Small Cap Value Report (6 Feb 2014) - WIN, RHL, CBUY, PTD, MTEC

Thursday, Feb 06 2014 by
20

Good morning!

 

 

Wincanton (LON:WIN)

This is a logistics group (e.g. transport & warehousing) with one of the worst Balance Sheets you are likely to ever see. It amazes me that the auditors (KPMG) are happy to sign off their accounts, when the company's financial position is so bad.

Not only is there a £101.9m deficit on net current assets (being £254.9m current assets, less £356.8m current liabilities) shown in the last Annual Report (as at 31 Mar 2013), but there is an additional £405m of long term creditors! (being £196.9m debt, £148.7m pension fund deficit, and £59.4m in other provisions).

So strip out intangibles, and net tangible assets were negative to the tune of £400.9m! That's beyond bad, it's off the scale horrendous. Therefore this share is completely uninvestable at any price in my opinion. It's frightening how many investors are completely ignoring financial strength at the moment, cheerfully ignoring massive liabilities in this case, and just valuing the business on its PER.

The trouble with that, is that in all likelihood this business will need all the cashflow it generates for the foreseeable future to service & reduce debt, and the pension fund. Dividends stopped in 2011, and it would be reckless for them to re-start. Therefore the way I look at things, these shares are worth nothing.

Anyway, not that it really matters, but the company reports today that it is trading in line with market expectations.

 

 

 

 

Redhall (LON:RHL)

I went through the accounts of Redhall in detail about a month ago, and came to the conclusion that it was very high risk - with far too much debt, and operating in a low margin, difficult sector - similar activities to Silverdell, whose bank unexpectedly pulled the plug on them last year for reasons that are still unknown. In that case the CEO & a vulture company hived off the decent parts of the business, leaving shareholders with nothing, which most people agree was a total disgrace.

Redhall's financial position actually looks to me worse than Silverdell, with more debt, so they are completely reliant on the ongoing support of the Bank - who have extended facilities to Sep 2015, but do I really want to invest in any situation…

Unlock this article instantly by logging into your account

Don’t have an account? Register for free and we’ll get out your way

Disclaimer:  

As per our Terms of Use, Stockopedia is a financial news & data site, discussion forum and content aggregator. Our site should be used for educational & informational purposes only. We do not provide investment advice, recommendations or views as to whether an investment or strategy is suited to the investment needs of a specific individual. You should make your own decisions and seek independent professional advice before doing so. Remember: Shares can go down as well as up. Past performance is not a guide to future performance & investors may not get back the amount invested. ?>


Do you like this Post?
Yes
No
20 thumbs up
0 thumbs down
Share this post with friends



Wincanton plc is a provider of supply chain solutions. The Company operates through two segments: Retail & Consumer, and Industrial & Transport. Its Retail & Consumer segment focuses on consumer products business and brings to customers through the entire supply chain from producer to retailer, and Industrial & Transport segment focuses on an integrated and optimized transport operation, and includes Containers business and Pullman business. Its Pullman business provides transport and fleet services. The Company provides its services to a range of sectors, such as retail, which includes fashion logistics, e-commerce, food, health and beauty, leisure and lifestyle, consumer electronics and paper products, as well as manufacturing, which includes water, milk and bulk food, construction, consumer goods, energy and defense. The Company provides a range of services, including road transport, warehousing and value added services. Its value added services include packaging and consultancy. more »

LSE Price
267p
Change
3.1%
Mkt Cap (£m)
322.6
P/E (fwd)
7.5
Yield (fwd)
4.6

Redhall Group plc is engaged in providing manufacturing and specialist services. The Company's segments include Manufacturing and Specialist Services. Its Manufacturing segment encompasses the design, manufacture and installation of bespoke specialist plant and equipment typically in the nuclear defense, nuclear decommissioning, oil and gas, petrochemical, chemical, pharmaceutical and food sectors. It is also involved in the design and manufacture of integrity fire and blast resistant doors, window and wall systems. It serves the nuclear, oil and gas, defense, marine, industrial, pharmaceutical, architectural and water industries. Its Specialist Services segment comprises activities in installation and maintenance of the telecommunications network infrastructure, design, manufacture and installation of process lines in food and pharmaceutical markets and specialist surface finishings to Astute class submarines. Its marine business provides surface finishing. more »

LSE Price
1.6p
Change
 
Mkt Cap (£m)
5.3
P/E (fwd)
5.7
Yield (fwd)
n/a

cloudBuy plc is a provider of an integrated software platform for e-procurement and e-commerce for the trading of goods and services between purchasers, such as public sector bodies and their suppliers, along with the analysis and coding of spend and product data. The Company's operating segments include Company Formation Services, Web and ecommerce services and Coding International Limited. It also provides services to new businesses, including incorporation, company secretary services and filing annual returns, using its software platform. Its solutions include e-commerce Marketplaces, e-commerce Websites, Purchasing Portals, SpendInsight and Company formations. SpendInsight service provides regular analysis of any company's historical spend data. It offers a range of Website packages from templated solutions to Intranets and global business-to-business (B2B) e-commerce sites. The cloudBuy platform enables rapid extension of its solutions and development of new applications. more »

LSE Price
1.98p
Change
 
Mkt Cap (£m)
2.6
P/E (fwd)
n/a
Yield (fwd)
n/a



  Is LON:WIN fundamentally strong or weak? Find out More »


10 Comments on this Article show/hide all

MrM 6th Feb '14 1 of 10

If we're heading for another stock market mania, cloud businesses would be top of my list.
Besides CloudBuy (@UK), there is also Outsourcery, with it's Dragon's Den investor, Piers Linney, and CloudTag.

As Charles Kindleberger wrote, "There is nothing so disturbing to one’s well-being and judgment as to see a friend get rich."

Are there any of these businesses that actually make any money? I'd hate to get left behind.

| Link | Share
harry34 6th Feb '14 2 of 10
1

I bought into Pittards (LON:PTD) too Paul, (although before the recent share consolidation). Another reason to buy is their declared intention to resume dividend payments. I have no idea on the likely level - could be just a token - but a promising sign. Thank you again for your wonderfully insightful, and refreshingly honest reports.

| Link | Share
mrmodha 6th Feb '14 3 of 10

The reason I would not invest in Cloudbuy (LON:CBUY) is probably the same as yours - I can get zero handle on what value their service adds, or why it would be deemed worthy by their potential market. To me, sadly, another bandwagon jumper with cloud services that don't actually offer a solution that people want or need.

| Link | Share
stocktrawler 6th Feb '14 4 of 10

The high net debt and poor cash-flow on Pittards put me off

| Link | Share
eastheath 6th Feb '14 5 of 10
1

I get it that WIN's balance sheet is awful, what I don't get is the sp 'recovery' from 40p to140p in last ten months. Were they lucky punters or clever punters, those that bought in April 2013?

| Link | Share
pdownes 6th Feb '14 6 of 10

Wincanton (LON:WIN) did manage to reduce it's debt around 20% between March and September according to Investor's Chronicle which seems positive if they keep it up.

| Link | Share
MacroVal 6th Feb '14 7 of 10
4

Paul,

As an ex auditor (specifically, and in this context appropriately, with KPMG) I feel it necessary to point out that the auditor doesn't take a view on signing off the accounts - their job is state that they reflect the position of the company in a true and fair manner.

KPMG could have included a statement about the going concern of the company if they felt that this was something that should be brought to the shareholders attention. Similarly. they could have offered a qualified opinion as to the validity of reported results.

It's the directorate's job to ensure the numbers are any good!

From the report, and for reference:

Respective responsibilities of Directors and auditor
As explained more fully in the Directors’ Responsibilities Statement set out on page 38, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being
satisfied that they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit, and express an opinion on, the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International
Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices Board’s Ethical Standards for Auditors.


Further on going concern:

As part of the year end process the Directors have undertaken a going concern review,
as required by IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements, including determining the
headroom available when the Group’s facilities are compared to the forecast monthly
cash flows for the forthcoming financial year and sensitising the borrowing covenants
to give an indication of the headroom therein. Having undertaken this review the
Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company and the Group overall
have adequate resources to continue to meet their obligations as they fall due and
satisfy their borrowing covenants for the foreseeable future. Accordingly these
financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis.

MacroVal

| Link | Share | 1 reply
Paul Scott 6th Feb '14 8 of 10
2

In reply to post #81184

Hi MV,

I take your points, but given the extreme negative net assets position with WIN, I am very surprised that KPMG did not choose to cover themselves by including an emphasis of matter type paragraph in the audit report, which are sometimes used in situations when going concern is an issue.

I think this case shows how little value one should ascribe to the audit report (speaking as an ex-auditor myself too). I've often heard investors say things along the lines of, "everything must be fine, as they got a clean audit report", which is dangerous, as the audit report really provides virtually zero investor protection.

Regards, Paul.

| Link | Share
MacroVal 6th Feb '14 9 of 10
2

I agree with you points - which is why we a probably both ex audiotrs...!

Can still see a shake / break up of big 4 somewhere down the line

I always take Northern Rock's clean audit report as case in point - right before its failure in 2007

I suppose this is a reflection of the folly of forecasting - I'm reminded of Montier's excellent little book of behavioral investing.

Either KPMG were vindicated in giving a clean bill of health if Wincanton turn it around tomorrow, or the criticism is justified.... Only time will tell


(Like youI, I'll stay well clear)

MV

 

 

| Link | Share
mpat89 6th Feb '14 10 of 10
2

Auditor in training speaking here... surprising to see no emphasis of matter paragraph if the company has net liabilities, even if post year end position has improved?!

Professional Services: Web hosting
| Link | Share

Please subscribe to submit a comment



 Are LON:WIN's fundamentals sound as an investment? Find out More »



About Paul Scott

Paul Scott

I trained as an accountant with a Top 5 firm, but that was so boring that I spent too much time in the 1990s being a disco bunny, and busting moves on the dancefloor, and chilling out with mates back at either my house or theirs, and having a lot of fun!Then spent 8 years as FD for a ladieswear retail chain called "Pilot", leaving on great terms in 2002 - having been a key player in growing the business 10 fold. If the truth be told, I partied pretty hard at the weekends too, so bank reconciliations on Monday mornings were more luck than judgement!! But they were always correct.I got bored with that and decided to become a professional small caps investor in 2002. I made millions, but got too cocky, and lost the lot in 2008, due to excessive gearing. A miserable, wilderness period occurred from 2008-2012.Since then, the sun has begun to shine again! I am now utterly briliant again, and immerse myself in small caps, and am a walking encyclopedia on the subject. I love writing a daily report for Stockopedia.com on most weekday mornings, constantly researching daily results & trading updates for small caps. Cheese! more »

Follow



Stock Picking Tutorial Centre



Let’s get you setup so you get the most out of our service
Done, Let's add some stocks
Brilliant - You've created a folio! Now let's add some stocks to it.

  • Apple (AAPL)

  • Shell (RDSA)

  • Twitter (TWTR)

  • Volkswagon AG (VOK)

  • McDonalds (MCD)

  • Vodafone (VOD)

  • Barratt Homes (BDEV)

  • Microsoft (MSFT)

  • Tesco (TSCO)
Save and show me my analysis