REG - Future Metals NL - Sulphide Intercepts Define New Target Zone
17/11/2022 07:01
For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
http://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20221117:nRSQ6603Ga&default-theme=true
RNS Number : 6603G Future Metals NL 17 November 2022
17 November 2022
Future Metals NL
Sulphide Intercepts Define New Target Zone at Panton
Highlights
§ Diamond drilling has intersected near-surface sulphide mineralisation,
providing further evidence for a large new Ni-Cu-PGE sulphide system at Panton
§ Heavily disseminated to matrix-textured sulphides have been intersected in
the south (holes PS411 and PS412) within broader intervals of over 40 metres
of disseminated sulphides
§ Intersections demonstrate prospective new mineralised zone, 4km south-west
of the known high-grade chromite reef-hosted mineralisation
§ Coincident with large gravity anomaly, interpreted to be a continuation of
the keel position in the north
§ Over 350m of disseminated magmatic sulphides intercepted in hole PS410,
distal area to keel position underlying the chromite-reef hosted
mineralisation
§ Six diamond drill holes completed to date in the ongoing programme, with
every hole intersecting sulphide mineralisation
§ Down hole electromagnetics ("DHEM") and a ground-based electromagnetic
("EM") survey over the gravity anomaly areas to begin shortly
§ Drilling of the highly prospective keel position to begin imminently
Figure 1 | Semi-massive sulphide bearing core from hole PS411
Figure 2 | Matrix sulphide bearing core from hole PS412
Future Metals NL ("Future Metals" or the "Company", ASX | AIM: FME), is
pleased to provide an update on its ongoing drilling programme at its wholly
owned Panton project ("Panton" or "the Project").
Further to the Company's announcement on 3 November 2022 (Drilling Confirms
Sulphide System at Panton), the Company has completed an additional three
diamond drill holes for approximately 540m, with sulphide mineralisation
intersected in each hole. This brings total drilled metres for the 2022
exploration season to approximately 1,340m across six holes, with each hole
intersecting sulphide mineralisation. The sulphide intersections range from
fine grained and weakly disseminated to very locally, semi-massive. Table 1
below provides the logging notes and percentage estimates of sulphide
mineralisation, based on portable X-Ray Fluorescence ("pXRF") analysis and
visual estimation of the logging geologist (analytical laboratory results are
pending).
Mr Jardee Kininmonth, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Future
Metals, commented:
"It is incredibly encouraging to have our sulphide exploration programme
continue to be validated with positive results. PS411 and PS412 open up a
completely new target zone in the south, an area which was previously
overlooked due to minimal outcropping chromite reef relative to the resource
area in the north-east. Our advanced gravity inversion modelling, EM surveys
and recent drilling have uncovered what is a highly prospective zone which is
interpreted to be an extension of the keel position identified under the
chromite reefs.
"Further, in hole PS410 we have drilled over 350m of magmatically emplaced
disseminated sulphides near the chromite reefs, in the outer area of the keel
position. This is again, extremely encouraging as it aligns with multiple
analogues for this style of mineralisation, with disseminated sulphides
forming a 'cloud' or 'halo' around a keel position which is more heavily
mineralised. This provides us with confidence that the keel position will
ultimately be shown to host a large sulphide body."
Holes PS411 and PS412
Drill holes PS411 and PS412 were targeting EM conductors in the south of the
Panton Project area. The EM targets are broadly coincident with the large
gravity anomaly in the south, identified through a recent gravity survey.
Similarly, the targets are coincident with the fold line of the Panton
intrusion, in an area of significantly high strain.
Both holes intersected heavily disseminated to matrix-textured sulphide
mineralisation within a broader zone of disseminated sulphides. These
sulphides have been confirmed by both visual inspection and pXRF analysis to
be chalcopyrite (copper sulphide mineral) bearing but are not significantly
nickel enriched. This sulphide mineralisation is clearly hosted by a
high-strain shear zone and the Company's interpretation is that it may
represent structural-hydrothermal remobilisation from an underlying primary
magmatic source.
Within hole PS411 two zones of significant mineralisation were intersected, a
2m zone of 20% massive pyrrhotite and a 5cm band of 50% semi-massive sulphide
mineralisation. In both intervals, pyrrhotite is dominant with lesser
chalcopyrite. Disseminated mineralisation encompasses these intervals with
up to 5% disseminated pyrrhotite with minor chalcopyrite over a 39.3m
interval.
In hole PS412, the main zone of mineralisation extends for 10.7m with blebby
to disseminated pyrrhotite and minor chalcopyrite, with an increase in matrix
sulphide up to 20% in a high strain zone.
In this context, it is significant that these sulphide intersections are
spatially coincident with a large gravity anomaly. This anomaly potentially
shows an extension of the keel position, 4km to the south-west of the keel
zone identified near the chromite reefs in the north-east of the Project area.
These encouraging visual results from initial drilling confirm this southern
area of the Project as a new target zone.
Hole PS410
Hole PS410 was drilled in the 'Lower Zone' of the Panton Intrusion, in the
north-east near the chromite reefs, testing a large magnetic anomaly (refer
announcement dated 3 November 2022) distal to the interpreted 'keel' position
in this area. The hole intersected over 350m of fine grained weakly
disseminated to disseminated sulphides, of clear magmatic origin, with pXRF
analysis confirming the presence of chalcopyrite and nickel-bearing
mineralisation. This provides further evidence of a potentially significantly
mineralised 'keel' position near the chromite reefs.
Ongoing Programme
Although the mineralisation appears to be remobilised, it is significant in
that sulphides are present in gabbroic to anorthositic lithologies which
overlay the dunite and chromite reefs of the complex. These drill holes are
over 4km to the south-west of hole PS410 which intersected over 350m of
disseminated intercumulus magmatic sulphides in dunite. This demonstrates
the potential for the Panton Intrusion to host a significant sulphide system
in addition to its chromite-hosted Platinum Group Metals ("PGM") reefs.
The Company has commenced drilling into the keel position into the north and
will shortly begin running DHEM on each of the completed drill holes to
identify further targets, and complete ground-based EM surveys over the
gravity anomaly areas.
Figure 3 | Disseminated sulphide bearing core from PS412
Figure 4 | Magnetic Inversion with Gravity Anomalies and Fixed Loop
Electromagnetic ("FLEM") Conductors
The below logging notes from observations made in the field of the drill core
are from visual observations only, with supporting evidence from pXRF
analysis; analytical laboratory results are pending and further announcements
will be made in due course. Sulphide mineralisation and metal contents are not
directly correlated. Assays are required to determine metal content (ie. Pd,
Pt, Au, Ni, Cu values). The sulphides in hole PS410 are predominantly fine
grained and as such have not been reported as discrete sulphide minerals
unless otherwise noted.
Table 1: Panton Summary Logs - Sulphide Mineralisation
Hole ID From (m) To Length (m) Lithology Mineralisation Description Sulphide % (Visual Estimate)
(m)
PS410 33 39.5 6.5 Dunite, orthocumulate <1%
39.5 87.0 47.5 Dunite, orthocumulate, patchy strong serpentinisation <1%
87.0 113 26 Dunite, orthocumulate <1%
113 118 5 Dunite, orthocumulate <1%
118 171.8 53.8 Dunite, orthocumulate <1%
171.8 321.4 149.6 Dunite, orthocumulate <1%
321.4 321.6 0.2 Dunite, orthocumulate <1%
321.6 347 25.4 Dunite, sheared 342 to 343m, strong serpentinisation on shear <1%
347 348 1 Dunite, orthocumulate <1%
348 367.8 19.8 Dunite, orthocumulate, narrow bands of strong serpentinisation <1%
367.8 369.8 2 Dunite, orthocumulate, strong pervasive serpentinisation <1%
373 384.5 11.5 Dunite, orthocumulate <1%
384.5 401 16.5 Dunite, orthocumulate <1%
PS411 9.00 11.00 2.00 Intensely altered gabbro 2% po, cpy
11.00 14.80 3.80 Intensely altered gabbro <1% po, cpy
14.80 16.60 1.80 Altered gabbro with planar fabric - foliation or shearing? 1% po, cpy
16.60 17.60 1.00 Intensely altered gabbro 6% po, cpy
17.60 19.60 2.00 Intensely altered gabbro/matrix sulphide. Planar fabric 20% po, cpy
19.60 21.40 1.80 Intensely altered gabbro. Multiphase alteration with late carbonate overprint. 4% po, cpy
21.40 21.45 0.05 Semi-massive sulphide 55% po, cpy
21.45 32.10 10.65 Intensely altered gabbro. Multiphase alteration with late carbonate overprint 1% po, cpy
32.10 35.20 3.10 Intensely altered gabbro. Multiphase alteration with late carbonate overprint <1% po, cpy
35.20 50.10 14.90 Intensely altered rock, fine to medium grained Late carbonate overprint <1% po, cpy
PS412 52.90 53.80 0.90 Pervasively silica altered Gabbro/Norite <1%
53.80 55.50 1.70 Pervasively silica altered Gabbro/Norite 10% po, cpy
55.50 56.60 1.10 Pervasively silica altered Gabbro/Norite 5% po
56.60 63.50 6.90 Pervasively silica altered Gabbro/Norite 1% po
63.50 64.50 1.00 Pervasively silica altered Gabbro/Norite 20% po
64.50 107.60 43.10 Pervasively silica altered Gabbro/Norite <1% - 3% po
po = Pyrrhotite, cpy = Chalcopyrite, pn = Pentlandite, py = Pyrite
For further information, please contact:
Enquiries:
Future Metals NL +61 8 9480 0414
Jardee Kininmonth info@future-metals.com.au (mailto:info@future-metals.com.au)
Strand Hanson Limited (Financial & Nominated Adviser) +44 (0) 207 409 3494
James Harris/James Bellman
Panmure Gordon (UK) Limited (UK Broker) +44 (0)207 886 2500
John Prior/Hugh Rich/Soman Thakran
White Noise Communications (Australian IR/PR) +61 400 512 109
Fiona Marshall
FlowComms (UK IR/PR) +44 (0) 789 167 7441
Sasha Sethi
Competent Person's Statement
The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is
based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Shane Hibbird, who
is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and the
Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Hibbird is the Company's Exploration
Manager and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of
mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity he
is undertaking to qualify as a competent person as defined in the 2012 Edition
of the "Australasian Code for reporting of Exploration Results, Exploration
Targets, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves" (JORC Code). Mr Hibbird consents
to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based upon his
information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to
constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulation
(EU) No. 596/2014 as is forms part of United Kingdom domestic law pursuant to
the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, as amended.
Notes to Editors
PGMs are a group of six precious metals being Platinum (Pt), palladium (Pd),
iridium (Ir), osmium (Os), rhodium (Rh), and ruthenium (Ru).
Exceptionally rare, they have similar physical and chemical properties and
tend to occur, in varying proportions, together in the same geological
deposit. The usefulness of PGMs is determined by their unique and specific
shared chemical and physical properties.
PGMs have many desirable properties and as such have a wide variety of
applications. Most notably, they are used as autocatalysts (pollution control
devices for ICE vehicles), but are also used in jewellery, electronics,
hydrogen production / purification and in hydrogen fuel cells.
The unique properties of PGMs help convert harmful exhaust pollutant emissions
to harmless compounds, improving air quality and thereby enhancing health and
wellbeing.
Appendix 1 | Panton Diamond Drill Hole Collar Details
Hole ID Hole Type Easting Northing RL (m) Total Depth (m) Inc (deg) Azi (deg)
PS407 Diamond core 376456 8036810 490 300 -82 350.6
PS408 Diamond core 375920 8037027 437 200 -60 324
PS409 Diamond core 375860 8036770 455 300 -60 290
PS410 Diamond core 376070 8036930 437 401 -58 038
PS411 Diamond core 375505 8033370 390 50 -60 340
PS412 Diamond core 374687 8032799 400 90 -60 135
Appendix 2 | JORC Code (2012) Edition Table 1
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling techniques § Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific § No sampling is reported
specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals
under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF
instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad
meaning of sampling.
§ Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.
§ Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the
Public Report. In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this
would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to
obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for
fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where
there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities
or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of
detailed information.
Drilling techniques § Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air § All Future Metals NL drill holes were diamond core holes, either PQ3 or HQ3
blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or in size. Generally, the top 50 metres (approximately) of the other drill holes
standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, were often also drilled in PQ3 until competent rock was encountered. The drill
whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). hole was then cased off and continued in HQ3 size core drilling.
§ PQ3 core diameter is 83.0mm, HQ3 core diameter is 61.1mm.
§ Future Metals NL drill holes HQ3 core is orientated using a BLY TruCore
UPIX Orientation Tool.
§ Future Metal NLs drilling contractor is Terra Drilling. Triple tubes are
utilised in the weathered horizon (less than 10m) and standard tubes for the
remainder of the drill hole.
Drill sample recovery § Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and § Each core run is measured and checked against the drillers core blocks. Any
results assessed. core loss is noted. To date core recoveries have been excellent with very
little core loss reported.
§ Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature
of the samples. § Exploration drilling is planned to be as close to orthogonal to the
mineralisation as practicable to get representative samples of the
§ Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether mineralisation.
sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
material. § No relationship between recovery and grade has been identified.
Logging § Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically § All drill core samples have been logged onsite by geologists to a level of
logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and
estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. metallurgical studies.
§ Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, § Logging is qualitative and records lithology, grain size, texture,
channel, etc) photography. weathering, structure, alteration, veining and sulphides. Core is digitally
photographed.
§ The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.
§ All holes are logged in full.
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation § If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. § Not applicable - no sampling reported.
§ If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether
sampled wet or dry.
§ For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample
preparation technique.
§ Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
§ Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ
material collected, including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
§ Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material
being sampled.
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests § The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory § No new assay data is reported on in this announcement.
procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.
§ For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the
parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and
model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.
§ Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of
accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.
Verification of sampling and assaying § The verification of significant intersections by either independent or § Primary data: drill hole data, geological logging, sample intervals etc.
alternative company personnel. are all recorded digitally in the field. Maps and cross sections are produced
and the digital data verified.
§ The use of twinned holes.
§ Future Metals NL has established a Datashed database and appropriate
§ Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, protocols.
data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
§ Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Location of data points § Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and § All drill holes were located initially with hand held GPS but then
down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in re-surveyed with a differential GPS system to get locational accuracy's to
Mineral Resource estimation. <0.1m.
§ Specification of the grid system used. § Down hole surveys are taken with a north seeking gyroscope at regular
intervals of 30m down hole in Future Metals NL drill holes.
§ Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
§ Future Metals NL drilling is located using Map Grid of Australia 1994, Zone
52.
§ The topographic control is considered better than <3m and is considered
adequate.
Data spacing and distribution § Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. § Sample Compositing: Not applicable, no sampling reported
§ Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the
degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource
and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.
§ Whether sample compositing has been applied.
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure § Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible § Exploration and resource drilling is designed to be as close to orthogonal
structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit as practicable to the dip and strike of the mineralisation within the Panton
type. Intrusion.
§ If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of
key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias,
this should be assessed and reported if material.
Sample security § The measures taken to ensure sample security. § Not applicable - no sampling reported.
Audits or reviews § The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. § Not applicable - no sampling reported.
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status § Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or § The Panton PGM Project is located on three granted mining licenses M80/103,
material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, M80/104 and M80/105 ('MLs'). The MLs are held 100% by Panton Sill Pty Ltd
overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or which is a 100% owned subsidiary of Future Metals NL.
national park and environmental settings.
§ The MLs were granted on 17 March 1986 and are currently valid until 16
§ The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any March 2028.
known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
§ A 0.5% net smelter return royalty is payable to Elemental Royalties
Australia Pty Ltd in respect of any future production of chrome, cobalt,
copper, gold, iridium, palladium, platinum, nickel, rhodium and ruthenium.
§ A 2.0% net smelter return royalty is payable to Maverix Metals (Australia)
Pty Ltd on any PGMs produced from the MLs.
§ There are no impediments to working in the area.
Exploration done by other parties § Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. § The Panton deposit was discovered by the Geological Survey of Western
Australia from surface mapping conducted in the early 1960s.
§ Pickland Mather and Co. drilled the first hole to test the mafic-ultramafic
complex in 1970, followed by Minsaco Resources which drilled 30 diamond holes
between 1976 and 1987.
§ In 1989, Pancontinental Mining Limited and Degrussa Exploration drilled a
further 32 drill holes and defined a non-JORC compliant resource.
§ Platinum Australia Ltd acquired the project in 2000 and conducted the
majority of the drilling, comprising 166 holes for 34,410 metres, leading to
the delineation of a maiden JORC Mineral Resource Estimate.
§ Panoramic Resources Ltd subsequently purchased the Panton PGM Project from
Platinum Australia Ltd in May 2012 and conducted a wide range of metallurgical
test work programs on the Panton ore.
Geology § Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. § The Panton intrusion is a layered, differentiated mafic to ultramafic body
that has been intruded into the sediments of the Proterozoic Lamboo Complex in
the Kimberley Region of Western Australia. The Panton intrusion has
undergone several folding and faulting events that have resulted in a south
westerly plunging synclinal structure some 10km long and 3km wide.
§ PGM mineralisation is associated with several thin cumulate Chromitite
reefs within the ultramafic sequence. In all there are three chromite
horizons, the Upper group Chromitite (situated within the upper gabbroic
sequence), the Middle group Chromitite (situated in the upper portion of the
ultramafic cumulate sequence) and the Lower group Chromitite (situated toward
the base of the ultramafic cumulate sequence). The top reef mineralised zone
has been mapped over approximately 12km.
§ Exploration drilling described in this announcement is targeting more
conceptual features, particularly an inferred feeder or conduit system to the
layered intrusion and the lowermost ultramafic stratigraphy proximal to such a
structure. These areas, by analogy to other similar intrusions prospective for
sulphide hosted nickel, copper, cobalt and PGE mineralisation. Such bodies of
mineralisation can be semi massive to massive and hence excellent
electromagnetic targets.
Drill hole Information § A summary of all information material to the understanding of the § Details of all drill holes reported in this announcement are provided in
exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for Appendix One.
all Material drill holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of
the drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.
§ If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the
information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why
this is the case.
Data aggregation methods § In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum § Significant intercepts are reported as down-hole length weighted averages
and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off of grades above 0.50g/t PGM(3E) (Pt/Pd/Au). No top cuts have been applied to
grades are usually Material and should be stated. the reporting of the assay results.
§ Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results § 4 metres of internal dilution is allowed in the reported intervals.
and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations § Higher grade intervals are included in the reported grade intervals; and
should be shown in detail. have also been split out on a case-by-case basis where relevant.
§ The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be
clearly stated.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths § These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of § Usually drilling is designed to be as close to orthogonal as practicable to
Exploration Results. the dip and strike of the mineralised chromitite reefs within the Panton
Intrusion.
§ If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle
is known, its nature should be reported. § Refer to the Figures in this announcement showing drill cross sections.
§ If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there
should be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true width
not known').
Diagrams § Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts § Appropriate sections included in the body of this announcement.
should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should
include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and
appropriate sectional views.
Balanced reporting § Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not § All results at hand at the time of this announcement have been reported.
practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or
widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration
Results.
Other substantive exploration data § Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported § No other exploration data is relevant.
including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey
results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical
and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
Further work § The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral § Refer to main text and figures for exploration potential.
extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).
§ Metallurgical test work is on-going.
§ Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including
the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this § Exploration and resource definition drilling will continue in and around
information is not commercially sensitive. the current resource area.
§ Mining, environmental and economic studies are underway
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
. END DRLEADFKFFPAFFARecent news on Future Metals NL
See all newsREG - Future Metals NL - Quarterly Activities Report
AnnouncementREG - AIM - AIM Notice - 24/04/2025
AnnouncementREG - Future Metals NL - Completion of Placement
AnnouncementREG - Future Metals NL - Strategic Infrastructure MOU and Equity Fundraise
AnnouncementREG - Future Metals NL - ASX Trading Halt
Announcement