Analyse your stocks in seconds
Expert insights you can understand
Improve the odds of your stock picks
Generate investing ideas fast
Track & improve your Portfolio
Time your trades better with charts
Explore all the featuresStockopedia contains every insight, tool and resource you need to sort the super stocks from the falling stars.
Ahead of taking him to lunch at his favourite restaurant, I’d agreed to meet Robbie Burns at his office (a second home) on the banks of the Thames in west London. It later transpires that the place has been be a pretty smart speculation in London’s booming property market. But after a couple of hours with him it’s clear that like a lot of things, Robbie’s relationship with wealth is at times both serious and fairly easy going.
He’s a man content and appreciative of his own success and the comfort that it’s given his family. But there are no flashy cars or expensive hobbies. In fact, material details don’t always matter to him. You start to see that as soon as you reach the front door…
“The doorbell isn’t working at the moment so call me when you get there!”
Robbie Burns is the Naked Trader. A decade after writing his eponymous guide to ‘how anyone can make money trading shares’, it’s now in its fourth edition. Over the years his loyal readers have followed him through booms, crashes, bubbles, successes and failures. He’s won a place in their hearts for his no-nonsense, down-to-earth prose that literally laughs in the face of complicated investment speak. By keeping things simple, wearing mistakes on his sleeve and encouraging individual investment he’s built a very successful brand around himself.
Later this year there’ll be three more books from him. Among them will be an update to The Naked Trader’s Guide to Spread Betting, a second on trading psychology and the third will be Robbie’s debut novel.
While the original book is cheeky, laddish and readable, there are some hard-hitting messages in it. For a start, it’s clear he’s very sensitive to the risks of behavioural mistakes. He frequently warns about the perils of making decisions driven by emotion. Deep down, the book is about taking a checklist approach to trading. He suggests looking for profitable, growing companies that aren’t debt laden. Dividends are important (mainly to cover trading costs), the shares have to be reasonably priced and they need positive price momentum behind them. He also take a ruthless view on losing positions, cutting early, often with a stop loss. It’s a strategy that makes a great deal of sense, but it needs discipline too.
During the negotiations prior to us meeting, I’d been challenged to a game of table football. In the event I was given the option of pinball instead (there’s an arcade machine by the front door). I opted for soccer and got trounced.
Relieved to get that over with, we moved to Robbie’s trading screen - yes, just the one - perched on a table overlooking the river. He’s candid about the details of his ISA account (he bangs the drum for investing through ISAs) and his IG spread betting account. The balances are mightily impressive but he insists that he isn’t immune to the occasional loss.
Turning to the matter of lunch, I’d gone dressed in standard Stockopedia uniform. On my previous meeting with Lord Lee, I wasn’t entirely sure he approved. But on this occasion I was advised that I’d probably overdone it. “You don’t look at all comfortable in that jacket,” he laughed. Five minutes walk away is The River Cafe, a lively Michelin starred Italian with even livelier prices, and it sounds like it’s his local haunt.
Robbie Burns - either feeling bullish or just very happy that I was paying for lunch
I suspect that behind your relaxed persona and easy going attitude is a ruthlessly disciplined guy. Would you agree with that?
Well, I think I treat the whole thing as a business. If things are getting out of control I just cut them. All my stuff is so simple I think people are quite surprised. They expect charts and lines, but it’s nothing like that.
I’m a weird mix. I’m happy-go-lucky in some departments but when it comes to trading, the main thing is that I treat it like a business. To win at trading you’ve got to be cold, calculating and really hard-hearted. Perhaps you even need to be a bit of a s*** in the trading element of it. Because in the end if you’re winning, somebody else is losing unfortunately. But you’ve done the homework and they haven’t, and that’s the way of the world. So I think you have to be quite ruthless, and if you’re nice you’re not going to cut it. In the States they call it sharks and fishes - the sharks prey off the fishes.
You started trading full time just as the tech bubble was taking off in the late 1990s. What lessons did you learn in those early years?
I learnt a lot between 2000 and 2006, when I wrote the first book. I learnt from mistakes, so every time I made a mistake I asked myself: ‘why did I f*** this up and how can I stop it happening again?’ It took four or five years of learning the ropes.
Coffee Republic was my worst mistake. I initially bought it because I liked the coffee. I remember quite clearly buying them at 28p, and then at 22p, more at 13p and then at 8p. But it was one of the best things ever because I remember feeling so happy when I finally cut it at 3p. I felt like I’d been released.
I suppose where I’ve been lucky is that I’ve only ever used my ISA allowances and I’m guessing I’ve put about about £40,000 into spread betting accounts. Even now, £15,000 a year is the only money I add. I try to leave the ISAs to run if I can, I wouldn’t imagine taking money out of them for a while. The spread bets are like lucky money, I don’t consider that I’ve got it until I actually bank it.
Your strategy often picks up smaller companies, so with a growing pot of capital I guess you’ve had to be very conscious of the ability to get in and out of those shares when you’re trading sizeable sums?
I think it is harder now for me than it was. I guess if you’ve got a pot of £100,000 it is quite easy to be nimble and move in and out of stuff. But when you’ve got more than a million pounds in an ISA - I’ve got something like 65 positions - that makes things a bit harder.
I might have £100,000 of Paysafe and because it’s FTSE 250 I won’t have any trouble getting in and out of that. But with something like Next Fifteen Communications, I had about £40,000 and it did really well so I cut half of it. With £20,000 it should be quite easy to get out if I need to.
At one of my seminars a guy said that he’d bought £170,000 of Coms, which is a tiny penny share. He’d bought them at 10p, and that was his whole pot. I asked him if he realised that if he tried to sell the whole lot the market makers might only give him 1p for them. People don’t realise that the price is there, but only up to a certain amount of money. I know why he did it, he thought Coms would go to 50p and he’d be a millionaire. That was in his mind when he bought them. But at 7p you’ve lost £35,000. What are you going to do about it? Probably nothing. Then you read the bulletin boards where people are trying to encourage you to keep them or buy more. Now you’re in a terrible place. I said that if I was him I’d be selling as much of them as possible every day until I was down to around £10,000 worth. That’s what he should have had in the first place. But I knew that he wouldn’t do it and the shares are about 1p now. I think that happens to a lot of people.
There’s obviously a lot of psychological forces at work when it comes to buying and selling shares. How have you refined your process to deal with that?
What a lot of people think when they buy a share is that they’ve got a massive winner at some point. In my new book I talk about confirmation bias, which to me is one of the most interesting things in psychology. What I say is that when you approach a share, approach it negatively. What are the bad points? What could go wrong with it and why could it be down 100% in six months? What is the risk involved with the share?
That’s where my net debt rule came in - I wouldn’t buy anything which had three times debt to profits. There was a share called Aero Inventory that I’d looked at, and it seemed fantastic. The profit was quite nice at about £33 million, but multiply that by three and net debt shouldn’t have been more than £100 million, but it was £450 million. I looked like an idiot for six weeks or so because the shares did go up. But they were suspended a few months later and it went bust.
So first you’ve got to say ‘what’s the risk?’, not ‘I’m going to make a million out of this’. The moment you do that you’ll be looking for all the reasons that confirm your decision to buy the share.
What else drives the decision for you to buy a share and what’s your process for building a position?
I look at my portfolio as a room with a massive door. Any share has to really, really bang on that door to get in. It has really got to have everything going for it.
Before I make the decision to buy, bearing in mind I’m always trying to put myself off, I look at the supply and demand - what’s Level 2 looking like? There is no point buying something where there’s no demand because it will just carrying on going down. That has saved me numerous times from getting into stinkers. If I see lots of sellers out there I wait. It’s quite simple because if you buy it on a strong Level 2, it should then rise. If it doesn’t, and it starts to go down, I have what I call my ‘get out quick’, and I’m just out.
Stop losses for me have changed. A stop loss to me is an emergency exit, way down the line, just in case something terrible happens. But on a new trade I’m much more likely to get out really fast. Then I’m only going to try two more times, a bit lower down. If I’ve tried three times with a share and it’s still not working, I just stop.
On the subject of stop losses, say one of your positions is up 50%. Would you still use a stop loss or is it no longer important?
No, I just top-slice as they go up usually, but I would recommend people to use a trailing stop well away from current price.
So your approach with new positions is to start small and then build up over time?
Exactly. I’ll start small with something and as it goes up I get more confident and average up. I would never average down now. Instead of averaging down it’s best to just get out. Otherwise, the longer you hold onto it the more you’re likely to hold it because you think it’s not worth selling. Psychologically it’s damaging. This is why airline pilots are such good traders, because they learn confirmation bias as part of their training.
Confirmation bias is a big thing, it’s very easy to find other people on the internet that agree with you. This is why bulletin boards are very dangerous. It’s what I mean when I say that I treat this like a business. I don’t look at bulletin boards, I look at cold hard figures, I look at what’s going on and I don’t care what anybody else thinks.
There is so much out there that you can look at that can confuse you. I’ve narrowed it down to a very small number of things. If it hasn’t got everything right then I at least keep an eye on what’s going wrong with it. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with taking the odd bit of high risk. Sometimes it pays off but you’ve got to do it to a small degree, and I just assume that I’ll lose the money. I think that probably takes a bit of my gambling instinct out of it, which I think everyone has.
What would be your definition of an ideal investment outcome?
Probably one that keeps going up slowly over time. One with dividends and no big worries and which might eventually get taken over. That’s the case with GB Group, which went from 20p to 250p over seven years.
At Stockopedia we took the essence of your strategy and modelled it using ratios and rules to reflect the growth, momentum, quality and value factors that you look for. That Naked Trader-esque Screen has done very well over the past four years. Would you change anything in those rules?
The rules look fine but I would look at AIM stocks as well as the Main Market. But I am more wary of AIM shares so you might need to make a separate list.
You’re obviously keen on spread betting, but do you think individual traders use it wisely?
I just use spread betting to supplement my ISAs and I don’t use that much leverage. For example, I’ve had a spread bet in Dignity for two years, which is up £35,000. It costs me 50p every night to keep it open, but that’s fine. After all, death isn’t going to go out of fashion, so who knows it might be open for the next five years. But you can keep longer-term things open in spread betting. It’s a great facility, and of course you can go short, which is great for you to be able to cover yourself.
The problem of course is that it can be addictive, which can lead you to use the leverage and overtrade. You have to use it very carefully. But you can have guaranteed stops, which is fantastic. Let’s say you were shorting something that could be bid for, with spread betting you can know your potential loss for definite. I would only do that where I felt there was just a chance something could be bid for where I was short. Say you were short Wm Morrison but you thought, ‘hang on, what happens if Tesco makes a surprise bid for it?’ That’s the way I look at it - I’m looking at the risk every time, trying to judge it.
What do you think is wrong with most of the trading ‘advice’ that investors are faced with?
Most start talking jargon very quickly and complicate things. The more I did this the more I realised I needed to uncomplicate everything. Then I realised you could do that with everything in life. People go to these technical analysis seminars and they just get bulldozed. I say to them, ‘do you think your trainer was making any money, really?’ I wouldn’t dream of doing a seminar unless I could show them what I’d made in my accounts.
People are naturally cynical and I can understand that. I don’t look at bulletin boards or Twitter but I’m sure people say ‘ah, Robbie Burns makes it up’, or ‘he said he does this but he doesn’t’. I just think, ‘if only you could come and see’. But I can understand the cynicism.
One of the final points you make in your book is that it’s very easy to over-analyse a share. Do you think there’s a risk that you can talk yourself out of investing in anything?
Yes. But the thing is that if you buy it, you can get out if it starts to go down. So I can say to myself, ‘well I’m not 100% sure but Level 2 looks strong so I’ll give it a try’. If it doesn’t work out then I’m out. So although I think that everything has to be in my favour, if I’m not sure about a negative then I will probably give it a go if Level 2 looks good.
But having said that I don’t trade very often. If in doubt, do nowt, as they say. If you find yourself over-screening and pushing every button in sight then there is probably something going wrong. You’re panicking, you’re fearful or you’re greedy. You should stop yourself from pressing buttons that much and think before you click.
I think there’s also a risk of comfort trading. If you’re feeling bored you might trade without really thinking. Right now, when markets are going down there is no real stampede to buy. If you’re reasonably covered with a short there isn’t much to worry about selling either.
I don’t forecast the market, obviously I haven’t got the foggiest idea where the market will go. Some people say sell everything while others say it’s fine. At the moment I’m seeing a lot of company reports coming out and a lot of my companies are saying they’re ahead. That might change. But generally it’s the new trades that you’ve got to worry about. With a new trade you have to look after it, and if it starts to go down get out of it. But once I’m up by more than 20% I have a look from time to time. I’ve got many good trades still there from years ago like Avon Rubber and GB Group, which have multi-bagged.
You’ve previously talked about using short ETFs - including the SUK2 FTSE 100 2x Super Short ETF - to cover positions that you don’t want to sell. Are you using them currently, and what are the signs you look for when getting in and out of those positions.
Yes, I have been using ETFs to short the market in an ISA. I got one at 7100 and sold out at 6400. It isn't my area - 7100 was easy as a top, if the market just looks rocky. They are great because if the market goes back up you sell and take a small loss. They are a brilliant insurance policy, and incidentally, you can get 3x and 5x short ETFs now.
Where do you think individual investors generally make mistakes?
People want to make money really fast. I think that if you try to chase money it will run away from you. You just need to bring it in slowly. But no-one is interested in that these days because they want to make their money now, and that’s why they lose.
Look at the markets at the moment - fear is the utmost emotion. But when people are s******* themselves, it’s a great time to buy. When everyone is feeling miserable, if you look at fundamentals, there are a lot of bargains out there. What’s amazing is how everyone is scared and then five minutes later everything is going up again - the market turns in an instant.
Finally, we asked our readers for questions that they’d like to ask you - many of which we’ve covered. But here are a final few that we missed...
Where does he buy his clothes?!
Primark obviously.
I'm just reading his book, the 2nd edition. One thing I would like to ask is that he says not to do bottom fishing but it seems to me that he does do that himself. Has his trading strategy changed?
Buy Edition 4 you tight git!! I do the odd bottom fish but get out fast if keeps on going down.
I understand that recommends running winners and cutting losers, but I notice that he has a very good ratio of winners compared to losers. It would be good to understand how he gets those sort of results.
Losers get dumped fast - I have a get out quick philosophy. But occasionally, like everyone, I screw up of course.
Does he ever put shorts on?
Usually first thing in the morning if I can't find pyjama bottoms. Yes definitely, I tend to be a shorter of the FTSE rather than individual stocks though. I made a massive pile shorting Carpetright from 720p to 320p
Since he started trading to the present day, what one rule in his investing tool box would he say has contributed the most to his investing success?
Spotting if a company has big debt that might swamp it. This has avoided me buying and holding any total busts.
Robbie, thank you so much for your time.
About Ben Hobson
Stockopedia writer, editor, researcher and interviewer!
Disclaimer - This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.
@Velo
Meaning? INMO? = Internal Monolog? TA indicators? = Technical Indicators? , which ones?
Stop-Loss:
Of course you are wright; every share has its own "implied volatility" or "beta". If you want to trade single shares in a William O'Neil or Kevin Marder (Market Watch) breakout system / concept, read Brian June / Van K. Tharp about money management and how to calculate stop-loss based on your loss tolerance.
But at the heart of Stockopedias concept lies the PORTFOLIO of 20-25 shares and NOT SEVERAL BETS on single shares (= gambling approach)!
The holding-period is 3 to 12 month (quarterly or yearly rescanning and rebalancing)
For investors* who follow the Stockopedia approach the portfolio itself is the primary stop-loss in a secular** bull market. That means the portfolio as a whole does counterbalance the "beta***" of the individual liquid traded**** shares in the portfolio. The selection of the 20-25 liquid shares based on their Stockrank(TM) *****should basically help to avoid bad surprises (certain events are not detectable / trackable neither in price-events nor with fundamental ratios)
In the context of a 20-25 liquid shares portfolio activated stop-loss orders at your broker on all 20-25 shares have only the function of an emergency stop-loss. Therefore in a healthy market they basically should be put in place only when you are on a vacation or have no time for a monthly check (and only monthly and not daily ! ) of the 20-25 positions.
The distance should be wide > 14% (read Stop losses: Help or Hindrance? Dr. Bruce Vanstone)
"If you can't sleep at night then the risk is not right" (Ed Seykota) and you should reduce the amount of money you have in the stock-market as a whole.
"If you have trouble imagining a 20% loss in the stock market, you shouldn't be in stocks" John Bogle (Vanguard)
By the way Farrell's (USA) eight "lazy portfolios" were (minus!) -28.3 % till - 43.5% over 12 month at the beginning of 2009. But: "to win you have to be in" Tweedy Browne (= vicious circle of stock-investors ).
The importance of the quality of the Stockrank (and the many other ratios) for Stockopedia subscribers is the reason why I think the Stockopedia team should give more information about (= make more transparent) how the data from Reuters is used to calculate the different fundamental ratios (especially for banks-, insurance-, property- and specific companies, where things are not always obvious). Further the most important numbers in the income-, balance- and cash flow statements (especially sales and operating cash flow = least manipulated) should be accessible in the "Table Editor" in the "folios" for at least the last three years. Users can then "adjust" the Stockopedia Rank system to their stock-univers (US, UK, FR ....) from which they equip their portfolio. This would also help to avoid crowded trades and frontrunning by market maker (in case of non electronically executed trades) if too many subscribers uniquely use the StockRank as selection criteria.
(*investors go long only and holding period >= 3 month, traders go long + short in shorter time frame)
(**secular bull market = a market driven by forces that could be in place for many years, causing the price of a particular asset class to rise over a long period of time (Investopia))
(*** beta describes the relation of a single share to its market as a whole)
(**** liquid means daily trading volume of 10-20 times your single position size and no micro caps were prices can be manipulated by one single agent)
(***** or your individual fork of a base screen)
Readers might like this graph of the Naked one's trades, made from the table on his website. Lines link buy and sell points. The vertical scale is logarithmic so the lines aren't all bunched up.
The paler blue colours are higher value trades. & the accuracy depends on whether his website is updated correctly of course. Nudists are notoriously bad at that.
I'd say this confirms that he runs his winners, cuts his losers. He also seems to get out of a trade quite fast, quite often. I don't know what I'd infer from the pattern of trades in 2009: skittish, guessing the bottom?
I believe he watches for dips, and nips in and out again on a resumption of the normal trading level. So he must have software which flags these situations up?
& lastly, he says above that he never averages down any more: you can see, bottom right, him doing that (4 lines converging) but he escapes with his dignity intact.
Hi snickers,
I love the graphs you put up from time to time.
What is the vertical axis? Is it price rescaled in some way?
Thanks in advance
Phil
Frop
I think you will find in "The Art of Execution" the most successful traders were the hunters who doubled up on stocks when down 20-25% (subject to the story not changing). I agree that in some cases cutting quick is the right thing to do but in others it is not, especially when the markets are as crazy as they are now. It just proves the point of find your own way and follow it. One size does not fit all.
thats true, although you have to have high conviction and knowledge of your shares to justify doing so! If for instance your applying more of a "NAPS" type portfolio then by design you probably don't have an indepth knowledge of each stock and therefore can't make that educated call.
That was inspirational. This is a man I have admired for quite a few years & I even read his (first) book. If one thing in the interview stood out - for me - it was his scary warnings about "confirmational bias". I am aware of this but fighting it is so hard. His approach to combating it is very practical, I like it!
Thanks for posting this article. I too would like to know the nitty gritty on how the Naked Trader screen matches up with Robbie's thinking. Also, get out fast? what is that threshold? Surely the trading costs will rack up quickly if he is getting in and out on a trade multiple times?
Read Robbie Burns books in which he explains the strategies mentioned or even better go to his seminars.
Well said Bearbull, this is now over two years old has anybody take up the request of long term Stockpedia in giving there thought and how they use the screens. As a newbie, I think it would be most helpful.
Interesting, I just had a look at his web site where he lists his trades. Ran through his recent trades for 2019. Using current prices, I gathered the following stats. Keep in mind he doesn't update the site real time so it's directional only.
Numbers of new trades = 55 (about nine a month so a fairly active style)
Average trade size = £4,552 so quite small given the sums in his account. This doesn't take into account adding further to positions, it's the average size per trade. Makes the point about small entries, easy to exit quick if the price doesn't behave itself.
Of the 55 trades 40 were either closed in profit or still open in profit at today's closing price and 15 were closed as losses or still open and losing. So a 73% win rate, which is high.
Average P&L per trade is £488 profit keeping in mind many are still open so will have further to run on profits.
Current capital employed of £180k. A simplistic gross return of 15% in six months, excluding dividends. So that figure could easily annualise into 30% which is high.
Of more interest than the numbers, I had a look at the charts of the shares traded to see his entry points.
The vast majority of entry points were at dips. Mostly where the price had dropped a fair bit and was due a reversal back up. Also a few entry points in rising uptrends, but again tended to buy at a small dip in the trend, not at local highs.
Robbie has been trading shares for many years. Clearly he has developed a real talent for spotting good shares which are due to rise, as well as money management with the quick exits when it goes wrong.
I think if you want to replicate his style, you would need to understand all the pieces. If you study the charts, his entry points are very good.
Very good points.
I would agree the most knowledge I have spotted recently with regards to Robbies style is to look at the charts on the date purchased the logic behind the buy price and his profit target price as you more often than not he will by back on a pull back so long as plenty of support at that area,
He will normally aim for a recent resistance point to see if the price can get through it with a tight stop if it doesn't follow through,
Hi Ambrosia (love the name, you must be a fan of rice pudding too?)
Currently charging an early bird of £490 plus vat. Includes three course lunch, drinks, snacks,
parking and net access. Hope it doesn't sound too much but at that price it might be
surprising but I don't make much per seat after tax, heavy costs and a whack to charity.
But it gets me out of the house and I found most of my best trades come directly from them.
Mail me at robbiethetrader@aol.com if you want to discuss the agenda, what we do
on the day etc.
*Past performance is no indicator of future performance. Performance returns are based on hypothetical scenarios and do not represent an actual investment.
This site cannot substitute for professional investment advice or independent factual verification. To use Stockopedia, you must accept our Terms of Use, Privacy and Disclaimer & FSG. All services are provided by Stockopedia Ltd, United Kingdom (company number 06367267). For Australian users: Stockopedia Ltd, ABN 39 757 874 670 is a Corporate Authorised Representative of Daylight Financial Group Pty Ltd ABN 77 633 984 773, AFSL 521404.
Would that be net profit on stockopeida company stats then ?