21
Archived articleThis is an archived article from 2013 - please note that any content within the article may be out of date.

Small Cap Value Report (1 Nov) - PURI, ESCH, INVU, MDM, OMIP

Good morning! Very little news today, which is handy as my mouse hand has turned into something resembling a claw, so a 2-day rest from using the computer is badly needed!

Director buying & selling of shares is not something I mention very often here. Broadly speaking I tend to ignore small Director buying & selling. Small, orchestrated buying of shares by several Directors at the same time is actually a bearish sign in my opinion - as it is usually little more than a cynical attempt to prop up a falling share price.

The Director transactions I really focus on are large ones - regulars will remember that I was bearish on Cupid (LON:CUP)  when it started to fall heavily, one of the reasons being the huge Directors selling of shares, which was an obvious warning sign that all was not well. On the other hand, a Director selling a medium number of shares, but retaining the majority of their holding, is usually acceptable, providing there is up-to-date evidence of positive trading. However, it is a warning sign, being a reminder that the valuation might be getting high, and/or that there might be trading headwinds approaching.

The flipside of this is that when I see big Director buying, I really sit up and take notice. That's one of the biggest bull signals you can get. What is big? Well, certainly into £6-figures is a Director sending out a serious buy signal. That has just happened at a share where I hold, PuriCore (LON:PURI). A Non-Exec there, Daniel Hegglin, has just bought a million shares at 45p, so a £450k vote of confidence. That takes his holding up to 4.9m shares, 9.79% of the company, so he is clearly a wealthy man, and wealthy people are usually pretty shrewd, so I am encouraged by this signal, and might follow suit and top up my position.

 

 

 

 

We're looking at a fairly strong start, with the FTSE 100 Futures up 28 points at 6,758. How long can this carry on, is the question on everyone's lips. The consensus seems to be that for as long as near-zero interest rates continue, then shares remain an attractive asset class. It's very hard to find value in smaller caps now, although there are still several dozen small caps that do fit my value criteria, but that number is shrinking gradually as they are re-rated. However, oppotunities continue to pop up, from positive trading statements, broker upgrades, etc. However I don't think there is any general opportunity in the market as a whole any more, so very much a stock-pickers market. If anything it's (selectively) some larger caps where opportunities might now lie. It is striking that both BP and Shell offer well-covered dividend yields of around 5% for example.

The key aspect of my strategy is to be prepared for a downturn. I cannot remember such a sustained period of bullishness since the late 1990s as we've seen in the last 18 months (for small to mid caps anyway), and of course that all ended in tears. Although casting my mind back, the people who suffered the most in the bear market of 2000-2002 were people who had overpaid for growth stocks - that was the bursting of the TMT bubble. People who had stuck with Value shares (which were totally bombed out by late 1999) actually did very well.

The depth of the bear market in 2001-2002 was when I personally made my best ever percentage returns - my small portfolio 16-bagged in 2 years, as there were so many amazing value opportnities to be had, and that gave me just about enough capital to leave my job and become a full time investor. Then I absolutely cleaned up in the bull market of 2003, and 8-bagged my portfolio again in 2003, to cross the 7-figure threshold, which was nice. It all went badly wrong in 2007-8, since hubris had set in, and I made some terrible mistakes of using too much gearing, in illiquid stocks, with over-sized positions. So some serious lessons, learned the hard way. I won't be repeating those mistakes ever again, and that's the reason I now take such a careful and methodical approach. When you're forced to downsize from a 5-bed detached on half an acre, to a 2-bed basement flat, you do a lot of thinking.

Anyway, so the point is that in this frothy market, I want to balance up grabbing some more exciting opportunities, but also keep some cash held back for grabbing the bargains when the correction inevitably occurs. Furthermore, value & GARP shares tend to drop the least in a correction anyway, so a (say) 10% portfolio drop is not something that should worry long-term investors.

I don't see anything likely to tip us into a full-blown bear market, although the Eurozone issue still concerns me - France and Italy being the biggest worry. Their profligate State spending habits simply are not compatible with a hard currency, so a collapse of the Euro is still a real possibility in my view, at some point a year or two down the line, if economic recovery has not saved the day.

 

 

 

 

Escher Group (LON:ESCH) has warned on profit, due to a significant contract having slipped from Q4 of this year into the first half of 2014. It doesn't sound too bad, as the software (for postal services worldwide) has been delivered, but the client will not have deployed it in enough workstations to trigger the licence payment by Escher's year-end. So on the fact of it that seems to only be a timing issue.

However, it emphasises just how lumpy Escher's sales & profits are, since they are still heavily dependent on licence revenue, although there is also some recurring revenue. It was this lumpiness, combined with difficulty in valuing the business, which was what put me off buying shares in it, despite being impressed with management and what they have achieved in becoming the dominant global supplier of postal service software, when they presented at an investor evening earlier this year, which I attended.

Their shares are down about 10% to 258p. This miss looks like it could wipe out pretty much all this year's profits, if forecasts included it. So I cannot see the share price recovering any time soon, and it's too hard to value. I don't see value here, so will move on.

 

 

 

 

One of the reasons I rarely invest in the very smallest microcaps (by which I mean sub-£5m market cap), is that the cost of maintaining a Listing (which is typically £150k+) cannot possibly be economic once you get down to that size. The trouble is, when they announce an intention to de-List, then the share price typically halves, as not many people tend to want to own shares in an Unlisted company.

This is a massive risk factor, that I often warn readers about. So when looking at micro caps, it's essential to consider whether the company has enough profits & cash to maintain its Listing, and whether the major shareholders want it to remain Listed. Also, I will pick up the phone and speak to the CEO, and ask him directly if the company is committed to remaining Listed. Of course they will always say yes, but it's how they say it that gives you the clues as to whether they are being truthful, or lying to you!

Invu (LON:INVU) is the latest micro cap to announce its intention to de-List, and the shares are down 42% to 0.35p. De-Listing requires a 75% yes vote at a General Meeting. In this case the market cap is now only about £0.6m, so it's daft such a tiny company being Listed. Although I note that the shareholder register is very fragmented, so they might struggle to get a 75% yes vote.

So please do be careful with these micro caps. They can deliver spectacular upside, but once you get down to market caps below £5m, there is a big risk of a de-Listing, which will be very harmful to your wealth.

 

 

 

 

The trading statement today from MDM Engineering (LON:MDM) looks interesting. It states that following the half year end of 30 Sep 2013, the company expects full year results (year to 31 Mar 2014) to be in line with market expectations.

This company is an engineer to the mining sector, where capex has been reduced greatly in some cases, due to the fall in the price of metals such as Gold. So it's interesting that MDM are still trading well, since the shares are priced quite low, presumably on market fears that trading is likely to deteriorate.

Market consensus is for 17.5p EPS this year, so at 153p that puts them on an attractive value multiple of only 8.7. Also, they pay out half post-tax earnings in dividends, so with a low PER comes an attractive dividend yield of about 5.8%.

Also, I've checked their Balance Sheet, and it looks very good - with plenty of net cash. So providing this level of earnings can be maintained, then the shares are good value. However, if they are working through contracts that are not likely to be replaced, then it could become a value trap if future earnings drop considerably. I don't know which is the case, but am suggesting that is the crux of the matter when researching this company.

 

 

 

 

Finally, there is a good trading statement from One Media IP (LON:OMIP). I saw this company present to investors earlier this year, and found their business model intriguing, and almost (but didn't) buy some shares. They buy up  outdated music and video, and then develop income streams from licensing it online. It's a small, but profitable niche, although clearly the company will need to do repeated fundraisings in order to grow significantly.

Broker consensus on Stockopedia is shown as 0.6p for this year, and 0.86p for next year, so that puts them on a pretty racy PER of 28 times 2012/13, and 19.8 times 2013/14 forecasts. I think that's way too high, so to my mind the doubling in share price in the last month looks pretty spurious, and is probably more down to bull market speculative frenzy than fundamentals.

 

 

 

Jolly good, that's all done for the day and the week.

Thank you to the many readers who have contributed to some fascinating & lively debate this week in the comments section below - please keep the comments coming, and I very much encourage readers to throw in your own opinions & experiences. The more interactive, the better. It's easy to register for free, there is a free option tucked away on the Plans page, which will enable you to comment. When registering, real names are preferred, but not obligatory.

Have a good weekend & see you back here on Monday morning.

Regards, Paul.

(of the companies mentioned today, Paul has a long position in PURI, and no short positions)

 

Disclaimer

This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

13 comments


Avatar for cig

Most of the French in London didn't pop up overnight, or even since Hollande came into power and fewer still are pure tax refugees. From a pure economic viewpoint it's not that good a deal, the tax rates are not that different (there are much better places to move to if you want low income tax than the UK!) and the difference in cost of living probably kills most of the pure economic advantage in many cases (pay less tax and twice the rent).

The euro is so consensual in Germany it's embarrassing. All the mainstream parties are behind it and the anti-euro party (which has it's place, in a democracy you shouldn't get 100% agreement on any topic) is not getting much traction. It wasn't really a significant topic at all during the election campaign. German politics is why the "Hard Euro/Soft Euro" idea, whatever its merits or lack thereof on paper, will never fly (at least not in the next decade or two, short of a major earthquake).

As for economic mix of varying economies, you can say the same for the currency union between say Yorkshire and London. They have very little in common economically, and it makes very little sense to share a currency on a purely business basis, but there's a political will to live together, which is enough to make the sterling zone function. The euro will function if the political will is there, and it's not 100% a done deal but I think on balance it's there.

On GDP/debt ratios, France currently borrows at or below the inflation target, so as things stand can roll over the debt in perpetuity without increasing it as a percentage of GDP even with zero growth. The issue is the primary deficit, but it's not so big it couldn't be surmounted if need be. If you combine top slicing the state's expenses with a bit of growth it's fine. France has favourable demographics too, so it'll get more GDP even if the economy doesn't progress just through current kids entering the workforce in a few years. Italy has a somewhat different combination of issues and it's tough but not mission impossible either. And at any time they can manage to merge the debts once you get the politics of a eurozone finance ministry sorted. The debt is often long dated, and 20 years is a long time in politics. So there's plenty of paths that exist without a hard or soft default. A default is possible but in no way unavoidable.

1
Avatar for andrewr

Thanks for your take on director dealings Paul, greatly appreciated.

0
Avatar for MichaelFBS

Thank you once again the inside track on the investment roller coaster that you have been on:

" When you're forced to downsize from a 5-bed detached on half an acre, to a 2-bed basement flat, you do a lot of thinking."

your experience Is something we can all learn from and very salutatory.

0
Avatar for emmo1210

Hi Paul,

Another great week of reports from you, very useful thanks

1
Avatar for Delpher

MDM the weak rand should also be taken into account.

0
Avatar for PhilHofGrowYourDough

Hi Paul,

Are you really concerned about France or do you mean Spain?

... "although the Eurozone issue still concerns me - France and Italy being the biggest worry."

Thanks
Phil

0
Avatar for Paul Scott

Hi Phil,

No I meant France, not Spain.
Political storm clouds are gathering, and I don't think the French people will forever tolerate the restrictions on their way of life that the Euro imposes.
Here's one example in an article from the Telegraph.
The anti-EU National Front are now the largest party in French politics. Who knows what might happen if their economy gets worse, which it probably will thanks to the suicidal policies of their current President - the wealthy are leaving in droves, and bringing their money with them, to London.

I still think the Euro will eventually either collapse, or (the better outcome) split into two - a German hard Euro, and a Southern European soft Euro, which of course will amount to soft default on a huge scale, and create another, bigger, worldwide financial crisis.

Cheers, Paul.

3
Avatar for cig

We need to find a platform where I can short your euro collapse bet. It will probably be a roller coaster (France and Italy do have problems) but I don't think it will disband, it's just a question of leaving time for the institutions behind it to be improved and adapted.

The restrictions the euro imposes on the French are very similar to those that regular devaluation -- which make everybody poorer -- imposed in the Franc era. It's the same thing expressed slightly differently.

As for the wealthy French "leaving in droves", do you have a source other than journalistic hyperbole? Of course there's been a few celebrity cases, which makes good copy, but if you look at it as a percentage of the folks concerned it's almost certainly tiny. As you should know, headline tax rates are of little concern to wealthy people who can afford a tax adviser.

0
Avatar for Paul Scott

Cig,

There are 400,000 French living in London, amazingly enough!
I don't call that tiny.

I'm not saying the Euro will definitely collapse, I'm just saying that there is a very significant risk that it could collapse at some point in the future. There are serious cracks developing between France & Germany. The Euro was always a doomed project - it's not possible to reconcile the efficiency of the German economy with the less productive Southern European economies. Sooner or later the weaker Euro economies (including France) will realise that the Euro exists mainly to give Germany an artificially cheap currency with which to continue their export boom, with the price being paid by other countries.

Look at the National Debt of Italy & France to GDP. If they cannot soft default that debt away through inflation & currency devaluation, then they are doomed. Being locked into a hard currency is the worst possible scenario when you have high levels of debt & an inefficient economy incapable of growth.

Cheers, Paul.

2
Avatar for ValuableGrowth

Hi Paul,

Advanced Computer Software released some decent interim results on Wednesday but I don't recall seeing a write up. I'm interested in your thoughts if you have time.

Thanks,

0
Avatar for AlanJenkins2

Why such a low 'z'' score on PURI [Minus 17.7] ? Input error ? The company is cash and cashflow positive.Sorry,Paul,not your department,I know.

0
Avatar for Edward Croft

Alan - regarding Puricore's deeply negative 'bankruptcy risk' reading. If you click the popup on the Altman Z Score you do see the factors that make the greatest contribution to the score. The big negative contributor to the negative reading is the fact that Retained Earnings are so deeply in the red. -£166m of retained earnings (losses). There's a lot of other paid in equity, but still the company's book equity was still in the red at the last annual set of accounts (though it has moved positive on a trailing 12 month basis). http://bit.ly/16rnemN

I always take the line that you have to mark out your territory as a 'Hunter' or a 'Farmer' in the markets - and the hunter has to do more due diligence on specifics. I'm happy to use these dumb algorithms across entire portfolios as they work extremely well at the aggregate level. But when getting into the nitty gritty of individual accounts things like the Altman Z-Score can require more nuance and interpretation. I tend to tell less sophisticated investors to just avoid companies with big red flags as there are plenty of other fish in the sea, but of course if one does the due dil and is comfortable that the factors contributing to these red flags are meaningless then they can be ignored.

PS - I really don't know Puricore from Adam and will pass on making any judgement in this case - but hope this answers your question.

5
Avatar for Paul Scott

Hi Alan,

Puricore refinanced in Jan 2013, converting loan notes into shares, so their finances are actually OK now. I covered this in my report of 20 Jun 2013 - here.

I reviewed their interim results here on 8 Aug, when I went into a lot more detail about their financial position, which looks OK to me.

So the poor Z-score is probably due to being based on the old figures, pre-refinancing.

Cheers, Paul.

1
Get the free newsletter