Analyse your stocks in seconds
Expert insights you can understand
Improve the odds of your stock picks
Generate investing ideas fast
Track & improve your Portfolio
Time your trades better with charts
Explore all the featuresStockopedia contains every insight, tool and resource you need to sort the super stocks from the falling stars.
In a bull market, when valuations are expanding and the market is pricing in a better future, there’s no faster road to profit than buying momentum stocks. When a stock is on the move, there’s a good chance it will continue in the same direction, especially if the power of institutional buying is behind it.
"An object at rest tends to stay at rest and an object in motion tends to stay in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force." - Isaac Newton
In this latest in The Strategy Map series, I'll be giving you an overview of momentum investing, and introduce two approaches to capturing its rewards - the active trader approach of buying breakout stocks, versus the more systematic approach of buying and holding portfolios of higher strength stocks.
Momentum investing isn’t for everyone. It requires a watchful mindset, and a willingness to prioritise technical analysis (price action and sentiment) over fundamental analysis (valuation and company accounts). While a value investor seeks to buy stocks cheap, often buying after declines, the momentum investor seeks to “buy high and sell higher”. If your belief system rests on a deep value margin of safety, you may find momentum investing challenging.
This is an active approach that requires regular dealing and a keen attention to risk management. It's common to use stop losses to protect capital, and cut positions as soon as trends reverse. If you don't have the ruthless streak, and prefer the idea of marrying compounding quality stocks for life, you will want to look away now.
Nonetheless understanding how to read the runes of price and volume action provides invaluable lessons for all investors. Let’s get to grips with this compelling approach to beating the market and put Newton's Law of Motion to work.
One of my favourite stock market stories was told by the globe-trotting Hungarian-Canadian ballet dancer, Nicholas Darvas in his classic 1960 "How I made $2,000,000 in the stock market".
Darvas's book may be more than 60 years old, but his tale reads timelessly. He made every mistake in his early years, buying on tips, trying to play it safe, over-relying on fundamentals, until he realised through keen observation that price and volume action held the key to sustainable profits.
Stocks did not fly like balloons in any direction. As if attracted by a magnet, they had a defined upward or downward trend which, once established, tended to continue. Within this trend stocks moved in a series of frames, or what I began to call "boxes".
Darvas observed that stocks met upper resistance as they rise in price, but gained support on reversals. He’d buy breakouts at the top end of each box, use strict risk management, and try to reap the rewards. He'd sell "when the boxes started to go into reverse". His simple approach worked, especially when focusing on stocks in strong industries with improving earnings trends. The $2m he accumulated was all done while travelling the world performing ballet, with financial magazines delivered by airmail, and communication with his broker by telegram - so no one can make any excuses!
One anecdote does not make a law, but Darvas is not alone. There are many tales of the fortunes made by momentum traders - Jesse Livermore making billions in todays money through tape reading in the 1920s, Bill O'Neil becoming the youngest ever person to buy a seat on the New York Stock Exchange from breakout profits, while an experiment by famed commodity trader Richard Dennis turned 23 regular people into trend following immortals - the "Turtle Traders".
The quants have since proved emphatically that strong stocks consistently beat weak stocks. In 1993, Jegadeesh and Titman published a groundbreaking study titled “Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers”. They found that recent winning stocks continued to beat recent losers by an average of more than 12% per year. Eugene Fama, winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics, and the king of academic finance, initially rejected these ideas, but in 2008 finally conceded:
We'll discuss the risks inherent in momentum investing later, but for now, let's go and find them. Screening the market for strong, momentum stocks is actually remarkably simple.
Most momentum investors will not even consider a stock for purchase unless its shares are already beating the market over some recent period. Here are a few ways of measuring strength.
Don’t forget that Stockopedia’s Momentum Rank can be used as an all-weather approach to finding strong momentum shares. This composite field incorporates some of the measures above into a Price Momentum Rank, but also assesses the sentiment around the share by including a weighting to Earnings Momentum (whether the brokers are increasing their forecasts and whether the company is beating those forecasts). To use the Momentum Rank - remember it’s scaled between zero (weak) and 100 (strong). To find the best 10% ranked stocks in the market, use “Momentum Rank > 90”.
Here’s an example stock screen of “Price Momentum Basics” that you can review and copy.
Many of the advocates of this style of investing - from Darvas, to Bill O’Neil and Mark Minervini - stress the importance of ensuring that price moves are backed up by genuine accelerations in earnings and sales power. This helps avoid the danger of investing in "momentum traps" - temporarily overhyped shares, without any substance backing their story.
Screen for stocks that have improving earnings or sales growth - especially in the most recent reporting period. Even better if they have news saying they are trading “ahead of expectations”. The key is to build a watchlist of "leading stocks in leading sectors".
Most momentum investors come to realise that the most promising momentum stocks often trade at a premium valuation to the market. Bill O'Neil once did a study of hundreds of the greatest stock market winners and discovered they all began their biggest moves on high P/E Ratios. From 1953 to 1985 they began at an average P/E of 20, whereas in the internet bubble this was 36+.
For a breakout momentum investor, the key is knowing when to buy and when to sell. So we'll seek to answer those questions now. I'm going to lean heavily on Stan Weinstein's excellent work in "Secrets for Profiting in Bull and Bear Markets", as the lessons he tells have broad application not just for momentum investors, but anybody seeking lower risk entry and exit points in shares.
Weinstein identified four stages in a typical, long-term share price lifecycle. These stages can repeat again and again in shares, and are sketched out below.
Ultimately, momentum investors seek to participate strongly in Stage 2 stocks - whether by buying the initial breakout from Stage 1, or later breakouts in Stage 2. These are the shares beating the market, and showing strong relative strength. The aim is to have sold out of the stock before or at the start of Stage 4 before any significant losses.
Weinstein identifies that "Investors" (holding for 12 months+) will want to be buying at the end of Stage 1 when the stock first breaks out. In practice this can be challenging, but stocks often stay in Stage 2 for up to 5 intermediate "bases" all of which can provide good entry points for traders, although the risk increases the higher the stock goes. The key is identifying stocks with extremely strong volume surges, as it's an indicator of strong, possibly institutional demand.
The initial breakout is prone to failure, and can lead to losses. Buying on the first pullback after the breakout is a less risky time to enter. The odds are more substantially in your favour, but you can miss out on some of the most propulsive winners if you wait. Buying the initial breakout is only recommended when there are significant confirming catalysts (fundamental or otherwise).
"Traders" (who hold for shorter periods) are likely to wait until there is already a confirmed "Stage 2" trend. They will wait for the first base after the trend has started before participating. Stocks in stage 2 can base multiple times before topping, and often all are tradeable, but risk heightens on the way up. Don't participate if the moving average has levelled off as it may signify Stage 3.
Mark Minervini only ever buys stage 2 stocks - he suggested a stage 2 trend filter which we've mostly replicated in this Minervini-esque stock screen that you can review and copy. Minervini has become known for his Volatility Contraction Pattern (VCP), which is essentially a wedging pattern between support and resistance in a base. It's illustrated above as a wedge pattern where the support line rises towards resistance. This is a good indicator that selling pressure is dissipating, and buyers are soaking up the supply.
Firstly, every good breakout trader uses stop losses. Stop losses are loathed by Buffett-esque investors, because they believe if you know the company well enough, any drop in price is a chance to buy more. But momentum investors use stop losses as a form of insurance - it's a premium paid to protect starting capital.
Never let small losses turn into large losses. A 10% loss requires an 11% gain to return to parity, but a 50% loss requires a 100% gain for parity.
Weinstein recommends placing protective stop losses at the most recent support line below the breakout point. This is fairly loose, but respects the natural volatility of the share. Minervini never lets a loss be more than 8%, but he tends to trade larger, more liquid stocks that trade tightly. If you are dealing in small caps you would need to set wider stops. Just remember to keep losses small.
Secondly, many of the proponents of the breakout momentum style encourage you to “concentrate your eggs in one basket and watch that basket like a hawk”. This is a risky, low-diversification approach, but can pay off handsomely in bull markets if you manage your exits carefully. As this style aims for leading stocks in leading groups there can often be sector concentration - so beware. Even if you are highly attentive, it’s sensible to diversify across sectors, and own a range of stocks. Minervini, O’Neil and Darvas might promote 5-8 stock portfolios, but you know the risks. There’s plenty of stories out there of overly concentrated portfolios not working out. Once again, any attachment to shares can be fatal. Be ruthless.
The basis of all momentum and trend following profits is to run winners and cut losses. You can buy many more losers than winners, but still show big profits, if the profits on a few of your winners are huge. So how do you run your winners, but still have sell discipline to protect the profits?
Weinstein recommends raising your sell stops as the price moves upwards on its trend. This is essentially a trailing stop loss, but is best set manually. Here's how it works.
While this sounds like a lot of work, this process will only need to be done a few times over the course of a year or two of uptrend in a strong name.
Mark Minervini was highly influenced by Weinstein, but as his process puts him into the biggest winners in bull markets, he often has to deal with "buying climaxes" - where stocks have parabolic runs. In these scenarios it can be best to sell into the strength, as the likelihood of rapid reversal is high. If a stock gets 70% above it's 30 Week MA, it's a good sign of a pending climax top.
What is particularly powerful about these selling approaches is that attentive momentum investors end up selling individual positions on weakness early in bear markets. They are rarely exposed to the deep drawdowns that occur in fully-invested portfolios.
It’s quite possible that you don’t want to spend your days actively looking at the markets for breakout stocks, but still want to build momentum into an investment approach. Well there is a more passive way of putting its power to work for you. That’s by using a rules-based, systematic approach. In the interests of brevity (this is a long piece), I am not going to go into as much depth, but will cover some basics.
A simpler, more fully invested approach is based on my own No Admin Portfolio System (the NAPS). It can be implemented in only a few hours per year and has been remarkably effective over the last decade. The published NAPS Portfolio combines quality and value with momentum by using the StockRanks, but a momentum only approach has outperformed the combined style.
Some steps to implement are as follows:
Generally there are quality businesses in this portfolio that have good price strength as our momentum measure includes "earnings momentum". Here’s how such an approach has fared over recent years. More than a 16% annualised return over 8 years. The median size of the stocks across the portfolios was £2.3bn with an average yield of 2.2% and spread of 1.2%.
If you are looking for a good read on this style, do check out Andreas Clenow’s “Stocks on the Move”. He outlines a systematic approach to investing in US large-cap, momentum stocks that could be followed by any investor, albeit with a little calculation. Taking this approach doesn’t require any checking of news stories, fundamental analysis nor even chart reading. It’s a clean, price-only approach to the market.
First do no harm. Before you set out on this adventure and get too excited about every chart you see with the slightest uptick, please do read these caveats.
This has been another extensive piece, and it's a real challenge to try to bring so much source material into a coherent 15-minute read. To be honest, these topics need books rather than articles. If you've read this far, I hope I've succeeded in giving value for your time. Please do comment below, and let me know your own experiences and anything important that the community ought to know that I've had to miss out - intentionally or not.
I do encourage you to continue your learning further in some of the following books. There are many more good reads, but here are a few essentials.
About Edward Croft
Co-founder and CEO here at Stockopedia.com. I was a wealth manager, then full-time private investor before setting up Stockopedia. I believe passionately in the power of data-driven investing to improve investment results. Oddly obsessed with the StockRanks.
Disclaimer - This is not financial advice. Our content is intended to be used and must be used for information and education purposes only. Please read our disclaimer and terms and conditions to understand our obligations.
Ed, You have excelled in explaining the screening opportunities for the Momentum phenomenon. I have looked into the Davas Box concept in the past but concluded that drawing the Boxes is subjective. Are you, or others aware of decent software which will do this automatically, removing the human interpretation?
Yes Darvas boxes are pretty subjective. There are Darvas Box plots in some software packages. I'm pretty sure we could add one ourself - but again, every new feature requires explanation and so on. The challenge with product management is that you need to ensure good adoption of features to carry the maintenance cost, and every bell and whistle you add creates more user interface complexity that needs explained. There's a reason the iPhone is so successful - reduce and simplify. Give more of what everyone needs.
I have some good ideas in the chart patterns arena - but we have a lot to build in the backlog as I'm sure everyone knows !
Good article Ed, a very good summary of the ideas of the principal proponents of trend and momentum stock investing.
Unfortunately, with its primary focus on factor investing, Stockopedia simply isn't geared up to finding breakout stocks. David Talbot mentioned the inflexibility of the Volume Surge metric earlier, another would be the 52-week high filter - why can't we select another time period such as six or three months? Look at the chart of Apple from 2009, it broke out from a base on 23/3/09 when it closed at 385 - but the 52-wk high was only reached on 3/8/09 when it closed at 594, after and increase of 54%. Apple would still have been a good buy then, but for most stocks that would be the bulk of the move, and by that time almost all of the reward-to risk has gone. You can see this on the Minervini screen you link to in your article - all of the charts show shares which have already "left the station", and anyone using that screen for buying decisions is probably doomed to disappointment. Without more customisable screening of price action, it would be difficult for an investor/trader to use Stockopedia as their main source of ideas.
I used Stockopedia extensively (and successfully, thankyou!) during the years 2012-2016, but after that time factor investing based on fundamentals began to be less successful and growth and momentum seemed to take over. Since then I have continued to use Stockopedia regularly, but primarily for confirmation of the fundamental strength of ideas from other sources. And yes, most of those were breakouts and swing points after pullbacks, as in this article. Stockopedia has remained invaluable, but not for the origination of ideas. Factor investing has not gone away permanently, and it (and particularly the value factor) might make a comeback perhaps after this bear market or perhaps once we return to a more normal market regime with above-zero inflation and interest rates - Asness has written on this recently, as you know (eg https://www.aqr.com/Insights/R...). What I will be interested in is whether the traditional Fama factors of Quality and Value can be successfully combined with the methodology and risk management of trend-following, if Growth goes out of fashion (or just becomes too rare). And I'd love to be able to use Stockopedia's factor analysis for that!
One problem with the writers you mention is that they are US-based investors, and really writing about that market. It's a bit different when a small-cap stock over there which is off the institutional radar is nevertheless valued at $5bn and highly liquid! In the UK there simply aren't enough candidates which are liquid enough for that kind of trading - for example the recommended stop-loss levels of 8-10% espoused by O'Neil and Minervini would get you chopped out of anything below the FTSE100 pretty quickly, never mind anything on AIM.
I know you're familiar with the work of Jase at tradingbases.co.uk. I hope you'll forgive the mentioning of a competitor site, but he's only got about a dozen subscribers including myself. He has a workable strategy for UK smallcaps, and I wish you could find a way of working with him! His primary emphasis is risk management and portfolio management - stock selection and entry criteria are almost secondary - a point which all traders such as Minervini emphasise as the foundation of a successful trading strategy. Usual holding period 3m-2yrs, longer than most "investors". Market regime filters (e.g. Nick Radge) meaning that he's currently only about 50% invested, and only about 5% of capital is at risk if all stop levels are hit. Risk management through fixed-fractional position-sizing (see Van Tharp) so that on each trade only a certain percentage of the total portfolio value is at risk. Stock selection and entry criteria adapted from Bill O'Neil. Stop-losses and trailing stops adapted from Weinstein. Pyramiding of successful ideas and all the other stuff you'll find in Schwager. And so on. And lots of daily videos which you need to watch at 2x speed, but which really drum in the principles of risk management. It's boring, but it works.
Hopefully portfolio-based factor investing will make a comeback on its own - I'm looking forward to being able to set up sub-portfolios with different strategies and timescales, so being able to go back to the Stockopedia rankings would be brilliant if factor investing makes a comeback. But if reacting to recent price action and risk management based on recent volatility continue to be important, the screens need to allow more customisable filters before Stockopedia could be the prime source for any trend-following strategy, no matter how valuable and powerful its fundamental and factor screening may be.
Outstanding Ed, thank you. Momentum and charts are relatively unfamiliar to me so this piece has added considerably to my broader knowledge and I'm motivated to explore further if only to learn. I very much like the direct writing style of this piece too.
I also picked up a couple of your recent book recommendations ('Equity Edge' by Jeavons and the recently released 'Four Ways to Beat the Market' by Hall), and given that you and your team, same many subscribers are well read, wonder if Stockopedia might produce a library page within the Book section of the Learning resource centre that highlights recommended reading by style, topic etc.?
Thanks again,
TEIN
TradingView has an excellent Darvas Box Indicator. He used between 70 and 90% leverage back in the 50s. That was how he accumulated so much wealth in a short period + a few lucky breaks
Thanks for a brilliant article. I find an adaptive moving average specifically Kaufman's (KAMA). A weekly 30MA will lag a price change by some margin while you might miss a price moving quickly. The KAMA adjusts to the volatility and price change quicker than the latter and you can get in on a trade earlier on
Very good article Ed, thank you.
One twist I have on my screen is the 10d/3m volume surge < 0%... i.e. I'm looking for volume drying up, within a base.
"from contraction comes expansion" as they say... so rather than look for a volume surge which has already happened, I try and identify where the next surge could be occurring.
Worth playing about with, I do find some interesting candidates this way.
@JASVFS - unfortunately we all suffer from the "disposition effect" - which is that we're predisposed to feel the pain of losses 2x as much as the joy of gains. So we tend not to crystallise losses (as we don't think paper losses are real) and grab at gains (to pocket the win). Got to train ourselves against this at all times !!!
Thanks Ed, this is a really excellent article about momentum investing. Whilst I am interested in how traders like Darvas and Minervini have mastered momentum investing I do think their methodologies and level of success would be very difficult to emulate without watching the market closely and without years invested in mastering swing trading (in Minervini's case). I am much more interested in the systematic methods you present using the Stockopedia Momemtum Rank to build and update a portfolio of stocks using the resources readily available on your excellent platform.
The results speak for themselves, and have beat the FTSE All-share by a wide margin over the last eight years. However, am I the only one who would find this systematic approach difficult to follow in practice? My main concern is the sneaking suspicion that at any given time I might be holding a lot of stocks that might give me sleepless nights. This may not in fact be true but I have a vision of some of the high momentum stocks from past years that go along the lines of... microcap mining/oil stocks with zero revenue, a blue sky story and a steeply rising price chart (apt to collapse at a moment's notice following an RNS). Or an overseas AIM listed Israeli/Greek software company with opaque accounting practices and generous incentives to management, that may not be quite what it seems.
Without being able to reconstruct historical portfolios from prior years (and kick the tyres of the companies it selects at the time) I think it would be very difficult to trust a backtest like this.
If I could do historical screens (using the Stockopedia database) to look back through portfolios of the past I might gain more confidence in using a systematic screen like this to construct and invest in such a portfolio (I presume this would require a lot of additional hard work by you and your staff to allow this to happen). But until then I think I will stick with a higher quality portfolio approach and sleep more soundly in my bed! But thanks anyway, great article.
Not sure any system has done well in the last two years. Maybe “large cap defensive”. I don’t know anyone who has had good returns since Nov 21.
The point is momentum stocks have underperformed most others. Only QV and Growth have been worse.
The52 week high momentum screen is down 32% over 2 years. If the index is up then some stocks most be performing. Large caps have fared much better than small caps. Energy and some Ultilities have done very well.
A lot of Momentum traders don't trade in these sorts of markets or at a reduced level, read Minervini, Weinstein etc, however the US markets are different. They probably would not trade in the UK anyway.
Hi Ed, I think there is a problem with the Top Value US shares: https://www.stockopedia.com/sc...
they have gone up considerably in the last 6 weeks. Maybe someone could check it out?
To echo Rusty's above point, I don't think there's an 'all weather' strategy and most of the successful names in trading, tailor their style to suit the market conditions. Stan Weinstein's 'Forest to the trees' method is to trade in the same direction as the sector & index, Bill O'Neil cautions that breakouts don't work in bear markets, others use macro data such as GDP, CPI & M2 to navigate market cycles. One of the most valuable lessons I've learned is that the best strategy in the world won't work if applied to the wrong market.
The US market I feel is better for breakouts, some of my technology shares have gone a bit balmy lately, not just NVIDIA (NSQ:NVDA) there have been plenty of others. If you look Minervini powerplays, there are 3 in the UK but 64 in the US. The UK are all small caps. The 52 week high momentum screen did well up to mid 2018, but since then has fallen back considerably, it is only up about 50% since inception, down from a peak around 150%, in 2018.
*Past performance is no indicator of future performance. Performance returns are based on hypothetical scenarios and do not represent an actual investment.
This site cannot substitute for professional investment advice or independent factual verification. To use Stockopedia, you must accept our Terms of Use, Privacy and Disclaimer & FSG. All services are provided by Stockopedia Ltd, United Kingdom (company number 06367267). For Australian users: Stockopedia Ltd, ABN 39 757 874 670 is a Corporate Authorised Representative of Daylight Financial Group Pty Ltd ABN 77 633 984 773, AFSL 521404.
Thank you.