Daily Stock Market Report (Mon 27th July 2026) - PINE, QTX, VOD, PHAR/SQZ, SWG, VSVS, EMAN, CWK

Oil: there have been two nights in a row without any US attacks on Iran, and Iran for its part has said that it has stopped retaliating. The US Ambassador to the UN says that President Trump is “giving the talks some space”. It seems that negotiations are taking place behind the scenes.

The financial result of all this is a nice big drop in the oil price to start the week, down about $6 compared to where it was last Friday morning. It’s still about $17 higher than it was before the conflict started.

Stocks like the news too, with the S&P 500 set to open up by 1%, and the FTSE also due to tick higher this morning.

Shein: the Chinese “fast fashion” company, headquartered in Singapore, is preparing to IPO in Hong Kong. The timetable is unclear yet, but this should be of interest to Boohoo/ASOS fans. The company’s latest filing shows that it swung to a quarterly loss after the US increased duties on small imported packages. The EU has just done the same thing, in a move that was clearly (in my view) targeted at companies like Shein and Temu.

Overnight market movements:

• The FTSE is up 0.3% at 10,770

• S&P 500 is up 1% at 7,480

• Brent crude (October) is down 5% at $87.10/bbl

• Gold is up 1% at $4,090/oz

• Bitcoin is up 1.3% at $65,450

---

---

Companies Reporting

---

Graham's Section

Quartix Technologies (LON:QTX)

Down 2.5% at 246.7p (£120m) - Interim Results - Graham - AMBER/GREEN =

Quartix Technologies plc (AIM:QTX), a leading supplier of subscription-based vehicle tracking systems, analytical software and services, is pleased to announce its unaudited results for the half year ended 30 June 2026.

We’ve been following this telematics company for a long time. Unfortunately it has been several years since the share price saw a new high:

In April, Roland lowered our stance on Quartix to AMBER/GREEN on signs of slightly slower customer acquisition in Q1, although the trading update at that time was in line with expectations.

Today’s interim results again say that the Board is “confident in delivering market expectations for the current year in respect of revenue, Adjusted EBIT and free cash flow.”

This continues the recent trend of stable EPS forecasts, which previously saw a nice upgrade cycle:

Turning to the H1 highlights:

• Revenue +12% (£19.4m)

• Adj. EBIT +21% (£4.9m)

• PBT +21% (£4.9m)

Note the very clean conversion from adjusted EBIT to statutory PBT: no funny business and no significant finance charges.

Cash on the balance sheet is £4.8m, with no borrowings.

That cash balance has fallen since December 2025 (£5.6m), so it’s worth checking why. The reason is clear from the cash flow statement: dividends paid of £3.6m, which exceeded free cash flow (£3m).

Dividends continue to increase, with a new interim dividend of 2.7p (interim dividend last year: 2.5p).

Turning to Key performance indicators:

• Annualised recurring revenue + 11% to £38.9m

• Fleet subscription base (number of vehicle tracking units) +7% to 343,000.

• ARR per vehicle up 3%

In simple English: there has been a modest 3% increase in pricing per vehicle tracked, combined with 7% growth in the number of vehicles tracked. The 3% pricing increase includes an inflationary price adjustment plus an upsell to dashcams.

Chairman comment (Andy Walters is also the largest shareholder):

"The Group has delivered a strong financial performance in the first half, with solid growth in revenue, profit and free cash flow. This reflects the strength of our subscription‑based model, disciplined pricing and increasing upsell momentum across our customer base. The second half has started well, and with targeted investment in our upsell capabilities and customer acquisition we look to the remainder of the year and 2027 with confidence."

Estimates from Cavendish have been reiterated and include:

• Revenue growth of about 13% this year and 8% next year.

• Adj. PBT of £10.1m this year and £10.9m next year.

• Adj. EPS of 16.3p this year and 17.6p next year.

Graham’s view

I’m inclined to think that this offers decent value at 14x next year’s forecast earnings.

There have been concerns in the past around telematics pricing: the technology is getting cheaper all the time, and this has undoubtedly held back revenue growth at Quartix.

In the short-term, however, pricing is standing firm and is even rising a little.

If the stock was priced in SaaS terms, it would be very cheap at only 3x ARR.

Considering the deflation in the sector, however, it’s probably more logical to value it on a multiple of earnings.

The positives: it offers excellent quality metrics (see below), and I have no concerns about the balance sheet or management. It’s always reassuring to have the founder and major shareholder at the top of the company.

The question marks: I think it comes down to whether you view the prospective revenue growth rates are sufficiently appealing, and how you think Quartix will be able to handle ongoing deflation in the telematics business.

Personally, I don’t have a strong conviction in the answers to these questions, but I am leaning towards a positive view: I think the current double-digit revenue growth is not to be sniffed at, for what is now a reasonably mature business.

As for our stance on the stock, I agree with Roland’s previous AMBER/GREEN.

---

Vesuvius (LON:VSVS)

Down 13.5% at 391p (£970m) - Trading Statement - Graham - BLACK (AMBER/RED ↓)

This brief trading update has caused quite a blow to the Vesuvius share price:

Trading profit for H1 2026 is expected to be c. £74m. Since our trading update on 28 May 2026, we have continued to be impacted by operational issues in our Steel division. Additionally, Advanced Refractories is experiencing a challenging trading environment, particularly in Europe. The operational issues, whilst temporary, are causing a greater impact than previously anticipated. They are being addressed and are expected to be resolved by the end of the year. Accordingly, we now expect full-year trading profit to be slightly ahead of trading profit for FY25 on a constant currency basis.

For context, trading profit last year (FY December 2025) was £151.1m.

Trading profit is what Vesuvius calls adjusted operating profit.

Checking last year’s results, I see that FY25 was itself a pretty poor year, compared to what the company had previously achieved. They said that 2025 was a “challenging year with difficult end market conditions, particularly in EU+UK”.

In their outlook statement, they predicted that 2026 would “mark a transition to recovery in the Steel and Foundry markets, with, in particular, the impact of trade protection measures in Steel starting to have a meaningful impact on our Steel markets as from the latter part of the year”.

Unfortunately, that recovery has not materialised, as the “extended weakness in our end markets” has continued.

Graham’s view

This is not a stock I look at very often. The last time appears to have been a trading statement in May 2025, when the market cap was £930m (today: £970m).

At the time, I kept our neutral stance unchanged, noting very limited growth.

Going into today’s trading update, the market was only expecting the company to achieve modest revenue growth of about 3% in the current year. It seems that this will now not be achieved.

The way that I mentally categorise VSVS is as a very heavy industrial stock: it’s a “global leader in molten metal flow engineering and technology”, providing various products to foundries, furnaces and other industrial processes.

These stocks typically do not trade at high multiples. In the case of Vesuvius, it was at 11x last night:

I think that trading profit was supposed to grow at c. 14% this year. If instead we only get 1% growth, that’s a c. 11% cut to the earnings forecast. So I think the 13% drop in the share price is fair.

As for our stance on the stock, I will turn AMBER/RED in the short-term, consistent with our philosophy that profit warnings are often followed by more profit warnings. Although fundamentally, on a long-term view, I do think that the current valuation is probably fair. This stock does not excite me very much, I must admit!

---

Roland's Section

Pinewood Technologies (LON:PINE)

Up 34% at 421p (£484m) - Joint Statement Regarding a Possible Offer - Roland - TAKEOVER

This RNS statement from automotive dealership software group Pinewood.AI was actually published at 6.45pm on Friday, well after the market closed. Here are the key details:

• Bidder: Ridgeview Partners LLC, a US private equity firm founded in 2024

• Possible cash offer of 448p per PINE share (valuing Pinewood at c.£545m)

• Major shareholder support: shareholders representing 48.7% of Pinewood shares have indicated their support for the offer. Supporters include Lithia Motors (NYQ:LAD) (31.95%), the dealership group that purchased Pinewood’s UK dealers (Pendragon) and with which it is working closely in the US.

• Possible rollover alternative: if the offer proceeds, shareholders wanting to remain invested would be offered the chance to retain an interest in a Cayman Island company incorporated for this purpose. This would be subject to various constraints and limited to c.£250m of Pinewood shares. Friday’s RNS notes that shareholders “would have limited information rights” unless they held a 25% interest. In other words, any private investors choosing this option would probably be kept in the dark regarding performance and would likely be unable to sell their shares until Ridgeview decided to sell Pinewood. 32.8% of shareholders are reported to have indicated that they would choose the Rollover Alternative. I would speculate that this might include Lithia.

A done deal? Given the level of support from major shareholders, I think this offer is almost certain to succeed, assuming Ridgeview decides to make a firm offer.

It’s certainly true that a cash offer of 448p represents a significant premium to the recent share price:

• 43% premium to the undisturbed closing price of 314p on 23 July 2026;

• 53% premium to the volume-weighted average price of 293p over the last month;

• 64% premium to the volume-weighted average price of 274p over the last three months.

However, 448p is a number that shareholders have seen before over the last year:

Pinewood shares topped 500p last year when the company issued a solid set of half-year results and optimistic-sounding medium-term profit guidance for FY28.

Failed 500p bid: despite this, broker forecasts were trimmed and the stock drifted lower until the start of 2026, when private equity group Apex Partners was in discussions with the firm regarding a possible offer of 500p per share.

Unfortunately, Apex decided not to make an offer in February “in the light of the prevailing challenging market conditions”.

Shortly after this, Pinewood issued a profit warning:

That brings us to the end of last week.

Is 448p a fair price?

Ridgeview’s possible cash offer of 448p is more than 10% below the failed Apex bid. Is this a fair price, given the decline in near-term profit expectations since the start of this year?

Broker Zeus has been publishing its coverage on Research Tree, making it the only one of Pinewood’s brokers whose coverage is available to private investors.

The latest Zeus forecasts are from April, when the company cut its estimates to reflect the company’s latest guidance on implementation timing:

• FY26E adj EPS: 8.1p

• FY27E adj EPS: 14.3p

• FY28E adj EPS: 31.0p

Friday’s possible offer thus values Pinewood on a FY26E P/E of 55, falling to a FY28E P/E of 14.5.

Roland’s view

Based on my simplistic review above, I would say that the fairness of Ridgeview’s offer depends on how confident investors are that the company can achieve current FY28 forecasts.

This is purely speculation, but I wonder if this offer is as much about Lithia as it is about Ridgeview. As a reminder, Pinewood is currently rolling out its systems across Lithia’s US dealership business (>300 dealers nationwide).

If (as I am guessing) Lithia accepts the rollover offer, it might be able to secure a 25% interest in the unlisted business, giving it a seat on the board together with a supportive private owner who has purchased the business at what I’d suggest is a very reasonable price.

Pinewood could then get on with its rollout, away from the public eye, before being refloated or sold to another owner in a few years when earnings could be significantly higher, generating a nice return for both Lithia and Ridgeview.

Once again, this is only speculation on my part.

What does seem true to me is that this offer is likely to succeed, potentially without much competitive pressure.

I can imagine that shareholders with confidence in the long-term prospects of the business may feel short changed by this bid and I have some sympathy with this view.

While I think there’s some risk the large-scale US rollout could take longer than expected, fundamentally I think this looks quite a nice business to own. Once installed in a large dealer network, I’d imagine Pinewood’s software will be very sticky and could generate high-margin recurring revenues.

Unfortunately, it probably doesn’t much matter what retail investors like us think – a small number of large holders are likely to decide the outcome of this situation.

---

Vodafone (LON:VOD)

Up 4.5% at 120p (£27.1bn) - Q1 FY27 Trading Update - Roland - AMBER/GREEN =

The headline from today’s first-quarter update is that FY27 results are expected to be at the upper end of guidance.

The reality seems to be that while Q1 trading does look healthy to me, today’s upgrade was already expected and is being driven by the company’s recent acquisition of a controlling stake in its Kenyan Safaricom business for €1.36bn. Safaricom owns the M-Pesa mobile money business, in addition to its mobile network operations.

Today’s updated FY27 guidance includes specific information on the contribution expected from Safaricom this year, now that it’s fully consolidated into the group’s accounts.

Here’s a summary of Vodafone’s Q1 performance (April-June 2026):

• Total revenue up 9.7% to €10.3bn, with 5.2% organic growth and an additional contribution from the full consolidation of Three UK (Vodafone now owns 100% of this former JV)

• Adj EBITDAaL +6.7% to €2.9bn (+6.2% organic)

• Operating profit: rose by €2.9bn to €3.9bn for the first quarter, but this is mainly due to an accounting gain arising from the Safaricom transaction. In this case, I’d say Q1 adj EBITDAaL growth is a more useful metric of performance (despite the horror of this heavily-adjusted metric!).

Divisional performance:

• Germany: service revenue rose by 1.2% (Q4: 1.3%) in the group’s largest single-country market. Management reports higher wholesale and fixed line revenue, reflecting growth in consumer broadband average revenue per user and in business services. Mobile remains under “competitive pressure”.

• UK: organic service revenue +0.6%, excluding the benefit of the consolidation of Three UK. Continued momentum in Consumer Broadband and Business fixed line services.

• Other Europe & Turkey: organic service revenue +1.0%, aided by strong business growth.

• Africa: continued double-digit service revenue growth, with Q1 +12.6% (Q4: +10.9%). Strong growth in both connectivity and financial services.

• Business service revenue: corporate customers are a key growth target for the business. Organic service revenue in this division rose by 5% in Q1 (Q4 +3.2%), “with high double digit-growth in digital services due to strong demand for our SaaS2, IoT and cloud & security products.”.

Outlook

Our guidance for the year now includes the impact of consolidating Safaricom with Group Adjusted EBITDAaL expected to be €13.0 - €13.3 billion and Adjusted free cash flow expected to be €2.6 - €2.9 billion. We now expect to deliver the upper end of our updated Group guidance ranges.

Consolidating Safaricom from 1 July is expected to add €1.1bn to EBITDAaL on a nine-month basis. This acquisition isn’t expected to have any impact on group free cash flow.

Vodafone’s previous FY27 guidance was for adj EBITDAaL of €11.9-12.2bn, so we can see that today’s increase is entirely due to the additional contribution from Safaricom. There seems to be no change to the expected performance of the remainder of the business.

Roland’s view

I was broadly positive on Vodafone in May and am going to retain that view today. While the shares are not quite as cheap as they were a year ago, I think the valuation remains reasonable – today’s free cash flow guidance equates to a FCF yield of c.9%, albeit this is an adjusted figure.

More broadly, I think the business is moving in the right direction and that CEO Margherita Della Valle may yet achieve her goal of improving the group’s return on capital.

Of course, as things stand ROCE remains far too low to cover the group’s cost of capital – failure to improve this over time could see equity value erode, as has happened in the past:

Another possible concern is that net debt is expected to remain relatively high, in a range of 2.25-2.75x adj EBITDAaL.

While I’d personally like to see this lower, I recognise that a near-utility business of this kind can support this level of leverage without too much risk.

The StockRanks have a Neutral styling for Vodafone, with a weak QualityRank holding back what would otherwise be a pretty strong factor profile:

This reflects my view too – I think AMBER/GREEN is a fair view in these circumstances.

---

Shearwater (LON:SWG)

Up 21% at 55p (£13.4m) - FY26 Trading Update - Roland - AMBER/GREEN =

Shares in this micro-carp cybersecurity, advisory and managed security services group are up by more than 20% as I type, following today’s ahead of expectations year-end trading update:

Looked at differently, the shares are still lower than they were a year ago! Cynicism aside, momentum does seem to be improving here, with a number of recent contract win announcements (e.g. here).

FY26 trading: key points

Today’s update covers the year to 30 June 2026. Management reports “a strong trading performance in H2”, driven by continued growth in Services and recent contract wins.

As a result, revenue and adjusted EBITDA are now anticipated to be ahead of expectations:

• Revenue is now expected to be c.£42m, an increase of c.33% year-on-year and 18% above previous consensus of £35.5m.

• Adj EBITDA is now expected to be £2.5m, an year-on-year increase of 41%. This is 4% above previous consensus of £2.4m.

• Year-end net cash of £5.6m (FY25: £5.1m)

• The Board plans to seek shareholder approval for a reallocation of capital between reserves in order to allow dividends and/or buybacks.

FY27 outlook:

The Group enters FY27 with positive momentum, supported by continued demand for its cybersecurity services and a strong pipeline of opportunities. The Board remains confident in the Group's prospects for the year ahead.

Revised broker estimates

Thanks to Cavendish and Research Tree, we have access to updated forecasts this morning.

• FY26E adj EPS: 4.9p (+9% vs 4.5p previously)

• FY27E adj EPS: 5.9p (prev. 5.8p)

Cavendish suggests its current FY27 forecasts could be “a basis from which to outperform” and maintains its 90p price target.

Roland’s view

Following this morning’s rise, Shearwater trades on a FY27 P/E of c.10.

I haven’t looked at this business before but my initial impression is that the share price is playing catch up with recent good news but may now be up with events, at least for a period.

Even using the latest adjusted forecast numbers, this business only appears to be generating an operating margin of c.3% and single-digit returns on capital.

The current FY27 forecasts may well be upgraded over the next year, but then again they may not. I’d need to do more research to understand the prospects and expected run-off from the existing order book.

My view appears to be reflected by the StockRanks, which are neutral:

Shearwater’s small size and lack of liquidity means I would be cautious about going into this business in any size unless I had a thorough understanding and strong conviction of its growth prospects. The group’s track record of profitability is very mixed:

However, recent positive momentum does seem encouraging and Shearwater’s valuation falls to a single-digit P/E when net cash is considered – around 40% of the market cap. This should provide a decent margin of safety to support the equity.

Mark was AMBER/GREEN on this business in February at a share price of 50p. I’m going to give Shearwater the benefit of the doubt and leave that view unchanged today, ahead of further updates from the company.