RCS - Wetherspoon (JD) PLC - Pubs Need Tax Equality, Not Tax Complexity

J D WetherspoonAnnouncement

Yesterday 11:00

For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
https://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20250909:nRSI6129Ya&default-theme=true

RNS Number : 6129Y  Wetherspoon (JD) PLC  09 September 2025

Released 9(th) September 2025

 

J D WETHERSPOON PC

 

Pubs Need Tax Equality, Not Tax Complexity

 

by Tim Martin, 9(th) September 2025

 

The entire hospitality industry is united in its view that pubs, clubs and
restaurants pay wildly excessive taxes, especially VAT and business rates, in
comparison with supermarkets.

 

This tax disparity is harming businesses and high streets, but also the social
fabric of the nation - where, other than pubs, can you temporarily escape the
attentions of your own family?

 

Supermarkets pay zero VAT in respect of food sales, whereas pubs and
restaurants pay 20%, enabling supermarkets, in effect, to subsidise the
selling price of beer, wine and spirits.

 

A consequent anomaly is that food for posh dinner parties in Notting Hill
or the Cotswolds is VAT-free, whereas fish and chips at your local pub
attracts the full 20%. Just ask Jeremy Clarkson.

 

As a result of these perverse tax incentives, as investment bank Morgan
Stanley recently reported, pubs have lost approximately 50% of their beer
trade to supermarkets since the millennium, having lost a substantial amount
even before then.

 

Unfortunately, VAT is not the only hospitality disadvantage. Pubs also pay
about 20 times more business rates per pint than supermarkets. Something
underhand is afoot.

 

Here's how this faulty system works.

 

The explanation is just about complicated enough, so that few people in the
government, and maybe even in the Treasury, really understand the details -
and therefore the enormous hospitality disadvantage.

 

The Rateable Value of any business is set by the Valuation Office Agency
(VOA), and is equal to the yearly rent the property could have been let for on
the open market.

 

For a pub, this is something called the 'market rent', which is typically
around 10-12% of a pub's annual turnover.

 

The Rateable Value is then multiplied by the "National Non-Domestic Rate
Multiplier"- the NDRM. For 2025/26 the multiplier is 0.555.

 

Therefore, a typical pub pays business rates calculated as 0.555 x 10% = 5.6%
of its annual turnover.

 

So a pub with sales of £600,000 per annum (less than half the Wetherspoon
average) will pay business rates of £33,600 - 5.6% of £600,000 equals
£33,600.

 

Put another way, for every £1 of sales, a pub will pay business rates of
5.6p. That's 28p on every £5 pint of beer - approximately the average price
of a pint these days.

 

Let's now compare this with the business rates supermarkets pay.

 

Back in December 2020, Reuters reported that Asda would "pay business rates of
£340m… to the UK government… waiving tax relief."

 

Asda's sales were about £23bn in that year, so the business rates payable
were just under 1.5% of sales, meaning a £5 pint cost them only 8p.

 

Unfortunately, the tax disparity per pint between pubs and supermarkets is
much worse than that.

 

With their much lower overheads, the average pint of beer bought from a
supermarket will be far, far less than £5 - maybe as little as £1 a pint,
meaning a business rate 'levy' of only 1.5p.

 

So, 1.5p in a supermarket versus 28p in a pub… which is nearly 20 TIMES
more.

 

Trade organisation UK Hospitality, acting on behalf of the industry, has made
a strong case for reducing hospitality taxes, in its heroic campaign to reduce
the business rate multiplier.

 

Unfortunately, this sensible and easy-to-understand approach risks being
undermined by a recent, well-meaning suggestion from Greene King, which argues
that business rates should be based on profits, rather than sales.

 

However, this would surely create a nightmare of complexity.

 

Agreeing with government valuation officers a Rateable Value based on the
market rent on average, or "hypothetical", sales is complex enough - but
substituting profits for sales involves far more complex calculations, and
it's hard to see how this could benefit publicans, or indeed the government.

 

Government valuation officers, and those who negotiate with them on behalf of
pubs, have built up a substantial body of knowledge, based on local pub sales
comparisons.

 

Reverting to a profits-based analysis would require a huge educational
programme, in effect creating a massive increase in demand for tax advisors,
which is surely every citizen's nightmare.

 

As things stand today, the valuation officers' primary task, in concert with
their pub counterparts, is to estimate the annual sales of a pub on which the
market rent is based - that is to say, one number only.

 

However, a system based on profits is infinitely more complex - the
Wetherspoon profit and loss account, for example, has 170 different lines,
mostly representing costs, which differ from pub to pub.

 

In reality, it would be all-but-impossible to agree these costs for every pub
in the land.

 

We are sure that Greene King's heart is in the right place, especially since
they brew the sainted Abbot Ale, but feel they've wandered off course, perhaps
after a heavy session, by recommending a profits-based analysis.

 

Finally, when Jacques Borel campaigned, a few years ago, in the UK for a
fairer VAT rate for pubs, clubs and restaurants, which he had successfully
obtained in many other European countries, the industry was disunited.

 

Ted Tuppen of Enterprise Inns and Rooney Anand of Greene King, for example,
refused to support Jacques' campaign.

 

A disunited industry ended up paying far higher VAT than almost any other
European country - as the table from The Scottish Hospitality Group, below,
illustrates.

 

The lesson is: Keep It Simple, Stupid. It's a basic principle that taxes
should be fair and equitable. All we're asking for is equality with
supermarkets, which are doing an excellent job for their customers - the same
rate of VAT and the same business rates per pint.

 

That way, of course, the government will collect more taxes in the end, as
there will be a more successful hospitality industry, more employment, more
vibrant town centres and less vacant shops and pubs.

 

Tax equality equates to sensible economic policies - and we are sure that the
entire nation will drink to that.

 

This information is provided by Reach, the non-regulatory press release distribution service of RNS, part of the London Stock Exchange. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
 or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.

RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
.   END  NRASSESUUEISELU