Small Cap Value Report (Wed 12 September 2018) - WATR, FA., TEG, TPFG, OPM, GOAL

12th Sep '18 by Graham Neary

40 comments 11308 reads

Good morning!

I'm back from holidays in the Canaries, tanned and sunburnt and with great memories of beaches, water slides, camels, volcanoes, etc.

Paul has been productive in my absence and covered a big collection of shares in yesterday's report. He added quite a few in the evening - here's the link.

We have a busy RNS feed today. I'm looking at these shares:

Water Intelligence (LON:WATR)
Fireangel Safety Technology (LON:FA.)
Ten Entertainment (LON:TEG)
Property Franchise (LON:TPFG)
1pm (LON:OPM)
Goals Soccer Centres (LON:GOAL)

Water Intelligence (LON:WATR)

Share price: 345p (+4%)
No. of shares: 15 million
Market cap: £52 million

Interim Results

Water Intelligence, a leading provider of non-invasive leak detection and remediation services, is pleased to present its interim results for the period ended 30 June 2018.

This California-based business continues to show excellent growth. It uses acoustic and infrared technologies to pinpoint the location of water leaks (without needing to break through surfaces to find them).

revenues +39% ($11.8 million)
PBT up 49% ($1.26 million)

It's nice to see that the company reports its actual PBT first in the statement (before adjusted PBT).

Also, the adjustments to the accounts aren't huge. Adjusted PBT is also growing strongly and is not that much higher when compared with actual PBT.

Profits are described as "comfortably in line with expectations", which typically means at the higher end of the forecast range.

At the H1 trading update in July, the company confirmed that it was working toward the goal of $20 million of sales in 2018 and reaching $25 million of annualised sales in the near-term.

Today it says:

Given our consistency, we are confident that we should proceed full steam ahead towards our stated goal of passing $20 million in sales during 2018 and stretching towards $25 million in the near-term for a trailing twelve-month period.

While the growth in the core business is excellent in its own right, we also have a maiden profit from its UK-based services business.

The level of ambition remains encouraging - the company is…

Unlock with Facebook

Unlock with Google

or Unlock with your email

Already have an account?
Login here

PeterW

12th Sep '18

I PM (LON:OPM)

Hi Graham,

Though 1PM looks superficially very attractive I believe management only provision loans at 1%. This seems fine in the good times but I would have thought SMEs would need bigger provisions over their total lifecycle. Maybe 1PM management are very canny but without a long track record it strikes me as a bit of a leap of faith, unless you can time your investment in the shares carefully with the cycle! Love to hear your thoughts on this anyone.

Peter

Julianh

Thanks for that Mr Cool. That helps to reduce the anxiety.
I will probably do some more research as, aside from that red flag, Water Intelligence (LON:WATR) looks pretty good. I am happy to keep holding and have topped up a bit on today's continuation of good news.

mmarkkj777

Another vote for GAME Digital (LON:GMD) please.

It seems Martin Gibbs has the foresight (balls) to completely change the business model, where retained earnings from a retail cash cow are being re-invested into a new vision (a kind of digital Warhammer, where people meet, play and buy).

I can buy into his ideas. Interested in the feedback as to whether the numbers stack up.

Thanks.

SundayTrader

Is it worth a look at Charles Taylor (LON:CTR) six month results out today? It is a small cap, and SP gives it a reasonable Value score.

Confused picture in results - the highlights announce a 10% increase in adjusted profit, and do not mention a 10% decrease in adjusted eps. Not good PR in my opinion. I think the picture is one of absorbing a relatively expensive acquisition, and expansion bringing increases in costs to build future revenue. I hold.

Gromley

GAME Digital (LON:GMD) is worth discussing given their RNS (in frustration?)

I thought it was a bit odd that the company should be actively promoting this research note. Actually though I see that the non-regulatory RNS was published by Edison themselves and that they routinely "advertise" their research notes in this way.

I had genuinely not noticed that before, but I think it is really helpful. I like their research notes, they are detailed but easy to follow their assumptions and thinking. Also they are freely available. One does need to be aware however that this is because they are paid for by the companies in question; they do though seem to be impartial (you just need to keep in the back of your mind the risk that they might be tempted to pull their punches if criticising their clients.

I don't always necessarily agree with their conclusions though!

Their headline findings are two value GAME Digital (LON:GMD) at 75p / share based on the average of three different methods.

1. Peer comparison : 93p

They recognise that there are no particularly comparable businesses, but use US operator GameStop (similar to the legacy business) to give a 59p rating and three experiential companies (Games Workshop, Goals Soccer Centres & Focusrite) implying 126p.

My view would be that the second category might be the more appropriate, but with BELONG being at such an early stage they are not their yet, so it doesn't make to much sense to me to compare Game's predominantly legacy earnings with the valuation based on the future business model.

2. DCF : 61p

I absolutely get the fundamental correctness of the DCF approach. but the sensitivity to forecast assumptions mean that the answer can be whatever you want it to be imho.

3. Sum of parts : 71p

They value the legacy Game store business at 16p, BELONG at 23p and the cash-pile at 32p.

I have said on a number of occasions that I believe it is wrong to value Game's net cash balance as 'surplus'. I don't have any inside knowledge of their cash profile, but I am pretty certain that cash balances are much lower at other times of the year and that a significant amount of the net cash is actually embedded working capital.

So personally I am not really convinced by any of those models, but I do accept that the company does look "cheap" and that BELONG has the potential to be transformative.

There is lots more detail in the report and it is well worth a read. The key take away for me though was probably that they still forecast Game to be loss making at least as far out as FY 2020. That might not be unreasonable if viewing this as a growth company (BELONG still only being c. a third of the business by this stage).

For me though I think the 'jam' is too far off to give market much cause for excitement at this stage. I still consider it an interesting proposition, but I would really want to see stronger evidence of BELONG gaining traction before I would be too interested.

rpmeurope

Another warning from Trakm8 Holdings (LON:TRAK) I would like to hear thoughts on this one, it looks like it is in trouble?

Effortless Cool

Julian,

I started a discussion on Water Intelligence (LON:WATR) last year, which you may find useful as a start to your research. Apologies if you are already aware.

https://www.stockopedia.com/content/water-intelligence-the-long-story-195763/

abtan

The biggest reason I have never bought Water Intelligence (LON:WATR) is because of the (I believe) excessive remuneration of the executive chairman (Patrick de Sousa)

A quick look through the accounts gives the following

net profits, and
de Sousa's total remuneration"

respectively over the last few years:

2014: $380k / $325k
2015: $580k / $404k
2016: $480k / $447k
2017: $910k / $450k

That's a pretty big pay rise over 4 years ($325k --> $450k) and a HUGE remuneration for 1 person when compared with the net profit being achieved ($380k --> $910k).

Undeserved remuneration? Potentially not, given the growth being achieved, but I feel there's a strong case that as a public company the Executive Chairman is wrongly prioritising himself.

Also worth bearing in mind that there was a placing only 6 months ago for $3.6m, which doesn't fill me with confidence given the excessive remuneration over the last few years.

So sadly, despite all the amazing growth metrics, I will continue to remain out of Water Intelligence (LON:WATR)

JohnEustace

A mid morning announcement that the CEO at N Brown (LON:BWNG) is stepping down.
"The Board of N Brown Group Plc announces that it is to commence the search for a new Chief Executive. Angela Spindler who has led the business through a period of significant change and its transition towards an online retailer will leave her role at the end of September."

abtan,

I think you raise a legitimate concern over Patrick DeSouza's remuneration at Water Intelligence (LON:WATR), although I'm not sure of the source of your $910k figure for total remuneration in 2017. Perhaps you could direct me to it?

A couple of points to bear in mind are: 1) as well as Chairman, he is effectively working as the Chief Executive, so there is no additional CEO salary to bear; and 2) it is effectively a US company, for which excessive remuneration for leadership functions seems to be the norm.

That being said, he is very much the dominant individual in the business and does not seem shy about looking out for his own interests. If you are not comfortable with the risk that brings, then it is sensible not to invest.

Howard Marx

Yes Abtan, there appear to be some potentially serious corporate governance issues at Water Intelligence (LON:WATR)

Basically it appears to be a one man show. The Directors are listed in the Accounts as:

Patrick DeSouza Executive Chairman
John Weigold Executive Director

David Silverstone Non-Executive Director
Michael Reisman Non-Executive Director
Laura Hills Non-Executive Director

No mention is made of the split between Chairman, CEO & FD.

The other Exec Director Weigold doesn't appear to have contributed anything to the Report & Acounts, which appear to have been solely writen by DeSouza & the auditors.

Water Intelligence (LON:WATR) may prove to be a great growth company, but given the above governance issues it is not without risks.

$910k is the net profit (as per the stock report) for 2017.
His remuneration that same year was $450k

2014: $380k / $325k
2015: $580k / $404k
2016: $480k / $447k
2017: $910k / $450k

Doh! Sorry.

wildshot

Executive Chairs is certainly the norm in the US and accepted without question.

Whenever I'm in the US (a few times a year) I often watch Mad Money on CNBC; this is an investment show for private investors. I even tweeted a question on the acceptability of Executive Chairs to the show presenter, former hedge fund manager Jim Cramer. Unsurprising to say I received no reply. I think the US adopt the entrepreneurial spirit to the nth degree hence have little risk limitation barriers like we have as standard practice in our corporate governance.

sharw

I had a look at this and the governance gets even murkier. DeSouza is also Chair and CEO of the PlainSight Group (remuneration unknown). Plain Sight Systems Inc., possibly a subsidiary, gets mentioned 3 times in the last Water Intelligence (LON:WATR) report:

1) it holds 15.95% of WATR
2) Patrick DeSouza and Michael Reisman are directors and shareholders in Plain Sight Systems, Inc.
3) Their holdings in WATR (28.3% and 1.4%) exclude the Plainsight shares.

This page describes the creation of WATR:
http://www.plainsight.com/private-equity.php

At this point I switch off and it goes in my no further action box.

mw8156

mgp is on the main market, not AIM

LeoInvestorUK

Medica (LON:MGP)

Good point. So total listing costs of are 50% higher according to the article I quoted in my earlier comment. Here are the new calculations:

6 months to June 2017 adjusted EBITDA: £4.873m
6 months to June 2017 further adjusted as if quoted for 3 months: £4.686m
6 months to June 2018 adjusted EBITDA: £5.610m

Adjusted EBITDA growth (as stated) = 5610/4873 = 15.1%
Underlying adjusted EBITDA growth = 5610/4686 = 19.7%

As I failed to say earlier, add a some one-off (but not exceptional as not to be reversed) increases in spare staff capacity for growth, and >20% is comfortably achieved. To me that looks a lot better than 15%.

(I know full well because they are on AIM because I deliberately hold them in my SIPP rather than ISA because of the lack of IHT exemption. I even meant to point this out as it is unexpected for a company of that size - I think the reason is to help with credibility amongst customers)

Thanks again Mr (or is it Mrs or Miss or Ms) Cool. I am busy packing for our flight back from Corsica with a couple of days in Paris on the way. Water Intelligence (including your article) will be waiting for me when I get home. Looking forward to reading it.
Julian

Weasel

14th Sep '18

Great thread guys, I was planning to give Water Intelligence (LON:WATR) a closer look, but after reading this, I'll leave it alone. Good luck to all holders though, it does appear to be a company in promising area.

Graham Neary

I'd like to second Weasel's comment. I was incredibly busy on Wed and couldn't participate in the comment thread but there were some great contributions. Thank you.

Small Cap Value Report (Wed 12 September 2018) - WATR, FA., TEG, TPFG, OPM, GOAL

Water Intelligence (LON:WATR)

Unlock the rest of this Article in 15 seconds

About the Author

Graham Neary

40 comments

Unlock this StockReport™ in 15 seconds

Unlock this StockReport™ in 15 seconds