Daily Stock Market Report (Thur 30th July 2026) - RR., LORD, ASAI, VANQ, WJG, FNTL, BATS, SYS1

Fed interest rate decision: there was no change to US interest rates last night, with a vote of 9-3 in favour of leaving rates unchanged. The FOMC statement was identical to the prior month.

Chairman Kevin Warsh has attempted to say as little as possible about his own views on the need to raise rates in the short-term. He did vote to hold rates in yesterday’s meeting, along with the majority of his FOMC colleagues.

In last night’s press conference, this was the closest he came to expressing a view, and it was again non-committal. He again emphasised that interest rates would be just one potential tool:

“If inflation continues to be elevated through the forecast period, interest rates could well be part of that solution, but I wouldn’t say it’s in isolation.”

The core CPE price index, the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation, is currently running at 3.4%, stubbornly higher than their 2% target.

Brent crude oil: this has risen $4 since yesterday morning, after the US hit a wide range of Iranian targets and LNG tankers were attacked off Egypt’s coast.

Bank of England: no change to rates is expected at the BoE today but it will be interesting to see how the vote splits. Two of the nine members of the MPC can be expected to vote for rate hikes, but a couple more may join them. UK inflation in June was measured at 2.6%.

Overnight market movements:

• The FTSE is down 0.7% at 10,820

• S&P 500 is up 0.2% at 7,340

• Brent crude (October) is up 1.1% at $89.00/bbl

• Gold is down 0.7% at $4,035/oz

• Bitcoin is up 0.8% at $64,000

---

Mark Simpson joins me today.

Calling it there, thanks! Spreadsheet accompanying this report: link.

---

Companies Reporting

---

Graham's Section

ASA International (LON:ASAI)

Down 11% at 230p (£222m) - Q2 2026 Business Update - Graham - GREEN =

(At the time of writing, Graham has a long position in ASAI.)

ASA International Group plc (LSE: ASAI), one of the world's largest international microfinance institutions, today provides a business operations update for the three-month period ended 30 June 2026.

ASAI is a stock I’ve been quite excited about this year. I’ve been pulled in by the earnings multiple:

Even after today’s sell-off, it’s still up healthily year-to-date:

Let’s check out today’s Q2 update.

Highlights:

• Outstanding loan portfolio up 12% year-on-year, surpassing $600m

This sounds good but it's true that prior growth rates were much faster: in 2025, for example, growth was 33%. In the Q1 update, year-on-year growth had moderated to 25%. Today’s Q2 update shows growth moderating further still. The quarterly growth rate was just 4% - perfectly good for many businesses, but slow in the context of ASAI’s recent progress.

• Client base up 11% year-on-year excluding India

Especially considering that this excludes India, the growth in the client base is therefore lagging loan portfolio growth by a few percentage points.

A simple conclusion is that average loan sizes are increasing. Remember that loan sizes here are tiny: the average outstanding amount per client is a little over $200, with the average initial loan size being $347. It makes sense that loan sizes should gradually increase over time, and I think that’s happening here.

• PAR >30 (GN note: portfolio at risk, more than 30 days due) of 2.4% vs. 2.0% a year ago

PAR>30 was 2.4% as at 30 June 2026 compared to 2.0% as at 30 June 2025, which remains industry-leading. One of the main drivers was the introduction of new trade regulations in Uganda which negatively affected clients.

I’d be more concerned about this if ASAI was a marginally profitable lender. But that’s not the case: net interest margin was 39.3% in 2025. Speaking roughly, this represents a huge spread between the yield the company earns on its loans, and the interest it pays on its borrowings. Net interest income was $244m, while total operating expenses were $143m.

In that context, a slight tick-up of 0.4% in the portfolio at risk (PAR) doesn’t worry me much. The company has the profit margin to absorb it. And 2.4% is not a bad number in its own right. In 2024 the PAR was 2.2% and the company was highly profitable despite being significantly smaller then, compared to today.

• Digital platform live in Tanzania, rollout underway in Kenya and Nigeria.

• India Gross OLP brought down 86% year-on-year to USD 4.3m as operations are wound down.

It’s a good thing that Indian operations have been wound down so quickly, when the decision was made to exit.

Indians simply have too many other good options when it comes to accessing credit. It’s an important reminder that as economies develop, there eventually comes a time when the microfinance model is no longer competitive.

CEO comment:

"We are hugely proud of the resilience demonstrated by our clients, and consequently by our loan portfolio, given the challenging circumstances seen across many of our markets. ASA International delivered both resilience and growth in the second quarter, which supports our positive expectations for the second half of 2026.

"While we remain mindful of ongoing geopolitical developments, we are encouraged by the momentum seen across key markets including Pakistan, Ghana and Kenya. Combined with our industry-leading portfolio quality, continued progress in our digital transformation agenda and the further reduction of our exposure to India, we believe ASA International is well positioned to execute on its strategy to deliver sustainable growth."

(I’m glad he went for “sustainable growth” rather than “profitable growth”!)

Looking through the tables, I see that quarterly growth in the number of clients was just 1% (excluding India), and quarterly growth in the loan portfolio (also excluding India) was 4%. The main differences I can between the regions are:

1. Fast year-on-year growth in South Asia and East Africa compared to the other regions (Southeast Asia and West Africa)

2. PAR is highest in Southeast Asia (4.9%) and very low in South Asia (0.6%).

Graham’s view

I can understand why there has been some selling today, given the weaker growth and the increase in the portfolio at risk.

However, I think it’s worth pointing out that market expectations already suggested that growth would be much more limited this year:

Lending is always a risky business, and rapidly growing lenders can be prone to serious mishaps. I do not have any problem with the company taking a small pause in its growth trajectory. It’s still vastly bigger than it was just two years ago.

Also, when I look into the details, I see that recent growth has been concentrated in an area with very low and falling PAR (South Asia). At the same, ASAI grew at the slowest pace in Q2 in the area with highest PAR. (Southeast Asia). That is logical: grow fast where it is safer, grow slowly where it is less safe.

I’m going to stay GREEN on this today, as I don’t think today’s update changes anything fundamentally about the investment case here. And I think the risks are priced in at a P/E multiple of around 4x. Of course it could be argued that I’m talking my own book!

Stockopedia rates it as a Turnaround. I do think this low QualityRank is a little unfair:

---

Watkin Jones (LON:WJG)

Up 1% at 18.2p (£47m) - Q3 update - Graham - AMBER/GREEN =

Watkin Jones plc, the UK's leading developer and manager of residential for rent, provides the following update on trading for the three months to 30 June 2026 ("Q3").

Times have been tough for WJG:

We’ve been moderately positive on it, due to the discount to book value which the stock offers. At the end of H1 (March 2026), it reported adjusted net cash of £61m and had tangible balance sheet equity of £114m, both figures being significantly higher than the current market cap.

Today’s Q3 update:

Whilst the geopolitical and economic backdrop continues to impact both confidence and liquidity in our key markets, the Group remains focused on execution and the factors within our control. This includes successfully delivering our in-build projects in line with stated margin guidance and carefully managing our costs and cash, in particular with further earlier procurement of selected sub-contract packages and materials to mitigate inflationary pressures.

“Controlling the controllables", in other words.

Six new contracts worth £60m have been signed so far in H2, but I wouldn’t be very confident in predicting the profits that might flow from these over time.

In H1, the company’s operating profit was around breakeven on total revenues of £100m. WJG says that the margins on the new contracts are “in line with guidance”.

Five of the contracts are in the Refresh division, providing remediation, fire safety, refurbishment and asset improvement works to existing Purpose Built Student Accommodation.

This sounds like a clear warning that full-year expectations might be missed:

The Group is actively engaged with investors on a small number of transactions which have the potential to conclude in the final quarter and completion of which are required to deliver adjusted operating profit progression in the second half over the first half. The Board is mindful that the effects of ongoing economic and political uncertainty on real estate funding liquidity represent ongoing risk to the timing and completion of these transactions.

With H1 operating profit only around breakeven, and with market expectations calling for material full-year profits (e.g. the net income forecast on the StockReport is £3.5m), a significant improvement in H2 is absolutely necessary in order for these expectations to be met. Based on the above statement, I would assume there is at least a 50% chance of a profit warning.

Graham’s view

Despite my lack of confidence in the ability of the company to hit forecasts, I’m inclined to leave our AMBER/GREEN stance unchanged here. My reasoning is simple: our AMBER/GREEN stance, at least as far as I’m concerned, is a view on the balance sheet, not earnings.

If the market had confidence in the ability of WJG to hit profit forecasts, its share price wouldn’t be down by 40% year-to-date. It wouldn’t be trading at a discount to net cash and at less than half of net assets.

So the current difficulties re: profitability are already priced in, I think. From here, it’s a question of how long the recovery might take and whether the share price has been sufficiently discounted to account for the risks involved..

With the company trading so cheaply and still having the potential for a breakeven result this year, or hopefully a small profit, I am fine with retaining our moderately positive stance.

I’m not surprised to see this show up on one of the “Bargain Stocks” screens:

---

Mark's Section

Rolls-Royce Holdings (LON:RR.)

Up 5% at 1450p (£115bn) - 2026 Half Year Results - Mark - AMBER/GREEN ↑

When I previewed these interim results on The Week Ahead, I pointed out that the Value Rank had dropped to a very low level and that:

It remains a high flyer, but the pressure is now on to deliver numbers that lead to further upgrades to maintain the upward trajectory.

Thankfully, they are delivering, as in today’s results, they say:

Full year 2026 guidance raised; we now expect £4.7bn-£4.9bn underlying operating profit and £3.8bn-£4.0bn free cash flow.

They had previously guided £4.0bn-£4.2bn of underlying operating profit and £3.6bn-£3.8bn of free cash flow, so this is a sizable 17% upgrade, mid-point to mid-point.

H1 Results:

Importantly, this outlook is backed by a strong H1 reported today:

• Underlying operating profit rose by 46% to £2.5bn; underlying operating margin of 22.5% with higher profitability in all divisions reflecting the impact of our strategic initiatives and operational improvements

• Free cash flow of £2.0bn driven by higher underlying operating profit and with increased investments to support profitable growth to the mid-term and beyond

This is over half of the full-year guidance delivered in H1, for a business with a historically slight H2 weighting (over the last three years, the H2 weighting has been 51%, 55% and 58% for underlying operating profit). This suggests that they may be holding something back for further upgrades during the year.

Adjustments:

Whenever a business is going through a "transformation programme”, it pays to look at the exceptional costs, as many companies would like investors to give management credit for the cost savings but exclude the costs of achieving them.

Here, the figures look reasonable, and the gap between statutory and adjusted figures is relatively small:

Statutory operating profit was £2.4bn, compared to underlying operating profit of £2.5bn. The £116m lower statutory operating profit is primarily due to a £(117)m pension past service charge, £(28)m transformation and restructuring charges, £(8)m amortisation of intangible assets from previous acquisitions, partly offset by £37m positive impact from currency hedges.

While a £28m restructuring charge would be very material in many places, here it is just 1.1% of adjusted operating profit, given the overall scale of the business. That this is reasonable is backed up by the cash flow, with trading cash flow coming in pretty close to adjusted operating profit.

There continues to be a modest amount of pension recovery payments made, but again, these are far from material, overall:

Trading cash flow also shows improvement across all three major divisions, indicating the strength of delivery is broad-based.

Key aspects:

When I previewed these results, I suggested four key things that investors may want to review in these results: Civil Aerospace Engine Flying Hours, Share Buybacks,

Operating Margin Improvements and Balance Sheet Improvements. It is worth going through each one:

• Civil Aerospace Engine Flying Hours: Here they say, “In the first half of 2026, large EFH rose by 4% versus the prior period to 113% of 2019 levels, driven primarily by new aircraft deliveries”, nicely above the 110% level I was looking for. Importantly, demand for aircraft and engines remains strong, despite concerns about the impact of higher fuel prices, and the engine order book has increased by 10% year on year. This builds long-term visibility for their key maintenance profit driver. However, there looks to be a modest near-term impact from global worries, as they say, “In Civil Aerospace, we now expect large EFH towards the lower end of the range of 115%-120% of 2019 levels.”

• Share Buybacks: Here they say: “We are making good progress with the £2.5bn 2026 tranche of our share buyback programme, having completed £1.1bn by the end of June and £1.4bn to date. This forms part of our multi-year buyback programme, totalling £7bn-£9bn across 2026 to 2028.” So, no immediate upgrade to this. However, it is a multi-year programme, so it would perhaps not be expected at this stage.

• Operating Margin Improvements: Today’s upgrade is driven largely by higher LTSA margins, and they say: “In Civil Aerospace, we are continuing to improve LTSA margins across our in-production widebody engines through operational improvements and commercial optimisation, including the further successful renegotiation of onerous contracts. The improvements that we are driving across widebody and business aviation have resulted in gross contractual margin improvements of £574m in the period.” However, I can’t see any formal guidance on further margin improvements today.

• Balance Sheet Improvements: Net cash is now up to £2.1bn, an increase of £241m, despite £1.5bn of shareholder returns. It is worth noting that contract liabilities remain significant, with the current figure increasing slightly to £8.6bn. This liability alone exceeds the cash and debt figures.

Other notable impacts:

• Defence: While the Iran war may have reduced commercial flights, especially to the Middle East, flying hours for military aviation have increased. Together with “actions to support a stronger aftermarket performance alongside continued self-help”, this means that Trading cash flow in this segment almost doubled compared to the prior period.

• Power Systems: While the trading cash flow increase was modest compared to the other divisions, underlying operating profit grew by 72%, and order intake was £4.6bn, more than a 50% increase compared to the prior period. Like many large companies, it is the demand for data centres that is driving this trend, and the company is a beneficiary.

Valuation:

Obviously, we don’t have access to the broker coverage for companies of this size. Still, if we assume the 17% increase in underlying operating profit leads to a similar upgrade in FY EPS, this figure rises from 37.5p consensus to 43.9p. With today’s share price rise, the forward P/E drops from 37 to 33x. At the end of the day, so much of the value here is in the future expectations for multi-year growth, rather than a single year’s figures.

The scale and complexity of the business make it almost impossible to value as an external, non-sector specialist. As such, the investment case lies in continued momentum in the underlying business, and in this regard, the signs today are positive.

Mark’s view

On the surface, a 5% share price rise in response to a 17% upgrade in underlying operating profit, mid-point to mid-point, is an underreaction. However, one of the key metrics of large EFH has been guided towards the lower end of the range of 115%-120% of 2019 levels, and the high rating suggests that continued outperformance was probably expected:

The normal H2 Weighting suggests there may be a further upgrade this year, as they have delivered more than half of the underlying operating profit in H1.

The Value Rank of 9 should give us pause, as there will be no immediate downside protection if the momentum starts to wane. As should a Stock Rank that is starting to moderate. However, with upgrades today and no sign of that momentum fading, I think we should be broadly positive here, with AMBER/GREEN, despite these risks. However, I would be quick to reduce our view if the business prospects or share price started to gain downward instead of upward momentum.

---

Lords Trading (LON:LORD)

Down 22% at 12.9p (£27m) - Trading Update - Mark - BLACK (RED ↓)

I last reviewed this distributor of building, plumbing, and heating products following their FY25 profits warning in November and reduced our view to AMBER/RED. I didn’t like the adjustments they made to get to their underlying figures and commented that:

With the share price at 23p, this now looks expensive on forecasts (even without applying more sensible adjustments) and risky given the scale of the debt (incl. lease liabilities).

The flat H1 revenue figures released today don’t look too bad in a difficult market. However, store openings and the acquisition of CMO are responsible, with LFL sales down 7%.

No profitability measures for H1 are provided, aside from noting that CMO is EBITDA-positive during the period. If they have this for CMO, they surely have an indication for the rest of the business. So, not giving any figure here leads me to conclude that the numbers are not great.

I’d previously pointed out that EBITDA is a poor measure here, as it excludes significant lease payments from the figure. This only got worse as the company sought to reduce bank debt by executing a sale-and-leaseback of property assets.

The market gradually started to price in these risks, but not sufficiently, it seems, as today’s update is now a profits warning for FY26:

…with no indications of a significant market recovery in the second half of 2026, the Board now expects full year revenue will be in the range of £475m-£495m and adjusted EBITDA for the full year will be £17m-£18m.

It also seems strange that they gave an in-line statement at their AGM in June. Has the trading/outlook really deteriorated by that much in the last six weeks?

Net bank debt is up to £29m from £13.4m at the year end, which they say is a normal seasonal working capital movement. However, last year inventories declined in the first six months of the year, and were lower than the subsequent year end. So again, this raises questions as to how normal this is?

Forecasts:

We have to turn to their broker, Cavendish, to work out the impact. Adj. EBITDA is cut 12%, but again, this is not a useful measure here. Adj. EPS goes from 1.1p to zero. FY27 numbers are cut as well, with EPS going from 1.6p to 1.1p. Bearing in mind that these will depend on the highly optimistic adjustments the company usually makes to its numbers, this is a poor outcome.

Net bank debt is forecast to be £6.5m higher at £24.9m at the year end, and £6.0m higher at £23.8m.

Mark’s view

This is a stinker of an update, with profitability cut to zero and net debt forecast to be £6.5m higher. With the share price down around 20% today, but half the enterprise value as bank debt, the EV has only really declined by about 10%. This is a possible under-reaction to today’s news.

However, the share price trend suggests that bad news was at least partially expected:

The company highlights the potential for recovery in better markets:

The Board remains confident in the Group's medium-term prospects. The actions taken over the past 18 months to simplify the business, improve operational efficiency, strengthen cash generation and shift the Group's revenue mix towards structurally growing categories leave the Group well positioned to benefit as construction markets recover.

However, many building products companies look cheaper at the moment with the same or better recovery prospects, cleaner accounts and without the debt risk. Given the risk to equity holders that any further significant deterioration in trading would represent, I think we need to have a fully negative view here. RED.

---

Vanquis Banking (LON:VANQ)

Down 20% at 92p (£295m) - Interim results - Mark - AMBER ↓

Background:

I’ll start off by saying that I’m not really a banking analyst, so the scale of the market reaction to today’s Interims surprised me on an initial reading.

The company had come onto my radar a couple of times recently. Firstly, as a smooth trend as the share price recovered from November 2024 lows, delivering 3x returns to investors who held to November 2025:

Then, looking longer-term, this also had the potential to be a recovery bowl with 2022 highs being significantly above the current price:

However, this possible recovery looks to be a long way off following today’s reaction. It is worth noting that this is a potential win for Ed’s recent research on Stock Rank jumpers. Investors who bought when the company became a Super Stock in April 2025 and sold when it went below 75 in March this year, would have doubled their money in a year.

The results:

The profit delivery headline looks good:

Profit before tax increased 44%, exceeding our profit for all of 2025, despite absorbing a significant increase in macroeconomic impairment provision.

However, there is an immediate sign that there may be a ting in the tail, with them saying “macroeconomic uncertainty drives more cautious consumer behaviour".

Like many financial companies, the bottom line is the difference between two very large numbers. After earning £218.1m of interest income in 26H1, they had £102.4m of impairment charges. Non-interest income was £19.4m, and operating costs came in at £126.2m, leaving a PBT of £7.7m.

The impairment charge is just 3.5% of average gross customer balances, but shows how sensitive they are to economic conditions and how small changes here impact the bottom line.

It’s a double whammy, as a more difficult consumer backdrop constrains consumer spending amongst longer-term customers (who are presumably more likely to pay back the money they borrow):

Near term outlook moderated: Higher new customer growth in Credit Cards resulted in a greater proportion of growth coming from new customer acquisition than anticipated, which is lower yielding in its early years, as new credit card balances start to become profitable after two years. This was combined with lower than expected Credit Card spending and utilisation from existing customers due to a more uncertain macroeconomic backdrop. The Group are assuming this trend persists, and intend to continue to drive greater volumes of high quality balance growth from new customers. While this will moderate returns in 2026 and 2027, it positions the Group for stronger profitability beyond the near term impact. The Group now expects a return on tangible equity of low single digits in 2026, low double digits in 2027 and mid-teens in 2028.

The company therefore, is cutting their guidance today for net interest margin to greater than 14.5% and 13% for FY26 and FY27, versus 15.5% and 14.5% previously.

The recovery that was to see them deliver mid-teens Returns on Tangible Equity (and therefore much-improved EPS) is now delayed until 2028, from 2027. However, given the economic sensitivity and the downgrade today, I can see why the market may be calling this simply a delay, travelling hopefully.

Forecasts:

Panmure Liberum say:

We leave our balance growth forecasts unchanged. The lower yield and higher impairment guidance feed through to risk-adjusted income, which we cut by c.7.5% across our forecast period. Because the business carries a high fixed cost base, that reduction is heavily geared at the profit line: net income estimates fall by c.67% in FY26E, c.35% in FY27E and c.16% in FY28E.

But the impact is most acutely seen in the EPS forecasts, which they cut by 63% to 5.0p for FY26. The later-year impacts are less severe, but still sizeable, with FY27 reduced by 36% to 14.1p and 16% taken out of the FY28 numbers.

With these in mind, I can see why the market has reacted strongly to the downgrade here.

The positive news is that PL is now forecasting a dividend for the first time, driven by a higher capital surplus. This will be modest at first but is forecast to grow to 4.4p by 2028.

Asset Value:

Of course, short-term earnings are not the only way to value a bank, as many of us found out to our cost in 2008!

In these results, NTAV/share is reported at 134p, and Panmure Liberum forecasts it will rise over the next few years to close to 170p in FY28.

This may represent good value relative to the current 92p share price for those who believe the company can eventually reach its targeted RoTE.

Mark’s view

With current year EPS forecasts cut by 63%, this no longer looks like good value on earnings unless you believe the FY28 forecasts. Given the scale of today's downgrades, the idea that this is just a recovery delayed must be taken with a pinch of salt. The discount to TBV suggests there is value here if that recovery comes. However, with earnings being the difference between several large numbers, I wouldn’t be brave enough to forecast exactly when that is.

Graham increased his view on this company in April, on the news that Vanquis will not challenge the FCA’s redress scheme and is focused on implementation. Its previous, very minor £3m provision for this matter remained unchanged, which was good news. However, this now seems overshadowed by the negative news today on core market conditions.

With so much uncertainty around, I think the Stock Ranks should guide us. After all, they did a great job of calling when investors should have bought or sold the shares over the last 18 months or so. As such, a Stock Rank of 61, which will surely go lower after today’s fall in share price, suggests we should be neutral. AMBER

---

Fintel (LON:FNTL)

Up 2% at 197p (£201m) - Half Year Trading Update - Mark - AMBER =

Given the acquisitive nature of the business, it is good that the company break out their organic growth rates. The bad news is that organic revenue growth in the half year came in below inflation:

Organic revenue increased 2.0% to £37.4m (HY25: £36.7m) driven by continued growth in Software and Data of 2.9%, or £18.4m to £18.9m, and organic growth in Services of 1.1%, or £18.3m to £18.5m.

Things look better on an adjusted EBITDA basis:

Organic adjusted EBITDA growth of 11.2% to £11.8m (HY25: £10.6m), reflecting improved performance and efficiency in the business.

However, a quick look at recent results shows this to be a poor measure with which to judge a business that capitalises intangible development expenditure.

They also seem to want to be able to regularly acquire businesses to deliver growth, and fire staff to reduce costs while expecting shareholders to exclude the sizable costs associated with doing so.

Forecasts:

This is an in-line trading statement overall, but that is perhaps not that challenging when Cavendish are forecasting a 2% decline in revenue and EPS up 11%.

There is £38.2m of net debt at the half year, and Cavendish calculate they are trading at 9.6x EV/EBIT, which is not expensive, but also doesn’t scream value for a business that appears to be plodding along, and has some significant adjustments in these figures.

Mark’s view

There are some good aspects about this acquisitive company. Defaqto, in particular, is an excellent platform business. However, the businesses appear to be largely ex-growth on an organic basis. This means the 9.6x EV/ (heavily adjusted) EBIT metric calculated by their broker, Cavendish, looks to be up with events.

The Stock Rank and “Falling Star” classification suggest we should be negative on this business. There may be little upside from the current price. However, a negative view is probably overly harsh given the quality of some of the subsidiaries, such as Defaqto, and I think we should be neutral, overall. AMBER