47
Archived articleThis is an archived article from 2016 - please note that any content within the article may be out of date.

Small Cap Value Report (4 Feb 2016) - DQE, SPL, AVN, ACSO

Good afternoon!

Let's start with a couple of Indian companies listed on AIM (brace yourselves!)

DQ Entertainment (LON:DQE)

Share price: 1.75p (down 60% today)
No. shares: 56.3m
Market cap: £1.0m

Update re General Meeting & Resignation of NOMAD - today's update is a catalogue of woes. It looks extremely likely that this joke share will probably de-list from AIM fairly soon. The usual way this happens these days is by NOMAD resignation. Allenby Capital has apparently served notice to resign on 22 Feb 2016. If no replacement NOMAD is found, then the shares will de-list on 23 Feb 2016.

There are further complications, in that Allenby has not been able to complete satisfactory due diligence on new Director appointments. Also, bond holders (who are owed $35m) would be able to claim immediate repayment (which the company says it is unable to do) in the event of the shares delisting, as delisting would constitute a default event.

To cap it all, legal action is being taken against the company to challenge the validity of the decisions taken at its last AGM. You couldn't make it up!

My opinion - this share has been covered in red flags since day 1, so why anyone in their right mind would hold shares in it, one can only guess at.

As usual, the big tell is Debtors. Whenever you see excessive debtors (which I would class as over a quarter of annual revenues from the income statement, as a general rule of thumb), then it means the company has probably inflated sales & profits, by booking revenues that won't actually be collected in as cash.

Over the past 3 years, I've written here about DQE a total of 9 times, and on 31 May 2013, my view couldn't have been more emphatic, "Debtors has now shot up to more than the year's turnover, so forget it - that's not a proper business!" - See more at: http://www.stockopedia.com/content/small-cap-repor..."

There's really no excuse for getting caught in such obvious joke shares. Anyone doing so isn't investing at all, they're just wildly, cluelessly, punting. The city has floated a wide array of rubbish shares on AIM which are designed to part you from your money, but it's really terribly easy to spot, and avoid them.

Above all, remember my golden rule of investing on AIM - if the company is essentially an overseas business, listed on AIM, then it's an automatic bargepole - because AIM's lax regulation, and no consequences for breaking the rules, has obviously become a magnet for con artists - willingly aided & abetted by city firms, non-execs, PRs, etc, which are happy to generate fees from them, and turn a blind eye to investors being fleeced. Either that, or we're expected to believe that all those fee earners are just desperately naive, and had no idea they were being taken in too. Hmmmm.



SKIL Ports & Logistics (LON:SPL)

Share price: 78.5p (up 14.5% today)
No. shares: 44.0m
Market cap: £34.5m

(at the time of writing, I hold a long position in this share)

Website update - all rules are made to be broken in special cases, and this is one of the very rare situations where I'm prepared to believe that an Indian AIM company may be genuine. The company has been building a new port (barge unloading) in India, and the market remains very sceptical about it.

However, from making enquiries, I'm reasonably comfortable that the project is real. The company has published drone video footage on its website, showing the site under construction.

I suppose it's possible that this might have been created in a CGI studio, so what do readers think - does the video footage look real to you, or not?

I've held shares in this particular company for some time now, as it is either an extraordinarily elaborate hoax, or it's real, If it's real, then the upside from such a low valuation could be considerable. Management seem to have previously built large infrastructure projects in India. We'll have to wait & see what happens, but I remain cautiously optimistic, that this one might be genuine.


Avanti Communications (LON:AVN)

Share price: 124.75p (down 9.6% today)
No. shares: 147.4m
Market cap: £183.9m

Interim results - these figures look dreadful to me. For the avoidance of doubt, I currently hold no position (long or short) in this share, but looking at these numbers, it seems to me very clear, crystal clear in fact, that the bear case holds water.

As readers know, I always make up my own mind about every share, and always make sure I read up on the bear case, not just the bull case. The whole apparatus of the city is geared towards pushing share prices up, so it's always refreshing to read analysis from someone prepared to take the opposite, bearish, stance.

Sometimes such bearish analysis does not hold water, and I will strongly defend my long positions against a bear raid (as I did with both BOO & TRAK), but in most cases I've found that bears are usually correct, in the long run. So if high profile bears, with a track record of exposing poor companies, are all bearish, then I sit up and listen, as they could well be onto something. Listening to the bear case on TUNG saved me a packet, as I realised that Matt Earl's analysis was correct, and I closed my long at over 200p per share.

Back to Avanti Comms, here are the specific problems;


56b350e951785Avanti_Comms_P&L.PNG

1. There's been no progress on the top line - revenues are flat against last year's H1, at $31m.

2. It is providing a service at below cost price! So note the gross loss of $10.2m. Although reversing the (non-cash) depreciation charge of $22.8m would give a pre-depreciation gross profit of $12.6m for the six months.

3. There seems to be seasonality such that H2 is stronger than H1. Assuming that pattern, then gross profit may again come out at around breakeven. However, there are then a load of additional costs to take into account - e.g. $18.4m operating expenses, and $17.6m finance expense in H1. That's $36m per half year, or $72m per full year, with no gross profit at all to support these costs - which can only therefore be funded from continued cash burn.

4. Why is the interest cost so high? This is because Avanti has a ton of debt - the balance sheet is a real mess - the $730m of historic costs which have been capitalised into fixed assets, are arguably of little value, if no return is actually being generated from them! So I would argue that a large write-off is necessary.

5. Debt - the company has financed itself with high yield bonds - junk bonds - yielding 10% interest for the holders. It's a massive amount too, at $627.4m. That would be fine if Avanti had assets which are generating an enormous return, but it doesn't! So how will the company pay the interest, let alone repay the capital?

Outlook - the company dangles the prospect of jam tomorrow;

Avanti's expectations for 50% growth in continuing revenue on a constant currency basis in the full 2016 financial year are supported by the substantial recent order wins, which will make a material contribution to revenue in the current half year and a very strong pipeline of opportunities that are in advanced stages of negotiation. As revenue builds, Avanti is expected to become significantly cash generative, due to a combination of the revenue growth and a largely fixed cash cost base.

My opinion - with 2 new satellites to be launched, and a strong pipeline, it looks likely that revenues will increase. However, in order to get anywhere near to being a viable business, revenues need to increase very substantially - i.e. multiples of the current run rate, just to service the debt interest, and operating costs.

Therefore anyone holding the equity has to be supremely confident that the company can indeed grow its cashflow very considerably, and enough to cope with the mountain of very expensive debt. The company says that it is hoping to refinance the debt in 2019 at lower rates - assuming it gets to 2019 without having wiped out equity holders with dilutive fundraisings to continue paying the interest bill on the bonds.

It seems to me that the bondholders are in the driving seat here, and you would have to be an extraordinary optimist to believe that the company can transform its fortunes enough to be able to survive in its current structure, let alone prosper. The very fact that the company had to use 10% bonds to finance its capex, suggests that other forms of more conventional funding were not forthcoming.

Therefore I am leaning heavily towards the bear case on this share. The equity looks completely worthless to me. However that view is subject to change, if sufficiently profitable growth is generated to make the company cash generative in future. EBITDA positive is no use at all of course, since it's the interest cost which is the killer here, so that cannot be ignored.


accesso Technology (LON:ACSO)

Share price: 903p (up 5.3% today)
No. shares: 22.0m
Market cap: £198.7m

(at the time of writing, I hold a long position in this share)

Trading update - this sounds good;

The Board of accesso Technology Group plc (AIM: ACSO), the premier technology solutions provider to leisure, entertainment and cultural markets, is pleased to announce that it expects Group performance to be comfortably in line with expectations for the year ended 31 December 2015.  This strong performance has been achieved despite significant investment in the business relating to last summer's transformative agreement with Merlin Entertainments Group Ltd.

The Board is also pleased to report a strong start to 2016, where all accesso business lines are reporting good momentum.

Valuation - broker consensus is for $0.41 for 2015, so that's a PER of about 28p, therefore the PER at 903p comes out at 32.3 - gulp! A pretty warm valuation, for sure.

My opinion - I think Accesso can be classified as a super-stock - because it is exploiting a niche, with very little competition, and winning contracts globally with highly credible customers, and establishing recurring revenues which are very sticky.

What tipped it for me, was the announcement about winning all sites operated by Merlin. That's the sort of game-changing announcement that I look out for, and I explained why I was buying the shares at around 615p here on 30 Jul 2015. We're up nearly 47% in just over 6 months since then, and I'm sitting tight.

The downside risk is obviously that, priced to perfection, there's no safety margin for anything going wrong. So today's reassuring update certainly helps shore up confidence.


Disclaimer

This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

23 comments


Avatar for Jon1958

Re SKIL Ports & Logistics (LON:SPL) - I don't pretend any expertise but work as a lawyer in the construction industry and have shown the photos to a few people who know what they are talking about. FWIW their feedback is that it looks genuine but not like a project that is cracking on at full speed with a high level of resources committed to it. This said I am Long this stock and have recently topped up in a small way given but with a stop loss given recent momentum in the price.

0
Avatar for garkum01

spot on andrea, plenty of legitimate investments out there, paying good divvies too without worrying whether
an Indian port is genuine or not.

1
Avatar for hayashi22

Who listed/sponsored Dongfang? Bank/broker/NOMAD. Anyone know?

0
Avatar for andrea34

Years ago I held shares in some dodgy Chinese outfit (can't remember offhand the name now) that sound very similar to SPL, it included port logistics with promises of huge trade once the port activities were finished... and the whole thing went pear-shaped with accounting irregularities and fraud and de-listed from AIM. Maybe SPL is completely different... but they sound hugely speculative and I wonder whether they are worth people biting their nails over when there are so many other companies out there to invest in.

0
Avatar for darlocst

Perhaps you mean Dongfang? It was a basket case from the moment it listed. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/da3ad606-7a42-11e1-839f-00144feab49a.html#axzz3zI10tgnz

TBH there are no similarities apart from lazy stereotyping. You're making 2 mistakes here: #1 to invest in a crap Chinese company. #2 To dismiss SKIL Ports & Logistics (LON:SPL) without doing proper research.

This tendency for UK investors bunch all Chinese & Indian UK listed companies together as basically frauds throws up good investing opportunities from time to time. SKIL Ports & Logistics (LON:SPL) looked like one of those last year & recently progress underlines that.

1
Avatar for andrea34

No, I don't mean Dongfang, I checked my dealing history and it was called Yinggao Holdings when it de-listed (Arko when I bought them). I am dismissing SPL from my own point-of-view as I am not in a position to deal in something that is so speculative... and considering that is has no turnover and it's price shot up 9.5p yesterday based on mere video footage of the construction site then I think I am totally correct to state that it is very speculative. That doesn't mean it is not suitable for anyone, and it doesn't mean that they won't eventually become massively profitable... as per my 'maybe' comment.

2
Avatar for cig

Re SKIL Ports & Logistics (LON:SPL), the question is not much a question whether the port is real, but whether the AIM listed thing really owns it, and if so will they ever repatriate any profit to AIM shareholders. The best scenario for the principals is that UK investors pay for (some of) the build, and they keep the profits. What could be their rationale for sending money back to Blighty?

0
Avatar for qimotte

I'm not an investor in Accesso and haven't researched the firm lately. But that is for one simple reason. When I did look into Accesso's solution to queuing it looked as if was a brilliant solution for its day, but was going to be superseded by the ubiquity of the smart phone. And isn't that's what happening with Shanghai Disneyland opening later this year? If Shanghai's app based system is successful won't that be an end to Accesso's growth?

0
Avatar for DJLJ23

I think its the opposite, Accesso LoQueue services has 3 lines (QSmart (phones), QBot (The orginal device), Qband (Waterparks). smart phones removes the need for them to provide a device. (other than for water based activities). there by leveraging their central infrastructure and removing capital spend also increasing the attractiveness to clients.
What might be more of a problem is if Disney decided to make their service available to competitors, but would a competitor want to share their valuable data with Disney. An independent supplier with no competition issues makes more sense.

2
Avatar for fft100

Jones Jeff,

Having physically been there, had a trip up and down the creek by boat, and then been dropped off 1km away and driven through the new light industrial park just behind it, and also driven on to and stood on the reclaimed land, I can assure you it is the same place :-)

3
Avatar for jonesj

I haven't figured out how flying a drone over a modest construction site proves (i) the site is the one where the port is being constructed & (ii) the company concerned actually owns the site & project.

5
Avatar for Sajid Herwitker

Thanks Paul.
Good article, looking at 3 & 5 year trend, a agree SKIL is one for a long position.

0
Avatar for PJBY

vik2001. The delays were not due to the workforce not wanting to work 24/7. The delays were caused by locals either after compensation or worried over noise and access and the effect on their environment. and blocking access. I believe 95% of these issues are now sorted and 24/7 has been operational. I also note the siting of flood lights on site which is an indication 24/7 is still progressing.

4
Avatar for PJBY

Paul
SPL. I have spoken to both Broker and NEDS who have visited site, so we know for a fact that works are ongoing. This has been further proved by Google earth view. Main concern now is around funding and if any further objections from the local inhabitants develop. There are 2 Ports in proximity to Karanja, both suffer with vessels queing for access, resulting in additional costs to the shipping Companies. Throw in the mix of massive growth and imports to India over the next decade and the need for the port is clear to see. However, subject to the above, I do still have some reservations about Management, although it is improving. As for the original question. It is now boyond doubt to me that the Port is being built. Total reclamation (land fill) is almost 25% complete. Best PJ

6
Avatar for vik2001

SKIL had issues a while back I read with workers not wanting to work shifts 24 hours, which were resolved by management and made the share price go up at that time.

0
Avatar for loglorry

Paul weirdly I thought that SPL video looked a bit fake too. After looking at it again though I think it is just that the frame rate from the drone was a bit slow which made it look a bit jumpy. I can't imagine they'd go to that length anyway but I guess you never know. Looks a reasonable punt in small size but I'm not invested.

2
Avatar for Jardine

Regarding SKIL Ports & Logistics (LON:SPL), building the port infrastructure is one thing but getting the trade to make it pay is quite another. The warning bell for me was in the interim statement when it said that the port was originally intended to be a container port but plans are now for it to be based on project and break bulk cargoes in the early years. Project cargos are things like heavy lifts and will be irregular if they happen at all. The margins will depend on what other suitable and available quay space is in the area. I understand there is an existing container port very close by. They may be able to attract some break bulk business but so much is now transported in containers due to the cost advantages. I talked to a port recently who were even shipping iron ore in containers due to the cost effectiveness.

3
Avatar for Ken Lowes

Thanks Paul That is clear and concise.

0
Avatar for BlueFrew

I was already short of Avanti based on fundamentals. I've been increasing my short since I read this story last month: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/01/25/folk_shun_subsidised_satellite_broadband/

0
Avatar for FREng

Paul

Would you consider developing a spreadsheet of AIM advisors who have been associated with disastrous IPOs, together with a list of the companies that currently retain them as advisors?

If it is just factual, it shouldn't be libellous (note: I Am Not A Lawyer), and it could serve two purposes: helping PIs to steer clear of dodgy companies, and encouraging advisors to be more professional, honest and diligent.

3
Avatar for homebrewruss

Hi Paul,
re SKIL Ports & Logistics (LON:SPL) It's definitely worth being a bit sceptical but I'm pretty sure the footage is real.
It would be very impressive to make cgi like this and also extremely expensive. Also the footage ties in well with the progress from the photo reports and the progress that has been available via Google earth's satellite which as far as I know can't be tampered with by the company.

4
Avatar for Ken Lowes

Paul DQE you said "Above all, remember my golden rule of investing on AIM - if the company is essentially an overseas business, listed on AIM, then it's an automatic bargepole - " and yet you hold SPL an Indian company registered in Guernsey? Explain please.

3
Avatar for Paul Scott

ken,

I've already explained in the article.

Rules are made to be broken, if an exceptional case arises. So what I'm saying is that, in normal circumstances, I wouldn't touch any AIM overseas listed company. However, if I'm satisfied that a particular company does properly check out, which is not very often the case, then I might take a risk on it.

So Somero Enterprises Inc (LON:SOM) is a good example of an overseas AIM company which gets through my usual block on this type of company, because it's been listed on AIM for nearly 10 years, pays divis, and is located in the USA, which if anything has better standards of corporate governance than the UK. Also I like, and trust management.

SKIL Ports & Logistics (LON:SPL) - I wouldn't say I'm 100% sure about it, by any means, but the upside potential is sufficiently large, and appears to be genuine from the enquiries that I've made, that I think it's worth a punt.

So the default setting for me is no overseas AIM companies. But occasionally, after carefully checking it out, I'll let the odd one through into my portfolio.

Regards, Paul.

6
Get the free newsletter