- Part 2: For the preceding part double click ID:nBwP39Fsa
services received in exchange for the grant of any share-based
payment which vested after the Company`s transition to IFRSs are measured at
their fair values. Where employees are rewarded using share-based payments, the
fair values of employees` services are determined indirectly by reference to the
fair value of the instrument granted to the employee.
The fair value is appraised at the grant date and excludes the impact of
non-market vesting conditions. Fair value is measured by use of the Black
Scholes model. The expected life used in the model has been adjusted, based on
management`s best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise
restrictions, and behavioural considerations.
All equity-settled share-based payments are ultimately recognised as an expense
in the income statement with a corresponding credit to "other reserves".
If vesting periods or other non-market vesting conditions apply, the expense is
allocated over the vesting period, based on the best available estimate of the
number of share options expected to vest. Estimates are subsequently revised if
there is any indication that the number of share options expected to vest
differs from previous estimates. Any cumulative adjustment prior to vesting is
recognised in the current period. No adjustment is made to any expense
recognised in prior years if share options ultimately exercised are different to
that estimated on vesting.
Upon exercise of share options the proceeds received net of attributable
transaction costs are credited to share capital and, where appropriate, share
premium.
Financial instruments
The Group`s financial assets comprise cash and cash equivalents, investments and
loans and receivables. Financial assets are assigned to the respective
categories on initial recognition, depending on the purpose for which they were
acquired. This designation is re-evaluated at every reporting date at which a
choice of classification or accounting treatment is available.
The Group`s loans, investments and receivables are non-derivative financial
assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active
market. Loans and receivables are measured at fair value on initial recognition.
After initial recognition they are measured at amortised cost using the
effective interest rate method, less any provision for impairment. Any change in
their value is recognised in profit or loss. The Group`s receivables fall into
this category of financial instruments. Discounting is omitted where the effect
of discounting is immaterial. All receivables are considered for impairment on a
case-by-case basis when they are past due at the Statement of Financial Position
date or when objective evidence is received that a specific counterparty will
default.
Investments that are held as available for sale financial assets are financial
assets that are not classified in any other categories. After initial
recognition, available for sale financial assets are measured at fair value. Any
gains or losses from changes in fair value of the financial asset are recognised
in equity, except that impairment losses, foreign exchange gains and losses on
monetary items and interest calculated using the effective interest method are
recognised in the income statement.
Where there is a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of an
available for sale financial asset (which constitutes objective evidence of
impairment), the full amount of the impairment, including any amount previously
charged to equity, is recognised in the consolidated income statement. The
Directors consider a significant decline to be one in which the fair value is
below the weighted average cost by more than 25%. A prolonged decline is
considered to be one in which the fair value is below the weighted average cost
for a period of more than twelve months.
If an available for sale equity security is impaired, any further declines in
the fair value at subsequent reporting dates are recognised as impairments.
Reversals of impairments of available for sale equity securities are not
recorded through the income statement. Upon sale, accumulated gains or losses
are recycled through the income statement.
Other financial assets comprise warrants. After initial recognition, other
financial assets are measured at fair value. Any gains or losses from changes in
fair value of the other financial asset are recognised in the income statement.
Financial liabilities, which are measured at amortised cost, and equity
instruments are classified according to the substance of the contractual
arrangements entered into. An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a
residual interest in the assets of the entity after deducting all of its
financial liabilities. Any instrument that includes a repayment obligation is
classified as a liability.
Where the contractual liabilities of financial instruments (including share
capital) are equivalent to a similar debt instrument, those financial
instruments are classed as financial liabilities, and are presented as such in
the Statement of Financial Position. Finance costs and gains or losses relating
to financial liabilities are included in the income statement. Finance costs are
calculated so as to produce a constant rate of return on the outstanding
liability.
Where the contractual terms of share capital do not have any features meeting
the definition of a financial liability then such capital is classed as an
equity instrument. Dividends and distributions relating to equity instruments
are debited direct to equity.
Compound financial instruments
Compound financial instruments comprise both liability and either equity
components or embedded derivatives.
For compound instruments including equity components, at issue date the fair
value of the liability component is estimated by discounting its future cash
flows at an interest rate that would have been payable on a similar debt
instrument without any equity conversion option. The liability component is
accounted for as a financial liability. The difference between the net issue
proceeds and the liability component, at the time of issue, is the residual or
equity component, which is accounted for as an equity reserve.
Embedded derivatives included within compound instruments are calculated using
the Black Scholes model and are also included within liabilities, but are
measured at fair value in the Statement of Financial Position, with changes in
the fair value of the derivative component recognised in the consolidated income
statement. The amounts attributable to the liability components equal the
discounted cash flows.
Transaction costs that relate to the issue of a compound financial instrument
are allocated to the liability and equity components of the instrument in
proportion to the allocation of the proceeds.
The interest expense on the liability component is calculated by applying the
effective interest rate for the liability component of the instrument. The
difference between any repayments and the interest expense is deducted from the
carrying amount of the liability.
Upon conversion of loan note debt the corresponding carrying value of loan note
liability and equity reserve is released, and the difference between these and
the nominal value of the shares issued on conversion is recognised as a share
premium.
Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRSs requires
management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the
application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income
and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical
experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under
the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making the judgements
about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an on-going basis.
Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the year in which the
estimate is revised if the revision affects only that year or in the year of the
revision and future years if the revision affects both current and future years.
The most critical accounting policies and estimates in determining the financial
condition and results of the Group are those requiring the greater degree of
subjective or complete judgement. These relate to:
• fair values and impairment of investments in THEMAC Resources Group Ltd (Note
9);
• impairment reviews covering other investments (Note 9);
• capitalisation of exploration costs (Note 10);
• recovery of amount due from former subsidiary (Note 11);
• share-based payments (Note 14);
• conversion of YA Global loan into ordinary shares (Note 16).
3 Operating loss Year ended Year ended
30 September 30 September
The operating loss is stated after charging: 2014 2013
£ £
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
- continuing operations 358 1,663
Operating lease expenses 13,815 13,815
Share-based payments - 130,000
Auditors' remuneration:
Fees payable to current auditor and its associates for audit of the Group`s annual financial statements (including £15,000 (2013: £15,000) in respect of the Company and £9,000 (2013: £5,000) in respect of subsidiary undertakings) 24,000 20,000
4 Loss per share Year ended Year ended
30 September 30 September
2014 2013
Weighted number of shares in issue during the year 3,260,089,969 1,526,068,537
£ £
(Loss) from continuing operations (1,746,397) (7,520,872)
Profit from discontinued operations attributable to owners of the parent - 209,501
(Loss) from continuing and discontinued operations attributable to owners of the parent (1,746,397) (7,311,371)
For both the continuing operations and for the continuing and discontinued
operations, the disclosure of the diluted loss per share is the same as the
basic loss per share as the conversion of share options decreases the basic loss
per share thus being anti-dilutive.
5Corporation tax expense
The relationship between the expected tax expense based on the corporation tax
rate of 22% for the year ended 30 September 2014 (2013: 23.5%) and the tax
expense actually recognised in the income statement can be reconciled as
follows:
Year ended Year ended
30 September 30 September
2014 2013
£ £
Group loss for the year (1,746,397) (7,320,596)
Loss on activities at effective rate of corporation tax of 22% (2013: 23.5%) (384,207) (1,720,340)
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes 205,045 1,566,932
Income not taxable (144) (18)
Depreciation in excess of capital allowances 79 391
Loss carried forward 179,227 153,035
Tax income / expense, net - -
The Company has unused tax losses of £2,600,000 (2013: £1,850,000) and other
temporary differences amounting to losses of £Nil (2013: £3,000). The related
deferred tax asset has not been recognised in respect of these losses as there
is no certainty in regards to the level and timing of future profits. No
deferred tax adjustment arises on the fair value movements on the available for
sale investments as any gain/loss on disposal will be exempt from tax.
6Staff numbers and costs
Year ended Year ended
30 September 30 September
2014 2013
Number Number
Directors 3 3
Administration 2 2
Total 5 5
The aggregate payroll costs of these persons were as follows:
£ £
Staff wages and salaries 48,468 69,292
Directors` cash based emoluments 333,315 247,507
Share-based payments - 130,000
381,783 446,799
The remuneration of the directors, who are the key management personnel of the
Group, in aggregate for each of the categories specified in IAS 24 `Related
Party Disclosures` was as follows:
£ £
Directors` cash based emoluments 333,315 247,507
Employer`s national insurance contributions 34,561 20,529
Short-term employment 367,876 268,036
Share-based payments - 102,386
367,876 370,422
Directors` remuneration
As required by AIM Rule 19, details of remuneration earned in respect of the
financial year ended 30 September 2014 by each Director are set out below:
Year ended 30 September 2014
Director Salary Bonus Share-based payments Total
£ £ £ £
S Clayson 141,667 35,799 - 177,466
P Johnson 70,833 17,900 - 88,733
R Watts 54,229 12,887 - 67,116
266,729 66,586 - 333,315
Year ended 30 September 2013
Director Salary Bonus Share-based payments Total
£ £ £ £
P A Harford 5,833 - - 5,833
S Clayson 90,641 34,404 55,046 180,091
L Tenuta 5,000 - - 5,000
K Irons 12,000 - - 12,000
P Johnson 41,194 17,202 27,523 85,919
R Watts 28,844 12,389 19,817 61,050
183,512 63,995 102,386 349,893
The highest paid Director received remuneration of £177,466 (2013: £125,045),
excluding share-based payments. R Watts received remuneration totalling £67,116
(2013 £61,050) via a service company.
Details of each Director`s share options and interests in the Company`s shares
are shown in the Directors` Report.
7Finance income and costs
Year ended Year ended
30 September 30 September
Finance costs 2014 2013
£ £
Issue costs of convertible loan