Prospecting permits. You will know that I am very excited about Paraguay with my work on President , this is equally as game-changing as that may be for them.
First half of 2014 production was 6,561 bopd which is growing but limited by ‘transportation options’, effectively the company trucks crude to market through Orito,Colombia which incurs a very significant cost per barrel, now the opportunity has arisen to connect directly to the Ecuadorian pipeline system. The company can put 4,000 b/d though the link at Victor Hugo Ruales, a number that will increase significantly after a facility upgrade to over 50,000 b/d. The effect that this will have on costs for Amerisur are significant, for over 85% of the 2015 production the cost per barrel will fall from $23 to $6, a massive opportunity and the company expect to have the interconnector operating on schedule by the end of 2014.
Amerisur is in a strong position financially, first half revenues this year were $114m ($64m ‘1H 13) with cash of $96m at the moment. By international oil company standards it has a fairly modest G&A and all exploration and development is funded from cash flow and resources. The company appears to have the full hand of exploration and development with low risk reserve extensions, significant short term upside in producing acreage plus prospects in Put-12, Put-30 and in Paraguay any of which could be game changers. The forward programme is packed with a mixture of development and exploration wells, including the San Pedro well in Paraguay and of course the pipeline into Ecuador which transforms already exciting economics.
With a first class management, supportive shareholders and a portfolio that contains low, medium and high risk prospects, when the pipeline comes onstream it will be like having another discovery. For all these reasons Amerisur should be at the top of the list of stocks to own, it has always been reassuringly expensive so the recent market shake out may prove to be an opportunity not to be missed.

And, how about Iomart for starters ? Not an oily but well run company with previous 2 bidders rejected. Possibly room for a third attempt before EOY results.

kenobi

what about SOCO international ? (oil co )cash producer, divi payer, possible reserves update coming up over the next few months, and senior management looking to sell the assets at the correct point,

yearly high over 450, obviously price of oil will hit the income, other assets in africa have shown some potential, (eni's discovery in Congo seems to overlap onto soco's block , awaiting confirmation ).
have done some exploration in the virunga park which is bad pr, but if they find anything and can do a deal with unesco to redraw the boundaries of the park, could turn into something.

cheers K

K

Camtab

Paul,
As you know I have previously posted on your view to the macro economy and its impact on beta. Thanks for your comment above as it helps me treaty with understanding how you approach your investment.
With regards to SIA or SOCO Kenobi, I am a holder although I have been reducing. In the old sense I think it is a real opportunity, I won't go through the Stockopedia info, you can do that yourself. However and this is a big BUT, I really do think there is a change going on with regard to capitalism (I am a capitalist and I love making money), people are expecting to see a more social capitalism at the top level. If reports are to be believed SOCO has shown scant regard for the environment in Virunga, (see Leonardo Di Caprios film) and Hollywood can make heart rending films!! So my concern is that SOCO could start to take on an environmental discount (I know lobbyists are talking to pension schemes). My problem is I don't know how to estimate that discount and therefore valuation becomes more difficult. Also there is no clarity on whether they will be able to get the oil out of the Congo given the headwind. I hope this is helpful.

Camtab, I agree, I think the Virunga issue does hang over soco somewhat, but I'm afraid I don't buy into the oh aren't soco such a terrible company. It's not soco's decision to look for oil it's the democratically elected governments decision. People having a go at soco for looking for oil is akin to people protesting against the builders who put up my extension because they object to where I'm building it. If they pulled out (as if ), I would get another contractor. There is no reason on earth that exploration cannot go hand in hand with development of the park in the way the wwf want. Infact some could share the infrastructure (communications, hospitals, roads). It might even be that there is oil there that is better extracted from the other side of the boarder in Uganda, and that by just proving it crosses over the government may be entitled to some revenues. There is a lot of nonsense talked about the whole virunga thing, and while I have my doubts about it, I'm not happy to see blatant misinformation spread about mountain gorillas and the like.
The rare mountain gorillas are 50 miles away, outside the block, in an area soco have said they'd never explore, (not least because it's a mountain I imagine).
But if you have real concerns about how it could effect the price, consider this, there are 4 outcomes
1) siesmic shows nothing worth the hassle, soco walks away,
2) siesmic shows potential soco tries to do a deal with the government and unesco,
a) no deal possible , soco walks away,
b) deal possible, explore it comes to nothing, walk away,
c) deal possible, explore , find oil,

only 2b/c have the virunga thing going on for any length of time, I don't know how long a campaign might take to organise and do, but if that came to nothing, it could well be over in the next 18 months, add 6 months trying to agree a deal with unesco re expo plans suggests in 2 years, it'd be over. the only long term virunga issue is if they find oil, now if they do, they'll have done it by doing a deal with unesco to redraw the boundaries of the park, as has been done in the past in other parks. Probably with a deal to put things back in 10 years time when they've finished, and perhaps returning the area back to national park then. Probably in the meantime a few $ per barrel extracted will be put in a fund to develop the park. Will this be such a bad thing for the park long term ? I suspect not.
option 1 or 2 a seem the most likely to me, so it's probably all over in 6 months to a year, if we get into the other options we've done it with agreement with unesco, so they will have approved the plans. It'll be harder to object then surely ??
And anna fiel, can make videos from a leafy uganda talking about this place as if she were in virunga, but the truth is that while some of virunga is while, it has a population of over a million people , mostly very poor , and isn't all the virgin forest that we see in the videos.
The congo is just virgin acreage, like other areas they've given up having found nothing.

Personally I am more worried about the medium/long term price of oil than virunga.

K

Small Cap Value Report (1 Dec 2014) - PRV, ACSO, BON

Oil

Porvair (LON:PRV)

Unlock the rest of this article with a 14 day trial

About the Author

Paul Scott

6 comments

Unlock the metrics for all these stocks and more...

Unlock the metrics for all these stocks and more...