Analyse your stocks in seconds
Expert insights you can understand
Improve the odds of your stock picks
Generate investing ideas fast
Track & improve your Portfolio
Time your trades better with charts
Explore all the featuresStockopedia contains every insight, tool and resource you need to sort the super stocks from the falling stars.
In this week's Stockopedia Strategy Map article, Ed introduced the concept of Momentum. Momentum is the tendency for medium-term winners to keep doing well. A typical Momentum strategy looks at the share price performance from 12 months to one month ago. (In the very short term, share prices tend to mean revert rather than trend, so the last month is ignored.) A market-neutral strategy buys the top performers and shorts the worst performers, but a Momentum strategy can be implemented successfully on the long side only. Momentum is pervasive and has been shown to work across multiple time periods, geographies and asset classes.
It is generally accepted that Momentum generates excess returns because investors under-react to fundamental changes in company performance. This may be due to a psychological bias where investors dislike buying something they could have bought more cheaply earlier. I certainly suffer from this bias. However, the momentum effect may also be due to the under-reaction of company management to positive changes in their business performance.
These effects are relatively short-lived. As this chart from a study called Factors from Scratch shows, high momentum stocks tend to exhibit higher than average EPS growth over the next year:
However, that the EPS growth ends up significantly below market averages after a year. Momentum strategies require regular rebalancing into the most recent winners.
In academic studies, Momentum has been shown to generate higher risk-adjusted returns than either Value or Quality, making it a key component of the Stockopedia StockRank. Unfortunately, there is a trade-off for this superior performance. The strategy undergoes periods of very rapid underperformance, so rapid they are known as Momentum Crashes.
Momentum crashes tend to occur at the end of a bear market, when trends reverse rapidly, catching out those who rely on the recent price action to make investment decisions. As the 2022 study Isolating Momentum Crashes by Maik Dierkes and Jan Krupski, notes:
Since 1926, there have been several momentum crashes that feature short but persistent periods of highly negative returns. From June to August 1932 the momentum portfolio lost about 91%, followed by a second drawdown in April to July 1933. Another prominent crash took place in 2009 when Momentum lost more than 73% within a period of three months.
A 2016 paper called Momentum Crashes by Kent Daniel and Tobias J. Moskowitz listed the most significant monthly percentage drawdowns (WMLt) for a momentum strategy:
These types of rapid reversals are far too severe for most investors to bear without abandoning a strategy. Anyone in any doubt about this should imagine their current portfolio reducing to a quarter of its value in a month and needing to deliver a 4x return just to break even. While recent difficult markets have presented challenges for almost all types of investors, this drawdown is on another level.
While not as rapid or deep as the 2009 fall, the Stockopedia pure long-only UK momentum screen has underperformed the FTSE All share by 40% over the last two years, causing significant pain for those who follow this strategy:
This shows that while momentum is a factor that all investors should probably consider in their investing decisions, it is certainly not a panacea for outperforming the market. If investors could avoid the momentum crashes, however, it may make it a much easier strategy to follow.
The momentum factor detailed in academic studies goes long stocks with the strongest medium-term price increase, and shorts stocks with the largest medium-term price decrease. A long-only momentum strategy that doesn't short the losers delivers almost all of the long-term returns with added simplicity. A long-only strategy may also avoid some of the worst drawdowns of a momentum strategy, which typically occur as the general market trend reverses. For example, those who were short losing stocks when the market bottomed in March 2009 faced a period of significant losses since the weakest stocks rebounded most strongly.
Of course, this means that the momentum strategy is no longer market-neutral and may face drawdowns with the general market. However, these types of drawdowns may be easier to manage, either through hedging or just psychologically (the losses will occur when all other investors are also facing drawdowns).
It turns out that the returns to the momentum factor vary significantly over time, as momentum crashes tend to occur in certain types of markets. Typically, at the end of bear markets. Of course, if one could accurately predict the start and end of bear markets, investors would have little need for any other strategy. However, some recent studies have identified some specific factors that help avoid momentum crashes.
For example, in a 2015 study called Momentum has its Moments, Pedro Barroso and Pedro Santa-Clara found a negative relationship between momentum volatility and subsequent returns—momentum volatility increases in times of momentum crashes. The authors suggest a strategy of volatility targeting to improve the Sharpe Ratio. This isn't an implementable strategy for the individual investor. However, if a momentum investor notices that the daily movements in their portfolio returns appear unusually large, this may be a time for them to step aside for a while.
In the Daniel and Moskowitz study, the full table of the worst monthly momentum performances also includes details of the market conditions in the run-up to the momentum crash. The fourth column shows the market returns versus two years previously. The fifth column shows the market return in the month that the momentum crash occurs. Almost exclusively, they show that the market was weak in the run-up to the crash but rebounded strongly in the month of the crash:
The authors developed a regression that predicted the returns to a momentum strategy based on a bear market indicator and the variance of the daily returns of the market over the 126 days prior. Times of high market volatility and being in a bear market were negative for the returns to momentum. When market volatility increases in a bear market, the chances of a momentum crash increase significantly.
The third notable paper is the one from Dierkes and Krupskimes, who developed a crash indicator based on three factors:
Again, if a momentum investor starts to see negative returns to their strategy during a rebound in a bear market, they should exit a momentum strategy with haste.
Finally, a recent paper found a link between Momentum crashes and 52-week high effects. The authors, Suk-Joon Byun and Byounghyun Jeon, say:
We find that a surge of investor speculation toward stocks far from their 52-week highs can partially explain the momentum crashes. If a momentum strategy is revised to be neutral on a 52-week high effect, momentum crashes are significantly attenuated and the revised strategy does not exhibit procyclical returns. Furthermore, the revised strategy generates a higher Sharpe ratio in different sub-periods and international stock markets.
This means that a momentum strategy may underperform when the strategy of buying stocks at 52-week highs underperforms. Again, the root cause appears to be the same: a rapid rebound after a prolonged bear market, but this finding may give investors another way of identifying these risky periods.
Quant fund Robeco uses an alternative version of momentum that uses analysts' revisions and news sentiment in addition to price measures. They find that this alternative definition reduces the drawdowns. As demonstrated by this chart graphing a particularly tricky period for momentum: November 2022 to February 2023:
This is what the Stockopedia Momentum Rank aims to do by including earnings momentum measures as well as pure price momentum. Full details of how the Momentum Rank is formed can be found here. However, as the recent performance of Robeco's Alternative Momentum and the Stockopedia Pure Momentum screen over the last two years shows, investors may be better off simply exiting (or even reversing) a momentum strategy when the chances of positive returns are low.
Momentum is a strategy that is pervasive across geographies and asset classes. So, while one market may be prone to a momentum crash, another will be trending nicely. The warning signs of a momentum crash appear to be the same: negative two-year returns, positive one-month returns and increased volatility of either markets or momentum strategies. As such, the UK small and mid-cap markets seem particularly prone to a rapid bear market reversal and hence a momentum crash, especially if volatility picks up. UK and US large caps appear less dangerous for momentum investors to engage with:
However, as always, when their own money is at risk, momentum investors should run their own numbers to look for these warning signs.
About Mark Simpson
Value Investor
Author of Excellent Investing: How to Build a Winning Portfolio. A practical guide for investors who are looking to elevate their investment performance to the next level. Learn how to play to your strengths, overcome your weaknesses and build an optimal portfolio.
Disclaimer - This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.
Great article Mark, need to reread a couple of times to really understand. Thanks, David
Thanks Ed. That lines up with the intuitive expectation that Value and Momentum are often negatively correlated. Although the authors calling a Value Bubble when the expectation is for "extreme value profits" is a little confusing. We normally expect bubbles to yield extremely negative outcomes not positive ones!
It is well known that small cap value tends to be the biggest winner when a bear market turns, which is the danger zone for momentum. I'd imagine that a strategy of long momentum until the danger signs appear and then long small cap value would have a pretty good Sharpe.
“a psychological bias where investors dislike buying something they could have bought more cheaply earlier”
This is what confuses me about momentum strategies. If most of us suffer the bias of not wanting to buy something we could have bought more cheaply earlier, why does the price rise???
Momentum crashes are historically a feature of long/short portfolios as loser stocks (that are being shorted) rebound the strongest at the end of a bear market causing the loses on the short side. My feeling is that few private investors operate this hedge-fund like investing style, so I doubt they would be heavily effected - since most long only portfolios will all rise at the end of a bear market sell off (albeit the biggest losers tend to rebound the most). i.e. no crash for the long only investor.
Factor investing is largely a long term game (particularly value and quality) but it is apt to fail for (long) periods whatever the style and it is why any investing style is hard. Almost all Value, Momentum, Quality styles have underperformed the FTSE All-share index since the end of summer of 2021. Will that continue, and for how long? Difficult to know!
Doctor Dave, You ask " If most of us suffer the bias of not wanting to buy something we could have bought more cheaply earlier, why does the price rise???" I t would rise in response to positive news flow, such as good results, contract wins, or a positive outlook statement. The full response to such news can take weeks to have have its full response. So the rise which occurs almost immediately after the news can continue for some time as gradually more & more traders or investors become aware of the news and buy the shares.
A good example of a re-rating because of a slow reaction to good news over the last 12 months is ME International (LON:MEGP). It has has impressive Momentum, a VM rank of 84 and I see Paul has reviewed it positively this morning.
Disclosure - MEGP is my biggest holding
*Past performance is no indicator of future performance. Performance returns are based on hypothetical scenarios and do not represent an actual investment.
This site cannot substitute for professional investment advice or independent factual verification. To use Stockopedia, you must accept our Terms of Use, Privacy and Disclaimer & FSG. All services are provided by Stockopedia Ltd, United Kingdom (company number 06367267). For Australian users: Stockopedia Ltd, ABN 39 757 874 670 is a Corporate Authorised Representative of Daylight Financial Group Pty Ltd ABN 77 633 984 773, AFSL 521404.
Great piece - will comment properly soon. Interestingly I saw a recent paper called "Value Bubbles" - which tend to happen at the same time as momentum crashes. So V+M work nicely together!