Picture of Close Brothers logo

CBG Close Brothers News Story

0.000.00%
gb flag iconLast trade - 00:00
FinancialsSpeculativeMid CapValue Trap

REG - Financial Conduct - FCA motor finance update

For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below:
https://newsfile.refinitiv.com/getnewsfile/v1/story?guid=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20241113:nRSM0495Ma&default-theme=true

RNS Number : 0495M  Financial Conduct Authority  13 November 2024

Financial Conduct Authority to consult on extending the time motor finance
firms have to handle commission complaints

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) will consult on extending the time firms
have to respond to consumer complaints about motor finance where a
non-discretionary commission was involved, and for consumers to refer them to
the Financial Ombudsman Service. The proposals are expected to be published
within 2 weeks and, if taken forward, would mean the complaint extension is in
place by mid-December 2024.

The FCA's decision to consult follows the Court of Appeal's 25 October
judgment in Hopcraft v Close Brothers Ltd, Johnson v Firstrand Bank Ltd, and
Wrench v Firstrand Bank Ltd.

Since that judgment, the FCA, as part of its close market monitoring, has
undertaken extensive industry engagement. The regulator joined an industry and
government discussion, convened its own industry roundtable and has spoken
with 63 firms. The FCA has also discussed the judgment's implications with
consumer representatives.

Motor finance firms are likely to receive a high volume of complaints in
response to the recent Court of Appeal judgment. Any complaint extension would
allow them time to consider how these might be efficiently and effectively
handled. This would help prevent disorderly, inconsistent and inefficient
outcomes for consumers making complaints, motor finance firms and the market.

In Hopcraft, Johnson and Wrench, the Court of Appeal decided it was unlawful
for the brokers (car dealers) to receive a commission from the lender
providing motor finance without obtaining the customer's informed consent to
the payment. This required the consumer to be told all material facts,
including the amount of the commission and how it was to be calculated.  The
judgment related to fixed commission in motor finance agreements as well as
discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs), which were banned by the FCA in
2021.

The focus of the Court of Appeal decision is common law, rather than FCA rules
or principles. Firms authorised by the FCA must meet wider legal requirements
as well as regulatory rules. The interpretation of common law is rightly for
the courts.

The 2 lenders involved in the cases intend to appeal.

The proposed complaint extension will cover at least the period until the
Supreme Court decides whether to grant permission to appeal. The FCA will
include options on the length of the proposed extension in its consultation.

The FCA will write to the Supreme Court asking it to decide quickly whether it
will give permission to appeal and, if it does, to consider it as soon as
possible, given the potential impact of any judgment on the market and the
consumers who rely on it. If permission to appeal is granted, the FCA will
consider intervening to share its expertise to assist the Court.

Motor finance firms will need to use the time provided to ensure they have the
resources to issue final responses to complaints at the end of a proposed
extension. Motor finance firms are also likely to need to consider whether
they should make any financial provisions as complaints need to be handled in
line with the law.

Customers who believe they have cause to complain about commission
arrangements should make them as normal.

Our review into historical DCAs in motor finance

In January this year, the FCA launched a review
(https://www.fca.org.uk/news/statements/fca-undertake-work-motor-finance-market)
of historical motor finance DCAs across several firms.

The review seeks to understand if there was widespread misconduct related to
DCAs before the 2021 ban, if consumers have lost out and, if so, the best way
to make sure any compensation owed is received in an appropriate settlement in
an orderly, consistent and efficient way.

Alongside the review, motor finance firms were given more time to provide
final responses to complaints about motor finance where a DCA was involved,
and consumers more time to refer their complaints to the Financial Ombudsman.
This was to prevent disorderly, inconsistent and inefficient outcomes for
consumers and knock-on effects on firms and the market while the FCA reviewed
the issue and determined the best way forward.

In September, the FCA further extended this
(https://www.fca.org.uk/news/statements/extension-motor-finance-complaint-handling-pause-confirmed)
until 4 December 2025. This was because it had taken longer than expected to
get the data needed for the review. Before deciding its next steps, the FCA
also wanted to take account of relevant court decisions. These included the
recent Court of Appeal judgment and the outcome of the judicial review, heard
in October 2024, by Barclays Partner Finance of a Financial Ombudsman decision
relating to a DCA in a motor finance agreement, on which we are expecting
judgment shortly.

The FCA is considering what impact the Court of Appeal's judgment has on the
review into historical DCAs in motor finance, including for both its timeline
and scope. This will inevitably be heavily influenced by any decision of the
Supreme Court to hear an appeal and, should it do so, its timelines.

 

This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact
rns@lseg.com (mailto:rns@lseg.com)
 or visit
www.rns.com (http://www.rns.com/)
.

RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our
Privacy Policy (https://www.lseg.com/privacy-and-cookie-policy)
.   END  IRSFFLSMDELSELF

Recent news on Close Brothers

See all news