REG - GreenX Metals Ltd - New High Priority Targets Identified at ELN
14/05/2026 07:00
For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
https://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20260514:nRSN2906Ea&default-theme=true
RNS Number : 2906E GreenX Metals Limited 14 May 2026
NEWS RELEASE 14 MAY 2026
NEW HIGH PRIORITY TUNGSTEN AND ANTIMONY TARGETS IDENTIFIED AT ELEONORE NORTH
HIGHLIGHTS
· New tungsten and antimony targets identified at the Margeries
Prospects in East Greenland following the reprocessing of historical airborne
hyperspectral data, which has revealed multiple zones of hydrothermal
alteration across the licence area
· Multiple walk-up surface anomalies identified along strike and
adjacent to the existing high-grade tungsten (W) and antimony (Sb) historical
estimates previously identified at North Margeries (Sb-W) and South Margeries
(W)
· 2km-long prospectivity anomaly at North Margeries sits adjacent to a
major east-west fault structure, with multiple additional anomalies
surrounding the South Margeries historical estimate
· Targets were generated by applying modern processing techniques to a
heritage dataset acquired from an airborne hyperspectral survey flown in 2000
across the East Greenland Licences
· The 2026 fieldwork will test the new targets and collect bulk
samples at North and South Margeries for tungsten and antimony metallurgical
sighter test work
· Noa Pluton 2026 fieldwork and other gold (Au) targets across Eleonore
North will include field mapping and sampling
· Aim of fieldwork in 2026 is to confirm drill ready targets at both
North and South Margeries and Noa Pluton
GreenX Metals Limited (ASX:GRX, LSE:GRX GPW:GRX, Germany-FSE:A3C9JR) (GreenX
or the Company) is pleased to announce that the reprocessing of a historical
airborne hyperspectral survey has identified multiple new high-priority
tungsten, antimony, and gold targets at the Eleonore North Project in the East
Greenland (ELN or Eleonore North). The new targets sit along strike and
adjacent to the existing high-grade tungsten and antimony historical estimates
identified at North and South Margeries, providing the Company with potential
walk-up surface targets to test during the planned field season, which is
expected to commence in July 2026.
Tungsten and antimony are both listed as critical raw materials by the
European Union and the United States, with global supply heavily concentrated
in China. The Margeries Prospects host high-grade historical estimates of both
metals in a stable Western jurisdiction.
GreenX CEO, Mr Ben Stoikovich, said, "The reprocessing of the historical
hyperspectral data has delivered exactly what we hoped for: new walk-up
tungsten and antimony targets, generated at minimal cost, sitting right
alongside our existing high-grade historical estimates at North and South
Margeries. With the 2026 field season only weeks away, our exploration team
now has a clear pipeline of priority targets to advance on the ground, further
defining and prioritising potential drill targets for future field programs."
Figure 1: Prospectivity analysis by TheiaX highlights new areas for
investigation around Noa Pluton, and North and South Margeries Prospects.
Cautionary statement: The historical estimate in this announcement is not
reported in accordance with the JORC Code 2012 (JORC Code). A competent person
has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as a mineral
resource or ore reserve in accordance with the JORC Code. It is uncertain that
following evaluation and/or further exploration work that the historical
estimate will be able to be reported as a mineral resource or ore reserve in
accordance with the JORC Code.
Figure 2: Location of the airborne hyperspectral survey with examples of
spectral data products. A: False colour composite illustrating the dominant
distribution of four mineral groups. B: Relative abundance of iron in
carbonates and silicates.
Survey background and processing
Flown in 2000, the airborne hyperspectral survey was part of "Project
HyperGreen". The Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS)
commissioned the project, which was financed by Greenland's Bureau of Minerals
and Petroleum. Data acquisition was contracted to HyVista Corporation
(Australia), which used a HyMap system mounted in a Dornier 228 aircraft. Six
flight lines covering 186 line-km produced a survey area with dimensions of
approximately 12 km x 25 km. The survey produced a pixel size of 5 m,
making it high resolution compared to typical satellite surveys, which range
from 15 m to 30 m.
Raw data from the survey has been stored by GEUS and was recently made
available to GreenX. Data processing was completed by TheiaX GmbH (TheiaX) in
Germany. Processing involved converting the raw data from radiance to
reflectance values, orthorectification, mosaicking, spectral index
calculations and culminated in a prospectivity analysis.
Results and prospectivity analysis
The prospectivity analysis identified surface anomalies that share spectral
patterns observed at the known historical estimate occurrences at North and
South Margeries. These prospective areas represent surface anomalies that have
the potential to be walk-up discoveries.
At North Margeries (Figure 1B), a 2 km-long prospectivity anomaly sits 3 km
west of the historical estimate and adjacent to a large east-west fault
structure.
At South Margeries (Figure 1C), multiple prospectivity anomalies surround the
Historical Estimate and likely sit in faults that do not appear in the
1:500,000 scale geological maps.
The anomalies were identified by recognising patterns in spectral indexes
proximal to the known mineral occurrences, then applying those patterns across
the broader licence area. Various spectral index maps were produced during
processing. False colour composites can illustrate the dominant distribution
of mineral groups (Figure 2A). Two band indexes can separately illustrate the
relative abundance of a mineral group or their compositional variation, e.g.,
abundance of iron ± magnesium silicates or compositional variation of those
silicates from iron-rich to magnesium-rich end members. Various one band index
maps were produced to show relative abundance, e.g., iron in carbonates and
silicates (Figure 2B).
Upcoming Work Programs
On the ground fieldwork at ELN is currently being planned to commence in July
2026. The hyperspectral mineral mapping and prospectivity analysis have
provided GreenX with surface targets with the potential for walk-up
discoveries. At Noa Pluton, hyperspectral targets likely have structural
controls that match the Reduced Intrusion-related Gold (Au) System (RIRGS).
At North and South Margeries, the plan is to collect bulk material for sighter
metallurgical test work. The hyperspectral survey has also revealed potential
extensions past areas of historical drilling, which are worthy of
investigation, and will be used to identify potential drill targets.
The Noa Pluton Sb-Au-W prospect will be evaluated by a RIRGS specialist.
Fieldwork to evaluate the RIRGS potential will likely involve mapping and
sampling to identify future drill targets.
Licence reduction
Following a technical review and in accordance with Greenland's mining law,
the northern portion of MEL 2023-39 has been relinquished. This has reduced
the licence area from 1,190 km(2) to 494 km(2) and, as a result, decreased
the minimal annual exploration obligations for MEL 2023-39.
ENQUIRIES
Ben Stoikovich Kazimierz Chojna
Chief Executive Officer Investor Relations - Poland
+44 207 478 3900 Kim Eckhof
ir@greenxmetals.com (mailto:ir@greenxmetals.com) Investor Relations - UK / Germany
Competent Persons Statement - Exploration results
Information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results for the
hyperspectral survey is based on and fairly represents, information and
supporting documentation compiled by Mr Joel Burkin, a Competent Person who is
a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Burkin is a
consultant engaged by GreenX and is a holder of unlisted options in the
Company. Mr Burkin has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of
mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity
being undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012
Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results,
Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr Burkin consents to the inclusion in
this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and
context in which it appears.
The information in this report that relates to previous exploration results
were extracted from the ASX announcements dated 15 July 2024 and 27 November
2024, which are available to view at www.greenxmetals.com
(http://www.greenxmetals.com) . GreenX confirms that (a) it is not aware of
any new information or data that materially affects the information included
in the original announcements; (b) all material assumptions and technical
parameters underpinning the content in the relevant announcements continue to
apply and have not materially changed; and (c) the form and context in which
the Competent Person's findings are presented have not been materially
modified from the original announcements.
Competent Persons Statement - historical estimates
The information in this announcement that relates to the historical estimate
for Eleonore North was extracted from the ASX announcement dated 24 November
2025, titled 'Greenx Targeting Gold, Tungsten & Antimony at Eleonore North
Project in Greenland' (ELN Original Announcement). GreenX confirms that (a) it
is not in possession of any new information or data relating to the historical
estimate that materially impacts on the reliability of the estimates or
GreenX's to verify the historical estimates as mineral resources or ore
reserves in accordance with the JORC Code; (b) that the supporting information
provided in the ELN Original Announcement referred to in ASX Listing Rule 5.12
continues to apply and has not materially changed; and (c) the form and
context in which the Competent Person's findings are presented have not been
materially modified from the ELN Original Announcement.
Forward Looking Statements
This release may include forward-looking statements, which may be identified
by words such as "expects", "anticipates", "believes", "projects", "plans",
and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on
GreenX's expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking
statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors,
many of which are outside the control of GreenX, which could cause actual
results to differ materially from such statements. There can be no assurance
that forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. GreenX makes no
undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements
made in this release, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of
that release.
The information contained within this announcement is deemed to constitute
inside information as stipulated under the Regulation 2014/596/EU which is
part of domestic law pursuant to the Market Abuse (Amendment) (EU Exit)
Regulations (SI 2019/310) ("UK MAR"). By the publication of this announcement
via a Regulatory Information Service, this inside information (as defined in
UK MAR) is now considered to be in the public domain.
JORC Code, 2012 Edition - Table 1 report
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling techniques Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific Data was acquired by the HyVista Corporation (Australia) in 2000 who used a
specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals HyMap spectral system mounted in a Dornier 228 aircraft. Six flight lines
under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF covering 186 line-km produced a survey area with dimensions of approximately
instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad 12 km x 25 km. The survey produced a pixel size of 5 m x 5 m.
meaning of sampling.
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. The raw data was processed by TheiaX Gmbh in the following way:
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public 1. Conversion of the hyperspectral data from radiance to
Report. reflectance;
In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively 2. Orthorectification of the reflectance datacubes;
simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from
which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other 3. Mosaicking six strips into one datacube;
cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold
that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation 4. Spectral index calculation;
types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
5. Prospectivity mapping based on the hyperspectral data.
The results do not represent, substitute, or imply sample assays, grades, or
thicknesses.
GreenX is planning fieldwork that involves visiting the areas identified as
being prospective.
Drilling techniques Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, Remote sensing hyperspectral survey: no drilling was undertaken.
auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard
tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is
oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
Drill sample recovery Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results Remote sensing hyperspectral survey: no drilling was undertaken.
assessed.
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of
the samples.
Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
material.
Logging Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged Remote sensing hyperspectral survey: no drilling was undertaken.
to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation,
mining studies and metallurgical studies.
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
channel, etc) photography.
The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. Remote sensing hyperspectral survey: no drilling was undertaken.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether
sampled wet or dry.
For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample
preparation technique.
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ
material collected, including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being
sampled.
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory No assay data is being reported.
procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the
parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and A HyMap spectrometer was used in this survey. The reflectance datacubes were
model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. orthorectified firstly with an automated process that considers the flight
tracking data (latitude, longitude, elevation, true heading, pitch, roll, and
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, heading) and a 30 m DEM model. Following automated georeferencing, manual
duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of corrections were performed. Both are considered industry standard.
accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.
The spectral indices produced rely on industry standard formulas and are not
substitutes for sampling and assaying.
For the prospectivity analysis, a selection of spectral indices was used to
predict the distance to a subset of known mineralised occurrences. The
method is proprietary to TheiaX GmbH and should be considered subjective.
Verification of sampling and assaying The verification of significant intersections by either independent or Remote sensing hyperspectral survey: verification of assaying and sampling is
alternative company personnel. not applicable.
The use of twinned holes.
Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data
storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Location of data points Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and Remote sensing hyperspectral survey: no drill holes, trenches, mine workings
down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in or other locations used. No Mineral Resource estimation is made.
Mineral Resource estimation.
Specification of the grid system used.
Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
Data spacing and distribution Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. The survey covered an area of approximately 12 km wide by 25 km long. Each
pixel in the processed data covers approximately 5 m x 5 m. It is not possible
Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the to collect data from ground that is in shadow (i.e., in the shade). The
degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource results can be used to interpret surface geology, but are not appropriate and
and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. have not been used to estimate grades or grade continuity. Pixels in the raw
and processed data have not been composited. Additionally, this data should
Whether sample compositing has been applied. not be considered to represent or substitute physical samples.
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible Not applicable to remote sensing exploration results.
structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit
type.
If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of
key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias,
this should be assessed and reported if material.
Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample security. Raw data was received from the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland
(GEUS) who have been custodians of the data since it was collected in 2000.
There are no concerns about data security.
Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. All data was reviewed and processed by TheiaX GmbH, an independent company
that specialises in processing and interpreting spectral data.
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or The Elenore North project comprises of MEL 2018-19 and MEL 2023-39. MEL
material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, 2018-19 covers North Margeries and South Margeries prospects with an official
overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or area of 31.04 km(2). MEL 2023-39 covers the Noa Pluton prospect and has an
national park and environmental settings. official area of 494.263 km(2). The location of both licenses is shown in
Figure 1 in the body of this announcement.
The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known
impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. The licenses are currently in good standing. GreenX owns 100% of the licenses
following the conclusion of a revised option agreement as announced on 15 July
2024. GreenX will issue a 1.5% NSR to Greenfields Exploration.
Exploration done by other parties Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. 1953: Lead, copper and zinc bearing veins were discovered at Noa as part of a
regional mapping program by Nordisk Mineselskab A/G (Nordisk).
1974 - 1976: Nordisk mapped the Holmesø copper-antimony prospect in
Brogetdal, Strindbergland. Geophysical surveying was performed. The
outcropping mineralisation was blasted a 100kg bulk sample was retrieved, of
which 35kg was sent for analysis. Finally, an attempt was made to drill the
mineralisation, and only the top 1.4m of a targeted 17m mineralised horizon
was sampled before the rig broke down. Nordisk concluded that the Holmesø
mineralisation is epigenetic.
1981 - 1983: Nordisk discovered the two small, high-grade tungsten and
antimony-tungsten deposits on Ymer Island. These are respectively known as
South Margeries and North Margeries. These deposits were drilled and
Historical Estimates were made. Economic studies were performed but
concluded that more mineralised material was needed. The drilled
mineralisation is open at depth and along strike.
1984 - 1986: As part of Nordisk's search for more tungsten mineralisation, a
large gold bearing vein was discovered in the southern cliff face of the
valley at Noa. The mineralisation in the scree was sampled. Geochemical
sampling was also performed which identified a 10 to 15 km long multielement
anomaly dominated by arsenic and antimony, which have a positive correlation
with gold. Nordisk had a strategic shift towards petroleum exploration after
this point in time.
1992: With the demise of Nordisk in 1991, the Greenland state owned
enterprise, NunaOil A/S in collaboration with Australia's Pasminco Ltd did
additional sampling of the Noa gold veins. The program was successful in
finding additional veins in the valley floor and extending the known
mineralisation. However, the corporate mandate was for 'high grade gold'
which it was unsuccessful in locating. This result is unsurprising given
that the veins are above the hornfels and correspondingly yield high-grade
antimony and low-gold content.
2000: GEUS commissioned the hyperspectral survey over parts of the license
area as part of a larger HyperGreen project.
2008 - 2009: GEUS visited Ymer Island and took various rock grab samples in
the Noa area. Assay results from these samples were recently made publicly
available on the Greenland Portal.
2009: NunaMinerals A/S, a public-private spinout from NunaOil A/S, conducted a
heliborne magnetic survey over Margeries and Noa. The purpose of this survey
was to directly detect tungsten, and antimony deposits. Neither of the known
deposits were detectable using this method, however a distinct circular
magnetic feature was identified in Noa. This magnetic feature was
interpreted to be a granitic/intermediate intrusion. During this time,
samples from the South Margeries deposit were sent for metallurgical
analysis, which determined that the material was potentially suited to
direct-shipping-ore, and amendable to basic beneficiation methods.
2011: Avannaa Resources Ltd (Avannaa) conducted a basin-wide helicopter
supported reconnaissance program. This included visits to the Holmesø
mineralisation. Avannaa concluded that the Holmesø mineralisation was
epigenetic and likely related to the mineralisation observed on Ymer Island.
2018-2019: Independence Group Ltd (subsequently rebranded as IGO Ltd (IGO)
through a joint-venture agreement with Greenfields Exploration (GEX),
conducted field programs that were focussed on the sedimentary-hosted copper
deposit model. During this time, IGO managed all geological aspects of the
program while GEX managed the logistics in 2018 and 2019. IGO visited Noa in
2018 and 2019 but focussed on the north slope away from the Noa Pluton area.
During the IGO earn-in period, GEX located the historical drillhole collars at
North and South Margeries tungsten/antimony deposits.
2022: IGO conducted a structural and geochemical sampling program in
Strindbergland (area now relinquished - no activity on Ymer Island). This
program concluded that the 'sediment-hosted copper deposit model' is not a
suitable analogy. IGO returned the licences to GEX. Licences were in good
standing.
2023: In May, GEX installed an array of passive seismic nodes on Ymer Island
within the license area. Passive seismic nodes record ambient noise in the
crust and accumulate data over many weeks. In September 2023, GEX collected
the nodes from Ymer Island. The nodes were returned to the Institute of Mine
Seismology (IMS) for data download and processing. IMS produced a 3D velocity
model.
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. The vein-type tungsten and antimony mineralisation at North and South
Margeries occurs in late Precambrian sedimentary rocks of the Eleonore Bay
Group in Central East Greenland, particularly within the Multicoloured Series.
These unmetamorphosed sandstones, siltstones, and limestones form part of a
folded and faulted basin sequence that was later deformed during Caledonian
deformation. The mineralisation is structurally controlled, occurring along
steep, fault-related veins and fracture zones that acted as conduits for
hydrothermal fluids. The ore assemblage is dominated by scheelite and
stibnite, with minor sulphides and quartz, and is commonly associated with
silicification and carbonate alteration of the host rocks.
Drill hole Information A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration No new exploration drilling results are being reported.
results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material
drill holes:
· easting and northing of the drill hole collar
· elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in
metres) of the drill hole collar
· dip and azimuth of the hole
· down hole length and interception depth
· hole length.
If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the
information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why
this is the case.
Data aggregation methods In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum No new exploration drilling results are being reported.
and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off
grades are usually Material and should be stated.
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and
longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation
should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be
shown in detail.
The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be
clearly stated.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration No new exploration drilling results or mineralisation widths are being
Results. reported.
If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is
known, its nature should be reported.
If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should
be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true width not
known').
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts Appropriate maps are included in the main body of this announcement.
should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should
include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and
appropriate sectional views.
Balanced reporting Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, Individual data products from the processed hyperspectral survey are not
representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be material Exploration Results and do not report grades or widths. Two examples
practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. are shown in the main body of this announcement (Figure 2). The prospectivity
analysis (Figure 1) provides potential areas that can be investigated in the
field based on spectral indicators.
Other substantive exploration data Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported All substantive results are reported.
including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey
results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical
and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
Further work The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions The nature and scale of planned further work is included in main body of this
or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). announcement.
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the Figure 1 in the main body of this announcement shows prospective areas for
main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this follow up in the field.
information is not commercially sensitive.
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
. END DRLAIMBTMTJBMFF
Copyright 2019 Regulatory News Service, all rights reservedRecent news on GreenX Metals
See all newsREG - GreenX Metals Ltd - New High Priority Targets Identified at ELN
AnnouncementREG - GreenX Metals Ltd - Quarterly Activities Report March 2026
AnnouncementREG - Civil Aviation Auth. - DRAFT DECISION ON EXPANSION EARLY COSTS RECOVERY
AnnouncementREG - GreenX Metals Ltd - A$1.6m Received for Legal Costs from Poland
AnnouncementREG - GreenX Metals Ltd - Issue of Shares
Announcement