45
Archived articleThis is an archived article from 2016 - please note that any content within the article may be out of date.

Small Cap Value Report (30 Sep 2016) - VLK, TET, TNI, AVS, PIER

Good morning!

First of all, a bulk apology. I've accumulated a huge backlog of emails & other messages requiring attention. So if you're waiting for a reply from me, then please accept my apologies, I'll try to catch up over the weekend. It's been manically busy of late.


Brighton ShareSoc

This is now a monthly meeting, on the 2nd Tuesday of each month. So the next meeting is on 11 October, at the same venue, the Caxton Arms, which is very handy for Brighton mainline station.

It was great fun last time, and people came from far and wide to support the event. I really enjoy these events, and at each one I'll be giving a 30 minute talk on the most interesting small caps that I've come across in the last month.

Plus, we get to meet a small cap company each month too. This month, 1pm (LON:OPM) will be giving a presentation. This is an interesting growth company, which helps small businesses finance their asset purchases.

Please could people book a.s.a.p. if you wish to join me at the next meeting in Brighton, as the organisers need early bookings to be able to press ahead and organise the food, etc.


Pension deficit information

Good news! Stockopedia now includes data on company pension deficits. This is something that many of us have been requesting for a long time, so it's brilliant that this has now been added.

This short video from Tom at Stockopedia explains all.

Or, this article also from Tom explains it in text format.



Vislink (LON:VLK)

Share price: 8.95p (down 44% today)
No. shares: 124.6m
Market cap: £11.2m

Interim results to 30 Jun 2016 - John Hawkins' disastrous stewardship of this company continues, with more terrible news for shareholders today. The situation looks extremely precarious, and I think that the company will need to do an emergency fundraising pretty soon, or end up potentially going bust. It's jammed up against the overdraft limit currently, of £15m, with covenant breaches being waived by the bank (so far). That makes it uninvestable, in my view, so I think anyone still holding this share is at large risk of further, maybe total, losses. So it's definitely one to ditch now, as too high risk, in my opinion.

Turnover, and order intake have both fallen sharply. So the business is now loss-making, with yet another round of restructuring underway.

The adjusted loss is £1.1m (down from a £2.2m adjusted profit in H1 2015).

The full loss before tax for H1 this year is a staggering £32.2m, mainly caused by heavy write-downs of intangibles. Whilst these are non-cash write-offs for now, intangible assets were of course originally cash costs at the time of acquisitions being made.

The balance sheet looks very problematic now. I've already mentioned the troubling level of debt, which has increased after the period end, to utilise the full £15m borrowing facility.

However, I also note debtors looks far too high. This is a big red flag, especially at a company such as this which is financially distressed. My guess is that there's possibly a lot of padding in that debtors figure, which will end up being written off. If debtors does begin to turn into cash, then that would help the company reduce its excessive bank debt.

The most recent 1.5p dividend was paid on 18 July 2016. This was clearly a mistake, given how precarious the bank borrowings situation is. I don't expect this company to pay any more divis, so it's safest to treat this as a nil dividend company for valuation purposes.

The company makes positive noises about the future, but I think it's best to disregard management comments at financially distressed companies. They're always going to make positive noises, they have to.

One bit of good news - the hated "value creation plan" - i.e. legalised theft - has been scrapped, with no plans to replace it. I should think so too!

My view - I would get out whilst you still can.


Am rushing for a meeting this afternoon, so a few quick snippets to finish off with;

Treatt (LON:TET) - this share is up 11.7% today on a trading update, which must be positive. It is, being "comfortably above";

The Board is pleased to confirm that the Group has performed well in the second half of the financial year.  As we approach our financial year end, momentum in the business has continued and consequently the Board now expects to report profit before tax and exceptional items for the year ending 30 September 2016 comfortably above its previous expectations.  

That probably means EPS for this year of 12.5p to 13.5p perhaps? So at currently 211p per share, the PER looks to be probably between about 15.6 and 16.9 - which strikes me as probably about right, in current market conditions (where many companies look historically a bit expensive).

It seems to be a good company though, with a decent track record. High quality scores too, I see from the StockReport.


Trinity Mirror (LON:TNI) - a trading update says that it's performing in line with expectations.

The trend in revenue from traditional sources are alarming though;

Group revenue* on a like for like basis is expected to fall by 9% in the third quarter compared to a decline of 8% in the first half. Publishing revenue is expected to fall by 10% with print declining by 12% and digital growing by 11%. Publishing print advertising and circulation revenue fell by 21% and 6% respectively. Classified digital revenues, which are substantially jointly sold with print, remained under pressure but we delivered strong growth in digital display and transactional revenue of 24% as digital audiences continued to grow.


So it's really a question of whether digital revenues can grow enough to make up for the seemingly inevitable evaporation of traditional print revenues?

Low interest rates also make the huge pension fund here a bigger problem.

It's difficult to see much long term hope here.


Avesco (LON:AVS) - I hold a long position in this share, at the time of writing - a good announcement concerning another non-core disposal, raising £5m cash for a subsidiary which was loss-making in 2015 (to the tune of £1.9m), and expected to only make a small profit this year.

So that looks an excellent outcome, dropping off another non-performing asset, following the sale of freehold land earlier this year.

My view is that Avesco is possibly being prepared to maximise shareholder value, maybe in a trade sale? Its US subsidiary, Creative Technologies, is I think worth considerably more than the current market cap.

Even though this share has risen a lot, it's still not expensive, on forecasts of about 25-27p for this year & next year. It should be debt-free now too. I'm hoping for upside to 400-500p here, in the long run, and it remains one of my core personal holdings. So far, so good!


Brighton Pier (LON:PIER)

Share price: 134p (up 0.4% today)
No. shares: 31.7m
Market cap: £42.5m

Results, 52w to 26 Jun 2016 - a reader has prodded me into having a look at this one. Formerly Eclectic Bars, which was a poorly performing, rather random collection of bars. Highly successful entrpreneur Luke Johnson then got involved, and has bought Brighton Pier, bolting it on, and seeking other attractions to add to the group. His stated aim is to create a "mini Merlin".

The Brighton Pier acquisition was effective from 27 April 2016, so results to 26 June 2016 will only include 2 months trading of the Pier, plus 1 years trading from Eclectic Bars.

It's too early to judge whether the Brighton Pier acquisition was good or not. I've looked at its historic accounts, through Companies House website, which are not particularly remarkable. The narrative today talks a lot about the cashflow generated by the pier, but what about all the maintenance & capex required just to keep it standing, exposed to the elements? It must be very expensive to maintain.

The pier certainly attracts enormous footfall, but I'm not sure that is being monetised effectively, as it's free to stroll around. There could be upside potential there perhaps, to improve the facilities, modernise the rather tatty bars, etc.

As regards the old Eclectic Bars business, this seems to have been turned around successfully. Various cost cutting measures, and negotiating a 2.25% margin improvement from a renegotiated drinks supply contract, have boosted profitability.

Adjusted EPS of 4.2p for 2015/16 is unremarkable, but should rise next year when the pier is included for a full year.

There seems to be about £9.4m of net debt, which looks reasonable to me, considering the group owns a valuable asset in Brighton pier.

My opinion - it's too early to judge how this will work out. The turnaround in the bars business is good news though. The shares no doubt contain a Luke Johnson premium, which is justified.

Broker consensus seems to be for 7.4p EPS next year. That equates to a PER of 18.1 - maybe that's a bit too expensive on fundamentals, but it deserves a Luke Johnson premium.

Disclaimer

This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.

30 comments


Avatar for V4Value

Re, Vislink, (I'm a holder unfortunately). I've held for about three years now and the news flow has always been positive until the infamous VCP. Whilst this was a major red flag for a lot of shareholders, and rightly so, the management must have thought they would actually be rewarded from the creation of this plan and hit the targets set. Therefore, what I don't understand is how things could have gone so wrong ever since. A VCP does not in itself damage a company, so the profit warning came as a surprise to many. I recall this was too much for some and they got out, John Rosier included - good for them as it was the correct decision. I held, and I am mildly shocked at the capitulation from what the commentators agreed was a good value-play company. Given the relative small size of my holding (now!) I'm going to grin and bear it. To bail now while everyone is heading for the exit may be a panic move. Only time will tell, but I'm increasingly paying more attention to the Stockopedia ranks going forward and Vislink had a low quality score.

0
Avatar for Simon

AVS is also difficult to trade as there is often a largish spread and the shares are quite illiquid. I hold.

0
Avatar for Rusty2

I did not find the spread too bad, it's about 2% but yes if you want to trade over 1,000 shares you may have problems. I'm still holding on.

0
Avatar for JohnEustace

It looks as if the Avesco (LON:AVS) business is being tidied up to facilitate a trade sale so there may not be a long term to wait for. I'm a holder in any case.

1
Avatar for gus 1065

.... Or the management may just be doing their jobs and cutting out the unprofitable business segments to focus on those that are profitable and have the best growth potential to facilitate a re- rating of the stock price. It's unusual for management to dress themselves up for sale unless there is a strong outside influence (dominant shareholder, potential hostile takeover pending etc.) - a bit like turkeys voting for Christmas.

Either way, hopefully more upside to come for Avesco (LON:AVS) shareholders.

Best,

Gus.

3
Avatar for Carey Blunt

I've looked at Avesco (LON:AVS) briefly before and it's still on my watchlist. is their any danger that their revenues are lumpy, coming along with big events like the olympics only to be followed by a "fallow" year? Also the sale of their property this year ma also provide that same effect? It seems like it may do well this year but then maybe drop next? Anyone any thoughts? One to trade rather than hold for the long term?

0
Avatar for 2020vision

Paul what's your view on SEE. They have issued 3 RNS in the past few weeks, a new chip for use in automotive which will be the key offering of their automotive spinnoff and today 2 new distributors for the fleet product with an initial order of 1,500 units worth A $4.3m. ?

1
Avatar for Paul Scott

Vislink (LON:VLK) looked a pretty good turnaround back in 2011-2015. It started off as being cash rich, with a nice dividend. Then Hawkins' usual approach of gearing up the balance sheet, and making acquisitions, has led us to where we are now.

Revelations about Hawkins only working part-time, taking wildly excessive remuneration (which included even getting the company to pay his personal tax bill!), and then for me the VCP was the last straw, so thankfully I ditched this one before the big falls.

The red flags here really all centre on Hawkins. As you say, his track record is not good - he made a total mess of things at Anite, which he glossed over in presentations. It became increasingly obvious that Vislink was a vehicle for him to plunder for personal enrichment - which I've mentioned a number of times before in my articles here, not just recently.

I agree with TMFMayn's points that financial engineers like Hawkins are the wrong people to back. Smaller companies need entrepreneurial management, with a big personal stake in the business, preferably the founders.

I think financial engineer type management become addicted to doing deals, and often build groups which are shambolically run, and have no real synergies. They often overpay too. You then end up, as is the case with Vislink, with a top heavy balance sheet with worthless intangibles that need to be written off, but a big pile of debt at the bottom of the balance sheet. Then the bank force them to raise fresh equity, at a bombed-out share price, diluting away existing holders to bug*ery. Sepura (LON:SEPU) is another recent example of things going wrong at acquisitive & debt laden companies. So is Lakehouse (LON:LAKE) .

These things with acquisitive management are just best avoided in my view, as they so often go badly wrong.

Regards, Paul.

3
Avatar for AnonymousUser37607

Looks like Vislink needs a refresh at the top, starting with the Executive Chairman - he has had long enough to sort this company out and he has made a complete mess of it; textbook lesson in how to destroy shareholder value. However, judging by the Board with 2 appointed nearly a decade ago it doesn't look like a company that embraces change; more like an old boy's club.

http://investors.vislink.com/investors/people

Market cap is now less than what they paid for Pebble Beach in 2014.

When I read the words VCP... time to keep looking for opportunities elsewhere.

2
Avatar for JohnEustace

Paul,
How do you square this with your holding in £VCP?

2
Avatar for Paul Scott

Hi John,

Re your query on Victoria (LON:VCP) - I think it's all down to what results are achieved.

In the case of VCP, its strategy seems to have been spectacularly successful - just look at the financial results. That's why I hold shares in it! Profit is going through the roof.

So if Directors deliver results, then they're worth backing.

Paul.

1
Avatar for mendelsohnf

re Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM)

Like most African agri businesses, Zambeef aren't too bothered about welfare standards that apply in the EU / UK. They own one of the largest battery hen farms (factories, more like) in southern Africa.
I wouldn't touch these shares on those grounds alone.

5
Avatar for jjis

Hi Paul,
While you're at it you could update your bit about 1pm (LON:OPM) who had a trading update which was in line & included this great comment by the Chairman - ""Trading and financial results for the first quarter ended 31 August 2016, were in line with management's expectations. This period included the "Brexit" referendum decision, which has in fact had no overall impact on business activity to date, reflecting the broad spectrum of SME sectors the Company serves through its three subsidiary entities, Onepm Finance, Academy Leasing and Bradgate Business Finance Limited."



0
Avatar for jjis

Hi Paul I was surprised to see this morning that Brighton Pier Brighton Pier (LON:PIER) was listed. On checking the results I see it seems to have come about from some kind of reverse takeover of the former Eclectic Bars. Furthermore I see that Luke Johnson is now involved and seems to want to turn it into a destination venue group and be a potential consolidator. Looks like it could be interesting and since you live in that area I guess you may have more of a view on the viability of the pier. Finally I see they do also apparently have rooms for hire for meetings and catering facilities so it might even work for your Sharesoc meetings if you don't find your current venue up to scratch at some point. 

Hope this might be of interest / helpful to you - have a great weekend. I do not hold the shares only came across it this morning out of curiosity.

Regards

Jamie

2
Avatar for Paul Scott

Hi Jamie,

Yes that's right, Brighton Pier (LON:PIER) is a Luke Johnson vehicle, which bought the Palace Pier in Brighton, and tacked it onto what was Eclectic Bars. I went to a meeting where LJ gave a short talk to explain his plans for PIER. He described it as wanting to make it into a "mini Merlin".

He's a brilliant entrepreneur of course, so PIER shares certainly deserve a LJ premium.
I'll take a look at the latest accounts now, and will add a section to today's report.

Regards, Paul.

2
Avatar for JohnEustace

I remember one of his Sunday Times articles about it. I think the issue he had in Eclectic Bars was that students and recent graduates are drinking less now that they are burdened with huge debts so he is looking to develop an alternative leisure offering.

0
Avatar for bsharman

I'd be F'ING fuming if I was still a Vislink (LON:VLK) shareholder and I feel extremely sorry for those that still hold here. The "value creation plan" became a "value destruction plan" by the management, who have lost all credibility. How they managed to destroy this business would make an interesting business school dissertation. I managed to get out as soon as the management announced the ""Value"" ""creation"" scheme but I've had other investments in the past which have gone as badly wrong. I'd be interested to hear from those that have a system of red flags if Vislink (LON:VLK) was exposed as being in danger.
Have a great weekend,
Ben

4
Avatar for Rusty2

I was lucky I sold out at 60p so I did make about 50%, I sold because of valuation having listen to Paul's opinion. Vislink (LON:VLK) seemed to go wrong when this VCP was announced. I would interested in Paul Rosier's views now as he was quite a strong supporter of VLK last year.

0
Avatar for FREng

Perhaps there should be a law that all Value Creation Plans must be symmetrical, so that the management have to pay the shareholders for any value destruction.

9
Avatar for Maddox

John Rosier capitulated back in August: " Vislink (VLK) issued a profit warning early in the month and I did what I should have done a year ago. I cut the holding, realising a significant loss, and reinvested the proceeds into stocks that I think have better prospects. I experienced the usual feelings of tranquillity and relief at no longer having to see, or worry about, this dog in my portfolio. "

http://www.investorschronicle.co.uk/2016/08/19/shares/private-investor-s-diary-a-summer-spree-tPEj4L1WkBwJC8GjaG89AP/article.html

Similarly, IC's Simon Thompson persisted in tipping VLK despite acknowledging the greedy VCP scheme. He bailed out with a SELL recommendation on the 6th July.

2
Avatar for Rusty2

Thanks for that, I'm no longer a subscriber to IC so did not see that. I rather fell out with Simon Thompson over Globo and few others like Stanley Gibbons (LON:SGI). Yes Simon does tend to support his tips all the way down.


I see his has a large stake in Crawshaw (LON:CRAW).

0
Avatar for TMFMayn

"I managed to get out as soon as the management announced the ""Value"" ""creation"" scheme but I've had other investments in the past which have gone as badly wrong. I'd be interested to hear from those that have a system of red flags if Vislink (LON:VLK) was exposed as being in danger. "

If you have bought loads of shares that have since gone "badly wrong", then it could be very useful to go back through them all and see if there is a common denominator that's creating the aggro. True, nobody likes to revisit their mistakes -- but prospering in the market is just as much about avoiding losers as it is picking winners.

Small-cap red flags can include:

* too much debt vs profit
* poor profit-to-cash conversion (especially too much cash being absorbed into working capital -- i.e. customers not paying, stock going unsold etc)
* substantial tangible/intangible capex and consistently much greater than the associated depreciation/amortisation charged against earnings
* frequent and/or significant acquisitions (especially where the purchase cost is greater than the annual profit)
* poor/haphazard past operating record
* dependence on handful of or powerful group of customers
* dependence on single/few products, with significant R&D required to remain competitive
* operating in an industry that is suffering obvious structural decline (e.g. newspapers)
* unproven or colourful or greedy management
* a chief exec without direct hands-on experience of the product or industry (i.e. avoid financial engineers and accountants turned bosses)
* anything you read where the main bull case is based on a "cheap valuation" or "turnaround potential", and skirts around any business qualities
* anything foreign

Looking back through the archives from 2013...
http://www.stockopedia.com/content/vislink-vlk-discussion-and-information-thread-74467/

...it seems VLK caught the attention due to its valuation, net cash position, stated financial targets and apparent market leadership in certain product areas. Looking back I wonder if that market leadership was really genuine, given the business had apparently been a "serial disappointer under previous management".

During 2013, VLK's current boss had only been in the job for two years, so I guess we could have in hindsight waited until his abilities at VLK became a little clearer. Also, a quick check on his CV showed a colourful history at a previous role:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/anite-chief-executive-ousted-after-warning-105794.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/2770631/Anite-under-fire-for-pay-packages.html

Ah, so perhaps that was the main red flag that should have kept everybody out of VLK in the first place.

So, try and recall why you bought your losers, then write down what caused each to implode, and then see if that could have been spotted when you bought. Usually the warning signs were already flashing.

16
Avatar for TMFMayn

Me again.

Just noticed that VLK shares were c30p back in 2013
http://www.stockopedia.com/content/vislink-vlk-discussion-and-information-thread-74467/

...and appeared to touch 60p last year. So perhaps some people did well on this share before the real problems emerged. But it is instructive to read through the above link, and the further links, to see the story unfold and read why people had initially bought etc. A lot of it centres on 'value'.

0
Avatar for Rusty2

Yes Paul and I both held and did quite well, it's one that went down quite quickly though, some shares you really need to keep an eye on.

1
Avatar for JohnEustace

You and I sold at the same time - that "value creation" plan was certainly a big red flag.
My biggest take-out from it was the one highlighted by TMFMayn - the need to carefully check the previous track record of management to see whether they have created value for shareholders or just themselves.
The alignment of management and shareholder interests is a strong reason to favour companies where the founders or their families have large stakes as recommended by Lord Lee among others.

2
Avatar for yamaha865

Surely Avesco should be gearing up a bit to fund expansion or else pay some special divis. Cant see being debt free is the most efficient structure at the moment.

1
Avatar for John Cannadine

Interesting announcement from Avesco (LON:AVS) - they seem to be following the script and focusing on the Creative Technology division of the company. Time for a rerate?

0
Avatar for Damien84

Good afetnoon Paul

A company called Treatt (TET) put out an upbeat trading statement today stating that they will be 'comfortably ahead. This one has been on a watchlist of mine since 2013 and has never looked the right price to buy until today so i took some on the opening bell.

Its a £109M market cap company and describes itself as One of the worlds longest established ingredient solutions provider to the flavour, fragrance and personal-care industries. A sector thats in favour imo.

I think broker forcasts are for £85.5M revenue and about £8.3M PTP. There will be a currency headwind of about £0.5M and a one off charge of £0.9M to me the shares look like they may re-rate a bit higher and im targeting about 250p as a short term trade. Whould love to know your opinion of the company.

Another company Zambeef produce (ZAM) issued a very bullish statement this morn but i admit to knowing absolutly nothing about it. But on first glance they look cheap!

Have a nice weekend.

2
Avatar for Paul Scott

Hi Damien,

If you refresh your page, I've recently added a section about the positive update today from Treatt (LON:TET)

As regards Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) - the clue is in the name! I'm bargepole on nearly all overseas companies on AIM, because they nearly all go wrong, sooner or later.

Regards, Paul.

3
Avatar for Rusty2

Yes Treatt (LON:TET) has been on my watchlist for a while now, still not bought any. One thing that has put me off buying in the past is the relocation plans, has there been any developments?

Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) I would be wary off, I remember there were in IC shares of the year a few years ago, nearly sank them, think they do put out bullish statements (pun intended).

0
Get the free newsletter